No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Westminster-Canterbury Of Richmond

1600 Westbrook Ave, Richmond, VA 23227 · Non profit - Corporation · 158 certified beds · (804) 264-6000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (804) 264-6000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 14 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
Worth asking about
  • about 21% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
4807 Hermitage Rd Ste 102 · (804) 728-0290 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.4 mi
1157 Azalea Ave · (804) 261-4734 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1227 Bellevue Ave · (804) 262-7474 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2000 Park St · (804) 501-7275 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased40.1%14.9%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.0%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.4%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%18.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.3%3.6%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened33.9%15.6%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication38.9%20.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%94.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.3%4.7%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control31.2%21.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table24.7%14.2%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.7%73.6%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.0%22.3%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.3%11.5%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.261.521.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.571.481.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 313 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

65.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.43U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.20hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 190 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF65.9%CMS range 61.1–70.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.3%CMS range 8.3–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge61.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge62.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting75.3%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge99.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization4.8%CMS range 2.7–7.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.141.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.30
RN hours/ resident / day
0.66
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.79
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.75
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.05
RN hoursweekends
43.8%
Total nursing turnover
24.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 158 beds and averages 136.9 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.30 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.79 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.88 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.40 to 1.05 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-06-12)
4
at the previous standard inspection (2023-05-25)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

14 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for documentation for one of four residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include: For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed to document assessments, interventions, and vital signs in the clinical record on 10/19/24. A review of R1's nurses' progress notes revealed the following: 10/19/24 19:44 (7:44 p.m.) Resident remains lethargic. BP remains low 88/43. Resident responds to tactile and verbal stimuli. Has declined PO (by mouth) this evening. [Name of attending physician] updated. No new orders. 10/19/24 19:57 (7:57 p.m.) Per [name of attending physician] change Morphine to 15 mg (milligrams) every 8 hours and hold Metoprolol tonight. 10/20/24 01:15 (1:15 a.m.) Resident continues with lethargy, night medications of Morphine, Metoprolol held. Resident blood pressure decline 70/56 and repeat was 56/31. On call NP (nurse practitioner) notified. Gave order for transfer. This note was written by RN (registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete, accurate clinical record for one of four residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings include: For Resident #1 (R1), the facility staff failed maintain a complete, accurate medical record by documenting assessments, interventions, and vital signs in the clinical record on 10/19/24. A review of R1's nurses' progress notes revealed the following: 10/19/24 19:44 (7:44 p.m.) Resident remains lethargic. BP remains low 88/43. Resident responds to tactile and verbal stimuli. Has declined PO (by mouth) this evening. [Name of attending physician] updated. No new orders. 10/19/24 19:57 (7:57 p.m.) Per [name of attending physician] change Morphine to 15 mg (milligrams) every 8 hours and hold Metoprolol tonight. 10/20/24 01:15 (1:15 a.m.) Resident continues with lethargy, night medications of Morphine, Metoprolol held. Resident blood pressure decline 70/56 and repeat was 56/31. On call NP (nurse practitioner) notified. Gave order for transfer. This note…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, resident interview, facility document review and clinical record review, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure an assessment was completed for medication self-administration for one of 20 residents, Resident #30. The findings include: The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #30 was assessed for self-administration of medication. Resident #30 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included but were not limited to: osteoarthritis, spondylosis and bipolar disorder. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment, a quarterly assessment, with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/21/24, coded the resident as scoring a 15 out of 15 on the BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score, indicating the resident was not cognitively impaired. A review of the comprehensive care plan dated 7/19/23, which revealed, FOCUS: The resident has pain due to osteoarthritis and gout. INTERVENTIONS: Assess need for pain medication on each contact. Assess…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement the comprehensive care plan for one of 20 residents in the survey sample, Resident #76. The findings include: For Resident #76, (R76), the facility staff failed to implement the resident's comprehensive care plan for diabetic medication administration. A review of R76's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 1/31/24 for Basaglar KwikPen U-100 insulin, 100 units/milliliter- 10 units once daily for diabetes. The order further documented to hold the insulin if the resident's blood sugar was less than 100. R76's comprehensive care plan dated 4/5/24 documented, (Name) is at risk for hypo/hyperglycemia and complications of diabetes will be minimized. Administer diabetic meds per MD (medical doctor) order. A review of R76's June medication administration record revealed that on 6/1/24, the insulin was administered although the resident's blood sugar was 94. On 6/12/24 at 10:07 a.m., an interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #1. LPN #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility failed to monitor the neurological status post unwitnessed falls putting the residents at risk for undetected neurological deterioration. This failure affected 2 of 6 residents reviewed for falls (Residents (R) #50 and #68). This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. A review of the medical record revealed, R#50 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a current admission date of 01/26/2022. The diagnoses including but not limited to fractured shaft of right fibula, pain in right ankle and joints of right foot, Parkinson's Disease, unspecified dementia with unspecified severity, history of repeated falls, unspecified cerebral infarction (stroke) and abnormal posture. R#50's Minimum Data Set (MDS), Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score was 4 (The BIMS test presents a scoring scale that guides the interpretation: 0 to 7 points indicates severe cognitive impairment, 8 to 12 points indicates moderate cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident was free from an unnecessary medication for one of 20 residents in the survey sample, Resident #76. The findings include: For Resident #76, (R76), the facility staff failed to hold the resident's insulin on 6/1/24, per a physician's order. A review of R76's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 1/31/24 for Basaglar KwikPen U-100 insulin, 100 units/milliliter- 10 units once daily for diabetes. The order further documented to hold the insulin if the resident's blood sugar was less than 100. A review of R76's June medication administration record revealed that on 6/1/24, the insulin was administered although the resident's blood sugar was 94. On 6/12/24 at 10:07 a.m., an interview was conducted with LPN (licensed practical nurse) #1. LPN #1 stated that if a resident has a physician's order to hold insulin for a blood sugar less than 100 and the resident's blood sugar is 94 then the resident's insulin should be held because that is the physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure that Residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion, for 1 Resident (#122) in a survey sample of 37 Residents. The findings included: For Resident # 122 the facility staff failed to ensure that the Resident's elbow protectors and resting hand splint were applied correctly as ordered by the physician. On 5/23/23 at approximately 11:30 am, an observation was made of Resident #122 in her wheelchair. Resident #112 was asleep, fully dressed, and she had elbow protectors on both elbows and a resting left hand splint applied over the elbow protector. A cork board in her room displayed written directions for the correct application of the splint as well as a photo Resident #122's left arm with the splint correctly applied. The instruction sheet and photo indicated that the elbow protector was to be over the splint not under the splint as it was observed. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate medical record for 1 Resident (#69) in a survey sample of 37 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #69 the facility staff failed to correctly enter an order for morphine. On 5/25/23 during the clinical record review it was noted that on 12/11/22 an order was put in the system for Morphine 20 mg every hour PRN. The order stayed on the MAR (Medication Administration Record) as a valid order until 1/4/23 when a pharmacy review was conducted. At the time of the pharmacy review the pharmacy sent a notice that read: *Clinically Urgent Recommendation Prompt Response Requested [Resident #69 name redacted] medication administration record (MAR) or prescriber order sheets (POS) items that need clarification: Current order on the MAR for PRN Morphine = 20 mg every hour PRN. Pharmacy records indicate Morphine 20 mg / ml give 0.25 ml q hour PRN. Recommendation: Please clarify with MD and adjust the dose on the MAR. The facility corrected the dose on 1/4/23 after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-03-25 · tag F0625 — widespread
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were provided a written notice which specified the duration of the bed-hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for one of 25 sampled residents (Resident (R) 33). On 12/29/21, R33 was transferred to the hospital because she developed paralysis and hematuria; however, she was not given the written notice that addressed holding the resident's bed during her absence. Findings include: Review of R33's Physicians Progress Note, dated 12/29/21, located in the resident's EMR under the progress notes tab, revealed the resident was sent to the hospital per her physician's recommendation due to a change in condition. It was documented that the Physician notified the resident's' daughter. Review of R33's EMR showed a written notice of transfer to the emergency room was sent to the family by the Director of Nursing (DON). During an interview with the DON on 3/24/21 at 4:00 PM the bed hold notification was requested for R33's transfer to the hospital; however, the DON was not able to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-03-25 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and review of the facility menus, it was determined the facility failed to prepare menus to include portion sizes to ensure residents received adequate amounts of menu items to meet their nutritional needs. This failed practice had the potential to affect the nutritional status of the 125 residents in the facility. The facility also failed to ensure menus were not repetitive in food items. Review of the menus revealed chicken in some form was on the menu for lunch and dinner daily four of four residents (Resident (R) 12, R68, R19, and R110) who ccomplained about the lack of variety if food options. Findings include: 1. On 03/22/21 at 10:45 AM, during observation and interview with R12, the resident indicated she was unhappy with the menu. R12 stated they have chicken at every meal. The resident stated she was tired of the baked chicken and chicken entrées like casseroles. 2. On 03/22/21 at 12:10 PM, observation and interview of R68 revealed he was eating a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2021-03-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policies, the facility failed to date foods in the refrigerators according to the facility policy. The facility failed to air dry dishes and pans before being stacked and stored. The facility also failed to date food in resident refrigerators located in the nursing lounge on three of three floors. These failed practices had the potential to affect the 125 residents in the facility. Findings include: 1. Labeling and Dating Review of facility's undated policy titled, Proper Labeling and Dating, all items in refrigerators were to have a date sticker on them. Also, the item must include the open date or prepared date, use by date, time opened or prepared, name of item, and initials of person opening or preparing. This facility had a main kitchen where all food is prepared and then brought to the three floors in large pans. Each floor, except the first floor, has a North, South, East, and [NAME] wing with their own kitchen. The first floor does not have a South wing. There are 11 kitchens on the three floors. On 03/22/21 at 9:00…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-03-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care for one of two sampled residents reviewed for hospice care (Resident (R) 32). This failure has the potential of other residents in hospice care to not receive assistance with ADLs. Findings include: Review of R32's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 01/07/21, located in the resident's electronic medical record (EMR) under the MDS tab, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and legal blindness. Continued review of the MDS revealed R32 was totally dependent on staff for bathing and all personal hygiene. R32's MDS also revealed the facility assessed the resident to have a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of nine out of 15 which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Observation and interview with R32 on 03/22/21 at 11:30 AM, revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-05-25 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to continue skilled services and bill the Resident as requested on the SNF ABN notice (Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice) issued to 1 Resident (Resident #35) in a survey sample of 3 Residents, reviewed for such notices. The findings included: On 5/22/23, the facility Administrator was asked to provide a listing of Residents who were discharged from Medicare Part A services. From this listing a sample was selected which included Resident #35. The notices issued to these Residents were reviewed and revealed the following: 1. For Resident #35, the facility staff provided a SNF ABN notice prior to skilled care services ending. On the ABN form option 2 was selected which read, I want the care listed above, but don't bill Medicare. I understand that I may be billed now because I am responsible for payment of the care. I cannot appeal because Medicare won't be billed. On 5/24/23 at 2:58 PM, an interview was conducted with Employee E, the therapy manager. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-05-25 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to provide bed-hold notice at the time of transfer, for 1 Resident (#130) in a survey sample of 37 Residents. The findings included: For Resident # 130 the facility staff failed to provide the bed hold policy notice at the time of transfer from facility to the ER. Resident #130 was system selected as a closed record for transfer to hospital. On 5/25/23, a review of the clinical record revealed that on 3/21/23, Resident #130 was sent to the emergency room due to low oxygen saturation via rescue squad at 8:40 PM. A review of the clinical record revealed that the Resident had a bed hold policy signed on 3/13/23 (8 days prior to the transfer to the hospital). The clinical record contained the copy of the transfer sheet that went to the hospital with the Resident however no bedhold policy was given at the time of transfer. There was no documentation of verbal or phone conversation about bed hold at the time of transfer. On 5/25/23, during the end of day meeting, the Administrator was made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 10/01/1975
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 12/29/2010
THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 11/30/2006
BURNS, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/07/2015
GARDNER, RUSSELLIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/19/2006
MACKALL, TYLERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 6 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$35.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-95.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$14.2M
Related-party expense21% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 5%Medicare 13%Other / private 82%

This home reported $14.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$1,356per resident / day
operating cost
$41,232per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$695per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Virginia
$10,250/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,680/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,945/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495096. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-06-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next