The Villa Rehab

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 114 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 30 beds and averages 22.2 residents a day — about 74% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.08 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.34 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.21 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.45 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.64 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents sampled was provided with adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents (Resident #1), by failing to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of interventions or revise care plan interventions after falls occurred. As a result, Resident #1 suffered a fall and sustained significant fractures in both ankles. This is a repeat deficiency with the violation cited during a previous complaint survey dated 7/30/25. Findings include:Per record review, Resident #1 is assessed as having cognitive impairment, with diagnoses which include Alzheimer's Disease, osteoarthritis of the knee and muscle weakness. Resident #1 is dependent on staff for activities of daily living and hygiene and requires a mechanical lift for transfers. Per record review of a Fall Risk Evaluation on 12/30/25 scores the resident as an 11 out of 32 and is at risk for falls. Per record review of a Fall Risk Evaluation on 1/13/26 scores the resident as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) from verbal abuse by a Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA). Findings include:Per interview on 5/26/26 at 12:48 PM with a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), she reported that she was the nurse on duty on 2/16/26 at approximately 1 to 2 AM, who witnessed and reported an LNA for abuse against Resident #1. The LPN stated that the LNA came up close to her when she was at the med cart and cursed saying that the LPN better go get Resident #1 and then cursed again stating Resident #1 had just urinated in their face. The LPN then walked into Resident #1's room and saw that s/he was standing there naked, with urine on the floor, and that s/he looked terrified. The LPN reported that while assisting Resident #1 with care, the LNA then came in the room and cursed at Resident #1 about how s/he urinated in the LNA's face.Per record review of Resident #1's progress notes, there is a note titled Incident Note dated 2/17/26 that states that an LNA went into Resident #1's room and cursed at the resident about…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-26 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to submit their five-day investigative report to the Division of Licensing and Protection within the allotted time. Findings include:Per interview on 5/26/26 at 12:48 PM with a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), she reported that she was the nurse on duty on 2/16/26 at approximately 1 to 2 AM, who witnessed and reported a Licensed Nursing Assistant (LNA) for abuse against Resident #1. The LPN stated that the LNA came up close to her when she was at the med cart and cursed saying that the LPN better go get Resident #1 and then cursed again stating Resident #1 had just urinated in their face. The LPN then walked into Resident #1's room and saw that s/he was standing there naked, with urine on the floor, and that s/he looked terrified. The LPN reported that while assisting Resident #1 with care, the LNA then came in the room and cursed at Resident #1 about how s/he urinated in the LNA's face. Refer to F600 for more information.Per interview on 5/26/26 at 1:18 PM with the Director of Nursing and Administrator, the Administrator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure care plans were updated with interventions after recurrent falls for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2). Findings include:1.Per review of Resident #1's care plan dated 10/17/24 and revised 2/12/26, it states, [Resident #1] is at risk for falls related to decreased mobility, pain issues and cognitive deficits, and recent falls. Most recent fall with several fractures in [his/her] bilateral lower extremities.Per review of a provider's note dated 1/16/26, it states, Primary Chief Complaint: Fall without injury. Nurse called to report a fall without injury. Pt [Patient] was attempting to self-transfer when they lost their balance and fell onto the ground. Negative LOC [Loss of Consciousness] . The resident's care plan read, 1/16/25: fall out of [his/her] wheelchair in [his/her] bedroom.Will monitor closely.Per review of a health status note dated 2/5/26, it states, This writer heard a thud from the nurses' station at 0045. Upon entering the room, found [Resident #1] sitting on the floor in front of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-30 · tag F0628 — widespread
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system to ensure transfer notices and ombudsman notices were provided for 2 of 2 sampled residents transferred to the hospital. This has the potential to impact all residents. Findings include: 1.) Per record review, Resident #16 was admitted to the facility after a stay at the hospital for treatment of a stroke. A progress note dated 7/12/2025 reveals that Resident #16 was transferred to the hospital for evaluation of altered mental status. There is no evidence in the Resident's medical record that a bed hold, or transfer/discharge notice was provided to the Resident or their family member. Per a progress note dated 7/19/2025, Resident #16 was again transferred to the hospital for evaluation for altered mental status and aggressive behavior. The Registered Nurse who was transferring the Resident out documented Also, due to aggressive and combative behavior [her/his] bed would not be held and this was explained to the family. There is no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that staff were competent in medication administration for 4 of 5 licensed nurses and failed to ensure that 10 of 10 direct care staff were competent in infection control measures. Findings include:Per review of the Facility Assessment, last reviewed 5/5/25, indicates that the facility offers medication management, and infection prevention and control as services and care offered to meet the residents' needs. The Facility Assessment reveals that the training program :included an orientation process and ongoing training for all new and existing staff . and is based on staff need and resident characteristics.1.) Medication administration errors were observed during survey. See F759 for more information.Per review of employee education files, 4 of 5 licensed nursing staff did not have documentation to demonstrate that they had the skill necessary to administer medication.2) Infection control deficiencies were identified with resident care during survey. See F880 for more information.Per review of employee…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that food was prepared in a safe sanitary manner and environment. This has the potential to impact all residents in the facility. Findings include: Per record review of the facility's Food Safety Requirements policy [last revised 1/1/25] states, Food safety practices shall be followed throughout the facility's entire food handling process .Elements of the process include the following:.b. Storage of food in a manner that helps prevent deterioration or contamination of the food, including from growth of microorganisms.6. All equipment used in the handling of food shall be cleaned, sanitized, and handled in a manner to prevent contamination.Per observation of the kitchen on 7/28/25 at 8:45 AM, there was a pool of water on the floor in front of refrigerator. The kitchen staff member stated, The sink leaks. She stated the maintenance director would be in the next day to address the water on the floor.Per observation on 7/28/25 at 8:45 AM, there was food debris under serving table including pasta and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
  Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the facility assessment provided adequate information related to competencies and training and failed to address needed positions. Findings include: 1. Per review of the facility Infection Preventionist job description implemented on 5/1/2025 section 6. states The IP must be employed at least part-time and the amount of time should be determined by the facility assessment, to determine the resources it needs for its IPCP [Infection Prevention Control Program]. Designated IP hours per week may vary based on the facility and its resident population. Section 7. States The facility based on the facility assessment will determine if the individual functioning as the IP should be dedicated solely to the IPCP. The IP must have the time necessary to properly assess develop implement, monitor, and manage the IPCP for the facility, address training requirements, and participate in required committees such as QAA [Quality Assessment and Assurance]. 8. The IP will physically work on site in the facility. Per review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that a risk assessment was completed to identify areas at risk for Legionella (a bacteria found in water that can cause a serious type of pneumonia, Legionnaires' disease) could grow and spread in the facility's water system, and failed to ensure proper infection control practices were followed. Findings include: 1. Per review of the facility's water management program, it did not contain a risk assessment to identify and prevent areas in the building where Legionella could grow and spread in the facility's water system. Per review of the facility policy with a reviewed/revised date of 3/2021 states, surveillance is one component of the facility's water management plans for reducing the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in the facility's water systems and In the absence of Legionella infections for a period of at least one year, the facility shall implement primary prevention strategies. Per interview with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-30 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that a infection preventionist was employed at least part time. Findings include: During an interview with the Registered Nurse (RN) identified as the Infection IP and the Director of Nursing (DON) on 7/29/25 at approximately 3:30 PM, they confirmed that the RN was covering as the IP and is an employee of another facility that is owned by the same owner. The IP stated that they are at the facility on an as-needed basis, about one day a week. When asked to describe the facilities IP Program the IP stated that she works with the Pharmacist and reviews antibiotic usage and ensures that antibiotic time outs are implemented. When asked about the facilities infection surveillance logs, updates to policies and procedures, and water management (Legionella prevention) for the facility the IP deferred to the Administrator.The facility Infection Preventionist job description implemented on 5/1/2025 section 6. states The IP must be employed at least part-time and the amount of time should be determined by the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-07-30 · tag F0945 — failed to train staff on abuse prevention — widespread
  Include as part of its infection prevention and control program, mandatory training that includes written standards, policies, and procedures for the program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff have infection prevention and control training that covers facility policy and procedures for 10 of 10 sampled direct care staff. Findings include:Per review of employee education files, 5 of 5 licensed nursing staff and 5 of 5 LNAs did not have documentation to demonstrate that they received infection control training, including training on the facility infection prevention and control policy and procedures, other than hand hygiene.Per interview on 7/29/25 at 2:40 PM, Registered Nurse #1 explained that she is an agency nurse and the only training that the facility provided was training on the electronic medical record training and an onboarding packet.Per interview on 7/30/25 at 10:32 AM, the Director of Nursing, who is responsible for direct care staff training and competencies, described that infection control training should be done on hire and annually. She stated that there have been gaps in staff education and competency evaluation.Per interview on 7/30/25 at approximately 1:45 PM, the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$37,040 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $23,660 — penalty dated 2026-03-05
• $13,380 — penalty dated 2024-07-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 7 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $77K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VT