No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cashmere Post Acute

817 Pioneer Avenue, Cashmere, WA 98815 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 95 certified beds · (509) 782-1251 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (509) 782-1251 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Apr 2026Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$15,340 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (49) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,340 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-15)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
303 Cottage Ave · (509) 782-1541 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
119 Cottage Ave · (509) 782-2717 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
702 Pioneer Ave · (509) 782-1900 · Call to confirm hours
Park
405 Pioneer Ave · (509) 782-3513 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.0%14.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.8%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.5%1.0%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.6%1.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.7%17.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.6%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.0%17.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.6%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine70.1%93.8%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.4%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.9%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table29.8%15.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.3%1.3%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine72.8%82.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.3%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.4%13.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.981.331.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.291.521.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 90 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.21U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 70 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.21 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 25% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 61% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.4%CMS range 33.0–51.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.4%CMS range 8.5–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge54.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.2%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 5.3–12.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.191.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.94
RN hours/ resident / day
0.07
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.57
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.59
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.72
RN hoursweekends
37.2%
Total nursing turnover
36.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 92.2 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.94 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.57 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.78 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.03 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-03)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-13)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

49 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 38 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent an avoidable accident by ensuring the plan of care regarding transfers was followed for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accidents. The failure to safely transfer Resident 1 using two-person assist resulted in an assisted fall and Resident 1 experienced harm when they sustained a facial laceration (a skin wound usually caused by a sharp object or blunt trauma) requiring evaluation and intervention by the local emergency room (ER). Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Fall Prevention Program, revised on 09/04/2023, defined a fall as an event in which an individual unintentionally comes to rest on the ground, floor, or other level. Review of the facility policy titled Fall Risk Assessment, revised on 09/04/2023, showed the facility would provide an environment that is free from accident hazards, and provide supervision and assistive devices to each resident to prevent avoidable accidents. <Resident 1>…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-03 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — widespread
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a current Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA) certificate required to perform laboratory tests within the facility. This failure placed residents at risk for substandard care, delayed diagnosis and incorrect medical treatment. Findings included. During an observation and concurrent interview on [DATE] at 1:55 PM, Staff A, Administrator, stated they had noticed the facility's CLIA certification had expired on [DATE] (an elapsed period of 9 months and 10 days). Staff A stated that they recalled paying the renewal fee for the previous year. During an interview on [DATE] at 10:03 AM, Staff A stated they were aware that the CLIA certificate was expired and stated they were ultimately responsible for the compliance of the facility's certifications. Staff A stated their quality assurance team was responsible for tracking financial stuff to ensure such fees were paid. Reference: WAC 388-97-1620 (2)(b)(i)

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-03 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 residents (Residents 81, 2, and 77) were reviewed for gradual dose reduction (GDRs- the slow, step-by-step process of decreasing a residents medication overtime), or provide a clinical rationale for its contraindication as required for the use of psychotropic medication (drugs that alter brain function used to treat mental health conditions) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents who used psychotropic medications at risk for adverse side effects (ASEs) which could negatively impact their overall health and quality of life. Findings included .Record review of a facility policy titled Use of Psychotropic Medications revised 01/2025 showed, residents who use psychotropic drugs shall receive gradual dose reductions unless clinically contra-indicated, to discontinue the use of these drugs. Resident 81 Review of the resident's medical record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implementation of care plan interventions to prevent resident-to-resident altercations for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 48, 38, and 3) reviewed for accidents. This failure placed the residents at risk for potential verbal and physical abuse, serious pain, injury, and emotional distress. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident 77), who utilized a transfer pole, had a process in place to ensure appropriate placement of equipment for safety and to mitigate the risk of entrapment. This failure placed Resident 77 at risk for injuries if improperly placed. Findings included .Review of a policy titled, Accidents and Supervision, dated 2025, showed the resident environment would be as free from accident hazards as is possible. Each resident would receive adequate supervision (interventions and means of mitigating risk of an accident) to prevent accidents that included identifying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-03 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, comfortable and sanitary environment was maintained for 1 of 1 kitchen areas (dishwasher room) and 3 of 4 utility rooms (West clean and soiled utility rooms, and the South clean utility room) reviewed for environment. This failure placed the residents at risk for potential accidents and not feeling safe/secure with their environment. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Safe and Homelike Environment, dated 2025, showed .In accordance with residents rights the facility will provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. Maintenance services will be provided as necessary to maintain a sanitary, orderly and comfortable environment and will report any unresolved environmental concerns to the Administrator . During an observation of the Kitchen (dishwasher room) on 03/30/2026 at 9:45 AM showed: The floor beneath and surrounding the dishwasher exhibited significant peeling, chipping, and erosion of the protective sealant, exposing an un-cleanable concrete surface…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received dignified care and services by ensuring delivered care from their preference of female caregivers for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 79) reviewed for resident rights. This failure placed the resident at risk for compromised dignity, diminished self-worth, decreased self-esteem, and feelings of embarrassment. Findings included Resident 79 Review of the medical record showed Resident 79 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include dementia ( a decline in mental abilities, such as memory, thinking, and reasoning, that interferes with daily life), and diabetes ( a chronic condition where blood sugar levels are too high because the body does not make enough insulin or cannot use it properly). The comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident 79 required the assistance of one staff member for toileting, showering/bathing, and touching assistance for upper and lower dressing. The assessment showed Resident 79's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 residents (Resident 100) reviewed for urinary (the body's processes, organs, or functions related to the productions, storage, and discharge or urine) catheter, were fully informed of their care. This failure placed the resident at risk of poor understanding in their health care decisions and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the undated facility policy titled, Resident Rights, showed the facility will inform the resident both orally and in writing, of their rights and responsibilities in a language that the resident understands. Review of the medical records showed Resident 100 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include diabetes (a chronic condition where the body cannot properly manage blood sugar levels), lymphoma (a type of blood cancer that affects the immune system), kidney stone and acute kidney failure (a serious condition where the kidneys lose their ability to filter waste products,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 48 and 38) reviewed for resident-to-resident altercations with Resident 3. This failure placed the residents at risk for continued abuse, injury, and emotional distress. Findings included. Review of a policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 2023, showed the facility would develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and exploitation of residents. Resident 48Review of the medical record showed Resident 48 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including dementia with agitation, Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions), and anxiety. The 01/05/2026 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 48 required substantial/maximal assistance of one staff member for activities of daily living [(ADLs) activities related to personal care]. The assessment also showed Resident 48 had a severely impaired cognition (the mental action or process…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse prevention policy in the areas of identification, investigation, protection, and reporting for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 48 and 38) reviewed for altercations with Resident 3. This failure placed the residents at risk for continued unidentified abuse, fear, and dissatisfaction with their living situation.Findings included. Review of a policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 2023, showed the facility would develop and implement written policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. New employees and existing staff would receive education inducing identifying abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation, such as physical or psychosocial indicators; the reporting process for abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation, and understanding behavioral symptoms that may increase the risk of abuse and neglect such as aggressive reactions of residents, wandering, and outbursts or yelling out. This included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an incident of abuse was reported to the State Agency as required for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 48) reviewed for an altercation with Resident 3. This failure placed the residents at risk for additional/continued abuse.Findings included. Review of a policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 2023, showed the facility would have written procedures that included reporting of alleged violations to the administrator, State Agency, adult protective services, and all other required agencies within specified timeframes: immediately, but not greater than two hours after the allegation was made if the allegation involved abuse or serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the allegation did not involve abuse and there was no serious bodily injury. The administrator would follow up with government agencies to confirm the initial report was received and to report the results of the investigation when final, within five working days of the incident. Resident 48Review of the medical record showed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an incident of abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 48) reviewed for an altercation with Resident 3. This failure placed the residents at risk for further unidentified and/or further abuse.Findings included. Review of a policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, dated 2023, showed an immediate investigation was warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect, or exploitation, or report of abuse, neglect or exploitation occurred. The investigation process included identifying staff responsible for the investigation, identifying and interviewing involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others that might have knowledge of the allegation, and providing complete and thorough documentation of the investigation. Resident 48Review of the medical record showed Resident 48 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including vascular dementia (a decline in thinking skills caused by condition that block or reduce blood flow to the brain, damaging brain tissue),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 38 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of bed hold (holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident is absent from the facility) at the time of transfer to the hospital for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 10) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk of not having the necessary information to make an informed decision regarding their ability to return to the facility.Findings included. Review of a policy titled, Bed Hold Notice, dated 2025, showed the facility would provide written information to the resident and/or their representative regarding bed hold practices both well in advance, and at the time of a transfer for hospitalization or therapeutic leave (a planned temporary absence from the facility for non-medical reasons). Review of the medical record showed Resident 10 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (permanent kidney failure where kidney function is less than 10% and they can no longer function on their own), diabetes (a condition of having too much…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews ([PASARR], an assessment to ensure individuals with serious mental illness [SMI] or intellectual/developmental disabilities [ID/DD] were not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) were accurately completed prior to admission for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 81 ) and updated when new SMIs were identified. and had the required Level II (a comprehensive evaluation by the appropriate state-designated authority) referral if residents had a positive Level I (a pre-screening evaluation for identifying SMI/ID/DD) PASARR for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 3) reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed the residents at risk of not receiving the mental health care and services appropriate for their needs. Findings Included . Review of the facility policy titled Coordination with PASRR Program, dated 2025, showed all applicants to the facility would have a Level I PASAAR for SMI, ID/DD, and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure fluids were readily available and provided to 1 of 3 residents (Resident 88) and to identify and monitor skin bruising for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 79) reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed the residents at risk for excessive thirst, dehydration, further skin injury and serious adverse health conditions. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Provision of Quality Care, dated 2025, showed the facility would ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plans, and the residents' choices. Resident 88 Review of the medical record showed Resident 88 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including hemiplegia and hemiparesis (complete paralysis and weakness on one side of the body) following a stroke (a medical emergency that occurs when blood flow to the brain is blocked or a vessel bursts, causing rapid brain cell…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-03 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was a trauma survivor received culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice by not identifying triggers (a stimulus that causes a reaction, often an emotional or physical response) regarding a resident history of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a mental health condition triggered by experiencing or witnessing a terrifying, life-threatening or traumatic event) for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 81) reviewed for trauma-informed care .This failure placed the resident at risk for unidentified triggers and re-traumatization. Findings included . Record review of the facility policy titled Trauma-Informed Care, dated 2026, showed: .The facility will recognize how trauma affects individuals through evaluation and identification of triggers during the admissions process. The facility will develop an appropriate plan of care and interventions based upon the residents' triggers and will modify the plan of care for any changes in behavior . Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were destroyed in 1 of 1 medication room and failed to ensure refrigerated medications were stored at proper temperatures in 1 of 1 medication refrigerator. These failures placed residents at risk of receiving medications that could cause unintended outcomes due to improper storage and compromised efficacy. Findings Included. Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Medication Storage, showed to ensure all medications would be stored according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation and security. During an observation on 04/01/2026 at 9:37 AM, the facility medication room showed the following expired supplies and medications were identified: Three port access kits (sterile, all-in-one kit that contains all necessary components to safely access an implanted venous access device [port] for medications or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-13 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a designated Infection Preventionist (IP) who worked at least part-time at the facility and was responsible for the facility's Infection Control and Prevention Program (IPCP), including implementation of infection prevention measures to prevent the spread of communicable diseases. These failures placed the residents at risk for transmission of infectious disease and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the undated policy titled, Infection Preventionist, showed the infection preventionist was employed on site and at least part time. They were scheduled with enough time to properly assess, develop, implement, monitor, and manage the IPCP, address training requirements, and participate in required committees such as Quality Improvement and Performance Improvement (QAPI). Review of the Facility Assessment (FA), dated 09/20/2024, showed the need for an IP to develop and regularly update infection control protocols, personal protective equipment availability, and vaccination availability. The FA did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-13 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan, within 48 hours of admission, that documented resident-specific goals and treatment plans for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 48, 196, and 9) reviewed for baseline care plan. Failure to develop a baseline care plan placed the residents at risk of not receiving continuity of care and resident centered care needs. Findings included . Review of an undated policy titled Baseline Care Plan, showed the facility would develop and implement a baseline care plan for each resident that included the instructions needed to provide effective and person-centered care of the resident that met professional standards of quality of care. The baseline care plan would be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission and it was to include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the resident, including initial goals based on admission orders, physician orders, dietary orders, therapy services, social services, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) store Potentially Hazardous Food (PHF, food that requires time/temperature controlled to limit the growth of bacteria) and dry goods that did not have the proper labels and dates for food safety tracking for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed, 2) adequately disinfected food preparation areas to prevent cross contamination (harmful spread of diseases) for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed. These failures placed residents at an increased risk for food borne illnesses. Findings included . Review of the Washington State Retail Food Code [PHONE NUMBER]6(1)(2)(a,b)(3)(4), dated March 1, 2022 showed ready-to-eat or refrigerated, time/temperature control for food safety must be clearly marked, at the time the original container is opened in a food establishment and if the food is held for more than twenty-four hours, to indicate the date or day by which the food must be consumed on the premises. Prepared foods must have the date or day of preparation, with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's right to choose important aspects of their life, including frequency of showers and meal preferences for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 87 and 22) reviewed for choices. This failure disallowed Resident 87 the opportunity to increase their weekly showers and Resident 22 the right to dietary preferences. Findings included . Review of an undated policy titled, Resident Rights, showed the resident has the right to, and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice. <Resident 87> Review of the medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include bi-polar disorder (a mental illness that causes extreme mood swings, along with changes in energy, sleep, thinking and behavior), and personality disorder (long-term patterns or behaviors and inner experiences that differ significantly from what is expected). The 11/20/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain confidentiality of medical conditions through posting of signs in a Resident's room for 1 of 7 residents (Resident 84) reviewed for resident's rights. Posting a sign that identified a medical condition, prevented protection of residents' right to privacy of a medical condition. Findings included . Review of the resident's medical records showed they admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects a person's thoughts, feelings, and behaviors). The 11/29/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 84 ' s cognition was severely impaired. An observation on 01/06/25 at 2:31 PM, showed a laminated sign with bold black lettering on the wall above Resident 84's bed that stated, I have schizophrenia, I come in and out of reality (not from drugs), I'm also blind feed me half meals, I love my room cool and love tons of water. During an interview on 01/09/2025 at 1:23 PM, Staff I,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a sanitary and homelike environment for 1 of 1 shower room reviewed for environment. This failure placed residents at risk for not having a comfortable and homelike experience during showers. Findings included . Review of the undated policy titled, Resident Rights, showed the resident had the right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including treatment and support for safe daily living. <Shower Room> An observation and interview on 01/09/2025 at 8:50 AM, showed the shower room had a staff desk, desk chair, and cabinet across from the entrance door, against the adjacent wall. The top of the desk had a laptop and computer tablet, a clipboard of resident names for bathing/showering, tape dispenser, and a pen. The cabinet top contained a notebook, a personal large pink jug, half full of clear fluid, and a black shaker cup. The top shelf of the cabinet had a pink cell phone, an Apple watch, a personal large silver drink tumbler, a small red and white gift bag, and an open box of tissues. The wall above…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue a written notice of bed hold (holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident was absent from the facility) at the time of hospital transfer for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 27 and 58), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed and monetary charges associated with the bed hold while in the hospital. Findings included . Review of the undated facility policy titled Bed Hold Prior to Transfer, showed the facility would provide written information to the resident/resident representative prior to transferring to the hospital. The written information would include the duration of the bed-hold, reserve bed payment, and facility policies regarding bed-hold periods to include permitting residents to return to the facility. <Resident 27> Review of Resident 27's medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review [(PASARR) a process to determine if a potential nursing home resident had mental health/intellectual disability needs which required further assessment/treatment] assessment accurately reflected residents' mental health conditions for 3 of 6 residents (Resident 51, 55, and 84) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a PASARR was completed prior to admission for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 9) reviewed for PASARR screening on admissions. These failures placed residents at risk for inappropriate nursing home placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health needs. Findings included . Record review of an undated policy titled, Resident Assessment - Coordination with PASARR Program, showed the Social Services Director (SSD) was responsible to ensure all applicants to the facility were screened for serious mental disorders or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive Care Plans (CPs) for one of seven residents (Resident 27) whose CPs were reviewed. The failure to develop and/or implement comprehensive CP interventions left residents at risk for unmet care needs and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Resident 27> Review of Resident 27's medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had medically complex diagnoses including a heart condition that could cause fluid in the lungs. The comprehensive assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident 27's cognition was intact and able to make decisions regarding their care. During a concurrent observation and interview on 1/08/2025 at 2:24 PM, Resident 27 stated he had not worn their pulmonary vest in a long time and staff had not asked them about it nor documenting the use of their inhaler. Review of the medical record showed an 11/18/2024 physician's order directing staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a process of monitoring daily fluid intake for residents with a physician's order for daily fluid restriction for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 196) reviewed for quality of care. Additionally, the facility failed to identify and provide needed care and services for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 4) reviewed for positioning. These failures placed the residents at risk for health complications and poor clinical outcomes. Findings included . Review of an undated policy titled, Fluid Restriction, showed the nurse would obtain and verify the physician's order for a fluid restriction that included the breakdown of the amount of fluid per 24 hours, to be divided between the food and nutrition department and the nursing department. The fluid intake would be recorded on the medication record. Water would not be provided at the bedside unless calculated into the daily total fluid restriction. <Fluid Restriction> <Resident 196> Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective pain management program for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 51) reviewed for pain management. This failed practice placed the residents at risk for unmanaged pain and emotional distress. Findings included . Review of an undated policy titled, Pain Management, showed the facility must ensure a pain management program was provided to residents that was consistent with professional standards of practice, in accordance with the comprehensive, person-centered care plan, and the resident's goals and preferences. Pharmacological interventions would follow a systemic approach for selecting medications to treat pain. The facility would consider administering medication around the clock instead of as needed (PRN) or combining longer acting medications with PRN medications for breakthrough pain. Opioids (prescription pain medications like oxycodone) would be prescribed and dosed in accordance with current professional standards of practice and manufacturers' guidelines to optimize their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. Two medication errors were identified for 2 of 10 residents (Residents 345 and 8) observed during 26 medication administration opportunities that resulted in an error rate of 7.69%. Errors in medication administration had the potential to place residents at risk for not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medication and possible adverse side effects. Findings included . Review of the undated policy titled, Insulin Pen, [a pre-filled disposable device containing (insulin - medication to control blood sugar in the blood)] showed when the insulin pen needle was inserted into the skin, the plunger (button) was to be depressed and held into the skin for six to 10 seconds and then removed from the skin. Review of the Instructions for use for an insulin pen by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration revised 07/2023 stated to insert the needle into the skin, press plunger all the way down, and continue to hold the plunger and slowly count to six prior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were removed from use for 2 of 4 medication carts (South and North) and 1 of 4 medication carts (East), and 1 of 2 wound carts were secured when unsupervised. Additionally, the facility failed to follow Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance for temperature monitoring of vaccines in 1 of 1 medication storage refrigerator located in the medication storage room. These failures placed the residents at risk for receiving expired medication and/or experiencing compromised or ineffective medications and vaccines and access to potentially harmful medications and negative health outcomes. Findings included . Review of the undated policy titled, Medication Storage, showed all medications and biological's would be stored and locked and under proper temperature control. The policy also showed the medication carts, when not under direct supervision, must be locked. Review of the CDC guidance titled, Vaccine Storage and Handling, dated 04/03/2024, showed to ensure safety of vaccines, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective Infection Control and Prevention Program (IPCP) including implementation of infection prevention measures to mitigate the spread of infection in the areas of hand hygiene for 1 of 1 staff (Staff Q) during dining service, cleaning of equipment for 8 of 8 staff (Staff W, Y, S, V, T, U, AA, and BB) during transfers with a mechanical lift, wound care for 1 of 1 staff (Staff C) while performing a dressing change, enhanced barrier precautions (a set of infection control measures that use gowns and gloves to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms) for 7 of 7 staff (Staff EE, L, CC, FF, GG, HH, and N) during high contact resident care, transmission-based precautions (additional infection control precautions used in healthcare to prevent the spread of disease) for 2 of 2 staff (Staff U, and AA) while in an isolation room, and food service for 4 of 4 meal carts (Main, North, East, and West) during meal service. These failures…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-17 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an incident involving a missing resident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for elopement (when a resident leaves the premises or a safe area without authorization or appropriate supervision). The failure to complete a thorough investigation placed the resident at risk for re-elopement and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the resident's medical records showed they were admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include an infection to their right lower extremity and a substance use disorder (a medical condition that is defined by the inability to control the use of a particular substance or substances despite harmful consequences). The 11/27/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 1's cognition was intact and they were independent for transfers and walking. Review of Resident 1's 12/04/2024 incident investigation showed Resident 1 left the facility at around 8:00 AM unsupervised and without the staff's knowledge, nor did the resident sign out.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received substance use disorder (SUD, a medical condition that is defined by the inability to control the use of a particular substance or substances despite harmful consequences) assessments and interventions for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) reviewed for elopement (when a resident leaves the premises without authorization or necessary supervision to do so). Additionally, the facility failed to timely implement all aspects of their elopement process when Resident 1 eloped from the facility twice. These failed practices placed residents at risk for unidentified risk factors and preventable accidents. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Safety for Residents with Substance Use Disorder, dated 2024, showed residents would be assessed for risks, including the potential to leave the facility without notification, and use of illegal/prescription drugs to include a Care Plan (CP) with increased monitoring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-27 · tag F0572 — isolated
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1) and/or their representative was informed of an increase in their monthly financial responsibility before charging the debit card on file. This deficient practice placed residents at risk of financial hardship and potential loss of other benefits. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of left hip fracture, osteoporosis, and severe obesity. Review of the comprehensive assessment, dated 07/03/2024, showed Resident 1 had intact cognition, required the assistance of two people for bed mobility, personal cares and required the use of a mechanical lift for transfers. Review of the admission Agreement, signed by Resident 1 on 04/21/2022, showed residents .will be notified about any rate changes at least thirty (30) days in advance. Review of the medical record showed the facility received written notification, dated 11/25/2023, from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-15 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 5 nursing assistants registered (P, Q, R, S and T) met competency requirements defined under State Law, for license and certification. This failure placed residents at risk to receive care from an unlicensed staff. Findings included . Record review of Staff P's employee files, showed they were hired on 10/24/2022 as a hospitality assistant. Documentation in the employee file showed Staff P had completed their competency course for the nursing assistant certified (NAC) class on 03/01/2023 and began working in the facility as a Nursing Assistant Registered (NAR). However, they had not completed the nursing assistant competency test for certification within the required four months as per the regulation. Record review of Staff Q's employee files, showed they were hired on 10/24/2022 as a hospitality assistant. Documentation in the employee file showed Staff Q had completed their competency course for the NAC class on 03/01/2023 and began working in the facility as a NAR. Staff P did not complete the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) for 4 of 5 residents (Residents 22, 35, 24, and 188) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. The facility failed to monitor targeted behaviors and adverse side effects (unwanted, uncomfortable or dangerous effects from medications), ensured there were valid indications/conditions diagnosed for resident psychotropic medication use, document rationale for the continuous use of as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication, consistently attempt non-pharmacological interventions (alternative treatment of a resident's symptoms that do not involve medications and directed toward understanding, preventing and relieving a resident's distress or loss of abilities) prior to psychotropic medication use. These failures placed residents at an increased risk for falls, experiencing medication-related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident, Resident Representative (RR), or payee were notified when their personal funds account reached a balance that was below $200 of the Social Security Income (SSI, a monthly Social Security benefit for people with low incomes, limited resources and who are blind, disabled or 65 or older) resource limit of $2000, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 24) reviewed for personal funds. This failed practice placed the resident at risk of losing their Medicaid (a federal system of health insurance for those requiring financial assistance) or SSI eligibility. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated policy, titled Resident Personal Funds showed, residents who received Medicaid benefits would be notified when their personal funds account reached less than $200 of the resource limit for one person. The policy further showed if the account reached the resource limit for one person, the resident could lose eligibility for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a process to assist residents and/or their representatives in the development and periodic review of Advanced Directives (AD) for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 60 and 19) reviewed for AD. This deficient practice denied the residents and/or their representatives the opportunity to make their choices known, regarding end-of-life care. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Resident's Rights Regarding Treatment and Advanced Directives, showed that: On admission, the facility will determine if the resident has executed an advance directive, and if not, determine whether the resident would like to formulate one. The facility will provide the resident or resident representative information, in a manner that is easy to understand, about the right to refuse medical or surgical treatment and formulate an advanced directive. Any decision making regarding the resident's choices will be documented in the resident's medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a required liability notice for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 77) reviewed for liability notices, who was discharged from the facility and had skilled benefit days remaining. This failure placed the resident at risk for not fully understanding their Medicare benefits. Findings included . Review of the form titled Form instructions for the Notice of Medicare Non-coverage, dated 12/31/2011 showed that the Medicare provider or health plan must give an advanced, completed copy of the Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNOC) to beneficiaries/enrollees receiving skilled nursing, home health, comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facility, and hospice services not later than two days (48 hours) before the termination of services. <Resident 77> Review of the comprehensive assessment, dated 10/03/2023, showed Resident 77 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include fracture of spine, muscle weakness and chronic pain. The comprehensive assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a system for notifying residents of the grievance process or how to report a grievance (verbally, in writing or anonymously) for 16 of 16 residents (Residents 5, 243, 15, 18, 19, 37, 38, 45, 47, 60, 65, 66, 81, 82, 239 and 241) reviewed during resident council. Additionally, the facility failed to consistently follow up on missing items and concerns voiced during resident council meetings. This failure placed residents at an increased risk for unresolved concerns, their right to express their concerns and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the undated facility policy titled, Resident and Family Grievance, showed grievances may be expressed, anonymously, verbally or in writing to facility staff, the grievance official, during resident or family council meetings, and through the customer service line. The policy showed that a grievance form would be filled out, by facility staff, with detailed specifics of the concerns. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to comprehensively assess and monitor the need for a physical restraint (any physical, mechanical device or equipment that limits a resident's freedom of movement) when applying foam wedges under the resident's bed linen which prevented the resident from getting out of bed, for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 42) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed the resident at risk for the inhibition of free movement and/or activity and unmet care needs. Findings included . <Resident 42> Review of Resident 42's medical record showed they were admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's (an impairment of brain function, which causes memory loss, forgetfulness and thinking abilities) and a history of falls. Review of the most recent comprehensive assessment, dated 10/13/2023, showed Resident 42's cognition was severely impaired and was dependent on facility staff for eating, oral hygiene, bathing, dressing, personal hygiene, rolling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of potential abuse and/or neglect to the state agency for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 55) reviewed for abuse/neglect. This failure placed the residents at risk for unidentified abuse/neglect, and the potential for ongoing abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . Review of facility's undated policy titled, Abuse, neglect and exploitation, showed, .reporting of all alleged violations to the Administrator, state agency .and to all other required agencies within specified timeframes .Immediately, but no later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury .not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in bodily injury. <Resident 55> Review of Resident 55's medical record showed the resident re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] after a two day stay in the hospital for assessment and evaluation for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough or complete investigation following allegations of rape and/or abuse for 1 of 6 residents (Residents 55) reviewed for abuse. This failure placed the resident at risk for unidentified abuse, unmet care needs, and the potential continued exposure to abuse. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, showed, when abuse, neglect, or exploitation was suspected, or reported, an immediate investigation would be started. The policy further showed the facility would ensure residents were protected from physical and psychosocial harm or further abuse during and after the investigation. <Resident 55> Review of Resident 55's medical record showed the resident readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after a two day stay at the hospital related to a fall. Resident 55 admitted with diagnoses to include depression and dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan (CP) to address anticoagulant (a high-risk, blood thinning medication) use for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 26) reviewed for activities of daily living. This failure placed the resident at risk for unrecognized adverse side effects (ASE) and unmet care needs. Findings included . <Resident 26> Review of Resident 26's medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include a blood clotting disorder in the lungs and a left arm fracture. Review of the comprehensive assessment, dated 10/04/2023 showed the resident was cognitively intact, had weakness to their left arm that remained after recovery from the fracture, and required staff assistance with sitting to standing, showering, and walking. The assessment further showed the resident received an anticoagulant on 7 days during the lookback period. During a concurrent observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 2 residents (Resident 27 and 55) reviewed for constipation were assessed daily for frequency of bowel movements, and signs and symptoms of impaction or obstruction, in accordance with professional standards of practice. Additionally, the facility failed to develop an integrated comprehensive care plan for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 246) reviewed for Hospice. These failures placed residents at risk for medical complications and unmet care needs. Finding included . <Bowels> <Resident 27> Review of Resident 27's medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include respiratory failure and heart failure. Review of the significant change assessment, dated 11/06/2023, showed the resident's cognition was intact and required staff assistance for their bed mobility, transfers, toileting, and personal hygiene. During a concurrent observation and interview on 11/08/2023 at 12:08 PM, showed Resident 27 lying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who had an indwelling urinary catheter (IUC, a tube placed in the bladder which drains urine out into a collection bag) received care and services to prevent urinary tract infections (a condition were bacteria enter through the urinary meatus [a passage or opening leading to the interior of the body] and infect the kidneys or bladder) for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 54), reviewed for urinary catheter care. This placed the resident at risk of developing medical complications, secondary to an infection in the bladder. Findings included . Review of Lippincott Nursing Procedures 8th edition, dated 2019, showed when performing IUC care (cleaning of the IUC tubing and urinary meatus), .to avoid contaminating the urinary tract, always clean by wiping away from, never towards, the urinary meatus .keep the drainage bag below the level of the patient's bladder to prevent backflow of urine into the bladder, which increases the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were adequately monitored and/or administered within the physician ordered parameters (instructions to ensure medications are properly given and may prevent unwanted effects) for 2 of 7 residents (Residents 22 and 29) reviewed for unnecessary medications. These failures placed residents at an increased risk for adverse side effects, unintended medical complications, and unmet care needs. Findings included . <Resident 22> Review of the resident's medical record showed they were admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including heart failure, long-term kidney disease and orthostatic hypotension (a form of low blood pressure that happens when you stand up from sitting or lying down). Review of Resident 22's comprehensive assessment, dated 10/05/2023, showed they were cognitively intact and able to make their needs known. Review of Resident 22's physician orders, dated 10/04/2023, showed Midodrine (a medication used for treatment of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were labeled, dated, or discarded in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for 1 of 1 medication room and 2 of 4 medication carts (West and East carts). This deficient practice placed residents at risk of receiving compromised or inaccurate medications and had the potential for misappropriation of residents' property. Findings included . Review of the undated facility policy titled Medication Storage showed medication rooms were routinely inspected by the consultant pharmacist for discontinued, outdated, defective, or deteriorated medications with worn, illegible, or missing labels. These medications were to be destroyed in accordance with the Destruction of Unused Drugs policy. Review of the undated facility policy titled Destruction of Unused Drugs showed all unused, unwanted, and non-returnable medications should be removed from the storage area and destroyed and disposed of in compliance with all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices for 4 of 4 residents (Resident 246, 189, 190 and 54 ) were implemented related to hand hygiene and glove changes between dirty and clean tasks (after touching the resident and/or the resident's environment and during wound care dressing changes). These failures placed the residents at an increased risk for exposure to cross-contamination (harmful spread of diseases) and transmission of infectious diseases. Findings included . Review of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, Core Infection Prevention and Control Practices for Safe Healthcare Delivery in All Settings, dated 11/29/2022, showed; Healthcare personnel should use an alcohol-based hand rub or wash with soap and water after they touched a resident or their environment; After contact with contaminated surfaces; Immediately after glove removal; Wash hands for at least 15 seconds; Do not use the same pair of gloves for care of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-01-13 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff posting was posted daily and/or reflected the actual nursing staff hours worked during 4 of 5 days of the survey period. This failed practice prevented residents, family members and visitors from knowing the facility's actual number of available nursing staff. Findings included . Observation on 01/06/2025 at 9:40 AM, showed the nursing staff posting across from the nurses' station was dated 01/03/2025 (three day's prior) and did not show actual nursing staff hours posted for the current day. Observations on 01/07/2025 at 10:09 AM, 01/08/2025 at 8:59 AM, and 01/09/2025 at 8:29 AM showed the nursing staff posting across from the nurses' station was dated 01/03/2025 and did not show any adjustments to nursing staff hours posted for the past four days. Observation on 01/10/2025 at 9:04 AM, and at 3:05 PM, sowed the nursing staff posting across from the nurses' station was dated 01/09/2025 (prior day's date) and did not show actual nursing staff hours posted for the current day. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,340 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,340 — penalty dated 2023-11-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ANDERSON, BRANDTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2022
FROST, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2019
LINDAHL, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2019
LINDAHL, KIRKMANIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2019
LINDAHL, SCOTTIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/01/2019
ZWAHLEN, JAYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
CONSOLIDATED BILLING SERVICES INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2019
FOUNDATION RESOURCE CENTER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2019
PACIFIC MEDICAL SPECIALTY GROUPOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/10/2025
POWERBACK REHABILITATION LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2019
DE ORO, BRIANNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/24/2025
ELLINGTON, BRIANNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2024
FLEMMING, STANLEYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
GINN, BRENDENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2023
MARTINSON, WENDYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/16/2019
RICKETTS, ALEXANDRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/16/2019
817 PIONEER AVE, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2019
LINDAHL, DAVIDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2019

CMS files one row per role, so the 38 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+9.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$631K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 76%Medicare 8%Other / private 15%

About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $631K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$349per resident / day
operating cost
$10,596per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$386per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505151. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next