No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Wesley Homes Des Moines Health Center

826 South 218th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198 · Non profit - Church related · 148 certified beds · (206) 824-3663 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (206) 824-3663 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609, F0610) — most recent Feb 2026Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0569)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
22000 Marine View Dr S Ste 200 · (206) 870-7331 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
627 S 227th St · (206) 878-2345 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
22511 Marine View Dr S · (206) 212-6985 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(541) 888-3778 · Typically dawn to dusk

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.0%14.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight1.4%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.1%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms67.0%17.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.7%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.5%17.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.9%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.5%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.1%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.5%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.7%15.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.3%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission14.7%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.1%13.4%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 140 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
68.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 68.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 129 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.2%CMS range 49.8–63.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.9%CMS range 5.9–13.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge68.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge68.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.0–10.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.831.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.98
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.93
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.79
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.69
RN hoursweekends
30.8%
Total nursing turnover
31.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 148 beds and averages 67.9 residents a day — about 46% occupied, or roughly 80 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.79 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.98 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.93 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.01 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.10 to 0.69 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-12)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

52 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-12 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident concerns were dealt with timely, verbal grievances were identified as such, resident rights were promoted periodically as required, and residents were provided the opportunity to make a grievance anonymously for 1 of 1 Resident Council groups reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet needs, frustration, untimely resolution of grievances, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .<Facility Policy>According to the facility's [DATE] Resident Council Meetings policy, the Activity Director would facilitate Resident Council Meetings. The policy showed the facility would act upon concerns and recommendations of the Council . According to the facility's [DATE] Resident and Family Grievances policy, a resident could make an anonymous grievance. The policy showed notices of residents' rights regarding grievances [would] be posted in prominent locations throughout thefacility. The policy showed all staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Level 2 Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) determinations (a process to determine whether mental health services were required after a Level 1 PASRR screening identified the need for a Level 2 review) were obtained for 3 (Residents 3, 9, & 63) of 5 residents whose PASRRs were reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving necessary mental health care and services. Findings included . <Facility Policy>Review of the facility's revised 02/11/2026 Resident Assessment-Coordination with PASRR program showed the facility must screen residents using the State's Level I screening process and refer any resident who had a mental disorder, intellectual disability, or related condition to the appropriate state designated authority for a Level 2 PASRR evaluation and determination. The Level 2 resident review must be completed within 40 calendar days of admission. The Social Services Director would be responsible for keeping track of each resident's PASRR screening status and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional standards of practice. The facility failed to: (1) label medications properly and dispose of expired medications and medical supplies timely for 1 of 2 medication carts (300 West) and 2 of 2 storage rooms (300 East and 300 West) reviewed; and (2) monitor medication refrigerator temperatures for 2 of 2 storage rooms (300 East and 300 West) reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk of receiving compromised medications with reduced or no potency, receiving care with degraded supplies, and experiencing an overall decline in quality of life.Findings included .<Facility Policy>According to the facility's 11/10/2022 Medication Storage policy, the facility would remove and dispose of expired medications and equipment promptly, and medication refrigerators would be monitored per the facility's procedure for ensuring temperatures remained within the required range.<300 East Medication Storage> <Medication Refrigerator>…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: ensure staff posted and followed Transmission Based Precautions (TBP - a set of infection control practices used to prevent the spread of infectious agents, in addition to standard precautions) for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 40) reviewed for TBP; ensure staff used appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE - disposable barriers such as gloves, eyewear, and gowns used to prevent exposure to infectious materials) for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 44) reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms); and ensure staff used appropriate Hand Hygiene (HH) during meal service. These failures placed residents and staff at risk for exposure to and development of communicable infectious diseases.Findings included .<Facility Policy>Review of the facility's revised 07/26/2024 Transmission-Based Isolation Precautions policy showed the facility would implement TBP to prevent the spread of pathogens (organisms that enter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents' medication regimens were free of chemical restraints for 1 of 5 (Resident 11) residents whose medication regimens were reviewed. This failure left residents at risk for unneeded psychotropic medications, sedation, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy>According to the facility's revised 02/19/2025 Use of Psychotropic Medications policy, psychotropic medications affected brain function and should only be used to treat a specific, diagnosed, and documented condition for which the medication was beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documentation of the resident's response to the medication. The policy showed when a resident needed a psychotropic medication, their record must include a rationale for use, and the effects of the use of a psychotropic medication must evaluated on an ongoing basis.<Resident 11>According to the 12/30/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure comprehensive Care Plans (CPs) were developed and implemented for 5 (Residents 85, 44, 38, 10, & 9) of 20 sample residents reviewed. The failure to ensure all care needs were addressed by the CP placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, and frustration. Findings included .<Resident 85> According to the 02/10/2026 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 85 admitted to the facility after a surgical procedure involving their digestive system. The MDS showed Resident 38 had lower abdominal pain and a surgical wound. Review of Resident 85's comprehensive CP showed no directions to staff to provide post-surgical care of, or interventions for staff to monitor Resident 38's digestive system In an interview on 02/06/2026 at 7:57 AM, Resident 85 stated they had new pain in their abdomen and thought it could be related to gas pain from a surgery of their colon. Resident 85 stated some of the staff were very helpful in assisting them, however others did not seem to know them. Resident 85…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided within professional standards of nursing for 2 (Residents 8 & 63) of 5 residents whose medication regimen was reviewed. The failure to ensure orders were clarified when needed placed residents at risk for unneeded care and unmet care needs. Findings included . <Facility Policy>According to facility's 02/19/2025 Use Of Medications(s) policy, psychotropic medications should only be used after a practitioner determined that the medication(s) was appropriate to treat a resident's specific, diagnosed, and documented condition.<Clarifying Orders><Resident 8>According to the 11/22/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 8 had diagnoses including a stroke history, an intestinal obstruction, and a history of digestive surgery. The MDS showed Resident 8 had an ileostomy (a surgical hole through which waste passes directly from the small intestine). Record review showed the following physician's orders for Resident 8: a 11/19/2025 order to change Resident 8's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received the assistance they were assessed to require with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for 1 (Resident 78) of 2 residents reviewed for ADL. This failure placed residents at risk for poor hygiene, odors, skin irritation, and a diminished sense of self-worth.Findings included .<Facility Policy>According to the revised 07/26/2024 ADL Policy, the facility would provide the care and services residents were assessed to require related to bathing, dressing, and grooming. The policy showed residents who could not carry out their own ADL would receive the help they needed.<Resident 78>According to the 12/15/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 78 had moderately impaired cognition and limited range of motion in their left arm and leg. This MDS showed Resident 78 was dependent on staff for transferring from their bed to a chair and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. The MDS showed bathing preferences were very important for Resident 78.In an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring for fluid overload and edema (an abnormal buildup of fluid in bodily tissue) for 1 (Resident 38) of 2 residents reviewed for edema and failed to monitor oxygen therapy for 1 (Resident 38) of 2 residents receiving oxygen therapy. These failures to monitor for edema and to provide oxygen monitoring left residents at risk for respiratory discomfort, oxygen-related accidents, infection, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included. <Facility Policy>Review of the facility's revised 07/26/2024 Edema management policy showed the facility would manage edema by assessing the resident and following the medical practitioner's orders.Review of the facility's revised 07/09/2024 Oxygen Administration policy, showed oxygen therapy should be administered under orders of a physician. The policy showed staff would document the ongoing assessment of the resident's conditions warranting oxygen and their response to oxygen therapy. Staff were to document how often to administer oxygen such as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received the care and services necessary to ensure their safety for 1 (Resident 11) of 1 residents reviewed for elopement risks. The failure placed the resident at risk for elopement, lack of supervision, and accidents.Findings included .<Facility Policy>According to the facility's revised 07/26/2024 Elopement and Wandering Residents policy, the facility would ensure all residents who wandered or were assessed to be at risk for elopement would receive the supervision they needed to prevent accidents. The policy showed residents would be assessed for wandering risk upon admission and a person-centered Care Plan (CP) with interventions developed to minimize risks associated with wandering.<Resident 11>According to the 12/30/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - An assessment tool) Resident 11 sometimes understood others and was sometimes understood during conversation. The MDS showed Resident 11 was assessed to have severely impaired cognition and behavior including wandering. The MDS showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nurse and nurse aide staff had the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing and related services, to assure resident safety, and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident according to the facility assessment, resident-specific assessments and resident plans of care for 7 of 7 staff (Staff H, I, J & K - Nurse Aids and Staff E, G, & R - Licensed Nurses) reviewed for competency. The failure to develop and implement a process to evaluate staff's competency and skills to perform job expectations, including medication pass evaluation of competency, placed residents at risk for medication errors, accidents, injuries, infections, diminished quality of life, and diminished quality of care. Findings included . The 2024 Facility Assessment review date 09/08/2024 showed training/education and competencies of nurses and nurse aides that were necessary to provide support and care to the residents of the facility. Registered Nurse (RN) training and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a facility-wide system for Antibiotic (ABO) Stewardship (a program to improve how ABO medications are prescribed, treating bacterial infections, and reduce the inappropriate use of ABO medications). The facility failed to implement an accurate surveillance method to track all resident infections, identify the source of infections, collect diagnostic data for organisms and ensure correct ABO treatment, identify residents' symptoms and use nationally recognized assessment criteria for prescribing ABO medications, monitor isolation precaution timelines, identifying trends in types infections or similar organisms, analyze data collected to provide ABO and infection reports to the prescribers of antibiotics. This failure placed residents at risk for potential adverse outcomes associated with the inappropriate/unnecessary use of ABOs and an increased risk for ABO resistant organisms. Findings included . Review of the facility policy Antibiotic Stewardship Program dated 07/10/2024 showed the facility implemented an ABO…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL), related to cleanliness and grooming for 5 (Residents 2, 3, 24, 35, & 37) of 17 sample residents reviewed for ADLs. Facility failure to provide residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with showers, shaving, and nail care, placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene, long facial hair, embarrassment, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, revised 07/26/2024, the facility would provide ADLs in accordance with resident's comprehensive assessment, Care Plan (CP), and resident's needs and choices to ensure a resident's ADL abilities would not deteriorate unless deterioration in function was unavoidable. <Resident 2> According to the 07/30/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 2 had weakness on right side of the body related to a stroke and required maximal assistance with personal hygiene including showers. The MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement an infection prevention and control program to prevent, identify, report, investigate, and control infections and communicable diseases according to national standards. The failure to implement a system of surveillance designed to identify possible communicable diseases and infections before they could spread to other persons in the facility, implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) to prevent the spread of infections for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 33 & 212), and ensure staff used Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) as required placed all residents at risk for facility-acquired or healthcare-associated infections and related complications. Findings included . <Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP)> Review of the Facility Assessment, revised 09/08/2024, showed the facility infection prevention and control (IPC) program would effectively prevent, identify, report, investigate, and control infections and communicable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement and maintain an in-service training program that ensured 4 of 4 Nursing Aides (Staff H, I, J & K) completed the required training, including dementia care management and training for special needs of residents, to ensure continued competency when providing resident care. The failure to provide nurse aides the required training on hire, provide no less than 12 hours of continuing education annually, and perform annual performance evaluations to address weak areas for additional training placed residents at risk for less than competent care and services from nurse aide staff. Findings included . The 2024 Facility Assessment (FA), review date 09/08/2024, showed Nurse Aides (NA) would require training/education and competency to provide support and care needed to the resident population. The FA listed the following training/ education needs: basic personal care skills, vital signs monitoring, safety and mobility, communication and empathy, infection control, emergency protocols, and cultural competency. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure informed consent (a process explaining the risks and benefits of a treatment prior to use) was obtained prior to administration of psychotropic (affecting mental state) medications for 3 of 5 residents (Resident 53, 212, & 213) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This placed residents at risk for unwanted treatment. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to a facility policy titled, Use of Psychotropic Medication, revised 07/02/2024, the facility would develop psychotropic medication regimens in collaboration with residents/resident representatives. The policy showed residents/resident representatives would be educated on the risks and benefits of psychotropic drug use, as well as alternative treatments/nonpharmacological interventions. According to a facility policy titled Promoting/Maintaining Resident Self-Determination, revised 07/29/2024, the facility would ensure each resident had the opportunity to exercise their autonomy. The policy showed the residents rights to determine what, if anything, they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and rule out abuse/neglect for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 31) reviewed for abuse investigations. Facility's failure to complete a thorough investigation and provide feedback regarding the resident's concerns placed residents at risk for potential abuse and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, revised June 10 2024, showed the facility would implement processes to prevent and prohibit all types of abuse or neglect and establish a safe environment. The facility would rule out abuse and neglect by use of identification, assessments, and care planning for appropriate interventions. The policy showed the facility would monitor residents with needs and behaviors which might lead to conflict, and the facility would provide information to staff and residents on how and to whom concerns would be reported. The policy also showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system by which residents/representatives received required written notices at the time of transfer/discharge, or as soon as practicable for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 16, 35, & 46) reviewed for hospitalizations. Failure to ensure written notification to the resident and/or the resident's representative of the reasons for the discharge in writing and in a language and manner they understood, placed residents at risk for a discharge that was not in alignment with the resident's stated goals for care and preferences. Findings included . <Facility Policy> A facility policy titled, Transfer, and Discharge (including AMA) revised on 08/08/2024, showed a notice of transfer/discharge must be provided to the resident/representative when an emergency transfer to an acute care facility is ordered. The policy showed the notice would include the specific reason and basis for transfer, date of transfer, and name of the hospital to which the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) process (a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who had a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities were offered the most appropriate setting for their needs [in the community, a nursing facility, or acute care setting]; and received the services they need in those settings), was followed for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 213) sampled for PASRR review. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving specialized mental health services, unidentified mental health needs and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 213> According to the 10/05/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 213 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple complex conditions that included psychiatric mood disorder and confusion. Review of Care Area assessment dated [DATE] showed resident had confusion, behavior and mood disorder. Review of physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a process to determine if a potential nursing home resident had mental health/intellectual disability needs which required further assessment/treatment) assessment was accurate to reflect the resident's mental health condition for 1 of 3 (Resident's 14) residents reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed residents at risk for inappropriate nursing home placement and /or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health needs. Findings included . <Resident 14> According to a 09/19/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 14 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The assessment showed Resident 14 had diagnoses of, but not limited to, non-Alzheimer's dementia, Seizure disorder, Psychotic disorder, delusional disorders, and unspecified mental disorder due to unknown physiological condition. The MDS showed Resident 14 received antipsychotic medications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement a comprehensive Care Plan (CP) for 2 of 18 sampled residents (Residents 53, 2 ) whose comprehensive CPs were reviewed. The failure to develop comprehensive, individualized CPs with resident-specific goals and/or interventions placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 53> According to a 09/13/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 53 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The assessment showed Resident 53 was severely cognitively impaired and had a diagnosis of, but not limited to, pain in right hip and other chronic pain. The MDS showed Resident 53 received scheduled and as needed pain medication and was observed to express symptoms of pain three to four days during the seven-day assessment period. Review of Resident 53's records showed a physician order for scheduled pain medication to be administered routinely In an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Care Plans (CPs) were accurately reviewed and revised to reflect current resident status and needs as required for 3 (Residents 24, 213, & 212) of 17 residents reviewed for CP's. This failure left residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 24> According to the 09/23/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 24 had a Pressure Ulcer (PU) on their sacrum (triangular bone at base of spine, upper buttocks). The MDS showed Resident 24 required maximal assistance with bed mobility and toileting needs. Review of the 08/09/2024 Skin CP showed Resident 24 had a sacrum PU and was at risk for new PU development. Nursing interventions included Resident 24 needed to be repositioned at least every two hours and more often with two staff members. Observations on 10/22/2024 at 8:33 AM and 11:12 AM, on 10/23/2024 at 8:24 AM and 12:33 PM, and on 10/24/2024 at 8:55…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was free of accident hazards for 2 of 2 residents sampled for accidents (Resident 213, & 212). The failure to ensure supervision of wandering residents and safety of transfer pole device was accurately assessed for safety placed residents at risk for accidents, injury, and negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to a facility policy titled, Elopements and Wandering Residents, revised 07/26/2024, the facility would ensure that residents who exhibit wandering behavior or were at risk for elopement received adequate supervision to prevent accidents in accordance with their person-centered plan of care to address the factors contributing to wandering. The policy showed staff would develop interventions to increase staff awareness of resident's risk, all risks would be added to the resident's Care Plan (CP) and communicated to the staff. The effectiveness of interventions would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 212) with urinary catheters (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) received care and services consistent with professional standards of care. The failure of the facility to ensure physician orders with a supporting diagnosis, routine catheter care and monitoring was provided, placed the residents at risk for infections, skin breakdown, and diminished quality of care. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility policy titled, Catheter Care, dated 07/26/2024, showed the purpose of the policy was to ensure that residents with indwelling catheters received appropriate catheter care when indwelling catheters was in use. <Resident 212> Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 10/10/2024 showed that Resident 212 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with muscle weakness, Parkinson's disease (movement disorder), lack of coordination,and had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 33) reviewed for pain management received the necessary treatment, services, and follow-up care to manage their pain during wound care. This failure placed residents at risk for avoidable pain, refusal of wound treatments and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility policy titled, Pressure Injury Prevention and Management, revised 08/09/2024, showed the facility would utilize a systematic approach for pressure injury prevention and management, including using evidence-based treatments with current standards of process for treatment decisions based on condition of the wound, including the presence of pain. Modifications of interventions would be considered for resident's non-compliance to treatment. <Resident 33> According to the 07/26/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), Resident 33 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with loss of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — isolated
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff with a Nursing Assistant Registered (NAR) certificate completed a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) class and passed the state license exam within four months of hire for 2 of 2 NAR staff (Staff J & L) reviewed for CNA licensure. This failure placed residents at risk to receive care from unlicensed staff. Findings included . The facility staff list provided on 10/21/2024 showed Staff J & L were both hired as NARs on 04/09/2024. Review of the 10/28/2024 the Washington State Provider Credential Search website showed Staff L was currently a NAR, not a CNA. The verification showed Staff L was first credentialed as a NAR on 08/05/2021 with renewal on 01/02/2024. Review of the 10/28/2024 the Washington State Provider Credential Search website showed Staff J was currently a NAR, not a CNA. The website showed Staff J was first credentialed on 08/07/2023 and last renewal was on 01/10/2024. Review of the daily schedules for 10/2024 showed Staff J and Staff L both were scheduled and worked with residents as NARs. In an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 (Residents 3, 35, & 53) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, were free from unnecessary psychotropic (medication that affected behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) medications. This failure left residents at risk for unnecessary medications, adverse side effects, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's Use of Psychotropic Medication policy revised 07/08/2024, showed the facility would not give psychotropic medications to their residents unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition and the indications for use would be documented in resident's medical record. The policy showed supportive documentation included non-pharmacological interventions addressed prior to initiating a psychotropic medication. <Resident 3> According to the 07/11/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 3 had diagnoses of Schizophrenia (disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 Percent (%). Failure to properly administer 28 of 35 medications for 4 of 6 residents (Resident 54, 6, 44 and 163) observed during medication pass resulted in a medication error rate of 68 %. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving the correct dose at the correct time or receiving less than the intended therapeutic effects of physician ordered medication. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the 01/2024 facility, Medication Administration policy showed medications should be administered in accordance with written orders of the prescriber. The six rights of medication administration were to be followed that included the right time and right documentation. Staff were to administer medication within 60 minutes prior to or after scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by the physician. Staff were to report and document discrepancies and report to the nurse manager. Observations of medication pass on 10/23/2024 at 1:37 PM, showed Staff G…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary orders pertaining to the consistency of foods were implemented for 3 of 6 (Residents 34, 37, & 45) residents whose dietary intake was reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for choking, poor nutritional intake, and weight loss. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to a facility policy titled, Resident Food Services - Special Food Needs, Swallowing/Chewing Difficulties, and Food Allergies, revised 01/2024, showed all foods and beverages would be assessed and determined safe for residents with special dietary needs, including those with food allergies, cultural and religious dietary preferences, and/or swallowing/chewing difficulty. The policy showed nursing would communicate diet orders, dietary staff would ensure diet information was transferred to meal ticket identifying residents diet order, food allergies, and special instructions. The policy showed dining staff would follow diet orders, allergies,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food in accordance with food service safety standards. The failure to cover, label and date stored foods, maintain clean ceiling vents, and perform standard hand hygiene and glove use to prevent cross-contamination placed residents at risk of foodborne illness and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Food Preparation> Observation on 10/25/2024 at 9:31 AM showed Staff AA (Cook) wearing plastic gloves over knitted safety gloves and washing raw chicken at the prep sink. Staff AA left the sink, did not remove the contaminated gloves or wash their hands, then touched a large spoon to stir the soup on the stovetop, left the spoon in the soup, turned and touched the three soup warming pans on a cart by the stove, picked up a plastic bag of frozen corn and placed it in a pan on the prep table, walked to the other side of the kitchen and returned to the sink, still wearing the same contaminated gloves. In an interview on 10/25/2024 at 9:36 AM, Staff AA was still wearing the plastic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure 2 of 3 garbage dumpsters and 1 of 2 recycling dumpsters were properly covered, the surrounding areas were kept clean, and free of trash/debris and food scraps. These failures placed the facility at risk of attracting bugs, rodents, birds, and other disease-carrying germs/bacteria that could reproduce, grow, and place the residents at risk for acquiring these diseases. Findings included . Observations on 10/21/2024, 10/22/2024, 10/23/2024, 10/24/2024, 10/25/2024, 10/28/2024 and 10/29/2024 showed the outside refuse area with uncovered garbage dumpsters and uncovered recycle dumpsters. Observations on these dates showed sea gulls (birds) flying over the dumpsters, opening the garbage bags for food scraps. These observations showed trash such as plastic, paper, gloves, food scraps, and other debris on the concrete surrounding the dumpsters. In an observation and interview on 10/29/2024 at 11:18 AM, Staff P (Director of Environmental Services) observed the refuse area and stated the dumpsters should be covered, the ground…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and transported in a sanitary manner, and in accordance with professional standards of food safety. The failure to ensure food was stored appropriately, discarded when expired, and covered as required left residents at risk of food contamination and food-borne illness. Findings included . <Policy> According to the facility's revised January 2023 Food and Supply Storage Policy, staff should cover, label, and date unused food and open packages of food. The policy directed staff to complete all sections of the label including a use-by date. <Dry Food Storage, 1st Kitchen> During initial kitchen rounds on 08/01/2023 from 8:54 AM until 9:42 AM with Staff GG (Director of Culinary Services) the following was observed: -One open 32-ounce bag of dry roasted peanut topping with no open date, marked as received 08/10/2022. Staff GG stated staff should label open packages with the date the item was opened. -Two cans of chili with beans marked by facility as received 05/29/2022 and a third…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-08 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update the Facility Assessment (FA - a required document that comprehensively assesses the levels and types of care provided, the demographic profile of the resident population, and the numbers and competencies required of the staff) to accurately reflect the resources the facility determined were necessary for day-to-day and emergency operations. This failure placed the residents at risk for not receiving needed care, services, and resources. Findings included . Review of the updated 09/07/2022 FA provided by the facility during the entrance conference showed the FA included outdated information, including the following: - The FA showed the facility had 5 halls: the 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 halls, and described the 400 Hall as a secured unit. The FA did not reflect that the 300 and 400 halls were now closed. - The resident demographic information gathered using data from 05/01/2022 to 07/31/2022 showed the only language spoken by the resident population was English and did not reflect the facility had current residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Observations on 08/04/2023 at 10:23 AM, showed Staff X (CNA) providing incontinence care for Resident 47 in the resident's shared bathroom. Staff X wore gloves and used a wet, soapy washcloth to assist with cleaning the resident's bottom area. After completing incontinence care, Staff X picked up a new brief and put it on the resident while wearing the same soiled gloves. Staff X continued wearing the same soiled gloves to pull up Resident 47's pants, then touched the door handle to the bathroom to open the door, locked the brakes on the resident's wheelchair, touched the handle of a walker, adjusted the footrests for the wheelchair, and then emptied the basin that was used for the soapy water prior to removing the soiled gloves. Staff X, without performing HH, was observed picking up Resident 47's toothbrush, applied toothpaste and handed it to the resident. Staff X did not perform HH until they went to exit Resident 47's room. In an interview on 08/04/2023 at 10:39 AM, Staff X confirmed they did not perform HH after assisting with incontinence care and stated, I should have. In an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-08-08 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was a designated Infection Preventionist (IP) who worked at least part-time at the facility responsible for the facility's effective Infection Control and Prevention Program (IPCP) including early detection of infections, analysis of evidence-based infection surveillance data, implementation of infection prevention measures, and management of healthcare associated infections such as Antibiotic (ABO) Stewardship and Infection Surveillance including Legionella (a severe form of lung inflammation caused by a bacterial infection). These failures and the lack of leadership without a fully functional IPCP placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . In an interview on 08/03/2023 at 12:42 PM, Staff B (Director of Nursing - DON) stated they were hired as the full-time DON. Staff B stated they were also the acting IP in the facility and were responsible for the facility's IPCP as described in their job description to perform other duties assigned by the Corporate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-08 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide privacy during personal care for 1 of 19 (Resident 1) residents and to cover Foley Catheter bags (FC- a tube placed in the bladder to drain urine into urinary bag), to ensure dignity for 3 of 5 (Resident 3, 1, and 59) residents. Failure to provide personal privacy placed residents at risk of feelings of institutionalization and a diminished quality of life. <Facility Policy> The facility's undated Resident Rights policy showed residents should be treated with dignity and respect and had a right to personal privacy that included their medical treatment. <Catheter Bag Privacy Cover> <Resident 3> Review of the 06/13/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed Resident 3 had a diagnosis of obstructive uropathy (obstructed urinary flow) and was admitted to the facility with a FC. Observation on 08/03/2023 at 5:28 PM showed Resident 3 had a FC in place and urinary bag hooked on the bed without a privacy bag cover in place. Record review on 08/07/2023 Physician Orders (PO) showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident rooms had access to fresh air, were clean, free of clutter, and provided a homelike environment for 2 of 3 units (200 Hall and 500 Hall). These failures left residents at risk for feelings of institutionalization, decreased quality of life, and a less than homelike environment. Findings include . <Windows> Observations on 08/01/2023 at 9:38 AM showed room [ROOM NUMBER] had a torn window screen, and the left window did not latch. On 08/01/2023 at 9:59 AM, observation showed room [ROOM NUMBER], 214, and 216 windows bolted closed, residents were unable to open them for fresh air. <Cleanliness> Observation on 08/01/2023 at 9:38 AM showed light fixtures with globes contained dead bugs in rooms 208, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 214, 215, and 216. The sconce lights and florescent lighting on the 200-hall showed they contained dead bugs in every fixture. room [ROOM NUMBER] had brown splats on the ceiling above the residents' beds.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 3 of 6 (Residents 59,12 & 33) residents reviewed for Restorative Nursing Programs (RNP) received the care and services they were assessed to require. These failures placed residents at risks for declines in Range of Motion (ROM) or functional status, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Resident 59> According to the 07/05/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 59 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had multiple medical diagnoses including weakness and deconditioning from a bladder infection. The MDS showed Resident 59 had intact memory and was able to communicate and understand effectively. Review of Resident 59's rehabilitation documentation showed Resident 59 received skilled Physical Therapy (PT) and Occupational Therapy (OT) services from 06/28/2023 until 07/20/2023. A 07/20/2023 Restorative Program referral form showed Resident 59 was placed on a RNP to maintain their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to ensure the environment was free of accident hazards on 3 (100 Hall, 200 Hall & 500 Hall) of 3 units. The failure to ensure chemicals and razors were safely secured left residents at risk for accidents with a potential for injuries. Findings included . Observation on the 100 Hall on 08/01/2023 at 1:03 PM showed an unnamed storage room across from room [ROOM NUMBER] had a keypad lock and handle installed. The door freely opened without a code being entered. Inside the storage room [ROOM NUMBER] chlorine wipe dispensers, 8 germicidal wipe dispensers, and a bottle of a solution used to dispose of medications were observed. The medication-disposal solution included a warning that read Ingestion of this product will induce vomiting. In an interview and observation on 08/01/2023 at 1:11 PM, Staff A (Administrator) and Staff B (Director of Nursing) noted the presence of the wipes and the medication-disposal solution, confirmed they represented a potential hazard,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-08 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to put into practice protocols necessary to optimize the treatment of infections that ensured Residents 2, 42, & 7, who required the use of an antibiotic (ABO), were prescribed the appropriate ABO. The facility failed to implement a facility-wide system that monitored the use of ABOs. These failures placed residents at risk of adverse events and the development of ABO-resistant organisms from unnecessary or inappropriate ABO use. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 04/2021 ABO Stewardship Program policy, the Infection Preventionist (IP), with oversight from the Director of Nursing (DON), served as the leader of the ABO Stewardship Program and received support from the Administrator and other governing officials of the facility. The policy outlined the use of protocols and systems to monitor ABO use including a communication process for physician notification, laboratory testing in accordance with the current standards of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure funds were reimbursed to the state Office of Financial Recovery (OFR), within 30 days of resident discharge or death, for 2 (Residents 317 & 316) of 4 discharged residents reviewed. This failure caused a delay in reconciling residents' accounts within 30 days as required. Findings included . According to an undated facility, Resident Personal Funds policy, upon the discharge or death of a resident with personal funds deposited with the facility, the facility would, within 30 days, send the resident's funds and a final account of those funds to the resident, or in the case of death, the individual or probate jurisdiction administering the resident's estate, in accordance with State Law. <Resident 317> Record review showed Resident 317 passed away and was discharged from the facility on 11/28/2022. Review of Resident 317's January 2023 trust statement showed the resident's balance of $232.76 was not transferred to the OFR until 01/17/2023, almost two months after discharge. <Resident 316> Record review showed Residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed and provided written information concerning the right to accept, refuse, or formulate an Advanced Directive (AD - legal documents reflecting a resident's wishes if they became incapacitated) for 4 (Residents 9, 12, 7, & 10) of 19 residents reviewed for ADs. The failure to offer assistance or choose to refuse to formulate an AD placed residents at risk of not having a Power of Attorney (POA - surrogate decision maker) when unable to make their own healthcare or financial decisions. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the revised December 2016 Advance Directives facility policy showed upon admission, residents were provided with written information concerning the right to formulate an AD. The policy stated facility staff would offer assistance with formulating an AD, the resident would be given the option to accept or decline the assistance, and nursing staff would document in the medical record the offer to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to notify State Survey Agency (SA) of an unwitnessed fall with injury in an area not generally vulnerable to trauma for 1 of (Resident 1) residents reviewed for falls. Failure to notify SA of unwitnessed injury put residents at risk for uninvestigated potential abuse. Findings included . <Abuse Policy> The revised 10/05/2022 facility abuse policy showed possible indicators of abuse included physical injury of a resident with no known cause. The policy showed the facility would report all alleged violations of potential abuse to the SA immediately, but no later than two hours after an event with serious bodily injury. <Resident1> Observation on 08/04/2023 at 8:04 AM showed Resident 1 with a forehead laceration and yellow bruising to corner of left eye. Review of a 07/19/2023 facility incident report showed Resident 1 had an unwitnessed fall and sustained an injury to their face. This report showed the SA was not notified. In an interview on 08/07/2023 at 1:50 PM Staff B (Director of Nursing) stated Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed ensure a system by which the office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) received required resident transfer information for 1 of 1 (Resident 3) residents reviewed for hospitalization. Failure to ensure required notification was completed, prevented the LTCO from educating and advocating for residents regarding their rights. Findings included . In an interview on 08/02/2023 at 9:50 AM, Resident 3 stated they were sent to the hospital about one month ago. Record review showed Resident 3 was sent to the hospital on [DATE]. In an interview on 08/08/2023 at 11:50 AM, Staff A (Administrator) stated social services should be notifying the LTCO monthly of all facility-initiated transfers or discharges. In an interview on 08/08/2023 at 11:58 AM, Staff D (Social Worker) stated they were not notifying the LTCO of any facility-initiated discharges since they started working at the facility in June 2023. REFERENCE: WAC 388-97-0120 (2)(a-d), -1040…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure baseline Care Plans (Baseline CP - individualized instructions for resident care nursing homes are required to complete for each resident within 48 hours of admission) were developed for 1 (Resident 65) of 1 residents reviewed for discharge. The failure to develop a baseline CP left the resident at risk for unmet care needs, frustration, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Resident 65> According to the 06/23/2023 Entry Tracking Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 65 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to a 06/23/2023 progress note, Resident 65 admitted to the facility on [DATE] at 3:00 PM. According to 06/26/2023 progress note Resident 65 discharged against medical advice that on 06/26/2023 at 3:24 PM. The discharge occurred over 72 hours after admission, and more than 24 hours after the Baseline CP was required to be complete. Resident 65's record included a 06/23/2023 Baseline CP. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure comprehensive Care Plans (CPs) were developed for 2 of 19 (Residents 24 & 47) sample residents whose CPs were reviewed. These failures left residents at risk for unmet care needs and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Resident 24> According to the 05/09/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 24 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS showed Resident 24 had diagnoses including heart failure and malnutrition. Review of the April 2017 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed Resident 24 tested positive for Tuberculosis (TB - a highly infectious respiratory disease) skin test on 04/11/2017. Record review showed the facility obtained a chest x-ray on 04/12/2017 that demonstrated there was no evidence of an active TB infection for Resident 24. The 04/12/2017 TB symptom screener showed Resident 24 did not show any signs or symptoms of an active TB infection. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure care planning meetings were conducted routinely and Care Plans (CP) were maintained, revised, and updated as required for 3 (Residents 47, 9, & 12) of 19 sampled residents. This failure left residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 47> According to a 07/03/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 47 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including a history of falling, fractures, and lung disease. This MDS showed staff assessed Resident 47 with falls and a fracture prior to admission and the resident was always incontinent of bladder. In an interview on 08/01/2023 at 11:53 AM, Resident 47 stated they fell at home before admission to the facility. According to a 07/07/2023 Fall Care Area Assessment, staff documented Resident 47 was at risk for falls and this would be addressed on the resident's CP. Review of Resident 47's 07/07/2023 risk for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide services according to professional standards; ensure Physician's Orders (POs) were followed for 2 of 16 sample residents (Residents 47 & 7), or clarified for 1 of 16 sample residents (Resident 47), monitor the behaviors for a new diagnosis for 1 of 16 residents (Resident 9) whose care was reviewed, monitor an alteration in skin integrity for 1 of 4 (Resident 1) residents and ensure proper settings and function of air mattresses for 3 of 4 (Residents 1, 3, and 41) residents. These failures left residents at risk for not receiving the care they required, infection, accidents with potential for injuries, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Clarifying Physician Orders> <Resident 47> According to a 07/03/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 47 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including fractures and required the use of a narcotic pain medication during the assessment period. Review of June 2023 Medication Administration Records (MAR) showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) were provided as residents were assessed to require for 3 of 19 (Residents 33, 9 & 41) dependent residents reviewed for ADLs. Facility failure to provide bathing (Resident 33 & 9) and communication (Resident 41) assistance left residents at risk for poor hygiene, and frustration. Findings included . <Resident 33> According to the 07/07/2023 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 33 was assessed with severely impaired cognition, and had diagnoses including heart failure, arthritis, Alzheimer's disease, and functional quadriplegia (paralysis of all four limbs). The MDS showed Resident 33 was assessed with unclear speech, and to rarely be understood or to understand others. The MDS showed Resident 33 did not receive bathing assistance during the 7-day lookback period. The revised 10/25/2022 ADL self-care performance deficit . Care Plan (CP) showed Resident 33 preferred showers two times a week, and as needed. The CP directed staff to provide a sponge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess for bladder needs to alert and oriented residents for a toileting program for 1 of 4 (Resident 12) residents. The facility failed to ensure residents with Foley Catheters (FC- a tube placed in the bladder to drain urine) received appropriate care and services for 1 of 5 (Resident 59) residents reviewed for indwelling FCs. The failure to assess the residents for toileting programs and obtain and follow Physician Orders (PO) for FCs care placed residents at risk for infection and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 12> According to the 05/15/2023 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 12 admitted to the facility on [DATE], was assessed to make their own decision, was understood, and able to understand the conversation. The MDS showed Resident 12 required two-person extensive assistance from staff for bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. The MDS showed Resident 12 was always incontinent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were secured, dated when opened, and expired medications and biologicals were disposed of timely for 2 of 4 medication carts, 1 of 2 medication rooms, and 1 of 64 resident rooms reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving expired medications, medication errors, adverse side effects of medications, or not receiving the full effect of their medications. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to a revised 11/10/2022 Medication Storage facility policy, all drugs and biologicals would be stored in locked compartments. Medications would be under the direct supervision of the person administering the medications. The policy showed medications for external use would be stored separately from medications administered internally and medications administered by mouth would be stored separately from medications administered by other routes such as eye drops or injectables. All medication rooms…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident dietary preferences and food allergies were honored for 2 (Residents 59 and 41) of 19 sample residents. This failure left residents at risk for frustration, allergic reactions to food, and weight loss. Findings included . <Resident 59> According to the 07/05/2023 admission MDS, Resident 59 had intact memory and was able to communicate and understand effectively. The MDS showed Resident 59 did not have any chewing or swallowing difficulty and was on a therapeutic diet (a meal plan that controlled the intake of certain foods or nutrients). The 06/30/2023 Nutrition Care Plan (CP) identified Resident 59 as at risk for altered nutrition and instructed staff to honor Resident 59's food preferences within the resident's diet regimen. The 06/30/2023 Nutrition Assessment showed Resident 59's food preferences were obtained by staff. On 08/01/2023 at 12:57 PM, Resident 59 was observed eating lunch in their room. Resident 59's plate had vegetable salad and pushed on one side were sliced fresh tomatoes.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CANDALLA, ALEXIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 08/17/2015
ANDERSON, KEVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/13/2007
DECKMAN, ROSSIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2018
FLAGEL, JERRYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2019
GARRETT, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2014
HARMON, JOEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
MAGNUSON, DENNISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2014
MCGILLIARD, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/05/2000
MICHAELIS, LYNNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/01/2019
NELSON-PETERSON, DANAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2019
ROGEL, EDWARDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2014
ROTTLE, JEANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2014
SEARING, TIMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
STORMS, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 11/01/2014
WINDSOR, MONTEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2019
WESLEY HOMES DES MOINES LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 08/13/2007

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$32.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-7.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$778K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 5%Medicare 8%Other / private 87%

This home reported $778K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$1,506per resident / day
operating cost
$45,785per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$1,404per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505475. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-12, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next