Kendal At Lexington

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

61.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 80 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 46 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.40 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 69% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 40.0 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.16 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.10 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.15 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.31 to 0.79 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility failed to provide staff assistance and supervision for a safe transfer for one of sixteen residents (Resident #1), resulting in a fall with fracture (harm). The findings include: Resident #1 (R1) fell when a privately hired companion/sitter attempted to transfer R1 from the bed to a wheelchair. The private companion did not request facility staff assistance with the transfer and had no prior documented training of facility policies that prohibited private caregivers/companions from performing direct-care activities, including transfers. R1 was diagnosed with a right distal femur fracture, as a result of the fall, and required treatment with immobilization and pain medication. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia, hypertension, osteoporosis, urinary tract infection, osteoarthritis, conjunctivitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and depression. The minimum data set (MDS -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections having the potential to affect residents on 2 of 2 nursing units. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to respond to and implement quarantine and testing measures in accordance with CDC (The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) recommendations to manage COVID-19 during an outbreak affecting 1 of 2 units. On 4/22/24 at 4:19 p.m., and again on 4/23/24 at 08:35 a.m., interviews were conducted with the facility's infection preventionist (IP). The IP stated that when they have a COVID case they start a line tracking to track exposure. The facility had a COVID outbreak that began on 3/15/24. The IP reported that they conducted staff testing on days 1, 3 and 5-7. Residents were tested on [DATE] and 3/18/24, both instances revealed additional…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review the facility staff failed to prepare, store, and distribute food in a sanitary manner. The finding included: The dietary staff failed to label open food with an open date and the use by date, failed to dispose of out of date products, failed to ensure metal serving pans were dry before nesting, failed to clean the grill after use, failed to clean trays in the refrigerator after spills occurred, failed to hold proper food temperatures on the steam tables on the units, and failed to ensure beard guards were worn by applicable staff. On 4/22/24 at 10:59 AM, observations were made in the main kitchen during a tour with the dietary manager (other staff #5, OS#5). During the tour of the walk-in refrigerator there was an open bag of tortilla shells with no open or expiration date, 2 bags of unopened tortilla shells out of the original box with no expiration date, 6 quarts of 2% milk that were expired (4/21/24), 3 trays with tan color sour smelling…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-24 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain an antibiotic stewardship program to monitor antibiotic use for three residents (Resident #1- R1, Resident #34- R34, and Resident #27- R27) in a survey sample of 3 residents reviewed for antibiotic use. The findings included: On 4/23/24 at 08:48 a.m., an interview was conducted with the facility's infection preventionist (IP). The IP was asked about the antibiotic stewardship program and was asked to explain the facility's process. The IP reported that she doesn't track any infections other than COVID-19. She also reported that, we do have a PIP (performance improvement plan) in place I just created for UTIs (urinary tract infections), we are going to do education with staff on using McGreer criteria to reduce our UTI's. During the above interview the IP was asked when the PIP was developed and when they identified the deficient practice. The IP reported that it was just created last Tuesday, and the steps had not been taken/implemented yet. When the surveyor…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure that residents receive adequate assistance devices to prevent accidents for one resident (Resident #103- R103), in a survey sample of 18 residents. The findings included, For R103, who had two recent incidents, the facility staff failed to ensure the resident had a call bell in reach when sitting in the recliner in her room, to prevent further incidents/accidents. On 6/24/24, the facility administrator provided the survey team with a listing of residents who had recently had incidents. R103 was identified on the list to have had 2 incidents of falls on 6/20/24. On 6/25/24, a clinical record review was conducted of R103's chart. According to the nursing note dated 6/20/24 at 17:30, it read in part, Incident time: 16:30, Incident Type: Falls, Reason for Incident: CNA [certified nursing assistant] called this nurse to RR [resident room]. Rsd's [resident's] recliner back/head had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow abuse prevention policies for completion of a criminal background check for a privately hired companion for one of sixteen residents in the survey sample (Resident #1). The findings include: A private companion/sitter working in the facility with Resident #1, had no prior criminal background check as required by the facility's abuse prevention policies. Resident #1 (R1) was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included dementia, hypertension, osteoporosis, urinary tract infection, osteoarthritis, conjunctivitis, gastroesophageal reflux disease, and depression. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed R1 with severely impaired cognitive skills and required the extensive assistance of two people for bed mobility and transfers. R1's clinical record documented the resident fell on 4/24/24 when a privately hired companion (other staff #3) attempted to transfer the resident from bed to a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan for one resident (Resident #7- R7), in a survey sample of 16 residents. The findings included: For R7, the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan to include to resident's inability to use a straw in beverages due to the risk of aspiration. On 4/22/24 at the lunch meal, R7 was observed in the dining room and was observed to have several episodes of coughing while eating. The meal/tray ticket for R7 was observed and it was noted that it indicated no straws. A straw was not being used. On 04/22/24 at 03:47 p.m., R7 was visited in their room. It was observed that R7 had a sign in the room that stated, please no straws. I am unable to use straws. R7 was asked about this and reported she can't use a straw because she gets choked. On 04/22/24 at 03:52 p.m., an interview was conducted with CNA #1 (certified nursing assistant). CNA #1 stated that R7 is being evaluated, they think with using a straw…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of care for one of sixteen residents in the survey sample (Resident #29). The findings include: During a medication pass observation, a medication was not administered and was left in Resident #29's room. The nurse signed off the clinical record indicating administration of the medicine without witnessing that the resident took the medicine. Resident #29 had no assessed ability to safely self-administer the medication. On 4/23/24 at 8:00 a.m., licensed practical nurse (LPN #1) was observed preparing and administering medications to Resident #29 (R29). Medications prepared for R29 included Peroxyl 1.5% oral rinse, 10 milliliters (mls) in a plastic medicine cup. After oral medications were administered, LPN #1 placed the cup of Peroxyl oral rinse on the resident's sink and advised R29 that the rinse was at the sink for use after breakfast and brushing teeth. LPN #1 signed off R29's medication administration record indicating the Peroxyl…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide ADL (activities of daily living) assistance for a resident who was dependent on facility staff, affecting one Resident (Resident #7) in a survey sample of 16 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #7 (R7), the facility staff failed to provide assistance with oral care/brushing of teeth. On 4/22/24 at 11:59 a.m., R7 was interviewed in their room. R7 was sitting in a wheelchair at the bedside. It was observed that R7's teeth had a film on them and did not appear clean. R7 was questioned about oral care and R7 reported they had not brushed her teeth. On 4/22/24 at approximately 3:45 p.m., R7 was visited in her room again and it was noted that the teeth still had a visible film on them and R7 reported her teeth had not been brushed. On 4/22/24 at 3:54 p.m., an interview was conducted with CNA #1 (certified nursing assistant). CNA #X reported that oral care is provided daily. When asked about R7, CNA #1 reported that she had not…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care, consistent with professional standards of practice, for one resident (Resident #187- R187) in a survey sample of 16 residents. The findings included: For R187, the facility staff failed to store the oxygen nasal cannula to prevent contamination and failed to change the tubing and humidification bottle weekly as per physician order and facility protocol. On 04/22/24 at 11:41 AM, R187 was visited in their room. R187 was lying in bed and an oxygen (O2) concentrator was observed at the bedside, not on/running. The O2 humidification bottle was dated 4/9/24, and the nasal cannula was sitting on top of the concentrator, open to air and dated 4/9/24. R187 reported they no longer use oxygen. On 04/22/24 at 03:27 PM, a clinical record review was conducted. It was noted that R187 had a physician order for 3 liters of oxygen per nasal cannula as needed to maintain oxygen saturation levels >90%. There was another order that read, change 02 tubing every Tuesday on night shift…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review the facility staff failed to respond to pharmacy recommendations for 2 of 16 residents in the survey sample. (Resident # 22 and Resident # 10). The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to respond to a pharmacist recommendation to attempt a gradual dose reduction of buspirone for Resident # 22 (R22). R22 had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's Disease, Parkinson's Disease, depression, unspecified dementia, mood disorder, and anxiety disorder. The most current minimum data set (MDS), a quarterly assessment dated [DATE] assessed R22 with severe cognitive impairment. Review of R22 clinical record documented a physician's order dated 12/27/23 for buspirone 5 mg, give 5 mg by mouth three a day as needed for generalized anxiety disorder. On 1/8/24 the physician changed the order to read, give buspirone 5 mg, give 5 mgby mouth 2 times a day for anxiety disorder. On 1/02/24 the consulting pharmacist recommended a gradual dose…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$10,033 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,033 — penalty dated 2024-04-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to KENDAL — 5 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $671K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA