No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bethany At Pacific

916 Pacific Avenue 3rd-5th Floors, Everett, WA 98201 · Non profit - Other · 80 certified beds · (425) 259-5508 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (425) 259-5508 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0609, F0610) — most recent Apr 2025Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 actual-harm citation$42,477 in federal fines
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (57) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $42,477 in federal fines (most recent 2024-04-17)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
2205 Broadway · (888) 227-3312 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens<0.1 mi
2205 Broadway · (425) 252-5213 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1825 Broadway Ave · (425) 374-7550 · Call to confirm hours
Park
2400 Lombard Ave · (425) 257-8300 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
2324 Lombard Ave · (425) 244-6671

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.7%14.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.0%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms82.1%17.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.9%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened16.0%17.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication5.3%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine91.5%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.6%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control15.7%22.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table6.9%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.2%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.6%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.0%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.6%13.4%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 212 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

62.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
73.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.66U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.24hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.35hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 73.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 103 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.66 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 44% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF62.0%CMS range 56.7–67.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.2%CMS range 7.7–13.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge73.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge68.9%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.2%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge98.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.4%CMS range 3.1–8.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.841.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.12
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.84
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.80
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.74
RN hoursweekends
36.6%
Total nursing turnover
34.8%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 74.0 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.80 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.12 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.84 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.08 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.28 to 0.74 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

14
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-18)
17
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

57 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-06-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess dietary preferences, maintain accurate documentation of nutritional intake of meals and supplements, consistently offer substitutes or replacement meals when residents ate less than 50% of a meal, notify the physician of significant weight loss, perform consistent and accurate weights, assess and offer culturally appropriate meals, and follow and update care plans as needed, for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 46) reviewed for nutrition/weight loss. Resident 46 experienced severe weight loss of 11.8% weight loss in 34 days. This failed practice placed residents at nutritional risk and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the State Operations Manual, Appendix PP - Guidance to Surveyors for Long Term Care Facilities, dated 02/03/2023, defined severe weight loss greater than five percent in one month, and greater than 7.5% in three months. Review of the facility policy titled, Weight Monitoring, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain essential equipment in safe operating condition. The facility failed to adequately identify fluctuating dishwasher rinse temperatures and ensure maintenance/repairs were successful for one of one facility high temperature dishwasher. They failed to ensure Hoyer lifts (mechanical device that assists with transfer of residents from one surface to another) and sit to stand lifts (mobility device used to help residents who are partially weight bearing from sitting position to a standing position) for one of three halls (3 South) batteries were consistently monitored and repaired for safe operation. These failures placed residents at risk for food borne illness, accidents, and overall decreased quality of life. Findings included . <DISHWASHER> On 5/12/2026 at 10:13 AM, observed the rinse cycle on the high temperature dishwasher and the temperature gauge when running the rinse cycle. The rinse cycle temperature read 178 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The gauge on the dishwasher showed the temperature should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-18 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a follow up response to concerns voiced by 1 of 1 resident groups (Resident Council). The failure to respond to the Resident Council about their concerns left the issues unresolved and resulted in the Resident Council process being ineffective at improving resident quality of life. Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Council Meetings, revised date 01/2026, documented the facility shall act upon concerns of the Council and communicate the decision to the Council. Review of the facility policy titled, Resident and Family Grievances, revised date [DATE], documented that grievances could be voiced via verbal complaints during resident council meetings. The policy documented the staff member receiving the grievance would record the nature and specifics of the grievance on the designated form and take any immediate actions needed. The policy showed all staff should make prompt efforts to resolve the grievance. In a group…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-18 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide instructions upon discharge, evaluate the need for home health support or equipment needs, and make arrangements for home medications to ensure a safe discharge for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 88) reviewed for discharge to the community and failed to provide appropriate notifications in writing to the resident/representative and the ombudsman (neutral resident advocate) for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 9, 11, and 88) reviewed for discharge process. These failures placed residents at risk of an unsafe discharge, risk of medical complications, and risk of not being informed of their rights regarding the transfer/discharge process.Findings included.<RESIDENT 88>Review of a progress note, dated 03/26/2026, showed Resident 88 discharged home Against Medical Advice (AMA). The note did not document any instructions that were provided or document any services or equipment needs for Resident 88. Review of Resident 88's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) showed no record of a discharge summary, discharge instructions or Notice of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medications were discarded in one of two medication room refrigerators and sharps containers emptied after reaching the full line, temperatures were documented and monitored for vaccines located in one of two medication room vaccine refrigerators, and failed ensure medications were secured and not accessible to the public or residents for one of one residents (Resident 93) whose medications were at their bedside. These failures place all residents at risk for receiving compromised and/or ineffective medications and medical solutions, which potentially result to the residents not receiving the therapeutic effect of the medications, and or possibly experience adverse side effects.Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medication Requiring Refrigeration, reviewed documented the facility would assure proper and safe to prevent storage of medications requiring refrigeration and the potential…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to allow residents to make choices about daily routines for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 12) reviewed for choices. The facility's failure to accommodate resident choices placed residents at risk for a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the admission minimum data set assessment (MDS-an assessment of care needs), dated 12/30/2025, the resident was cognitively intact.<FOOD>In an interview on 05/12/2026 at 10:46 AM, Resident 12 reported experiencing weight loss because the facility repeatedly provided food items they disliked. The resident stated they disliked pineapple but the facility provided pineapple in the fruit cup. The resident further stated they did not like chicken but almost every meal contained chicken. Resident 12 stated the facility should have been aware of these preferences. In an interview on 05/13/2026 at 3:04 PM, Staff I, Nursing Assistant Certified…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that 1out of 5 residents (Resident 84) reviewed for Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a federally required screening of all individuals for Intellectual Disability or Related Condition and a Serious Mental Illness prior to admission) process. The facility failed to incorporate PASRR Level II recommendations into the comprehensive care plan and failed to implement individualized activities to meet the resident's specialized behavioral health needs. This failure placed the resident at risk for psychological decline, unmet psychosocial needs, and lack of specialized services. Findings included. Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Assessment -Coordination with PASARR (PASRR) Program, revised date 04/2025, documented any recommendations included specialized services, from a PASARR level II determination and/or PASARR evaluation report would be incorporated into the resident's assessment, care planning, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the State PASRR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review-an assessment used to identify residents with Serious Mental Illness [SMI] or intellectual disabilities (ID) were not inappropriately placed in a nursing facility for long term care) Coordinator after a significant change in behavior status for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 40) reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet mental health services necessary to obtain the resident's highest level of psychosocial well-being and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Resident 40 was initially admitted on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on [DATE].Review of Resident 40's Level 1 PASRR, dated 11/11/2024, showed no indicators of SMI or ID.Review of Resident 40's diagnosis list showed dementia with psychotic disturbance (decline in mental ability that often includes visual hallucinations or paranoid beliefs) was added on 08/13/2025.Review of Resident 40's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oral hygiene was performed for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 41) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). This failure placed the resident at risk for poor oral hygiene, dental complications, decreased self-esteem, and diminished quality of life.Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), reviewed 3/2026 documented, the facility would ensure residents would receive the care and services to include oral care based on their choices and comprehensive care plan. A resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living would receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene.Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include stroke with an affected right side and removal of brain tumor.Review of Resident 41's care plan dated 04/10/2026 documented they were totally dependent on staff for oral care.Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure quality of care were met for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 12) reviewed for vision, and 1 of 5 residents (Resident 84) reviewed for unnecessary medication review. The facility failed to place essential items including the call light and television remote control within the resident's unaffected vision field; failed to ensure physician-ordered parameters were followed for blood pressure medication administration. These failures placed the residents at risk for medication errors, unmet needs, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 12>Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to included right side hemiplegia (paralysis of one side) and hemiparesis (weakness of one side) following cerebral infarction (stroke). According to the admission minimum data set assessment (MDS-an assessment of care needs), dated 12/30/2025, the resident was cognitively intact.In an interview and observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a call light (a device to request help as needed) within reach for one of one resident (Resident 20) reviewed for call light accessibility and failed to ensure one of two residents (Resident 41) were comprehensively assessed and interventions implemented to prevent an avoidable fall with injury. These failures placed residents at risk for accidents, avoidable falls, and diminished quality of life.Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Call Lights: Accessibility and Timely Response revised 3/2026 documented their policy included the call system would be accessible to residents while in their bed or other sleeping accommodations within the resident's room.Review of the facility policy titled, Fall Risk Assessment revised 3/2026 documented it was the facility's policy to provide an environment free from accident hazards over which the facility has control, and provides supervision and assistive devices to each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 46 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 44) reviewed for use and care of a catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine), received appropriate care and services, to minimize the risk of associated urinary tract infections. This failure placed residents at risk for discomfort, loss of dignity, continued urinary tract infections and other health complications.Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Catheter Care, reviewed 03/2026 documented the facility would ensure residents with indwelling catheters received appropriate catheter care. Resident 44 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include acute prostatitis (severe bacterial infection in the prostate gland) and urine retention (inability to completely empty the bladder).Review of Resident 44's care plan, dated 04/29/2026, documented they had a catheter related to urinary retention with the goal for them not to have any catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (Resident 55) reviewed for respiratory care received their physician ordered Continuous Positive Airway Pressure machine (CPAP -a machine that sends a steady flow of pressurized air into the nose and mouth to keep the airways open and helps you breath normally while sleeping). This failed practice placed the residents at risk of respiratory distress, lack of restful sleep and diminished quality of life.Findings included. According to facility policy titled Noninvasive Ventilation (CPAP, BiPAP, AVAPS, Trilogy) with revised date of 07/2025 documented, document use of the machine, resident's tolerance, any skin, respiratory or other changes and response(s).Resident 55 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include obstructive sleep apnea (disruption of breathing during sleep due to airway blockages).Review of Resident 55's physician orders documented CPAP to be on at bedtime and off in the morning, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-18 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide medically related social services and to advocate for 1 of 4 cognitively impaired residents (Resident 81) reviewed for advanced directives. The facility failed to advocate and educate the resident of legal options for an advanced directive and failed to identify other family that may be an alternative decision maker per state law which placed the resident at risk of not having their rights and wishes honored.Findings included.Resident 81 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include fall with wedge compression fracture (spinal break where the front part the vertebrae collapse while the back remains intact) of the upper/middle back.Review of Resident 81's care plan dated 05/08/2026 documented they were primary language was Mandarin.Review of Resident 81's admission documents dated 05/01/2026, to include advanced directive options/information, showed they were all signed by their Collateral Contact 4 (CC 4) as Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-18 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure speech therapy services were provided for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 91) reviewed for specialized rehabilitative services. This failure prevented residents from attaining and maintaining their highest practicable level of physical, functional and psycho-social well-being.Findings included.Resident 91 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include stroke. According to the admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 05/14/2026, the resident had intact cognition.In an interview on 05/12/2026 at 9:52 AM, Resident 91 stated they had not seen a speech therapist since they were admitted to the facility. According to the resident, they had to wait for the speech therapist to evaluate them first before they could upgrade the diet texture of their meals.Review of Resident 91's orders documented Speech Therapy evaluation and treatment for swallow and cognitive evaluation, order date 05/07/2026.Review of Resident 91's therapy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to coordinate Home Health (HH) services, provide a medication list, and complete discharge instructions for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for discharges. Failure to arrange HH services and provide a medication list placed residents at risk of unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of a facility policy titled DISCHARGE OF A RESIDENT, last reviewed on January 25th, 2025, showed: Discharge to lesser level of care (home/ALF/AFH) 3. Nurse manager and social services will complete Discharge Instruction Form in PCC to include: any follow up appointments, pharmacy to pick up prescriptions, DME ordered, HH services ordered, any special instructions for the patient after discharge and a summary of their stay. Additionally, a complete list of their medications will be provided. -On the day of the patient's discharge: a. Discharge Instruction Form and completed medication list will be reviewed by a licensed nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-21 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — pattern
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure medically related social services were provided for 8 of 8 residents (Residents 20, 28, 39, 277, 278, 324, 325, and 329) reviewed for social services. The facility failed to ensure residents received support with care planning process (Residents 28, 39, 325, and 329), failed to ensure residents were provided support to formulate their advanced directive options (Residents 325, and 329), failed to ensure residents received support with discharge planning (Residents 277, and 278), and failed to ensure referrals and recommendations for appropriate mental health services were completed (Residents 20 and 324). This failure placed residents at risk of unmet social service needs, unsafe care, psychosocial decline, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 20> Resident 20 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression, and insomnia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were offered the opportunity to participate in care conferences (a collaborative care plan meeting where a resident's care is discussed and coordinated by a team of health care providers, family members and residents) for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 325 and 329) reviewed for participation in care planning. This failure placed residents at risk of not being allowed to be involved and informed about care and services and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Care Planning-Resident Participation, revised date January 2025, documented the facility will encourage and assist the resident and/or resident representative to participate in choosing care and treatment options including initial decisions about treatment .The facility will honor the resident's right to participate in establishing the expected goals and outcome of care, the type, amount,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an advance directive (a written instruction, such as a living will or Durable Power of Attorney [DPOA] for health care [a document delegating to an agent the authority to make health care decisions in case the individual delegating the authority subsequently becomes incapable to do so]) was obtained and completed for 3 of 24 residents (Residents 325, 329 and 55), reviewed for advance directives. This failure placed the residents and/or their representatives at risk for losing their right to have their preferences honored to receive or refuse/discontinue care according to their choice. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Advance Directive Policy and Procedure, dated 2017, showed the Social Services, at the time of admission, will ask if there are any current Advance Directives. If so, copies will be obtained and placed in the resident's chart under the admission tab and scanned into PC documents. <RESIDENT 325> Resident 325…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were informed in writing of their potential liability for payment related to Medicare services ending for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 45) reviewed for Skilled Nursing Facility Advance Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN). This failure placed the residents at risk of not having adequate information to make care and financial decisions during their continued stay. Findings included . Resident 45 was admitted to the facility and was receiving skilled services under their Medicare Part A benefit. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment (a required assessment tool) dated 03/09/2025 (end of Med A stay) showed the resident had mild cognitive impairment. The resident record showed they had an Advance Directive in place designating Collateral Contact 5 (CC5) as their representative. Review of Resident 45's record documented a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) was communicated by phone to CC5 on 03/07/2025, which informed the resident and the representative that skilled nursing services would end…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a system in place that ensured grievances were addressed and resolved in response to residents' verbal conveyance of concerns for 2 of 3 resident council's (February and March 2025), who verbalized complaints during a Resident Council (RC) meeting and failed to follow the grievance process for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 12 and 35) who voiced grievances. These failures led to residents repeatedly reporting the same care issues without resolution and placed them at risk of feeling frustrated, unimportant, with diminished self-worth and decreased quality of life. Findings Included . Review of the facility policy titled Resident and Family Grievances dated October 2024 showed the social services director was designated as the Grievance Official and was responsible for overseeing the grievance process. The grievance procedure showed staff members who received the grievance would record the nature and specifics of the grievance on the designated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that potential restraints were appropriately assessed for safety, consented, and care planned for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 28) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified risks and care needs, and for a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Restraint Free Environment, reviewed 04/2025 a physical restraint refers to any manual methods of physical or mechanical device, mater, or equipment attach or adjacent to the the residents body that the individual cannot remove which restricts freedom of movement .facility was responsible for the appropriateness of the physical restraint . medical symptoms warranting the use of restraints should be documented in the medical record . care plan updated accordingly to include development and implementation of interventions. Resident 28 admitted to the facility on [DATE], they have diagnoses that include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to identify and report an allegation of abuse and/or neglect for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 28, 54, and 276) when reviewed for abuse/neglect. This failure placed the residents at risk of further abuse, psychological distress, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, reviewed 05/01/2024 stated will develop and implement policies and procedures that prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident's property staff will be able to identify different types of abuse an immediate investigation will be completed when there is suspicion of any type of abuse and or neglect all allegations will be reported immediately, but not later than two hours. <RESIDENT 28> Resident 28 admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnoses that include Alzheimer's, and cognitive communication deficit. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for 3 of 5 resident investigations (Resident 28, 44 and 54) reviewed for accidents and allegations of potential abuse and/or neglect. The facility failed to identify the root cause, and all contributing factors related to allegations of abuse and/or neglect placed residents at risk for injury, and additional abuse/neglect. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation, reviewed 05/01/2024, stated the facility will investigate and interview all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge of the allegations .provide complete and thorough documentation of the investigations .provide emotional support and counselling to the resident during and after the investigation. <RESIDENT 44> Resident 44 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include fracture of surgical neck of left humerus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARR-an assessment to ensure individuals with Serious Mental Illness [SMI] or Intellectual/Developmental Disabilities [ID/DD] are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) Level I was completed for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 324), reviewed for PASARR screening. This failure placed the resident at risk for not receiving the care and services appropriate for their needs. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident assessment-Coordination with PASARR program, reviewed in October 2024, showed that all applicants to this facility will be screened for serious mental disorders or intellectual disabilities and related conditions in accordance with the State's Medicaid rules for screening. PASARR level I-initial pre-screening that is completed prior to admission .The facility will only admit individuals with a mental disorder or intellectual disability who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessments were completed for residents following significant change in status or with newly evident or possible serious mental disorders for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 55) reviewed. This failure resulted in a potential delay in access to level 2 PASSR services and decreased quality of life. Findings include . PASSR - a federally required screening of all individuals who has both an intellectual disability or related condition and a serious mental illness prior to admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility or a significant change of condition. According to the facility policy titled Resident Assessment- Coordination with PASSR Program review date 10/2024 documented: Any resident who exhibits a newly evident or possible serious mental disorder will be referred promptly to the state mental health or a level II resident review. Examples include: A resident who exhibits behavioral,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards of practice were implemented for 3 or 3 residents (Residents 278, 328, and 329) reviewed for oxygen therapy. Failure to obtain a doctor's order prior to administering oxygen placed residents at risk for potential adverse outcomes. Findings include . Review of the facility policy titled Oxygen Administration, review date 10/2024 documented: Oxygen is administered under orders of a physician, change oxygen tubing and mask/cannula weekly and as needed. <RESIDENT 278> Resident 278 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with admitting diagnoses to include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD - a type of progressive lung disease). According to the admission Minimum Date Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE], the resident had moderately impaired cognition and was on oxygen therapy. In an observation on 04/15/2025 at 2:05 PM, Resident 278's oxygen tubing was on the floor under the left side of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 20) reviewed for mood and behavior. The facility failed to ensure a psychiatric evaluation was reviewed, and implementation of mental health recommendations for treatment of depression. These failures placed the residents at risk for declining their mental health and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 20 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included depression, and insomnia. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) dated 03/04/2025 showed the resident had moderately impaired cognition, with moderate depression. Review of Resident 20's care plan showed a focus area dated 03/04/2025 that the resident had a behavior problem of refusal of care related to their depression and anxiety. Interventions included administering medications as ordered and documenting effectiveness. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative therapy services (a personalized training program to help people maintain or regain their ability to do everyday tasks, like walking, dressing, and eating) were implemented to prevent avoidable reduction of range of motion (ROM, how far you can move a joint in any direction) for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 35), reviewed for restorative therapy and limited ROM. This failure placed residents at risk for loss of ROM, deconditioning, and loss of independence. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Restorative Nursing Programs dated 07/01/2024 showed the interdisciplinary team, with the support and guidance from the physician, would assure ongoing review, evaluation, and decision making regarding the services needed to maintain or improve a resident's abilities in accordance with the resident's comprehensive assessment, goals, and preferences. Resident 35 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate safety interventions were developed and implemented for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 234 and 328) who had dysphasia (difficulty swallowing) and were at risk for aspiration (inhalation of food). This failure placed residents at risk for aspiration, increased health complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings Included . Review of the facility policy titled, Refusal of Medications, and Treatment Refusal or Non-compliance with Care, dated 08/22/2011, showed: Documentation pertaining to a resident's refusal of treatment shall include each time the resident refused his or her treatment and resident's condition and any adverse effects due to such refusal. The date and time the physician was notified as well as the physician's response. All pertinent observations and the signature and title of the person recording data. Resident's legal representative must be notified of the resident's refusal. Referral must also be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 1 residents (Resident 35) who were incontinent of bladder and continent of bowel received appropriate treatment and services to restore continence to the extent possible. This failure placed residents at an increased risk of urinary tract infections, discomfort, loss of dignity, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 35 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include peripheral vascular disease (circulatory condition involving narrowing of the blood vessels), high blood pressure, and atrial fibrillation (rapid/irregular heartbeat). In an interview on 04/16/2025 at 9:54 AM Resident 35 stated they had been getting therapy and was able to use the toilet to have bowel movements, but was told the insurance would not cover anymore therapy and was moved to the third floor, at which time they were told there was no bathroom, and they would need to use their brief to urinate and defecate. In a review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents (Resident 55) reviewed for unnecessary medication were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect mental processes, emotions and behaviors). The facility failed to ensure valid diagnosis for the use of psychotropic medication, they failed to obtain consent for the antidepressant medication and failed to monitor for any adverse side effects (ASE) for the psychotropic medications. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications, for adverse side effects and diminished quality of life. Findings include . According to the FDA Boxed Warning: Elderly patients with dementia (a term used to describe a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities)-related psychosis (symptoms that happen when a person is disconnected from reality) are at an increased risk of death. Seroquel or Quetiapine Fumarate is not approved for elderly with dementia related…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a treatment cart (containing prescribed topicals, ointments, and wound cleaning agents) was secured in a locked storage area and inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents for 1 of 4 treatment carts (3 South Unit) observed for medication cart review. These failures placed residents at risk for unauthorized access to medications and treatments that should be securely stored. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, dated 01/2023, medications, and other biologicals are stored properly the supply shall be only accessible to licensed nursing personnel supplies should remain locked when not in use or unattended. In an observation on 04/18/2025 at 10:38 AM, the treatment cart on unit 3 South was observed to be unlocked, and no licensed staff around. The drawers were accessible to anyone that walked by, observed in some of the drawers was a tube of topical pain gel (that must be prescribed by a doctor), three 16 ounce bottles of Dakin's solution (a prescribed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY <HAND HYGIENE> RESIDENT 422 Resident 422 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In an observation/interview on 06/07/2024 at 7:43 AM, Staff M, Licensed Practical Nurse/Resident Care Manager, was observed performing wound care on Resident 422's left heel pressure injury and did not perform hand hygiene after removing their gloves and donning a new pair of gloves during the procedure. In an interview Staff M was unable to provide any information about their lack of hand hygiene. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were compliant with Infection Prevention and Control Guidelines and national standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 14) reviewed for transmission-based precautions (TBP) of a resident that had tested positive for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19 -an infectious disease-causing respiratory illness with symptoms including cough, fever, new or worsening malaise [a general feeling of discomfort/uneasiness], headache, dizziness, nausea, vomiting,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-06-12 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Preventionist (IP) met the qualifications for experience, education, and training or certification for the role to assume responsibility for the facility's Infection Prevention Control Program (IPCP). This failure placed residents, family members, and staff at risk for unmet infection control issues and lack of oversite of the facility staff's infection control practices. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Infection Surveillance, revised 05/29/2024, The Infection Preventionist serves as the leader in surveillance activities, maintains documentation of incidents, findings, and any corrective actions made by the facility and reports surveillance findings to the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee, and public health authorities when required. Review of the facility's Staff Key Personnel document, updated 06/05/2024, showed Staff C, Registered Nurse (RN), was designated Infection Preventionist (IP) with a date of hire as 05/06/2024. On 06/05/2024 at 9:14…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain, provide, and/or assist with completing Advance Directives for 4 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 22, 32, 62, and 65) reviewed for Advance Directives. This failure placed residents at risk for losing their right to have their healthcare preferences and/or decisions honored. Findings included . <RESIDENT 32> Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fall at home resulting in left tibia fracture, and infection at left tibia surgical site. Resident 32's profile information records showed they were self-responsible in making their own decisions. Review of Resident 32's current medical record on 06/05/2024 and 06/10/2024, showed no Advance Directives had been formulated. Review of the resident's medical record did not show documentation that the resident had been informed of their right to formulate an Advance Directive. In a joint interview on 06/07/2024 at 12:15 PM, with Staff A, Administrator, and Staff V, Unit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment for 1 of 2 floors (3rd floor). The failure to ensure resident's floors were clean and free of debris, and utility and housekeeping rooms were secured left residents at risk for a diminished quality of life, and a less than homelike environment. Findings included . <UNSECURED MAINTENANCE AND HOUSEKEEPING EQUIPMENT> In an observation on 06/05/2024 at 11:01 AM, the maintenance room door and the housekeeping room doors near room [ROOM NUMBER] were unlocked and unsecured. The maintenance room had paint, caulk, tools, various equipment, television (TV) screens and other clutter were stored all over the room and floor. The housekeeping room had chemicals to include Aromazyne drain and grease trap maintenance odor eliminator that was labeled to keep out of reach of children. In an interview on 06/05/2024 at 11:14 AM, Staff U, Maintenance Assistant, stated those rooms were supposed to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-06-12 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a federal requirement to help ensure that individuals who had a mental disorder or intellectual disabilities were offered the most appropriate setting for their needs [in the community, a nursing facility, or acute care setting]; and receive the services they need in those settings), was followed for 4 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 7, 42, 21 and 26). Failure to coordinate Resident 7, 42, 21, and 26 for Level II (an in-depth evaluation to determine whether the resident requires specialized rehabilitation services) services as indicated placed residents at risk for not receiving care and services in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs. Findings included . <RESIDENT 7> Resident 7 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety, depression, and bi-polar disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity levels,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans to meet the needs and preferences for 2 of 8 sample residents (Resident 32 and 6) reviewed for Level II PASRR (an in-depth evaluation to determine if a resident has a serious mental illness [SMI], Intellectual Disability [ID] or Related Condition [RC]and is completed by a representative from the state intellectual disability authority), 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 65) reviewed for discharge planning, 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 42) reviewed for emotion/behaviors, 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 26) reviewed for dental, and 1 of 3 sample residents (Resident 422) reviewed for accidents care plans. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving needed and preferred care and services and a decreased quality of life. Findings include . <LEVEL II PASRR> RESIDENT 32 Resident 32 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include depression and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise comprehensive care plans for 4 of 18 sampled residents (Residents 8, 21, 26 and 58), reviewed for care plan revision. The failure to revise care plans for hospice services, resident caregiver preference, edema management, and use of psychotropic medication placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 8> Resident 8 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke, anxiety disorder and high blood pressure. Review of Resident 8's electronic medical record showed they were admitted to hospice services on 03/14/2024. Observation on 06/06/2024 at 9:09 AM, an oxygen (O2) concentrator (a medical device that provides pure O2) was located next Resident 8's bedside table. There was green O2 tubing laying on the floor. Review of hospice binder, located at the nurse's station, on 06/11/2024 at 8:40 AM, showed a facility/hospice care coordination-…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist conducted thorough monthly medication regimen reviews (MRRs), identified and reported medication-related irregularities for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 18, 21 and 26) reviewed. The failure to act on irregularities identified by the consulting pharmacist placed residents at risk for medication-related adverse consequences and for receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings included . Six months of the prior pharmacy consultant reviews were requested from the facility on 06/07/2024. The facility provided consultant pharmacy reviews for December 2023, January 2024, February 2024, and May of 2024. In an interview on 06/07/24 at 1:22 PM, Staff B, Registered Nurse (RN)/Director of Nursing Services, stated they did not have March 2024 or April 2024 pharmacy reviews. Staff B stated the consultant pharmacist changed and no pharmacy reviews had been done for March or April. On 06/12/2024 at 10:00 AM, Staff B…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-06-12 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 Certified Nursing Assistants (NACs) (Staff G, H and I) reviewed for training, had the required 12 hours per year of in-services. This failure placed residents at risk of less than competent care and services from staff. Findings included . Review of Staff G, NAC's, employee file showed their date of hire was 05/19/2019. Review of the in-service education provided did not show evidence of the required 12 hours of in-service education for the prior year. Review of Staff H, NAC's, employee file showed their date of hire was 03/10/2020. Review of the in-service education provided did not show evidence of the required 12 hours of in-service education for the prior year. Review of Staff I, NAC's, employee file showed their date of hire was 12/03/2022. Review of the in-service education provided did not show evidence of the required 12 hours of in-service education for the prior year. In an interview on 06/10/2024 at 8:02 AM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services stated the education logs from their computer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident was evaluated, assessed and a physician order was obtained for safe administration of medications for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 46) reviewed for clinically appropriate self-administration of medications. This failed practice placed the resident at risk for adverse medication interactions, complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Medication Administration Self-Administration by Resident: Self-Administration by Resident, dated 11/2017, showed: Residents who desire to self-administer medications are permitted to do so with a prescriber's order and if the nursing care center's interdisciplinary team has determined that the practice would be safe, and the medications are appropriate and safe for self-administration. Resident 46 admitted on [DATE]. According to the admission Minimum Data Set Assessment (an assessment tool) dated 05/05/2024, the resident had no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete accurate assessments for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 58) reviewed for dental concerns, and 2 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 6 and 32 ), reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a federally required screening of all individuals who has both an Intellectual Disability [ID] or Related Condition [RC] and a serious mental illness [SMI] prior to admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility or a significant change of condition). These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . <DENTAL> Resident 58 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included kidney failure, urinary tract infection, and atrial fibrillation (an irregular heart rate). Review of Resident 58's Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) assessment, dated 05/02/2024, showed they did not have any missing or broken teeth, abnormal mouth tissue, obvious or likely cavities, no teeth,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a federally required screening of all individuals identified with an Intellectual Disability [ID] or Related Condition [RC] or a serious mental illness [SMI] prior to admission to a Medicaid-certified nursing facility or a significant change of condition) form was completed according to the guidelines specified for 3 of 8 sampled residents (Residents 2, 6 and 32) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Incomplete or inaccurate PASRRs placed residents at risk for inappropriate placement and/or lack of access to specialized services for residents with identified serious mental health indicators or intellectual disability. Findings included . Review of Washington State's exempted hospital requirement (42 CFR 483.106(b)(2)(ii)), showed if an individual who entered a nursing facility as an exception (an exempted hospital discharge) was later found to require more than 30 days of nursing facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 30) reviewed for Pressure Ulcers (PU) were provided care planned interventions they required for the prevention or worsening of PU. This failure to implement pressure reducing devices in accordance with physician's orders placed residents at risk for PU development, worsening of PU, pain, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 30 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke, high blood pressure, spinal stenosis (the spaces inside the backbones of the spine get too small), and right rotator cuff tear (injury to the group of muscles and tendons that hold the shoulder joint in place). In a review of Resident 30's Care Area Assessment (CAA- a systematic process to interpret the triggered information from the Minimum Data Set assessment to assess the potential problem and determine if the area should be care planned), dated 11/10/2023, showed they were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with limited range of motion (ROM) received the necessary services to maintain their level of functioning and/or prevent decline for 2 of 2 sample residents (Residents 14 and 26) reviewed for limited range of motion. This failure placed the residents at risk for decreased ROM and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Restorative Nursing Programs, dated 05/01/2024, showed the interdisciplinary team would assure the ongoing review, evaluation, and decision-making regarding the services needed to maintain or improve the residents' abilities in accordance with their comprehensive assessment, goals and preferences. The policy also indicated the restorative nursing plan would include the frequency of the restorative activities. The policy indicated the restorative nurse would provide oversight of the restorative aide activities, review the documentation at least weekly, and evaluate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-12 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to obtain needed services from an outside entity for 1 of 2 sampled resident's (Resident 26) reviewed for medically related social services. The facility failed to coordinate and schedule a dermatology appointment after a referral was made for Resident 26 which placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and decrease in their mental, physical, and psychosocial wellbeing. Findings included . Resident 26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included peripheral vascular disease (slow and progressive circulation disorder caused by narrowing, blockage or spasms in a blood vessel), depression, and cancer. In an interview on 06/05/2024 at 10:28 AM, Resident 26 stated they wanted a second opinion about the rash on his legs. Resident 26 stated the rash on their legs itched and the nurse practitioner had told them that they could not be seen by a skin specialist. In a review of Resident 26's progress note, dated 01/18/2024, showed they had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice to the resident, resident's representative(s), and representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of an emergency transfer for 3 of 5 residents' (Resident's1, 2, and 3) reviewed for hospitalizations. This failure did not afford residents and/or their representatives to make informed decisions about transfers and prohibited access to an advocate who could inform the resident/representative of their options and rights. Findings included . Review of facility policy titled, Transfer and Discharge, revised on 05/01/2024, showed It is the policy of this facility to permit each resident to remain in the facility, and not initiated transfer or discharge for the resident from the facility, except in limited circumstances. The policy showed Emergency Transfers/Discharges are initiated by the facility for medical reasons to an acute care setting such as hospital, for the immediate safety and welfare of a resident.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-16 · tag F0625 — pattern
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice in writing at the time of a resident transfer to the hospital or within 24 hours of transfer to the hospital for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) reviewed for hospitalizations. This failed practice placed residents or their representative at risk for lack of knowledge regarding the right to hold their bed while they were at the hospital. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Bed Hold Policy, dated 05/01/2024, stated the facility will provide written information to the resident and/or representative regarding bed hold policies prior to transferring a resident to the hospital or the resident goes on therapeutic leave. <RESIDENT 1> A review of Resident 1's hospital admission information showed the resident discharged from facility to the hospital on [DATE]. <RESIDENT 2> A review of Resident 2's current nursing progress notes and admission/discharge history, showed the resident discharged from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0640 — isolated
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to complete and transmit resident assessment data to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) within the required timeframes for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 1) whose Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessments were reviewed for timeliness in transmission/submission. The facility's lack of an effective system in ensuring the MDS assessments and tracking records are completed and transmitted timely as required placed all residents of the facility at risk for unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included altered mental status, dementia, anxiety, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (lung disease). Review of the MDS tracking record on 05/15/2024 at 12:45 PM, showed an Entry or Discharge MDS assessment had not been completed for Resident 1. In an interview on 05/15/2024 at 2:35 PM, Staff D, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/admission Nurse,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment in resident rooms for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 4, and 7) reviewed. The failure to have functioning lights over the sinks in resident rooms and to ensure the soap dispenser had soap placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 4> Resident 4 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In a phone interview on 04/16/2024 at 2:43 PM, Resident 4 stated the room they had stayed in at the facility was not maintained in a clean condition and there were lights in the room that did not work. <RESIDENT 7> Resident 7 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In an observation/interview on 04/17/2024 at 11:50 AM, Resident 7 stated the light over the sink was not working and they had notified staff who had not responded yet. Resident 7 stated the soap dispenser by the sink was empty and it had been like that, and they had notified staff, but they never refilled it. In an observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to resolve resident grievances for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 2) reviewed for grievances. The failure to resolve resident grievances placed residents at risk for ongoing unmet care needs, missed activities, and unresolved missing property. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Resident and Family Grievances, dated 07/01/2023, showed: -Prompt efforts to resolve include facility acknowledgement of a complaint/grievance and actively working toward resolution of that complaint/grievance. -A resident or family member may voice grievances with respect to care and treatment which has been furnished as well as that which has not been furnished . -Grievances may be voiced verbally, written, by telephone by the Ombudsman programs, and by verbal complaint of the resident. -The staff member receiving the grievance will record the nature and specifics of the grievance on the designated grievance form or assist the resident or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) reviewed. The failure to obtain necessary physician progress notes and orders, and to revise the resident's medications accordingly, and to provide necessary transfer assistance placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, adverse medication-related outcomes, missed activities, and for diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 1> Resident 1 resided in the facility from [DATE] - 02/26/2024. The resident had diagnoses to include a stroke, heart failure, pneumonia, and breathing difficulties. Review of a nursing progress note, dated 02/21/2024, showed Resident 1 had an appointment with their physician that day. On 04/17/2024 a review of Resident 1's clinical record showed there were no physician progress notes found for their 02/21/2024 doctor appointment. In an interview on 04/17/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0775 — isolated
    Keep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain and file clinical laboratory reports for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 1) reviewed for lab results. The failure to ensure resident's laboratory results were filed in the resident's clinical record placed them at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . Resident 1 resided in the facility from [DATE] - 02/26/2024. Review of Resident 1's nursing progress note, dated 02/21/2024 at 7:29 PM, showed Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Resident Care Manager, authored a note that indicated the resident had a doctor appointment that day and two lab tests were done. On 04/17/2024, Resident 1's clinical record was reviewed. There were no laboratory results filed in the resident's clinical record from their doctor appointment on 02/21/2024. In an interview on 04/17/2024 at 3:50 PM, Staff F and Staff C, LPN/Assistant Director of Nursing Services, were unable to provide any information about the lack of documentation in Resident 1's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0779 — isolated
    Keep signed and dated reports of x-rays and other diagnostic services in the residents record.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain and file a radiology report for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 1) reviewed for radiology results. The failure to ensure residents radiology results were filed in their clinical record placed them at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . Resident 1 resided in the facility from [DATE] - 02/26/2024. Review of Resident 1's nursing progress note, dated 02/21/2024 at 7:29 PM, showed Staff F, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Resident Care Manager, authored a note that indicated the resident had a doctor appointment that day and a chest X-Ray was done. A review of Resident 1's clinical record on 04/17/2024, showed no chest X-Ray report was filed in the resident's clinical record from their doctor appointment on 02/21/2024. In an interview on 04/17/2024 at 3:50 PM, Staff F and Staff C, LPN/Assistant Director of Nursing Services, were unable to provide any information about the lack of the results of the chest X-ray in the resident's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete, accurate, and accessible clinical records for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1, 2, and 4) reviewed for care and services. The failure to maintain clinical records in accordance with professional standards of practice placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 1> Resident 1 resided in the facility from [DATE] - 02/26/2024. The resident had diagnoses to include a stroke, heart failure, pneumonia, and breathing difficulties. A review of Resident 1's clinical record on 04/17/2024, showed there were no physician progress notes found for their doctor appointment on 02/21/2024. In an interview on 04/17/2024 at 2:47 PM, Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN)/Assistant Director of Nursing Services (ADNS), and Staff J, Medical Records Director, stated they did not have the progress notes from Resident 1's doctor appointment on 02/21/2024. Staff J stated they would call and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$42,477 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $42,477 — penalty dated 2024-04-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
DEGROODT, PATRICIAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/01/2023
DOBLER, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/23/2025
GAY, JEFFIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/27/2017
IHLE, LORENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/23/2025
JACOBSON, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/27/2018
KNUDSON, VERONICAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/23/2025
KOENIG, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2007
NESSE, JANICEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/23/2025
NICHOLSON, ERICIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/26/2023
ROHDE, TOMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/07/2018
SEYED ALIROTEH, MAHDIESADATIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/04/2024
STAVE, LAWRENCEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/23/2025
TIU, SUSANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/03/2019
WALLIN, TERRIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/23/2020
SCRIVENS, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/06/2019
BASADA, MARLITAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2024
BAUGUESS, TRISTINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/25/2025
MANN, HARPREETIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2022
BETHANY OF THE NORTHWESTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/22/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$776K
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 50%Medicare 10%Other / private 40%

This home reported $776K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$480per resident / day
operating cost
$14,601per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$474per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505404. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next