The Chesapeake

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 139 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 66.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 104 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 52 beds and averages 45.5 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.31 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.51 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-12-04 · tag F0732 — widespread
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interview, resident interviews and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure staffing information was posted on one of one unit in a prominent place and readily accessible to all residents, staff and visitors. The findings included:During the initial tour of the facility on 12/2/2025, there was no observation of the daily posting of the nurse staffing information on the nursing unit. On the second day of survey (12/3/2025), no nurse staffing information was observed on the unit. On 12/3/2025 during a medication pass and pour observation, an interview was conducted with an alert resident who stated he did not know how to determine how many staff members were working.On 12/3/2025 at approximately 12:40 p.m. during lunch time, a visitor was interviewed about the nurse staffing. The visitor stated she did not know where that information was located. On 12/3/2025 at 1:00 p.m., a group interview was conducted by another surveyor with five alert and oriented individuals. The surveyor reported that each resident stated that they did not know…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0574 — pattern
  The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility documentation, the facility's staff failed to ensure residents were aware of their right to contact the Ombudsman to advocate for them and of their right to file a complaint with the state certification agency. The findings included:On 12/03/25, during the group resident interview, none of the five residents (#2, #11, #21, #31, #43), that attended were aware of what or who the Ombudsman was or how to contact them. Also, none of the five residents in attendance were aware that they could make a complaint with the state agency or where they could find the information to do so. An interview was conducted with the facility's Activities Director (AD) and the Administrator on 12/03/25, at approximately 4:00 PM. The Administrator states that Resident Rights are addressed on admission and discussed in Resident Council Meetings and in the Resident Handbook. An interview was conducted with the admissions coordinator (AC) on 12/04/25 at approximately 11:30 AM. The AC stated it was a collaborative effort by all facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0577 — pattern
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure the survey results book was readily accessible to residents, family members and legal representatives of residents. The findings included:On 12/02/25 at approximately 2:00 PM., during the facility tour, in the main hall leading to the Health Center Unit a sign was observed on the bulletin board that read Survey Book is available upon request in the main office. On 12/03/25, an interview was conducted with the Administrator concerning the survey book accessibility. The administrator stated that they initially had the survey book available to everyone without needing to request access, but it was moved to the office during construction. On 12/03/25, during the end-of-day meeting, the Administrator, Director of Nursing (DON), and Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) were made aware of the findings, and no further information was provided.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and facility documentation, the facility's staff failed to ensure residents were aware of how to file a grievance or complaint. The findings included:On 12/03/25, during the group resident interview, none of the five residents (#2, #11, #21, #31, #43), that attended, were aware of the availability, or how to file a grievance or complaint. An interview was conducted with the facility's Activities Director (AD) and the Administrator on 12/03/25, at approximately 4:00 PM. The Administrator stated that Resident Rights, including how to file a grievance or complaint, are addressed on admission and discussed in Resident Council Meetings and in the Resident Handbook. An interview was conducted with the admissions coordinator (AC) on 12/04/25 at approximately 11:30 AM. The AC stated it was a collaborative effort of all facility staff and leadership to inform residents on where to find information regarding their rights and that it is addressed on admission and at Resident Meetings. The facility's policy titled Resident's Rights, was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 3 Residents (#19, #1 and #42) in a survey sample of 24 Residents. The findings included:1. The facility staff failed to ensure oxygen nasal canula and concentrator tubing were changed according to the physician's order for Resident #19. Resident #19 was admitted to the facility originally on 06/22/2022 and most recently readmitted on [DATE]. On 12/02/2025 at 01:15 PM, an observation was made of Resident #19's oxygen nasal canula and concentrator tubing dated 11/23/2025; the humidification bottle attached to the oxygen concentrator was not dated. A review of the clinical record revealed that the orders for oxygen read: Clean oxygen concentrator and filter, change tubing weekly (every (Q) 7 days). The MAR (Medication Administration Record) was signed off as changed on 11/16/2025 and 11/23/25. On 12/2/25, an interview was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-04 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility's staff failed to offer and provide snacks at bedtime. The findings included:There were no observations during this survey from 12/02/2025-12/04/2025 of snacks being offered or provided to residents. On 12/03/2025, during the resident group meeting/interview, five Residents (#2, #11, #21, #31, #43) stated that they did not receive nor are they offered snacks mid-day or bedtime regularly. The residents said that it is rare to receive snacks at bedtime. The residents also stated that when they do get snacks, it is in connection with a planned activity. An interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (DM) on 12/03/25. The DM stated snacks are available to all units and residents, but is unsure about the distribution. On 12/04/2025, an interview was conducted with the Administrator, who stated they have snacks available but agreed that snacks are not offered consistently. On 12/04/25, at approximately 5:00 PM, the above findings were shared with the Administrator, Director of Nursing, and Assistant Director…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility staff failed to cover the catheter bag for 1 of 24 residents (Resident #48), in the survey sample. The findings included:Resident #48 was originally admitted to the facility 8/29/23. The current diagnoses included; urinary tract infection, multiple sclerosis, type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications, major depressive disorder, and muscle weakness. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 10/10/25 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #48's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact.On 12/2/25 at 3:30 PM during an observation tour it was observed that the catheter bag for Resident #48 was not covered with a privacy bag. On 12/2/25 at 3:35 PM a second observation tour was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON). The DON observed Resident #48's catheter bag uncovered and stated, there should be a cover…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's right to personal privacy and confidentiality of her personal and medical record. Personal privacy includes accommodation, medical treatment, written and telephone communications, personal care, visits, and meetings of family and resident groups. The resident has a right to secure confidential personal and medical records. Findings include:The facility failed to ensure privacy and confidentiality of the medical record for 1 resident in survey sample of 24 residents. Resident #49.On 12/2/25, during a clinical record review for Resident #18, a progress note revealed an entry containing the name of another resident, Resident #49. 11/29/2025 21:56 NOTE TEXT: While working at admin desk M.A stated resident (#18) was seated on opposite side of the counter talking with Resident #49 (name redacted). M.A noticed a motion out of corner her eye with the W/C tipping forward. Resident #18 (name redacted) was reaching out towards Resident #49 (name…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that meets professional standards of quality care for one (1) of 24 residents (Resident #18) in the survey sample. The findings included: On 12/3/25 during a clinical record review, it was discovered that Resident #18 did not have a baseline care plan. The first care plan was created on 11/10/25, seven (7) days after admission.Resident #18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to rhabdomyolysis (a rare muscle injury where severely damaged or injured skeletal muscles rapidly breakdown), displaced fracture of the first cervical vertebra, pulmonary hypertension, history of pneumonia, depression, heart failure, cognitive communication deficit and osteoporosis. Her most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 11/7/25…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure the timeliness of each resident's person-centered, comprehensive care plan, and to ensure that the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by an interdisciplinary team for three (3) of 24 residents (Residents #14, #2, and #18) in the survey sample.Findings include: 1. 1. For Resident #14, the facility staff failed to update her comprehensive care plan to reflect her speaking more Italian and her use of an elbow extension splint. Resident #14 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including but not limited to non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, major depressive disorder, hypertensive chronic kidney disease, contracture, iron deficiency anemia, pain, unspecified, vascular dementia, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder and cerebrovascular disease. Her most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) with an ARD (Assessment Reference Date) of 10/28/25 Section C0500 coded the resident as having a BIMS (Brief Interview of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 26 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA