No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Cheney Care Center

2219 North 6th Street, Cheney, WA 99004 · Non profit - Other · 54 certified beds · (509) 235-6196 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (509) 235-6196 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0610) — most recent Nov 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)1 actual-harm citation
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (50) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
19 N 7th St · (509) 235-6151 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
1720 2nd St · (509) 462-6569 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Safeway0.7 mi
2710 1st St · (509) 235-6400 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(509) 498-9250 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased22.9%14.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.6%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.5%1.0%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.8%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms75.9%17.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury7.4%2.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.5%17.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.5%12.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.4%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.4%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.8%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.1%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit18.1%13.4%12.0%worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 89 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

52.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
40.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.39U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 40.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 50 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 67% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF52.6%CMS range 45.0–62.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.6%CMS range 5.7–13.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge40.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge44.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge36.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.9%CMS range 2.9–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.881.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
1.05
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.24
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.93
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.37
RN hoursweekends
38.8%
Total nursing turnover
42.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 54 beds and averages 34.7 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.93 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.24 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.43 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.13 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 39% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-20)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-06-05)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

50 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 39 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were identified as being high risk for falls were provided adequate supervision and care plan interventions were developed/implemented and revised timely for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for falls. Resident 1, who had seven documented in-facility falls between 04/17/2026 and 05/17/2026, experienced harm when they fell, had severe pain to their left side of their head, and required emergency transfer to the hospital where they were diagnosed with a subdural hematoma (bleeding on the surface of the brain caused by a head injury). Findings included.The facility's Fall Prevention Program policy, last reviewed 05/04/2026, documented upon admission, a fall risk assessment was completed to determine a resident's level of fall risk. Based upon the level of fall risk identified, interventions were to be initiated in the baseline care plan, an initial care plan developed within 48 hours of admission that instructed staff on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, use of personal protective equipment such as disposable gowns and gloves to prevent the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria or other infectious organisms) was implemented when indicated for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 19, 31, and 48) reviewed. Additionally, Infection Prevention policies were not reviewed annually as required. These findings placed residents and staff at risk of spreading or acquiring infectious bacteria, and at risk of continued use of outdated policies and procedures.Findings included . The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) April 2024 Implementation of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Use in Nursing Homes to Prevent Spread of Multidrug-resistant Organisms (MDROs) documented MDROs may be indirectly transferred from resident to resident during high-contact care activities that included dressing, bathing/showering, transferring, providing hygiene,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-08-20 · tag F0887 — widespread
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop procedures that ensured staff were educated on the risks, benefits and potential side effects of the COVID-19 (a virus that caused serious illness or even death) vaccine, that staff were offered information on obtaining the vaccine, and that the COVID-19 vaccination status of staff was maintained for 1 of 1 sampled staff (Staff H) reviewed. This failure placed staff and residents at risk of being uninformed of their vaccination choices, and at risk of becoming ill with COVID-19.Findings included.The 01/20/2024 facility COVID-19 Vaccination policy documented it was the policy of the facility to offer their residents and staff the COVID-19 vaccine to minimize the risk of acquiring, transmitting or experiencing complications from the COVID-19 virus. Staff documentation related to the COVID-19 vaccination was to include at a minimum:-education regarding the risks, benefits and side effects of the vaccine-the offering of the vaccine or information on obtaining the vaccine-documentation of any religious or medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 34 and 29), reviewed for unnecessary medications, were informed of the potential risks associated with the use of psychotropic medications (medications that can affect the mind, emotions, and behaviors) and that their consent was obtained prior to administering psychotropic medications. This failure placed the residents at risk of not being fully informed of the potential risks and benefits of taking the medications.Findings included <Resident 29> The 06/28/2025 quarterly assessment documented Resident 29 had diagnoses that included Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the nervous system that affected movement), malnutrition, and anxiety. Resident 29 was severely cognitively impaired and took medications for depression and anxiety (psychotropic medications) daily. A family member had been designated to make decisions for the resident. A review of provider orders documented on 06/30/2025, an order was given to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman received written notification of a hospital transfer and/or discharge, for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 50, 7, and 2), reviewed for hospitalization/discharge. This failure placed the residents at risk of not having access to additional advocacy services from the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Findings included. <Resident 50> The 07/07/2025 entry assessment documented Resident 50 admitted to the facility from the hospital. Review of nursing progress notes documented on 07/10/2025, Resident 50 was sent to the hospital to be evaluated after experiencing difficulty breathing despite using supplemental oxygen. Additional record review found no documentation that showed the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman had been notified of the resident's transfer to the hospital, as required. <Resident 2> Review of the record documented Resident 2 was initially admitted on [DATE]. The 05/24/2025 admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 34, 4, and 2), reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, an assessment completed prior to admission into a skilled nursing facility to determine whether a resident with a diagnosis of a serious mental illness needed specialized mental health services) was completed prior to admission, accurately, and if indicated, a referral for a PASRR Level II (a more in-depth screening assessment) had been made. Failure to ensure PASRR was completed accurately for Residents 34 and 4, and failure to ensure a PASRR was completed for Resident 2 after their decision to reside at the facility following an exempted hospital stay (being admitted to the facility directly from the hospital after receiving acute inpatient care, and an expected length of stay at the nursing facility of 30 days or less), placed the residents at risk for a diminished quality of life and unidentified care needs related to their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication was administered per professional standards of practice for 1 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 31) reviewed during one medication administration observed. Specifically, a licensed nurse left medications at the resident's bedside without observing the medications being taken. This failure placed the residents at risk of not receiving the ordered medication and placed all residents at potential risk of medication errors.Findings included .The 01/20/2024 facility Medication Administration policy documented medications were to be administered by licensed nurses as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice. The policy documented the nurse was to observe the resident take the medications.During an observation on 08/18/2025 at 10:22 AM, Staff G, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), prepared the medication Fosfomycin Tromethamine (an antibiotic) by mixing it with water for Resident 31. After giving Resident 31 other medications and watching them swallow them, Staff G handed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide bathing and personal hygiene/grooming for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 41) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLS). Failure to provide bathing, shaving and nail care placed Resident 41 at risk for poor personal hygiene, diminished quality of life and unmet care needs. Findings included . The 07/11/2025 quarterly assessment documented Resident 41 had diagnoses which included stroke and diabetes. Resident 41 needed assistance from nursing staff to complete ADLs for bathing and personal hygiene/grooming tasks such as nail care and shaving. On 08/11/2025 at 11:45 AM, Resident 41 was observed lying in bed watching television. Resident 41's hair appeared greasy, facial stubble covered their cheeks, chin and upper lip, and the fingernails of both hands were long with black debris underneath them. When asked if they had any concerns about their care, Resident 41 stated it had been a week since they were last bathed. Staff would inform Resident 41 that they were on the bath schedule…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently follow care planned supervision interventions and fully evaluate the effectiveness of the fall prevention interventions in place for 1 of 3 sample residents (Resident 2) reviewed for accidents/hazards. This failure placed residents at risk for accidents and diminished quality of life.Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, dated 01/20/2024, Fall Prevention Program policy documented each resident will be assessed for fall risk and will receive care and services in accordance with their individualized level of risk to minimize the likelihood of falls. Upon admission, the nurse will complete a fall risk assessment along with the admission assessment to determine the resident's level of fall risk. The nurse will indicate in the electronic medical record the resident's fall risk and initiate interventions on the resident's baseline care plan. Residents assigned low/moderate risk will have universal interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure consistent communication with the dialysis center regarding fluid restrictions occurred for 1 of 1 sample residents (Resident 19) reviewed. This failure placed the resident at risk of fluid weight gain, fluid overload and unintended health consequences.Findings included .The 07/08/2025 facility Hemodialysis policy documented the facility provided necessary care and treatment consistent with professional standards and the resident's person-centered care plan to meet the special medical, nursing and psychosocial needs of residents receiving dialysis. The facility was to coordinate and collaborate with the dialysis facility to ensure there was ongoing communication and collaboration for the implementation of the dialysis care plan by nursing home and dialysis staff. The 06/25/2025 annual comprehensive assessment documented Resident 19 had diagnoses that included end-stage renal disease (ESRD, kidney failure) and was dependent on dialysis (a mechanical way of removing waste from the body when the kidneys no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered as ordered for 1 of 1 sample residents (Resident 19) reviewed for dialysis care. Specifically, alternative arrangements were not made with the provider causing Resident 19 to have doses of their medications omitted on the mornings of their dialysis sessions. This failure placed the resident at risk for unintended health consequences and decreased quality of life.Findings included .The 06/25/2025 annual comprehensive assessment documented Resident 19 had diagnoses that included end-stage kidney disease dependent on dialysis (a mechanical way of removing waste from the body when the kidneys no longer functioned), diabetes and high blood pressure. Resident 19 was independent for most activities of daily living, was cognitively intact and had dialysis treatments every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday.Resident 19 had the following medication orders:-hydralazine 10 milligrams (mg) three times daily for high blood pressure-Calcium acetate 667 mg, two capsules three times daily with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 39 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently monitor the medication refrigerator temperatures for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms to ensure they were at safe storage levels. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medication. Findings included.The 01/20/2023 article titled Storage and Handling of Immunobiologics published by the Center for Disease Control, documented failure to follow recommended storage and refrigerator temperatures for immunobiologics (a medicinal preparation made from living organisms and their products, such as a serum or vaccine) reduced or destroyed their potency which resulted in inadequate or no immune response in the recipient. Refrigerator storage temperatures needed to be kept between 36 through 46 degrees Fahrenheit and prompt immediate action needed to occur when the temperature was out of range. During the review of the medication storage room with Staff E, Infection Preventionist, on 08/20/2025 at 9:06 AM, the medication refrigerator temperature log form was observed to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve food that was palatable and had an appetizing appearance, and temperature for 2 of 2 meals observed and 1 of 1 test tray sampled. This failure resulted in the potential for all residents to have decreased appetite and decreased quality of life.Findings included .In an interview on 08/11/2025 at 11:33 AM, Resident 34 stated the food was bad and did not look good.In an interview on 08/11/2025 at 11:55 AM, Resident 48 stated that the food was terrible. They said it had no seasoning, everything was bland, and the appearance was unappetizing.During an observation on 08/11/2025 at 12:00 PM, a lunch tray was delivered to Resident 16. After seeing the food, Resident 16 stated it did not look very appetizing, took a bite then requested a cheeseburger.During an observation of the lunch meal on 08/11/2025 at 12:14 PM, in the main dining room, the food served was light brown pasta and light brown meat in a light brown gravy, dull green peas or green beans, and brown apple juice. The food lacked bright and varied colors.The lunch…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to label and date food products in 2 of 2 resident snack refrigerators. This failure placed the residents at risk for food borne illness and decreased quality of life. Findings included .During an observation on 08/15/2025 at 3:04 PM, the resident snack refrigerator in the nurses' main charting room, contained six hard-boiled eggs in a plastic bag which was not labeled with a name or date. During an observation on 08/15/2025 at 3:08 PM the resident snack refrigerator on the transitional care unit contained six hard-boiled eggs in a plastic bag, and a bottle of honey mustard dressing, which were not labeled with a name or date.In an interview on 08/20/2025 at 9:18 AM, Staff M, Dietary Manager, stated the resident snack refrigerators were checked daily by the prep cook for proper labeling of food items and expiration dates. Staff M stated it was important for food items to be labeled and dated so the staff knew how long the item had been in the refrigerator and to whom it belonged. They stated unlabeled/undated food items would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and notify the physician of a non-pressure related skin condition for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for skin integrity. This failure placed the residents at risk for potential worsening skin conditions and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Wound and Skin, dated 07/23/2013, showed the facility policy was to identify all wound and skin issues upon admission, on an ongoing basis, and on the routine weekly skin check day using the skin assessment tool. Once a wound or skin issue was identified, the Licensed Nurse (LN) was to document the characteristics of the issue i.e. size, depth, color, drainage, and location in the chart and on an incident report. This information must be documented in the skin assessment on a weekly basis. The findings were to be reported to the MD and fax MD with plan for treatment. Staff were to record this on the electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) under treatments and was to be followed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed Contact Precautions, when indicated, for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 1), during wound care. This failure placed the residents at risk for spread of infection, illnesses, and unintended health consequences. Findings included . Per the Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines, staff should wear a gown and gloves for residents on Contact Precautions. Additionally, if there is a chance for splashes or sprays of body fluid eye precaution and mask may be needed. According to a facility assessment, dated 03/02/2025, Resident 1 had a history of a stroke, anxiety and depression. The resident had some difficulty making their needs known. Review of a hospital discharge orders, dated 05/12/2025, showed the resident had abscesses that had been drained and tested positive for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA, a bacteria that is resistant to many antibiotics and highly contagious by skin to skin contact or contact with contaminated surfaces). Dressing changes were to be daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-13 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed-hold notice (a notice to inform residents of their right to pay the facility to hold their room/bed while they were hospitalized ), to the resident and/or their representative at the time of discharge, or within 24 hours of transfer to the hospital, for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1, 3, 6, and 7), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed residents at risk for a lack of knowledge regarding the right to a bed-hold while they were hospitalized . Findings included . <Resident 1> The 11/20/2024 quarterly assessment documented Resident 1 was admitted with a history of a stroke, anxiety and depression. The resident was able to make needs known. Review of nursing progress notes, dated 09/16/2024, showed Resident 1 was transferred to the hospital due to complaints of increased numbness to their lower legs and pain in their hand. Additional record review showed no documentation the resident had been provided a bed-hold notice. <Resident 3> The 12/20/2024 admission assessment documented Resident 3 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-13 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, a screening required to be completed prior to admission to a nursing home that looked for indicators that one may have a serious mental illness) were completed for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1, 3, and 7), reviewed for PASARR's. Resident 1 and 3 were not referred for a Level II evaluation (an assessment that made recommendations about specialized services needed to determine the best setting to meet a person's behavioral health needs) and Resident 7 did not have a PASARR completed prior to admission to the facility, as required. This failure placed the residents at risk for a decline in their mental health and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the quarterly assessment, dated 11/20/2024, showed Resident 1 was admitted with a history of a stroke, anxiety and depression. The resident was able to make their needs known. Resident 1's mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consider re-admission for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 3), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the resident at risk for increased anxiety related to being placed in an unfamiliar environment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of a facility form titled Transfer and Discharge ., revised on 12/24 documented emergency transfers/discharges were initiated by the facility for medical reasons to an acute care setting such as a hospital, for the immediate safety and welfare of a resident. The resident will be permitted to return to the facility upon discharge from the acute care setting. In a situation where the facility initiates discharge while the resident is in the hospital following emergency transfer, the facility will have evidence that the resident's status at the time the resident seeks to return to the facility . Review of the admission assessment, dated 12/20/2024, showed Resident 3 was admitted with diagnoses which included a stroke, Parkinson's Disease (a progressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure behavioral health needs were identified and met for 2 of 4 sample residents (Resident 1 and 3), reviewed for behavioral-emotional health. Failure to assess residents behavioral needs, identify individual resident responses to stressors and develop person-centered interventions placed residents at risk for unidentified behavior triggers, unmet behavioral needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 1> According to the admission assessment, dated 08/23/2024, Resident 1 had diagnoses to include a stroke with left sided weakness, anxiety and depression. Resident 1 had difficulty making their needs known. The resident had hallucinations (where you hear, see, smell, taste or feel things that appear to be real but only exist in your mind). The resident's mood assessment showed they felt bad about themselves, felt down, depressed, or hopeless, and had little interest in doing things. The resident took antidepressant and antianxiety medication. Review of the Pre-admission Screening and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-22 · tag F0557 — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based upon observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate disposition of personal belongings upon admission, throughout their stay at the facility, and at the time of discharge, for 6 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6) reviewed for missing items. This failure placed the residents at risk for loss of personal belongings and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of a 06/2024 facility policy titled Resident Personal Belongings showed, the facility assured the resident's belongings were rightfully returned to the resident or their representative in the event of a death or discharge from the facility. This policy instructed the staff to inventory all personal belongings at the time of admission and retain documentation in the medical record. Staff would add additional possessions brought in during the duration of the resident's stay to the existing Personal Belongings Inventory List. Following the discharge or death of a resident, all personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their Abuse and Neglect Prohibition Policies and Procedures to include, not reporting or investigating an elopement and resident-to-resident altercation for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed the resident and other residents at risk for repeated abuse and elopement and precluded the state agency (SA) from being aware of and investigating the circumstances surrounding the resident's elopement and resident-to-resident altercation. Findings included . Review of an undated facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation showed, the facility would immediately investigate when suspicion or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occurred. The policy directed the facility to identify and interview all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegations. The policy instructed the facility to report all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation or orientation for a safe discharge for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for discharge planning. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of a 01/2024 facility policy titled Transfer and Discharge showed, the nurse who cared for the resident would ensure a Discharge Summary was completed for anticipated or resident-initiated discharges. The summary would show a description of the resident's stay that included their diagnoses, the course of illness/treatment or therapy, any pertinent labs, radiology and consultation reports, and a final summary of the resident's status. In an interview of 11/15/2024 at 11:37 AM, Resident 1's Representative stated that when the resident was discharged to a community provider, the facility did not send with the resident their medical file and that the receiving provider had zero idea what was going on with [Resident 1]. Review of progress notes showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff implemented recommendations to help prevent kidney stones for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for urinary tract infections (UTI). This failure placed the resident at risk for repeated kidney stone development and associated discomfort. Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the diagnoses list showed but was not limited to, dementia, a history of UTI, kidney stones, and chronic kidney disease. Review of a 04/10/2024 Urology (branch of medicine that focuses on surgical and medical diseases of the urinary system and the reproductive organs) Visit Summary showed Resident 1 was seen for kidney stones. In this visit, the provider removed a stent (tube that allows urine to flow from the kidneys into the bladder) and gave the following recommendations to help prevent kidney stones, Drink 8 - 10 cups (64 - 80 ounces) of water daily to maintain proper hydration, which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff provided and monitored the required amount of fluids to ensure adequate hydration for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for hydration. This failure placed the resident at risk for outcomes associated with insufficient fluid intake, like dehydration and urinary tract infections (UTI). Findings included . Review of a 09/18/2024 annual comprehensive assessment showed Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medically complex conditions. The assessment showed the staff assessed Resident 1 to have severe cognitive impairment and was independent with eating. In an interview on 11/14/2024 at 3:45 PM, a Collateral Contact stated that the staff, didn't hydrate [Resident 1] enough and that's why [the resident] ended up in the hospital with a urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of a 01/2024 facility Hydration policy showed, sufficient fluid was the amount needed to prevent dehydration and maintain health. The amount of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-05 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 2 residents (3, 11) had current and complete oxygen orders and failed to ensure that oxygen equipment was maintained in a clean manner for 5 of 5 residents (3, 11, 14, 17, 28) reviewed for respiratory care. These failures placed the residents at risk for respiratory complications and infection. Findings included . A facility policy, reviewed on 01/20/2024, titled Oxygen Administration documented that orders for oxygen should include the flow rate (level of oxygen, usually measured in liters/minute.) In addition, the policy documented to change the oxygen tubing and mask weekly and as needed, and to follow the manufacturer recommendation for cleaning the filters. <Resident 3> According to an annual assessment dated [DATE], Resident 3 made their needs known and had diagnoses that included dementia and chronic respiratory failure. A review of Resident 3's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) showed an order dated 07/28/2022, that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure meals were served to residents at an appropriate and appetizing temperature. This failed practice resulted in the potential risk for decreased quality of life for all residents. Findings inculded . According to the Washington State Food Handlers Guide Website, The Washington State Department of Health, Safety and Licensing Division recommends that all potentially hazardous foods be held at a temperature of 41°F or below in commercial refrigerators and freezers. This includes meats, fish, poultry, eggs, dairy products, cooked vegetables, cooked rice and pasta, cut melons, and other perishable items. All frozen foods should be stored at 0°F or below. Hot food items should be held at a temperature of 140°F or above. On 06/04/2024 while the lunch meal was being served, it was observed that periodic checks of the temperature of the foods being held on the steam table was not completed. During an observation on 06/04/2024 at 12:10 PM, Staff CC, Cook, was heating up soup in the microwave oven, and when they removed the soup…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 sampled residents (25), reviewed for unnecessary medications, were informed of the potential risks and benefits associated with the use of psychotropic medications (medications that can affect the mind, emotions, and behaviors). Failure to obtain the informed consents resulted in the resident and/or representative not being informed. Findings included . <Resident 25> Per the 02/29/2024 quarterly assessment, Resident 25 had diagnoses which included hallucinations and received psychotropic medications daily. A review of the Order Summary Report documented on 11/24/2023, Resident 25 was prescribed psychotropic medication (Trazodone) to treat depression, and Seroquel to treat the hallucinations. Review of the November 2023 Medication Administration Record documented Resident 18 received the first doses of Trazodone on 11/24/2023 and Seroquel on 11/25/2023. Review of the Psychoactive Medication Informed Consent, a form used to provide education related to the potential risks and benefits of psychotropic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for 1 of 2 sampled resident (25), reviewed for environment. This failure placed Resident 25 at risk for possible illness from unclean equipment, a lack of dignity, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 25 had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). A 02/29/2024 quarterly assessment documented Resident 25 was moderately cognitively impaired, required partial to maximum assistance for activities of daily living and used a wheelchair for mobility. On 05/28/2024 at 11:13 AM, Resident 25 was observed in the dining room sitting in the wheelchair. The wheelchair was unclean with food smeared on the sides of the chair. On 05/30/2024 at 9:48 AM, Resident 25 was observed in bed asleep. The wheelchair was unclean with food smeared on the sides and foot pedals of the wheelchair. Additional observations of the wheelchair being unclean were made on 05/30/2024 at 9:48…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary, including a recapitulation of the resident's stay as required, for 1 of 1 sampled residents (40), reviewed for discharge. This failure placed the resident at risk for having an incomplete medical record. Findings included . The 12/30/2023 admission assessment documented Resident 40 was cognitively intact to make decisions regarding care, needed moderate to maximum assistance from staff to complete activities of daily living, and had received physical therapy for four days during the assessment period. A discharge assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had discharged and was expected to return to the facility. A progress note dated 03/16/2024 at 6:45 PM documented Resident 40 had informed a nursing assistant that they were looking for plastic bags so they could suffocate themselves. The resident was assessed for depression and safety interventions were implemented to include increased supervision. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement bowel management protocol when indicated for 3 of 7 sampled residents (2,18,193), reviewed for constipation. These failures placed residents at risk for complications, worsening conditions, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Bowel Protocol, dated 05/10/2023, instructed nursing staff to implement the bowel program if a resident did not have a bowel movement (BM) for two days. The policy documented nursing staff was to administer Milk of Magnesia (MOM) on day two of no BM, Miralax on day three, Senna on day four, a suppository on day five, and if no BM on day six, the provider was to be notified. <Resident 2> According to the 04/18/2024 quarterly assessment, Resident 2 required maximal to total assistance for most activities of daily living including dressing, transfers, and toileting. Resident 2 was incontinent of bowel. The assessment further documented Resident 2 had severe cognitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to document a detailed nutritional assessment at time of admission, for a resident identified as being at risk for compromised nutritional status. This failure resulted in potential impaired nutrition, and an increased risk of: mortality, impairment of anticipated wound healing, decline in function, fluid and electrolyte imbalance/dehydration, and unplanned weight change. Findings included . Review of undated nutritional management policy, a comprehensive nutritional assessment would be completed upon admission, and the dietitian would use data gathered from the nutritional assessment to estimate the resident's calorie, nutrient, and fluid needs and whether intake was adequate to meet those needs. According to the 04/11/2024 assessment Resident 10 had cognitive impairment and was unable to direct their care. They required assistance for most activities of daily living (ADL's) including transfers, toileting, and mobility. Resident 10 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately reconcile all controlled medications in 1 of 2 medication carts (Cart 1), reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed residents at risk for misappropriation of their controlled medications and placed the facility at increased risk for controlled substance drug diversion. Findings included . During an inspection of the narcotic drawer on Cart One on 06/05/2024 at 10:49 AM with Staff D, Registered Nurse (RN), a bottle of narcotic pain pills labeled for a current facility resident, was observed. The cap of this bottle was wrapped in clear plastic tape, with the number 56 in black marker, half on the tape and half on the side of the bottle. Staff D stated that the medication was from the resident's home supply. Staff D further stated that the 56 was placed that way, so it would be noticeable if anyone removed the tape to access the medication. In addition, Staff D stated they had been going by the pill quantity written on the tape, rather than counting the actual pills, during the narcotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure recommendations from the pharmacist were addressed, for 1 of 5 sample residents (25), reviewed for unnecessary medications. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving medications at inappropriate times and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The Consultant Pharmacy Report, dated 04/2024, documented Resident 25 received Melatonin (a medication to assist with sleep) and it was recommended the time the medication was administered be changed to be given 60 to 90 minutes before the resident's bedtime. Review of the April and May 2024 medication administration records documented the medication was to be given at bedtime. Resident 25 received the Melatonin from 7:00 PM to 10:53 PM A review of Resident 25's record documented no response from the provider or nursing regarding the recommendation. During an interview on 06/04/2024 at 3:50 PM, Staff G, Nursing Assistant, stated Resident 25 went to bed after dinner, between six to seven o'clock. During an interview on 06/04/2024 at 3:29 PM, Staff B,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-05 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff had the required qualifications (current Food Worker Cards) for 2 dietary staff (W, X). This failed practice had the potential risk for unsafe food handling practices and placed all residents at risk for developing foodborne illness. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure there were enough staff in the dining room during meals to assist residents timely. This failure had the potential risk for residents being served food at unappetizing temperatures, decreased appetite and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Dietary Staff> A review of the dietary cards on 06/04/2024 at 09:28am showed Staff W, dietary aide (hire date 01/30/2024) had a Washington State Food Workers card with an effective date of 06/04/2024 and Staff X, Prep [NAME] (hire date 05/01/2024) did not have a current Washington State Food Workers card. Observations were made of both Staff W and Staff X preparing and/or serving food on 05/29/2024 at 09:28AM and 06/04/2024 at 11:05AM. During an interview on 06/04/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure food in the snack/nourishment refrigerators was labelled and dated, expired foods were removed, and the snack/nourishment refrigerators were monitored routinely for proper temperature. This failure resulted in a potential risk of food borne illness for all residents. Findings included . During an observation on 06/04/2024 at 09:37 AM of the Snack/Nourishment refrigerator on the Transitional Care Unit (TCU), there was an open apple and open grape juice container with no opened date, a foil covered container labelled with a name and room number but not dated, an open half full gallon jug of Kikkoman soy sauce with date of 9/2 but no year, and sugar free coffee creamer with an expiration date of 05/22/2024. There was a temperature log for March, April and May 2024 taped to the front of the refrigerator with only 5 temperature readings recorded in March, no April temperature readings recorded, and only 1 temperature reading recorded in May. No temperature log was present for June 2024. Staff O, Nursing Assistant (NA) was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff performed hand hygiene and wore gloves during the meal service when indicated, maintained a resident's nails in a sanitary manner prior to and after meals, and not cleansing a resident's skin prior to an injection. These failures placed the residents at risk for infection, transmission of communicable diseases and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene revised 01/20/2024, documented hand hygiene was the means to prevent the spread of infections. The policy instructed staff to perform hand hygiene with alcohol-based hand rub or soap and water before and after direct contact with residents; before performing any non-surgical invasive procedure; before and after handling an invasive device; before handling clean or soiled dressings, before moving from a contaminated body site to a clean body site during resident care; after contact with object in the immediate vicinity of a resident; before and after handling food; before and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely evaluate and initiate treatment for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for accidents. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs related to transfers, increased pain, and worsening condition. Findings included . Review of the facility's 07/28/2023 incident investigation and nursing progress notes showed Resident 1 sustained a fall in their room on 07/28/2023 and complained of pain to their right hip. The physician was notified, and an x-ray was ordered, which showed no fracture (fx). According to a physician progress note dated 08/16/2023, Staff E, Physician, was notified by Resident 1 that they were still in pain from the fall, and it was quite bothersome to them. Staff E ordered a second x-ray that same day, which showed the resident sustained a right hip fx. Additional record review showed prior to injury, the resident required extensive assistance of 1-2 people for transfers. After the injury was identified on 07/28/2023, Resident 1 had Morphine ordered for increased pain. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-05-11 · tag F0949 — failed to train staff on dementia and abuse — widespread
    Provide behavior health training consistent with the requirements and as determined by a facility assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the failed to provide mandatory behavioral health training to 7 of 7 staff (Staff F, H, I, R, S, T and U), reviewed for staff training and competency. This deficient practice placed all residents with behavioral health diagnoses at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the State Operations Manual (SOM) Appendix PP, .behavioral health encompasses a resident's whole emotional and mental well-being, which includes, but is not limited to, the prevention and treatment of mental and substance use disorders . Review of the facility assessment dated [DATE] identified behavioral health care needs of the current residents included anxiety (feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness that may occur as a reaction to stress), depression (mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest), and schizophrenia (serious mental disorder in which people interpret reality abnormally). Review of all the training…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their bowel protocol timely and accurately for 7 of 23 sampled residents (Residents 32, 28, 25, 39, 2, 145, and 20), reviewed for bowel maintenance and quality of care. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk for complications related to unmanaged constipation such as discomfort, nausea, vomiting, bowel obstruction (blockage) and an overall diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the undated facility policy, Bowel Monitoring, showed the facility was .to monitor resident bowels daily . Further review showed the process included the night shift licensed nurse (LN) was to run a bowel report from the electronic health record, the day shift LN was to implement the interventions, and the evening shift LN was to assess and document the effectiveness of the interventions. Review of the document Bowel Regime, last revised in 2019, showed the following orders for bowel care: *no bowel movement (BM) in six shifts (two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices were maintained for hand hygiene during an observed medication pass and dining; failed to ensure sanitary handling of a lancet (a sharp-pointed two edged instrument used to prick the skin) to check a blood sugar; failed to maintain oxygen tubing in a sanitary manner; and failed to ensure a resident reviewed for use and care of a urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine), received appropriate care and services, to minimize the risk of associated urinary tract infections. These failures placed residents at risk of infection and illnesses. Findings included . <Medication Pass> In an observation on 05/04/2023 at 8:05 AM, Staff V, Medication Assistant Certified, applied a pair of gloves and cleansed a resident's eyes with a Systane wipe (a premoistened wipe to remove oily residue and debris). Staff C, with the same pair of gloves, administered the resident's eye…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of five sampled residents (Resident 2), reviewed for medication management, was fully informed of the potential risks associated with use of psychotropic medications (medications which alter thought processes). This failure placed the resident at risk to make decisions about medications while lacking relevant information, related to serious side effects. Findings included: According to the Nursing 2016 Drug Handbook (Wolters Kluwer, p. 40-41), antipsychotic medications (types of psychotropic medications intended to treat disorders which caused the individual to experience sensations, or hold beliefs, which were not consistent with reality) included a Black Box Warning: Elderly patients with dementia-related psychosis treated with antipsychotics are at increased risk for death. Serious adverse reactions to the medication included extrapyramidal symptoms (drug induced movement disorders, including tremors or involuntary movements). Additionally, the Drug Handbook (pg. 31-32) included a Black Box Warning for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide notification to the resident's representative of a change in condition for one of twenty sampled residents (Resident 24), reviewed for notification of change. This failure prevented the resident's representative from being informed of a skin condition, behaviors, refusal of medication, and participating in care decisions. Findings included . Resident 24 was admitted with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's disease (a progressive brain disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). According to the 02/28/2023 assessment, Resident 24 had memory impairments and required extensive assistance with activities of daily living. During an interview on 05/08/2023 at 2:54 PM, the resident's representative stated they were not notified of Resident 24's change in skin condition, behaviors, or refusal of medications. They additionally added that it was in the care plan to notify them of behaviors. Per record review, a progress note dated 12/11/2022 at 8:30 PM showed that during the evening medication pass,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely and thoroughly investigate 2 incidents involving 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 19), reviewed for abuse/neglect. This deficient practice disallowed an opportunity for an evaluation of facility practices, to determine if appropriate care and services were being provided, and placed residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing abuse/neglect. Findings included . Review of the medical record showed Resident 19 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of congestive heart failure (a chronic condition that occurs when the heart can't pump blood adequtely), pulmonary hypertension (a disease in which the blood pressure in the lungs is higher than normal), and a blood clot in the left leg. Review of the comprehensive assessment completed on 04/26/2023 showed the resident was cognitively intact and required the extensive assistance of one person for bathing, transfers, dressing, toileting, personal hygiene, and mobility. Additionally, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an updated Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for one of five sampled residents (Resident 28), reviewed for PASARR accuracy, who required a Level II evaluation due to a new mental health diagnoses. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk of not receiving specialized mental health services, unidentified needs, and a decrease in quality of life. Findings included . Review of the medical record showed Resident 28 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of stroke, high blood pressure, atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat), and anorexia (an abnormal loss of the appetite for food). Review of the comprehensive assessment completed on 02/12/2023 showed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of the undated and unsigned PASARR form for Resident 28 showed that a Level II evaluation was not indicated prior to admission to the facility. Review of the 06/25/2020 provider note showed new diagnoses of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) [an assessment used to identify people referred to nursing facilities with mental illness, intellectual disabilities, or related conditions], and a Level II assessment [a more in-depth screening, to identify whether nursing home services were needed and if specialized mental health services were required] was completed for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 2), reviewed for PASARR services. This failure placed the resident at risk for inappropriate placement, and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet mental health care needs. Findings included: Resident 2's Level I PASARR dated 10/20/2022, showed it was completed and signed by social services staff, sixteen days after the resident's admission to the facility. The PASARR stated that no level II was indicated. A level II PASSAR must be completed if the resident has an intellectual disability or a serious mental illness. The resident had a diagnosis of schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary, including a recapitulation of the resident's stay as required, for one of one sampled residents (Resident 44), reviewed for discharge. This failure placed the resident at risk for having an incomplete medical record. Findings included: Per the 03/15/2023 discharge assessment, Resident 44 was cognitively intact to make decisions regarding care, needed minimal to no assistance for completion of activities of daily living, and had received physical therapy and occupational therapy for two days. Record review showed Resident 44 was admitted to the facility for physical and occupational therapy following back surgery, and discharged home against medical advice on 03/15/2023. A progress note on 03/15/2023 at 4:52 PM showed the resident had informed the staff they were going home to complete their recovery with help from family. The resident was provided education related to the risk of leaving prior to completion of healing and therapy, and continued to insist on being discharged . Further record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor for the effectiveness of a sleep aid for one of five sampled residents (32), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This deficient practice placed the resident at risk of experiencing adverse side effects, and for receiving ineffective and/or unnecessary medications. Findings included . Review of the medical record showed Resident 32 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of compression fractures to the lumbar spine (back), Alzheimer's disease (a brain disorder that slowly destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually, the ability to carry out the simplest tasks), diabetes, and insomnia. Review of the comprehensive assessment completed on 01/31/2023 showed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and needed the extensive assistance of one-person for dressing, hygiene, toileting, bathing, and transfers. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for May 2023 showed an order for Melatonin (a sleep aid) three…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were disposed of timely, in accordance with currently accepted professional standards, in 1 medication storage room and 1 of 3 nursing carts (cart 2). This failure placed residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medication. Findings included . Per observation of the medication storage room, located at the main nursing station on 05/04/2023 at 2:32 PM, with Staff O, Registered Nurse, showed a medication used to treat nausea expired on 03/16/2023, Tylenol suppositories (a medication used to treat fever or pain), expired on 03/23/2021, and three bottles of a medication used to treat constipation expired on 02/2023. Per observation of medication cart 2 with Staff P, Registered Nurse (the same day), showed an expired bottle of Lantus Insulin (a medication used to treat diabetes). The open date on the Lantus Insulin was 04/03/2023, and once opened it was good for 28 days. The insulin was administered to Resident 32 on 05/02/2023, 05/03/2023 and 05/04/2023. The insulin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-05-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence of the required 12-hours of in-service training for 2 of 3 nursing assistants (Staff G and H), reviewed for staff competency. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of being cared for by inadequately trained staff, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Staff G> Review of the staff personnel file showed Staff G, Nursing Assistant (NA), was hired on 01/22/2020. Review of the facility's training records showed Staff G completed six hours of trainings and/or in-services between the dates of 08/24/2022 to 04/27/2023. <Staff H> Review of the staff personnel file showed Staff H, (NA), was hired on 03/04/2013. Review of the facility's training records showed Staff H completed eight hours of trainings and/or in-services between the dates of 08/24/2022 to 04/27/2023. During an interview on 05/10/2023 at 10:17 AM, Staff Q, Facility Operations Manager, stated there was not a current system in place to track NA annual training and in-servicing. Staff Q explained that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
CHENEY CARE COMMUNITYOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL100%since 04/22/1976
GESCHKE, GARYIndividualDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 10/01/1979
JULSEN, VANESSAIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2016
GANNON, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/03/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-21.1%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 58%Medicare 8%Other / private 34%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$512per resident / day
operating cost
$15,558per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$423per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505346. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next