Bothell Health Care
707 - 228th Southwest, Bothell, WA 98021 · For profit - Individual · 99 certified beds · (425) 481-8500 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $59,114 in federal fines (most recent 2026-05-01)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.7% | 14.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.7% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.0% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 70.7% | 17.7% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 2.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 9.6% | 17.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.7% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 21.8% | 22.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.8% | 15.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.2% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.5% | 82.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.4% | 19.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 14.8% | 13.4% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.79 | 1.33 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.22 | 1.52 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
59.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 477 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 75.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 190 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.59 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 44% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 59.2%CMS range 54.4–63.8 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.0%CMS range 7.3–11.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 75.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 72.1% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 75.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 95.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.2% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 6.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.4%CMS range 4.5–8.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.26 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 86.9 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.18 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.83 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.15 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.31 to 0.86 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
49 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2026-05-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision of two staff assistance and use of a mechanical lift (Hoyer) device to prevent an avoidable accident during a transfer for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for accident hazards. Resident 1 experienced harm when they had an assisted fall while being transferred by one staff person without the use of the care planned Hoyer lift device, sustained a broken distal fibula (calf bone), and required transfer to the emergency room. This failure placed residents that require mechanical lift transfer or two staff extensive assistance at risk for injury, adverse outcomes, functional decline, and diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Accidents and Supervision, revised in December 2025, showed Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents.Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, revised in December 2025, showed, It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of physical abuse when the facility failed to implement their abuse policy and procedures to conduct an immediate investigation that included resident interviews for potential abuse for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 2 & 1). In addition, the facility failed to protect Resident 2 and other residents from potential abuse when an identified nursing assistant (NA) remained in the facility after Resident 1 reported to staff that the same NA hit them on the right upper arm causing bruise, and mental anguish. These failures caused Resident 1 harm and had the potential to cause further abuse, pain, and fear for Resident 2 and other residents. Findings included . Review of the abuse policy revised on 05/2023, showed it is the policy of the facility to provide protection for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse. Definition:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent physical abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse investigations. Resident 2 entered Resident 1's room and hit them on the right side of their face with a closed fist. This failure placed residents at increased risk of injury, emotional distress, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Elopements and Wandering Residents revised on 12/2025, showed, this facility ensures that residents who exhibit wandering behavior and/or are at risk for elopement receive adequate supervision to prevent accidents and receive care in accordance with their person centered plan of care addressing the unique factors contributing to wandering or elopement risk. The policy further showed the following definitions: Wandering is random or repetitive locomotion that may be goal-directed (e.g., the person appears to be searching for something such as an exit) or non-goal directed or aimless.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). The failure to provide bath/shower for a resident who was dependent on staff for assistance placed the resident at risk for poor hygiene, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living , revised in September 2025, showed, Based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident and consistent with the resident's needs and choices, the facility must provide the necessary care and services to ensure that a resident's abilities in ADLs do not diminish unless circumstances of the individual's clinical condition demonstrates that such diminution was unavoidable. Review of the admission record printed on 03/03/2026 showed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included generalized muscle weakness. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolatedEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a therapeutic diet was provided as ordered for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for therapeutic diets. This failure had the potential to cause unwanted weight gain, a decline in medical condition, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of a Resident Information Sheet (face sheet) in the electronic health record printed on 06/11/2025, showed Resident 1 was readmitted to the facility from the hospital on [DATE] and had a diagnosis of [NAME] Syndrome (a rare disease that causes excessive appetite and overeating). Review of weight records dated 06/06/2025 showed Resident 1's weight was 268 pounds (lbs. -a unit of measurement); on 06/07/2025, 270 lbs.; and on 06/11/2025, 274 lbs. Review of Resident 1's dietary card on their lunch tray dated 06/11/2025 showed, diabetic diet (limits unhealthy fats and added sugars), small portions-sub [substitute] fruit for dessert. Observation on 06/11/2025 at 12:40 PM, showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0554 — patternAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were evaluated, assessed, received physician orders for self-medication administration, and educated to keep medications in a lockable storage for 4 of 15 residents (Residents 50, 7, 76 & 90), reviewed for self-medication administration. The failure to complete a self-administration of medication assessment and store medications in a lockable unit placed the residents at risk for medication errors, adverse reactions, and related complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage, revised in May 2024, showed that this facility would ensure all medications housed on our premises would be stored in the medication rooms to ensure security. The general guidelines included all drugs and biologicals would be stored in locked compartments. RESIDENT 50 A review of Resident 50's April 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0574 — patternThe resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the website address of the Washington State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (an advocacy group for residents in a nursing home) on the posted contact information in 4 of 4 facility areas (100-Wing, 400-Wing, across the conference room, and the library), reviewed for residents' rights. This failure placed the residents at risk of not being able to report their concerns online to the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated document titled, admission Agreement, showed Residents had the right to be informed of his or her rights and of all rules and regulations governing resident conduct and responsibilities during his or her stay in the facility. Review of the facility's undated document titled, Resident Handbook, showed information and contact information for State and local advocacy organizations, including but not limited to the State Survey Agency, the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman program and the protection and advocacy system. Further review of the handbook…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a homelike environment when residents were served their meals on trays for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 34 & 70) and signage of medical information were posted in residents' rooms for 2 of 15 residents (Residents 70 & 301), reviewed for homelike environment. These failures placed the residents at risk for a less than homelike environment and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated document titled, Resident Handbook, showed that residents have a right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and support for daily living safely. ROOM TRAYS In an observation on 3/27/2025 at 12:33 PM, showed Resident 34 was eating their lunch off a serving tray. In an observation on 03/31/2025 at 2:25 PM, showed Resident 70 was eating their lunch off a serving tray. In an interview on 03/28/2025 at 12:28 PM, Staff BB, Unit Coordinator, stated that they did not think leaving meals on the serving tray was homelike.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff document medications in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 of 10 residents (Residents 148, 28 & 8), failed to ensure medications were not handled with bare hands for 1 of 10 residents (Resident 2), and failed to ensure insulin (medication that works by lowering levels of sugar in the blood) pens were wiped with alcohol pads before use and the skin was pinched prior to insulin administration for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 20 & 19), reviewed for medication administrations. In addition, the facility failed to ensure feeding tube (enteral tube - a medical device used to provide nutrition to people who cannot obtain nutrition by mouth or need nutritional supplementation) was checked for placement or patency prior to administering medications for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 16). These failures placed the residents at risk for medication errors, unmet care needs and other negative outcomes. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods items were handled appropriately in accordance with professional standards of food safety for 1 of 3 refrigerators (Walk-In Refrigerator) and 1 of 1 Shelf (Shelf below steamer table), reviewed for food services. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 kitchen staff (Staff W) was wearing a beard net. These failures placed the residents at risk for food borne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages), cross contamination, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Date Marking for Food Safety, revised in November 2022, showed, the facility adheres to a date marking system to ensure the safety of ready to eat time/temperature control for safety food. The policy further showed, the food shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed or discarded. The marking system shall consist of the day/time of opening, and the day/time the item must be consumed or discarded. FOOD ITEMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure glucometer (device that measures the concentration of sugar in the blood) control testing reading numbers were documented accurately for 5 of 5 residents (Residents 20, 19, 92, 24 & 47), reviewed for resident records. This failure placed the residents at risk of medical complications, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Glucometer Cleaning, revised in April 2025, showed that glucometers should be cleaned after each use with Mycolio [brand name] disinfectant wipes. The document showed that glucometers and glucometer bins were cleaned weekly using Mycolio disinfectant wipes and that glucometer control testing was done in the EMAR [Electronic Medication Administration Record] by performing both low and high testing, comparing the readings to the range printed on the test strip bottle. Document (+) [plus] accurate reading (-) [minus] inaccurate reading, repeat the test, if still inaccurate, replace with a new glucometer. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases by: 1. Not having a water management program that assessed the potential growth of Legionella (a waterborne bacteria that can cause pneumonia [a lung infection]) or other waterborne pathogens (an organism that can cause disease) was completed for the decorative water fountain. 2. Touching medications with bare hands during medication administration for 1 of 10 residents (Resident 2), reviewed medication administration. 3. Not performing hand hygiene and disinfection of glucometers (device used to check blood sugar levels) for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 20, 92 & 19), reviewed for blood glucose (blood sugar) monitoring. 4. Not cleaning insulin (a hormone that helps regulate blood sugar levels) pens (administration device) prior to medication administration for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 20 & 19), reviewed for insulin administration. 5.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · E2025-04-02 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain glucometer (a device for measuring the concentration of sugar in the blood) disinfection per manufacturers' recommendations for 4 of 4 glucometers in Wing 300, reviewed for safe operating condition. This failure placed residents at risk of inaccurate blood sugar readings and potential negative outcomes. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Glucometer Disinfection, revised in May 2024, showed that glucometers were disinfected to prevent transmission of blood borne (can be spread through contamination by blood and other body fluids) diseases to residents and employees. The policy further showed that the facility would ensure that glucometers were cleaned and disinfected after each use and according to the manufacturer's instructions. The glucometers should be disinfected with a wipe pre-saturated with an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA - a federal agency that protects human and environmental health by regulating pollutants and enforcing laws) - registered healthcare…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided care and services in a manner that maintained and promoted dignity while providing meal assistance for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 70), reviewed for meal observations. This failure placed the resident at risk for a diminished self-worth and overall well-being. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated document titled, Resident Handbook included the resident bill of rights which showed that residents had the right to be treated with respect and dignity. Resident 70 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Observation and interview on 03/28/2025 at 1:00 PM, showed Staff Z, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) was standing while assisting Resident 70 with their lunch who was sitting in their wheelchair. Staff Z stated that they usually do not sit while they assisted residents with their meals. Staff Z stated that sitting when feeding a resident would be better because then the residents would not feel they are rushed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the resident and/or their representative before administering psychotropic (mind altering) medications for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 34), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident and/or their representative at risk of not being fully informed of the risks and benefits before making decisions about their medications. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated document titled, admission Agreement, showed, Consent for Medical Treatment: The resident has the right to make health care decisions, including consenting to or refusing treatment. Review of the facility's undated document titled, Resident Handbook, showed, Residents have the right to be informed by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or treatment options and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers. Review of the psychiatric progress note dated 04/17/2024 showed Resident 34 had diagnoses of Parkinson's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an advance directive (a written instruction, such as a living will or Durable Power of Attorney [DPOA] for health care [a document delegating to an agent the authority to make health care decisions in case the individual delegating the authority subsequently becomes incapable to do so]) was obtained and completed for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 70), reviewed for advance directives. This failure placed the resident and/or their representative at risk for losing their right to have their preferences honored to receive or refuse/discontinue care according to their choice. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated document titled, admission Agreement, showed that Residents/Legal Representatives have been given written materials about resident's right to accept to or refuse medical treatments as provided by state law and has been informed of resident's right to formulate Advance Directives. Review of Resident 70's Social Service History &…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (SNF ABN) and Notification of Medicare (federal health insurance program for people age [AGE] or older) Non-Coverage (NOMNC- a required form notifying the resident that their skilled services coverage was ending and would no longer be covered by their Medicare A benefits) at least two calendar days before the Medicare coverage ended for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 25 & 73), reviewed for beneficiary notification. These failures placed the residents and/or their representatives at risk of not being fully informed and losing their right to an appeals process. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated document titled, Resident Handbook, showed that the residents have the right to receive notices in writing. Further review of the document showed that the resident has the right to be informed about Medicare eligibility and coverage. Review of the undated NOMNC Form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit the resident Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Service (CMS) within the required timeframe for 1 of 22 residents (Resident 69), reviewed for transmitting MDS assessments. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.19.11, revised in October 2024, showed all Medicare and/or Medicaid-certified nursing homes and swing beds, or agents of those facilities, must transmit required MDS data records to CMS' Internet Quality Improvement and Evaluation System (iQIES). After completion of the required assessment and/or tracking records, each provider must create electronic transmission files that meet the requirements detailed in the current MDS 3.0 Data Submission Specifications. For…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR-an assessment used to identify people referred to nursing facilities with Serious Mental Illness [SMI], Intellectual Disabilities [ID]; or related conditions are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long-term care) Level I form was completed accurately and Level II PASARR referrals were made for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 55 & 34), reviewed for PASARR screening. In addition, the facility failed to complete Level I PASARR screening form for an exempted hospital discharge resident who remained in the facility for more than 30 days for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 2). These failures placed the residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate care and services for their needs and/or lacking access to specialized services for individuals with identified mental health diagnoses or disabilities. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Assessment - Coordination…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0660 — isolatedPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident centered discharge plan was in place for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 96), reviewed for discharge planning. The failure to begin the discharge planning process at admission placed the resident at risk for delayed discharge, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Discharge Planning Process, revised in May 2024, showed, If discharge to community is a goal, an active discharge care plan will be implemented and will involve the interdisciplinary team, including the resident and/or resident representative. The plan shall be documented in the electronic medical record. An active individualized discharge care plan will address .discharge destination .identified needs, such as medical, nursing, equipment, educational, or psychosocial needs. Resident 96 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 12/26/2024 showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the discharge summary was completed and included a recapitulation (overview) of the resident's stay for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 96), reviewed for discharge summary. This failure placed the resident at risk for unsafe discharge, complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Discharge Planning Process, revised in May 2024, showed, The evaluation of the resident's discharge needs and discharge plan will be completely documented on a timely basis in the clinical record. The results of the evaluation and the final discharge plan will be discussed with the resident or resident's representative. All relevant information will be provided in a discharge summary to avoid unnecessary delays in the resident's discharge or transfer . Resident 96 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the discharge Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 02/07/2025 showed Resident 96 was discharged to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement and/or provide activity plan for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 45), reviewed for activities. This failure placed the resident at risk of boredom, decreased mood, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities, revised in February 2025, showed, It is the policy of this facility to provide an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities based on their comprehensive assessment, care plan, and preferences. Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included Dementia (a medical condition affecting memory, thinking and social abilities). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 02/20/2025, showed Resident 45's preferred language was Mandarin (Chinese language) and activity preferences that included reading and keeping up with the news. Review of the activity care plan initiated on 12/28/2024, showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure consistent communication and collaboration of care occurred between the facility and hospice care for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 15), reviewed for hospice services. This failure placed the resident at risk of not receiving the necessary hospice care services, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Coordination of Hospice Services, revised in September 2024, showed the facility will maintain communication with hospice and identify, communicate, follow, and document all interventions put into place by hospice and the facility. Review of the face sheet printed on 04/01/2025 showed Resident 15 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the hospice order dated 01/30/2025, showed that Resident 15's hospice referral was made. Review of Resident 15's medical records (electronic and paper charting) did not show documentation of hospice care visit notes. In an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0699 — isolatedProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors and diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - a mental health condition triggered by a terrifying event that was either experienced or witnessed) received trauma informed care, trigger assessment, and trauma-informed care assessment in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 8, 34 & 76), reviewed for mood/behavior. These failures placed residents at risk for unidentified triggers, re-traumatization, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Trauma Informed Care, revised in May 2024, showed that it was the policy of the facility to ensure residents who are trauma survivors received culturally competent, trauma informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice. The policy showed, Each resident will be screened for a history of trauma upon admission. The policy further stated that if the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring was conducted for use of anticoagulants (medication that prevent blood clot) for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 55 & 45), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications, adverse side effects, and related complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Monitoring, revised in January 2025, showed, the facility takes a collaborative, systemic approach to medication management, including the monitoring of medications for efficacy and adverse side consequences. The policy further showed licensed nurses with periodic oversight by nurse managers shall adhere to facility policies and current standards of practice for administration and monitoring of medications. RESIDENT 55 Review of the face sheet printed on 03/28/2025 showed Resident 55 initially admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the January 2025 to March 2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately label and store drugs and/or biologicals (diverse group of medicines made from natural sources) for 1 of 2 refrigerators (Medication Storage A), reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed the residents at risk of receiving compromised and ineffective medications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage, revised in May 2024, showed that the facility would ensure all medications housed on the premises would be stored in the medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security. Review of the undated package insert document for Tubersol (tuberculin - purified protein derivative, is a combination of proteins that are used in the diagnosis of tuberculosis [a serious illness caused by a type of bacteria that mainly affects the lungs]) showed an open multi-dose vial of Tubersol which has been opened and in use for 30 days…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-04-02 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) had the required dementia (memory loss) management training upon hire for 2 of 5 staff (Staff U & Staff V), reviewed for sufficient and competent Nurse staffing. This failure placed the residents at risk for potential negative outcomes and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Required Training, Certification and Continuing Education of Nurse Aides, revised in September 2024, showed, It is the policy of this facility to comply with State and Federal regulations and requirements as they pertain to the training, certification, and continuing education of its nurse aides. STAFF U Review of the undated facility's employee record showed Staff U, CNA, was hired on 07/09/2024. It further showed no documentation that Staff U received the required dementia management training. STAFF V Review of the undated facility's employee record showed Staff V, CNA, was hired on 04/23/2024. It further showed no documentation that Staff V received the required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-07 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely information about medical appointment for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1), reviewed for planning and implementation of care. The failure to notify the resident's representative of Resident 1's medical appointment led to the cancellation of the medical procedure and prevented the resident's representative the ability to exercise their right to make an informed decision. Findings included . Review of the face sheet showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 09/05/2024 showed that Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the nursing progress notes dated 09/15/2024 showed that Resident 1 was on alert for increased confusion. Review of the communication care plan initiated on 09/09/2024 showed Resident 1 required supervision in all…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-20 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a summary/copy of the baseline care plan to the residents and/or their representatives for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 334, 32, 57 & 183), reviewed for baseline care plan. This failure resulted in the residents not being informed of their initial plan for delivery of care services and placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Baseline Care Plan, revised in May 2023, showed that a written summary of the baseline care plan shall be provided to the resident and their representative in a language that the resident/representative can understand. The summary shall include, at a minimum, the following: the initial goals of the resident, a summary of the resident's medications and dietary instructions and any services and treatments to be administered by the facility and personnel acting on behalf of the facility. RESIDENT 334 Resident 334 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-20 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing form was accurately completed with the census, actual number of staff and the hours worked for each shift for 4 of 5 days reviewed for sufficient and competent staffing. This failure placed the residents and residents' representatives at risk of not being fully informed of the current staffing levels. Findings included . Review of the facility's form titled, Report of Nursing Staff Directly Responsible for Resident Care, showed that the forms had no actual number of staff and the hours worked on the nurse staffing form on 01/17/2024, 01/18/2024, 01/19/2024 and 01/20/2024. Further review of the forms showed the census was not written on the form on 01/18/2024, 01/19/2024 and 01/20/2024. Observations on 01/17/2024 at 8:44 AM, on 01/18/2024 at 8:49 AM, on 01/19/2024 at 12:28 PM and on 01/20/2024 at 11:05 AM, showed the facility's daily nursing staffing form posted on the wall by Director of Nursing Service's (DNS) office did not display the actual number of nursing staff and hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to appropriately label and store drugs and/or biologicals (diverse group of medicines made from natural sources) and failed to ensure expired medications were disposed of timely in accordance with current accepted professional standards for 2 of 4 medication carts (300 & 400 Hall Medication Carts), reviewed for medication storage. In addition, the facility failed to maintain proper temperature for 2 of 2 refrigerators in the medication storage room (Medication Storage Room Refrigerator A & B). These failures placed the residents at risk for receiving compromised, ineffective, and expired medications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Labeling of Medications and Biologicals, revised in May 2023, showed, All medications and biologicals will be labeled in accordance with applicable federal and state requirements and current accepted pharmaceutical principles and practices. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage, revised in May 2023, showed the temperatures are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices for hand hygiene and/or proper use of gloves were followed during peri-care (cleaning of private areas), wound care, and medication administration for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 42, 23 & 48), and failed to do hand hygiene during meal observations for 2 of 2 staff (Staff M & T), reviewed for infection control. These failures placed the residents at risk for facility acquired or healthcare-associated infections and related complications. Findings Included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene, revised in May 2023, showed that the use of towelettes (antimicrobial-impregnated wipes) are not a substitute for using an Alcohol-Based Hand Rub (ABHR) or antimicrobial soap. It also showed that the use of gloves does not replace hand washing and if the task required gloves, perform hand hygiene prior to donning (putting on) gloves, and immediately after removing gloves. HAND HYGIENE AND GLOVE USE RESIDENT 42 Observation and interview on 01/18/2024 at 1:49 PM, showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-01-20 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — patternRegularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct routine maintenance to ensure bed rails/side rails were safe to use for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 42, 47, 5 & 1), reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed the residents at risk for injury and/or entrapment. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Proper Use of Side Rails, revised in May 2023, showed the facility was to check the rails regularly to make sure they are still installed correctly and have not shifted or loosened over time. RESIDENT 42 Resident 42 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included aftercare following joint replacement surgery and muscle weakness. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) dated 12/28/2023, showed Resident 42 was cognitively intact. Review of the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan intervention, revised on 01/02/2024, showed Resident 42 required two-person extensive assist for bed mobility (moving in bed), and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-20 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's personal clothing were kept safe from loss/theft and failed to follow their process for missing/lost items for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 18), reviewed for personal property. This failure placed the resident at risk for decreased sense of security and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Personal Belongings, revised in May 2023, showed that the facility will exercise reasonable care for the protection of the resident's property from loss or theft. If an item is on the inventory sheet (the list that has resident's belongings) and is lost the facility will reimburse the resident. Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident and Family Grievances, revised on 10/31/2023, showed that all staff involved in the grievance investigation or resolution should make prompt efforts to resolve the grievance and return the grievance form to the grievance official. Prompt efforts include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegation of abuse was reported to the State Agency within the required time frame for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 44), reviewed for abuse allegation. This failure placed the resident at risk for potential unidentified mistreatment and lack of protection due to unrecognized abuse. Findings included . According to the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, dated October 2015 (sixth edition), required the nursing home employee (or other mandated reporter) to make a report if they had reasonable cause to believe abuse, neglect, abandonment, mistreatment, personal and/or financial exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property has occurred. It also showed, Federal law requires the facility to report all allegations of abuse or neglect. This would include taking seriously any allegation from residents or others with a history of making allegations. Review of the facility's policy titled, Compliance with Reporting Allegations of Abuse,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-20 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 44), reviewed for abuse investigation. This failure placed the resident at risk for repeated incidents, unidentified abuse, and inappropriate corrective actions. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, revised in May 2023, showed that when a suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of neglect or exploitation occur, an immediate investigation was warranted. Investigations includes identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegations. Focusing the investigation on determining if abuse, neglect, exploitation, exploitation, and/or mistreatment had occurred, the extent, and cause and providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation. Resident 44 admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-20 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written transfer/discharge notice to the residents/representatives describing the reason for transfers for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 63 & 21), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk for not having an opportunity to make informed decision about transfers/discharge. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer and Discharge [including discharge Against Medical Advice], revised in May 2023, showed that for emergency transfers/discharges, the facility should provide transfer notice as soon as practicable to resident and representative. The policy further showed that the facility should document assessment findings and other relevant information regarding the transfer in the medical record. RESIDENT 63 Resident 63 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the progress note dated 02/04/2023, showed Resident 63's representative had requested that Resident 63 be transferred to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-20 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bed-hold notices were provided at the time of transfer to the hospital for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 63 & 21), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk of lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed while in the hospital. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Hold, revised in May 2023, showed that prior to and at the time of transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave the facility will provide to the resident and/or the representative written notice, which specifies the duration of the bed hold policy. RESIDENT 63 Resident 63 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the progress note dated 02/04/2023, showed Resident 63 was sent to the hospital for altered mental status. Review of Resident 63's clinical record did not show that a bed-hold notice was provided to Resident 63 and/or their representative. During a joint record review and interview on 01/19/2024 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement care plans for 2 of 17 residents (Residents 23 & 53), reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The failure to develop and/or implement care plans for dental care, dentures, and incontinence care placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, revised in May 2023, showed that the comprehensive care plan will describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The care plan policy also showed, Any services that would otherwise be furnished, but are not provided due to the resident's exercise of his or her right to refuse treatment. RESIDENT 23 DENTAL Resident 23 readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the significant change in status Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 11/13/2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide nail care and denture care for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 44 & 53), reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). This failure placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene, decreased self-esteem, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, revised in May 2023, showed that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. Review of the facility's policy titled, Providing Nail Care, revised in May 2023, showed that routine cleaning and inspection of nails will be provided during scheduled showers and as needed. RESIDENT 44 Resident 44 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included left hemiplegia (left sided weakness). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 01/04/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-20 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and provide risks and benefits for bed rail/side rail use to meet the needs of 1 of 4 residents (Resident 5), reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed the resident at risk for injury and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Proper Use of Side Rails, revised in May 2023, showed that the facility shall assess the resident for .risks associated with the use of side/bed rails. The side rail policy also showed that the facility shall obtain informed consent from the resident, or the resident representative for the use of bed rails, prior to installation/use. Resident 5 readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 01/02/2024 showed Resident 5 required partial/moderate assistance for rolling left and right in bed, and for lying to sitting in bed. Observations on 01/16/2024 AM at 10:16 AM and on 01/18/2024 AM at 8:46…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-20 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to coordinate services for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 23) who had identified dental needs. The failure to follow through and coordinate dental services placed the resident at risk for dental pain, dental complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Dental Services, revised in May 2023, showed, It is the policy of this facility . to assist residents in obtaining routine . and emergency dental care. The dental policy also showed that the emergency dental services includes services needed to treat any problem of the oral cavity that required immediate attention by a dentist. Resident 23 readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the significant change in status Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 11/13/2023, showed Resident 23 had obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. Review of Resident 23's January 2024 Medication Administration Record, showed an order for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-20 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate use of antibiotic medication (used to treat infection) was followed for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 280), and failed to ensure standardized tools and criteria were utilized for antibiotic stewardship program (such as Loeb Minimum Criteria [minimum set of signs/symptoms used to determine whether to treat an infection with antibiotics] and/or SBAR [Situation, Background, Assessment, and Recommendation - a toolkit that helps staff/prescribing clinicians communicate about suspected UTIs [Urinary Tract Infections-bladder infection] and facilitates appropriate antibiotic prescribing) to promote appropriate use of antibiotics, reduce the risk of unnecessary antibiotic use, and decrease the development of adverse side effects and antibiotic resistance. These failures placed the residents at risk for potential adverse outcomes associated with the inappropriate and/or unnecessary use of antibiotics. Findings included . Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure reported concerns were addressed and investigated timely for 3 of 8 residents (Residents 5, 7 & 9), reviewed for grievances. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Record review of the grievance policy dated 05/2023, showed the following policy explanation and guidelines: 4. A resident may voice grievances with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished, the behavior of staff and other residents, and other concerns regarding their LTC [Long Term Care] facility stay. 8. Grievances may be voiced in the following forum: (a). Verbal complaint to a staff member. 10. Procedure: (b). The staff member receiving the grievance will take any immediate actions needed to prevent further potential violations of any resident right. RESIDENT 5 Review of a resident interview form dated 09/18/2023, showed Resident 5 informed Staff C, Social Service Director, that they would prefer not to have agency…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-06 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure possible allegations of abuse and/or neglect were investigated for 1 of 8 residents (Resident 10), reviewed for abuse/neglect investigations. This failure placed the resident at risk for unidentified abuse and/or neglect, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 10 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the significant change in status Minimum Data Set assessment (an assessment tool) dated 07/24/2023 showed the resident had moderately impaired thinking, was able to make needs known, and required assist for care needs. Review of an investigation summary dated 09/21/2023, showed on 09/19/2023, the resident was interviewed for any care concerns when an allegation of abuse was made by another resident in the facility. Review of the interview form dated 09/19/2023, revealed Resident 10 was questioned by Staff C, Social Service Director, on how they were treated by staff. The resident expressed concerns with staff that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-10-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the refrigerator, freezer, and dry storage, were labeled, dated when opened, and closed shut. The facility also failed to separate clean work areas from soiled work areas and keep the kitchen clean from debris and garbage. These failures had the potential to affect all 81 residents in the facility who consumed food from the kitchen. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Monitoring of Cooler/Freezer Temperature, dated 11/2022, documented Refrigerated food shall be labeled, dated, and monitored so that it is used by the use by date, frozen, or discarded. On 10/10/2022 at 8:23 AM, the following observations in the kitchen were made with, and verified by the Dietary Manager, Staff C: 1. The dry storage room contained one bag of pasta that was not labeled and dated. It also contained one bag of cake mix that was not labeled, dated, or closed shut. 2. The walk-in refrigerator contained one bag of salmon, teriyaki chicken, beef, ham, a container of soup and a block of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-10-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired medications and laboratory supplies were properly discarded to prevent the potential use of the medications and supplies in 1 of 2 medication storage rooms observed. This failure placed the residents at risk to receive ineffective medications, use compromised laboratory supplies, and possibly experience adverse side effects. Findings included . Observation of Station B Medication Room on 10/11/2022 at 2:48 PM, revealed the following expired medications: - One bottle of Gabapentin (for nerve pain) Sol [solution] 250/5 ml [milliliter] 300 cc [cubic centimeters] bottle, 250 cc left in bottle, with an expiration date of 05/2022. - Two bottles of Loperamide Hydrochloride (for diarrhea) Oral solution 1 mg [milligrams] per 7.5 ml (4 fl. oz. - 120 ml) with an expiration date of 05/2022. - One Combivent Respimat inhalation spray 20 mcg [micrograms]/100 mcg per actuation 120 metered doses with an expiration date of 08/2022. - Four bottles of Docusate Sodium (for constipation) 200 mg capsules one with 30 tablets with an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-10-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the oxygen (O2) nasal canula (a thin tube inserted into the nose to deliver O2) was dated and in a plastic bag when not in use for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 66) reviewed for respiratory care. This failure placed the resident at risk for infection and related complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Concentrator, dated 05/2022, revealed, Care of the resident-Cannulas should be changed weekly and dated .Document in the resident's clinical record to change tubing/bag weekly and date the tubing. Observation on 10/10/2022 at 10:44 AM, revealed Resident 66's O2 tubing that was connected to the concentrator by his bedside was not dated. The tubing was also not dated or bagged that was on his wheelchair. Observation on 10/10/2022 at 4:21 PM revealed that Resident 66's O2 tubing that was connected to the concentrator by his bedside was not dated. The oxygen tank located on the resident's wheelchair, had tubing that was also not dated, and the tubing was lying across the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2025-04-02 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespreadConduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility assessment (document describing resident population and needs to determine staff and other resources necessary to competently care for residents) was updated to include and consider specific staffing needs for each resident unit/each shift and to identify contracts or agreements with third parties such as Hospice (specialized care for residents requiring comfort care) and Hemodialysis (treatment for residents whose kidneys are failing) services. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Facility Assessment, revised in May 2024, showed, The facility will conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its resident competently during both day-to-day operation and emergencies. It also showed the facilities resources that included contracts, memorandums of understanding [MOUs], or other agreements with third parties to provide services .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$59,114 in federal fines across 2 penalties.
- $16,350 — penalty dated 2026-05-01
- $42,764 — penalty dated 2023-10-06
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BINGMAN, ARTHUR | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 50% | since 08/01/2010 |
| BINGMAN, JULIE | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | 50% | since 08/01/2010 |
| ADAMI, DANIELLE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/26/2019 |
| ASHLEY, HELEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/09/2018 |
| BABINEAU, JESSICA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| BEHNE, RORI | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/21/2012 |
| CHAM, ANSUMANA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/26/2024 |
| DOUGLAS, MARY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/05/2026 |
| EKSTROM, PETER | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/26/2022 |
| GUEVARA, WILMA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/31/2023 |
| KILKER, DANIEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/22/2018 |
| LEMUS, GEORGINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2026 |
| MANGIALARDI, DANIEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/06/2024 |
| STOLARCZYK, LISA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505431. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-04-02, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.