Richfield Health Center - Salem

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 526 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 219 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.58 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 87% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 106.5 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.34 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.41 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.49 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.68 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-12-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to prevent significant medication errors for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident #1). The findings included: The facility staff failed to administer Resident #1's diabetic medication according to the medical provider's orders. This resulted in the need to administer an injectable medication to increase Resident #1's blood sugar on the morning of 5/16/24, with a subsequent transfer to a local emergency department. Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/8/24, was signed as completed on 5/15/24. Resident #1 was assessed as being able to be understood, and as able to understand others. Resident #1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 13 out of 15; this indicated intact or borderline cognition. Resident #1's diagnoses included Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, and Congestive Heart Failure. Resident #1's clinical record included an order, for the dates 5/7/24 - 5/16/24, for Tresiba 30 units…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice related to assessing a resident's change in condition for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident #1). The findings include: The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #1 had assessments, including reassessments, completed and/or documented according to professional standards of practice. Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/8/24, was signed as completed on 5/15/24. Resident #1 was assessed as able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 13 out of 15; this indicated intact or borderline cognition. Resident #1 had a change in condition which resulted in the need to obtain medical provider orders for oxygen via a nasal cannula for oxygen saturation levels less than 90% on 6/12/24 at 7:48 p.m. Resident #1's condition also resulted in the nurse obtaining an order for a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-05 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
  Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to obtain medical provider ordered laboratory tests for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident #1). The findings include: The facility staff failed to obtain Resident #1's medical provider ordered laboratory blood test. Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/8/24, was signed as completed on 5/15/24. Resident #1 was assessed as able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 13 out of 15; this indicated intact or borderline cognition. The following information was found in a facility policy titled Telephone Orders (dated 11/2020): Verbal telephone orders must be documented by the nurse receiving the order. The documentation occurs in two locations in the order entry field and in the resident's medical record under progress notes. Resident #1's clinical documentation included the following information, in a nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-12-05 · tag F0825 — isolated
  Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure prompt implementation of a medical provider order for rehabilitative services for one (1) of five (5) sampled residents (Resident #1). The findings include: The facility staff failed to promptly implement a medical provider order for Resident #1 to be assessed for and/or receive lymphatic drainage massage. Resident #1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/8/24, was signed as completed on 5/15/24. Resident #1 was assessed as able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #1's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 13 out of 15; this indicated intact or borderline cognition. The following information was found in a facility policy titled Telephone Orders (dated 11/2020): Verbal telephone orders must be documented by the nurse receiving the order. The documentation occurs in two locations in the order entry field and in the resident's medical record under progress notes.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, facility staff failed to ensure the resident was treated with dignity related to toileting for 1 of 23 current residents in the survey sample (Resident #89). Resident #89 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included aftercare joint replacement, anemia, hypertension, anticoagulants, abnormal gait, and a history of pulmonary embolism. On the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment, the resident scored 15/15 on the brief interview for mental status and was assessed as without signs of delirium, psychosis, or behavior affecting care. During initial tour on 5/13/2024, Resident #89 complained that she was left on the toilet for 2 1/2 hours on 5/12/24. On 5/14/24, the surveyor received the call Alarm History for the resident's room from 5/12/24 at 12:00 AM through 5/13/24 at 12 AM. The log documented a call from the bed active from 10:21:01 through 12:21:41 (duration 120 minutes). The log documented 7 calls from the bathroom starting at 12:41:27 and ending 14:44:48 (duration in minutes 7.55, 9.33, 2.78,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to notify and consult with the medical provider following a significant weight loss for 1 of 23 current sampled residents, Resident #69. The findings included: For Resident #69, the facility staff failed to notify and consult with the medical provider following a significant weight loss identified on 3/11/24. Resident #69's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, Convulsions, Parkinson's Disease, Lymphedema, Essential Hypertension, and Second-Degree Atrioventricular Block. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/11/24 coded the resident as being severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making with short-term and long-term memory problems. Resident #69 was coded as having had a significant weight loss without a physician-prescribed weight loss regimen. A review of Resident #69's weights revealed a weight of 160.6 on 3/01/24 and a weight of 148.6 on 3/11/24 revealing a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN) notification for 1 of 3 residents selected for SNF Beneficiary Notification Review (BNR), Resident #69. The findings included: For Resident #69, the facility staff failed to provide a SNF ABN notification when the resident was discharged from Medicare Part A services with skilled benefit days remaining while continuing to reside in the facility. Resident #69's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Alzheimer's Disease, Convulsions, Parkinson's Disease, Lymphedema, Essential Hypertension, and Second-Degree Atrioventricular Block. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/11/24 coded the resident as being severely impaired in cognitive skills for daily decision making with short-term and long-term memory problems. Resident #69's clinical record included a social services progress note dated 3/18/24 10:36 AM which…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-15 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to accurately complete a minimum data set (MDS) assessment for 2 of 23 residents, Resident #65 and #102. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to accurately complete a quarterly MDS assessment. The facility staff failed to mark the resident self-catheterization (intermittent catheterization). Resident #65's diagnoses included, obstructive and reflux uropathy, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #65's quarterly MDS assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 04/10/24 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of a possible 15 points. Section H (bladder and bowel) was coded always continent of urine. The box beside of intermittent catheterization was left blank (unchecked). On 05/13/24 during initial tour Resident #65 stated they did their own catheterization and had been doing so for a while. Resident #65's clinical record included a provider order dated 05/25/23 that read Resident to self…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered activity care plan to provide one-to-one activity programming for two (2) of 23 sampled residents (Resident #34 and Resident #26). The findings include: 1. For Resident #34 (R34) the facility staff failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered activity care plan to provide one-to-one activities in her room two times per week. R34's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included, but were not limited to, Dementia, Abnormal Posture, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Aphasia following Cerebral Infarction (stroke), Cognitive Communication Deficit, Depression and Epilepsy. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 02/17/24, coded the resident as having modified independence in cognitive skills for daily decision making with short and long-term memory problems. On 05/14/24 at 10:42 AM, surveyor interviewed R34 about activities and she conveyed activity staff do not do anything in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the residents comprehensive care plan (CCP) for 1 of 23 current residents, Resident #65. The findings included: The facility staff failed to review and revise the residents CCP to include their prophylactic antibiotic and their self-catheterization. Resident #65's diagnoses included, obstructive and reflux uropathy, chronic kidney disease, and diabetes. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #65's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 04/10/24 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of a possible 15 points. Section H (bladder and bowel) was coded to indicate this resident was always continent of urine. The box beside of intermittent catheterization was left blank (unchecked). On 05/13/24 during initial tour Resident #65 stated they did their own catheterization and had been doing so for a while. Resident #65's clinical record included provider orders to self-cath 4 times a day…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to follow physician's orders for the administration of medications for 2 of 23 residents, Resident #93 and Resident #312. The findings included: 1. For Resident #93 the facility staff failed to administer the medications tramadol and gabapentin per the physician's order. Resident #93's face sheet listed diagnoses which included but not limited to pain in left hip and unspecified dementia. Resident #93's most recent minimum data set with an assessment reference date of 02/17/24 coded the resident as having both long- and short-term memory loss with severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. Resident #93's comprehensive care plan was reviewed and contained care plans for . is at risk for altered levels of pain r/t (related to) a dx (diagnosis) of left hip and vertebrae fx (fracture). She has scheduled and prn (as needed) ordered. Resident #93's clinical record was reviewed and contained a physician's order summary which read in part, tramadol HCl Oral Tablet 50 mg…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$15,465 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $15,465 — penalty dated 2024-12-05

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 55 rows in the source record cover these 26 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA