Rock Hill Health & Rehabilitation
1530 James Street, Bellingham, WA 98225 · For profit - Corporation · 52 certified beds · (360) 733-9161 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2024
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $74,794 in federal fines (most recent 2025-03-11)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.0% | 14.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.6% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 1.0% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.1% | 1.6% | 2.0% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 12.5% | 17.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 2.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.6% | 17.2% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.2% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.2% | 93.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.6% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.0% | 22.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 18.5% | 15.1% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 91.8% | 82.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.8% | 19.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 15.8% | 13.4% | 12.0% | worse |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
60.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 67 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 74.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.32 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 53% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 9% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 60.5%CMS range 51.3–73.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.5%CMS range 6.0–13.9 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 74.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 69.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 66.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 80.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.9% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.0%CMS range 3.8–11.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.99 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 52 beds and averages 45.3 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.36 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.91 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.66 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 27% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.09 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
57 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · L2025-05-01 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespreadAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility Administration failed to ensure the facility's finances were maintained effectively for continuity of resident care and services. The Administration was aware the facility was behind on vendor payments and receiving notices for discontinuation of services. The Administration's failure to ensure the facility met their financial obligations to vendors resulted in the facility laboratory services provider discontinuing services to the facility resulted in four residents (Residents 10, 34, 95, and 7) not receiving timely laboratory services, and placed all 41 residents at risk of not receiving necessary care and services and constituted an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). On 04/25/2025 at 5:19 PM, the facility was notified of an IJ in F835. The facility removed the immediacy on 04/26/2025 as confirmed by an onsite verification by a surveyor after the facility ensured past due resident lab testing had been completed and an active laboratory services vendor was in place. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · K2025-05-01 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — patternProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely laboratory services were provided for 5 of 5 residents (Residents 7, 10, 15, 34 and 95) reviewed for laboratory services. Resident 15 did not have a urinalysis sample collected for laboratory study per physician order, Resident 7 did not have a Hemoglobin A1C (lab measures blood sugars in the body over a period) test completed as ordered and Resident 95 did not have a metabolic panel and blood count completed timely. Resident 10 and 34's Depakote levels (critical lab test to determine therapeutic drug level in the body and prevent toxicity for seizure medications, reference range 50-100) were not completed timely as ordered and constituted an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). These failures placed residents at risk of delay in treatment, drug toxicity, decline in medical conditions, hospitalization and a diminished quality of life. On 05/01/2025, the facility was notified of an IJ for F770. The immediate jeopardy was determined to begin on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a pressure offloading mattress was ordered and implemented timely to prevent pressure ulcer (PU)/pressure injury (PI) development for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 7) reviewed for facility acquired PU. Resident 7 experienced harm when they developed a preventable Stage 3 PU to their coccyx (tailbone), requiring wound vacuum treatment which impacted the resident's rehabilitation and discharge potential. This failure placed residents at risk for adverse outcomes and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . PRESSURE ULCER DEFINITION AND STAGES The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) April 2016, defined Pressure Ulcer (PU) Definition and Stages as: -A PU is localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device. The injury can present itself as intact skin or an open ulcer and may be painful. The injury occurs as a result of intense and/or prolonged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-03-14 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was free from neglect for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) when the facility failed to provide Resident 1 with the routine physician ordered Circulation Motor Sensory (CMS - a medical exam/check of the resident's neurological and vascular health) to their left leg. Resident 1 experienced harm when they were found with a Stage 4 (a full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle. Nonviable tissue, dead or devitalized tissue may be present on some parts of the wound bed. Often includes undermining, which was destruction of tissue or ulceration extending under the skin edges, and tunneling, which was a passageway of tissue destruction under the skin surface) which pressure injury they had developed unbeknownst to the facility. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program (screening, training and prevention), showed the definition for neglect is found in the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, and signs of actual physical neglect included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff consistently provided the skin integrity and Circulation Motor Sensory (CMS - a medical exam/check of the resident's neurological and vascular health) assessment and monitoring as ordered, for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) reviewed for pressure ulcer/pressure injury (PU/PI). Resident 1 experienced harm when they developed an avoidable Stage 4 (a full thickness tissue loss of tissue with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle. There may be nonviable tissue, dead or devitalized tissue present on some parts of the wound bed) PU/PI under the resident's knee brace (also known as an immobilizer - a medical device that stabilizes your knee joint and holds it in place). This failed practice placed residents at risk for developing PU/PIs under a brace and/or immobilizers. Findings included . Review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, dated October 2023, defined: -…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that interpret prescriber's orders, reflect current standards of practice, assure the accurate acquiring, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) in place to meet the needs of each resident for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) reviewed for medication management. Failure to ensure drugs and biologicals were administered per the physician order and standard of nursing practice placed residents at risk medication errors, unmet health care needs and a decreased quality of life. Findings included. Review of a facility's policy titled, Medication and Flexible Pass Time, dated 10/27/2023, documented to all medications will be passed according to the physician's orders and medication guidelines. The facility had a flexible medication pass in their policy which directed the Licensed Nurse (LN) that all morning mediations must be administered between the hours of 6:00 AM to 11:00 AM, noon medications were administered between 11:00 AM and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have a functioning medication administration system to ensure the licensed nurse (LN) followed professional standards, medications were administered per the providers orders, medications were not omitted, and failed to follow facility policy regarding the ten rights to medication administration for 7 of 8 sampled residents (Residents 3, 11, 5, 6, 9, 8, and 10) reviewed for mediation administration. These failures placed residents at risk for potential negative adverse effects to mediations, complications, not receiving their medications as prescribed by the physician and a decline in their health status. Findings included. Review of a facility's policy titled, Medication and Flexible Pass Time, dated 10/27/2023, documented to all medications will be passed according to the physician's orders, and the nurse will follow the 10 rights to medication administration (note the policy did not indicate what the 10 rights to medication administration were). The facility had a flexible medication pass in their policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a treatment cart was locked/secured in the absence of a nurse for 1 of 2 treatment carts ([NAME] Lane treatment cart) observed, and proper labeling and storing of medications for 1 of 3 medication cart (Artist Lane medication cart) reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk of having unintended access and potential for ingestion of medications and biologicals that should be stored and locked. Findings included. Review of a facility policy titled, Medication and Flexible Pass Time, dated 10/27/2023, documented to keep the medication cart locked at all times.<[NAME] LANE TREATMENT CART>On 03/16/2026 at 8:07 AM, the [NAME] Lane treatment cart was observed to be unlocked. Staff D, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was observed down the hallway at a medication cart. On 03/16/2026 at 8:12 AM, [NAME] Lane's treatment cart was observed to be unlocked. There were unidentified staff walking by the unlocked cart going to the dining room.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standard infection control practices by not cleaning and disinfecting resident care equipment to include vital sign (VS) equipment and a glucometer (a small portable medical device used to measure the concentration of sugar in the blood) machine per the manufactures guidelines for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 5), consistently implement hand hygiene when preparing resident medications for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 11 and 5), placing on and removing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for 1 of 1 nurses (Staff D) observed for medication administration. These failures placed residents at risk of obtaining infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings included. Review of the facility's handouts for Donning (placing on) PPE, and Removing PPE, both handouts were from the Infection Prevention Manual for Long Term Care revised on 02/2018, documented on the Donning PPE hand out under Safe Work Practices to perform hand hygiene. Review of the Removing PPE hand out, documented to remove PPE at the doorway…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to conduct thorough investigations for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1 and 2) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The failure to conduct thorough investigations placed all residents at risk for repeat incidents, potential injury, and unmet care needs. Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property, revised 09/21/2022 document showed the administrator was responsible for the overall coordination and implementation of the facility's abuse prevention program policies and procedures .the investigation will at a minimum include interviews of alleged perpetrators, and review all medical records. <RESIDENT 1>Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis (disease that affects the brain and spinal cord), and anxiety. Review of Resident 1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE], the resident had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-11 · tag F0851 — isolatedElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate submission of the Payroll Based Journal (PBJ) per the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) requirement for 1 of 1 Fiscal Year (FY) Quarter (Q4 2024 [October1 through December 31, 2024]), reviewed for PBJ submission. This failed practice resulted in CMS having inaccurate data related to nursing home staffing levels which had the potential to impact on the care and services provided to all the residents in the facility.Findings included . Review of the Q4 2024 HPRD (Hours Per Resident Day) Reporting Results FY Quarter 4 2024 (October 1 - December 31) showed the facility dd not meet the minimum 3.4 HPRD and was short 920 hours.During an interview on 07/10/2025 at 1:30 PM Staff B, Business Office Manager, stated the corporate office completes the report for PBJ and HPRD, sends it to the administrator for review and approval, then corporate office submits the report. In a review of the facility PBJ report for FY Quarter 4 2024 showed reported hours for facility employed staff only and did not include agency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-05-01 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility Governing Body failed to ensure the facility's finances were maintained. The Governing Body was aware the facility was behind on vendor payments and receiving notices for discontinuation of services. The Governing Body's failure to ensure oversite of the facility Administration to meet their financial obligations to vendors resulted in the facility laboratory services provider discontinuing services to the facility and placed all 41 residents at risk of not receiving necessary care and services. Findings included . Review of the undated facility policy titled Administrative Management (Governing Board), stated the Governing Board had full legal authority and responsibility for the management and operation of the facility. Based on record review the following vendors sent demand bill notices to the facility: Trident Lab corporation, past due $9,536.92 with a hold for non-payment. City of [NAME] water, a shut off notice was sent on 04/07/2025 with shut off date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct thorough investigations for 4 of 6 residents (Residents 5, 6, 10 and 27) reviewed for accidents and potential abuse or neglect. The failure to conduct complete and thorough investigations placed residents at risk for repeat incidents, injury, and lack of appropriate corrective action on the part of the facility. Findings included . Review of chapter two of the Nursing Home Guidelines, sixth edition, dated October 2015 showed that A thorough investigation was a systematic collection and review of evidence/information that describes and explains an event or a series of events. It seeks to determine if abuse, neglect, abandonment, personal and/or financial exploitation or misappropriation of resident property occurred, and how to prevent further occurrences .The investigation should end with the identification of who was involved in the incident, and what, when, where, why, and how the incident happened, including the probable or reasonable cause.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 4 of 5 residents (Residents 6, 10, 15 and 28) reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessments, were accurately completed prior to or upon admission to facility, or updated if resident's conditions change. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving timely and necessary mental health services, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, PASRR undated showed that all new admissions and readmissions are screened for mental disorders (MD). Intellectual disabilities (ID) or related disorder (RD) per the Medicaid Pre-admission PASRR process. The social worker is responsible for making referrals to the appropriate state-designated authority. <RESIDENT 6> Resident 6 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include major depressive disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment, dated 04/09/2025,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-05-01 · tag F0729 — patternVerify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that 9 of 9 sampled Certified Nursing Assistant (CNAs) (Staff W, Staff J, Staff X, Staff Y, Staff Z, Staff AA, Staff BB, Staff CC, and Staff K) reviewed for background checks were verified as active on the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA). This failure placed residents at risk of being cared for by unqualified staff, unmet care needs, diminished quality of life, and possible harm. Findings included . Staff M, Nursing Assistant Certified (NAC) was hired on [DATE]. In a review of Staff M, employment records showed no completed OBRA verification. In an interview on [DATE] at 1:47 PM Staff L, Business Office Manager, stated they were aware Staff M did not have an updated OBRA. Staff L provided an expired OBRA verification for Staff M, which showed an expiration of [DATE]. Staff L stated they were completing OBRA verifications for NAC's as they expired and did not have a plan in place to update expired OBRA's previous to their employment.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 5 residents (Residents 1, 6, 9, and 15) reviewed for unnecessary medications were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) as required. The facility failed to ensure person-centered behavioral interventions were in place, and to ensure appropriate indications were present for psychotropic medications and that each resident's entire drug/medication regimen is managed and monitored to promote or maintain the resident's highest practicable mental, physical, and psychosocial well-being. consents were obtained prior to administration of psychotropic medications. These failures placed the residents at risk for medication-related complications and for receiving unnecessary psychotropic medication. Finding included . As referenced in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Safety Information, anti-psychotic medications have serious side effects and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a system in which residents' records were complete, accurate, accessible, and systematically organized for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 6, 7, and 10) reviewed for accurate PASRR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review), Medication Administration Records (MAR) and Treatment Administration Records (TAR). Failure to ensure clinical records were complete and accurate made it impossible to determine what care and services were provided, or should have been provided, and placed residents at risk for medical complications, unmet care need and for diminished quality of life. Findings included: Review of the facility policy titled Documentation Standards-Resident Health Record, undated documented the policy of the community is to maintain a Resident Health Record that reflects the accurate and progressive condition of the resident, including care provided, interventions and outcomes, in a manner that is consistent with current health care and legal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to immediately report to the state agency potential abuse/neglect of 1 of 4 residents (Resident 10) reviewed for accidents. Failure to report potential allegations of abuse and/or neglect placed residents at risk for unidentified abuse, and therefore, continued mistreatment and a poor quality of life. Findings included . According to the Nursing Home Guidelines - The Purple Book, sixth edition, dated October 2015, showed Individual mandated reporters must immediately report to the Department's hotline when there is a reasonable cause to believe an incident is abuse, neglect, abandonment, mistreatment, substantial injuries of unknown source, should be reported to the Department of Social Health Services (DSHS) Hotline number, logged within five days and Police or 911 called. Examples of substantial injuries may include, but are not limited to, the following: Abrasions, burns, deep lacerations, bruises of deep color and depth, or those occurring in areas not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure written notification of facility-initiated transfer and/or discharge was completed for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 31, 37, and 144) reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility failed to ensure the transfer/discharge notice with all the required information was provided in a timely, practical manner upon an emergency transfer to the hospital. This failure placed residents and their representatives at risk of not receiving accurate information related to resident's discharge. Findings included . Review of Resident 31's medical record showed they were transferred to the emergency department on 03/28/2025 and there was no documentation that the notice of transfer/discharge had been provided to the resident and/or their representative, only a progress note from Staff G, Social Services stating that a notice had been sent to the ombudsman. Review of Resident 37's medical record showed they were transferred to the emergency department on 03/11/2025 and there was no documentation that the notice of transfer/discharge had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written bed hold notices at the time of transfer to the hospital for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 31, 37, and 144) reviewed for hospitalizations. This failure placed the residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed while in the hospital. Findings included . Review of Resident 31's medical record showed they were transferred to the emergency department on 03/28/2025 and there was no documentation of a bed hold notice being provided to the resident or their representative. Review of Resident 37's medical record showed they were transferred to the emergency department on 03/11/2025 and there was no documentation that the bed hold notice had been provided to the resident or their representative. Review of Resident 114's medical record showed they were transferred to the emergency department on 04/28/2025 and there was no documentation that the bed hold notice had been provided to the resident or their representative. In an interview on 04/29/2025 at 1:41 PM, Staff I, Registered Nurse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised as required for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 10 and 15) reviewed for psychotropic medication review. This failure had the potential to impact staff knowledge of resident needs, placing resident's at risk for decreased quality of care and negative outcomes. Findings included . According to the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual, dated October 2024 showed the RAI helps nursing home staff gather definitive information on a resident's strengths and needs, which must be addressed in an individualized care plan. It also assists staff with evaluating goal achievement and revising care plans accordingly by enabling the nursing home to track changes in the resident's status. As the process of problem identification is integrated with sound clinical interventions, the care plan becomes each resident's unique path toward achieving or maintaining his or her highest practical level of well-being. The focus of the psychotropic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0659 — isolatedProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 7 sampled staff (Staff EE) had an active professional Nursing Assistant Certification (NAC). Findings included . Review of Staff EE's employment record showed they were hired on [DATE] as an NAC. Review of the NAC certification in Staff EE's employee record dated [DATE] showed it had expired on [DATE]. Review of the staff roster provided on [DATE] showed Staff EE was an NAC. Review of the website Washington State Provider Credential Search on [DATE] showed Staff EE's, NAC certification expired as of [DATE]. Review of Staff EE's timecard showed they had worked at the facility on the following dates, without a certification: [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE], [DATE] and [DATE], [DATE], and [DATE]. In an interview on [DATE] at 10:12 AM Staff L, Business Office manager, stated Staff EE was hired on their birthday and their certification was active when they were hired. Staff L stated they failed to follow up to ensure Staff EE had gotten their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly provide professional standards of care and services for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 10, 15, and 27) reviewed for medication management. The facility failed to hold cardiac medications per physician orders, and to reassess abnormal blood pressure (BP) or heart rate (HR) values and notify the provider of abnormal findings. This failed practice placed residents at risk for adverse health effects, medication complications, hospitalization, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 15> Resident 15 admitted on [DATE] with cardiac diagnoses of atherosclerosis of aorta (hardening of heart valve), prosthetic heart valve, hypertension (high blood pressure) and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). Review of Resident 15's physician's orders directed the nurses to give Amlodipine 5 MG daily and hold the dose for systolic blood pressure SBP- the first number, called systolic blood pressure, measures the pressure in your blood vessels…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (Resident 6) reviewed for hydration were consistently monitored and received adequate fluids. This failure placed residents at risk for dehydration, constipation, urinary tract infections (UTI), and other health complications including worsening cognitive impairment and behavioral changes. Findings included . Resident 6 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including severe vascular dementia and a history of UTI's. The resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 04/09/2025, documented the resident had significant cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living including eating. The resident had no rejection of care. Review of the Registered Dietician (RD) assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident 6's estimated daily fluid needs were 1900 cc. Review of the Med Nutrition Therapy progress note dated 01/02/2025 at 7:03 PM, showed no documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on an interview, observation, and record review, the facility did not adequately reassess, report, or provide effective pain management for 1 of 1 (Resident 1). This oversight resulted in the resident experiencing discomfort during routine tasks such as repositioning and peri-care. Furthermore, the situation may have affected the resident's quality of life and increased the risk of developing bed sores. Findings Included . <Resident 1> Resident 1 was a long-term resident of the facility. According to the admission MDS dated [DATE], Resident 1 was mildly cognitively impaired. Review of policy titled 'Pain Assessment and Management' dated 03/25/2024, documented: Staff will identify situations or interventions that increase resident pain, staff will know why pain medication is being administered, and staff will conduct and document pain levels when residents' pain increases . During an observation on 04/25/2025 at 8:37 AM, Resident 1 was in the hall next to the nursing cart where Staff H, Licensed Practical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record reviews, the facility failed to complete annual staff performance reviews yearly as required and provide education based on the outcome of these reviews for 1 of 5 sampled staff (Staff M), reviewed for performance reviews. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving care from inadequately trained and/or underqualified care staff, and diminished quality of life. Findings Included . Staff M was hired on 12/02/2022 as a nursing assistant certified (NAC). In a review of Staff M's performance evaluation showed it was an annual evaluation but was not dated or signed by the evaluator or the staff. The performance evaluation was one page and at the bottom of the page indicated there was two pages to the evaluation. No other documents were provided for Staff M's performance evaluation. In an interview on 05/01/2025 at 11:30 AM Staff A, Administrator stated they had just recently gotten evaluations caught up to August of 2025 and they were now doing the evaluations on the staff's anniversary date. No other information was provided. Reference WAC…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services including all procedures that assured accurate order entry, dispensing and administration of medications in the facility, occurred for 1of 1 resident (Resident 7) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The failure to ensure accurate orders and administration for Resident 7 resulted in a duplication error and placed residents at risk for adverse outcomes. Findings included . Resident 7 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included osteoporosis. Review of Resident 7's physician's orders dated 12/08/2024 documented an order for Alendronate 70mg once per week on Monday at 5:00 AM to treat osteoporosis. Review of Resident 7's physician's orders dated 04/08/2025 showed a duplicate order was entered for Alendronate 70mg per week on Sunday at 7:00 AM to treat osteoporosis. Review of the Medication Administration Record for the month of April 2025 showed signatures for both doses of Alendronate signed as given:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmaceutical services including all procedures that assured accurate order entry, dispensing and administration of medications in the facility, occurred for 1of 1 resident (Resident 7) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The failure to ensure accurate orders and administration for Resident 7 resulted in a duplication error and placed residents at risk for adverse outcomes. Findings included . Resident 7 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included osteoporosis. Review of Resident 7's physician's orders dated 12/08/2024 documented an order for Alendronate 70mg once per week on Monday at 5:00 AM to treat osteoporosis. Review of Resident 7's physician's orders dated 04/08/2025 showed a duplicate order was entered for Alendronate 70mg per week on Sunday at 7:00 AM to treat osteoporosis. Review of the Medication Administration Record for the month of April 2025 showed signatures for both doses of Alendronate signed as given:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 nursing assistant certified (NAC) (Staff M) failed to receive the required dementia care, abuse and neglect, communication and quality assurance performance improvement (QAPI) training's and 12-hour training. These failures to ensure NACs received required training placed residents at risk of less than competent care and services from staff. Findings included . Staff M was hired 12/02/2022. In a review of Staff M's training record showed: -A signed statement of understanding for Abuse /Neglect Policy and Procedures on 03/22/2024 -A signed document dated 02/22/2024 titled Mandated Reporter -A completed abuse and neglect quiz dated 02/22/2024. -A signed and completed test titled, Care of the Cognitively Impaired No other training documents were provided for Staff M. In an interview on 04/29/2025 at 10:34 AM Staff L, Business Office Manager stated the facility is not gathering information on 12 hours of education for agency NAC's. Staff L stated for in-house staff there is an online training system for staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary supervision and services for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for elopement. The failure to provide the necessary supervision and services for Resident 1 resulted in an elopement and placed the resident at risk for injury. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Resident Wandering Policy undated, showed residents would be assessed for wandering risk at admission. A resident would be determined an increased risk for wandering for an assessment score of 9 or higher and the following interventions would be put into place: - Consent for wander guard placement - Notification to the provider of the wander risk - Care plan would reflect risk of wandering - Resident specific information placed in the wander risk book located at the nurse's station - Residents at risk of wandering would be reassessed quarterly and as needed, nursing would ensure wander guard bracelets for placement daily and document in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment on 2 of 2 resident units and 1 of 1 outdoor space reviewed for the environment. The failure to ensure walls, ceilings, floors, and outdoor spaces were homelike and in good repair, and water temperatures were comfortable, placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life in their home. Findings included . <RESIDENT ROOMS AND HALLS> based on is 2 of 2 units . An observation of resident rooms and halls on 05/14/2024 at 1:43 PM showed: -room [ROOM NUMBER] wallboard coming loose from the wall near the window. - Two broken ceiling tiles on 100 hall near the exit sign and in the back hall. - A two by four-inch spot of tan paint over a cream-colored wall next to room [ROOM NUMBER]. - room [ROOM NUMBER] had large dark circular staining in the floor wax. - room [ROOM NUMBER] had gouges in the drywall behind where the headboard of the bed would be. - room [ROOM NUMBER] had a large, gouged area in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision, implement interventions, and update the care plan to prevent accidents/falls for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 31) reviewed for accidents/incidents. This failure caused Resident 31 to have recurrent falls resulting in injury for 5 of 11 falls reviewed, and placed residents at risk for falls, injury, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses to include chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low blood oxygen levels), severe protein calorie malnutrition(inadequate intake of food, protein, calories, and other essential nutrients), muscle wasting and atrophy of left thigh(decrease in strength of muscles), metabolic encephalopathy (brain disfunction), cognitive communication deficit (difficulty communicating from injury to the brain), and dementia (memory loss). A review of the resident's Quarterly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0730 — patternObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete required annual performance evaluations for 3 of 3 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) (Staff E, F, G ), who had been employed at the facility greater than one year. Failure to complete annual performance evaluations, and ensure staff members had met yearly performance and competency requirements, placed residents at risk for dimished quality of care. Findings included . Staff E, CNA, was hired 01/04/2013. Review of Staff E's requested employee file information showed no Annual performance review was provided for the prior year. Staff F, CNA, was hired 06/09/2020. Review of Staff F's requested employee file information showed no Annual performance review was provided for the prior year. Staff G, CNA, was hired 12/06/2021. Review of Staff G's requested employee file information showed no Annual performance review was provided for the prior year. In an interview on 05/14/2024 at 9:20 AM, Staff A, Administrator, stated the annual performance evaluations were not done. Refer to WAC 388-97-1680 (2)(a-c) .
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and served under sanitary conditions in 1 of 1 facility kitchens. The failure to ensure they had hot water in the kitchen handwashing sink, to use safe procedures for cooling foods to be re-used at a later meal, to use safe dishwashing procedures, and to do hand hygiene after cleaning counters and before dishing up foods placed residents at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings included . In an observation and interview on 05/13/2024 at 9:20 AM, the kitchen handwashing sink water was lukewarm to touch. Staff Q, Dietary Manager, stated the hot water repairmen were onsite and they would have the hot water fixed soon. In an interview on 05/13/2024 at 10:07 AM, Staff Q stated they did not have a process for cooling foods to be re-used at a later meal. Staff Q stated when they cooled foods for re-use, they cooled them in a 2-inch-deep pan at room temperature, then later they would put the foods in the refrigerator to finish cooling, but they had no process for checking the food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-16 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — patternEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) (Staff E, F, G), reviewed for training, had the required 12 hours per year of in-service education and the required annual dementia training. This failure placed residents at risk of less than competent care and services from staff. Findings included . Staff E, CNA, was hired on 01/04/2013. Review of their employee file showed they did not have the required 12 hours of in-service education for the prior year. Staff F, CNA, was hired on 06/09/2020. Review of their employee file showed they did not have the required 12 hours of in-service education or the required dementia training for the prior year. Staff G, CNA, was hired on 12/06/2021. Review of their employee file showed they did not have the required 12 hours of in-service education or the required dementia training for the prior year. In an interview on 05/14/2024 at 9:20 AM, Staff A, Administrator, stated the facility training program had changed and there were challenges retrieving some of the older training…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to honor 1 of 2 residents (Resident 21) choices regarding bathing. The facility failed to accommodate resident's preferences for bathing frequency. This failed practice placed residents at risk for unmet bathing needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Record review of the facility's policy titled, Bath/Shower, dated 12/2023, showed staff were to ensure residents received bathing per their preferences and the policy also showed if the resident refused shower, to report to the Licensed Nurse and/or Resident Care Manager (RCM) and to offer different type of bathing service, to offer different day or time and have another team member attempt to ask and re-approach the resident. Family may also be called in to assist with resident's refusal. <RESIDENT 21> Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the annual Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) assessment, dated 04/17/2024, the resident was cognitively intact. In an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) process (a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who had a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities were offered the most appropriate setting for their needs [in the community, a nursing facility, or acute care setting]; and received the services they need in those settings), was followed for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 37 and 8) for medication review. Failure to refer Resident 8 for Level II (an in-depth evaluation to determine whether the resident requires specialized rehabilitation services) services as indicated, and implement the Level II recommendations received for Resident 37, placed the residents at risk for not receiving care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. Findings included . <RESIDENT 37> Resident 37 admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included bipolar disorder (a serious mental illness characterized by extreme…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to fully develop a baseline care plan and/or to provide a written summary of the baseline care plan information that included all of the required elements to 3 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 15, 191, and 37) reviewed for baseline care plans. This failure placed residents at risk of not being informed of their medications, dietary instructions, services, and treatments to be administered, or goals of care, and could lead to unmet care needs. Findings included . <RESIDENT 15> Resident 15 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include left femur fracture, falls, Alzheimer's (a brain disease that causes impaired memory, thinking, behavior, and language skills), diabetes (DM), and hypertension (HTN [high blood pressure]). Review of Resident 15's current medical record, showed the baseline care plan was incomplete. There was no information regarding: pain, skin conditions or risk factors, fall risk, bladder incontinence, nutrition,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 18) reviewed for nutrition. The facility failure to weigh the new resident and to implement orders for daily weights placed residents at risk for unrecognized weight loss or weight gain. Findings included . Resident 18 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 18's hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], showed an order for daily weights. Review of Resident 18's weight history from the date of admission to 05/15/2024, showed staff had documented only one weight, on the day of admission, 04/03/2024. In an interview on 05/14/2024 at 11:29 AM, Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse/Resident Care Manager, stated they don't always get the discharge summaries when residents admit to the facility, so they can't go by that. Staff C stated they didn't review the discharge summaries; they thought another nurse would do that. Staff C stated Resident 18 had been refusing to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure cleanliness of respiratory care tubing equipment for three of five sampled residents (Residents 31, 33, and 141) reviewed. Failure to replace oxygen administration equipment or nebulized medication equipment placed residents at risk for using soiled equipment and for acquiring infections. Findings included . <RESIDENT 31> Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], re-admission on [DATE], with diagnoses to include chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (low blood O2 levels), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [a disease that blocks air flow and makes it difficult to breathe]. Review of the Resident 31's physician orders showed O2 therapy continuously through a nasal cannula (NC, tubing that delivers oxygen into the nose through prongs) and aerosol breathing treatments daily via nebulizer (aerosolizes medications) machine. There were no orders to change O2 tubing, change nebulizer tubing, or cleaning/replacing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents (Resident 8) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) as required. The facility failed to ensure consents were obtained and the resident received gradual dose reductions. These failures placed the residents at risk for medication-related complications and for receiving unnecessary psychotropic medication. Findings included . <RESIDENT 8> Resident 8 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, unspecified dementia (was dementia without a type of specific diagnosis) with psychotic disturbance (hallucinations [usually visual], delusions, and delusional misidentifications), anxiety disorder, and hypertension. Review of the March 2024 Medication Administration Records (MAR), showed Resident 8 received an antidepressant medication (bupropion) for a diagnosis of major depression, an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to store medications in a safe place for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 18) reviewed who had medications stored in their room. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medications and for having unintended access to drugs that should have been securely stored. Findings included . Resident 18 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In an observation/interview on 05/09/2024 at 1:46 PM, observed Lantus (a type of insulin) and Humalog (a type of insulin) pens being stored in a basin on Resident 18's windowsill in their room. Resident 18 stated those insulins had been there since the previous Friday. In an observation/interview on 05/09/2024 at 4:22 PM, Staff B, Registered Nurse/Director of Nursing Services, was observed removing the insulins from Resident 18's room, they were unable to provide any information why the medications were being stored in the resident's room. Refer to WAC 388-97-1300 (2) .
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure clinical records were complete and accurate for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 21) reviewed for skin conditions. The failure to ensure clinical records were complete and accurate placed residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings included . Resident 21 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the Annual Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) assessment, dated 04/17/2024, the resident was cognitively intact. Resident 21 had a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rhythm) that required a blood thinner medication. In an observation on 05/09/2024 at 11:59 AM, Resident 21's feet and lower legs were observed have scattered bruising in various stages of healing. Review of Resident 21's weekly skin assessments, dated 05/04/2024 and 05/11/2024, showed no documentation of any bruising. Review of the Treatment Administration Record from 05/01/2024 through 05/14/2024, showed staff were to monitor Resident 21 for any adverse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to use adequate infection control practices for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 18) observed for wound incontinent care and wound cares. Staff failed to change gloves and perform necessary hand hygiene during the cares which resulted in contamination of the resident's bedding, clothing, and the light pull cord. Staff also failed to use good principles of infection control when they wiped the resident's groin during incontinent cares, then while still wearing the same contaminated gloves wiped the rash in the resident's abdominal folds. These failures placed residents at risk of communicable diseases and/or healthcare associated diseases, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 18 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In an observation of incontinent care on 05/13/2024 at 11:39 AM, Staff N, Nursing Assistant Certified (NAC), and Staff O, NAC, provided Resident 18 incontinent care. Staff N was observed to wipe Resident 18's groin, then while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident/resident representative written notice of transfer/discharge which identified the reason for transfer, the transfer date, location transferred to, or a statement of the resident's appeal rights for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed residents at risk for being inappropriately discharged and/or not understanding their rights regarding the discharge process. Findings included . Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included a brain bleed, muscle weakness and paralysis on their left side, cognitive communication deficit, and dysphagia (difficulty or discomfort in swallowing). Review of Resident 1's progress notes, dated 02/04/2024 through 3/05/2024, showed Resident 1 experienced an emergency and was transferred to the emergency room on [DATE]. In an interview on 03/05/2024 at 4:00 PM Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN), stated they were not involved in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident/resident representative at the time of transfer or within 24 hours of transfer, a written notice that specified the bed hold policy for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the resident at risk of being unaware of the right to hold their bed while in the hospital. Findings included . In a review of an undated facility policy titled, Bed Hold and Return to Facility Policy, showed the facility would provide the resident or representative with the information about bed hold policy, in an emergency, as soon as possible but no later than 24 hours after the transfer and a copy of the bed hold or release record would be filed in the resident's medical record. Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included brain bleed, muscle weakness and paralysis on their left side, cognitive communication deficit, and dysphagia (difficulty or discomfort in swallowing). Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff were compliant with Infection Prevention and Control Guidelines and standards of practice for 1 of 2 Halls (Forest Hall). The facility failed to ensure oversight and implementation of their Infection Prevention and Control Program during a Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19, an infectious disease-causing respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, new or worsening malaise [a general feeling of discomfort/uneasiness], headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, and in severe cases difficulty breathing that could result in severe impairment or death) outbreak. The facility failed to ensure staff used personal protective equipment (PPE) in accordance with national standards. These failures placed all residents, visitors, and staff at risk of developing and/or transmitting disease. The facility was currently in a Covid-19 outbreak. Findings included . Review of the CDC (Centers for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring a communicable disease outbreak for Coronavirus Disease 2019 COVID-19) was reported to the state reporting agency (Complaint Resolution Unit - CRU) 1 of 1 disease outbreaks reviewed. The facility failed to report a communicable disease outbreak in the facility for five days after the outbreak was identified and failed to log the outbreak on the state reporting log. This failure to report to the required state agency and log the outbreak on the state reporting log placed all residents at risk for unidentified and uninvestigated exposure to a communicable disease. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property, revised 09/21/2022, stated the facility followed the Washington State reporting guidelines found in the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, for reporting requirements, methods of reporting, reporting guidelines, and reporting timelines. The facility will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-02-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment for three of five resident care areas (Artist Hall, Forest Hall, and dining room) reviewed for environment. The facility failed to ensure the dining area was free of dust and dirt build up on the blinds, walls were painted and repaired, and floor tile was clean and free of cracks and peels. The facility failure to provide maintenance services placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life. Findings included . In observations on 02/14/2023: > Forest Hall the flooring had numerous cracks throughout the hallway, with the edges of the tile along the walls were peeling away from the wall. The color of the tile was discolored brown and discolored. The walls had discolored stains that dried dripping down to the floorboard. There was a ceiling tile missing, showing exposed pipes and electrical wires in the middle of the hallway. > Dining room blinds were observed to be covered in dust and dirt during the meal service, and the floor into the dining room was brown and discolored. In observations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-17 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to inform the resident or their designated representatives of the resident's medication regimen for 2 of 3 residents (5 and 10) reviewed for psychotropic medication treatment. The facility failed to inform the resident and/or their designated representatives prior to treatment of their mental health diagnosis with the use of psychotropic (drug that effects the mental state) medications. This failure to provide the residents and their representatives the opportunity to make an informed health care decision related to their treatment placed the residents at risk for potential unwanted medications and treatments. Findings include . Review of the facility policy titled, Behavior Management and Psychotropic Medication Policy and Procedure, undated stated that each resident at the facility will be free from unnecessary drugs, including psychotropic medication .upon admission resident that receive psychotropic medications will be assessed for use .consent will be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-17 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of two (25) residents reviewed for advance directives had been given information verbally and in writing to formulate an advance directive. This failure placed the resident at risk of not having their personal preferences followed regarding their care, unwanted medical services, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . ADVANCE DIRECTIVES An advance directive was written ahead of time, a health care advance directive was a written document that says how you want medical decisions to be made if you lose the ability to make decisions for yourself. A health care advance directive may include a Living Will and a Durable Power of Attorney for health care per the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) glossary. Resident 25 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side (stroke), hemiplegia and hemiparesis of right side (muscle weakness or partial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement comprehensive person-centered care plans for two of three (2 and 10) residents reviewed for positioning and mobility and one of three (19) residents reviewed for fall prevention. This failure to ensure the comprehensive care plan was implemented placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Person-Centered Care Plan, dated October 2017 showed that the comprehensive care plan is developed to incorporate the residents, goals, preferences, and services required to attain or maintain the residents highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. <POSITIONING/MOBILITY> RESIDENT 10 Resident 10 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Parkinson's (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with interventions to maintain or prevent declines in range of motion for two of two residents (10 and 27) reviewed for positioning and mobility. This failure had the potential to result in decreased mobility, contracture and/or increased pain and diminished quality of life. Findings included . RESIDENT 27 Resident 27 admitted [DATE] following a stroke. The resident had residual deficits involving cognition and physical mobility and required extensive assistance for activities of daily living. Review of the resident's treatment orders on 02/15/2023 showed following discontinuation of skilled therapies, the resident was set up for the following restorative nursing programs to maintain cognitive function and prevent contractures (permanent shortening of muscle due to lack of use): Nursing restorative Range of Motion (ROM) program: Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNAC) will spend at least 15 minutes or as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (8) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) as required. The facility failed to ensure appropriate indication and provide documented evidence of clinical rationale for the administration of psychotropic medications. This failure placed the resident at risk for potential medication related side effects. Findings Include . In review of the facility policy titled, Behavior Management and Psychotropic Medication Policy and Procedure, undated, stated that residents drug regime will be free from unnecessary drugs, to include psychotropic drugs. An unnecessary drug was defined as any drug used in excessive dose to include duplicate drug therapy, without adequate monitoring, without adequate indications for its use and in the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued. Resident 8 admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-02-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (%). Failure of 1 of 3 nurses (Staff C) to properly administer 3 of 26 medications for 1 resident (Resident 27) observed during medication pass resulted in a medication error rate of 11%. This failure placed the residents at risk for adverse side effects due to improper medication administration. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Enteral (stomach) tube medication administration, (revised [DATE]) showed medications for enteral (administration of nutrition or medication via the digestive tract) tubes were administered separately and to flush the tube between each medication by placing 15 milliliters (mL) (or prescribed amount) of water through the tube using gravity flow, pour dissolved/diluted medication in syringe and allow the medication to flow by gravity, and flush tube with 15mL of water between each medication. In an observation of medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to maintain 1 of 2 nourishment refrigerators. Failure to ensure foods were properly dated and labeled resulted in the potential for food borne illness related to expired and outdated foods. Findings included . Review of the undated facility policy titled: Use and storage of food brought into facility by family showed all foods and beverages: • Will be labeled with resident name and initial date of opening. • Should be thrown away that are past the manufacturer's expiration date or use by dates. • If there are no manufacurer expiration or use by dates, they are to be thrown out 3 days after opening. In an observation of the main dining room kitchenette refrigerator on 02/13/2023 at 12:18 PM, the following items were found: • A yogurt dated 11/03/22- with an expiration date of December 2022; • An unlabeled jug of opened apple juice; • A half of a frozen pie with no date or label; • Ice cream container, opened, unlabeled; • Two plastic condiment containers with red sauce in them, unlabeled and undated; • An unlabeled…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-02-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate hand hygiene practices during wound dressing, toileting care, and proper placement of a urinary catheter bags in accordance with infection control standards of practice for two of two (10 and 27) residents observed during care. This failed place all residents and staff at risk for potential infection. Findings included . <HAND HYGIENE> Review of the facility policy titled, Hand Hygiene Policy, revised October/2017, stated the facility followed hand hygiene protocol to break the cycle of infection and control the spread of infection/outbreaks. Hand hygiene was either with an alcohol-based gel or soap and water .all staff and volunteers who had contact with residents would follow these guidelines when there was potential contact with body fluids .before and after resident contact .and after removing gloves. RESIDENT 27 Resident 27 admitted on [DATE] and required a gastrostomy (opening to the stomach) tube for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$74,794 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $74,794 — penalty dated 2025-03-11
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-16 for 14 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $611K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505098. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-01, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.