No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Springfield Health & Rehab

105 Chester Road, Springfield, VT 05156 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 102 certified beds · (802) 885-5741 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Special Focus Facility (federal watch list)Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)9 immediate-jeopardy citations$354,247 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Nov 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 9 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (79) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $354,247 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-03)
  • nursing-staff turnover (69%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 51% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

/5
CMS overall
Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verifiedNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ)Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facilityNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
Hospital, 25 Ridgewood Road level d · (802) 885-7561 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
242 River St · (802) 885-4222 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Shaw's0.7 mi
82 Springfield Plz · (802) 885-8450 · Call to confirm hours
Park
100 Mineral St Ste 304 · (802) 777-6899 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measuresNot rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-04, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2026-04 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.

Overall ratingnot rated now
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.4%19.3%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.4%6.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.7%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.2%2.4%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms35.5%13.0%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.6%5.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened12.2%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.9%16.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine90.1%97.5%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.8%5.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.0%26.8%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table17.8%19.9%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine46.3%78.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.6%22.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.5%17.9%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.971.521.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days6.062.881.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

33.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
85.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.31U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 85.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.31 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 51% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 27% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF33.7%CMS range 22.9–47.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.6%CMS range 9.8–18.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge85.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge63.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge56.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened6.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 4.5–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.111.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.67
RN hours/ resident / day
0.82
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.39
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.88
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.45
RN hoursweekends
69.0%
Total nursing turnover
71.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 102 beds and averages 71.2 residents a day — about 70% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.67 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.11 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.76 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 69% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

2
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-01)
18
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-27)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

79 citations, most serious first. The 28 most serious are shown; the remaining 51 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0635 — pattern
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately reconcile physician orders needed to provide necessary care and services on admission, once the facility identified an issue with the admission orders, they failed to review the rest of the discharge summary for other potential missed orders for 1 of 3 residents in the sample (Resident #1). All residents admitting or readmitting to the facility are at risk for serious injury or death as a result of noncompliance. This deficient practice rose to the immediate jeopardy level due to the facility's failure to provide accurate admission orders, which resulted in Resident #1 experiencing antipsychotic withdrawal and worsening psychiatric symptoms including refusal of medications and care, unmonitored and untreated blood sugars, increased risk for developing a urinary tract infection, falls resulting in a subdural hematoma that worsened over time resulting in death. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed protect a resident's right to be free from neglect by failing to provide services to the resident that are necessary to avoid physical harm, pain, mental anguish and emotional distress for 1 of 5 residents in the applicable sample (Resident #1).This deficient practice rose to the immediate jeopardy level due to the facility's failure to provide necessary services, which resulted in antipsychotic medication withdrawal, repeated falls with major head injury, and death. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited at immediate jeopardy during a partial survey dated 3/3/25. Findings include:Per record review Resident #1 was admitted to the facility for short term rehab after a fall at their home resulting in a distal radius fracture and multiple fractured ribs. Additional diagnoses included left third finger fracture, urinary tract infection (UTI), osteoporosis, frequent falls, schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, narcolepsy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to develop a care plan or implement interventions specific to the safety risks associated with narcolepsy with cataplexy (sudden weakness or limping of the muscles), risk factors for the use of antipsychotic medications, implement care plan interventions to monitor blood glucose 4 times daily and administer insulin on a sliding scale for a diabetic who was admitted with physician orders to do so, identify safety/fall risk related to complications of the diagnosis of a subdural hematoma for 1 of 3 residents in the sample (Resident #1). This deficient practice rose to the immediate jeopardy level due to the facility's failure to ensure care plans are developed and implemented, which resulted in Resident #1 experiencing a fall that resulted in a head injury with a subdural hematoma that worsened over time and resulted in death. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during a partial survey dated 3/3/25. Findings include:Per record review Resident #1 was admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to effectively assess a resident's risks, implement, monitor, and modify interventions when necessary to prevent falls with major injury resulting in death. The facility also failed to provide necessary treatment of clinical conditions which put the resident at an increased risk of safety and accidents. The facility also failed identify and address potential accident hazards related to the resident's clinical condition. As a result, the resident experienced a recuring UTI, a decline in behavioral health, hyperglycemic episodes, medication withdrawal, and increased fall risk for 1 of 3 Residents in the sample (Resident #1). This deficient practice rose to the immediate jeopardy level due to the facility's failure to prevent falls, which resulted in Resident #1 sustaining two falls resulting in a subdural hematoma that worsened over time resulting in death. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during partial surveys, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Ldisputed · IDR2025-03-03 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility was not administered in a manner that enables it to maintain the physical well-being of each resident, whereby actions and decisions by the facility's leadership team directly contributed to multiple deficiencies that resulted in harm and immediate jeopardy by failing to ensure that the physician was notified of changes, residents were free from abuse, care plans were implemented, pressure ulcer care and prevention was provided, adequate supervision of residents, residents' care is supervised by a physician, the responsibilities of the Medical Director were met, implement an effective infection prevention program, and have a qualified infection preventionist. Findings include: During an investigation of 3 facility reported incidents and 3 complaints, the facility was found to have deficient practices that resulted in 5 citations at Immediate Jeopardy level, 5 harm level citations, and 7 potential for more than minimal harm citations. On [DATE], the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Lcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-03-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement an infection prevention and control program that follows the accepted national standards regarding preventing, identifying and controlling communicable diseases. Specifically, the facility failed to follow the CDC (Centers of Disease Control) and state health department recommendations for outbreak management, related to testing and other mitigation strategies including containment and personal protective equipment (PPE) use. The deficient practices associated with the lack of infection control measures led to the determination that the residents in the facility were in immediate jeopardy of serious harm and/or death. At the time that the facility was notified of the immediate jeopardy on [DATE] at 12:00 PM, 11 residents and 15 staff members had tested positive for COVID-19 since the beginning of the facility outbreak that began on [DATE]. 5 residents (Residents #1, # 3, #13, and #12 and #14) were positive for COVID-19 at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-03-03 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — pattern
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure consultation with the attending physician during a COVID-19 outbreak, and failed to notify the physician of positive COVID-19 results for 3 of 11 residents who tested positive for COVID-19 (Residents #6, #7, and #12). The facility also failed to notify the physician after a resident physically assaulted another resident causing injury (Resident #1 and #4), and at the time of significant changes in condition regarding development of pressure ulcers (Resident #9). This citation is at the immediate jeopardy level due to the lack of notification and consultation with the physician during a COVID-19 outbreak and with significant changes in resident statuses puts all residents at risk for serious injury or death because of the noncompliance. Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #7 was admitted to the facility with the primary diagnosis of a non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI, a type of heart attack), and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-03-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #6) from gaining access to an alarmed stairwell and falling down a flight of 8 stairs, sustaining a head injury. The facility failed to ensure resident safety by not responding timely to a door alarm that is used to alert staff of potential resident elopement. The facility also failed to provide adequate supervision of 2 residents in the applicable sample (Resident #1 and Resident #4) to prevent a resident-to-resident assault that resulted in fear and injury to Resident #4. This citation is at the immediate jeopardy level due to the lack of adequate supervision to prevent mobile residents from entering secured, dangerous areas within the facility, prevent residents from leaving the unit or building, and prevent resident assault, putting all residents at risk for serious injury or death because of the noncompliance. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jdisputed · IDR2025-03-03 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the medical care of each resident is supervised by a physician for 3 of 15 sampled residents (Resident #7, #1, #4). As a result Resident #7 who was positive for COVID, did not receive specific monitoring or treatment for the COVID infection, and died of COVID, Resident #1's violent behaviors continued to put other residents at risk, and Resident #4 suffered injury that was not immediately assessed or treated. This citation is at the immediate jeopardy level due to medical care not being supervised by the physician resulting in residents not being treated for COVID, aggressive behaviors, and failure to assess resident with suspected injury to his/her head. Findings include: 1. Per review of the facility documented COVID-19 line list, Resident #7 tested positive for COVID-19 on [DATE] and was experiencing symptoms of lethargy (a general state of fatigue that involves a lack of energy and motivation for physical and mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1). This deficient practice resulted in harm; Resident #1 had antipsychotic medication withdrawal, increased behavior health distress exhibited by hallucinations, resistive and combativeness with care, and medication refusals; unmonitored and untreated blood sugars; increased risk of urinary tract infection resulting in a hemolytic Strep Group B urinary tract infection, and increased risk for and repeated falls with major head injury, and death. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during two recent partial surveys dated 3/3/25 and 5/28/25. Findings include:Per record review Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for short term rehab after a fall at their home resulting in a distal radius fracture and multiple fractured ribs. Hospital diagnoses included a urinary tract infection (UTI). Per review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a resident for 1 of 3 residents in the sample (Resident #4). As a result, Resident #4 suffered injury and persistent fear that s/he would be physically assaulted again. Findings include: A review of a facility reported incident submitted to the State Agency on 1/9/25 of an allegation of physical abuse related to a resident-to-resident altercation that occurred on 1/8/25 at approximately 5:12 PM, revealed that Resident #1 entered the room of Resident #4 and threw a can of soda at Resident #4's arm causing a skin tear to the left forearm. Resident #4 also suffered a bruise to his/her forehead. A review of the nursing documentation and risk management notes reveals no evidence of how the bruise occurred to Resident #4's forehead. See F689 for more information. Per interview on 1/22/25 at approximately 10:00 AM, Resident #4 stated that Resident #1 came into his/her room while s/he was asleep and threw a 12 pack of soda at his/her face. Per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement care plan interventions related to skin and wound assessments for 1 of 15 residents in the sample (Resident #9). As a result of the failure to follow care plan interventions Resident #9's pressure ulcers worsened. Findings include. 1. Per observation on 1/22/2025 at 3:10 PM a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and Director of Nursing (DON) were observed performing wound care to Resident #9's pressure ulcers. The Resident was noted to have an excoriated sacrum with two open areas that were cleansed and a new dressing was applied. The pressure ulcer on his/her right hip was also cleansed and a new dressing was applied. The pressure ulcer on his/her right malleolus (ankle) was noted to be open with slough around the edges of the wound. This area was also cleansed and a new dressing was applied. There were 2 open area on the Resident's left distal foot that were cleansed and a new dressing applied. This surveyor noted a large dry wound on Resident #9's left lateral foot and asked the LPN and DON if there was a treatment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-03-03 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 3 residents in the applicable sample (Resident #9) received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote healing by not obtaining physician's orders for treatment, not following care plan interventions, and not performing accurate skin and wound assessments. This deficient practice caused Resident #9's wounds to deteriorate, and caused him/her to develop additional pressure ulcers. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous recertification survey, dated 1/10/25. Findings include: Per observation on 1/22/2025 at 3:10 PM a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) and Director of Nursing (DON) were observed performing wound care to Resident #9's pressure ulcers. The Resident was noted to have an excoriated sacrum with two open areas that were cleansed and a new dressing was applied. The pressure ulcer on his/her right hip was also cleansed and a new dressing was applied. The pressure ulcer on his/her right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-03-03 · tag F0841 — isolated
    Designate a physician to serve as medical director responsible for implementation of resident care policies and coordination of medical care in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the medical director fulfilled her responsibilities to effectively implement resident care policies and coordinate medical care for residents in the facility regarding the surveillance of, and development of policies that reflect current professional standards of practice to prevent the spread of potential COVID-19 infection, and coordinate care of residents. This deficient practice resulted in ineffective COVID-19 mitigation, death of a resident from COVID-19, and resident abuse with injury. 1. Per review of the facility documented COVID-19 outbreak line list revealed that 11 Residents and 15 staff members tested positive for COVID-19 between [DATE] and [DATE]. Resident #7 tested positive for COVID-19 on [DATE] and was experiencing symptoms of lethargy (a general state of fatigue that involves a lack of energy and motivation for physical and mental tasks). Per record review, a Progress Note written by a Licensed Practical Nurse on [DATE], 6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2025-03-03 · tag F0882 — isolated
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff member designated as the facility's Infection Preventions (IP) had obtained specialized Infection Prevention and Control training beyond initial professional training. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous two recertification surveys, dated [DATE] and [DATE]. As a result the facility failed to prevent spread of COVID-19 through mitigation strategies that would be directed by an infection preventionist, and 1 resident died from COVID-19 (Resident #7). The failure to designate a qualified infection preventionist has the potential to impact all residents who reside in the facility. Findings include: Record review reveals that 11 residents and 15 staff members had tested positive for COVID-19 during a facility outbreak that began on [DATE]. 5 residents (Residents #1, #3, #13, and #12 and #14) were positive for COVID-19 at the time of survey entrance on [DATE]. Of the 11 residents that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Hcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management that met professional standards for 4 of 7 sampled residents by not recognizing pain or evaluating existing pain and the causes (Resident #1) and revise a resident's care plan to address and manage pain (Residents #1, #3, #5, and #6). As a result, Resident #1 had a pattern of significant, untreated pain. Findings include: Per record review, Resident #1 has diagnoses that include morbid obesity, type 2 diabetes, and history of uterine cancer. A 7/23/24 Nurse Practitioner note reveals that Resident #1 was transferred from the facility to the hospital on 7/11/24 for symptoms of a CVA (stroke). S/He was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] post CVA treatment with aphasia (speech disorder) and left sided hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body). Resident #1's care plan reads, [Resident #1] has acute pain/chronic pain Diabetic neuropathy [nerve damage], revised on 2/3/2023, with the goal The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents remained as free from accidents as possible related to falls for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident #1) by failing to provide adequate supervision and implement care plan interventions that would reduce potential serious consequences if a fall did occur. As a result, Resident #1 suffered a fall that resulted in a hip fracture and significant pain. Findings include: Per record review, Resident #1 has diagnoses that include morbid obesity, anxiety, and history of uterine cancer. A 7/23/24 Nurse Practitioner (NP) note reveals that Resident #1 was transferred from the facility to the hospital on 7/11/24 for symptoms of a CVA (stroke). S/He was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] post CVA treatment with aphasia (speech disorder) and left sided hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body). Resident #1 has the following care plan focuses, [Resident #1] is at risk for falls secondary to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-10-18 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to identify a resident at risk for impaired hydration status, address risk factors for impaired hydration status, and ensure that a resident receive sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health for 5 of 7 sampled residents (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, and #5). As a result, Resident #1 was admitted to the hospital with dehydration, a urinary tract infection (UTI), and developed a stage 2 pressure ulcer. Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #1 has diagnoses that include morbid obesity, type 2 diabetes, chronic kidney disease, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, delusional disorder, and history uterine cancer. A 7/23/24 Nurse Practitioner note reveals that Resident #1 was transferred from the facility to the hospital on 7/11/24 for symptoms of a CVA (stroke). S/He was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] post CVA treatment with aphasia (speech disorder) and left sided hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-06-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident was treated in a manner that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's right to be treated with dignity and respect, and to make choices, for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #1 has diagnoses that include vascular dementia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Per an MDS (Minimum Data Set, a resident assessment tool) dated 5/20/26, Resident #1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 1 indicating severely impaired cognition (the ability to perceive, learn, remember, reason, and problem-solve). Per record review of the facility follow-up investigation report received by Survey & Certification on 5/1/26, LNA #2 felt uncomfortable assisting LNA #1 with the care of Resident #1 on 4/23/26. Resident #1 was being resistive to care being provided by LNA #1 and LNA #2. She [LNA #2] stated that when [Resident #1] was resistive to care and attempting to bite, that [LNA #1] said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an incident of alleged abuse for 1 of 3 sampled residents. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during two previous partial surveys dated 2/17/26 and 12/9/25. Findings include:Per record review, Resident #1 has diagnoses that include vascular dementia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Per an MDS (Minimum Data Set, a resident assessment tool) dated 5/20/26, Resident #1 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) score of 1 indicating severely impaired cognition (the ability to perceive, learn, remember, reason, and problem-solve). Per record review of the facility follow-up investigation report dated 5/1/26 of an allegation of abuse, LNA #2 felt uncomfortable assisting LNA #1 with the care of Resident #1 on 4/23/26. Resident #1 was being resistive to care being provided by LNA #1 and LNA #2. She [LNA #2] stated that when [Resident #1] was resistive to care and attempting to bite, that [LNA #1] said 'stop being a retard' to Resident #1. LNA #2 further stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and homelike environment for the residents who reside on 2 of 2 units. Findings include:During observations of the 2nd floor unit on 3/29/2026 at approximately 4:50 PM, multiple hallway ceiling lights were noted to have dead bugs in them. Visible from the hallway, there were dusty surfaces in resident rooms # 211 and #214 and the floor in room [ROOM NUMBER] had large pieces of food smeared across it.Per observation on 3/30/2026 at approximately 8:33 AM, the surfaces in the resident rooms #211 and #214 were still dusty, the floor in room [ROOM NUMBER] was also noted to have dust and debris on the floor, room [ROOM NUMBER]'s floor was still dirty with the food from the night before. Cobwebs were noted on the outside of the 2nd floor dining room windows, obscuring the view for residents.Per interview on 3/31/2026 at approximately 2:43 PM, the Unit Manager (UM) confirmed that surfaces in residents' room were dusty.Per interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-01 · tag F0887 — pattern
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their policy related to Covid 19 vaccination and provide evidence that five out of five sampled staff members were offered a Covid 19 vaccination and consent obtained along with three out of five sampled residents (Resident #9, Resident #43, and Resident #53). Per review of the facility policy titled Coronavirus, Prevention, and Control dated 3/5/26, it states that all residents and staff members will be educated and offered a Covid 19 vaccine unless contraindicated or full immunization has been acquired. That both the staff and resident/resident representative will be educated on the benefits and the risks of the vaccination and that a vaccine will not be administered without written informed consent.Per review of the current CDC guidelines for Covid 19 vaccination (Staying Up to Date with COVID-19 Vaccines | Covid | CDC ) it states that the effectiveness of previous Covid 19 vaccines decrease overtime and identifies getting updated vaccination as being especially important for people aged 65 and up, and those…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that a facility investigation of abuse was submitted to the state agency within the required five-day timeframe. Findings include:On 11/5/25 the State Survey Agency received an online self-report regarding allegations of staff to resident neglect/abuse for an incident that occurred on 11/3/25. The State Survey Agency did not receive a report of the facility's investigation results within 5 working days of the alleged incident. Per interview with the Administrator on 2/17/26 at approximately 1:45 PM, s/he stated the facility's investigation summary was sent to the State Survey Agency on 11/10/26 and provided an email receipt of the summary. Upon review of the email receipt, the summary was sent to an incorrect email address. The Administrator confirmed the email address used was not the correct email address to submit a facility's investigation summary.Per facility policy titled Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program, reviewed/revised 12/2025, The Administrator will provide the state survey agency, law…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents and misappropriation of resident property related to the screening of prospective employees 2 out of 5 sampled staff. Findings include: Per record review, LPN #1 [Licensed Practical Nurse] did not have any adult state background check. LPN#1 has been working at the facility since 9/15/25 without a [NAME] Adult Abuse Registry background check.Per record review LNA#1 [Licensed Nursing Assistant] did not have any [NAME] state adult background check. LNA#1 has been working at the facility since 8/13/25 without a [NAME] Adult Abuse Registry background check.Per the facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy [no revision date] states, A. Screening: 1. A background check will be conducted on all new employees and volunteers to include the following: a. A request for information about all substantiated findings from the Department for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report three allegations of abuse to the state for one of two sampled residents (Resident #3). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during a previous partial survey, dated 3/3/25. Findings include:Per record review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy p[no revision date] states, Mental and verbal abuse: Is the use of verbal and nonverbal conduct which causes or has the potential to cause the resident to experience humiliation, intimidation, fear, shame, agitation, or degradation.G. Reporting/Response Abuse Neglect and Exploitation Procedure Form-CLR 1. For any actual or suspicious act of or sign of abuse, neglect or exploitation it is the responsibility of every employee and volunteer to make sure the resident is safe first. 2. Every employee and volunteer of CLR are mandated reporters and must cause a report to be made to APS [Adult Protective Services] by reporting any actual or suspected abuse, neglect or exploitation immediately to their supervisor.Per record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-09 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate two of four sampled allegations of abuse for Resident #3. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during the previous recertification survey, dated 3/27/25. Findings include:Per record review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy [no revision date], it states, E. Investigation 1. Person witnessing the incident or receiving the alleged abuse, neglect or exploitation complaint will immediately make sure the resident is safe and then notify his/her supervisor 2. Supervisor will immediately notify the shift supervisor, who will notify the Administrator. 3. Shift supervisor will meet and discuss the complaint with the alleged victim if he/she is able, witness(s) [sic] if any, and alleged perpetrator to make a written report.1. Explain to all parties involved that an internal investigation will occur and as applicable the incident will be reported to Licensing and Protection/Adult Protective Services and there may be an external investigation by them.Per record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and staff interview, the facility failed to honor residents' choices as outlined in their care plan for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #3). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #3 has diagnoses including major depressive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, schizoaffective disorder, and borderline personality disorder. Per record review, a facility grievance dated 10/13/25 denotes that Resident #3 did not wish to have LPN #2 care for them. A progress note from 10/15/25 written by the Director of Nursing (DON) states they Spoke with resident regarding grievance against nurse. [She/he] has stated that she/he feels that a certain nurse isn't as attentive as [she/he] should be and refused to give [her/him] a popsicle that [she/he] paid for. [She/he] would prefer this nurse not care for [her/him] anymore.Facility policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive, Person-Centered, reviewed/revised 2/2025 states, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store medications appropriately on one randomly observed medication cart, potentially impacting residents on 1 of 2 units. Findings include: Per observation on 10/22/25 at 8:53 AM, an unopened Lidocaine 5% patch was found to be on top of the medication cart on the second floor. There was one resident sitting in the hallway, one resident self-propelling, and 8 residents in the dining room.Per record review of the facility's Storage of Medications policy [last revised 1/2025] states, 3. During a medication pass medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the Med storage area/cart.An interview was conducted with Licensed Nurse #1 on 10/22/25 at 8:58 AM. She confirmed she left the lidocaine patch on the top of the medication cart unsupervised stating, I was just coming out of a patient's room. The resident didn't want the patch, so I left it at the cart.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 51 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to inform in advance of the risks and benefits of the proposed care, the treatment alternatives or other options for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident #1). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during a recertification survey dated 3/27/25. Findings include:Per record review Resident #1 was admitted with physician's orders for an antidepressant, Protriptyline (Vivactil) 10 mg twice daily, and an antipsychotic medication, Aripiprazole (Abilify) 15 mg daily. A consent form for antipsychotic medications was completed on and signed by the Resident's Guardian on 8/15/2025 listing the Aripiprazole as a prescribed medication. Further record review revealed a Consent for Antidepressant Medication form which was blank, it did not list the Protriptyline, and it was not signed by the Guardian. There was no documented evidence that the facility obtained informed consent for the Protriptyline. A physician's order dated 9/13/2025 for Quetiapine (Seroquel, an antipsychotic) 600 mg daily was initiated. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the resident representative of a change in condition related to laboratory results and treatment options for one of three residents in the sample (Resident #1). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during a partial survey dated 3/3/25. Findings include:Based on record review Resident #1 had a court appointed guardian with the guardian's spouse listed as emergency contact #2 on their information sheet. A progress note dated 10/8/2025 states The nurse received a fax from the [NAME] lab of a urine culture. The nurse sent the culture results to the [Nurse Practitioner]. The Resident was evaluated by OT [occupational therapy] and determined the resident is not safe to take anything orally other than a [tablespoon] of water every so often for comfort. Based on OTs evaluation the nurse attempted to call the [guardian] to talk about the results of the culture and talk about options regarding [antibiotic] treatment. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-19 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that one of five nurses, an agency nurse in the applicable sample had received training and competencies needed to provide care for the residents who reside in the facility. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with the violation cited during a recertification survey dated 3/27/25. Findings include: Per review of 5 nurse's education and training files to determine if they had the training and skill set to perform an admission the facility was unable to locate the employee training and competency files of an agency staff nurse. Per interview with the facility Administrator on 11/4/2025 at approximately 4:00 PM the agency nurse no longer works there, and they had a recent change in the education department. The Administrator confirmed that they were not able to find the agency nurses file that consists of training and competencies required to provide care to the residents who live there.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review of facility policy, the facility failed to establish a grievance policy that contains the correct information to support the residents' rights to file a grievance for seven of the seven residents in the sample (Resident #62, #15, #51, #19, #30, #46, and #35). This has the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: A review of the Grievance /Concerns Policy & Procedure, posted in the lobby of the facility, contained information pertaining to the previous owners and named the current Administrator as the Grievance Officer, providing the wrong email address for the Administrator. A review of document Patient Concern/Grievance Policy, revised on 1/2024, reads: 1) The grievance officer is the Director of Social Services, and her name, extension, and location are posted throughout the facility. 2) If a resident/family member has a concern, they can approach /contact any facility staff member, or a resident concern form can be filled out . 6) There will be a follow-up with the residents and/or family member…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on the interview and staff education record review, the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 3 sampled licensed nursing assistants (LNAs) were assessed for the competency and skill sets needed to provide care and respond to each resident's individualized needs. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during a previous complaint survey, dated 4/16/24, and has the potential to affect all residents. Findings include: Per review of 3 LNA education records, 2 of the 3 sampled LNAs currently working at the facility did not have documentation of the competency evaluation required to demonstrate that they had the necessary skills to provide the care needed. Per interview on 3/26/24 at approximately 3:30 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) indicated that she is responsible for assessing competencies. She is currently developing a system that has not been implemented yet. Per interview with the Regional Director of Nursing on 3/26/2024 at approximately 4:59 PM, she indicated the facility does not have hard copies of employee files that were also employees of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — widespread
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that monthly pharmacist drug regimen reviews, recommendations, and attending physician responses were completed and documented in the resident record Medication Regimen Review (MRR) process for 10 of 10 Residents in the applicable sample (Residents #12, #13, #20 #22 #23# 26#29 #54 #61, and #64). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during the previous recertification survey, dated 1/10/24. Findings include: 1. Per record review Resident #54 has diagnoses that include dementia with mood disturbances. A Care Plan focus initiated on 1/19/2024 states that the Resident exhibits or has the potential to exhibit physical and verbal behaviors toward others. Per review of facility investigation reports, the Resident has had a recent history of aggressive physical behaviors toward other residents on 12/23/2024, 12/29/2024, and 1/8/2025. Review of Resident #54's Physician's orders revealed a physicians order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-03-27 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespread
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and review of employee training records, the facility failed to develop a system to document the minimum 12 hours of nurse aide training per year required to ensure the continuing competence of the LNAs ( Licensed Nursing Assistants). Findings include: Per review of the training records for 3 sampled staff members, there was no documented evidence of the 12 hours of training per year required to meet identified staff or resident needs. On 3/26/25 at approximately 3:00 PM, an LNA revealed she did not know how the facility tracked training records and relied on the facility to determine if she met the minimum standard hours. During an interview with the Regional Director of Nursing on 3/26/25 at approximately 4:55 PM, she stated the facility did not have complete access to the prior owner's employee records and had not yet developed a tracking system for current employees.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify residents and/or their representative in writing of a transfer/discharge for 3 out 3 sampled residents (Residents #14, #22, and #26). Findings include: Per facility Transfer or Discharge Policy reviewed 1/2024, The Resident and/or their representative will be notified in writing of the following information: a. Reason for transfer/discharge. b. Effective date of transfer/discharge. c. The location to which the resident is being transferred/discharged d. A statement of the resident's right to appeal the transfer/discharge e. The facility bed hold policy f. The name, address, and telephone number of the Office of the State Long-term Care Ombudsman Record review shows that Resident #14 was hospitalized on [DATE]. There is no record that a transfer/discharge notice was provided to the resident and/or their representative. Record review shows that Resident #22 was hospitalized on [DATE], 6/24/24, 9/9/24, and 7/25/24. There is no record that a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify residents and/or their representative in writing of the bed-hold and returns policy for 3 out 3 sampled residents (Residents #14, #22, and #26). Findings include: Per facility Bed-holds and Returns Policy, reviewed 1/2024, Prior to transfers and therapeutic leaves, residents or resident representatives will be informed in writing of the bed-hold and return policy. 1. Record review shows that Resident #14 was hospitalized on [DATE]. There is no record that a Bed-hold Notice was provided to the resident and/or their representative. On 3/25/25, at 3:34 PM, this was confirmed by the facility Administrator. 2. Record review shows that Resident #22 was hospitalized on [DATE], 9/9/24, and 7/25/24. There is no record that a Bed-hold Notice was provided to the resident and/or their representative. On 3/26/25, at 9:03 AM, this was confirmed by the Regional Director of Nursing. 3. Record review shows that Resident #26 was hospitalized on [DATE] and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0699 — pattern
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents are effectively assessed for past trauma experiences and address the needs of trauma survivors by identifying and minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization and developing an idevidualized care plan related to trauma for 4 of 4 residents in the applicable sample (Resident #22, #26, #28, and #51). Findings include: 1. During an interview with Resident #51 on 3/25/25 (date) at 10:31 AM s/he stated that she has had several traumatizing events throughout her/his life. These events include multiple sexual assaults and two fetal abortions, one with and one without consent. Per record review a Psychosocial Evaluation completed by the consultant Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LICSW) on 5/13/2024 Resident #51 has a history of trauma, anxiety, and SI (suicidal ideation). The Resident discussed severadl past traumatic events that occured throughout her/his life and the impact that they have had on them. A Comprehensive Trauma Screening completed as part of the 5/13/2024 Psychosocial Evaluation states: Section…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, and record review the physician failed to ensure that the onsite review of the resident's total program of care included necessary lab testing, treatment, and medication orders for 3 of 27 residents sampled (Resident #13, #26, and Resident #322). Findings include: 1). Per record review Resident #322 was admitted on [DATE] after an acute hospital stay related to a fractured right hip repaired on 3/13/25. Per his/her discharge summary/orders written by sending Physician on 3/20/25, Resident #322 was being admitted to rehabilitation therapy, and pain control. Per further review of his/her discharge summary, s/he had been receiving oral dilaudid for pain 4 times a day in addition to acetaminophen for pain. S/he was also experiencing constipation and was ordered to continue receiving medications to treat the symptoms. Resident #322 was also noted to have swelling in his/her right hip after surgery and was being treated with aspirin 81 mg for prevention of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 2 out of 10 applicable residents (Resident #20, #23) remained free from unnecessary medications. Findings include: 1). Per record review, Resident #23 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] status post fractured hip with surgical repair, and a history of Alzheimer's dementia. Resident #23 had the following medication orders written by the Provider on 3/14/25: Oxycodone 2.5 mg every 4 hours as needed for hip fracture post-op pain, start 3/14/25 with no evidence of stop date. Morphine 0.5 mls every 2 hours as needed for Hip fracture; post -op pain; Comfort measures, with no evidence of a stop date. A record review indicates a note entered by the Consulting Pharmacist on 3/13/25 indicating the submission of a New admission Medication Regime Review (MMR) with the following recommendations: Currently receiving Oxycodone PRN (as needed) without a stop date. Please evaluate the duration of therapy. Consider adding a stop date of 14 days, if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-27 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications for 5 of 10 Residents in the sample (Resident #12, #20, #29, #54, and #61). The facility also failed to implement 14 day stop dates on prescribed as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications for 3 of the 5 residents in the sample (Residents #12, #20, #54). Findings include: 1. Per record review Resident #54 has diagnoses that include dementia with mood disturbances. Review of the Resident's Care Plan reflects that s/he was admitted to Hospice services on 8/7/2024 due to the diagnosis of congestive heart failure. A Care Plan focus initiated on 1/19/2024 states that the Resident exhibits or has the potential to exhibit physical and verbal behaviors toward others. Per review of facility investigation reports, the Resident has had a recent history of aggressive physical behaviors toward other residents on 12/23/2024, 12/29/2024, and 1/8/2025. During meal observations on 3/24/2025 at 12:40 PM and 3/25/2025 at 12:15 PM, Resident #54 was observed sitting in a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean kitchen environment, which has the potential to impact all residents in the facility. Findings include: On 3/24/25, at 10:24 AM, it was observed that shelves under the main cooking counter/steam table were very dirty with dried food and crumbs. Clean pots and pans were stacked directly on the dirty shelves. Other shelves around the kitchen had dirty, food-stained paper under clean pans, cups and kitchen tools. The dietary manager confirmed shelves were not clean at this time. On 3/25/25, at 11:34 AM, in the first-floor kitchenette, a staff member picked up the ice scoop from inside the ice chest with bare hands and put the scoop back into the ice chest. This surveyor noted that the ice scoop was directly on the ice, with the handle touching the ice. There was a container on the counter to store the ice scoop. It was empty. On 3/25/25, at 12:15 PM, the ice scoop was still inside the ice chest. At this time, a Dietary Aide confirmed that the ice scoop should not be stored inside the ice chest, but rather in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-27 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure that the binding arbitration agreement was explained in a form or manner the resident or resident's representative acknowledges that he/she understands for 2 out of 3 residents sampled, (Resident #31 and Resident #43). Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #43's Minimal Data Set (MDS) states that he/she had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) done on 3/11/25, with a score of 8, indicating that he/she is moderately cognitively impaired. Resident #43's representative, a sibling, signed this resident's Arbitration Agreement on 3/8/25. During an interview on 3/27/25, at 10:38 AM, Resident #43's representative stated They (the facility) emailed me a bunch of paperwork to sign but never explained it. I live in another state and work full time. They told me it was just routine admission paperwork that needed to be signed so [Resident #43] could be admitted He/she did not realize what arbitration was. He/she stated he/she would not have signed an arbitration agreement if he/she knew what it meant. 2. Per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the 1 of 27 residents in the sample (Resident #23) or his/her representative was informed in advance, by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment alternatives or treatment options, and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers. Findings include: Per record review, Resident #23 has a diagnosis of Alzheimer's and is no longer able to make his/her own medical decisions. S/he was recently treated for a fractured hip, that was surgically repaired on 3/6/25. Resident #23 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #23 has a Power of Attorney (POA) who makes his/her medical decisions. The following orders were written by the Physician on 3/14/25 Morphine Sulfate (concentrate) oral solution 20 mg/ml, give 0.5 milliliters (mls) by mouth every 2 hours as needed for hip fracture, post op pain; Comfort measures. Per interview with Resident #23's Representative on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to assure that further potential abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment did not occur after an allegation of abuse for 1 resident [Resident #324] of one sampled resident regarding abuse allegations. Findings include: Per interview with Resident #324 on 3/24/25 at 1:25 PM, Resident #324 stated that Licensed Nurse #1 was withholding his/her pain medication as well as not treating his/her wounds and had inserted a silicone catheter when the resident had a potential allergy to silicone. Resident #324 was interviewed on 3/26/25 at 12:10 PM. Resident #324 stated s/he reported it to other nurses and Licensed Nurse #1 was moved to a different unit. However, the next day the nurse was seen outside his/her door and on the unit. Resident #324 stated s/he felt intimidated. Per interview with the Administrator on 3/24/25 at 2:13 PM, the Administrator stated s/he filed the concerns in a grievance. The Administrator confirmed that Licensed Nurse #1 was working…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain accurate physician orders to provide necessary care and services on admission for 1 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #322). Findings include: 1). Per record review, Resident #322 was admitted on [DATE] after acute hospitalization, related to a fractured right hip, that was repaired on 3/13/25. Per his/her discharge summary and orders written by the hospital Physician on 3/20/25, Resident #322 was being admitted to rehabilitation for therapy, and pain control. Per further review of the discharge summary, Resident #322 had been receiving oral dilaudid for pain 4 times a day in addition to acetaminophen. Resident #322 was also noted to have swelling in his/her right hip after surgery and was being treated with aspirin 81 mg for prevention of deep vein thrombosis as recommended by a orthopedic surgeon. Per the discharge instructions the aspirin was to continue until 4/13/25. Per review of Resident #322's Discharge summary dated [DATE] s/he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-27 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain management was provided for 1 of 27 sampled residents (Resident #28). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during a previous complaint survey, dated 10/18/24. Findings include: Per the record review, the staff failed to ensure adequate pain control and administer pain medications per provider orders for Resident #28. During the survey, the Resident was observed calling out in pain on multiple occasions. Per record review of Resident #28's care plan, s/he entered hospice care on 3/29/2024 due to end stage diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD; irreversible lung and airway damage that obstructs airways). Per interview with the resident on 3/25/2025 at approximately 12:30 PM, Resident # 28 indicated pain almost every day, particularly in between scheduled pain medications. Per observation on 3/25/2025 at 1:00 PM and on 3/26/2025 at 2:00 PM and 2:29 PM, Resident # 28 was heard from the hall, calling out in pain. A review of the MAR (Medication Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medication error rates were not 5% or greater. The total error rate for all observations was calculated at 12%. There were 25 observations and three medication errors. Findings include: Per observation of LPN #1 on 3/25/25 at 10:12 AM, LPN #1 administered Resident #50 one Omeprazole Oral Tablet Delayed Release 20 mg [milligram] tablet (a medication used for acid reflux), 2 puffs of Dulera Inhalation Aerosol 100-5 MCG/ACT [micrograms per actuation] (a medication used to treat asthma), and 31 units of Basaglar KwikPen Subcutaneous Solution Pen injector 100 units/mL [units per milliliter] (insulin used to treat high blood sugar) for a blood glucose reading of 333. Per record review of Resident #50's MAR [Medication Administration Record] for March 2025, the Omeprazole was due to be administered at 7:00 AM. The insulin and Dulera inhaler were due to be administered at 9:00 AM. Per record review of the facility's Administering Medications policy [last reviewed/revised 2/25/25] states, 4. Medications must be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-27 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly provide routine and emergency dental services to meet the residents' needs related to dental pain for one of 16 residents in the applicable sample (Resident #61). Findings include: An interview was conducted with Resident #61 on 3/24/25 at 11:56 AM. Resident #61 discussed that s/he has not seen a dentist since being at the facility since 8/7/24. S/he stated s/he was having dental pain. Per interview with Resident #61 on 3/26/25 at 10:25 AM, s/he stated s/he was in 10 out of 10 pain at times due to upper and lower right dental pain. Resident #61 stated, I have a lot of teeth that need to be pulled .I feel like I don't matter and that my health isn't being taken care of. Per record review of the facility's Dental Services policy [no last revised\reviewed date] states, Centers will provide or obtain an outside resource routine and emergency dental services, including 24-hour emergency dental care, to meet the needs of each patient .When necessary or if requested, Center staff will assist the patient in making dental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that there was sufficient staff to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual plans of care and considering the number, acuity, and diagnoses of the facility's resident population. This deficient practice had the potential to impact all residents who reside in the facility. This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during a partial survey, dated 4/16/24. Findings include: 1. During an interview with the Director of Nursing on 1/22/2025 at 12:03 PM, he stated that he is often working the medication cart due to short staff. Per interview with the designated Infection Preventionist, she was not able to complete training or follow up with the COVID-19 outbreak mitigation plan due to being out with COVID-19 and also working as a staff nurse. See F882 for more information. During an interview on 1/23/25 at 5:48 PM with the facility Administrator, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors for 2 of 3 residents in the applicable sample (Resident #10 and #11). Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #10 tested positive for COVID-19 on 1/10/2025. A Physician's order dated 1/10/2025 states Paxlovid (300/100) Oral Tablet Therapy Pack 20 x 150 MG & 10 x 100 MG (Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir) Give 3 tablet by mouth two times a day for COVID-19 treatment for 5 Days until finished . Review of Resident #10's Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed that the start date was to be 1/10/2025 at 9:00 PM and end date on 1/15/2025 for a total of 10 doses. The MAR reflects that the first dose of Paxlovid was not administered until 1/13/2025 at 9:00 PM. The MAR revealed that Resident #10 only received 4 doses of the Paxlovid between 1/13/2025 - 1/15/2025. Review of the Order Audit Report confirms that the Paxlovid was not dispensed by the pharmacy until 1/13/2025. Further review of Resident #10's revealed a Physician's order with a start date of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that resident's medical records contained nurse progress notes, complete and accurate assessments, and wound care consultant notes to provide a picture of the resident's progress, including his/her response to treatments and/or services, and changes in his/her condition for 2 of 15 sampled residents (Resident #9 and #7). This is a repeat deficiency for this facility, with violations cited during a partial survey, dated 6/12/24, and the previous recertification surveys, dated 1/10/24. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility policy titled Charting and Documentation, The Policy Statement says All services provided to the residents, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical. functional or psychological condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care. Review of the facility policy titled Wound Care last…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of resident to resident abuse was reported to the State Licensing Agency for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #4) within 2 hours of the incident and failed to submit an investigation of the findings to the State Agency within 5 days. Findings include: A facility investigation submitted to the State Agency on 1/9/25 of an allegation of physical abuse related to a resident-to-resident altercation that occurred on 1/8/25 at approximately 5:12 PM, revealed that Resident #1 entered the room of Resident #4 and threw a can of soda at his/her arm causing a skin tear to the left forearm, and a bruise to his/her forehead Per nursing documentation and risk management notes there is no evidence of how the bruise occurred to Resident #4's forehead. The facility failed to report the incident to the State Agency within 2 hours of the occurrence. According to the State Agency the facility filed the report on 1/9/25 at 4:30 PM, over 23 hours after the facility was aware of the allegation, and the 5 day…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise the care plan for 1 of 15 residents in the sample (Resident #4) related to resident to resident physical abuse and wounds. Findings include: A facility investigation submitted to the State Agency on 1/9/25 of an allegation of physical abuse related to a resident-to-resident altercation that occurred on 1/8/25 revealed that Resident #1 entered the room of Resident #4 and threw a can of soda at his/her arm causing a skin tear to the left forearm and a bruise to his/her forehead. Review of Resident #4's care plan reveals there is no documented evidence that the facility revised the care plan to add interventions to monitor Resident #4 for complications related to resident to resident physical abuse resulting in injury. See F689 for more information. Per interview on 1/22/25 at approximately 10:00 AM with Resident #4 stated that s/he is afraid to sleep because [s/he] is worried that [Resident #1] will come back in [his/her] room. Per Resident #4's care plan dated on 6/27/24 [Resident #4] is at risk for skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide quality care to 1 out of 15 residents in the sample (Resident #4) related to wound care that is not pressure. Findings include: Per observation on 1/23/25 at approximately 10:00 AM, Resident #4 had a dressing on his/her left forearm dated 1/17/25. Per interview with Resident #4 at that time s/he stated that s/he had an injury to his/her left arm and that the nurses had placed a dressing to the area. Resident #4 further stated that a nurse had not changed the dressing in several days and pointed to the date on the bandage which was dated on 1/17/25. Review of the facility policy titled Wound Care last reviewed/revised in 1/2024 states the following information should be recorded in the resident's medical record 1. The type of wound care given. 2. The date and time the wound care was given. 3. The position in which the resident was placed. 4. The name and title of the individual performing the wound care. 5. Any changes in the resident's condition. 6. All assessment date (i.e., wound bed color, size…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents in the sample were free from physical abuse (Resident #3). Findings include: Per record review a Nursing Note for Resident #3 dated 10/31/2024 reads This RN (Registered Nurse) was called to the dining room on dementia unit by an LNA [license nursing assistant]. Who stated that [S/he] witnessed [Res #1] put [his/her] hands on another residents [Res #3] neck. While the resident was sitting at the table causing the resident to yell out. Per the facility investigation summary dated 10/31/2024 Staff reported that resident [Res #3] stuck [his/her] tongue out at the resident [Res #1]. [Res #1] then put [his/her] hands around [Res #3] neck . Review of the facility investigation confirmed that the altercation between Residents #1 and #3 did occur and was witnessed on 10/31/2024. Per interview with the Administrator on 11/19/2024 at approximately 10:00 AM the following interventions were implemented on 10/31/2024. The facility Identified all residents at risk on the 2nd floor for abuse, initiated a 1:1 for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Per interview and record review the facility failed to revise the comprehensive care plan related to a resident elopement from the facility for one sampled resident [Res.#1]. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #1 reveals h/she is a [AGE] year-old admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include alcohol abuse, vascular dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety. An interview was conducted on 6/12/24 at 12:48 PM with Resident #1's assigned Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] during events on 5/25/24. The LPN stated on the morning of 5/25/24, Resident #1 had the wander guard present, and had triggered the alarm, then exited the building. The LPN stated that staff observed via the camera that Resident # 1 was outside and s/he was just sitting there. The LPN reported later We didn't realize [s/he] had left. We were in the process of searching for [h/her] for approximately 30 minutes when police called and reported picking up the resident. Per record review, on 5/25/24 at 9:28 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide a discharge plan for a resident who attempted to leave against medical advice for 1 sampled resident [Resident #1]. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #1 reveals the resident is a [AGE] year-old admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that include alcohol abuse, vascular dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, along with difficulty in walking, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and a history of falling. Review of the facility's Discharge Against Medical Advice [AMA] policy includes: If the patient continues to insist on discharge AMA and refuses a safe planned discharge: A Discharge Transition Plan will be provided to the patient or patient representative. Per further record review and confirmed during interviews with Resident #1 Unit Manager [UM], the Director of Nursing (DON) and the Administrator, there is no documentation that a Discharge Transition Plan was created for Resident #1 or that Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives adequate supervision to maintain safety and prevent accidents regarding elopement and leaving the facility Against Medical Advice for 1 sampled resident [Res.#1]. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Res.#1 reveals the resident is a [AGE] year-old admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include alcohol abuse, vascular dementia, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, along with difficulty in walking, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and a history of falling. Interviews with staff familiar with Res.#1 were conducted on 6/12/24. Staff, the Director of Nursing [DON] and the facility's Administrator [ADM] described the resident as cognitively delayed and has a dementia diagnosis, stating the resident .is tricky. My first impression is this [person] is out of [h/her] mind .some of the things [s/he] says are not realistic. The ADM reported I talk to [h/her] every day. [S/he]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that are complete and accurately documented for 1 sampled resident [Res.#1]. Findings include: Per review of the [NAME] Police Report to Adult Protective Services- Intake Report #0016 -5/25/24 9:45 AM: On 05/25/2024 I was on duty as a Police Officer in the town of [NAME]. I was called to a report of an elderly [person] walking on [NAME] Rd. It was later found to be the victim [Res.#1] who had left the [NAME] Health and Rehab facility without their knowledge. The victim made comments that [s/he] was going to walk to [NAME], which is approximately 37 miles away .It should also be noted the victim did not know which town [s/he] was currently in. An interview was conducted on 6/12/24 with Res.#1's Licensed Practical Nurse [LPN] from 5/25/24. The LPN stated We didn't realize [s/he] had left. We were in the process of searching for [h/her] for approximately 30 minutes when police called reporting picking up the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that there are a sufficient number of skilled nurse aides to provide care and services to attain the highest practicable well-being for each resident and in accordance with each resident's plan of care. Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] following surgical intervention for diverticulitis (a chronic issue with the intestines) that resulted in a colostomy (when the intestines exit through a hole in the abdomen). As a result of this, Resident #2 receives all their care in bed. Per review of the care plan, Resident #2 requires substantial to total assist in bed for toileting, incontinence care, bathing, and grooming/hygiene. The care plan also states that Resident #2 is incontinent of urine. Per interview on 4/16/24 at approximately 9:30 AM, Resident #2 stated that they have had to wait hours on several occasions in order to have their urine-soaked brief changed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-16 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that licensed nurses have the specific competencies necessary to care for Residents' needs as identified through resident assessments and the plan of care. Findings include: Per record review, Residents #1 and #2 both had colostomies while admitted to the facility. A colostomy is when the intestines are surgically diverted to exit out of an incision in the abdomen. Stool is then collected in a bag that must be emptied periodically. The bag must also be changed periodically. Per interview on 4/16/24 at approximately 11:00 AM, the facility Nurse Educator stated that they were not sure if ostomy care was part of the annual competencies that nurses have to complete, or if the competencies are completed as needed based on the current patient population. The facility Wound Nurse stated that they have shown some of the nurses who provided ostomy care to Residents #1 and #2 how to do it, but that they have not completed a competency checklist for each nurse for ostomy care that outlines the facility's procedure for ostomy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-16 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — pattern
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Residents with colostomies receive care and services consistent with professional standards of practice and the comprehensive care plan for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents #1 and #2). Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Diverticulitis (a chronic condition of the intestines), Failure to Thrive, and Colostomy Status (a colostomy is when the intestines are surgically diverted to exit out of an incision in the abdomen). Per review of a provider admission note entered on 4/5/24, the note states, Patient had recent colon resection for bowel obstruction approximately 2 and half weeks ago. [They were] sent back to the ER after having acute abdominal pain and having inability to care for [themselves]. Resident #1 was discharged to the hospital on 4/10/24 and did not return. Per further record review, Resident #1 was never ordered for any colostomy care, including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0557 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to treat the resident with respect and dignity and failed to provide an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, recognizing each resident's individuality for 1 of 5 (Resident # 334). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #334 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: spinal stenosis, rheumatoid arthritis, morbid obesity, and end-stage renal disease. An activities of daily living (ADL) care plan initiated on 12/29/23 reflects that the resident requires assistance/is dependent for ADL care related to limited mobility. Her/his Brief Interview for Mental Status ( BIMS) score is 15, suggesting that s/he is cognitively intact. Per interview on 1/9/2024 at 8:30 AM, Resident # 334 indicated s/he had back pain and painful joints due to their arthritis, making it challenging to move around and care for her/him self. S/he feels limited in mobility and thinks that the Licensed Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a Resident's choice regarding life sustaining treatment was updated on their COLST (clinician's order or orders for treatment or limitation of treatment such as intubation (insertion of a tube through a person's mouth or nose, then down into their trachea to open the airway and allow passage of air), mechanical ventilation (a machine that takes over the work of breathing when a person is unable to breath on their own), transfer to hospital, antibiotics, artificially administered nutrition, or other medical intervention) for one of 23 residents (resident #9). Per record review Resident #9 has a COLST that was signed on 12/13/2022 that reflects that Resident #9 would want a trial course in intubation and ventilation treatment if s/he were in respiratory distress. On 10/27/24 Resident #9 requested a change to their COLST to remove their previous choice to trial intubation and ventilation. A care plan meeting note written on 10/27/2023 that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for 1 resident [Res.#40] of 32 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of Res.#40's Care Plan reveals the resident is assessed as exhibits or has the potential to exhibit physical behaviors such as hitting and banging the wall, rearranging furniture, related to: Cognitive Loss/Dementia with psychotic features and primary open-angle glaucoma, bilateral, severe stage [damage to the Optic nerve that leads to vision loss]. Care Plan interventions for this include Have minimal decorations in resident's room due to resident behavior/glaucoma along with Facility will secure dresser to the wall [marked as Resolved on 1/2/24]. Per observation of Res.#40's room on 1/8/24, the room contained a single bed, a chair, and a nightstand located across the room from the bed with 4 books stored on a shelf below the nightstand drawer. There was no dresser in the room. The walls in the room were bare, with no artwork, posters, personal items, or activity calendar. There was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan related to the communication needs of one hearing impaired resident (Resident #6) in the sample. Findings include: During interview with Resident #6 on 1/9/24 at 10:10 AM s/he stated loudly I can't hear you. When asked if s/he had hearing aids, Resident #6 stated I don't read lips. Resident #6 smiled, shrugged her/his shoulders, and shook her/his head. Per record review Resident #6 was admitted to the facility with a significant hearing impairment. Activities care plan initiated by the Director of Recreation on 10/16/23 states would benefit from accommodation for hearing loss by using communication board, placement near speaker/leader, use of amplifiers/headphones and written instructions/gestures. On 1/10/24 the care plan was updated to reflect impaired communication as evidenced by impaired hearing. Intervention included Ensure that resident has [his/her] hearing aids in ears during day time hours, as [s/he] allows. Speak in normal tone voice clearly and slowly. Reduce…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based upon observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate activities per the resident's plan of care for 1 resident [Res. #40] of 32 sampled residents. Findings include: Per review of Res.#40's medical record, the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that include Glaucoma [damage to the Optic nerve that leads to vision loss] and Adjustment Disorder with Depressed Mood. Per observation, the resident resides in a room by themselves with a single bed and no roommate. Review of Res.#40's Care Plan reveals the resident is assessed as While in the facility, [Res.#40] states that it is important that [they] have the opportunity to engage in daily routines that are meaningful relative to [their] preferences, with the Care Plan Goal that the resident should attend/participate in activities of choice 3 times weekly. Care Plan interventions include I enjoy listening to music and prefer country, 60's, 70's, 80's on the radio, CD player, and live entertainment, I keep up with the news by discussions with another person, group discussions and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that irregularities noted during monthly pharmacist medication regimen reviews are documented in a written report for one of 5 sampled Residents (Resident #5). The facility also failed to ensure that the attending physician reviewing the report documents a rationale for not changing the medication according to the pharmacist's recommendations for one of 5 sampled Residents (Resident #5). Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #5's medication regimen was reviewed by the pharmacist on 2/1/2023. The Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review note states Comment/recommendations noted - see report. Per review of pharmacist recommendation reports for Resident #5, no report for February of 2023 could be located. 2. Per record review, the pharmacist recommended an increase in Resident #5's Basal Insulin order on 12/1/2023 through the pharmacist recommendation report. The attending physician marked disagree on the report and signed it. Per review of the record, no documented rationale could be found as to why the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who use psychotropic drugs receive gradual dose reductions, unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue the drugs for one of 5 sampled residents (Resident #5). Findings include: Per record review, Resident #5 receives the following psychotropic medications: - Clonazepam (an antianxiety medication) 1mg three times a day - Trazodone (an antidepressant) 50mg before bed - Duloxetine (an antidepressant) 120mg once a day - Latuda (an antipsychotic) 60 mg in the morning and 20mg at bedtime - Divalproex Sodium (an anticonvulsant used to treat mood disorders) 25 mg once a day Resident #5 has been on all of these psychotropic medications for over a year. The doses of these medications have either remained the same or have increased over the last year. There is no evidence in Resident #5's record to indicate that the physician has attempted a gradual dose reduction for any of these medications. There is also no documentation from the physician explaining why a gradual dose reduction of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that required documentation and medical records are readily accessible. Findings include: 1. Per observation on 1/8/24 at approximately 2:15 PM, Resident #32's toenails were very long, extending approximately 1/3-1/2 inch out from the top of their toes. One of Resident #32's middle toes had grown down and around the top of the toe. Resident #32 stated that this toe was painful. Per record review, a podiatry request for nail care had been ordered in May of 2023, to be addressed during the Podiatrist's scheduled June 2023 visit to the facility. There are no records to confirm that Resident #32 had been seen that June or at any point after June up until the present. Per interview on 1/10/24 at approximately 12:00 PM, the Market Clinical Lead confirmed that no records could be located to indicate that Resident #32's toenails had been cut in June of 2023 or any point thereafter, though they believed that evaluations did take place. They confirmed that the records were not currently accessible in the facility and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents have a clean and comfortable environment as evidenced by a dirty and unsanitary resident environment. Findings include: Unit observations and interviews occurring on 12/20/23 between approximately 9:00 AM and 9:30 AM on both resident care units with the following findings: -The floor in room [ROOM NUMBER] had multiple, large drops of a sticky substance where dried dirt had been tracked in by shoes and stuck to the floor. There were also many muddy footprints that had dried on the floor (the most recent muddy day in the location of the facility was two days prior). -The floor in room [ROOM NUMBER] had multiple dried, muddy footprints and old stains of a colored liquid. The bathroom toilet had an over-toilet commode that was caked in layers of creams and powders. The toilet bowl had large, dried feces splatters and mold growing in the bowl below the water line. At this time, the Resident in Bed #2 stated that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that care plans were reviewed by the interdisciplinary team within 7 days after completion of the comprehensive assessment for two of three sampled residents (Resident #1 and #2). Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Per Minimum Data Set (MDS) records, comprehensive assessments were performed for Resident #1 on 5/10/23, 8/10/23, and 10/11/23. Records of care plan revision history show that the care plan was created on 5/16/23 and reviewed on 8/18/23 and 10/19/23. Per review of care plan meeting progress notes, a care plan meeting took place on 5/11/23 and consisted of members of the interdisciplinary team, including Resident #1 and their family. There are no other progress notes to date documenting any interdisciplinary team meetings to discuss reviewing/revising the care plan for Resident #1. Per interview on 12/20/23 at approximately 2:00 PM, the Administrator confirmed that no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a system for reporting and controlling communicable diseases as evidenced by insufficient reporting of new COVID-19 cases and insufficient transmission-based precautions for the care of residents with COVID-19. Findings include: 1. Per review of the facility-provided line list [a tool that tracks positive test results for staff and residents] for all positive COVID-19 staff and residents, 8 residents and 4 staff members had tested positive during the facility's COVID-19 outbreak at the time of investigation. The first positive case was discovered on 8/31/23 and the most recent case was discovered on 9/8/23. Per interview on 9/11/23 at approximately 10:00 AM, the [NAME] Department of Health Epidemiologist assigned to assist in the management of the facility's COVID-19 outbreak confirmed that, as of that time, the facility had only made them aware of 6 residents and 3 staff members who tested positive as part of this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-01-10 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based upon observation and interview, the facility failed to post nurse staffing data on a daily basis in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors as required by federal regulation. Findings include: Per observation on Monday, 1/8/24 at 10:24 AM, nurse staffing data dated Friday, 1/5/24 was posted in the facility lobby where all staff, residents, and visitors enter the building. Per interview with the facility's Marketing Operations Advisor, the Advisor confirmed the nurse staff posting observed on 1/8/24 was out of date and did not accurately reflect the facility staffing.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-01-10 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the individual who has completed the specialized training in infection prevention and control oversees the facility's infection prevention and control program. Findings include: Per interview on 1/8/24 at approximately 10:30 AM, the DON (Director of Nursing) stated that the former IP (Infection Preventionist) was Nurse 1, who has since transitioned to work full time as the facility's wound nurse. While Nurse 1 is still kept up to date on the goings-on of the IPCP (infection prevention and control program), they are no longer overseeing the IPCP. The DON stated that they are taking primary accountability of ensuring all delegated IPCP tasks are being completed, along with the Administrator. The DON confirmed that they have not completed their specialized infection prevention and control training at this time. Per interview on 1/10/24 at approximately 4:30 PM, the Market Clinical Lead confirmed that while Nurse 1 has completed the specialized infection prevention and control training and was previously the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2024-01-10 · tag F0887 — widespread
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based upon interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation related to staff COVID-19 vaccination that includes at a minimum, the following: (A) That staff were provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with COVID-19 vaccine; (B) Staff were offered the COVID-19 vaccine or information on obtaining COVID-19 vaccine; and (C) The COVID-19 vaccine status of staff and related information as indicated by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). Findings include: During the facility's Recertification Survey conducted 1/8 - 1/10/24, the facility was asked to provide documentation related to staff COVID-19 vaccination as required by Long Term Care federal regulations. Per interview with the facility's Marketing Operations Advisor on 1/9/24 at 5:13 PM, the facility did not have any of the required documentation.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2023-12-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to make information on how to file a grievance available to residents as evidenced by a lack of posted procedures on resident units. Findings include: Per observation on 12/20/23 at approximately 9:30 AM, neither of the resident care units had prominently posted signage to inform residents on the facility's process for filing a grievance with the grievance official. Shortly after this initial observation, findings were shared with the Clinical Lead. A joint observation confirmed that neither resident care unit had posted signage detailing the procedure on how residents or representatives can file a grievance with the facility. The Clinical Lead confirmed that the proper signage had not been posted. Per review of the facility's policy titled Grievance/Concern, the policy states, A description of the procedure for voicing grievances/concerns will be on each unit in a prominent location.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-12-21 · tag F0712 — pattern
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents are seen by a physician once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission and at least once every 60 days thereafter, with non-physician practitioners providing no more than every other required visit after the initial visit for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1 and #2). Findings include: 1. Per record review, Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE]. Per a provider progress note from 5/8/23, Resident #1's initial provider visit was performed by the facility's Nurse Practitioner employed at that time. The following provider visits were performed on 6/15/23, 7/6/23, and 8/7/23 by the same Nurse Practitioner, per progress notes. Following this, there are no provider visits documented that include a review of Resident #1's total program of care until 12/8/23. The provider visit documented in progress notes on 12/8/23 is completed by a physician, but not Resident #1's Attending Physician on file in their record at the time…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$354,247 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $253,692 — penalty dated 2025-03-03
  • $100,555 — penalty dated 2024-10-18
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-28 for 110 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
AHS VT OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 12/18/2024
AHS VT TOPCO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/18/2024
KURLAND, BENJAMINIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 12/18/2024
KURLAND, NAOMIIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/18/2024
ALLAIRE HEALTH SERVICESOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/18/2024
BRAND SONNENSCHINE LLPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/14/2025
CIBC BANK USAOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/14/2025
CLR CONSULTING INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/14/2025
REVV STAFFINGOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/14/2025
BRECHER, CHAIMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/18/2024
SCANLON, KELLYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/18/2024
STEINBRECHER, BARBARAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2025
105 CHESTER ROAD PROPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/18/2024
AHS VT PROPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/18/2024
CAREER STAFF UNLIMITEDOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/18/2024
DIGACORE CONSULTINGOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/18/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.1M
Related-party expense51% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 10%Other / private 11%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 51% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$347per resident / day
operating cost
$10,550per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$343per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VT

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Vermont Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Vermont
$14,113/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,528/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,597/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 475025. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next