No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Daleville Health and Rehabilitation

290 Commons Parkway, Daleville, VA 24083 · For profit - Corporation · 90 certified beds · (540) 966-0056 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (540) 966-0056 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 32 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
46 Wesley Rd · (540) 591-9440 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
48 Marketplace Dr · (540) 992-5757 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger0.2 mi
72 Kingston Dr · (540) 254-6010 · Call to confirm hours
Park
9644 Reservoir Rd · (540) 362-1757 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
180 Commons Pkwy · (540) 992-4417

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased19.4%14.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight11.4%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.2%1.6%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.3%18.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%3.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened23.4%15.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.0%20.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.9%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.3%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.8%14.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.9%73.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.9%22.3%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.6%11.5%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.511.521.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.051.481.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 108 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
48.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 48.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 54 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 50% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.8%CMS range 44.8–64.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.6–12.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge48.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge55.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge42.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 3.9–12.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.891.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.42
RN hours/ resident / day
1.03
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.79
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.24
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.30
RN hoursweekends
69.8%
Total nursing turnover
62.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 84.3 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.42 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.47 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-04-10)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2023-02-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility kitchen and 2 of 2 nourishment rooms. The findings included: 1. In the facility kitchen, staff failed to maintain the correct concentration of sanitizing solution in the low temperature sanitizing dish machine and stacked (nested) wet pans together. On 4/08/24 at 12:40 PM, during the initial kitchen tour, surveyor observed dietary staff washing pans in the dish machine. The Dietary Manager (DM) stated the dish machine was a low temperature machine using a chemical sanitizer. The DM tested the dish machine final rinse chemical sanitizer concentration using a chlorine test strip; however, the test strip did not change color to indicate the presence of sanitizing solution. The DM retested the solution with another dish machine cycle, however, the test strip failed to change color. The DM stated they would contact the dish machine service provider and staff would use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure the correct code status was in place for 1 of 19 residents in the survey sample, Resident #46. The findings included: For Resident #46, the current code status order was full code, however the comprehensive person-centered care plan and the clinical record Advanced Directive information tab documented the resident as having a DNR (do not resuscitate) decision in place. The resident's clinical record also included a completed Durable Do Not Resuscitate [DDNR] Order. Resident #46's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Acute Follicular Conjunctivitis, Chronic Pain Syndrome, Open-Angle Glaucoma, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Schizophrenia, and Congestive Heart Failure. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/12/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #46's current provider orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, Resident interview and staff interview the facility staff failed to provide a clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 19 residents, Resident #63. The findings included: For Resident #63 the facility staff failed to ensure the resident's room was free from odors. Resident #63's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to Parkinsonism, hypertension, and encounter for palliative care. Resident #63's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 03/11/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 14 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that that the resident is cognitively intact. On 04/08/24 at 1:30 pm, while speaking with Resident #63, surveyor observed a strong odor of urine in the resident's room. Surveyor spoke with Resident #63 again on 04/09/24 at 11am. There was again a strong odor of urine in the resident's room. Surveyor spoke with certified nurse's aide (CNA) #2 outside of resident's room at this time. Surveyor asked CNA #2 if they could identify the odor in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet the needs of the resident for 1 of 19 residents in the survey sample, Resident #2. The findings included: For Resident #2, the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive person-centered care plan (CPCCP) intervention and registered dietitian's (RD) recommendation to weigh the resident weekly. Resident #2's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Multiple Sclerosis, Vascular Dementia, Epilepsy, Hemiplegia Affecting Right Dominant Side, Dysphagia Following Cerebral Infarction, and Atrial Fibrillation. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/23/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 5 out of 15 indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The resident was coded for the presence of a feeding tube in which they received 51% or more of total calories during the previous seven (7)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) care for 2 of 19 residents, Resident #31 and #63. The findings included: 1. For Resident #31, the facility staff failed to provide ADL care. Resident #31's fingernails were observed to be long with debris present. Resident #31's diagnoses included, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage affecting left dominant side. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #31's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/08/24 included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of a possible 15 points. Section GG (functional abilities and goals) was coded to indicate Resident #31 was dependent (1) in the area of personal hygiene. On 04/08/24, during initial tour of the facility Resident #31's fingernails on both hands were observed to be long with debris present. On 04/09/24 at 8:58 a.m., during an observation of Resident #31 with the Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow the medical provider orders for 1 of 19 residents in the survey sample, Resident #62. The findings included: For Resident #62, the facility staff failed to administer the medication, Questran on two separate occasions. Resident #62's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Adult Failure to Thrive, Fecal Abnormalities, Dementia, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation, and Chronic Pain. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/31/24 assigned the resident brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 13 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #62's clinical records included a 3/26/24 hospice nurse progress note which read in part Upon entering patient's room I noted that patient, clothing and bed linens were covered in a brown substance. The patient stated it was a mixture of Boost and diarrhea .Staff report that patient has multiple episodes of diarrhea each day and that Imodium was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, facility staff failed to provide treatment as ordered for pressure ulcers for 2 of 19 residents in the survey sample (Residents #68 and #35). Resident #68 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including, but not limited to, hypertension, seizures, pressure ulcers, pain, anxiety, and depression. On the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment, the resident scored 15/15 on the brief interview for for mental status and was assessed as without signs of delirium, psychosis, or behaviors affecting care. The electronic clinical record contained orders for daily dressing changes to a sacral wound. The Treatment Administration Record was blank for 4/4/2024. The nursing progress note dated 4/4/2024 at 2:10 AM documented the resident refused a shower at that time but agreed to a bed bath. There were no wound care notes on that date. The surveyor asked to speak with the wound care nurse about missed treatments on 4/8/2024, but was not able to speak with the nurse. The administrator and director of nursing were made aware of the concern…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to complete a safe smoking assessment for 1 of 19 residents, Resident #20. The findings included: For Resident #20, the facility staff failed to complete a safe smoking assessment when resident was admitted to the facility. Resident #20's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, dementia, Alzheimer's disease, and nicotine dependence. Resident #20's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 02/09/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 5 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that that the resident is severely cognitively impaired. Resident #20's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a care plan for Resident will smoke safely at designated areas at scheduled times through next review. Interventions for this care plan include Safe smoking screen completed on admission and as needed. During entrance conference, survey…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide the health care provider ordered therapeutic diet for 2 of 19 residents, Resident #54 and #25. The findings included: 1. For Resident #54, the facility staff failed to provide the health care provider ordered Magic Cup. Resident #54's diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease and dysphagia. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #54's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/07/24 included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 14 out of a possible 15 points. Resident #54's comprehensive care plan included the area of nutrition. Goals included diet as ordered. Resident #54's clinical record included a provider order for a Magic Cup three times a day with trays. Order date 03/11/24. On 04/09/24 at 8:30 a.m., the surveyor observed Resident #54's breakfast meal. Resident #54 was observed with chocolate ice cream on their meal tray. The surveyor did not observe a Magic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to obtain a provider ordered medication for 1 of 19 residents in the survey sample, Resident #46. The findings included: For Resident #46, the facility staff failed to obtain Alaway eye drops (antihistamine eye drops used to provide temporary relief for itchy eyes due to ragweed, pollen, grass, animal hair and dander) as ordered by the provider. Resident #46's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Acute Follicular Conjunctivitis, Chronic Pain Syndrome, Open-Angle Glaucoma, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Schizophrenia, and Congestive Heart Failure. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/12/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. On 4/08/24 at 1:11 PM, while speaking with Resident #46, surveyor noted redness of the right eye and underneath the eye. When asked the cause of the redness, Resident #46 stated their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to review and act upon a monthly medication regimen review for 1 of 19 residents, Resident #234. The findings included: For Resident #234 the facility staff failed to follow-up on pharmacy recommendation from the monthly medication regimen review. Resident #234's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus. Resident #234's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 02/17/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 14 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Resident #234's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a care plan for Resident is as risk for complications associated with hyper or hypoglycemia related to: diabetes on insulin therapy. The director of nursing (DON) provided the survey team with a list of residents who had a medication regimen review with recommendations for the month of February 2024. Resident #234…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a complete and accurate clinical record for 2 of 19 residents in the survey sample, Resident #46 and #21. The findings included: For Resident #46, the facility staff failed to document a change in the resident's condition resulting in an acute care hospital admission. Resident #46's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Acute Follicular Conjunctivitis, Chronic Pain Syndrome, Open-Angle Glaucoma, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Schizophrenia, and Congestive Heart Failure. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/12/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. On 4/08/24 at 1:11 PM, surveyor spoke with Resident #46 who stated they were sent to the hospital in December after being sick for three to four days. The resident stated upon arrival at the hospital their temperature was 104.5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-10 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program to meet the needs of the facility and failed to monitor and revise as needed the plan of correction for the standard recertification surveys dated 4/11/19, 5/27/21, and 2/16/23 in order to maintain compliance as evidenced by repeated deficiencies in the area of Pharmacy Services. The findings included: The area of Pharmacy Services was previously cited with the 4/11/19, 5/27/21, and 2/16/23 standard surveys due to failure to provide evidence of the attending medical provider reviewing and acting upon monthly drug regimen reviews completed by the pharmacist. This deficiency was cited again on the current standard survey dated 4/10/24 due to failure to provide evidence of the attending medical provider review and action taken upon monthly drug regimen reviews completed by the pharmacist for 1 of 5 residents reviewed. On 4/10/24 at 2:45 PM, surveyor met with the Administrator to review the facility QAPI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety as evidenced by a final rinse temperature below 180 degrees Fahrenheit (F) for a high temperature (heat sanitization) dishwasher in the facility kitchen. The findings included: The facility staff failed to consistently maintain a final rinse temperature at the manufacturer recommended minimum temperature of 180 degrees F for the facility high temperature dishwasher. On 2/13/23 at 2:10 pm, the surveyor observed the facility dishwasher in use. The dietary manager (DM) stated the machine was a high temperature dishwasher. Dishwasher wash and rinse temperature gauges were located on the front of the machine. The wash temperature reached a maximum of 150 degrees F, and the rinse temperature reached a maximum temperature of 170 degrees F. The DM stated the rinse temperature should be 180 degrees F and proceeded to empty and drain the machine and ran another cycle. At that time the wash temperature…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and document reviews, the facility staff failed to maintain complete and accurate clinical records for five (5) of 24 residents, Resident #50, Resident #68, Resident #70, Resident #125, and Resident #176. The findings include: 1. Resident #50's Medication Regimen Review (MRR) dated 12/30/22 failed to include documentation of the medical provider's reason for not attempting a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR). Resident #50's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/9/23, was signed as completed on 2/3/23. Resident #50 was assessed as able to make self understood and able to understand others. Resident #50's Brief Interview for Mental Status summary score was documented as an 8 out of 15; this indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #50 was assessed as being independent with bed mobility and eating. Resident #50 was assessed as requiring assistance with personal hygiene and bathing. The following information was found in a facility document titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident representative interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to notify the resident representative of significant changes in the resident's physical condition for 1 of 24 residents in the survey sample, Resident #61. The findings included: For Resident #61, the facility staff failed to notify the resident representative of significant weight loss in a timely manner and failed to notify of an episode of rectal bleeding. Resident #61's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Chronic Conjunctivitis, Unspecified Blepharitis, and Repeated Falls. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/19/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 3 out of 15 indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #61 was coded as requiring limited assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and document review, the facility staff failed to complete a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one (1) of 24 residents, Resident #68. The findings include: The facility staff failed to complete a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment when Resident #68 started receiving hospice care. Resident #68's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/11/23, was signed as completed on 1/11/23. Modifications to this MDS assessment were documented on 2/14/23 and 2/16/23. Resident #68 was assessed as rarely or never able to make self understood and as rarely or never able to understand others. Resident #68 was assessed as the Brief Interview for Mental Status should not be completed due to the resident being rarely/never understood. Resident #68 was documented a being dependent on others for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #68 had an order for consult for hospice care and to treat if approved dated 11/29/22. Documentation indicated the hospice admission was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and document reviews, the facility staff failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected residents' conditions for two (2) of 24 residents, Resident #68 and Resident #70. The findings include: 1. Resident #68's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment (with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/11/23) had the resident assessed as both able to make self understood and as being rarely/never understood. Resident #68's MDS assessment, with an ARD of 1/11/23, was signed as completed on 1/11/23. Resident #68 was assessed as able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #68 was also assessed not to have the Brief Interview for Mental Status completed due to the resident being rarely/never understood. Resident #68 was documented a being dependent on others for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. On 2/14/23 at 4:04 p.m., the surveyor discussed Resident #68's conflicting MDS data with the facility's Administer. On 2/16/23, the survey team was provided with a modified MDS assessment that had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. The facility staff failed to develop a care plan to address Resident #68's hospice needs. Resident #68's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/11/23, was signed as completed on 1/11/23. Modification to this MDS assessment were documented on 2/14/23 and 2/16/23. Resident #68 was assessed as rarely or never able to make self understood and as rarely or never able to understand others. Resident #68 was assessed as the Brief Interview for Mental Status should not be completed due to the resident being rarely/never understood. Resident #68 was documented a being dependent on others for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #68 had an order for consult for hospice care and to treat if approved dated 11/29/22. Documentation indicated the hospice admission was delayed until 12/7/22 at the request of one of the resident's family members. On 2/15/23 at 2:10 p.m., Registered Nurse (RN) #1 was interviewed about Resident #68's care plan. RN…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and document review, the facility staff failed to ensure clinical documentation supported new diagnoses for two (2) of 24 residents, Resident #68 and Resident #50. The findings include: 1. Resident #68's clinical documentation included the diagnosis of Schizoaffective disorder, unspecified dated 12/21/22. Resident #68's clinical documentation failed to include assessment information to support the addition if this diagnosis. Resident #68's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/11/23, was signed as completed on 1/11/23. Modification to this MDS assessment were documented on 2/14/23 and 2/16/23. Resident #68 was assessed as rarely or never able to make self understood and as rarely or never able to understand others. Resident #68 was assessed as the Brief Interview for Mental Status should not be completed due to the resident being rarely/never understood. Resident #68 was documented a being dependent on others for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. The following information was found in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility document review and clinical record review, and staff interview facility staff failed to provide treatment as ordered for one of 24 current residents in the survey sample (Resident # 176). Resident #176 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included primary adrenocortical insufficiency, ployneuropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, polymyalgia rheumatica, common variable immunodeficiency, morbid obesity type 2 diabetes mellitus, chronic pancreatitis, depression, anxiety, muscle spasms, nausea, allergies, edema, primary adrenocortical insufficiency, hypertension, and insomnia. At the time of the survey, the resident did not yet have a minimum data set assessment. The surveyor interviewed the resident on 2/13/2023 and found the resident knowledgeable about diagnoses and treatment and able to answer questions about the time in the facility. The resident expressed no concerns other than lack of medication availability and not having received a fentanyl patch (due…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, facility staff failed to provide pressure ulcer treatment as ordered for one of 24 current residents in the survey sample (Resident #5). Resident #5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, gastroesophageal reflux, muscle weakness, major depression, osteoarthritis, cognitive communication deficit and polyneuropathy. On the minimum data set assessment with assessment reference date 12/8/2022, the resident scored 15/15 on the brief interview for mental status and was assessed as without signs of delirium, psychosis, or behaviors affecting treatment. The resident was assessed as having one unhealed stage two pressure ulcer and application of non-surgical dressing. During clinical record review, the surveyor noted an order to Cover pressure area to buttock with Mepilex change daily until healed dated 11/25 and discontinued on 12/03/2022. The Treatment Administration Record indicated the treatment N=not administered, other, see note on 11/27-11/29/2022. The nurse's notes did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for 1 of 24 residents in the survey sample, Resident #61. The findings included: For Resident #61, the facility staff failed to administer the nutritional supplement Ensure as ordered by the physician and failed to follow the registered dietician's (RD) recommendations to increase the amount of Ensure or add the nutritional supplement Magic Cup. The facility staff also failed to ensure the resident's weight loss was addressed by the provider in a timely manner. Resident #61's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Chronic Conjunctivitis, Unspecified Blepharitis, and Repeated Falls. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/19/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 3 out of 15 indicating the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. The facility staff failed to assess respiratory status for Resident #125. Resident #125 was COVID-19 positive at the time of admission. On the afternoon of 2/13/23, Resident #125 was observed to be resting in bed, coughing. Resident #125's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment had yet to be completed at the time of the survey. Review of Resident #125's clinical documentation failed to reveal evidence of a respiratory exam until approximately 38 hours after the resident's arrival to the facility. The following information was found in a facility policy titled Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) - Identification and Management of Ill Residents (with a revised date of September 20212): - Residents are monitored daily for signs of respiratory infection and/or symptoms of COVID-19, including: a. fever (temperature (greater than or equal to) 100.0 (degrees Fahrenheit) and/or chills; b. cough; c. shortness of breath or difficulty breathing; d.fatigue; e. muscle or body aches; f. headache; g. new loss of taste or smell; h. sore throat; i. congestion or runny nose; j. nausea or vomiting; and/or k.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive services consistent with the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 24 residents in the survey sample, Resident #42. The findings included: For Resident #42, the facility staff failed to monitor the resident's hemodialysis access site for adequate blood flow and complications. Resident #42's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Hypertensive Heart Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease, End Stage Renal Disease, Dependence on Renal Dialysis, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Schizoaffective Disorder. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/21/22 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #42 was coded as receiving dialysis within the past 14 days. Resident #42's comprehensive person-centered care plan included a care plan description…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-16 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and document review, the facility staff failed to ensure Medication Regimen Reviews (MRRs) were addressed by a medical provider for two (2) of 24 residents, Resident #68 and Resident #61. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure two (2) of Resident #68's Medication Regimen Reviews (MRRs) were documented and addressed by a medical provider. Resident #68's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/11/23, was signed as completed on 1/11/23. Modification to this MDS assessment were documented on 2/14/23 and 2/16/23. Resident #68 was assessed as rarely or never able to make self understood and as rarely or never able to understand others. Resident #68 was assessed as the Brief Interview for Mental Status should not be completed due to the resident being rarely/never understood. Resident #68 was documented a being dependent on others for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene. Resident #68's clinical documentation included the following notes: - On 8/29/22 at 1:40 p.m., Medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident representative interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents are free of any significant medication errors for 1 of 24 residents in the survey sample, Resident #61. The findings included: For Resident #61, the facility staff failed to provide three antibiotics as ordered for severe bilateral conjunctivitis and failed to hold the anticoagulant, Eliquis, as ordered by the provider following an episode of rectal bleeding. Resident #61's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Chronic Conjunctivitis, Unspecified Blepharitis, and Repeated Falls. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/19/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 3 out of 15 indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #61 was coded as requiring limited assistance with bed mobility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-02-16 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide laboratory services to meet the needs of the resident for 1 of 24 residents in the survey sample, Resident #61. The findings included: For Resident #61, the facility staff failed to obtain a complete blood count (CBC), iron saturation level, ferritin level, total iron binding capacity level, and failed to check stool for occult blood as order by the medical provider on 12/22/22 due to rectal bleeding. Resident #61's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, Chronic Atrial Fibrillation, Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Chronic Conjunctivitis, Unspecified Blepharitis, and Repeated Falls. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/19/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 3 out of 15 indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #61 was coded as requiring limited assistance with bed mobility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-05-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    7. For Resident #11, the facility staff failed to provide assistance with showers per the resident's preference of twice weekly. Resident #11's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Spondylolisthesis Lumbar Region, Bipolar II Disorder, Hereditary Motor and Sensory Neuropathy, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, and Epilepsy Unspecified not Intractable without Status Epilepticus. The most recent quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/22/21 assigned the resident a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 14 out of 15 in section C, Cognitive Patterns. Resident #11 was coded as being totally dependent in bathing. On 5/26/21 at 9:19 am, surveyor spoke with Resident #11 who stated that they did not get their shower on Monday because there was not enough staff. Resident further stated that this happens often on Mondays. The next morning at 8:58 am, surveyor again spoke with Resident #11 concerning their showers and asked if they receive showers two times per week and the resident stated it depends if there's enough…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-27 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to accurately code a MDS (minimum data set) assessment to reflect the resident's status for 1 of 22 residents, Resident #61. The findings include: For Resident #61, facility staff failed to code the resident's most recent weight on the 4/23/21 quarterly MDS assessment. Resident #61's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, not limited to Parkinson's Disease, Unspecified Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Schizoaffective Disorder Bipolar Type, Major Depressive Disorder Recurrent Moderate, Agoraphobia with Panic Disorder, and Chronic Pain Syndrome. The most recent quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/23/21 assigned the resident a BIMS (brief interview of mental status) score of 14 out of 15 in section C, Cognitive Patterns. In section K, Swallowing/Nutritional Status, Resident #61's most recent weight in the last 30 days was coded with a -. Resident #61 was also coded as no or unknown for a weight loss 5% or more in the last month or loss of 10% or more in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the residents receive treatment and care in accordance with the comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 22 residents, Residents #31 and #19. The findings included: 1. For Resident #31, facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for the administration of Acidophilus (a probiotic supplement), Baclofen (a skeletal muscle relaxant used to treat pain and certain types of spasticity), Diazepam (a benzodiazepine used to relieve anxiety and control muscle spasms and spasticity), Gabapentin (an anticonvulsant used to control seizures, restless leg syndrome, and relieve nerve pain), and Simethicone (an anti-gas medication). Resident #31's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but limited to Muscle Wasting and Atrophy not Elsewhere Classified Other Site, Unspecified Injury at Unspecified Level of Cervical Spinal Cord, Functional Quadriplegia, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder Recurrent Mild. The most recent quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-05-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    2. For Resident #31, the facility staff failed to report the February 2021 drug regimen review to the attending physician, the facility medical director, and the DON (director of nursing). Resident #31's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but limited to Muscle Wasting and Atrophy not Elsewhere Classified Other Site, Unspecified Injury at Unspecified Level of Cervical Spinal Cord, Functional Quadriplegia, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, and Major Depressive Disorder Recurrent Mild. The most recent quarterly MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/27/21 assigned the resident a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15 out of 15 in section C, Cognitive patterns. Upon review of Resident #31's clinical record on 5/26/21, surveyor was unable to locate the February 2021 drug regimen review completed by the pharmacist. On 5/27/21 at 10:54 am, surveyor spoke with the DON who stated they have just spoken with the pharmacist and they did not send the February drug regimen review recommendations to the facility. DON stated the pharmacist is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$530K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 56%Medicare 8%Other / private 36%

This home reported $530K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$331per resident / day
operating cost
$10,048per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$320per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495386. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-04-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next