No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Hiram W Davis Medical Ctr

26317 West Washington Street, Petersburg, VA 23803 · Government - State · 90 certified beds · (804) 524-7420 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (804) 524-7420 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Mar 2019Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (22) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ)Not rated
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
20901 Chesterfield Ave · (804) 526-3500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
26036 Cox Rd · (804) 863-4922 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2128 W Washington St · (804) 861-4551 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1200 Farmer St · (804) 324-4014 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3212 W Washington St · (804) 722-8226

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased12.7%14.9%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.5%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection8.4%1.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms4.4%18.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained31.9%0.1%0.1%check this — see note marked dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.8%3.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.5%15.6%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication33.6%20.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.4%4.7%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control4.8%21.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table32.1%14.2%17.1%worse

This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

CMS has not published payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours for this facility yet — this can happen for newer, hospital-based, or recently-certified homes. It can also mean the home simply did not file, which CMS does not distinguish in this data, so treat the gap as unexplained rather than benign. Staffing is one of the three parts of the CMS star rating; where it’s missing, weigh the independent health-inspection score most, and ask the facility directly about its nurse-to-resident ratios and weekend RN coverage.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-12)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2022-03-17)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to complete monthly medication regimen reviews for (4) four of (5) five sampled residents, Resident #1, Resident #6, Resident #4, and Resident #5. The findings included:1. For Resident #1 the facility failed to ensure a monthly medication regimen review (MRR) was completed for the month of March 2025. Resident #1's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, chronic heart failure, atrial fibrillation, mild neurocognitive disorder, anxiety, agitation, peripheral vascular disease, psychosis, and visual hallucinations. The most recent annual minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/18/25, assigned the resident a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) summary score of 13 out of 15 for cognitive abilities, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #1's MRRs did not disclose a MRR was completed for March 2025. On 2/11/26 at 12:23 PM, the pharmacy director (PD) was interviewed and agreed the MRR was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure call bell was in reach for (1) one of (14) fourteen sampled residents, Resident #21. The findings included:Resident #21's clinical record listed diagnoses which included but not limited to acquired blindness of bilateral eyes, bilateral hearing loss, agitation, and schizoaffective schizophrenia.Resident #21's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 01/27/26 coded the resident as having both long- and short-term memory problems with moderately impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident #21's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a plan for At risk for falls. Interventions for this care plan include call light in reach.Surveyor observed Resident #21 on 02/10/26 at 12:50 pm. Resident #21 was seated in wheelchair beside bed. Surveyor observed Resident #21's call bell located on the floor behind the head of the bed.Surveyor observed Resident #21 on 02/11/26 at 8:45 am and 1:30 pm. Resident was lying in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living care for (1) one of (14) fourteen sampled residents, Resident #5. The findings included:For Resident #5 the facility staff failed to provide nail care.Resident #5's clinical record listed diagnoses which included but not limited to cerebrovascular accident (stroke) and hemiplegia or hemiparesis.Resident #5's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 01/20/26 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 12 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is moderately cognitively impaired. Section G, functional status coded the resident as needing substantial/maximal assistance with personal hygiene.Resident #5's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a plan for Self-care deficit. Interventions for this care plan include Provide appropriate level of assistance with ADL's (activities of daily living).Surveyor spoke with Resident #5…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow provider orders for medication administration for (1) one of (14) fourteen sampled residents, Resident #7. The findings included:For Resident #7, the facility staff failed to administer a provider ordered medications acetaminophen, chlorpromazine, divalproex, docusate, duloxetine, eucerin cream, gabapentin, menthol-zinc oxide ointment, and senna, on the evening of 1/20/26. Resident #7's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to, pain of left/right leg, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, constipation, depression, and soft tissue disorder. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/23/25, assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 11 out of 15 for cognitive abilities, indicating the resident was moderately impaired in cognition. A review of a medical provider orders disclosed the following ordered medications: .acetaminophen.650 mg (milligrams).BID (twice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate clinical record for (1) one of (14) fourteen sampled residents, Resident #1. The findings included:For Resident #1, the facility staff failed to accurately document medication regimen reviews (MRRs) for no irregularities on 2/21/25, 4/10/25, 5/15/25, 6/16/25, 7/25/25, 8/29/25, 9/18/25, 10/17/25, 11/12/25, 12/16/25, and 1/22/26. Resident #1's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, chronic heart failure, atrial fibrillation, mild neurocognitive disorder, anxiety, agitation, peripheral vascular disease, psychosis, and visual hallucinations. The most recent annual minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/18/25, assigned the resident a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) summary score of 13 out of 15 for cognitive abilities, indicating the resident was cognitively intact. A review of Resident #1's MRRs for 2/21/25, 4/10/25, 5/15/25, 6/16/25, 7/25/25, 8/29/25, 9/18/25, 10/17/25, 11/12/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-17 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to offer and provide the flu and /or pneumonia vaccines to 3 Residents (Resident #1, #27, #247) in a survey sample of 5 Resident's reviewed for flu and pneumonia immunizations. The findings included: On 3/15/22, the facility staff were asked to provide any and all evidence regarding flu and pneumonia immunizations for the survey sample of 5 Residents selected for review of immunizations. On 3/16/22, the requested information was reviewed and revealed the following: 1. Resident #1 had no information submitted to indicate that the Resident had received the flu or pneumonia vaccine or had a history of receiving it previously. 2. For Resident #27, the facility submitted a progress note from a medical provider/nurse practitioner that was dated 3/22/21, and read, Legal guardian gave permission for flu immunization. No further information was provided. 3. For Resident #247, the facility submitted no information regarding flu and pneumonia immunizations. On the COVID immunization…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-03-17 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — pattern
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to conduct COVID-19 testing as required for 105 facility staff who were not up-to-date with COVID-19 vaccinations, out of a total of 205 employees. The findings included: On 3/15/22, the facility staff submitted evidence of tracking the community transmission rates. This revealed: 12/6/21-3/8/22, the community rate of transmission was noted as high. On 3/13/22, the community rate of transmission was noted as low. The facility submitted evidence that for the week of, 3/7/22-3/13/22, only 17 employees were tested for COVID-19. Review of the facility staff vaccination matrix revealed the following data: 210 total employees, 105 who are up to date with COVID immunizations, 94 who are not up to date (have not received boosters), and 11 with granted/approved exemptions. On 3/16/22 at 3:08 PM, a group interview was held with the Director of Nursing (DON), Employee C the Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) and RN B, the employee health nurse. The ADON said that she and RN B conduct the employee testing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-03-17 · tag F0888 — isolated
    Ensure staff are vaccinated for COVID-19
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to develop COVID-19 vaccination policies for staff that include all of the required components, failed to track the immunization status of all facility employees, and failed to ensure 100% of facility staff were vaccinated, the facility vaccination rate was 98.1%. 1. The facility failed to develop COVID-19 policies that included the implementation of additional precautions to mitigate the transmission of COVID-19, for staff who are not fully vaccinated for COVID-19. 2. The facility failed to include 3 staff members of the vaccination tracking and were unaware of their vaccination status. 3. The facility staff failed to ensure 1 staff member had an appropriate request for a medical exemption. 4. The facility staff vaccination rate for COVID-19 was 98.1%. The findings included: 1. The facility failed to develop COVID-19 policies that included the implementation of additional precautions to mitigate the transmission of COVID-19, for staff who are not fully vaccinated for COVID-19. On 3/15/22, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-03-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure professional practice standards for medication administration for 4 residents (Resident #38, Resident #2, Resident 11 # , Resident #13 ) in a sample size of 21. 1. For Resident #38, the facility staff failed to administer medications via gastrostomy tube according to professional practice standards. 2. For Resident # 2, the facility staff failed to document the administration of medications as ordered by the physician 3. For Resident #11 the facility staff failed to follow physicians order and administered Tramadol twice in one day when it was ordered daily at 6:30 AM. 4. For Resident #13, the facility staff failed to obtain weights as ordered by the physician The findings include: 1. For Resident #38, the facility staff failed to administer medications via gastrostomy tube according to professional practice standards. Resident #38, a [AGE] year old male, was admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2019-03-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview the facility staff failed to transport linen in a manner to prevent the spread of infection in one of two dining areas. In one of two dining areas during meal service the facility staff failed to distribute clothing protectors in a manner to prevent the spread of infection. The findings included: On 3/27/19 from 11:11am until 11:21am, during observation of meal service on the third floor, CNA F (certified nursing assistant) , CNA G, and LPN D (licensed practical nurse) were holding clothing protectors against their body, which was touching their clothing, while they were distributing the clothing protectors to residents. On 03/28/19 at 11:15 AM, during an interview with RN A, when asked how should staff transport linens, she replied staff would wash their hands, obtain linen for what they need, and carry it holding it not against their clothing or anything like that. On 3/28/19 at 2:26pm during a meeting with the Administrator and DON when asked what their expectations regarding linen transport, the DON replied, hold it in their hands, not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 12 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-28 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to complete a SNF ABN (Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice) for 3 Residents (Resident #300, Resident #301, Resident #23) in a survey sample of 21 Residents. 1. For Resident #300, the facility staff failed to provide a SNF ABN notice prior to skilled care services, paid by Medicare, ended. Resident #300 was not afforded the opportunity to continue skilled care services and have Medicare make a determination about coverage of such services. 2. For Resident #301, the facility staff failed to provide a SNF ABN notice prior to skilled care services, paid by Medicare, ended. Resident #301 was not afforded the opportunity to continue skilled care services and have Medicare make a determination about coverage of such services. 3. For resident #23, the facility staff failed to provide a SNF ABN notice prior to skilled care services, paid by Medicare, ended. Resident #23 was not afforded the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-28 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to implement their abuse and neglect policy. 1. For Resident #35 the facility staff failed to implement abuse and neglect policy for an injury of unknown origin. 2. For Resident #45, the facility staff failed to implement their policy and procedure of abuse for a fracture of unknown origin. The findings include: 1. For Resident #35 the facility staff failed to implement abuse and neglect policy for an injury of unknown origin. Note: This deficiency is the result of an investigation conducted in relation to (Facility Related Incident) FRI send to the Office of Licensure and Certification on 11/3/2017. The FRI indicated that Resident #25 had X-Rays that showed a possible fracture of knee as a result of an injury of unknown origin. Resident #35 a [AGE] year old woman was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to Schizophrenia, Involuntary Commitment, G-Tube feeding, Impaired mobility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review the facility staff failed to submit a 5 day follow up report to the State Agency for two residents (Resident #2 and #24) in a survey sample of 21 residents. 1. For Resident #2, the facility did not report the results of the investigation of an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency. Resident # 2 was found with a large raised area on the right side of her forehead on 9/29/18. 2. For Resident #24, the facility staff failed to report investigation results of an injury of unknown origin to the state agency. Resident #24 was found with bruising to her third and fifth fingers on her right hand. The findings included: 1. For Resident #2, the facility did not report the results of the investigation of an injury of unknown origin to the State Agency. Resident # 2 was found with a large raised area on the right side of her forehead on 9/29/18. Resident # 2, an [AGE] year old female, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin for 2 residents (Resident #24, Resident #45) out of a sample size of 21 residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #24, the facility staff failed to fully investigate an injury of unknown origin to ensure Resident #24 was not a victim of abuse. Resident #24 was found with bruising to her third and fifth fingers on her right hand. 2. For Resident #45, the facility staff failed to conduct an investigation for a fracture of unknown origin. The findings include: Resident #24, an [AGE] year old female, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include but not limited to vascular dementia, impaired mobility, spastic contracture of hands, motor paralysis lower extremities, and seizure disorder. Resident #24's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) had an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/21/2019 and was coded as a quarterly assessment. Resident #24…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise a careplan for one Resident (Resident #13) in a survey in survey sample of 21 Residents. For Resident #13, the facility staff failed to review and revise the careplan to include the correct viscosity of thickened liquids and the use of a restraint to the right hand. The findings included: Resident #13, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but were not limited to: dementia, GERD (gastro esophageal reflux disorder), glaucoma, incontinence of urine, self-injurious behavior, impaired mobility, TBI (traumatic brain injury) post MVA (motor vehicle accident), and atherosclerosis. Resident #13's most recent MDS (minimum data set) (an assessment tool) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 1/4/19 was coded as a quarterly assessment. Resident #13 was coded as daily decision making being severely impaired. The resident was also coded as being totally dependent, requiring the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure freedom from unnecessary drugs for 1 Resident (Resident #11) in a survey sample of 21 Residents. For Resident # 11 the facility staff administered Tramadol (narcotic pain medicine) 50 MG (Milligrams) twice on 3/27/19 when the order was for Tramadol 50 MG once daily at 6:30 AM. The findings included; Resident # 11 a [AGE] year old man, was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to Cerebral Palsy, Ulcerative Colitis, Seizure Disorder. On 3/27/19 during clinical record review it was noted on the Physicians Order Sheet that the Resident #11 had several orders for pain medication as follows: 1. Acetaminophen Soln [Tylenol solution] 650 MG /20 ML [Milliliters] Take 20 ML via G-Tube Every 12 Hours (at 1000 and 2200) [10 AM and 10 PM] as directed. 2. Acetaminophen Soln - Every 6 hours as needed for pain or temp 100.5 or above. Max of 4000 MG/day 3. Fentanyl 25 MCG/HR [Micrograms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure 2 Residents (Residents #35, and #46) were free from unnecessary psychotropic drugs in a survey sample of 21 Residents. 1. For Resident # 35, the facility staff used Ativan PRN (as needed) for more than 14 days without a diagnosis to support its continued use. 2. For Resident # 46 the facility staff only attempted 1 gradual dose reduction since start of Thioridazine 150 MG on 11/16/17 and no GDR for the other 3 psychotropic medications. The findings include: 1. For Resident # 35, the facility staff used Ativan PRN (as needed) for more than 14 days without a diagnosis to support its continued use. Resident #35 a [AGE] year old woman admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to Schizophrenia, Involuntary Commitment, G-Tube feeding, Impaired mobility, Bilateral hand contractures, Seizure Disorder, Dialysis Dependent, and depression. On 3/25/19 at 3:00 PM a clinical record review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. There were 2 medication errors (wrong time/wrong route potentials) and 25 opportunities resulting in an 8% error rate. The findings included: Resident #38, a [AGE] year old male, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses include but not limited to profound intellectual disability, chronic aspiration syndrome, reflux esophagitis, quadriplegia, and seizure disorder. Resident #38's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) had an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 02/25/2019 and was coded as a quarterly assessment. Resident #24 was not coded for a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS). Cognitive skills for daily decision-making were coded as severely impaired. Functional status for bed mobility, transfers, eating (tube feedings), dressing, and personal hygiene were all coded as total dependence on staff. On 03/27/2019 at 9:40 AM, LPN C was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to label and store medications according to manufacturer's specifications in one of two facility medication rooms. Specifically, the facility staff failed to: -date a multi-dose vial of Aplisol (tuberculin PPD) after accessing the vial -date a multi-dose vial of Novolog in accordance with manufacturer's specifications -store a multi-dose vial of Novolin N according to manufacturer's specifications The findings include: On 03/26/2019 at approximately 3:15 PM, the medication room on the second floor was surveyed. LPN A and this surveyor observed multi-dose vials in the refrigerator. An open box of Aplisol had a pharmacy label that documented, Stock on it. LPN A stated the facility has an in-house pharmacy that placed the label on the box. Inside the box was a multi-dose vial of Aplisol and it did not have a plastic top on it. When asked if that vial had been opened and accessed, LPN A stated, Yes. There was not a date on the bottle or the box to indicate when it was opened. LPN A held it in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-03-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate clinical record for 1 Resident (Resident # 3) in a survey sample of 21 Residents. For Resident #3 the facility staff failed to accurately document the intake of G-Tube feeding and flushes. The findings include: Resident #3 a [AGE] year old woman admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to intellectual Disability, G-Tube, and Aspiration syndrome, Cerebral Palsy with contractures of extremities, hyper salivation, incontinence, and weight loss from neglect. On 3/27/19 during clinical record review it was noted that Resident #3 had G-Tube feeding ordered and that there were a lot of blank spaces in the documentation from 1/1/19 to 3/27/19. The Tube feeding orders were as follows: Jevity 1.5 400 ML every 6 hours at 200 ML per hour over 2 hours. Flush with 300 ML of water every 6 hours. On January 2019 G-Tube Feeding Record there were empty spaces (no nurse's initials)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2019-03-28 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure equipment was in safe operating condition for one Resident (Resident #45) in a survey sample of 21 Residents. For Resident #45, the facility staff failed to maintain a bed in safe operating condition to prevent resident exposure to open electrical wiring. The findings included: Resident #45, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's diagnoses included but were not limited to: profound intellectual disability, Down's Syndrome with severe congenital hear disease, pulmonic stenosis, polycythemia secondary to chronic hypoxemia, chronic hypothyroidism, osteoporosis, Hepatitis B carrier, and self injurious behavior. Resident #45's most recent MDS (Minimum Data Set) (an assessment tool) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 12/5/18 was coded as a quarterly assessment. Resident #45 was coded as having severe cognitive impairment. The resident was also coded as requiring limited assistance of two staff members for transfers,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2022-03-17 · tag F0582 — widespread
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide appropriate and timely notices regarding Medicare Part A services ending and failed to submit a demand bill to Medicare, for 2 Residents (Resident #39 & #25) in a survey sample of 2 Residents reviewed for beneficiary notices. 1. For Resident #39, who requested skilled care services continue and Medicare be billed to make the determination, the facility staff failed to continue skilled care services and failed to allow Medicare to make the determination. 2. For Resident #25, the facility staff failed to provide the Resident's Representative (RR) with an advanced beneficiary notice (ABN) timely and failed to issue a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC). The findings included: On 3/16/22 at 6:27 PM, the facility Administrator submitted the listing of Residents discharged from skilled services without exhausting their benefit days. This list included two Residents, which were entered into the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BREWER, VICKIEIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/25/2021
GRIFFIN, JARVISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/11/2021

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495113. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next