The Springs Nursing & Rehab Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.38 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 66% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 55.2 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.46 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

16 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to store food properly in the main kitchen; dried food and meat were not labeled. The Findings Include: On 9/18/23 at 11:45 AM, the initial kitchen tour was conducted with the dietary manager (other staff, OS #2). The dry storage room yielded opened bulk bags of sugar, powdered gravy, and flour without dates indicating when the item was opened or when the item was to be used by. When asked about the opened containers, OS #2 said that the items should have been dated with an open date and an use by date. The reach-in refrigerator was then observed, a storage bag of approximately 15 leftover cooked pork links was also found without a label indicating when it was placed in the refrigerator (opened) or the use by date. OS #2 verbalized that the bag should have been labeled with the item contents and a use by date. OS #2 then took the bag from the refrigerator and disposed of it. On 9/19/23 at 4:00 PM, the administrator and director of nursing were notified of the above finding. A facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-09-20 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to accurately assess and document pnemococcal vaccine status for one of five resident records reviewed: Resident # 17. Findings include: On 9/19/23 beginning at 11:00 a.m., five resident records were reviewed for immunization status. Resident # 17 was identified as having no documentation of either having been administered or having declined the pneumonia vaccine. On 9/19/23 at 1:30 p.m., the DON (director of nursing) was asked for assistance in locating the information. On 9/20/23 at 8:30 a.m., the DON stated, I have a declination form in my notebook that was signed by the son on 5/29/23. I became DON in March 2023 and started looking at all of this, which is when I got the signed declination form . The DON was then questioned about the MDS (minimum data set) assessment for Resident # 17; noting the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], the admission MDS assessment for Section O0300 documented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on employee file review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to follow the abuse policy for two of 25 employee files reviewed. Two employee files did not have a background investigation check obtained. Findings include: On 9/19/23 beginning at 2:00 p.m., 25 employee files were reviewed. Two files did not include background investigation checks. On 9/19/23 at 3:20 p.m., the payroll/benefit administrator, identified as Other Staff (OS) # 1, was interviewed. OS # 1 stated, We looked at that, and the previous human resource person did not print it off. I have the print out that the money and forms were sent, but if I print off the reference check, it will have today's date since it wasn't printed off and filed in the employee's record at the time it came back. The DON (director of nursing) was asked for a copy of the abuse policy 9/19/23 at 3:45 p. m. The policy Abuse,Neglect, and Exploitation included I. Screening. A. Potential employees will be screened for a history of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property. 1. Background, reference,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of twenty residents (Resident #7). The findings include: Resident #7 (R7) had no care plan developed regarding moisture associated skin damage (MASD). R7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia with agitation, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hypertension, diabetes, major depressive disorder, dysphagia, chronic kidney disease, restless leg syndrome and atrial fibrillation. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R7 with severely impaired cognitive skills, always incontinent of bladder, occasionally incontinent of bowel, and as requiring extensive assistance of one person for toileting. R7's clinical record documented a 8/26/23 nursing note which read in part, CNA [certified nurses' aide] alerted this nurse of resident with scant amount of bleeding present on resident's brief when being taken to the shower. Resident was assessed to find a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-09-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to assess and/or initiate treatment for skin impairments for two of twenty residents (Resident #7 and #9) and failed to follow standards of care for medication administration during a medication pass observation on one of two units (100 hall). The findings include: 1. Resident #7 (R7) had no initial or ongoing assessments of an open skin area/rash on the buttocks that was treated daily by nursing staff. R7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia with agitation, gastroesophageal reflux disease, hypertension, diabetes, major depressive disorder, dysphagia, chronic kidney disease, restless leg syndrome and atrial fibrillation. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R7 with severely impaired cognitive skills, always incontinent of bladder, occasionally incontinent of bowel, and as requiring extensive assistance of one person for toileting. R7's clinical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility documents, the facility failed to ensure food was stored in a manner to ensure food safety, and kitchen staff failed follow proper handwashing procedures. The findings were: 1. At approximately 9:30 a.m. on 8/9/2022, during a tour of the Kitchen, the following was observed in the reach-in cooler: An open package of lunch meat in a zip-lock bag was undated. Asked about the lunch meat, the Dietary Manager said, That's sliced ham. An open package of grated cheese, identified by the Dietary Manager as Mozzarella, wrapped in saran wrap was undated. An open package of grated cheese, identified by the Dietary Manager as Parmesan, wrapped in saran wrap was undated. An open package of lunch meat, identified by the Dietary Manger as sliced turkey, wrapped in saran wrap was undated. A pitcher, approximately one-quarter full of what appeared to be orange drink, was not labeled or dated. A pitcher full of what appeared to be fruit drink was not labeled or dated. The Dietary Manager acknowledged the food items were not dated or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-08-10 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on complaint investigation, clinical record review, staff interview, and family interview, the facility staff failed for one of 18 residents in the survey sample, Resident # 58, to offer compassionate care visits. The family of Resident # 58 was not offered compassionate care visits while visitation in the facility was restricted. The findings were: Resident # 58 was admitted with diagnosed that included chronic systolic congestive heart failure, hypertension, chronic atrial fibrillation, dysphagia, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, hypothyroidism, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, pneumonia, and generalized muscle weakness. The resident was in the facility for five days and left before completion of the admission Minimum Data Set. According to a complaint narrative written by the resident's daughter-in-law, the resident was married for 67 years and was upset that, due to COVID, was only able to visit his wife through a window. The daughter-in-law also wrote that during telephone conversation, the resident said, I just want to go ahead and die, and was begging to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-08-10 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate MDS (minimum data set) assessment for one of 18 resident's in the survey sample. Resident #59's discharge MDS assessment was coded as being discharged to the hospital instead of home. The Findings Include: Diagnoses for Resident #59 included: Compression fracture, dementia, adult failure to thrive, and dehydration. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was an admission assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/17/22. Resident #59's cognitive score was a 11 indicating moderately cognitively intact. During a closed record review, Resident #59 was added to the sample as a hospital discharge review. On 8/10/22 Resident #59's clinical record was reviewed. Section A2100 of Resident #59's discharge MDS (dated 5/26/22) documented Resident #59 had been discharged to Acute Hospital. Review of Resident #59's progress notes dated 5/26/22 read in part Resident being discharged to home today. On 08/10/22 at 2:15 PM, during a meeting with the director of nursing, administrator, and unit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-08-10 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure one of 18 residents (Resident #32) had a targeted resident review coordinated with the appropriate state designated authority according to the Level II PASARR (pre-admission screening and resident review). Findings include: Resident #32's diagnoses included, but were not limited to: major depressive disorder, severe recurrent psychotic symptoms, dependent personality disorder, and bipolar disorder. The resident's most recent MDS (minimum data set) was an annual assessment dated [DATE]. This MDS assessed the resident with a cognitive score of 15 indicating the resident was intact for daily decision making skills. This MDS also assessed the resident with major depressive disorder, recurrent, severe with psych symptoms in Section I. (I0020B. Primary Medical Condition ICD). Resident #32 triggered in the LTCSP system for 'No PASARR with diagnoses'. The resident's clinical records were reviewed and no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility failed to develop care plans for two of 18 resident's in the survey sample. Resident #7 did not have a care plan for antidepressant medication and mood. Resident #27 did not have a complete care plan for tube feeding care and management. The Findings Include: 1. Diagnoses for Resident #7 included: Respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety, and depression. The most current MDS (minimum data set) was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/5/22. Resident #7's cognitive score was a 15 indicating cognitively intact. Section D0200 (B) documented Resident #7 had felt down, depressed, or hopeless 7 to 11 days of the 14 day look back period. On 8/10/22 Resident #7's physician orders were reviewed and documented Sertraline 200 MG (milligrams) and Trazadone 100 MG (antidepressants) were ordered daily for depression and anxiety. Resident #7's care plan was then reviewed and did not evidence a care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 80% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $302K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA