Summit Square

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 80 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 2.04 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 100% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 18 beds and averages 14.6 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 7.44 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.63 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.17 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 6.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 8.02 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 2.04 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 47% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2025-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident and staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide an environment free of avoidable accident hazards and failed to monitor coffee temperatures to prevent burns, resulting in harm for two residents (Resident #4- R4 and Resident #2-R2) in a survey sample of five residents. These findings led to the identification of Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) and the identification of Substandard Quality of Care. The findings included: On 2/5/25, during a review of facility documentation, it was noted that on 6/13/24, Resident #4 (R4) was served coffee which resulted in a burn to her lip and roof of her mouth, requiring hospitalization. On 2/5/25, a closed record review was conducted of R4's chart. This review revealed that a Hot Liquid Risk Assessment had been completed on five occasions in 2023 and four times in 2024. The most recent assessment prior to the burn incident on 6/13/24, was completed on 5/23/24, and noted that R4 had tremors in upper extremities that create risk for spillage and weakness in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-02-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, resident interview, staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide beverages at a safe temperature to prevent injury, which resulted in harm for two residents (Resident #4 - R4 and Resident #2 - R2) in a survey sample of five residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #4 (R4), the facility staff served coffee at a temperature that resulted in significant burns and scalding, which developed into a life-threatening injury that required hospitalization and the surgical placement of a feeding tube. On 2/5/25, during a review of facility documentation, it was noted that on 6/13/24, Resident #4 (R4) was served coffee which resulted in a burn to her lip and roof of her mouth, causing hospitalization. On 2/5/25 a closed record review was conducted of R4's chart. This review revealed a Hot Liquid Risk Assessment completed on 5/23/24, which noted R4 had tremors in upper extremities that create risk for spillage and weakness in upper extremities that create a risk for spillage. The recommendations…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-02-07 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — isolated
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record reviews, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to implement and maintain an effective quality assurance and performance improvement (QAPI) program, and failed to provide evidence necessary to demonstrate compliance with these requirements, which resulted in harm for two residents (Resident #2 and Resident #4) in a survey sample of five residents. The findings included: On 2/5/25 at 11:40 a.m., an observation was conducted of the on-unit kitchenette where the coffee is prepared. The cook (other employee #1- OE #1) was observed taking the temperature of food items, which included the soup at 174 degrees farenheight and hotdog chili that was 175 degrees farenheight. The cook did not obtain any temperatures of the beverages being served. The coffee maker was noted to have a digital display that read, Ready to Brew. Water temp: 200 degrees. The dietary staff were observed to pour and serve coffee directly from the coffee pot in which it was brewed. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to store, prepare, and serve food in a sanitary manner in the main kitchen and on the on-unit kitchen on the one nursing unit having the potential to affect many residents on the one healthcare unit. The findings included:12/1/25 at 6:02 pm, an observation was conducted of the galley kitchen, located on the healthcare unit. Upon entering the galley kitchen, it was observed that on the beverage table there were 3 partial loaves of bread, open without any date as to when it was opened or to be used by. In the reach-in freezer there was a large container of ice cream that was open to air and had no indication of when it had been opened or was to be used by. There was a smaller metal container with multiple cream-colored cubes in it, wrapped in saran wrap and had no label to indicate the contents, date prepared, or date to be used. The server/cook (Other employee #1- OE #1) stated that it was butter. OE #1 said everything needs to be labeled to make sure everything is safe and in date for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop a comprehensive care plan for one of fourteen residents in the survey sample (Resident #2).The findings include:Resident #2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included diabetes, congestive heart failure, insomnia, neuropathy, osteoarthritis, asthma, anemia and chronic kidney disease. The minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] assessed Resident #2 as cognitively intact.On 12/2/25 at 4:38 p.m., Resident #2 was interviewed about any sleeping problems. Resident #2 stated sound sleep at times was an issue. Resident #2 stated interventions provided to assist with sleep included leg elevation in the evening, cool wraps to legs and the medication Trazadone. Resident #2 stated these interventions had been helpful with improving sleep problems.Resident #2's clinical record included a physician's order dated 11/21/25 for the medication Trazadone 125 milligrams (mg) with instructions to administer at each…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review, the facility failed to label a medication according to the physician's order for one of five residents in the medication pass observation (Resident #19).The findings include:A medication pass observation was conducted on 12/1/25 at 7:15 p.m. with licensed practical nurse (LPN #1) administering medications to Resident #19. Included in medications administered was escitalopram 15 milligrams (mg). The 15 mg escitalopram dose included two tablets. One tablet was from a pharmacy supply card labeled escitalopram 10 mg with instructions to give one tablet at bedtime for anxiety. The second tablet was from a pharmacy card labeled escitalopram 5 mg with instructions to give one tablet at bedtime for anxiety. Review of Resident #19's clinical record revealed a physician's order dated 11/24/25 for escitalopram 10 mg with instructions to give 1.5 tablets at each bedtime for anxiety.On 12/2/25 at 10:43 a.m., LPN #2 caring for Resident #19, was interviewed about the discrepancy between the escitalopram…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate clinical record for one resident (Resident #1-R1) in a survey sample of fourteen residents. The findings included:For R1, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete clinical record to include hospital discharge records and visits with an outside provider, the urologist. On 12/2/25, review of the facility submitted Resident Matrix R1 was noted to be on an antibiotic. R1 was then selected for review of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. On 12/2/25 at 9:40 am, during an interview with the facility's infection preventionist, who was registered nurse #1 (RN#1) and the director of nursing (DON), R1 and his antibiotic use was discussed. Both RN #1 and the DON reported that R1 had been hospitalized and diagnosed with an urinary tract infection and was admitted to the facility's healthcare unit following discharge from the hospital. They went on to report…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to perform hand hygiene between residents during a medication pass observation on one of one unit.The findings include:On 12/1/25 starting at 7:00 p.m., a medication pass observation was conducted with licensed practical nurse (LPN #1) administering medications to three residents. On 12/1/25 at 7:00 p.m., without prior hand hygiene, LPN #1 prepared and administered oral medications to Resident #9. LPN #1 touched and disposed of Resident #9's medication cup prior to exiting the room. Without performing hand hygiene, LPN #1 then prepared and administered oral medications to Resident #4. While administering medications to Resident #4, LPN #1 handled the resident's personal thermal mug in addition to the used medication cup. Without performing hand hygiene, LPN #1 then prepared and administered oral medications to Resident #19. On 12/1/25 at 7:21 p.m., LPN #1 was interviewed about the lack of hand hygiene between contact with multiple residents during the medication pass. LPN #1 stated, I…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-07 · tag F0944 — widespread
  Conduct mandatory training, for all staff, on the facility’s Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and employee record reviews, the facility staff failed to provide QAPI (Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement) training to 9 of 9 sampled employees reviewed for educational requirements. The findings included: On 2/6/25, a sample of nine employees was selected from a listing of current staff. The sample included management staff, CNAs (certified nursing assistants), LPNs (Licensed practical nurses) and RNs (registered nurses). The facility administrator was given the names of the nine sampled staff and was asked to provide all education and in-service training for those employees to include evidence of QAPI training. On 2/7/25, the facility provided a transcript for an electronic training system for the sampled employees. These documents were reviewed and revealed that none of the 9 sampled employees had received any training with regards to the elements and goals of the facility's QAPI program. During a meeting held at approximately 10:35 a.m., on 2/7/25, the facility Administrator, Director of Nursing, and corporate staff were made aware that there…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0577 — pattern
  Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to post the results of the most recent survey results in a place readily accessible to residents and families having the potential to affect multiple residents on one of one unit. The findings included: On 3/31/25 at 4:45 p.m., observations were conducted on the one healthcare unit. Upon entry to the unit there was a wall pocket that held a three-ring binder. The cover of the binder read, [facility name redacted] 2022-2023 Virginia State Survey Results. Within the binder were survey results, the most recent survey report was dated 11/15/2023. On 4/1/25 at 8:56 a.m., observations were conducted of the survey results binder. There were no results from the survey conducted February 7, 2025, in the binder. On 4/1/25 at 10:36 a.m., an interview was conducted with the facility administrator. When asked about the survey results, the administrator said, [executive director's name redacted] spoke about survey results at his last meeting with all the residents and those minutes were sent to all the resident's family member.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
  Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation reviews, the facility staff failed to effectively administer in the facility in a manner to prevent accident hazards, which resulted in the identification of immediate jeopardy and substandard quality of care during the survey, that had been identified during a prior survey and not corrected, having the potential to result in more than minimal harm for many residents residing on one of one units. The findings included: The facility administrator, who was responsible for monitoring and ensuring ongoing compliance to provide an environment free of accident hazards, failed to effectively administer the facility in a manner to ensure residents were not at risk for injury from hot liquids. During the survey conducted 2/5/25-2/7/25, the facility was determined to be in immediate jeopardy due to the lack of monitoring of the temperature of hot liquids, which resulted in harm when two residents suffered injury from spilled coffee.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident interviews, and staff interviews, the facility staff failed to serve meals in the dining room in a manner to promote dignity affecting three residents (Resident #106, Resident #107 and Resident #108) out of a survey sample of eight residents. The findings included: The facility staff failed to serve the residents sitting at the same table at the same time. On 3/31/25 at 12:00 p.m., an observation was made in the main dining room at lunchtime of the residents being served their meals. Resident #105 was observed at 12:03 p.m., at the table with two other residents, and she received her lunch meal, ate and was leaving the table before Resident #106, and Resident #107 was served their meals. Resident #108 was observed at the table waiting for the other residents to be served before she began eating her meal. On 3/31/25 at 12:10 p.m., Resident #106 was interviewed. Resident#106 said, [Resident#107's name redacted], maybe we will get some more help. Resident #106 said, I am hungry, but patience is a virtue. Registered nurse RN#2 came by the table and said,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0732 — isolated
  Post nurse staffing information every day.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interviews and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to post daily staffing information on 1 of 1 unit. The findings included: The facility staff failed to post the daily staffing information for residents and visitors to be able to view. On 2/7/25 at 9:27 a.m. during a walkthrough of the nursing facility the surveyor observed that the daily staffing posting was dated 2/6/25. On 2/7/25 at 9:30 a.m. an interview was conducted with the unit manager, who was a registered nurse (RN #1). When asked about the purpose of the daily staffing posting, RN#1 stated, Because it is regulation and so families know who we have in here. The unit manager identified a staff member as being responsible for it and reported that she posts it daily when she arrives at 7:30 a.m. During the above interview, the facility administrator walked in, was notified of the concern, and was invited to also confirm the finding. On 2/7/25 at approximately 9:35 a.m., the surveyor was accompanied by the unit manager and facility administrator back to the lobby where it was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$50,021 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $50,021 — penalty dated 2025-02-07

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $429K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA