No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Columbia Basin Hospital

200 Nat Washington Way, Ephrata, WA 98823 · Government - County · 12 certified beds · (509) 754-4631 Medicaid only — no Medicare

Call the home — (509) 754-4631 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — most recent Apr 2026
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (31) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
314 Basin St SW · (509) 754-7186 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Rite Aid0.6 mi
250 Basin St SW · (509) 754-3513 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
444 Division Avenue East, - · (509) 717-2013 · Call to confirm hours
Park
780 A St SE · (509) 754-3456 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased27.8%14.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.5%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.7%1.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms13.5%17.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.7%2.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication45.0%12.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%4.3%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control42.1%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table18.4%15.1%17.1%typical

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Staffing

0.94
RN hours/ resident / day
0.90
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.38
Aide hours/ resident / day
5.22
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.90
RN hoursweekends
31.3%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 12 beds and averages 11.9 residents a day — about 99% occupied, or roughly 0 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.22 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.94 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.38 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.25 on weekdays — 2% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.95 to 0.90 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-04-24)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2025-03-14)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-04-24 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — widespread
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure refrigerated medications were stored at proper temperatures in 1 of 1 medication refrigerator. The failure placed residents at risk of medications that could cause unintended outcomes due to improper storage. Findings Include. Review of the TUBERSOL(R) Tuberculin Purified Protein Derivative ([PPD], a serum used in a skin test to help diagnose tuberculosis infection) manufacturer's package insert showed the medication should be stored as follows: Refrigeration: Store at 2 degrees to 8 degrees Celsius (C) (35degrees to 46 degrees Fahrenheit [F]). No Freezing: Do not freeze; discard if the product has been exposed to freezing temperatures. Light Protection: Always protect from light (e.g., store in a brown paper bag). Opened Vial Stability: Once opened, the vial should be discarded after 30 days. Do not use after expiration date. During an observation and concurrent interview on 04/21/2026 at 12:43 PM, in the medication room a medication refrigerator showed two boxes of Tubersol on the inside the door of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice of Non-Coverage (SNF ABN) for 3 of 3 residents (Resident 2. 10, and 12) reviewed for Beneficiary Notices. This failure placed residents and/or their representatives at risk of not having adequate information to make financial decisions related to the residents' stay within the facility. Findings included . Resident 2 Review of the medical record showed Resident 2 had been discharged to hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. There was no documentation in the record to show that Resident 2 had been provided with a SNF ABN. Resident 10 Review of the medical record showed Resident 10 had been discharged to a lesser care setting on 02/17/2026. There was no documentation in the record to show that Resident 10 had been provided with a SNF ABN. Resident 12 Review of the medical record showed Resident 12 had been discharged to a lesser care setting on 03/03/2026. There was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment was maintained for 3 of 11 resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) reviewed for environment. This failure placed residents at risk for potential injury, diminished quality of life, and a lack of security within their environment. Findings included.room [ROOM NUMBER]An observation on 04/20/2026 at 10:20 AM showed: Bed Area (Window Side): Multiple wall gouges (deep grooves) to the left of the head of the bed measured at 12 inches (in-a unit of measure), 6 in, and 4 in. The wall behind the bed showed multiple deep scratches with exposed drywall and chipped paint. Sink Cabinet: Missing laminate with wood showing on the bottom left drawer (5 in by 1 in) and the bottom right drawer (2 in by 1 in). Wall (Adjacent to Bathroom Door): Multiple scratches with exposed drywall and missing paint in an area of 5 in by 1 in and an area of 1 in by1 in. Bathroom Door Trim: Multiple scratches with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-04-24 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary psychotropic (drugs that change brain chemistry to alter a person's mood, thoughts, behavior, or perceptions) medications by failing to provide a clinically valid and accurate diagnosis to justify medication use for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 1, 3, and 6 ) Reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at an increased risk for falls, medication-related adverse side effects, and unmet care needs. Findings included. Review of the policy titled, Monitoring of Psychotropic Medications, dated 04/04/2025, showed, psychotropic medications will only be given to treat a specific diagnosis and documented conditions. Resident 1 Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety disorder (a group of mental health conditions characterized by persistent, excessive, and uncontrollable fear or worry that interferes with daily life, unlike…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative nursing services programs were implemented for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 12), reviewed for restorative nursing and limited range of motion [(ROM) the extent the joint can move within the expected (normal) range of values]. This failure placed the residents at risk for loss of ROM, deconditioning, pain, and worsening contractures (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and surrounding tissues that causes the joints to shorten and stiffen). Findings included . Resident 12Review of the medical record showed the resident admitted with diagnoses including stroke. (when blood supply to part of your brain is suddenly cut off) and contractures. The 03/18/2026 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 12's cognition was moderately impaired and required the assistance of one to two staff members with activities of daily living and had impairment to both their upper and lower extremities. The assessment further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-24 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was a trauma survivor received culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice by not identifying triggers (a stimulus that causes a reaction, often an emotional or physical response) regarding a resident history of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a mental health condition triggered by experiencing or witnessing a terrifying, life-threatening or traumatic event) for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for trauma-informed care . This failure placed the resident at risk for unidentified triggers and re-traumatization. Findings included.Review of the resident's medical record showed they were admitted to the facility with diagnoses including PTSD. The 02/04/2026 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 2 required the assistance of one staff member for activities of daily living and had intact cognition. During an interview on 04/21/2026 at 8:38 AM, Resident 2 stated they were a survivor of sexual assault. The resident stated that certain men made…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely investigate and report, as required, an allegation of neglect for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This deficient practice disallowed the facility from identifying the extent of the allegation and placed residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing abuse/neglect.Findings included.Review of the Washington State Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) Nursing Home Guidelines 'The Purple Book', dated October 2015, showed Appendix H, titled Responsibility Table, listed nursing home responsibilities included reporting all suspected incidents of abuse, neglect, financial exploitation, or misappropriated property immediately or as soon as resident is protected to the State Hotline.Review of the facility policy, titled Guidelines for Staff Reporting Resident Abuse or Neglect-Long Term Care, Assisted Living and Hospital, revised 02/19/2024, showed the facility would follow the guidelines in The Purple Book regarding investigating, determining, and reporting incidents of resident abuse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee that met at least quarterly and included the Infection Preventionist who was a required member of the QAA committee. This failure minimized the effectiveness of the interdisciplinary QAA team ' s ability to identify processes and outcomes related to infection control practices and disease management. Findings included . Record review of the QAA quarterly committee team minutes dated 05/01/2024 to 03/06/2025 showed no input from the Infection Preventionist related to infection prevention and control data. Additional review of the minutes showed the third quarter QAA committee meeting was missed, and the data was included in the fourth quarter meeting (three months late). During an interview on 03/13/2025 at 10:17 AM, Staff Q, Infection Preventionist (IP), stated they had never participated or prepared a report for the QAA committee on infection control data and stated, I was not aware that I was required to be at the QAA committee or present any data. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a sanitary environment by not providing scheduled maintenance services for cleaning for 1 of 1 kitchen. This failed practice placed the residents at risk for cross contamination, food borne illness, and negative health outcomes. Findings included . During an observation on 03/10/2025 at 11:24 AM, the air vent in the kitchen located on the overhead in the middle ceiling over the food preparation areas had fuzzy brown substances that were unclean around the air filter vent grills. The air vent ' s grill, located on the ceiling over the cook's area, had multiple areas of a dark brown fuzzy substances. The air vents grill, over the first entry door to the kitchen and towards the dry goods storage area had accumulated brown fuzzy dust. The ceiling air vent ' s grill, located inside of the second entryway had brown fuzzy substances. Additionally, the overhead light fixture and plastic covering located over the cook's area and food serve out area was dirty with yellow brown substances. During an interview on 03/10/2025 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to obtain informed consent regarding the potential risks and benefits associated with the use of a psychotropic medication (medications that affects behavior and alter mental thought processes) for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 2, 7, and 11) reviewed for psychotropic medications. This failure placed residents and/or the legal representative at risk of not being fully informed about the medication prior to administration or discontinuation. Findings included . <Resident 2> Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of anxiety, depression, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD-symptoms lasting for an extended time over a traumatic event). The 02/06/2025 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 2 was alert and oriented, made their needs known, had signs/symptoms of depression (sad affect) and anxiety (feelings of negative outcomes of events), was on an antidepressant (a type of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to comprehensively assess and identify side rails attached to resident beds as a physical restraint for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 8 and 7) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed the residents at risk for injury and poor quality of life. Findings included . Record review of a facility policy titled, Long-Term Care Residents Physical Restraints, revised 12/31/2024 showed, . Physical restraints are identified as .side rails that keep the resident from voluntarily getting out of bed. Procedure: A. A Safety Device Assessment will be completed by the licensed staff for the need of the restraint related to a medical symptom. B. The resident's consent will be obtained .and documented on the assessment form. C. A physician's order will be obtained prior to the use of the restraint. D. Family will be consulted by nursing or social services in the event the resident is unable to give consent. E. Multidisciplinary care planning [NAME] be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of the discharge of 1 of 1 resident (Resident 5) reviewed for transfer/discharge notifications. This failure placed the residents at risk for decreased protection from being inappropriately discharged and lack of access to an advocacy group whom could inform them of their rights and options. Findings included . <Resident 5> Review of the resident's medical record showed they were admitted with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (the heart is unable to keep up with the demands of the body), and history of a cerebral vascular accident (also known as a stroke when oxygen is cut-off from a part of the brain). Review of the comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance with their activities of daily living (basic skills required to care for oneself). Review of Resident 5's progress notes showed the resident was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a system was in place to provide a written notice of a bed-hold at the time of discharge to the hospital prior to a hospital transfer for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 5) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the resident at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed on the long-term care unit while in the hospital. Findings included . <Resident 5> Review of the resident's medical record showed they were admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure (the heart is unable to keep up with the demands of the body), history of a cerebral vascular accident (when oxygen is cut-off from a part of the brain) and chronic urinary retention. Review of the comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident was cognitively intact and required substantial assistance with their activities of daily living (basic skills required to care for oneself). Review of Resident 5's progress notes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement an effective and individualized Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPC) for long-term care (LTC) residents that met the Center for Medicaid and Medicare Services federal regulatory requirements included monthly surveillance, monitoring/tracking of infectious diseases. This failure disallowed the designated Infection Preventionist (IP) the ability to identify trends and implement interventions. The failure placed residents at risk for infectious diseases and deterioration in their health status. Findings included . Record review of the October 2024 through March 2025 infection control process and reports which included all infections the hospital showed the LTC unit infectious diseases had not been tracked or reviewed for trends and infection rates. During an interview on 03/13/2025 at 10:11 AM, Staff Q, IP, stated they were the IP for the long-term care unit and the hospital. Staff Q stated they did not identify infection trends or rates specific to the LTC unit and had no surveillance reports or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-14 · tag F0882 — isolated
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Preventionist (IP) responsible for the facility's Infection Control Program met the education qualifications for certification prior to accepting the role as the IP in a long-term care facility. This failure placed residents at risk for not having an adequate oversight of infection control issues specific to long-term care. Findings included . During an interview on 03/13/2025 at 10:17 AM, Staff Q, IP, stated they had been hired as the IP for the hospital and the long-term care unit. Staff Q stated they had not completed the required infection control training for certification as an IP. No one told me I needed to be certified so I have not taken any of the trainings for long-term care. During an interview on 03/13/2025 at 2:36 PM, Staff B, Resident Manager, stated they were not aware that there were specific training requirements for the IP to be certified and stated they understood why it was important for the IP to have the training. Reference: WAC-388-97-1320(1)(a)

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-02-02 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to perform an annual review of the Facility Assessment (FA, an evaluation that determine what resources are required to meet each resident's care/service needs with the facility's resident population) and did not include a representative of the governing body or medical director in the development of the FA. Additionally, the FA failed to address the staffing competencies necessary to provide the level and types of care needed for the resident population. These failures placed all residents at risk of unidentified and/or unmet care and service needs. Findings included . Review of the 02/03/2023 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) State Operations Manual - Appendix PP, showed, CFR 483.70(e) Facility assessment. The facility must conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for its residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. The facility must review and update the assessment, as necessary, and at least annually . Additionally, The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to; 1) maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee that included the medical director, or their designee, to participate in the committee's effort for 3 of 3 quarterly (Q, every three months) meetings (Q1, Q2, Q3 2023) reviewed for the QAA process, and 2) ensure that a thorough analysis of the high risk/adverse events were acted upon, and, a good faith attempt was made (once the facility had become aware of the adverse event) to correct quality deficiency and care concerns identified by the facility's infection control committee (which information was submitted to the facility's QAPI committee) for 2 of 3 quarterly meetings (Q2 and Q3 2023), reviewed for QAPI and infection control concerns identified on survey. This failure placed all residents at risk for unidentified complications and prompt corrective action in resident care/services areas. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Performance Improvement Plan, dated 08/09/2022, showed that the administrator, a representative of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control interventions intended to mitigate the risk of exposure and transmission of COVID-19 (an infectious disease-causing respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, new or worsening malaise, headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, and in severe cases, difficulty breathing, that could result in severe impairment or death) were consistently implemented during a COVID-19 outbreak [two or more facility-acquired cases with epi-linkage (an overlap on the same unit or other patient location, or having the potential to have been cared for by common healthcare professionals (HCP) within a seven day time period of each other)]. The facility failed to implement infection control interventions for: • personal protective equipment (PPE - protective clothing, goggles, or other garments or equipment designed to protect the wearer's body from injury or infection) use for 8 of 9 staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered comprehensive care plan that addressed the resident's medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs for 5 of 7 residents (Resident 3, 2, 112, 6, and 7) reviewed for urinary catheter (a flexible tube used to empty the bladder and collect urine in a drainage bag) use, medication use, and transfers. These failures placed the residents at risk for not receiving care and services to meet their individualized needs. Findings included . <Urinary Catheter Use> <Resident 3> Review of the medical record showed Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a stroke with right sided weakness, atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rate that causes poor blood flow), obstructive uropathy (a disorder of the urinary tract that occurs due to obstruction in urinary flow), neurogenic bladder (a number of urinary conditions in people who lack bladder control due to a brain, spinal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-02 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the appropriate competencies (a series of knowledge, abilities, skills, experiences and behaviors, which leads to effective performance of staff regarding resident cares), and skill sets, which included an assessment of the staff's demonstration of competency in the skills needed to provide care and services for the facility's resident population, for 5 of 5 nursing staff (Staff I, K, O, P and Q) reviewed for staff competencies. This failure placed residents at an increased risk of adverse effects regarding the quality of care provided to the residents and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility's document titled, Facility Assessment Tool, dated 01/17/2021, showed the Facility Assessment [(FA) a tool used to determine the resources necessary to care for residents during both day-to-day operations and emergencies] had not been completed for the 2023 to 2024 year. Additionally, the document showed the type of care the resident population would require included, .indwelling or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were given the opportunity to formulate an Advanced Directive (AD) and/or periodically reviewed/notified residents of their right to formulate an AD for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for ADs. This failure denied residents the right to make an informed decision regarding formulation of an AD and placed residents at risk for losing the right to have their preferences and choices honored regarding emergent/end-of-life care. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Advance Directives, dated 02/06/2020, showed upon admission, and periodically thereafter, residents would be informed of their right to make health care decisions and advance directives. Additionally, if a resident wished to formulate an AD, then social services would assist in the process. <Resident 2> Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure, and a lung infection. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop an abuse prohibition policy and procedures regarding the incorporation of Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement program (QAPI). This failure disallowed the QAPI committee determination regarding abuse investigations. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled Protection of Residents from Mistreatment, Neglect, and/or Misappropriation of Property, revised 03/03/2020, showed the facility did not develop written policies/procedures related to coordination with QAPI. During an interview on 02/02/2024 at 12:50 PM, Staff A, Administrator, stated QAPI should be included in the Abuse policies. Reference: WAC 388-97-0640

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report alleged violations related to abuse to include injuries of unknown source within the required time frame to the State Agency (SA) for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 10), reviewed for abuse and neglect. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified abuse and neglect and the continued exposure to abuse and neglect. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Guidelines for Staff Reporting Resident Abuse or Neglect-Long Term care, revised on 4/28/2022, showed all employees are considered mandated reporters. According to the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, dated October 2015 (sixth edition), a nursing home employee (or other mandated reporter) is required to make a report immediately where there is a reasonable cause to believe abuse, neglect, abandonment, mistreatment, personal and/or financial exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property has occurred. Substantial injuries of unknown source must be reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation regarding allegations of abuse and/or neglect for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 10) reviewed for investigations. The failure to complete a thorough investigation placed residents at risk for abuse, neglect, and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Guidelines for Staff Reporting Resident Abuse or Neglect-Long Term care, revised on 04/28/2022, showed the facility will follow the Purple Book for investigating reported incidents of resident abuse, neglect, injuries of unknown source. According to the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, dated October 2015 (sixth edition), all incidents of abuse, neglect, abandonment, mistreatment, injuries of unknown source, personal and/or financial exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property must be thoroughly investigated. A thorough investigation is a systematic collection of review of evidence/information that describes and explains…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (Resident 3), reviewed for care and use of a urinary catheter (a hollow, partially flexible tube that collects urine from the bladder and leads to a drainage bag) received appropriate care and services by positioning the catheter drainage bag below the level of the bladder to prevent infection. This failure placed the resident at risk for additional urinary tract infections (UTI) and serious medical complications. Findings included . Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidelines titled, Prevention of Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections 2009, dated 06/06/2019, showed the Proper Techniques for Urinary Catheter Maintenance, included the catheter drainage bag must be kept below the level of the bladder. <Resident 3> Review of the medical record showed Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a stroke with right sided weakness, obstructive uropathy (a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-02 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were trauma survivors received culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 2 and 9) reviewed for trauma informed care. The facility failed to assess, monitor, and care plan residents' experiences and preferences regarding potential triggers (a stimulus that could prompt a recall of a previous traumatic event even if the stimulus itself is not traumatic or frightening) that may cause re-traumatization (a reliving of the traumatic experience). This failure placed the resident at risk for unidentified triggers and re-traumatization. Findings included . <Resident 2> Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure with a lung infection, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a disorder that develops when a person has experienced or witnessed a scary, shocking, terrifying, or dangerous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently offer substantial nutritional snacks in the evening for 6 of 9 residents (Residents 112, 8, 9, 3, 6, and 7) reviewed for evening snacks. This failure placed the residents at risk for hunger and unmet nutritional needs. Findings included . Review of an undated, facility provided document titled, Service Cart Delivery Times, showed the dinner meal for Dining Room B was scheduled for 5:00 PM and the breakfast meal was scheduled for 8:00 AM (15 hours between the evening and breakfast meal). <Resident 112> Review of the medical record showed Resident 112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbances (a disease that effects a person's personality and habits that may lead to changes in their behavior including agitation and anxiety) and adult failure to thrive (a syndrome weight loss, decreased appetite and poor nutrition, accompanied by dehydration and depressive symptoms). The 01/26/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the proper disposal of trash for 1 of 1 dumpster (Dumpster 1) reviewed for outdoor refuse storage. The failure to ensure Dumpster 1 was covered, placed the facility at risk of attracting bugs, rodents, and an unsanitary environment. Findings included . A concurrent observation and interview on 01/31/2024 at 10:19 AM with Staff F, Dietary Manager (DM), showed a tan dumpster with a wire mesh cover that was operated by a hand crank. The mesh cover was in the open position with bags of trash visible above the top of the dumpster. Staff F stated the cage top was always open so staff could put trash into the dumpster. An observation on 02/01/2024 at 7:37 AM, showed the same tan dumpster with the mesh cover in the open position. There were trash bags visible above the top of the dumpster and a cardboard box on the ground in the back corner of the dumpster enclosure. During an interview on 02/02/2024 at 9:50 AM, Staff F stated they reviewed the regulation and were not aware that the facility was responsible for the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a Performance Improvement Project (PIP) that focused on a high risk or problem prone areas of the resident population annually for 3 of 3 quarterly (Q, every three months) meetings (Q1, Q2 and Q3) reviewed for the Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) process. This failure placed residents at risk regarding quality care improvement, unidentified complications, and prompt corrective action towards high-risk/problem prone areas. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Performance Improvement Plan, dated 08/09/2022, showed that a PIP's focused on .areas of high risk, high volume or prone components of care ., and that the Administrator was to manage the QAPI program. Review of the facility's 2023 QAPI meeting minutes (Q1, Q2, Q3), showed that a PIP was not implemented in any of the quarters reviewed. During an interview on 02/02/2024 at 12:32 PM, Staff A, Administrator, stated they monitored, analyzed, and evaluated high-risk problem prone resident care areas, but don't remember the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer and/or provide an influenza (a common viral infection that attacks the lungs, nose, and throat) immunization (a vaccine that protects against infection by influenza viruses) for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 1 and 3) reviewed for immunizations. This failure placed the residents at risk for illness and transmission of a communicable disease. Findings included . Review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance titled, Influenza (flu); Flu Season, dated 09/20/2022, showed flu season usually occurs in the fall and winter. While influenza viruses spread year-round, most of the time flu activity peaks between December and February. Review of the undated Washington State Department of Health guidance titled, What's new for flu for 2023 - 2024 advised obtaining an influenza vaccination before October, although the vaccine was available through the winter months. Review of the facility provided policy titled, Flu and Pneumonia…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2026-04-24 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nursing staff posting was posted daily and/or reflected the actual nursing staff hours worked during 3 of 5 days (04/20/2026, 04/21/2026, and 04/22/2026) of the survey period. This failed practice prevented residents, family members and visitors from knowing the facility's actual number of available nursing staff. Findings included . During an observation on 04/20/2026 at 10:30 AM, and 04/21/2026 at 1:36 PM there were no nursing staff postings within the facility available to view for the residents/ resident representatives, or for visitors to view the actual staff available to provide resident care. During an observation on 04/22/2026 at 9:26 AM, the facility had no nursing staff posting viewable for residents or the public to show the actual staffing availability for resident care. During an interview on 04/22/2026 at 2:42 PM, Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse, (LPN), stated their white board was not used for the nursing staff postings. Staff F stated they were told by Director of Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 50A181. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-24, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next