No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Greensville Health And Rehabilitation Center

214 Weaver Ave, Emporia, VA 23847 · For profit - Corporation · 65 certified beds · (434) 348-2150 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (434) 348-2150 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)2 actual-harm citations
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 20% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
511 Belfield Dr · (434) 348-4680 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
306 Weaver Ave · (434) 348-4987 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Food Lion0.4 mi
216 Market Dr · (434) 348-0925 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
1155 Sussex Dr · (434) 336-7050

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.2%14.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.2%5.4%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.4%0.9%typical
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.5%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.4%18.7%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.0%3.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened30.9%15.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication9.6%20.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.4%4.7%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.2%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.3%14.2%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.1%73.6%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.7%22.3%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit17.5%11.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.261.521.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.391.481.80worse

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 130 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
46.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.46U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.19hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.19hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 46.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 76 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.46 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 77% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 11% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.7%CMS range 47.3–63.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.1%CMS range 7.5–14.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge46.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge43.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge30.3%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization9.1%CMS range 5.8–13.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.181.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.62
RN hours/ resident / day
0.72
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.73
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.07
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.38
RN hoursweekends
45.7%
Total nursing turnover
50.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 61.8 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.07 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.62 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.75 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.20 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2023-07-28)
3
at the previous standard inspection (2021-04-23)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2018-10-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to prevent and treat pressure wounds for 2 residents (Resident #1 and #35) of 26 residents in the survey sample resulting in harm for Resident #1. 1. For Resident #1, the facility did not provide an air mattress for four months, did not administer a physician order for Flagyl (antibiotic) for nine days and did not obtain a wound consult until ten days after it was ordered by the physician. This resulted in harm. 2. For Resident #35, the facility failed to provide interventions to prevent pressure injuries. Resident #35 had three deep fingernail indentations in the right palm of the Resident's hand that had contractures. The findings included: 1. For Resident #1, the facility did not provide an air mattress for four months, did not administer a physician order for Flagyl (antibiotic) for nine days and did not obtain a wound consult until ten days after it was ordered by the physician. This resulted in harm. Resident #1 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2018-10-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation and clinical record review, the facility failed to, for one resident, Resident #43, in a survey sample of 26 residents, to ensure the resident's mechanical soft diet was followed, resulting in harm. Resident #43 was served cantaloupe chunks instead of a fruit crisp that was on the Registered Dietician's approved menu. As a result of eating a cantaloupe chunk, the resident choked and required the Heimlich maneuver and suctioning. The findings included: Resident # 43 was admitted to the facility 3-4-17. Her diagnoses included but were not limited to: Stroke, dementia and hemiplegia. Resident #43's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9-24-18 was coded as a quarterly assessment. Resident #43 was coded as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Memory Status) Score of 9 out of 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. She was coded as needing extensive to total assistance of one staff member to perform her activities of daily living. Resident #43 was coded as requiring extensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-28 · tag F0571 — pattern
    Limit the charges against residents' personal funds for items or services for which payment is made under Medicare or Medicaid.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff charged the Resident and deducted from their patient trust account, funds in excess what was due to the facility for three Residents (Resident #17, #37 and #23), in a survey sample of 6 Residents reviewed with trust accounts. This happened on five occasions. The findings included: 1. For Resident #17, the facility staff withdrew $153 in excess of what was due towards the cost of care on two occasions, March 2023, and May 2023. On 7/27/23, Surveyor C received and reviewed the Resident trust account statement for Resident #17 for the year of 2023. During this review it was noted that on March 3, 2023, $1,129 was deducted/withdrawn from the Resident's trust account for Care Cost Auto WDL [automatic withdrawal]. Review of the patient pay information from the Virginia Medicaid Web portal indicated Resident #17 owed the facility $976 each month. Then on 4/7/23, instead of withdrawing the $976 due for the cost of care, the facility withdrew $823, to offset the overpayment in March. On 5/3/23, another withdrawal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-28 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to serve the planned menu as approved by the facility's Registered Dietitian (RD) to residents with physician's orders for regular, mechanical soft, or pureed diets. This failure had the potential to affect 61 residents who were served meals from the facility's kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Menus, revised on 10/17, revealed, Menus are developed and prepared to meet resident choices including religious, cultural and ethnic needs while following established national guidelines for nutritional adequacy. Menus for regular and therapeutic diets are written at least two (2) weeks in advance, and are dated and posted in the kitchen at least one (1) week in advance. A group interview meeting was conducted on 07/26/23 at 1:00 PM with five residents whom the facility identified as reliable historians. During the meeting, two of the five residents (R53, and R56), voiced concerns about the kitchen not always serving the facility's planned menu. Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to serve milk from the kitchen's tray line at an internal temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F.) or below and staff failed to wear hair restraints when they served soup to residents from two crock pots in the facility's main dining room for 25 out of 61 residents who consumed meals prepared at the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Safety, with a revised date of 12/13, revealed, . All cold items need to be held at 40 [degrees] F. or lower. To keep food cold during service surround product with draining ice or keep refrigerated and only pull a few out as needed during service. Review of the facility's policy titled, Preventing Foodborne Illness- Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices, with a revised date of 11/22, revealed, All employees who handle food, prepare or serve food are trained in the practices of safe food handling and preventing foodborne illness. Employees will demonstrate knowledge and competency in these practices prior to working with food or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement infection control practices to prevent the spread of infection on 2 of 2 nursing units, which had the potential to affect multiple Residents. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to adhere to standard precautions and perform hand hygiene/cleanse hands between Residents during medication administration. On 7/26/23 at 8:58 AM until 10:05 AM, continuous observations of medication administration were conducted with LPN E. The following was observed: LPN E retrieved from the medication cart, the medications for Resident #33. LPN E then approached Resident #33, who was sitting in the hallway across from the nursing station, administered the medications, then returned to the medication cart to dispose of the medication cup and water cup. LPN E then proceeded to retrieve the medications from the cart for Resident #40. LPN E prepared the medications at the medication cart, then went to the nourishment room on the other nursing unit to retrieve a liquid medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to assess for appropriateness of self-administration of medications for 1 Resident (Resident #23) in a survey sample of 44 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #23, the facility allowed the Resident to have physician ordered ointment, at the bedside, without first assessing the Resident's ability to self-medicate. On 7/25/23 at 3:31 PM, Resident #23 was noted to have a medication cup of a clear ointment at the bedside, unsecured. On 7/25/23 at approximately 3:35 PM, Surveyor C had LPN B accompany her to the room of Resident #23. When asked what the cup of ointment was, LPN B said, she didn't know. When asked if it should be at the bedside, LPN B said, No and discarded it in the trash. LPN B then went to the nursing station and looked at Resident #23's physician orders and noted an order for Neosporin ointment that is to be applied twice daily. LPN B said, it must have been left there from the night shift. On 7/25/23, a clinical record review was conducted of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to have call bells accessible for two of two residents (Resident (R)5, and R19) reviewed for accommodation of needs out of 44 sampled residents. These failures had the potential to cause a delay in the provision of care for these two residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled, Answering the Call light, revised on 11/22, revealed, Ensure that the call light is accessible to the resident when in bed, from the toilet, from the shower or bathing facility and from the floor. 1. Review of R5's Medical Diagnosis, sheet located in the Med Diag [diagnosis] tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R5 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting the left non-dominant side, and lack of coordination. Review of R5's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/09/23, located in the MDS tab of the EMR, revealed R5 required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to offer and/or provide Advance Directive planning for 2 residents, Resident #15 and Resident #44, in a survey sample of 44 residents. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to offer and/or provide Resident #15 or their Responsible Party (RP) with Advance Directive planning. On [DATE] at approximately 11:30 AM, an attempt to interview Resident #15 was made, however she declined. An interview was conducted with her Responsible Party (RP). The RP stated, I take an active part in planning my mother's care here at the facility, I do not recall anyone ever asking her whether or not she would want CPR [cardiopulmonary resuscitation], but I can tell you that she does not, she has wanted DNR [do not resuscitate] for many years now. On [DATE] at approximately 12:15 PM, a clinical record review for Resident #15 was performed and revealed active physician's orders dated [DATE] that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to continue skilled services and bill the Resident as requested on the SNF ABN notice (Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice) issued to 2 Residents (Resident #14 and #44) in a survey sample of 3 Residents, reviewed for such notices. The findings included: 1. For Resident #14, the Resident selected on a SNF ABN form that she wanted to continue to receive the services, and the facility staff ended the services, despite the Resident's request. On 7/26/23, during a review of Resident #14's SNF ABN notice, it was noted that the Resident #14's skilled care services were ending on 4/7/23. The facility staff presented the Resident with a SNF ABN notice on 4/4/23, which Resident #14 selected option 2, which read, I want the care listed above, but don't bill Medicare. I understand that I may be billed now because I am responsible for payment of the care. I cannot appeal because Medicare won't be billed. Review of the therapy notes revealed that Resident #14's last day of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan following a significant weight loss affecting one Resident (Resident #4) in a survey sample of 44 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #4, who had a significant weight loss while at the facility, the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan with interventions to address the weight loss and interventions implemented by the facility. From 7/25/23-7/28/23, various observations were made of Resident #4 during the lunch and supper meals. Resident #4 was interviewed and said she had no appetite. Resident #4 was observed to be unable to feed herself and was totally dependent upon facility staff for assistance. A clinical record review was conducted and revealed that Resident #4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and was noted to weigh 108 lbs. Resident #4's weight was taken almost weekly and noted a continuous decline. On 6/19/23, Resident #4 weighed 97.7 lbs.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services in accordance with professional standards for 3 residents, Resident #55, Resident #34, and Resident #52, in a sample size of 44 residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #55, facility staff failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician. On 7/25/23 at approximately 11:30 AM, an interview was conducted with Resident #55. Resident #55 stated, The doctor prescribed my some cream the other day for a rash on my left thigh and I still haven't received it, the rash is still there. On 7/25/23 at approximately 12:15 PM, a clinical record review was performed and revealed a nursing note dated 7/23/23 at 18:54 which documented a telephone order received from the physician for Diprolene .5% cream, apply to rash once daily . and an orders administration note dated 7/24/23 at 08:37 which documented Diprolene External Ointment 0.05%…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interviews and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure quality of care based on professional standards and the person-centered care plan was provided for one Resident (Resident #38) in a survey sample of 44 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #38 the facility staff failed to ensure that the Resident had appropriate seating to maintain her comfort, relieve pressure, prevent her legs from dangling, which would promote swelling/edema in her legs and feet; and be safe in the facility provided wheelchair. On 7/25/23, Resident #38 was observed sitting in a wheelchair at the nursing station. Resident #38 was observed to be sitting on two cushions, which elevated her to the point that her legs were dangling and not touching the floor. Footrests were not on the chair. Observations of Resident #38's room revealed leg rests and foot pedals for the wheelchair in the floor next to the bed. Also noted was a 1/2 tray that would go on the wheelchair but was not in use. On 7/26/23, a clinical record review was conducted. This review revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide/arrange for one Resident (Resident #13) in a survey sample of 44 Residents to obtain new prescription lenses in her glasses, as ordered. The findings included: On 7/25/23 at 2:40 PM, during initial tour, Resident #13 was visited in her room. Resident #13 was asked about her vision and the Resident said, I need to get my vision checked and reported she is having difficulty seeing. The Resident did not recall last time she saw eye doctor. On 7/26/23, a clinical record review was conducted of Resident #13's chart. This review revealed the following: Resident #13 had a physician order dated 9/15/22, that read, May have consultation for ophthalmology, podiatry, dental and optometry as needed. Resident #13's care plan was reviewed, and her vision or use of glasses was not identified on the care plan. Documentation regarding the offering of an eye exam with regards to the Resident's report of difficulty seeing was not found in the clinical chart. On 7/26/23, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement interventions to prevent the development of pressure ulcers for one Resident (Resident #35) in a survey sample of 44 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #35, who was at risk for the development of a pressure ulcer, the facility staff failed to apply heel protective boots as ordered by the physician. A clinical record review was conducted and revealed that Resident #35 had a physician order dated 5/23/23, that read, place heel protector on right heel every shift for wound. An excerpt from Resident #35's care plan read, The resident has potential for pressure ulcer development r/t [related to] immobility, incontinent of B&B [bowel and bladder]. Interventions for this care plan focus area was, Administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness, follow facility policies/protocols for the prevention/treatment of skin breakdown . Resident #35's most recent Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk was conducted 5/23/23, and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide splints to address range of motion loss and/or contractures for two of five residents (Resident (R)19, and R5) reviewed for limited range of motion. These failures had the potential to cause worsening contractures for these two residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Braces, Splints, and Prostheses, dated 04/20/11 revealed, Braces, splints, and prostheses assist a resident with support normal joint alignment and positioning. These devices also prevent or minimize deformities such as contractures. As a result, these devices facilitate mobility and activity of daily living skills. Braces, splints and prostheses may only be removed with orders of M.D. [medical doctor] 1. Review of R19's Medical Diagnosis, sheet located in the Med Diag [diagnosis] tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R19 had diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following other nontraumatic intracranial hemorrhage affecting right dominant side, and lack of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review the facility failed to administer enteral feedings as ordered for one of one sampled Resident (R)213 reviewed for enteral feedings. This failure had the potential to cause weight loss and/or other nutritional complications for this resident. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Enteral Nutrition, revised on 11/18, revealed, Adequate nutritional support through enteral nutrition is provided to residents as ordered. Review of R213's Medical Diagnosis, sheet located in the Med Diag [diagnosis] tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R213 had diagnoses which included dysphagia and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of R213's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 07/10/23, located in MDS tab of the EMR, specified the resident had a feeding tube and received 51 percent or more of her total calories through the feeding tube. The resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0/15, which indicated severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-28 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement a system to assure the accurate accounting of controlled medications on 2 of 3 medication carts inspected and failed to ensure medications were available for use for 1 (Resident #55) of 44 sampled residents. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure the correct quantity of controlled medications was accurate on 2 medication carts. On 07/26/23 at 09:11 AM, a medication cart on the East wing nursing station. The observation/inspection was conducted in the presence of LPN E. During a controlled medication count, it was noted that Resident #164's Clonazepam 1 mg tablet's corresponding controlled drug count sheet indicated 9 tablets should be present. Observation of the card revealed only 8 tablets. LPN E confirmed the findings. Observation of Resident #15's Lorazepam 0.5 mg revealed 3 tablets present and the controlled medication count sheet indicated 4 tablets should have been present. Resident #15's Tramadol HCL 50 mg tablet medication card was noted to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-28 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to offer routine dental care for one Resident (Resident #13) in a survey sample of 44 Residents. The findings included: On 7/25/23, during initial tour, Resident #13 was visited in her room. Resident #13 was observed to have many teeth that were broken at the gum and were discolored, black in color. When asked, Resident #13 denied pain, but also stated she had not seen a dentist. When asked if this was something she would be interested in, Resident #13 indicated yes. On 7/26/23, a clinical record review was conducted of Resident #13's chart. This review revealed the following: Resident #13 had a physician order dated 9/15/22, that read, May have consultation for ophthalmology, podiatry, dental and optometry as needed. Resident #13 had a care plan that read, [Resident #13's name redacted] has oral/dental health problems r/t [related to] Poor oral hygiene. The associated interventions for this care plan read, . Coordinate arrangements for dental care, transportation as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-23 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — pattern
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and electronic medical record (EMR) review, the facility failed to provide dental services for 4 of 8 residents (Resident (R) 6, R19, R29, R48). Findings include: 1. Review of R6's EMR, under the Profile tab showed that R6 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance. Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) 09/11/20 in the EMR under the MDS tab, showed a Brief Interview of Mental Status, (BIM) cognitive status of a score of 3 of 15, evidenced that R6 had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment showed R6 had no broken or missing teeth, no broken dentures, and no mouth pain. Review of a quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 04/12/21 in the EMR under the MDS tab indicated R6 was not assessed for any dental pain or difficulty chewing. Review of Nursing Notes in the EMR under the Progress Notes tab and documentation in the paper medical record under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, staff interview, and observation, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for one of 27 sampled residents (Resident (R) 6) reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to develop a care plan to address R6's dental status/missing teeth. Findings include: Review of R6's electrical medical record (EMR), under the Profile tab indicated that R6 was admitted with the diagnoses which included unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance. Review of an annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 09/11/20 in the EMR under the MDS tab, showed a Brief Mental Status assessment score of 3 of 15 and evidenced severe cognitive impairment. The assessment showed R6 had no broken or missing teeth, no broken dentures, and no mouth pain. Review of a quarterly MDS assessment with an ARD of 04/12/21 in the EMR under the MDS tab indicated R6 was not assessed for any dental pain or difficulty chewing. R6 was observed on 04/21/21 at 9:21 AM, sitting in a wheelchair in her room. Attempts to interview R6 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-04-23 · tag F0700 — isolated
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on review of facility policy, record review, and staff interviews the facility failed to ensure for one of one resident reviewed for the use of side rails in a sample of 20 residents (Resident (R)3, that R3 had been assessed for the use of side rails, a physician's order had been obtained for the use of side rails, and a care plan developed with specific interventions for the use of the side rails. The assessment for the use of side rails indicated not needed, no physicians order was obtained and no care plan developed for R3. Findings include: The facility's Bed Safety Policy, undated, read, Our facility shall strive to provide a safe sleeping environment for the resident; and 1. The resident's sleeping environment shall be assessed by the interdisciplinary team, considering the resident's safety, medical conditions, comfort, and freedom of movement, as well as input from the resident and family's regarding previous sleeping habits and bed environment; and 5. If side rails are used, there shall be an interdisciplinary assessment of the resident, consultation with the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-10-12 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — pattern
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Resident #43 was placed on Seroquel (antipsychotic) 50 mg (milligrams) twice daily for dementia without behavioral disturbance. There is no appropriate diagnosis for use and the medication is associated with increased risk of death in the elderly with dementia. Additionally, there were no care plan interventions to address behaviors or for the continued use of an antipsychotic. Resident # 43 was admitted to the facility 3-4-17. Her diagnoses included but were not limited to: Stroke, dementia and hemiplegia. Resident #43's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 9-24-18 was coded as a quarterly assessment. Resident #43 was coded as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Memory Status) Score of 9 out of 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. She was coded as needing extensive to total assistance of one staff member to perform her activities of daily living. Resident #43 was coded as requiring extensive assistance for eating. There were no behaviors documented for the 7…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-10-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed for 5 Residents (Resident #23, #13, #28, #53, #43) in a sample of 26 residents to ensure they were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications. 1. For Resident #23, the facility staff failed to ensure he was free from the psychotropic medication Seroquel which is not indicated for residents with the diagnosis of dementia with or without behavioral disturbances. 2. For Resident #13, the facility staff failed to ensure she was free from the psychotropic medication Risperdal which is not indicated for residents with a diagnosis of dementia with behavioral disturbance. 3. For Resident #28, the facility staff failed to ensure that he was free of Seroquel, which according to the Black Box Warning, is not indicated for use in residents with Dementia-related psychosis. 4. Resident #53 was administered Seroquel (antipsychotic medication) without an appropriate supporting diagnosis. 5.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2018-10-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement an antibiotic stewardship program. The facility staff failed to monitor antibiotic usage and collect outcome data until June, 2018. The Findings included: On 10/12/18 at 9:33 A.M., a review was conducted of the facility's Infection Control Program. The Assistant Director of Nursing (RN A) stated that she started an antibiotic stewardship when she began working at the facility in June, 2018. The Director Of Nursing (Administration B) agreed. The Director of Nursing stated that the facility did not have any documentation that an antibiotic stewardship program was developed and implemented prior to June 2018. On 10/12/18 a review was conducted of facility documentation, revealing an Antibiotic Stewardship Policy dated December, 2016. It read, Antibiotic usage and outcome data will be collected and documented using a facility-approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. The data will be used to guide decisions for improvement of individual resident antibiotic prescribing practices and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-12 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, facility staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed for Resident #28 of the survey sample of 26 residents, to ensure the right to be informed of treatment risks, and alternatives of psychotropic medications. The facility staff failed to fully inform Resident #28's Responsible Party of the increased risk of death from Seroquel, and possible alternatives. The Findings included: Resident #28 was a [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #28's diagnosis included Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Lobar pneumonia, Chronic Kidney Disease, Heart Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with hyperglycemia, and Dependence on Renal Dialysis. The Minimum Data Set, an Annual Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 6/4/18, coded Resident #28 as not having any behavioral issues. On 10/12/18 a review of Resident #28's clinical record was conducted, revealing a care plan. It read, Problem onset: 6/4/18, receives…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-12 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to obtain a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) prior to admission for 1 resident (Resident #53) of 26 residents in the survey sample. For Resident #53, the facility did not receive or review the PASARR prior to admission. The findings included: Resident #53, a [AGE] year old, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Vascular dementia with behaviors, delirium, hypertension and hyperlipidemia. The most recent Minimum Data Set assessment was an admission assessment with an assessment reference date of 10/1/18. The resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 1 indicating severe cognitive impairment. On multiple occasions, Resident #53 was observed seated near the nursing station sleeping in his wheelchair. Resident #53's PASARR was not located in the clinical record. On 10/11/18, facility staff were asked to provide the document. The document was provided the following day. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility failed, for one resident (Resident #35) in a survey sample of 26 residents, to complete a comprehensive care plan. 1. For Resident #35, the facility failed to devise a plan for patient-centered activities pertaining to the potential for sensory deprivation and isolation. The findings include: Resident #35, a [AGE] year old male, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include hypertension, dementia, gastroesophageal reflux, dysphagia, contractures, and hypothyroidism. Resident #35 has bilateral above-the-knee amputations and receives tube feedings via gastrostomy tube. Resident # 35's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) had an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/10/2018. Resident #35 did not have a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score recorded but cognitive skills for daily decision-making were coded as severely impaired. Hearing ability was coded minimally difficult and vision was coded as severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to revise the care plan for 3 residents (Resident #56, #6, and #13) of 26 residents in the survey sample. 1. Resident #56's care plan did not address pain management. 2. The facility failed to revise the care plan and provide a bed alarm as ordered for Resident # 6. 3. For Resident #13, the facility failed to revise the care plan when the antipsychotic medication was initiated on 09/10/2018. The findings included: 1. Resident #56's care plan did not address pain management. Resident #56, a [AGE] year old, was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hip and rib fracture, osteoarthritis, depression, diabetes, and hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set assessment was a quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date of 10/2/18. The resident was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 13 indicating no cognitive impairment. She was coded to have frequent pain making it hard to sleep and limiting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and facility documentation, the facility failed to assess and provide on-going resident-centered activities for one Resident (Resident #35) out of a sample of 26 residents. Resident #35 was observed to be in his room for 3 days without getting out of bed and with no meaningful activities provided. In addition, between 07/02/2018 through 08/12/2018 the resident only attended two church services, a bible study, and two exercise sessions. The findings included: Resident #35, a [AGE] year old male, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include hypertension, dementia, gastroesophageal reflux, dysphagia, contractures, and hypothyroidism. Resident #35 has bilateral above-the-knee amputations and receives tube feedings via gastrostomy tube. Resident # 35's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) had an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/10/2018. Resident #35 did not have a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score recorded but cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2018-10-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the highest practicable well being for 1 resident (Resident #25) in a survey sample of 26 residents. Resident #25 did not have on her physician ordered TEDS (clot preventing/treatment of edema) stockings during the days of survey. The findings included: Resident # 25 was admitted to the facility 8-14-17. Her diagnoses included but were not limited to: high blood pressure, dementia and arthritis. Resident #25's most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8-21-18 was coded as an admission assessment. Resident #25 was coded as having a BIMS (Brief Interview for Memory Status) Score of 2 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. She was coded as needing extensive to total assistance of one staff member to perform her activities of daily living. On 10/10/18 at 12:58 PM: Resident #25 was observed in the dining room. There were no TED stockings in place. Review of the active physician's order dated 10-26-17 revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide toileting supervision and implement fall interventions for 2 residents (Resident #56, #6) of 26 residents in the survey sample. 1. Resident #56 required total dependence of one staff while toileting. She was observed alone on the toilet in her room. 2. For Resident #6, the facility failed to implement a bed alarm as a fall intervention. The findings included: 1. Resident #56 required total dependence of one staff while toileting. She was observed alone on the toilet in her room. Resident #56, a [AGE] year old, was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hip and rib fracture, osteoarthritis, depression, diabetes, and hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set assessment was a quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date of 10/2/18. The resident was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 13 indicating no cognitive impairment. She was coded to require total dependence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to implement a toileting program for 1 resident (Resident #56) of 26 residents in the survey sample. Resident #56 was not toileted every 2 hours as ordered. The findings included: Resident #56, a [AGE] year old, was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hip and rib fracture, osteoarthritis, depression, diabetes, and hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set assessment was a quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date of 10/2/18. The resident was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 13 indicating no cognitive impairment. She was coded to require total dependence of one staff person while toileting. It was coded that a urinary and bowel toileting program were being used. On 9/21/18, Resident #56 fell and broke her hip and ribs. She returned to the facility after a four day hospital stay. Some of the falls Resident #56 sustained at the facility involved the resident trying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to provide pain management for 1 resident (Resident #56) of 26 residents in the survey sample. Resident #56 expressed having pain but did not have pain management in place. The findings included: Resident #56, a [AGE] year old, was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included hip and rib fracture, osteoarthritis, depression, diabetes, and hypertension. The most recent Minimum Data Set assessment was a quarterly assessment with an assessment reference date of 10/2/18. The resident was coded with a Brief Interview of Mental Status score of 13 indicating no cognitive impairment. She was coded to require total dependence of one staff person while toileting. She was coded to have frequent pain making it hard to sleep and limiting daily activities. On 9/21/18, Resident #56 fell and broke her hip and ribs. She returned to the facility after a four day hospital stay. On 10/10/18 at 1:15 p.m., an interview was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2018-10-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview facility documentation review, the facility pharmacy failed, for 1 resident (#28) to report irregularities in monthly reviews. 1. For Resident #28 the facility pharmacy failed to identify a contraindication with Seroquel and Dementia. The Findings included: Resident #28 was a [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #28's diagnosis included Dementia with Behavioral Disturbance, Lobar pneumonia, Chronic Kidney Disease, Heart Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with hyperglycemia, and Dependence on Renal Dialysis. The Minimum Data Set, an Annual Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 6/4/18, coded Resident #28 as not having any behavioral issues. On 10/12/18 a review of Resident #28's clinical record was conducted, revealing a care plan. It read, Problem onset: 6/4/18, receives psychotropic medication due to diagnosis of psychosis. Psychosis is not an official diagnosis. Resident #28's care plan did not address dementia care and services. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
ENH LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 05/01/2022
JCR OPS, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2022
SJ OPS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2022
EDMANDS, ANTHONYIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2022
SWAIN, WILLIAMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2022
WHITE, JANETIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2022
EMPORIA MEDICAL ASSOCIATES PCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense20% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 15%Other / private 10%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$291per resident / day
operating cost
$8,856per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$317per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495199. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-07-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next