No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Bethany At Silver Lake

2235 Lake Heights Drive, Everett, WA 98208 · Non profit - Church related · 151 certified beds · (425) 338-3000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (425) 338-3000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 actual-harm citations$121,447 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (5/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 2 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $121,447 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-02)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 5 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1818 121st St SE · (425) 357-3304 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
11020 19th Ave SE · (425) 379-5390 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
El Nevado0.3 mi
11419 19th Ave SE · (425) 316-3573 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Mount Baker National Recreation Area · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.4%14.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.4%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.6%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms58.5%17.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.9%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.5%17.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.9%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.9%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.9%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control32.2%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.1%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.8%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.1%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit8.2%13.4%12.0%better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

47.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 188 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

47.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
46.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.56U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.37hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 46.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 91 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.56 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 86% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 60% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF47.0%CMS range 40.0–55.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.1%CMS range 6.6–12.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge46.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge47.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge48.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified82.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting95.8%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.9%CMS range 3.6–9.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.87
RN hours/ resident / day
0.92
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.74
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.53
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.53
RN hoursweekends
35.4%
Total nursing turnover
40.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 151 beds and averages 115.5 residents a day — about 76% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.87 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.74 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.76 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.01 to 0.53 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

7
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-20)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-20)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2024-05-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2), who resided on a secured Special Care Unit (SCU), were free from sexual abuse. Resident 2 experienced pyshcosocial harm in the form of emotional distress, applying the reasonable person approach, when the facility failed to prevent sexual activity between two residents with cognitive deficits who were unable to consent to sexual relations. This failure placed all residents on the unit at risk of unwanted sexual contact, injury and psychological harm. Findings included . Review of an undated facility policy, titled, Special Care Unit, showed the unit provided a safe environment for independent ambulation or wheelchair mobility for residents with poor safety judgement such as a resident who wandered into other resident's rooms. Review of a facility policy, titled, SCU Admission, Transfer, Discharge, revised date 10/11/2021, showed the unit was intended to provide a structured and secure environment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-10-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and services to prevent the occurrence of avoidable Pressure Ulcer/Pressure Injury (PU/PI) for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 32) who was admitted without a PU/PI and had multiple co-morbidities with an increased risk for PU/PI development. Resident 32 experienced harm when they developed a Stage 3 (defined as full thickness loss of tissue) PU/PI to the resident's coccyx (tailbone region). The facility did not document refusals to reposition, or recognize the need to evaluate/modify the interventions to prevent a PU/PI when Resident 32 was non-compliant with repositioning. Thes failures placed other residents at risk for developing PU/PI's, medical complications, and unmet care needs. Findings include . Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument manual, dated 2019, shows a PU defined as a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue, usually over a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-20 · tag F0825 — pattern
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure skilled rehab services were delivered in accordance with resident evaluations and treatment plans for 3 of 4 residents (8,91,119) reviewed for rehab and restorative services. This failure placed residents at risk for delay in recovery and/or discharge and decreased quality of life. Findings included .In an interview on 03/19/2026 at 10:52 AM, Staff J, Director of Rehabilitation Services, stated the new therapy company started on 03/01/2026. Staff J stated they were provided transitional evaluations from the outgoing therapy company. Staff J stated the transitional evaluations provided a baseline for them to work from and then updated goals as they began treating residents. Staff J stated residents were all set up to be seen at the maximum frequency and at least 5 times per week. <RESIDENT 119> Resident 119 admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included gait impairment and a fractured right arm which did not require surgery. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident grievances were filed and addressed for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 29) reviewed for grievances. This failure to address and resolve resident grievances placed residents at risk for diminished dignity, unresolved missing property and diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled Grievance Policy and Procedure for Residents, revision date 10/2022, documented any employee that is informed of a grievance by a resident will immediately initiate the procedures for resolution of a grievance. Upon learning of grievance, prompt action will be taken to resolve and provide timely response of concern.Resident 29 was admitted on [DATE]. According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE], the resident was cognitively intact.In an interview on 03/16/2026 at 10:02 AM, Resident 29 stated they had a Samsung tablet that's been missing for two to three months. They added that the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the Minimum Data Set, (MDS, an assessment tool that was used to develop the resident centered care plan) for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for communication and 2 of 3 residents (Resident 22 and 86) reviewed for insulin (a hormone that body secretes to regulate the amount of sugar in the blood) use. Failure to accurately complete the MDS placed residents at risk for inappropriate medical care and decreased quality of life.Findings included. <RESIDENT 2> Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the 12/26/2025 MDS, the resident's primary language was not English. On 03/16/2025 at 9:53 AM, Staff U, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), reported Resident 2 had dementia (disease affecting cognitive function and memory). Staff U reported the staff communicated with Resident 2 by family translating for resident or used staff that spoke the same language. On 03/16/2026 at 12:57 PM, during an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (Resident 11) reviewed for activities had an accurate assessment of recreational care needs and received an ongoing program of activities to meet the individual resident's physical and mental needs. Based on the reasonable person concept, not having adequate recreation and/or sensory stimulation placed the resident at risk for social isolation, lack of stimulation and diminished quality of life.Findings included .Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE], the resident had severely impaired cognition.In a telephone interview on 03/16/2026 at 1:29 PM, Resident 11's Collateral Contact 1 stated that the resident was being left on their own for many hours without any stimulation or activities.During observations on 03/18/2026 at 8:12 AM, 10:10 AM and 2:00 PM, Resident 11 was in bed with no lights on and TV was off. During…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-20 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 2 residents (Resident 24) reviewed for limited Range of Motion (ROM) received necessary care and services. The facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate services to prevent further decrease in range of motion and hand contracture (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin and nearby tissues that causes the joints to shorten and become very stiff). This failure placed residents at risk for decline in mobility and function, increased dependence on staff, and a decreased quality of life.Findings included. Review of the facility policy titled, Restorative Nursing Documentation, reviewed 01/12/2026 stated the facility maintains documentation of treatments and responses to those treatments.if an unusual event occurs during a treatment (i.e. pain, swelling, skin breakdown) document in the narrative note and report to the charge nurse.evaluation will be documented quarterly and as needed if a change to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure one of five staff reviewed, (Staff H) received timely annual performance evaluations. Failure to complete timely evaluations of nursing staff performance, conduct education and in-services based on those evaluations had the potential to result in decreased quality of resident care. Findings included .Staff H was hired 02/18/2020 and was a certified nursing assistant. Review of requested employee evaluations on 03/18/2026 showed the most recent employee evaluation provided for Staff H was dated 08/13/2024. In an interview on 03/18/2026 at 3:00 PM, Staff I, Administrative Assistant, stated there were no more recent evaluations found for Staff H. In an interview on 03/20/2026 at 09:20 AM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services, acknowledged late evaluation for Staff H and stated the expectation was that evaluations were done yearly. Refer to WAC 388-97-1680(1)(2)(a)-(c)

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-20 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Two medication errors were identified for 2 of 4 residents (Resident 97 and 39) observed during 25 medication opportunities which resulted in an error rate of 8%. Failure to provide medications on an empty stomach as ordered and failure to prime the needle prior to administration of insulin (synthetic hormone that allows sugar to enter cells and regulates the amount of sugar in the blood) placed residents at risk of decreased medication efficacy.Findings included.Review of a facility policy titled, Medication Administration, dated 06/18/2020, documented medications were to be administered 60 minutes prior to or after the scheduled time unless otherwise ordered by the physician. Review of a facility policy titled, Procedure for Insulin Pen Administration, dated 08/2018, documented the insulin flow was to be checked prior to each injection. Dial two to three units and slowly depress the button to check that a drop of insulin appeared at the end of the needle.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-20 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to provide 4 of 5 residents (Resident 28, 86, 35, 508) with a summary of their baseline care plan. This failure placed residents at risk of not being informed of their initial plan for delivery of care and services and placed them at risk for unmet needs and possible complications. Findings included . Review of a facility policy, titled, Baseline Care Plan, dated 02/05/2020, showed the base line care plan: - Be developed within 48 hours of a resident's admission, - Admitting nurse shall gather information from hospital information, physician orders and discussion with the resident, - A written summary of the baseline care plan will be provided to the resident, - The written summary will be signed by the resident and included in the medical record. <RESIDENT 28> Resident 28 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 28's baseline care plan form showed which staff had completed the base line care plan. There was a signature by Staff N, Social…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-20 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review and revise care plans for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 69) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 75) reviewed for discharge planning, 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 9) reviewed for communication, 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 18) reviewed for dementia care, 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 40) reviewed for dental services, and 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 83) reviewed for urinary management. These failures placed the residents at risk for lack of consistent interventions, unmet care needs, adverse health effects, and a diminished quality of life. Findings include . Review of the facility policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated February 2023, showed that the facility will develop and implement a comprehensive person centered care plan for all residents, consistent with resident rights, that include measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the needs,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to accommodate resident preferences for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 508, 35, and 92) regarding important daily routines and health care. The failure of the facility to honor resident choice placed residents at risk for a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 508> Resident 508 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In an interview on 12/16/2024 at 10:26 AM, Resident 508 stated they preferred not to be awakened at 6:00 AM. Resident 508 stated they had told the nurses not to come in and they did not want breakfast, but the staff kept coming in and waking them up. Review of Resident 508's choice assessment, dated 12/14/2024, showed Resident 508 preferred to get up at 8:00 AM. Review a progress note dated 12/16/2024 at 1:45 PM, showed Resident 508 was angry for being woken up in the morning, and they refused vitals (blood pressure and heart rate) checked, breakfast, blood sugar check (checks sugar level in blood) and weight.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly report and document resident grievances for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 35) reviewed for grievance resolution. The failure of staff to initiate resident grievances resulted in delays in grievance resolution and an extended period where a resident went without their missing property and placed residents at risk for frustration and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy, titled, Grievance Policy and Procedure for Residents, revised date of June 2022, showed any employee that is informed of a grievance by a resident will immediately initiate the procedures for resolution of a grievance. Resident 35 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) assessment, dated 12/06/2024, the resident was cognitively intact. In an interview on 12/16/2024 at 2:34 PM, Resident 35 stated they were missing a left-hand arthritis glove, and it had been missing for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-20 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (Resident 82) reviewed for blood sugar (BS) monitoring received BS checks per standards of practice/care. This failure exposed residents to an increased risk of inaccurate insulin administration and the potential for decreased blood sugar. Finding Included . A review of the facility policy, titled Timely Administration of Insulin, dated June 2020, stated that insulin administration will be coordinated with mealtimes and snacks. Resident 82 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include diabetes type 2 (a chronic disease that occurs when the sugar level in the blood stream was too high.) In an observation and interview on 12/19/2024 at 12:56 PM, Staff Q, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) assessed Resident 82's BS after they had eaten their lunch. Staff Q then administered sliding-scale (an insulin prescription that adjusts the amount of insulin a person receives based on their blood sugar level) insulin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide respiratory care consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 40) reviewed for respiratory care. Failure to follow provider's orders for oxygen (O2) therapy placed the resident at risk for unmet needs, potential negative outcomes and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, undated, showed oxygen would be administered to resident's who needed it, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive care plan and the resident's goals and preferences. The explanation and guidelines outlined in the policy showed oxygen was administered under orders of a physician. Resident 40 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD-progressive lung disease that limits airflow and makes it difficult to breath). On 12/16/2024 at 1:51 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a dignified and homelike dining experience in 2 of 3 (Southeast and South) dining rooms during 3 of 3 dining observations for dignity. These failures placed residents at risk for feelings of frustration, diminished self-worth, embarrassment, and a potential decline in nutritional status. Findings included . <SOUTHEAST DINING ROOM> Observation on 10/24/2023 at 11:37 AM, Resident 101's meal tray was served. The resident's tablemates, Resident 76, and Resident 33, were observed to watch Resident 101 eat until their lunch arrived at 11:43 PM, six minutes later. The resident's food and drinks were not removed from the serving tray for the dining experience. Observation on 10/27/2023 at 11:28 AM, trays were delivered to the unit. Resident 33's meal was served at 11:30 AM, followed by their tablemates Resident 76's at 11:34 AM and Resident 1's meal at 11:35 AM. At the same table Resident 101 was staring at their tablemates eating and inquiring as to where their food was. Collateral Contact 1 (CC1), Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain, provide, and/or assist with completing Advance Directives (AD's) for 5 of 12 sampled residents (Residents 160, 32, 75, 6 and 100) reviewed for AD's. This failure placed residents at risk for losing their right to have their healthcare preferences and/or decisions honored. Findings included . <RESIDENT 160> Resident 160 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including aftercare following left leg amputation. Resident 160's profile information records showed the resident was self- responsible in making their own decisions. Review of Resident 160's records on 10/25/23 and 10/31/2023, showed no documentation of AD's. Review of email received on 10/31/2023 at 12:02 PM, Staff A, Administrator, indicated Resident 160's admission paperwork had not yet been completed that included information regarding AD's. <RESIDENT 32> Resident 32 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including depression and heart failure. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 5 residents (Resident 86, 14, 83, and 73) were free of unnecessary drugs due to: 1) lack of specific target behavior monitoring, 2) not obtaining the monthly orthostatic vital signs, 3) not developing and implementing non-medical behavioral interventions, and 4) not having appropriate indication, documentation, and goals for use of psychotropic medications. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications and for experiencing medication-related adverse side effects. Findings included . Review of the Food and Drugs/Drug (FDA) Safety Information reference, anti-psychotic medications have serious side effects and can be especially dangerous for elderly residents. The use of anti-psychotic medications without an adequate rationale, or for the sole purpose of limiting or controlling expressions or indications of distress without first identifying the cause, there was little chance that they would be effective, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor the medication refrigerator temperatures and ensure medications were stored in the medication room refrigerator under proper temperature controls in 2 of 3 (Central/South and Southeast) medication refrigerator observed. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective vaccines and medications with unknown potency. Findings included . In an observation on 10/26/2023 at 1:31 PM, the thermometer in the shared Central/South medication room's refrigerator temperature was 48 degrees Fahrenheit (F). The refrigerator contained vaccines, resident medications, and over the counter medications. The refrigerator temperature form showed temperatures should range from 36 degrees F to 46 degrees F with instructions to notify maintenance if recorded temperatures are above or below range on 2 sequential readings 30 minutes apart. Review of the shared Central/South Unit medication room refrigerator temperature log, dated 10/01/2023 through 10/26/2023, showed 20 missing readings with 10 out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to their call lights for 2 of 3 sample residents (Resident 75 and 94), reviewed for quality of life. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 75> Resident 75 admitted to the facility on [DATE], most recently readmitted on [DATE], diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often very rapid heart rhythm), and weakness. Review of Resident 75's care plan, dated 04/18/2022, showed the resident had a deficit in their ability to care for themselves related to weakness and was at risk for falls. Interventions included to encourage Resident 75 to use their call light for assistance and to have their call light within reach. In an observation and interview on 10/25/2023 at 11:21 AM, Resident 75's call light was observed on the floor. Resident 75 stated they would like a glass of cold ice water.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse/neglect policy and procedure to thoroughly investigate injuries of unknown source for potential abuse/neglect for 2 of 4 residents (Resident 57 and 75) reviewed. Failure to thoroughly investigate injuries of unknown source placed residents at risk for continued abuse/neglect. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Policy and Procedure Abuse, Neglect, Abandonment, Financial Exploitation and Misappropriation of Resident Property, dated January 2017, showed the facility will ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, mistreatment, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, and injuries of unknown sources are reported immediately to appropriate agencies in accordance with federal and state law. <RESIDENT 57> Resident 57 admitted to the facility on [DATE], and most recently readmitted on [DATE], with diagnosis to include Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written notice of transfer to the resident and/or the resident's representative describing the reason for transfer for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 48 and 6) reviewed for transfer notifications regarding hospitalization. This failed practice disallowed the residents and/or their representative an opportunity to fully understand the rationale and resident rights associated with the discharges. Findings included . <RESIDENT 48> Resident 48 was admitted to the facility originally on 06/24/2021 and then again on 08/22/2022 following hospitalization. Review of Resident 48's medical records showed the resident transferred to the hospital on [DATE] related to acute changes in their medical status. The medical record did not show documentation that a written notice of transfer and discharge was provided to Resident 48, their representative, and to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. In an interview on 10/31/2023 at 9:40 AM Staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notice in writing at the time of transfer to the hospital or within 24 hours of transfer to the hospital for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 48) reviewed for hospitalizations. This failed practice placed residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding the right to hold their beds while they were at the hospital. Findings included . A review of Resident 48's nursing progress notes and admission/discharge history notes, showed the resident discharged from facility to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 48's medical records revealed no documentation the resident or the resident's representative had been provided with a written bed hold notification at time of discharge or within 24 hours of discharge. In an interview on 10/31/2023 at 9:12 AM, Staff L, Registered Nurse/Resident Care Manager, stated the nurse sending a resident to the hospital was responsible to notify the resident and/or the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete an updated Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a screening tool used to determine if a person has an intellectual disability or has indicators for serious mental illness) for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 73) reviewed for PASRR accuracy who required a Level II evaluation (Level II evaluation - more in depth mental health evaluation than the screening PASRR) due to a new mental health diagnosis. This failed practice placed the resident at risk of not receiving specialized mental health services, for unidentified needs, and for a decrease in their quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Resident Assessment - Coordinator with PASRR Program, undated, showed that any resident that shows newly evident or a possible mental health disorder would be referred promptly to the state mental health authority for a Level II resident review. Resident 73 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive, person-centered care plans to meet the needs of 2 of 4 residents (Resident 86 and 32) reviewed for care planning. This failure placed residents at risk for weight loss, inadequate tube feeding (a flexible tube placed into the stomach to help get nutrition when a person was unable to eat) management, unmanaged pain, not honoring resident's preferences, not receiving necessary care and services, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated February 2023, showed the care planning process is to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan (a means to focus on the resident as the focus of control and support the resident in making their own choices and having control over their daily lives) for each resident within 21 days of admission. All Care Assessment Areas (CAA - a systematic process to interpret the triggered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise care plans for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 53 and 57) reviewed for care planning. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, adverse health effects and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Comprehensive Care Plans, dated February 2023, showed the care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment. The policy did not include care plan revisions for changes in the residents' conditions. <RESIDENT 53> Resident 53 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include a stroke resulting in left side weakness and paralysis. Review of Resident 53's admission MDS assessment, dated 10/16/2023, showed the resident had an indwelling catheter (a tube inserted into the urinary bladder to drain urine). Review of Resident 53's treatment administration records (TAR)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oral hygiene was performed for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 33) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). This failure placed the resident at risk for poor oral hygiene, dental complications, decreased self-esteem, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 33 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's Disease (progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). Review of Resident 33's care plan, dated 07/11/2023, showed the resident had their own teeth and required total assistance with oral care. Review of Resident 33's Documentation Survey Report v2 (a comprehensive report that detailed cares provided for a resident) for October 2023, showed Resident 33's oral hygiene was not completed on 10/11/2023 day and evening shift. On 10/15/2023 Resident 33 was noted to be independent with their oral hygiene. In an interview on 10/24/2023 at 11:23 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly provide professional standards of care and services for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 28 and 73) reviewed for unnecessary medications and 1 of 1 resident (Resident 86) reviewed for medication management. The facility failed to obtain laboratory samples per physician orders, and to recognize low blood pressure (BP) results, reassess abnormal BP values, and notify the provider of abnormal findings. This failed practice placed residents at risk for medication complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Vital Signs, dated 2021, showed licensed nurses were responsible for knowing the usual range of a residents vital signs, analyzing, and interpreting routine vital signs, and notifying the physician of abnormal findings. <MEDICATION MANAGEMENT> Resident 86 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with cardiac diagnoses to include hypertension (high b/p) and vascular disease (disease of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-31 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were provided to maintain, increase, and/or prevent further decrease in range of motion for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 100) reviewed for limited range of motion. This failure placed the resident at risk for a decline in their functional ability and their quality of life. Findings included . Review of a facility policy titled Restorative Nursing Documentation, undated, showed the facility was to maintain complete, accurate, and organized documentation of restorative treatments and the response to those treatments. Resident 100 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Rhabdomyolysis (damaged muscles that release protein into the blood), a fall at home, and a failure to thrive (a term used to describe broad declines in multiple areas to include weight loss, decreased appetite, poor nutrition, and inactivity). Review of Resident 100's admission Minimum Data Set assessment (an assessment tool), dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 (Resident 53, 33, and 67) residents reviewed for urinary catheters (flexible tubes inserted into the bladder to drain urine) received the necessary care and services to achieve their optimal level of urinary function. Failure to identify the reason for a resident's treatment with a urinary catheter, to maintain documentation to support why an indwelling catheter was replaced and a trial void order was not completed as ordered, there was a lack of documentation why the physician was not notified per their physician order when there was a low urinary output, and there was a failure to documentation the facility had counseled the resident/representative of the risks and benefits of a urinary catheter. These failures placed residents at risk for infection, pain, discomfort, bleeding, and complications related to urinary catheter use, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (Resident 32) reviewed for respiratory care and services were provided care consistent with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to ensure the resident received oxygen as it was prescribed by the physician and failed to ensure oxygen (O2) administration tubing was appropriately maintained, changed regularly, and dated. This failure placed residents at risk for contaminated care equipment, not receiving physician ordered services, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Administration, undated, showed oxygen is administered under orders of a physician. Staff were to monitor ongoing assessment of the residents' oxygen use and notify if there is a need for changes. Oxygen tubing is changed weekly and as needed if it became soiled or contaminated. Staff were to initial and date the tubing. When oxygen tubing was not in use, it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an adequate rationale for not following pharmacist recommendations for 3 of 5 residents (Resident 86, 310, and 14) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents at risk for experiencing the use of unnecessary medications and a potential diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 86> Review of the pharmacy consultant Medication Regimen Review (MRR), dated 10/12/2023, showed a request to evaluate citalopram hydrobromide (a medication used to treat depression) due to the off label/non-Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved indication mood disorder being used. The pharmacist requested clarification if Resident 86 had a diagnosis of depression, or the medication was being used off label as mood disorder. Collateral Contact 2 (CC2), Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP), circled used off label for mood disorder. CC2 signed the pharmacist recommendation on 10/18/2023 as agree but did not include a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0811 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are assessed for appropriateness for a feeding assistant program, receive services as per their plan of care, and feeding assistants are trained and supervised.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure cognitively impaired residents were fed by assistants that were properly trained for 2 of 4 sampled staff (Staff W and Staff X) observed providing feeding assistance to residents (Resident 26 and 28). This failure placed residents at risk of choking and aspiration (inhalation of food or fluid into the lungs) and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . In the entrance conference meeting on 10/24/2023 at 8:58 AM, Staff A, Administrator, stated they did not have any paid feeding assistants in the facility. <STAFF W> Review of Staff W's employee record showed they were hired on 03/16/2020. Staff W was currently employed as an activity assistant, and there was no record the staff had been trained as a paid feeding assistant. Review of Resident 26's Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment too) assessment, dated 10/11/2023, showed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident 26's nutritional assessment, dated 10/04/2023, showed the resident had an altered diet due to difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 4 nutrition refrigerators/freezers (North Hall) reviewed for food storage. Failure to label foods with dates they were opened or discard dates, and discard expired food, placed residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings included . Observation on 10/24/2023 at 10:10 AM, the North Hall Pantry Refrigerator/Freezer a sign on the refrigerator stated: Attention Staff -When a resident has food brought in, it must have their name on it. I will throw it away otherwise. All food will be thrown out after three days unless it has a manufacturer date on it, like yogurt or cheese sticks etc. All other items regardless of where it came from can only be in the fridge for 3 days. After 3 days, I toss out foods and put any container in the sink to be picked up. Only the resident's foods are allowed to be in the fridge. NO Staff food or drinks. Observation on 10/24/2023 at 10:10…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control standards during medication administration for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 116) observed for medication administration, and 1 of 1 residents (Resident 67) observed during care of a urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine.) This failure placed residents at risk for developing infections and for experiencing a decreased quality of life. Finding included . <RESIDENT 67> Resident 67 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently following hospitalization on 08/14/2023 with diagnoses to include heart disease/failure, urinary tract infection and presence of an indwelling urinary catheter (is a hollow, partially flexible tube that collects urine from the bladder and leads to a drainage bag). In an observation and interview on 10/23/2023 at 1:05 PM, Staff FF, Nursing Assistant Certified (NAC), was observed providing catheter care (washing the external portion of catheter and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$121,447 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $51,500 — penalty dated 2024-05-02
  • $69,947 — penalty dated 2023-10-31

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
BETHANY OF THE NORTHWESTOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/21/2025
DEGROODT, PATRICIAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/01/2023
DOBLER, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/23/2025
GAY, JEFFIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/24/2017
IHLE, LORENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/23/2025
JACOBSON, STEVENIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/27/2018
KNUDSON, VERONICAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/23/2025
KOENIG, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/01/2007
NESSE, JANICEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/23/2025
NICHOLSON, ERICIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/26/2023
ROHDE, TOMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 06/07/2018
SEYED ALIROTEH, MAHDIESADATIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 04/04/2024
STAVE, LAWRENCEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/23/2025
TIU, SUSANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/03/2019
WALLIN, TERRIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 07/23/2020
SCRIVENS, JOSEPHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/06/2019
BAUGUESS, TRISTINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/26/2025
LAGERSTROM, CHRISTINEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/25/2025
TOOR, NAVDEEPIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.0M
Related-party expense6% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 10%Other / private 23%

This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$456per resident / day
operating cost
$13,865per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$459per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505403. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-20, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next