Holston Health & Rehabilitation
990 Holston Rd, Wytheville, VA 24382 · For profit - Corporation · 137 certified beds · (276) 228-5595 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (68) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $111,911 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-07)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (78%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 3 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 25.7% | 14.9% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.1% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.6% | 0.4% | 0.9% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.2% | 18.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 3.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 27.7% | 15.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 33.2% | 20.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 94.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.9% | 4.7% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.0% | 21.8% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 10.0% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.3% | 73.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 19.2% | 22.3% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.9% | 11.5% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.24 | 1.52 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 3.16 | 1.48 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 75 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 41.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 48.5%CMS range 37.7–57.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 6.8–14.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 41.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 39.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 31.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 3.9–11.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.05 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 137 beds and averages 93.0 residents a day — about 68% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.52 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.66 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.30 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.42 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 78% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
68 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 56 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 7. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #90's insulin was ordered and/or administered to address the resident's diabetic needs. Resident #90's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/26/25, was signed as completed on 1/29/25. Resident #90 was assessed as usually able to make self understood and as usually able to understand others. Resident #90's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 15 out of 15; this indicated intact or borderline cognition. Resident #90's clinical documentation indicated the resident arrived at the facility on 1/22/25 at 4:10 p.m. A DIET REQUISITION FORM for the resident to receive a no salt added, CCHO diet was used to communicate the resident's dietary needs to the dietary department on 1/22/25. (A CCHO diet is a consistent or controlled carbohydrate diet ordered to help control blood sugar levels.) Resident #90's hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE] at 12:19 p.m., indicated the resident was to continue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure that pain management is provided to residents consistent with professional standards of practice and the person-centered comprehensive care plan for 1 (one) of 30 residents in the survey sample, resident #448 (R448). The findings included: R448's diagnoses included but were not limited to, right hip fracture post-surgical repair, Alzheimer's Disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis, pain unspecified and restless leg syndrome. The minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 1/24/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 1 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment. Under Section D- Mood, R448 was coded as feeling down, depressed or hopeless 7-11 days in the last two weeks, having little pleasure in doing things 7-11 days in the last two weeks, trouble falling or staying asleep 7-11 days in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility document review facility staff failed to implement a process that ensured all residents were provided written information concerning the right to formulate an advance directive for 11 of 30 sampled residents. (Resident #4, #39, #45, #62, #63, #65, #67, #77, #89, #198, #348). The findings were: The facility staff failed to ensure Residents #4, #39, #45, #62, #63, #65, #67, #77, #89, #198, and #348 were provided with written information on the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment. The aforementioned residents' clinical records contained a document titled, ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT OF admission INFORMATION which residents or responsible parties signed upon admission. The document read in part, I acknowledge that I have received the following information at the time of my admission. I have had the following information orally explained to me by a representative of the facility. One of the over 20 items listed was titled, Advance Directive Handbook. On 04/30/25 at 9:35 a.m. when asked about the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-07 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to implement a process that ensured a baseline care plan was developed for every resident within 48 hours of admission and failed to provide the resident and their representative with a summary of that baseline care plan for 7 of 30 residents. (Resident #1, #32, #39, #65, #77, #89, and #348). The findings were: The facility staff failed to ensure a process was in place to provide residents and their representatives with a summary of the baseline care plan that was initiated within 48 hours of the resident's admission. The clinical record reviews failed to contain evidence Resident #1, #32, #39, #65, #77, #89, and #348 and their representatives were provided a baseline care plan. On 05/01/25 at 10:15 a.m., a surveyor spoke with the MDS (minimum data set) coordinator who stated MDS staff completed the baseline care plans in the computer following a resident's admission, but the coordinator had not been printing it out, providing a copy to the resident or reviewing it with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
3. The facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice related to documenting the pronouncement of death for Resident #95. Resident #95's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/6/25, was signed as completed on 3/10/25. Resident #95 was assessed as usually able to make self understood and as usually able to understand others. Resident #95's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 9 out of 15; this indicated moderate cognitive impairment. On the morning of 5/2/25, the following information was found in Resident #95's clinical record, as part of a licensed practical nurse's progress note dated 4/10/25 at 4:01 a.m.: Resident presents with no signs of life, no blood pressure, no pulse, no respirations. Resident is a DNR. Post mortem care provided by CNAs. DON notified and pronounced resident at 0351. (Resident #95 was not a hospice patient.) Documentation of a registered nurse's assessment for the pronouncement of death was not found. The following registered nurse progress note was documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure sufficient licensed nursing staff to provide services to assure residents attain or maintain the highest practicable physical wellbeing of each resident. The findings included: The facility failed to ensure the Director of Nursing (DON) and/or Licensed Nurse Unit Managers (UMs) had the required time to monitor and/or maintain the facility lab process. According to the current Facility assessment dated [DATE], the average daily census for this 107 certified bed facility was 98. According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) Staffing Data Reports, the facility had a one-star staffing rating for the previous four (4) quarters. During the survey, the survey team identified concerns for four (4) residents regarding the staff's failure to (1) ensure timely laboratory test completion, (2) communicate abnormal test results to the medical provider, (3) ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure the Director of Nursing (DON) did not serve as a charge nurse. The findings included: For this 107 certified bed facility, the DON served as a charge nurse and/or certified nursing assistant (CNA) providing direct resident care on 14 occasions between 1/01/25 through 4/30/25. According to the current Facility assessment dated [DATE], the average daily resident census was 98. On 5/02/25 at 1:06 PM, surveyor spoke with the DON regarding staffing and the DON stated she did work the medication cart at times. When asked if she felt the concerns identified during the survey were related to staffing, the DON stated if she or the Unit Managers were on a cart it was hard to keep up with the facility processes. Surveyor requested and received the dates of when the DON served as a nurse or CNA since 1/01/25. According to the provided report, the DON worked as a floor nurse nine days and as a CNA five days from 1/01/25 through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, family interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain complete and/or accurate clinical records for two (2) of 30 sampled residents (Resident #39 and Resident #63). The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to document the details of episodes of behaviors documented on Resident #63's medication administration record (MAR). Resident #63's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/4/25, was signed as completed on 3/5/25. Resident #63 was assessed as usually able to make self understood and as usually able to understand others. Resident #63's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 13 out of 15; this indicated intact or borderline cognition. Resident #63's MAR for April 2025 had the resident documented as having two (2) episodes of behaviors on the following two (2) 7p.m. to 7a.m. shifts: (1) 4/10/25 and (2) 4/29/25. Resident #63's clinical documentation failed to include what the behaviors were. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-07 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — patternProvide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide behavioral health training for 5 of 5 sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5. The findings included: For CNAs #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5, the facility staff failed to provide evidence of behavioral health training. On 5/06/25, surveyor reviewed CNA #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5's in-service training records. The records failed to include evidence of behavioral health training. CNAs #1, #2, #3, and #5 had only completed the trauma-informed care portion of behavioral health training. Surveyor reviewed the Facility assessment dated [DATE] which read in part .Services and Care We Offer Based on Residents' Needs .Mental Health and Behavior. Manage the medical conditions and medication-related issues causing psychiatric symptoms and behavior, identify and implement interventions to help support individuals with issues such as dealing with anxiety, care of someone with cognitive impairment, care of individuals…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 of 19 residents was assessed for self-administration of medications, Resident #119. The findings included:The facility staff failed to assess Resident #119 for self-administration of medications. Resident #119 had an Albuterol inhaler in their room. Resident #119's diagnoses included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, and heart failure. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #119's admission minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 07/19/25 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 15 out of a possible 15 points. Indicating Resident #119 was cognitively intact. Resident #119's comprehensive care plan included the focus area has chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory failure, and congestive heart failure. Interventions included give aerosol or bronchodilators as ordered. Resident #119's clinical record included a progress note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to notify the medical provider of a change in condition for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident #65). The findings included: For Resident #65 the facility staff failed to notify the medical provider of a change in condition that resulted in the resident being transferred to a higher level of care on 2/4/25. Resident #65's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to, Heart Failure, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery, Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Atrial Fibrillation, Myocardial Infarction, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Cardiomyopathy, Presence of Prosthetic Heart Valve, Presence of Cardiac Pacemaker, Transient Ischemic Attack, and Anxiety Disorder. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/14/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 8 out of 15 for cognitive abilities,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide a Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN) notification for one (1) of three (3) residents selected for SNF Beneficiary Notification Review (Resident #100). The findings include: In the morning of 05/01/25, the administrator provided the requested list of Medicare beneficiaries who were discharged from a Medicare covered Part A stay with benefit days remaining in the past 6 months prior to the survey. Three (3) residents were selected for SNF Beneficiary Notification Review from the list. For Resident #100, the provided document read the resident was not provided the SNF ABN with the reason marked other and a hand-written explanation that read, I can't remember, I can't find in file. On 05/01/25 at 1:41 p.m., the surveyor spoke with the administrator who reported facility staff were unable to find any beneficiary documentation for Resident #100. During an end of day summary meeting on 05/01/25 at 4:37 p.m. with the administrator, administrator-in-training,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 56 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
3. The facility staff failed to notify the ombudsman of Resident #90's transfer/discharge to a local hospital. Resident #90's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/26/25, was signed as completed on 1/29/25. Resident #90 was assessed as usually able to make self understood and as usually able to understand others. Resident #90's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 15 out of 15; this indicated intact or borderline cognition. Resident #90's clinical documentation indicated the resident was admitted to a local hospital on 1/26/25. No evidence was found by or provided to the surveyor to indicate the ombudsman had been notified of this discharge/transfer. The following information was found in a facility policy titled Transfer or Discharge, Preparing a Resident for (with a revised date of December 2016): The business office is responsible for: a. Informing appropriate departments of the resident's transfer or discharge; b. Informing the resident, or his or her representative (sponsor) of our facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation to the resident to ensure a safe and orderly transfer/discharge from the facility for (1) of (30) sampled residents, (Resident #65). The findings included: For Resident #65 the facility staff failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation was provided to the resident in the clinical record to ensure a safe and orderly transfer/discharge to a higher level of care on 2/4/25. Resident #65's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to, Heart Failure, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery, Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Atrial Fibrillation, Myocardial Infarction, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Cardiomyopathy, Presence of Prosthetic Heart Valve, Presence of Cardiac Pacemaker, Transient Ischemic Attack, and Anxiety Disorder. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/14/25 assigned the resident a brief…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide residents and/or resident's representative with a facility bed hold policy upon transfer for one (1) of thirty (30) sampled residents, (Resident #65) The findings include: For Resident #65, the facility staff failed to provide the resident and/or the resident's representative with the facility bed-hold policy upon transfer/discharge to a higher level of care on 2/4/25. Resident #65's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to, Heart Failure, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease of Native Coronary Artery, Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Atrial Fibrillation, Myocardial Infarction, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Cardiomyopathy, Presence of Prosthetic Heart Valve, Presence of Cardiac Pacemaker, Transient Ischemic Attack, and Anxiety Disorder. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/14/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure accurate minimum data set (MDS) assessments for one (1) of 30 sampled residents (Resident #59). The findings include: The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #59's minimum data set (MDS) assessments correctly captured the resident's lower extremity functional range of motion. Resident #59's MDS assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 2/19/25, was signed as completed on 2/20/25. Resident #59 was assessed as able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #59's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 00 out of 15; this indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #59's MDS assessment, with an ARD of 2/19/25, had the resident's functional limitation in range of motion assessed as both lower extremities having impairment. Resident #59's MDS assessment, with an ARD of 11/19/24, had the resident's functional limitation in range of motion assessed as both lower extremities having impairment. These two…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to develop and implement a care plan for 2 of 30 residents, Resident #51 and Resident #77. The findings included: 1. For Resident #51 the facility staff failed to develop and implement a care plan for oxygen usage. Resident #51's clinical record listed diagnoses which included but not limited to chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, morbid obesity, and obstructive sleep apnea. Resident #51's most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of [DATE] assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Section O, special treatments, procedures, and programs coded the resident as using oxygen while a resident. Resident #51's comprehensive care plan was reviewed, and surveyor could not locate a care plan related to oxygen usage. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for 2 of 30 residents, Resident #51, Resident #85. The findings included: 1. For Resident #51 the facility staff failed to review and revise the care plan for oxygen usage. Resident #51's clinical record listed diagnoses which included but not limited to chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, morbid obesity, and obstructive sleep apnea. Resident #51's most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 02/28/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Section O, special treatments, procedures, and programs coded the resident as using oxygen while a resident. It did not code the resident as using CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure). Resident #51's comprehensive care plan was reviewed, and contained a care plan for The resident is resistive to care r/t…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to document tube feeding residuals for one (1) of 30 sampled residents (Resident #67). The findings include: The facility staff failed to document the amount when checking Resident #67's tube feeding residuals. Resident #67's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 3/13/25, was signed as completed on 3/14/25. Resident #67 was assessed as usually able to make self understood and as usually able to understand others. Resident #67's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 10 out of 15; this indicated moderate cognitive impairment. Resident #67's clinical record included an order dated 8/13/24 at 1:17 p.m. for Enteral: Check gastric residual volume prior to feeding. Hold if >150 and notify MD. The Order Summary for this order included the following instructions: three times a day check gastric residuals: if greater than 150 hold and notify MD. (Enteral feeding is when an individual who is unable to eat or drink…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, resident interview, clinical record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to provide respiratory services per the physician's orders for 1 of 30 residents, Resident #51. The findings included: For Resident #51 the facility staff failed to provide oxygen per the physician's order. Resident #51's clinical record listed diagnoses which included but not limited to chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, morbid obesity, and obstructive sleep apnea. Resident #51's most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 02/28/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 15 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This indicates that the resident is cognitively intact. Section O, special treatments, procedures, and programs coded the resident as using oxygen while a resident. Resident #51's clinical record was reviewed and contained a physician's order summary which read in part, 02 via NC (nasal cannula) at 2L/min (liters per minute) via NC every day shift for 02 dropping and unable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide appropriate care and services to address trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice for (1) one of (30) thirty sampled residents, (Resident #77) The findings included: For Resident #77, the facility staff failed to properly assess the residents' experiences and preferences in order to identify and/or eliminate and/or mitigate potential triggers that have the potential to cause re-traumatization in relation to a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Resident #77's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to, Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis, Cerebral Infarction, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertensive Heart Disease, Depressive Episodes, Anxiety Disorder, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Suicidal Ideations, and Mood Affective Disorder. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0711 — isolatedEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure medical provider orders were signed by the ordering provider when the orders were entered into residents' clinical records by non-prescribing facility staff members for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident #90). The findings include: A medical provider failed to sign orders entered by non-prescribing facility staff members on behalf of the prescriber. Resident #90's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/26/25, was signed as completed on 1/29/25. Resident #90 was assessed as usually able to make self understood and as usually able to understand others. Resident #90's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 15 out of 15; this indicated intact or borderline cognition. Resident #90's following orders, which were entered by non-prescribing staff members, were not signed by a medical provider: - An order for pantoprazole 40mg by mouth once a day was ordered on 1/22/25 at 2:39 p.m. - An order for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, facility document review, and during a medication pass and pour observation, the facility staff failed to maintain an accurate record of controlled drugs for (2) two of (30) sampled residents, (Resident #201 and Resident #51). The findings included: Surveyor observed a medication pass and pour with licensed practical nurse (LPN#1) on 4/30/25. On 4/30/25 at 9:21 AM, surveyor observed LPN#1 prepare medications for Resident #201, that included one (1) tablet of Oxycodone 5/325 mg (milligrams). LPN#1 did not sign the medication out in the narcotics book at the time of preparation. The nurse administered the Oxycodone at 9:34 AM to Resident #201. LPN#1 did not sign the medication out in the narcotics book after returning to the medication cart. Surveyor observed a medication pass and pour with LPN#2 on 4/30/25. On 4/30/25 at 9:48 AM, surveyor observed LPN#2 prepare medications for Resident #51, that included (1) one tablet of Gabapentin 100 mg. LPN#2 did not sign the medication out in the narcotics book at the time of preparation. The nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure the medical provider reviewed medication regimen reviews in a timely manner for (1) one of (30) sampled residents, (Resident #36). The findings included: For Resident #36 the facility staff failed to provide evidence of the 8/26/24 medication regimen review (MRR) being reported to and acted upon by the medical provider in a timely manner. Resident #36's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses that included but were not limited to Hypertension, Seborrheic Dermatitis, Alzheimer's Disease with Early Onset, Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia, Cerebrovascular Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Epilepsy, Depression, Anxiety, Dementia, Chronic Kidney Disease-Stage 2, and Schizoaffective Disorder. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/6/25, assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 5 out of 15 for cognitive abilities, indicating the resident was severely impaired in cognition. Progress notes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for 3 of 30 sampled residents (Resident #26, Resident #62, and Resident #4). The findings included: 1. For Resident #26, the facility staff failed to correctly transcribe and administer an intravenous (IV) antibiotic as ordered by the medical provider to treat a urinary tract infection. Resident #26's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Acute Cerebrovascular Insufficiency and History of Urinary Tract Infections. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/26/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 6 out of 15 indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. Resident #26's comprehensive person-centered care plan included a focus area stating the resident had a history of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Resident #26 was readmitted to the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure the safe and secure storage of medications and biologicals for (1) one of (5) five facility medication carts. The findings included: On 4/30/25 at 11:39AM, surveyor observed an unattended, unlocked medication cart on the nursing unit. Licensed practical nurse #1 (LPN#1) approached the medication cart and surveyor asked her if this was her medication cart and she stated, Yes. Surveyor informed LPN#1 the cart was observed unlocked and the nurse then locked the medication cart. This concern was discussed at the end of day meeting on 4/30/25 at 4:57 PM with the administrator, director of nursing, and administrator in training. Surveyor requested and received a facility policy titled, Security of Medication Cart, that read in part, .4. Medication carts must be securely locked at all times when out of the nurse's view . No other information was provided to the survey team prior to exit on 5/7/25.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of 2 of 30 sampled residents, Resident #348 and #77. The findings included: 1. For Resident #348, the facility staff failed to obtain a urinalysis as ordered on 4/25/25. Resident #348's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Streptococcal Sepsis, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5, and Hypertensive Heart Disease. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/26/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #348's comprehensive person-centered care plan included a focus area stating, The resident has renal insufficiency r/t [related to] Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 5, history of Kidney Stones and UTIs [urinary tract infections] with an intervention stating, Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0773 — isolatedProvide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, record review and facility document review the facility staff failed to promptly notify the ordering provider of laboratory results that fell outside clinical reference ranges, in accordance with facility policies and procedures for notification of a practitioner or per the ordering physician's orders for 1 (one) of 30 residents in the survey sample, resident # 15 (R15). The findings included: For R15 the facility failed repeatedly to notify the provider of urinalysis with culture and sensitivity results that indicated the resident had a urinary tract infection (UTI) which delayed treatment for the UTI. R15's diagnoses included but were not limited to, chronic renal failure stage IV (severe), benign prostatic hypertension, and obstructive and reflux uropathy. The minimum data set (MDS) assessment for R15 with an assessment reference date of 2/20/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 7 out of 15, indicating moderate cognitive impairment. During a review of the clinical record, a progress note dated 2/24/25 at 3:19 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to obtain timely diagnostic services to meet the needs of the residents for 1 of 30 sampled residents (Resident #4). The findings included: For Resident #4, the facility staff failed to follow the medical provider order to obtain a chest x-ray (CXR) in a timely manner. Resident #4's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Multiple Myeloma, and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/19/25 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 15 out of 15 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #4 was seen by the nurse practitioner (NP) on 4/09/25, the progress note read in part .presenting with a mild fever and chills .A chest x-ray will be ordered to rule out any respiratory infections that could be causing the fever . An order for a CXR to rule out pneumonia was entered into Resident #4's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain infection prevention and control practices during medication administration for 1 of 2 nursing units. The findings included: Surveyor observed a medication pass and pour with licensed practical nurse (LPN#1) on 4/30/25. At 9:16 AM surveyor observed LPN#1 place 1 tablet of a medication for Resident #198 in a small plastic pill cup. LPN#1 was then observed to place another medication cup with medications for Resident #199 on top of Resident #198's pill cup. LPN #1 then took both pill cups (stacked together) into Resident #199's room and administered medications to Resident #199. The nurse then proceeded to take Resident #198's medication to his room for administration. At 9:18 AM, LPN#1 began the medication pass for Resident #201 and donned gloves. She pulled the medications with gloves and then scored a Lasix tablet while wearing the same gloves. At 9:31 AM, LPN#1 took the pill cup containing the left-over ½ of Lasix tablet into Resident #201's bathroom and discarded it into the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0941 — isolatedDevelop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program that includes effective communications for direct care staff members.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide effective communication training for one of five sampled direct care staff members, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #1. The findings included: The facility staff failed to provide evidence of effective communication training for CNA #1. On 5/06/25, surveyor reviewed CNA #1's provided in-service training record. The record failed to include evidence of effective communication training. Surveyor requested and received the Facility assessment dated [DATE] which read in part .Our facility makes a good faith effort to provide the staff training/education and competencies necessary to provide the level and types of support and care needed for our resident population. Our facility has identified the following training topics that may be utilized by our staff including managers, nursing, direct care staff, contracted individuals and volunteers consistent with their expected roles. This is not an inclusive list. Communication:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-07 · tag F0839 — isolatedEmploy staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure professional staff had a valid license to practice in accordance with applicable state laws for 1 of 6 sampled licensed nurses, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #12. The findings included: For LPN #12, the facility staff failed to ensure the nurse had a valid LPN license to practice in the Commonwealth of Virginia. LPN #12 was no longer employed at the facility. On 4/30/25, surveyor requested and received LPN #12's employee file which indicated they were hired on 3/06/23. LPN #12's employee records included a [NAME] Virginia (WV) State Board of Examiners for Licensed Practical Nurses Primary Source License Verification Report dated 3/06/23 at 10:26 AM indicating LPN #12 had an active WV Single State LPN license with an expiration date of 6/30/23. An undated, unsigned, handwritten note on the license verification report stated, applied for multi state lic. LPN #12's file also included an additional license verification report dated 4/27/23 also indicating the LPN had a single state WV LPN…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0711 — widespreadEnsure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure that medical providers co-signed verbal orders, telephone orders, and/or orders documented in the Rounding Binders. The findings include: Review of residents' electronic orders failed to show evidence of orders being co-signed by the medical provider who had given the orders. On 1/30/24 at 11:10 a.m., Nurse Practitioner (NP) #1 reported they do not enter their own orders into the residents' electronic record. NP #1 stated orders are given by telephone, verbal, and/or entered into the communication book. NP #1 reported they do not co-sign orders that are entered into the residents' electronic clinical record. NP #1 stated, in the past they had been given a printed page to sign that contained multiple orders for a single resident; NP #1 reported this has not occurred for at least two (2) months. The following information was found in a facility document titled Verbal Orders (with a revised date of September 2017): - Verbal (also called telephone) orders shall be written…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to notify a medical provider and/or a responsible party of a change in condition for two (2) of 12 sampled residents (Resident #2 and Resident #11). The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to promptly notify a medical provider of Resident #11 developing symptoms which could have been an indication of a medical emergency. A communication form, which included information on multiple residents, indicated Resident #11 experienced slurred speech, facial droop, and weakness. This entry was not timed, dated, or signed by a facility staff member. A medical provider documented on the same form (m)eds adjusted and no facial (d)[NAME] noted; the medical provider did not date, time, or sign their entry on this document. This document was not maintained as part of Resident #11's clinical record (multiple residents had information documented on this form). The top of this form included the date of 6/30/23.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for one (1) of 12 sampled residents (Resident #11). The findings include: The facility staff failed to complete a significant change MDS for Resident #11. Resident #11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/21/23, was signed as completed on 6/22/23. Resident #11 was assessed as being able to make self understood and as being able to understand others. Resident #11's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 15 out of 15; this indicated intact and/or borderline cognition. Resident #11 was assessed as requiring assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and bathing. Resident #11 experience multiple changes in their condition after the completion of the MDS assessment with an ARD of 6/21/23. - On 6/27/23, Resident #11 was ordered oxygen. - On 6/30/23, Resident #11 was documented as having suicidal thoughts. - On 7/1/23,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive care plan for one of 12 residents in the survey sample. The findings include: For resident # 10, the facility staff failed to update the comprehensive care plan to include the need and insertion of a foley catheter, and to address a significant weight loss. This was a closed record review. Resident # 10's diagnosis included but were not limited to, essential hypertension, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, edema, muscle weakness, osteoarthritis and major depressive disorder. Resident # 10's minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 11/15/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 8 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. In the clinical record, a progress note from the Nurse Practitioner dated 12/7/23 read in part, Chief complaint: decreased urinary output. History of present illness: staff reports that patient has had little to none urinary output. Patient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to follow professional standards of practice for 1 of 12 residents sampled, Resident #1. The findings were: On 05/02/23, a licensed practical nurse (LPN #4) failed to ensure the eight rights of medication administration were followed as evidenced by administering Resident #1 an unnamed resident's medications. The facility's drug handbook was provided and reviewed. The Nursing2016 Drug Handbook dated 2016 contained the eight rights of medication administration on page 17. It read in part, Traditionally, nurses have been taught the 'five rights' of medication administration. These are broadly stated goals and practices to help individual nurses administer drugs safely. 1. The right drug . 2. The right patient: Confirm the patient's identity by checking two patient identifiers. 3. The right dose . 4. The right time . 5. The right route . In addition to the traditional 'five rights' of individual practice, best-practice researchers have added three additional 'rights': 6. The right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide activities of daily living (ADL) care to two of 12 residents, resident # 10 and resident # 12. The findings include: 1. For resident #10 the facility staff failed to provide ADL care in regard to bathing. This was a closed record review. Resident # 10's diagnosis included but were not limited to, essential hypertension, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, edema, muscle weakness, osteoarthritis and major depressive disorder. Resident # 10's minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 11/15/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 8 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Resident # 10's care plan had a focus that read, Resident requires staff assistance to complete activities of daily living. and a goal that read, Resident will have assistance as needed to complete toileting, bathing, dressing, grooming to maintain dignity Staff will provide assistance with transfers, ambulation. and or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, clinical record reviews, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide treatment and care to address residents' needs for three (3) of 12 sampled residents. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to provide immediate care to Resident #11 when the resident was experiencing slurred speech, facial droop, and weakness. The facility staff failed to provide skin/wound care according to medical provider orders and/or facility policies. Resident #11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/21/23, was signed as completed on 6/22/23. Resident #11 was assessed as being able to make self understood and as being able to understand others. Resident #11's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 15 out of 15; this indicated intact and/or borderline cognition. Resident #11 was assessed as requiring assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and bathing. The facility staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility failed to provide an environment free from accidents and hazards for two of 12 residents, resident # 10 and # 12. The findings include: 1. For resident # 10 the facility staff failed to assess fall risk and failed to implement interventions to reduce the risk of falls. Review of resident # 10's clinical record revealed they fell on 3/9/23, 3/21/23, 5/11/23, 6/4/23, and 7/29/23. The progress notes were reviewed. The note on 3/9/23 indicated that resident # 10 fell while reaching for something. There was no intervention mentioned in the note. There was no fall assessment to correspond with the fall. The note on 3/21/23 indicated that resident had a fall. There was no intervention mentioned in the note. There was no fall assessment to correspond with the fall. A note on 5/11/23 stated resident # 10 slipped off the commode to the floor. There was no mention of an intervention in the note. There was no fall assessment to correspond with the fall. A note on 6/4/23 read that resident had a fall to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure residents maintained, to the extent possible, acceptable parameters of nutritional status. The findings include: For resident # 10, the facility staff failed to prevent a significant weight loss over six months. This was a closed record review. Resident # 10's diagnosis included but were not limited to, essential hypertension, atrial fibrillation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, edema, muscle weakness, osteoarthritis and major depressive disorder. Resident # 10's minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 11/15/23 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 8 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Review of resident # 10's clinical record revealed a weight of 160.1 pounds in August and September of 2023 and a weight of 134.8 pounds in November 2023. There was no October weight documented. A progress note dated 11/24/23 and signed by the Registered Dietician read, CBW: 134#, BMI: 22.43 WNL. Weight triggered for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide respiratory care and/or treatment to address the needs of one (1) of 12 sampled residents (Resident #5). The findings include: Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #6 failed to provide Resident #5's the correct nebulizer medication on 1/26/24. Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/24/24, was signed as completed on 1/25/24. Resident #5 was documented as able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #5's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 15 out of 15; this indicated intact and/or borderline cognition. Resident #5 was documented as requiring assistance with toileting hygiene, shower/bathing, and dressing. On 1/31/24 at 2:20 p.m., LPN #6 reported they provided Resident #5 a nebulizer treatment on 1/26/24. On 2/1/24 at 12:45 p.m., the facility's Administrator confirmed there was not a note on 1/26/24 in Resident #5's chart about a nebulizer treatment being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide social services according to a medical provider's guidance for one (1) of twelve sampled residents (Resident #11). The findings include: The facility staff failed to provide social services care according to Resident #11's medical provider's instructions. Resident #11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/21/23, was signed as completed on 6/22/23. Resident #11 was assessed as able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #11's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 15 out of 15; this indicated intact and/or borderline cognition. Resident #11 was assessed as requiring assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and bathing. The following statement was found as part of a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner (PMHNP) progress note for Resident #11 (this progress note had a date of service as 6/29/23): Referral [sic] patient to social worker…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a resident was free of an unnecessary medication for one (1) of 12 sampled residents (Resident #11). The findings include: The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #11's was free of unnecessary medications. The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #11 was correctly administered olanzapine (an antipsychotic medication). The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #11 was monitored for side effects and behaviors related to receiving olanzapine. Resident #11's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/21/23, was signed as completed on 6/22/23. Resident #11 was assessed as able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #11's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 15 out of 15; this indicated intact and/or borderline cognition. Resident #11 was assessed as requiring assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toilet use, and bathing. Resident #11's Interim…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain complete and/or accurate clinical records for two (2) of 12 sampled residents (Resident #5 and Resident #10). The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to document Resident #5's respiratory care received on 1/26/24. Resident #5's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/24/24, was signed as completed on 1/25/24. Resident #5 was documented as able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #5's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a 15 out of 15; this indicated intact and/or borderline cognition. Resident #5 was documented as requiring assistance with toileting hygiene, shower/bathing, and dressing. On 1/31/24 at 2:20 p.m., LPN #6 reported they provided Resident #5 a nebulizer treatment on 1/26/24. On 2/1/24 at 12:45 p.m., the facility's Administrator confirmed there was not a note on 1/26/24 in Resident #5's chart about a nebulizer treatment being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility document review, (a) the facility staff failed to correctly perform hand hygiene during wound care for one (1) of 12 sampled residents (Resident #4) and (b) the facility staff failed to store residents' nebulizer equipment in a sanitary manner for three (3) of four (4) residents observed with nebulizer equipment (Resident #5, Resident #6, and Resident #8). The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to correctly perform hand hygiene/hand washing during Resident #4's wound care. Resident #4's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/8/24, was signed as completed on 1/10/24. Resident #4 was documented as sometimes able to make self understood and as able to understand others. Resident #4's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score was documented as a two (2) out of 15; this indicated severe cognitive impairment. Resident #4 was documented as being dependent for eating, toileting hygiene, shower/bathing, and dressing. On 2/2/24 at 9:40 a.m.,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, and document review, the facility staff failed to maintain residents' nebulizer equipment according to manufacturer's directions for use. The findings include: The facility staff failed to ensure nebulizer machines were maintained according to manufacturers' guidance. The facility staff also failed to ensure the nebulizer machines used by the facility were appropriate for multiple-patient medical facilities. Observations indicated the facility was using at least three (3) different types of nebulizer machines for patient care. Two types of the nebulizer machines (Nebulizer Machine #1 and Nebulizer Machine #2) were selected for review of the manufacturers' guidance/instructions. Nebulizer Machine #1's manufacturer's guidance included the following information: - (Device name omitted) is an AC-powered air compressor nebulizer system intended to provide a source of compressed air for medical purposes in home healthcare. - Check the filter at least once each week. Replace the filter when dirty. On 1/31/24 at 4:00 p.m., the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to complete drug regimen reviews for 2 of 18 Residents Resident #28 and #42 and failed to act upon recommendations for 1 of 18 resident #28. The facility staff failed to provide the surveyor with evidence of drug regimen reviews that were completed in March 2022 for Resident #28 and #42 and failed to follow up on pharmacy recommendations for Residents #28. The findings included: 1. Resident #28 had been admitted to the facility after the previous standard survey. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #28's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 03/02/22 included a Brief Interview for Mental Status Summary (BIMS) score of 11 out of a possible 15 points. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Parkinson's disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and hypertension. During the record review, the surveyor was unable to find any evidence of a drug regimen review that was completed for March 2022. On 05/12/22 9:40 a.m., the Assistant Director of Nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-05-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure a complete, and accurately documented clinical record for 1 of 18 residents in the survey sample (Resident #45). For Resident #45, the facility staff failed to document the resident's blood glucose readings. The findings included: Resident #45's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 3, Acute on Chronic Congestive Heart Failure, Paranoid Schizophrenia, Bipolar II Disorder, and Chronic Respiratory Failure. The most recent quarterly minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/28/22 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 12 out of 15 indicating Resident #45 was moderately cognitively impaired. Upon surveyor review on 5/10/22, Resident #45's current physician's orders included an order dated 3/28/22 for accuchecks twice daily and notify MD/NP (nurse practitioner) of blood glucose less than 60 or above 400. Surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-05-12 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — isolatedPerform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and document review the facility staff failed to properly implement COVID-19 testing processes and/or procedures for 1 of 1 COVID-19 staff testing observations, CNA#1. An observation of the staffing coordinator (CNA#1) obtaining a COVID-19 nasal swab test for one licensed practical nurse (LPN) identified the specimen was not collected according to manufacturer's instructions. The findings were: On 5/10/2022 at 2:38 p.m., the staffing coordinator (CNA#1) was observed obtaining a COVID-19 nasal swab test from a licensed practical nurse (LPN). Prior to obtaining the LPN's specimen, CNA#1 described the process for swabbing the nostrils. She reported rotating the swab inside each nare for approximately 5 seconds each side. The surveyor observed CNA#1 place the swab inside one nostril and rotate it 5 times and then repeating the process in the other nostril. The surveyor timed the collection which lasted 6-7 seconds in total. CNA#1 acknowledged she rotated the swab for about 3 seconds in each nostril and reported being taught how to collect the specimens…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-06-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow the bowel protocol for 1 of 25 residents (Resident #17). The findings included: The facility staff failed to follow the bowel protocol for bowel management for Resident #17. The clinical record of Resident #17 was reviewed 6/4/19 through 6/7/19. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility 3/23/18 with diagnoses, that included but not limited to multiple sclerosis, urinary tract infection, cellulitis and abscess of the mouth, major depressive disorder, chronic pain syndrome, anxiety, insomnia, slow transit constipation, tobacco use, nicotine dependence, iron deficiency anemia, and dysuria. Resident #17's annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/12/19 assessed the resident with a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) as 15/15. Section H assessed that the resident was always incontinent of bowel. Bowel Patterns was marked that constipation was present. Resident #17's current comprehensive care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-06-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure 4 of 25 residents were free of an unnecessary psychotropic medication (Resident #87, Resident #26, Resident #62, and Resident #105). The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to identify and monitor resident specific target behaviors, identify non-pharmacological interventions, and monitor for effectiveness associated with the use of Trazodone for Resident # 87. The clinical record of Resident #87 was reviewed 6/4/19 through 6/7/19. Resident #87 was admitted to the facility 5/3/17 with diagnoses that included but not limited to flaccid hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, epilepsy, quadriplegia, chronic pain, anemia, hyperlipidemia, dementia without behavioral disturbances, and seborrheic dermatitis. Resident #87's annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 5/7/19 assessed the resident with a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) as 6/15.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-06-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to dispose of expired medications on 2 of 2 units. The findings included: 1. The facility failed to dispose of expired medications on unit B. The surveyor checked cart #1 on the B unit on 06/05/19 at 3:44 p.m. with LPN #10. This medication cart included 1 opened box of culturelle that contained 15 capsules. The expiration date on the box was 05/2019. LPN #10 stated she was going to discard this medication. The surveyor and LPN #10 then checked the medication room. The medication room included 2-30 capsule boxes of culturelle with an expiration date of 05/2019, 4-60 soft gel bottles of flaxseed oil 1000 mg with an expiration date of 03/2018, 9-100 tablet bottles of vitamin D with a use by date of 01/2019, and 1-10 ounce bottle of mag citrate with an expiration date of 03/2019. LPN #10 stated she would discard this medication. The administrative staff were notified of the issue with the expired medications on 06/05/19 at approximately 4:45 p.m. No further information regarding this issue was provided to the survey…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-06-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure food was palatable and served at an appetizing temperature on one of two units (unit B). The findings included: The facility staff failed to provide palatable foods at an appropriate temperature to residents on unit B. During the survey from 6/4/19 through 6/7/19, three resident interviews were completed with Resident #40, Resident #87, and Resident #17. Resident #40 stated the food was always cold. Resident #87 stated the food was cold. Resident #17 stated the food was terrible and the menu was a lie. We get soup every day. The surveyor conducted a lunch test tray on 6/6/19 beginning at 11:26 a.m. Food temperatures obtained at 11:26 a.m. were as follows: Coffee-133 degrees Iced tea-36.8 degrees Milk-33.4 degrees Creamed green beans (pureed)-176 degrees Green beans-200 degrees Mashed potatoes-179 degrees Pureed sloppy joes-191 degrees Pork chops-175 degrees Sloppy [NAME]-167 degrees…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide a dignified dining experience for 3 of 25 residents (Resident # 87, Resident #62, and Resident #40) and failed to knock or announce themselves before entering residents rooms for 1 of 25 residents (Resident #17). The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to provide a dignified dining experience for Resident #87. Resident #87's roommate (Resident # 105) was served breakfast 30 minutes before Resident #87 received his tray. Resident #87's roommate completed breakfast before the resident received his breakfast tray. Resident #87 stated the breakfast was cold when the tray arrived. The clinical record of Resident #87 was reviewed 6/4/19 through 6/7/19. Resident #87 was admitted to the facility 5/3/17 with diagnoses that included but not limited to flaccid hemiplegia affecting right dominant side, epilepsy, quadriplegia, chronic pain, anemia, hyperlipidemia, dementia without behavioral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to notify the physician of a change in condition and failed to inform a resident that he would not receive ferrous sulfate during his morning medication pass for 2 of 25 residents in the survey sample (Residents #17 and #59). The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to inform the physician of a change in condition when medication (Methadone) was not available for Resident #17. The clinical record of Resident #17 was reviewed 6/4/19 through 6/7/19. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility 3/23/18 with diagnoses, that included but not limited to multiple sclerosis, urinary tract infection, cellulitis and abscess of the mouth, major depressive disorder, chronic pain syndrome, anxiety, insomnia, slow transit constipation, tobacco use, nicotine dependence, iron deficiency anemia, and dysuria. Resident #17's annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/12/19 assessed the resident with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for 1of 25 residents (Resident #26). The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #26's Broda chair was clean. The clinical record of Resident #26 was reviewed 6/4/19 through 6/7/19. Resident #26 was admitted to the facility 12/30/15 with diagnoses that included but not limited to Alzheimer's disease, orthostatic hypotension, pain, anxiety, syncope and collapse, adult failure to thrive, irritable bowel syndrome without diarrhea, and unspecified mood. Resident #26's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/19/19 assessed the resident with a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) Summary Score as 2/15. The surveyor observed Resident #26 during the initial tour on 6/4/19 at 2:30 p.m. The resident was observed sitting in the dining room in a Broda chair. The surveyor observed both armrests with food debris on them. The surveyor observed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-07 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review, facility staff failed to ensure accuracy of Minimum Data Set assessments for 2 of 26 residents in the survey sample (Resident #104 and supplemental resident #1). 1. For Resident #104, facility staff failed to ensure the admission minimum data set assessment accurately documented hospice and hemodialysis status. Resident #104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] 04:05 PM. Diagnoses included hypertension, end stage Alzheimer's disease, malnutrition, anxiety, and depression. On the admission Minimum Data Set assessment with Assessment Reference Date 5/20/19, the resident was assessed with short and long-term memory deficits, severely impaired decision-making ability, fluctuating signs of delirium, and without signs of psychosis or delirium. The resident was admitted with an order for hospice (5/9/19). The MD'S was not coded for hospice. The MD'S was coded for dialysis. The resident did not have an order for hemodialysis or a renal failure diagnosis. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive plan of care for 1 of 26 Residents in the survey sample, Resident # 41. The findings included: The facility staff failed to review and revise the comprehensive plan of care for Resident # 41 to include port-a-cath. Resident # 41 was a [AGE] year-old-female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission date of 5/31/18. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, chronic kidney disease, vitamin E deficiency, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure. The clinical record for Resident # 41 was reviewed on 6/4/19 at 1:37 pm. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment for Resident # 41 was a quarterly assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 4/4/19. Section C of the MDS assesses cognitive patterns. In Section C0500, the facility staff documented that Resident # 41 had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 12 out of 15, which indicated that Resident # 41's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, family interview, staff interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide nail care to 1 of 25 dependent residents (Resident #62). The findings included: The facility staff failed to provide nail care to Resident #62. The clinical record of Resident #62 was reviewed 6/4/19 through 6/7/19. Resident #62 was admitted to the facility 11/18/11 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to pulmonary embolism, mild protein malnutrition, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, anxiety, depression, hypokalemia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, irritable bowel syndrome, constipation, and chronic kidney disease, stage 3. Resident #62's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 4/18/19 assessed the resident with a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) Summary Score as 13/15. No signs or symptoms of behaviors affecting others, delirium, or psychosis. Resident #62 was assessed to require…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-07 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to follow the physician's orders for 1 of 25 residents (Resident #40) for the care of an indwelling Foley catheters. The findings included: The facility staff failed to ensure Resident #40 received the appropriate size of Foley catheter. The clinical record of Resident #40 was reviewed 6/4/19 through 6/7/19. Resident #40 was admitted to the facility 1/18/17 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to hemiplegia affecting left non-dominant side, mood disorder, type 2 diabetes mellitus, major depression, anxiety, sacral pressure ulcer, stage 4, urinary tract infection with extended spectrum beta lactamase resistance (ESBL), subacute osteomyelitis of left ankle and foot, hypertension, iron deficiency anemia, peripheral vascular disease, conduct disorder, and edema. Resident #40's significant change in assessment minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-07 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure that 1 of 26 Residents in the survey sample received port-a-cath care consistent with professional standards of practice, Resident # 41. The findings included: a. The facility staff failed to follow physician's order to flush port-a-cath every month for Resident # 41. b. The facility staff failed to ensure that the port-a-cath for Resident # 41 was accessed and flushed by a Registered Nurse. c. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident # 41's port-a-cath orders specified what the port-a-cath was to be flushed with, the amount that was to be flushed, and the date the port-a-cath was to be flushed on. Resident # 41 was a [AGE] year-old-female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a readmission date of 5/31/18. Diagnoses included but were not limited to, chronic kidney disease, vitamin E deficiency, atrial fibrillation, and heart failure. The clinical record for Resident # 41 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, Resident interview, facility document review, and clinical record review the facility staff failed to properly maintain oxygen equipment or to deliver the ordered dose for 3 of 26 Residents, Resident #52, Resident #59. and Resident #62). The findings included: 1. For Resident #52 the facility staff failed to ensure the Resident's C-PAP (continuous-positive airway pressure) mask was covered/bagged when not in use. Resident #52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to hypertension, urinary tract infection, diabetes mellitus, anxiety, depression, bipolar disorder, constipation, gastroesophageal reflux disease, sleep apnea, and obsessive-compulsive disorder. The most recent MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 04/12/19 coded the Resident as 14 out of 15 in section C, cognitive patterns. This is a quarterly MDS. Surveyor spoke with Resident #52 on 06/04/19 at approximately 1400. Surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-07 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, facility document review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide pain management to 1 of 25 residents (Resident #17). The findings included: The facility staff failed to administer pain medications per physician orders to Resident #17. The clinical record of Resident #17 was reviewed 6/4/19 through 6/7/19. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility 3/23/18 with diagnoses, that included but not limited to multiple sclerosis, urinary tract infection, cellulitis and abscess of the mouth, major depressive disorder, chronic pain syndrome, anxiety, insomnia, slow transit constipation, tobacco use, nicotine dependence, iron deficiency anemia, and dysuria. Resident #17's annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/12/19 assessed the resident with a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) as 15/15. Section J Health Conditions was marked that Resident #17 received scheduled pain medication and prn (as needed) pain medication. Resident #17 did not receive non-medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, failed to ensure physician ordered medications were available for 1 out of 25 residents (Resident #17).1. The facility staff failed to ensure physician ordered medications were available for Resident #17. Methadone, Oxycodone, and a Nicoderm patch were not available for administration. The clinical record of Resident #17 was reviewed 6/4/19 through 6/7/19. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility 3/23/18 with diagnoses, that included but not limited to multiple sclerosis, urinary tract infection, cellulitis and abscess of the mouth, major depressive disorder, chronic pain syndrome, anxiety, insomnia, slow transit constipation, tobacco use, nicotine dependence, iron deficiency anemia, and dysuria. Resident #17's annual minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/12/19 assessed the resident with a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) as 15/15. The surveyor interviewed Resident #17 on 6/5/19 at 2:51 p.m. During the interview, Resident #17 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-06-07 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, and medication pass and pour observation the facility staff failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. There were 3 errors in 31 opportunities resulting in a medication error rate of 9.68 %. Medication errors affected Resident # 76, Resident # 83, and Resident # 59. The findings included The facility staff had a 9.68% medication error rate following medication pass and pour observation. On 6/5/19 at 7:36 am, the surveyor conducted a medication pass and pour observation with LPN # 2 (licensed practical nurse). The surveyor observed LPN # 2 as she prepared and administered medications to Resident # 76 (unsampled). The surveyor observed LPN # 2 as she prepared Apriso 0.375 gm (gram) 4 capsules. The surveyor observed LPN # 2 as she opened the 4 capsules of Apriso and sprinkled the contents of the capsules in applesauce. The surveyor observed LPN # 2 as she administered the medications to Resident # 76. After the medication administration observation the surveyor utilized Resident # 76's clinical record to reconcile the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure three of 26 Residents were free of significant medication errors, Resident #33, Resident #25 and Resident #40. The findings included: 1. For Resident #33 the facility staff held the long acting insulin, Levimir, without a physician's order. Resident #33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to hypertension, peripheral vascular disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease, diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer's disease, dementia and malnutrition. The most recent annual MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 03/22/19 assigned the Resident a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 3 out of 15 points in section C, cognitive patterns. Resident #33's CCP (comprehensive care plan) was reviewed and contained a care plan for I have diabetes. Approaches for this care plan include Administer medications as ordered. Resident #33's clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-06-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, facility document review and clinical record review facility staff failed to ensure infection treatment as ordered for 1 of 26 residents in the survey sample (Resident #77) and proper hand-washing. Resident #77 Infections (not UTI or Respiratory) 06/05/19 11:36 AM resident reported that staff had run out of his antibiotic while he was here. He is on nafcillin 2 gm in 50 ml ns at 50 ml/hr every 4 hours for 8 weeks from 4/22-6/14. MAR indicated 'N' on 6/2 at 9AM, 1 PM, 5 PM, and 9 PM and on 6/3 at 1 AM; in May MAR indicated 'N' on 5/7 at 5 PM, and many other times. Notes indicate the medication will be administered when meds are available or that the medication was not available. During an interview on 6/6/19, the assistant director of nursing reported that, in her role as infection control nurse, she does not track whether resident receive antibiotics as ordered. 2. The facility staff failed to implement proper handwashing practices during medication pass and pour observation and failed to clean durable medical equipment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$111,911 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $111,911 — penalty dated 2025-05-07
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $754K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495349. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.