Friendship Health And Rehab Center - South

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

66.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 579 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 263 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.75 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 93% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.4 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.24 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.31 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.52 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to accurately label medications for 1 of 2 residents, Resident #1. The findings included: For Resident #1 the facility staff failed to ensure the medication Morphine Sulfate was labeled with the correct dosage, resulting in the resident receiving multiple incorrect doses. Resident #1's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, long term use of opiate analgesic, and personal history of traumatic brain injury. Resident #1's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 11/18/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 3 out of 15. This indicates that the resident is severely cognitively impaired. Resident #1's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a plan for . has dx (diagnosis) of MS (multiple sclerosis) with chronic pain . Interventions for this care plan included Administer medications as per orders. See MAR (medication administration record) for details. Resident #1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility policy review the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for the administration of medications for 1 of 2 residents, Resident #1. The finding included: For Resident #1 the facility staff failed compare the medication label to the physician's order, resulting in the resident receiving multiple incorrect doses of the medication morphine sulfate. Resident #1's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, long term use of opiate analgesic, and personal history of traumatic brain injury. Resident #1's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 11/18/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 3 out of 15. This indicates that the resident is severely cognitively impaired. Resident #1's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a plan for . has dx (diagnosis) of MS (multiple sclerosis) with chronic pain . Interventions for this care plan included Administer medications as per orders. See MAR…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review and during a medication pass and pour observation the facility staff failed to ensure medications were available for administration for 4 of 26 residents, #57, #76, #18, and #44. The findings included: 1. For Resident #57 the facility staff failed to ensure the medication Tylenol 500 mg was available for administration. Resident #57's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to rheumatoid arthritis, anxiety disorder, osteoarthritis, and scoliosis. Resident #57's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 02/19/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 14 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Resident #57's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a care plan for . reports frequent pain that she attributes to RA (rheumatoid arthritis) to hands that does not interfere with sleep and occasionally limits day-to-day activities . Interventions for this care plan include…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0554 — isolated
  Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 26 residents was clinically appropriate for self-administration of medications. The findings included: For Resident #56 the facility staff failed to complete a self-administration of medications assessment. Resident #56's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to traumatic subdural hematoma without loss of consciousness, quadriplegia, moderate persistent asthma, and personal history of other diseases of the respiratory system. Resident #56's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 01/21/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Resident #56's comprehensive care plan was reviewed, and surveyor could not locate a care plan for self-administration of medications. Resident #56's physician's order summary was reviewed and contained orders which read in part, Advair HFA…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0636 — isolated
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure an accurate minimum data set (MDS) assessment for 1 of 26 residents, Resident #50. The findings included: For Resident #50 the facility staff failed to code the MDS assessment for use of a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) machine. Resident #50's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to encephalopathy, Parkinson's disease, and obstructive sleep apnea. Resident #50's most recent MDS with an assessment reference date of 03/22/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 11 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is moderately cognitively impaired. Section O, Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs, subsection G3, CPAP, was not coded at being used. Resident #50's comprehensive care plan was reviewed, and surveyor could not locate a care plan for use of CPAP. Resident #50's clinical record was reviewed and contained a physician's order summary for the month of April.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for 2 of 26. residents, #50 and #56. The findings included: 1. For Resident #50 the facility staff failed to develop a care plan for use of a CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) machine. Resident #50's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to encephalopathy, Parkinson's disease, and obstructive sleep apnea. Resident #50's most recent MDS with an assessment reference date of 03/22/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 11 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is moderately cognitively impaired. Section O, Special Treatments, Procedures and Programs, subsection G3, CPAP was not coded at being used. Resident #50's comprehensive care plan was reviewed, and surveyor could not locate a care plan for use of CPAP. Resident #50's clinical record was reviewed and contained a physician's order summary for the month of April.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 26 residents was free from unnecessary medications, Resident #44. The findings included: For Resident #44 the facility staff administered the blood pressure medication, Metoprolol outside of the physician ordered parameters. Resident #44's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to diastolic (congestive) heart failure, and hypertensive heart disease. Resident #44's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 03/22/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 7 out of 15 is section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is severely cognitively impaired. Resident #44's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a care plan for .has a health history of Alzheimer's Dementia with anxiety, AFIB (atrial fibrillation), HTN (hypertension [high blood pressure]), age related debility among other co-morbidities. Interventions for this care plan include provide medications/treatments as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide adequate monitoring for residents receiving psychotropic medications for one of 26 residents in the survey sample, resident # 65. This findings included: For resident # 65 the facility staff failed to implement behavior monitoring or nonpharmacologic interventions for several psychotropic medications prescribed. Resident # 65's diagnoses included but were not limited to, anxiety, depression, history of stroke, diabetes and obstructive sleep apnea. The minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/6/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 indicating intact cognition . Resident # 65 was coded as feeling down or depressed 2-6 days in the lookback period. No behaviors were noted in the lookback period according to the MDS. Review of the clinical record revealed that resident # 65 was prescribed Abilify 2 mg everyday by mouth for a diagnosis of depression(Abilify is classified as an antipsychotic…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview,clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 26 residents was free of significant medication errors, Resident #6. The findings included: For Resident #6 the facility staff failed to administer the medication Levothyroxine per the physcian's order. Resident #6's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to post procedural hypothyroidism. Resident #6's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 02/04/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Resident #6's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained a care plan for .has a health history of type II diabetes mellitus with neuropathic/ophthalmic complication, anemia, . and other co-morbidities. Interventions for this care plan include Provide medications/treatments as ordered. Resident #6's clinical record was reviewed and contained a physician's order summary which read in part,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. For Resident #60, the facility staff failed to document in the clinical record the responsible party's decision to decline the influenza, pneumococcal, and updated 2023-2024 formula COVID-19 vaccines. Resident #60's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, Panic Disorder, and Psychotic Disorder with Delusions. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/17/24 coded the resident as being severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making with short-term and long-term memory problems. According to Resident #60's immunization history documented in the clinical record, the resident had previously received COVID-19 vaccines on 1/25/21, 2/15/21, 6/14/22, 10/20/22 and the most recent influenza vaccine was received on 10/12/22. The resident's immunization documentation did not include a history of any previous pneumococcal vaccines. Surveyor reviewed Resident #60's clinical record and was unable to locate evidence…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure individuals providing resident care correctly performed hand hygiene. The findings include: A contract staff member (SM #20) failed to perform hand hygiene between facility residents when providing toenail care. The following information was found in a facility policy and procedure titled Handwashing (with a revised date of 3/18/23): - It is the policy of this facility that hand washing be regarded as the single most important means of preventing the spread of infections. - The use of gloves does not replace the need for hand hygiene by either alcohol based waterless hand rubs or hand washing with soap and water. - Handwashing to be performed for at least twenty (20) seconds under the following conditions: . Before and after having contact with a resident (i.e., bed bath, changing linen, etc.) . After contact with inanimate objects to include medical equipment in the vicinity of the patient . On 4/25/24 at 1:10 p.m., a contract staff member (SM #20) was observed to finish…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,281 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,281 — penalty dated 2025-06-18

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA