Greensboro Nursing Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

45.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.48 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 79% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 30 beds and averages 26.4 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.11 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.63 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.29 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.48 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and policy review, it was determined that the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the potential to impact all residents. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during the previous recertification survey dated 6/11/25. Findings include: During observations and interview on 5/19/26 at 2:49 PM, a dietary staff member confirmed there were no expiration dates for the following items:-Two six-pound ten-ounce cans of cream style corn in dry storage.-One six pound can of mandarin oranges in a light syrup in dry storage.-Twelve ounces of a turkey gravy mix in dry storage.-One gallon of buttermilk ranch dressing in the refrigerator.-One gallon of creamy Italian dressing in the refrigerator.-One sixteen-ounce container of a beef base in the refrigerator.During observations and interview on 5/20/26 at 10:51 AM with the kitchen manager, she stated that there are some food items that don't arrive with an expiration date. The kitchen manager then confirmed the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record clearly communicated the resident's code status for 1 of 17 sampled residents (Resident #4). Findings include:Per record review, Resident #4 did not have a COLST (Clinician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment). The resident's profile page in the Electronic Health Record (EHR) stated Resident #4 was a full code. Resident #4 has a care plan intervention dated 2/26/26 that stated the resident was a DNR/DNI (Do not resuscitate/Do not intubate) and that care limiting orders were in place if the resident were to be found unconscious, without a pulse, or not breathing. Additionally, there was no code status order. A provider note from 3/12/26 states the resident code status is a full code (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Intubation).Per interview with Resident #4's responsible party on 5/18/26, she reported that Resident #4 has a code status of a DNR.Per interview with the Nurse Manager on 5/19/26 at 9:09 AM and 10:04 AM, she confirmed that there should be a code status order for the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident [Resident #28] of 17 sampled residents remained free from physical abuse regarding a resident-to-resident altercation. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during a previous partial survey dated 12/22/25. Findings include: Per record review, Resident #26 has diagnoses that include dementia with behavioral disturbance, visual hallucinations, Alzheimer's disease, anxiety disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #26's Care Plan reveals the resident is identified as having the potential to be physically aggressive to other resident's related to Dementia, history of aggressive behaviors: resident to resident- [Resident #26] struck another resident [8/16/2024].Resident #26's Care Plan also identifies the resident as having a behavior problem related to inability to accept minor and major changes in h/her environment, poor impulse control manifested by pacing, yelling, history of hallucinations, swearing, muttering to self, refusing to participate in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-20 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that their policies related to screening for abuse via background checks had been implemented for 2 of 5 employees (LNAs #1 and #2). Findings include:Per record review of the facility policy titled Background Screening Investigations no date, it states Our facility Conducts employment background screening checks, reference checks and criminal conviction investigation checks on all applicants for positions with direct access to residents ( direct access employees).Background and criminal checks are initiated within two days of an offer of employment or contract agreement, and completed prior to employment.Per record review, LNA (Licensed Nursing Assistant) #1 was hired on 7/8/25 and LNA #2 was hired on 8/29/25. LNA #1 and LNA #2 did not have [NAME] State Criminal background checks prior to 5/19/26.Per interview on 5/20/26 at 10:02 AM, the Administrator confirmed that the [NAME] State Criminal background checks had been completed yesterday,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure documentation was accurate and true for one of three sample residents (Resident #1). Findings include:Per record review, Resident #1 has diagnoses of COPD [Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Type II Diabetes, Atrial fibrillation [a condition in which the heart beats irregularly] and Parkinson's disease. Resident #1 had a BIMS [Brief Interview of Mental Status] score of 3 as of 1/15/26 indicating cognitive impairment; was dependent on staff for ADLs [Activities of Daily Living] and hygiene; and was at risk for falls related to deconditioning, gait/balance problems, and Parkinson's.Per review of a nursing progress from 2/19/26, it states, Pt [Patient] was trying to transfer self from [his/her] wheelchair to without assistance. This writer was in the room with [his/her] roommate and witnessed this. Pt stood up and sat back down on the floor on [his/her] rear. Once on [his/her] rear [s/he] started turning towards the nurse and laid out. Stated I was going to bed, but the floor misses me laughing and cracking jokes.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-22 · tag F0552 — pattern
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure three of three residents sampled (Resident#1, #2, and #3) were able to be informed to make treatment decisions by failing to have the resident or resident representative sign consent for prescribed psychotropic medication. Findings include:Per review of Resident #1's medical record, Resident #1 has a BIMS [Brief Interview of Mental Status] score of 3 as of 10/27/25 indicating they have cognitive impairment. Resident #1 is dependent on staff for ADLs [Activities of Daily Living] and hygiene. S/he has medical diagnoses of Alzheimer's Disease and peripheral vascular disease. On 12/11/25 Resident #1 was prescribed Quetiapine fumarate [an antipsychotic medication used to treat symptoms of psychosis] 25 mg [milligram] tablet: Give 25 mg by mouth one time a day related to Alzheimer's Disease with early onset.Per review of Resident #2's medical record, s/he has a BIMS of 0 as of 12/16/25, indicating severe cognitive impairment. They have medical diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease, epilepsy and depression. Resident #2 is…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from verbal abuse by a visitor for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #3). Findings include:Per record review of Resident #1, a progress note written by the Social Worker on 12/17/25 states, The Central Supply Manager came to staff and reported that this resident's [spouse] was being verbally abusive to this resident. Another family member of a different resident came to staff and told our DON [Director of Nursing] that this residents [spouse] confronted another resident and was verbally abusive. The staff member, central supply manager has put in a report to APS [Adult Protective Services].Per record review of Resident #1, a progress note written by the DON on 12/17/25 states, Visitor came to this writer and ADON [Assistant Director of Nursing] at 1:25 PM to report that resident's [spouse] was in the hallway next resident's room [ROOM NUMBER] when [Resident #3] was walking by with [her/his]…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report incidences of abuse for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #3). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous recertification surveys dated 6/11/25. Findings include:Per record review of Resident #1's chart, progress note written by the Social Worker on 12/17/25 states, The Central Supply Manager came to staff and reported that this resident's [spouse] was being verbally abusive to this resident. Another family member of a different resident came to staff and told our DON [Director of Nursing] that this residents [spouse] confronted another resident and was verbally abusive. The staff member, central supply manager has put in a report to APS [Adult Protective Services].Per record review of Resident #1's chart, progress note written by the DON on 12/17/25 states, Visitor came to this writer and ADON [ Assistant Director of Nursing] at 1:25 PM to report that resident's [spouse] was in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of verbal abuse, send a summary of the investigation to the State Survey Agency, and take appropriate corrective action for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #3). Findings include:Per record review of Resident #1, a progress note written by the DON on 12/17/25 states, Visitor came to this writer and ADON [Assistant Director of Nursing] at 1:25 PM to report that resident's [spouse] was in the hallway next resident's room [ROOM NUMBER] when [Resident #3] was walking by with [her/his] walker. [Resident #1's spouse] per visitor statement got into [Resident #3's] space and pointed [her/his] finger at [Resident #3] and stated [He/she] is my [spouse] and you need to leave [him/her] alone. I do not want you around [him/her] at all. Per visitor [Resident #3] started to tear up and visitor intervened and asked [Resident #3] to walk into the main dining area and have a seat. [Resident #1's spouse] then took…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-06-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were removed from the medication storage room when expiration dates were reached. Findings include: Per observation on [DATE] at 1:18 PM of the medication cart, an 8 oz [ounce] Spectrum Hand Sanitizer was found with an expiration date of [DATE]. A package of (3) Sani-cloth germicidal disposable wipes were found in the medication cart with an expiration date of 1/25. On [DATE] at 1:20 PM LPN#1(Licensed Practical Nurse) confirmed that these medications/biologicals were expired and stated, I'll get rid of these.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VT