Seaside Hhc @ Atlantic Shore

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

69.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 370 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 164 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.09 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 97% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 50 beds and averages 38.5 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.50 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.96 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.72 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · F2025-11-25 · tag F0577 — widespread
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview and staff interview, the facility staff failed to ensure previous survey results were posted in a place readily available to residents, families and visitors.The findings included:On 11/25/2025 at 1:00 p.m., a group interview was conducted with four alert and oriented residents. All four stated that they were not aware that they could see the results of the previous survey. They stated they did not know where the results were located. A large bulletin board was located in the entry hallway across from the receptionist's desk in the nursing center. There was a notice on the bottom of the bulletin board which stated Survey Results Located: ___________( Assisted Living and Nursing Home names redacted) Reception Desk and ______ (Nursing Home Name redacted) Nurses Station. Please inquire to see a copy of the results. Thank you.There was a silver 3 part letter organizer noted in front of a black binder. There were papers listed as Resident Comment Cards standing in the letter organizer and were obscuring the words on the front of the black…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and a clinical record review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the person-centered care plan for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #3) in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #3 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The resident's diagnoses included pneumonia, heart failure, and dementia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/3/25, coded the resident as having completed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 7 out of a possible 15. This indicated that Resident #3's cognitive abilities for daily decision-making were severely impaired. A review of Resident #3's person-centered care plan revealed a problem dated 10/27/25, which stated the resident had congestive heart failure. The goal stated that the resident would be free of peripheral edema through the review date, 2/3/26. The interventions included: monitor/document and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and a clinical record review, the facility staff failed to implement customary routines, interests, preferences, and choices for 1 of 21 residents (Resident #3) who exhibited episodes of inappropriate behaviors during activities of daily living (ADL) in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #3 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The resident's diagnoses included dementia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 11/3/25, coded the resident as having completed the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 7 out of a possible 15. This indicated that Resident #3's cognitive abilities for daily decision-making were severely impaired.In section F0400. Interview for Daily Preferences: the resident was coded as stating that it was very important to choose his own bedtime, to have his family or a close friend involved in discussions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, to include the expiration date.Findings include:The facility staff failed to ensure medications and COVID-19 test kits were within expiration date for eleven (11) COVID-19 kits in the medication room and three (3) bottles of Lorazepam liquid (an anti-anxiety medication used to treat symptoms of anxiety) with open date on the box or bottle in the medication refrigerator.On 11/24/25, an Inspection of the Medication Room was completed which revealed ten (10) COVID-19 test kits ([NAME] brand) with expiration date 4/2025 and one (1) kit (iHealth brand) with expiration date 4/25/25 in the cabinets.On 11/24/25, an inspection of the Medication Room refrigerator was completed which revealed three (3) bottles of Lorazepam liquid: 1 bottle dispensed 7/2/25 - open, not dated upon opening 1 bottle dispensed 5/23/25 - open,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, record reviews, and facility document reviews, the facility staff failed to maintain an effective infection control program that included a comprehensive surveillance system and effective infection control practices to prevent communicable diseases or infections in the one (1) nursing unit.Findings included: 1. The facility lab tech failed to remove personal protective equipment appropriately upon exiting the resident room, and facility staff failed to follow the facility's policy for the surveillance and monitoring of infection control practices and monitoring of infectious disease trends. On 11/24/25, a female was observed exiting a resident's room wearing a white disposable gown. She was observed walking to the nurse's station, looking at documents on the nurse's desk, and then walking back down the hall while wearing the white disposable gown. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing, who was coming down the hall, regarding her expectations for staff when donning/doffing personal protective equipment (PPE). She responded,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interviews, record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to establish an effective infection prevention and control program (IPCP) that included an antibiotic stewardship program with antibiotic use protocols and a system to monitor antibiotic use for facility residents.Findings include: The facility staff failed to consistently monitor the assessment of antibiotic use.On 11/24/25 at approximately 1:45 PM, an interview was conducted with RN-2 on the facility's antibiotic stewardship program, and she replied, I am not sure as I don't know what that is, (name of the Infection Control Nurse) handles all of that.On 11/24/25 at approximately 2:10 PM, an interview was conducted with LPN-1 on did the facility have an antibiotic stewardship program and she replied Well, I don't know. I don't know what that is?On 11/24/25 at approximately 2:20 PM, an interview was conducted with the Infection Preventionist (ADM-3) on the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP). According to her the facility had identified gaps in the facility's IPCP…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-01-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the kitchen were labeled, dated when opened, sealed closed, and outdated food disposed. Also, employees failed to wash their hands when entering the kitchen and wear a hair covering. These failures had the potential to affect all 38 residents in the facility who ate food from the kitchen. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Labels, dated October 1997, documented . All prepared and leftover food intended for storage will be covered, labeled, and dated according to posted FDA guidelines and department standard. The day food item is opened or prepared is considered day one. Item is to be placed in proper refrigerator, freezer, or dry storage. 1. On 01/03/22 at 10:00 AM, the following observations were made with and verified by the Food and Beverage Director (FBD). The dry storage room contained one bag of brown rice with a use-by-date of 11/13/21, one bag of white rice with a use-by-date of 10/20/21, one bag of potato chips with a use-by-date of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-01-06 · tag F0582 — isolated
  Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide Form CMS-10055 (Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services) Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNFABN) to two of three residents (Residents (R) 16 and R22) reviewed for liability notices out of a total sample of 17 residents. The form should have included the type of service provided and the estimated cost to continue receiving the services. The failure to provide the SNFABN prevented the responsible party the ability to make an informed decision related to the cost of continued therapy services. Findings include: On 01/04/22 the facility provided the directions to complete the ABN printed from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) website. The directions stated, . Medicare inpatient hospitals and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) use other approved notices for Part A items and services when notice is required to shift potential financial liability to the beneficiary . 1. Review of the electronic medical record (EMR) Profile tab revealed R16 was admitted to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-01-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address functional limited range of motion (ROM) for one (Resident (R) 15) reviewed for mobility/positioning in a total sample of 17 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered with a revision date of December 2016 directed A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables resident's physical, to meet the psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident .The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. Review of R15's Profile located…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2022-01-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interview statements and policy review, the facility failed to ensure that two (Resident (R) 85 and R8) of three residents reviewed for pressure sores received necessary treatment and services to promote healing. R85 had a delay in treating and completing an assessment of a known pressure ulcer upon admission and R8 did not receive a physician ordered treatment for an existing pressure ulcer. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled, Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management dated June 2021 directed that, Each resident's skin condition is assessed upon admission. The assessment is documented in the clinical record .The resident representative is notified of any new wound or worsening wound and this is documented in the clinical record .Every effort is to be made to complete the skin evaluation within two (2) hours of admission .Pressure ulcers are assessed to location, type, stage, size, shape, depth, size and depth of sinus track, surrounding tissue, and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

What families pay in VA