Everett Transitional Care Services

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.51 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 71% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 62 beds and averages 58.5 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.26 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.32 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.30 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.78 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.46 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.46 to 0.96 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-05-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent an accident for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 1) reviewed for burns. Resident 1 experienced harm when facility staff heated food and then failed to ensure safe temperatures prior to serving the resident, resulting in second degree burns. The facility failed to report to the appropriate state agencies at the time of the incident. This failure also placed other residents at risk of serious injury and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of a facility policy titled Microwave Reheating Guidelines updated 10/01/2022 showed; Policy Statement: Foods and fluids heated in the microwave are served to residents at safe temperatures- 7. Temperature is taken prior to service to the residents. Hot beverages and hot foods are served to residents at less than or greater than 145 degrees. <RESIDENT 1>Resident 1 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Rheumatoid arthritis, diabetes, kidney disease…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-12-15 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure respiratory care and services were provided in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 14, 15, and 41) reviewed for respiratory care. Failure to change oxygen (O2) tubing routinely, failure to have appropriate orders for O2 administration and failure to have warning signs posted on resident's doors placed residents at risk for respiratory complications, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, dated 2025, documented that O2 is administered to residents who need it and consistent with professional standards of practice. Staff shall perform infection controls measures that include changing O2 tubing and nasal cannula (NC - medical tube that delivers supplemental O2 to the nose) weekly. Nebulizer (medical device that turns liquid medication into a breathable mist to be inhaled deep to treat…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans to include all provided nursing services for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 41 and 15) reviewed for oxygen (O2) and 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 41) reviewed for unnecessary medications related to mental health. These failures placed residents at risk of unmet care needs, decline in condition, and diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, dated 2025, documented that the facility will develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, that includes measurable objectives and time frames to meet the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs. All Care Area Assessments (CAAs - triggered care areas from the MDS) triggered by the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) will be considered in developing the care plan.Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage and labeling of insulin (a medication that controls blood sugars) in 1 of 4 medication carts (Cart 4) when reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving expired medications, ineffective treatment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of a facility policy titled, Medication Storage - Storage of Medications, dated 01/25, documented insulin products should be stored in the refrigerator until they were opened. The date is noted on the label of the insulin vials and pens (a device to inject insulin) when first used. Opened insulin vials may be stored in the refrigerator or at room temperature. Open insulin pens should be stored at room temperature. The policy directed the staff member to refer to the specific product labeling for additional details. Review of Lispro (a rapid-acting insulin) and Glargine (a long-acting insulin) insulin vial and pen manufactures recommendations, documented the insulin was good for 28 days once opened…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise care plans for four of 14 residents (Residents 3, 11, 43 and 57) reviewed for care planning. The failure to review and revise care plans by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment placed the residents at risk for weight loss, dehydration, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <RESIDENT 57> Resident 57 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include essential tremor and gait and mobility abnormalities. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS, an assessment tool) assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident 57 required supervision or touching assistance for eating. Review of Resident 57's care plan on 02/11/2025 at 1:09 PM, showed the resident had an activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to tremors in their upper extremities. The care plan directed staff to use a cup with lid for hot liquids. The care plan did not include the feeding…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0730 — pattern
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure annual Nurse Aide Certified (NAC) performance reviews were completed for five of five employees (J, P, Q, R, and S) reviewed, who had been employed longer than 1 year. This failed practice had the potential to negatively affect the competency of these NACs, and the quality of care provided to residents. Findings included . Review of the staff roster provided on 02/13/2025, showed Staff J was hired on 02/25/2022, Staff P was hired on 06/13/2022, Staff Q was hired on 02/02/2022, Staff R was hired on 06/28/2021 and Staff S was hired on 07/11/2023. In an interview on 02/13/2024 at 3:28 PM, Staff T, Registered Nurse/Staff Development, stated they were new to the position, and they were in the process of putting in structures to ensure evaluations were completed for NAC's. There were no evaluations provided by Staff T for the NAC's identified. In an interview on 02/14/2025 at 10:09 AM, Staff A, stated they were aware of annual evaluations had not been completed as required. Staff A stated they had recently begun to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were served in a timely manner and at a palatable temperature on 1 of 2 floors (5th Floor). Failure to ensure timely meal delivery could negatively impact the residents' nutritional status, appetite, and meal acceptance. Findings included . Record review of the posted hall mealtimes for the 5th floor showed: - Breakfast 8:35 -8:45 AM, - Lunch 1:10-1:20 PM, - Dinner 6:35-6:45 PM. In an observation on 02/10/2025, a meal cart with breakfast trays was delivered to the 5th floor at 9:05 AM. In an observation and interview on 02/10/25 at 1:26 PM, Resident 9's meal was delivered. Resident 9 stated their soup was cold and the staff does not heat up their cold food, at 2:49 PM Resident 9's meal tray was still sitting in front of them. In an observation on 02/10/2025 at 1:27 PM, Resident 57's lunch tray was delivered to their room. In an observation on 02/10/2025 at 1:31 PM, the second tray cart was delivered to the 5th floor. Staff began passing the trays from the second cart at 1:37 PM. In an observation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-02-14 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 2 of 5 nurse aides (Staff P and S) had their required 12 hours of in-service training, and 5 of 5 nurse aides (Staff J, P, Q, R and S) failed to receive the required dementia training. The failure to ensure Nursing Assistants Certified (NACs) received 12 hours per year in-service training and required dementia training placed residents at risk of less than competent care and services from staff. Findings included . In a review of the nursing aides' training hours showed Staff P and S, Certified Nursing Assistants, (NAC), had did not have receive a minimum of 12 hours of training within the year. In a review of the nurse aides' dementia training, showed Staff J, P, Q, R and S, NACs, did not receive dementia training. In an interview on 02/13/2024 at 3:28 PM Staff T, Registered Nurse/Staff Development, stated they were new to the position, and they were in the process of putting in structures to ensure required trainings and skills checks were completed for NAC's. In an interview on 02/14/2025 at 10:09 AM, Staff A,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary assistance for eating, and drinking, for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 16 and 57) dependent on staff to ensure their needs were met. The failed practice placed residents at increased risk for medical complications, poor quality of life and psychosocial harm. Findings included . <RESIDENT 57> Resident 57 admitted [DATE] with diagnoses to include essential tremors, muscle weakness and lack of coordination. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] showed the resident required supervision or touching assistance for eating. Review of the care plan on 02/11/2025 at 1:09 PM, showed the resident had an ADL self-care performance deficit related to tremors in their upper extremities. The care plan directed staff to use a cup with lid for hot liquids. The care plan did not include the feeding assistance needed for Resident 57. In an observation on 02/10/2025 at 1:27 PM, Resident 57's lunch tray was delivered to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 residents (Resident 21) reviewed received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice and received the necessary care and services to attain or maintain their highest practicable level of well-being. The facility failed to assess and alert the physician of elevated blood sugar levels and hold medications as directed for abnormal vital signs. This placed the residents at increased risk of unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility's Medication Administration General Guidelines, dated January 2025, directed nurses to administer medications in accordance with written orders of the prescriber. The guidelines directed staff to obtain and record any vital signs as necessary prior to medication administration. The American Heart Association, dated April 21, 2017, considered a blood pressure to be within the normal range when both systolic and diastolic numbers were in these ranges: a normal reading…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (Resident 21) reviewed for dialysis services received consistent, ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding care and services for dialysis residents. These failures failure had the potential to cause unmet care needs, medical complications, inadequate quality of care, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . A review of the facility's policy, titled Hemodialysis dated August 2024, showed that the facility will assure that each resident received care and services for the provision of hemodialysis consistent with professional standards of practice to including the ongoing assessment of the resident's condition and monitoring for complications before or after dialysis treatments. <RESIDENT 21> Resident 21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of end stage renal (kidney) disease (stage of renal impairment that is irreversible and permanent), dependent on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$14,380 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $14,380 — penalty dated 2026-05-15

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $409K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA