Crystal Cove Post Acute
1505 Carpenter Road SE, Lacey, WA 98503 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 96 certified beds · (360) 491-1765 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it’s on the federal Special Focus watch list for a persistent pattern of problems
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0568, F0569)
- inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (137) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $235,475 in federal fines (most recent 2026-06-02)
- nursing-staff turnover (70%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | Not rated — CMS suppresses ratings for Special Focus Facilities |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-04, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
CMS has published no overall rating for this home since 2026-04 — most often because it is a Special Focus Facility, whose rating CMS withholds. The line above is where the record stops; we do not carry the last star forward, and it is not this home’s rating today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.3% | 14.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 6.8% | 5.5% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.5% | 1.0% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.8% | 17.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 2.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 16.3% | 17.2% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 7.5% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.8% | 93.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 9.3% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.0% | 22.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.4% | 15.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 61.5% | 82.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.4% | 19.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 20.6% | 13.4% | 12.0% | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 123 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 44.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.11 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 7% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 3% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.8%CMS range 31.7–47.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 7.9%CMS range 5.5–11.0 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 44.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 38.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 38.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 90.6% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.6% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.2% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.2%CMS range 3.3–9.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.84 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 96 beds and averages 88.3 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.00 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 70% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
137 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 120 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-03-12 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff performed Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR/an emergency procedure consisting of chest compressions combined with giving breaths of air) and failed to assure required staff had unexpired CPR certifications for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) who was found unresponsive and had a physician's order for CPR. The failure of facility staff to initiate CPR placed all residents who chose to have CPR initiated at risk for serious injury, harm, impairment or death and represented an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) situation. On [DATE] at 2:45 PM, the facility was notified of an IJ at CRF 483.24 (a)(3), F678 CPR, the IJ was determined to have begun on [DATE] when the facility failed to perform CPR. The facility's failure placed residents at risk for serious injury, harm, impairment or death. The facility removed the immediacy on [DATE] with an onsite verification by the investigator by review of staff education, verification staff obtained active CPR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely assessment and treatment by a qualified professional in response to a significant and acute change in condition for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 5) reviewed for death in the facility. Resident 5, who had a recent history of aspiration (inhalation of foreign material into the lungs), experienced harm when they vomited, and experienced a sudden change in breathing pattern with bluing around the lips and eventually expired. These failures placed residents at risk of not receiving basic life support and a delay of care and treatment, serious harm, impairment or death and constituded an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ). On [DATE] at 4:02 PM, the facility was notified of an IJ at CFR 483.25, F684, Quality of Care, related to the facility's failure to provide timely assessment and/or treatment by qualified personnel (nursing) when there was a delay in locating nursing staff due to lack of a working emergency response system determined to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-06-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely recognize and respond to an acute clinical change in condition, contact on-call clinical leaership if the resident's condition does not clearly support in-house monitoring, and contact emergency medical services timely when the resident's condition appeared unstable or life threatening for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for an acute change of condition. Resident 1 experienced harm when the facility delayed obtaining emergency medical services and access to a higher level of care despite signs and symptoms consistent with a significant change in neurological status. The resident was subsequently transferred to the hospital where they were diagnosed with a non-operable intracranial hemorrhage (brain bleed). Findings included.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of rib fractures related to a fall (prior to facility admission) and a pulmonary embolus (clot in lung).In an interview on 05/27/2026 at 12:53 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide staff supervision and implement fall prevention strategies for a resident assessed at high fall risk for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for falls. Resident 1, who had at least three prior unwitnessed falls from their bed, experienced harm when they were positioned on the edge of their bed unsupervised, was subsequently found on the floor and required transfer to the hospital where they were diagnosed with multiple fractures at the right wrist. This failure placed resident at risk for falls, injury and decreased quality of life. The findings included.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including end stage renal disease (ESRD) (kidneys are failing and can no longer filter waste from the blood and requires dialysis or a kidney transplant), and atrial fibrillation (irregular and often rapid heart rhythm). The resident's Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 10/16/2025, showed the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate care and services were provided to promote wound healing and prevent pressure ulcers from developing or worsening by implementing and following care interventions timely for 4 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 5 and 6) reviewed for pressure ulcers. Resident 1 experienced harm when the resident's skin was not assessed, and they developed an unstageable pressure ulcer to the left heel with no treatment initiated for 12 days. These failures placed residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers, infection, medical complications and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility policy, titled, Skin Assessment, undated showed a full body, or head to toe, skin assessment will be conducted by a licensed or registered nurse upon admission/re-admission, daily for three days, and weekly thereafter. The assessment may also be performed after a change of condition or after any newly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure their systems were in place to address and monitor weight loss experienced by 2 of 4 residents (Resident 71 and 65) reviewed for nutrition and failed to monitor and implement accurate fluid restrictions for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 1, 6, and 12) reviewed for fluid restrictions. Resident 71 experienced harm when the facility failed to obtain weekly weights per their care plan, update the physician with the registered dietician's recommendations to add an appetite stimulant and calorie supplement and failed to offer supplemental food when the resident consumed less that fifty percent of their meal that resulted in a significant weight loss of 14.41 percent in 55 days. Resident 65 experienced harm when the facility failed to ensure adequate supplement intake or modify dietary interventions, that resulted in a significant weight loss of 16.64 percent in 113 days. These failures placed residents at risk of fluid imbalances,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from avoidable accidents during a resident transfer for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accidents. Resident 1 experienced harm when facility staff did not follow recommended procedures for transportation and the resident sustained a fracture and laceration requiring hospitalization and surgery. This failure placed residents at risk for injury and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the undated facility policy, titled Recommended Safe Procedure for Transporting People who use Wheelchairs showed when loading and unloading passengers in a side loading van, the resident should be facing away from the vehicle. The policy reference emergency safety procedures and identified staff should immediately call 911 if a person in a wheelchair (w/c) was injured or if there was any question of an injury. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including End Stage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable homelike environment by not providing adequate temperatures in resident rooms in 1 of 4 hallways reviewed for comfortable temperature. This failure placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life.The findings included.During the facility tour with Staff C, Maintenance Director, room temperatures were checked in four halls. The following temperatures were noted:room [ROOM NUMBER] - 84.4 degrees Fahrenheit (F)room [ROOM NUMBER] - 80 degrees [NAME] 4 - 80.2 degrees [NAME] 6 - 82.2 degrees [NAME] 7 - 84.5 degrees [NAME] 9 - 82 degrees [NAME] 11 - 84 degrees FDuring an interview on 06/15/2026 at 4:20 PM, Resident 9 stated her room was too warm.During an interview on 06/15/2026 at 4:22 PM, Resident 7 stated to Staff C the room was too hot and requested the window open. During an interview on 06/15/2026 at 4:25 PM, Resident 11 stated the room was too warm. The resident stated the fan that was in the room burnt out and the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure new interventions were appropriately developed or timely initiated in an effort to prevent future falls and failed to supervise residents to prevent falls for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2 and 3) reviewed for accidents. These failures placed residents at risk of injuries, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of the facility policy, titled Fall Management, dated 10/05/2025, showed .The facility will assess the resident upon admission/readmission, quarterly, with significant change in condition, and with any fall event for any fall risks and will identify appropriate interventions to minimize the risk of injury related to falls.The interventions to reduce the risk of falls should be individualized based on the resident's risk factors and fall history.Resident 1Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a decline in mental ability that is severe enough to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of the facility policy, observation, interview and record review the facility failed to document timely dishwasher temperatures, failed to complete dishwasher chemical sanitation testing and failed to serve food at appropriate temperatures for 2 of 4 halls reviewed. This failure placed residents at increased risk for foodborne illnesses and decreased quality of life. The findings included.Review of the facility policy titled, Dishwasher Temperature, undated showed .4. For low temperature dishwashers (chemical sanitation) .The wash temperature shall be 120 [degrees] F [Fahrenheit].The sanitizing solution shall be 50 ppm (parts per million) hypochlorite (chlorine) (solution used for widespread disinfection) on dish surface in final rinse.5. Chemical solutions shall be maintained at the correct concentration, based on periodic testing, at least once per shift, and for the effective contact time according to manufacturer's guidelines. Results of concentration checks shall be recorded.6. Water temperatures shall be measured and recorded prior to each meal/or after the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-10 · tag F0851 — isolatedElectronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to submit complete and accurate direct care staffing information to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS- a federal agency managing healthcare programs and health insurance standards) for Quarter 3 (Q3, July 2025, August 2025, September 2025) reviewed for Payroll Based Journal (PBJ-mandatory reporting of staffing information based on payroll data) submission. This failure affected the accuracy of Nursing Home (NH) staffing level data collected by CMS and had the potential to impact provisions of resident care and services. Findings included. Review of the June 2022, CMS Long-Term Care Facility PBJ Policy Manual, showed long term care facilities were required to electronically submit direct care staffing information based on payroll and auditable data. The data can be used to not only report on the level of staff in each nursing home, but reports staff turnover and tenure, that can impact the quality of care delivered at the facility. The policy manual showed the facility must electronically submit complete and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-12 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of the facility policy, interview and record review the facility failed to provide written notice of bed holds (holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident was absent from the facility) given at the time of hospital transfer for 2 of 7 residents (Resident 11 and 13) reviewed for discharge process. This failure placed residents at risk of not being informed of their rights. Findings included .Findings included.Review of the facility policy, titled Bed Hold Notice, undated, documented .in the event of an emergency transfer of a resident, the facility will provide written notice of the facility's bed-hold policies to the resident and/or the resident representative within 24 hours.The facility will keep a signed and dated copy of the bed-hold notice information given to the resident and/or resident representative in the resident's file and/or medical record.Resident 11Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 3) reviewed for therapy services. This failure placed residents at risk for decline in mobility, functional ability and a decreased quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility policy, titled Restorative Nursing Programs undated, documented .It is the policy of this facility to provide maintenance and restorative services designed to maintain or improve a resident's abilities to the highest practicable test.Residents, as identified during the comprehensive assessment process, will receive services from restorative aides when they are assessed to have a need for restorative nursing services. These services may include. Passive or active range of motionSplint or brace assistance.Bed mobility training and skill practice.Training and skill practice in transfers and walking.Training and skill practice in dressing and/or grooming.Training and skill practice in eating and/or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the shower rooms were clean and in good condition, for 4 of 4 shower rooms (Hall A & Hall C [two shower rooms each]) reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk of feeling their showers were not homelike or clean, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.During an interview on 01/05/2026 at 1:02 PM, Resident 66 said the shower rooms were dirty, that if you went into any of the shower rooms you would see how dirty they were. Resident 66 said they asked for garbage bags to be put on their feet because of how gross the shower rooms were. During an observation on 01/05/2026 at 1:25 PM, Hall A's shower, between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS], were checked. Observation showed the painted tiles were peeling, near the shower controls, bar, and sides. Paint along the baseboard was peeling. Two pieces of trash were seen on the floor, one appeared to be a seal flap (of an opened container), and the other object was a thin peel of debris (looked like it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-13 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — patternPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications (any drug that alters the brain affecting mood, behavior, perception and thought processes) were regularly monitored and documented on for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 22, 6, and 9) reviewed for unnecessary medication. This failure placed residents at risk of unnecessary medication usage and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Resident 22 Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 10/16/2025, showed the resident was cognitively intact, had diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder (a psychiatric condition that may occur in people who have experienced or witnessed a traumatic event or series of traumatic events), bipolar disorder (mental health condition causing extreme mood swings), depression (persistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest), and anxiety (intense, excessive and persistent worry or fear). The MDS showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 7 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 22, 8, 12, 11, 15, 6 & 94) reviewed care plans. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving needed services, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of care.Findings included .Resident 22Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 22 had orders for the following psychotropic medications (drugs that alter brain chemistry to treat mental illness by affecting the central nervous system).- Wellbutrin (an antidepressant) once daily for major depressive disorder, dated 11/12/2024.- Lexapro (an antidepressant and anxiolytic) once daily for depression, dated 10/08/2024- Eszopiclone (a sedative hypnotic) once daily at bedtime for insomnia, dated 09/25/2025.- Seroquel (an antipsychotic) twice daily for bipolar disorder, dated 02/04/2025. A psychotropic medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents remained free of unnecessary drugs for 3 of 5 residents (7, 22, and 6) reviewed for unnecessary drugs. This failure placed residents at risk for increased sedation, inadequate pain relief, and a decreased quality of life.Findings included .Resident 7Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a malignant neoplasm (cancerous tumor) of the large intestines. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), dated 12/11/2025 documented Resident 7 was cognitively intact and had pain that occasionally affected sleep, therapy and day to day activities. A review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed orders:-Monitor pain every shift and non-pharmacological interventions for pain management A -Reposition; B -Rest; C - Apply Ice (with MD [Medical Director] order); D -Quiet Environment; E – Other (Document in progress note) dated 12/25/2025.-Hydromorphone give 3 tablets by mouth every 4 hours as needed for pain and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 120 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was stored in manners that met professional standards of practice, for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms (A&B Medication Room) and 2 of 2 medication carts (Halls C &B) reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving expired medications, cross-contamination, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.During an observation of the A&B Medication Room on 01/06/2026 at 9:26 AM, Staff C, Infection Preventionist/ Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), was present for review of the medications. A purified protein derivative (PPD, a test for Tuberculosis) multiuse vial was missing an open date. Staff C confirmed this and said it looked empty (had been used). An emergency kit, with medication in it, had an expiration date listed of 12/2025. Staff C confirmed this. The posted medication refrigerator log for January 2026, had columns that specified staff were to check temperature in the morning and at night due to the Centers of Disease Control and Prevention recommendation for if vaccines…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents approved of a 15-hour mealtime gap and were served a nourishing snack at bedtime, when the time between the dinner and breakfast meals was increased to 15 hours. This failure placed residents at risk of feelings of hunger and inadequate nutrition.Findings included.Review of the Resident Council (a self-governed, resident-led group) Minutes, dated 08/07/2025, included the following mealtime schedule:a) The Main Dining room was served dinner at 4:30 PM and breakfast at 7:30 AM (for a total of 15 hours in between meals).b) The A Hall was served dinner at 5:00 PM and breakfast at 8:00 AM (15 hours in between meals).c) The B Hall was served dinner at 5:20 PM and breakfast at 8:20 AM (15 hours in between meals).d) The C Hall was served dinner at 5:40 PM and breakfast at 8:40 AM (15 hours in between meals).e) The D hall was served dinner at 6:00 PM and breakfast at 9:00 AM (15 hours in between meals).Further review of the Resident Council Minutes, dated 08/07/2025, showed the dining time had been changed, and a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-13 · tag F0887 — patternEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system that ensured residents were screened, educated and offered the COVID-19 (a contagious disease caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2) vaccine for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 15 & 7) when reviewed for immunizations. This failure precluded residents from the opportunity to make an informed decision regarding receiving Covid-19 vaccines. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated Infection Prevention and Control Program policy showed residents would be screened to see if they were prior immunized or had medical contraindications prior to being offered the COVID-19 vaccination. Once screened, education about the vaccine, risks, benefits, and potential side effects would be given to the resident/resident representative and the COVID vaccination offered. If the resident/resident representative consented, the COVID vaccination would be administered. The resident's electronic health record (EHR) would include documentation that indicated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure dignity was provided to 2 of 2 Residents (6 & 79) reviewed for resident rights during a meeting with Resident Counsel. This failure placed the residents at risk for diminished self-worth and a decreased quality of life.Findings Included.Resident 6Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool), dated 12/16/2025, documented Resident 6 was cognitively intact. On 01/07/2026 at 11:00 AM Resident 6 said they felt harassed when Staff R, Business Office Manager, asked them why aren't you paying your bill? Resident 6 said if your bill is not paid [Staff R] will hassle you. Resident 79Resident 79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented Resident 79 was cognitively intact.On 01/07/2026 at 11:00 AM Resident 79 said they also felt harassed by Staff R, Business Office Manager, when they had asked about a bill not being paid one month. On 01/07/2026 at 3:14 PM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to communicate resolutions about the concerns brought forward by the resident council (RC) for 6 of 6 months (July, August, September, October, November and December 2025) of RC minutes reviewed. These failures resulted in RC members feeling frustrated, unheard and powerless to affect their care.Findings included .Review of the facility's Resident and Family Grievances policy, dated 2025, showed In accordance with the resident's right to obtain a written decision regarding his or her grievance, the Grievance Official will issue a written decision on the grievance to the resident or representative at the conclusion of the investigation. The written decision will include at a minimum:i. The date the grievance was received. ii. The steps taken to investigate the grievance.iii. A summary of the pertinent findings or conclusions regarding the resident's concern(s).iv. A statement as to whether the grievance was confirmed or not confirmed.v. Any corrective action taken or to be taken by the facility as a result of the grievance.vi.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received their personal funds (money kept for the resident by the facility) within 30 days of discharge for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 107) reviewed for personal funds with discharge. This failure placed residents at risk of delay in access to their money and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled Resident Personal Funds, dated 2025, showed upon discharge, eviction, or death, a resident with personal funds deposited with the facility, would receive from the facility within 30 days, their funds and a final account of those funds. Review of the refund request form for Resident 107, showed they were discharged on 06/24/2025. Review of the facility's copy of the check they provided Resident 107 to return their money after discharge, showed the check was written on 07/29/2025. During an interview on 01/07/2026 at 9:38 AM, Staff R, Business Office Manager, confirmed Resident 107 was discharged on 06/24/2025 and was not written a check within 30 days, until…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a fall with injury for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 52) reviewed for falls. The facility's failure to identify and assess the location where a fall occurred, to identify and consider what environmental factors such as uneven surfaces, and insufficient lighting, were present at the time of the fall and to interview all residents and staff with knowledge about the incident, prevented facility staff from identifying the external factors that were present and led to the residents fall. These failures detracted from the ability to identify what interventions needed to be implemented to prevent reoccurrence and placed residents at risk for continued falls and injuries. Findings included . Resident 52 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 11/10/2025, showed the resident was cognitively intact, was independent with activities of daily living, able to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurate for 2 of 21 sampled residents (Resident 33 & 6) reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk of a lack of care or services related to the assessments, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Resident 33 Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], documented Resident 33 was cognitively intact and relied on staff for all cares. The MDS documented Resident 33 did not complain, have difficulty and or pain with swallowing or chewing food. On 01/05/2026 at 3:10 PM, Resident 33 reported they had missing and broken teeth and a number of their teeth had fallen out. Resident 33 said it had been almost a year since they had been to a dentist and they wanted to get their teeth fixed, because it was causing pain when they ate. Resident 33 said they could not chew meat, it had to be cut up very small, or sugar, due to causing pain and missing fillings,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for 6 of 21 sample residents (Resident 22, 87, 21, 8, 12 & 72) reviewed. The failure to obtain, follow and/or clarify physician's orders when indicated, and to only sign for tasks they completed, placed residents at risk for medication errors, respiratory infections, unmet care needs and other adverse health outcomes.Findings included Resident 22 Resident 22 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated10/16/2025, showed the resident was cognitively intact, had a diagnosis of chronic lung disease and received oxygen therapy during the assessment period. On 01/05/2026 at 2:38 PM, Resident 22 was observed lying in bed receiving O2 at 3L(liters)/min (minute) via NC (nasal cannula). Record review showed Resident 22 had an order for continuous oxygen at 2L/min via NC, dated 2/08/2025, and a 10/08/2024 order that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions to prevent development or promote pressure ulcer healing were implemented as ordered for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 72) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure placed residents at risk of worsening wounds, delay in care, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled, Pressure Injury Prevention and Management, dated 03/19/2025, showed the facility were to implement interventions for preventing/managing pressure ulcers which included: pressure redistribution (including redistribution support surfaces [mattresses]), minimizing exposure to moisture, and maintaining or improving nutrition status when applicable.Resident 72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of malnutrition (body gets too few nutrients), spinal stenosis (narrowing within the spinal canal), anemia (abnormally low level of red blood cells, impacting oxygen delivery), paraplegia (loss of motor and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure cigarettes and failed to complete a smoking assessment for 1 of 3 residents (8) reviewed for accident hazards. The facility also failed to maintain an environment with adequate lighting (the lights were turned off) related to resident safety for 31 for 31 residents utilizing the smoking area. These failures placed residents at risk for accidents, injury and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Resident 8 Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 11/07/2025, documented the resident was cognitively intact and had current tobacco use. Unsecured Cigarettes On 01/05/2026 at 12:11 PM, Resident 8 said I have my cigarettes in my drawer. Cigarettes were observed in the top drawer of the cabinet by Resident 8's bed. On 01/06/2026 at 12:59 PM, Staff Q, Licensed Practical Nurse, went into Resident 8's room and collected the cigarettes from the drawer by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow a prescribed therapeutic diet or offer alternatives to residents on a therapeutic diet and monitor and document fluid restrictions (a diet which limits the amount of daily fluid intake) for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 12 & 94), reviewed for nutrition/hydration. This failure placed the residents at risk of inadequate diet, fluid overload, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 12-Renal Diet Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 11/18/2025, documented Resident 12 was cognitively intact and was placed on a renal diet (designed to support kidney health by limiting certain nutrients, particularly sodium, potassium, phosphorus, and protein, to help manage kidney disease and prevent further damage). Review of Resident 12's Nutritional Assessment, dated 11/17/2025, under food preferences documented, see food…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Peripherally Inserted Central Cather (PICC) line Intravenous (IV) treatments were provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 76) reviewed. These failures placed the resident who required IV services at risk for loss of vascular access and complications related to IV therapy.Findings included .A review of the facility policy titled, Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Flushing, Locking, Removal, dated 2025, stated, It is the policy of this facility to ensure that peripherally inserted central catheters (PlCC) are flushed, locked and removed with current standards if practice. And under the Flushing heading it documented 7. Slowly aspirate [withdraw fluid] for a blood return to confirm device patency.Resident 76Resident 76 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infection (a staph infection resistant to common antibiotics).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen therapy was provided in accordance with physician's orders and accepted professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 22) reviewed for respiratory care. Facility staffs' failure to administer oxygen at the physician ordered rate and to change oxygen tubing as the frequency ordered, placed residents at risk for respiratory infections and unmet respiratory needs. Findings included .Review of the facility's Oxygen Administration policy, copyright 2025, O2 (oxygen) would be administered to residents who needed it. O2 would be administered in accordance with physician's orders except in the case of an emergency. In such case, O2 would be administered and orders for the oxygen/rate would be obtained as soon as practicable and staff would document the initial and ongoing assessment of the resident's condition that warranted O2 administration and the resident's response. O2 tubing/NC (nasal cannula) would be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with Hemodialysis (dialysis, a machine that is used to remove waste and extra fluid from blood and return the filtered blood into the body), receive/obtain dialysis communication documentation including resident's plan of care and post dialysis communication, and/or follow up on dialysis recommendations for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 15 &12) reviewed for dialysis. This failure placed residents at risk for medical complications, missed dialysis treatments and a decreased quality of life. Findings included.Review of the facility polity titled, Hemodialysis, dated 2024, showed the facility was to communicate with the dialysis facility, such as using a dialysis communication form or other form, that would include: bloodwork results, vital signs, nutritional/fluid management (including resident compliance with food/fluid restrictions, and monitoring fluid intake and output measurements as ordered),and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to complete annual staff performance reviews yearly as required and provide education based on the outcome of these reviews for 1 of 1 sampled veteran staff (Staff BB) reviewed for performance reviews. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving care from inadequately trained and/or under-qualified care staff, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of Staff BB's, Nursing Assistant personnel file showed they were hired on 07/18/2023. Review of Staff BBs personnel file showed no annual performance review had been completed from July 2024 - July 2025On 01/12/2026 at 12:50 PM, Staff A, Administrator, said there was not a performance review for Staff BB as required. Reference WAC 388-97-1680 (1), (2)(a-c)
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt dental services were provided for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 33 &11) reviewed for dental services. This failure placed residents at risk for difficulty chewing, pain/discomfort due to unmet dental needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Resident 33 Resident 33 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 11/09/2025, documented Resident 33 was cognitively intact and relied on staff for all cares. On 01/05/2026 at 3:10 PM, Resident 33 reported they had missing, and broken teeth and a number of their teeth had fallen out. Resident 33 said it had been almost a year since they had been to a dentist and they wanted to get their teeth fixed, because it was causing pain when they ate. Resident 33 said they could not chew meat, it had to be cut up very small, or sugar, due to causing pain and missing fillings, and this had been going on for months…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received foods that accommodated the residents' preferences, diet types and tolerances for 3 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 12, 66 & 15) reviewed for preferences. This failure placed residents at risk for meal dissatisfaction, nutrition at risk, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Resident 12 Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 11/18/2025, documented Resident 12 was cognitively intact and was placed on a renal diet (designed to support kidney health by limiting certain nutrients, particularly sodium, potassium, phosphorus, and protein, to help manage kidney disease and prevent further damage). On 01/06/2026 at 9:42 AM, Resident 12 said the dialysis meal sent every dialysis day was a turkey sandwich (only two pieces of turkey, nothing else on the sandwich), some type of crackers or cereal bar, a Nutri grain bar, a cup of Jello…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored under sanitary conditions by not ensuring a resident refrigerator maintained cold food at or below 41 degrees Fahrenheit. This failure created the potential to expose residents to improperly stored food and increased risk of foodborne illness.Findings included .During an observation of the dining room resident refrigerator on 01/06/2026 at 11:09 AM, the refrigerator thermometer red indicator line showed a reading of 51 degrees, Staff G confirmed that the reading was 51 degrees. When asked what steps she would take now that it had been identified the refrigerator was above 41 degrees, Staff G said she would throw everything away and began removing food items from the refrigerator. On 01/07/2026 at 2:20 PM, Staff G showed there was a new resident refrigerator saying it had been placed on 01/06/2026. When asked to see the thermometer, Staff G was unable to locate it in the refrigerator and said it had been there in the morning. Staff G then asked Staff I, Admissions Director, about the thermometer and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0847 — isolatedInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's binding arbitration agreements (legal document that required the use of a third party to resolve disputes) was reviewed and explained in a form, manner, and/or language understood by the resident and/or their legal representative for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 46, 60 & 79) reviewed for binding arbitration agreements. This failure placed residents at risk for lacking understanding of the legal document signed, forfeiture (loss or giving up of something) of the right to a jury or court, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .On 01/12/2026 at 2:16 PM, when asked what their understanding of the arbitration process was, Resident 46 stated, what is that? Resident 46 said they did not know they were giving up their right to pursue litigation in a court proceeding or that they could terminate the arbitration agreement within 30 days. When it was explained they had signed the facility's arbitration agreement when they admitted to the building, Resident 46 stated, when I was admitted I was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place that ensured effective communication, collaboration, and coordination of care occurred between the facility and the hospice provider for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 87) reviewed for hospice services.The facility failed to designate a staff member to be responsible for coordinating care with hospice staff, to obtain and maintain a current copy of the coordinated hospice plan of care, and to have a system/ documentation of what hospice staff had visited (e.g., registered nurse, chaplain, certified nursing assistant, massage therapist), when they visited, and what care was provided. These failures detracted from staffs' ability to effectively communicate collaborate and coordinate care with the Hospice provider, and placed residents at risk for not receiving necessary care and services and/or unmet care needs. Findings included .Resident 87 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of a Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize an effective Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) in accordance with facility policy, state, federal and or local infection control guidelines, regulations and practices when facility staff failed: to performed required hand hygiene and gloves changes with wound care; to ensure urinals were emptied/rinsed after use; to follow standard precautions (common sense practices to prevent the spread of infection in healthcare), enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, a set of infection control measures that use gowns and gloves to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) and transmission based precautions used when someone has confirmed or suspected infections) for 2 of 3 (Residents 66 & 72) and reviewed for infection control. These failures placed residents at risk for facility acquired or healthcare-associated infections and related complications and a decreased quality of life. Findings included .WOUND…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP), to promote appropriate use of antibiotics, reduce the risk of unnecessary antibiotic use and decrease the development of antibiotic resistance and adverse side effects for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 74, 25 & 32) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. This failure placed residents at risk for potential adverse outcomes associated with the inappropriate and/or unnecessary use of antibiotics and a decreased quality of life.Findings included . 1) Resident 74 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 74's electronic health record (EHR) showed a urinalysis, dated 11/05/2025, that documented Resident 74's urine was positive for Many! bacteria. The lab did not include a culture and sensitivity (C&S, identifies the specific bacteria or fungi causing an infection and identifies which antibiotics or antifungal drugs will effectively kill or inhibit them.) On 11/08/2025 Resident 74 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-13 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure Nursing Assistants (NA) received a minimum of 12 hours of required in-service training per year which was to include dementia management, abuse prevention, and caring for individuals with cognitive impairment for 1 of 1 sampled veteran NA, (Staff BB), reviewed for staff training. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving care from inadequately trained and/or under-qualified care staff. Findings included .Review of the personnel file for Staff BB, NA, showed they were hired on 07/18/2023. Review of Staff BB's training records showed she received 6 hours of in-service training from July 2024 - July 2025 and it did not include abuse prevention.On 01/12/2026 at 12:50 PM, Staff A, Administrator, said Staff BB only received 6 of the 12 required in-service hours from July 2024 - July 2025.Reference WAC 388-97-1680 (2)(a-c)
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comfortable homelike environment by not providing adequate heat in resident rooms in 3 of 4 hallways reviewed for comfortable temperature. This failure placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of facility documentation titled, Logbook Documentation showed All buildings are required to maintain an ambient temperature throughout resident and patient care areas in a temperature range of 71 to 81 degrees Fahrenheit [F] or at a more restrictive range required by state or local requirements.During a telephone interview on 12/5/2025 at 11:00 AM, Collateral Contact 1 said they placed a digital thermometer in Resident 7's room and installed a temperature app on their phone so they could monitor the temperature of the resident's room as the room had been cold. They said Resident 11's room temperatures were as follows:10/14/2025 12:05 PM - 62 degrees F10/15/2025 2:20 PM - 61.7 degrees F10/16/2025 5:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure wound and indwelling catheter (flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) cares were provided to 1 of 3 residents (Resident 3) reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed residents at risk for developing infection and diminished quality of lifeFindings included .Review of the facility policy, titled Wound Treatment Management, undated, showed, wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing [NAME]. In absence of treatment orders, the licensed nurse will notify physician to obtain treatment orders. Treatments will be documented on the Treatment Administration Record or in the electronic health record.Review of the facility policy, titled Catheter Care, undated, showed, catheter care will be performed every shift and as needed by nursing personnel.Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-22 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespreadProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient dietary staff were trained and competent in recognizing and documenting appropriate food temperatures, appropriate chemical sanitation of the dishwasher, sanitizer bucket and three compartment sink, and providing meals at the established mealtimes for 1 of 1 kitchen. This failure placed residents at risk of food born illness and decreased quality of life.Findings included.Food TemperaturesFacility Policy Review of facility policy, titled, Food Safety Requirements undated showed, staff shall monitor food temperatures while holding for delivery to ensure proper hot and cold holding temperatures are maintained. Staff shall refer to the current FDA Food Code and facility policy for food temperatures as needed. Reheating - food that is cooked and cooled must be reheated so that all parts of the food reach an internal temperature of 165 FReview of facility policy titled Record of Food Temperatures, undated, included the following, Food temperatures will be checked on all items prepared in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food temperatures were taken and documented, failed to ensure foods were cooked and served at the appropriate temperatures, failed to ensure food was stored and prepared in a sanitary manner, failed to ensure chemical solutions and water temperatures were maintained and documented and failed to ensure staff utilized proper handwashing during meal preparation and serving in 1 of 1 kitchen. This failure placed residents at risk for food borne illness.Findings included.Food TemperaturesFacility Policy Review of facility policy, titled, Food Safety Requirements undated showed, staff shall monitor food temperatures while holding for delivery to ensure proper hot and cold holding temperatures are maintained. Staff shall refer to the current FDA Food Code and facility policy for food temperatures as needed. Reheating - food that is cooked and cooled must be reheated so that all parts of the food reach an internal temperature of 165 FReview of facility policy titled Record of Food Temperatures, undated,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-08-22 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — patternAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility Administration failed to ensure there was active and engaged oversight and a monitoring system in place to correct findings from an internal audit related to treatment and service to prevent/heal pressure ulcers, food procurement, sufficient dietary support personnel and a sanitary kitchen. This failure placed residents at risk for development or worsening pressure ulcers, food borne illness and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of a facility document titled Mock Survey, dated 07/28/2025 and 07/29/2025 included the following:The facility failed to ensure a resident receives care consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure injuries and does not does not develop pressure injuries.skin checks not completed every 7 days.no measurements of this wound were taken other than the measurements taken upon admission.Infection Prevention/Control.follow enhanced barrier precautions for residents.standing/pooled water on the floor between the walk-in fridge and freezer.Towels on the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate care and services were provided to promote wound healing and prevent pressure ulcers from developing or worsening by assessing wounds timely, and following physicians' s orders timely for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1 and 4) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure placed residents at risk for worsening pressure ulcers, infections and medical complications.Findings included .Facility PolicyReview of facility policy, titled Skin Assessment, effective 03/03/2025 showed A full body, or head-to-toe assessment, will be conducted upon admission/readmission, weekly, and with any change of condition or after any newly identified pressure injuryReview of facility policy, titled Wound Treatment Management, undated, showed, Wound treatments will be provided in accordance with physician orders, including the cleansing method, type of dressing, and frequency of dressing change. Treatments will be documented on the Treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide prescribed nutritional supplements with meals for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 1 and 5) reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed residents at risk for decreased quality of life and weight loss. Findings included.Resident 1Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple sclerosis (neurological condition), cellulitis (skin infection) and a pressure ulcer to the left buttocks. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment dated [DATE], documented Resident 1 was cognitively intact and required supervision to eat. Review of Resident 1's physician's order, dated 06/25/2025, showed an order for regular diet, regular texture and thin consistency.Review of Resident 1's physician's order, dated 06/30/2025, showed an order for mighty shakes (high calorie, high protein nutritional supplement) for wounds with lunch and dinner.During observation on 08/06/2025 at 9:10 AM, showed Resident 1 with his…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow infection control practices for transmission-based precautions for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 6) reviewed for infection control. This failure placed residents at risk for spread of infection, health complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Facility PolicyReview of the facility policy, titled Transmission-based Precautions undated showed, Signage that includes instructions for use of specific PPE [personal protective equipment] will be placed in a conspicuous location outside the resident's room, wing, or facility-wide. Additionally, either the CDC category of transmission-based precautions (e.g., contact, droplet, or airborne) or instructions to see the nurse before entering will be included in the signage. Contact Precautions: The facility will have PPE readily available near the entrance of the resident's room and will don appropriate PPE before or upon entry into the environment of a resident on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-16 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain weights and failed to provide a recommended nutritional supplement for 1 of 3 (Resident 1) residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility's failure placed residents at risk for weight loss and decreased quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy, titled, Nutritional Management, undated, showed nutritional recommendations may be made by the dietician based on the resident's preferences, goals, clinical condition and other factors and followed up with the physician/practitioner for orders as per facility policy.Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including non-traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (bleeding in the space between the brain and the tissue covering the brain), cerebral aneurysm (weakness in the blood vessel in the brain that balloons and fills with blood), hemiplegia/hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body) and dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure accurate acquiring and receiving of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of 2 of 4 residents (6 and 9) reviewed. Failure to ensure ordered medications were received from pharmacy placed residents at risk for experiencing increased pain and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 6> Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, Resident 6 was cognitively intact, assessed with medically complex conditions including spinal stenosis and fractures of the thoracic vertebrae, received scheduled pain medication and was assessed with pain frequently. Review of the May 2025 Medication Administration Records (MARs) showed an order for Morphine Extended Release (ER), (narcotic pain medication) 30 milligrams to be administered every 12 hours for pain. Resident 6 did not receive three consecutive doses on 05/06/2025 at 8:00 PM, 05/07/2025 at 8:00 AM and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess gastrostomy tube (surgically placed tube through the abdominal wall into the stomach to provide nutrition) placement prior to initiating an enteral feeding (feeding through tube) and failed to follow the prescribed orders for hydration for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 7) reviewed for tube feeding management. This failure placed residents at risk for alteration in nutrition and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy, titled, Verifying Placement of Feeding Tube, undated, showed before beginning a feeding, flushing the tube, or administering a medication via the feeding tube, proper placement and functioning will be verified. The policy then went on to describe the various methods of confirming proper placement. <Resident 7> Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (serious condition that occurs when blood flow to the brain is disrupted),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient qualified nursing staff were available to provide care and services as evidenced by information provided in Resident/Surveyor interviews for 4 residents (Residents 1, 7, 71 & 12) interviewed, and 5 staff (Staff T, X, OO, N & PP) interviewed. The facility had insufficient staff to ensure residents received assistance with activities of daily living, restorative services and staff documentation. Additionally, the aides from the Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) department were removed from restorative nursing duties to cover direct care staff absences resulting in the RNPs not being done for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 42, 1 & 32) reviewed for RNP. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident Interviews> On 01/22/2025 at 11:18 AM, Resident 1 said it took a long time to get help. At 2:16 PM, Resident 7 said it took a long time to get help. Resident 7 said they had currently been waiting an hour and a half or close…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespreadEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses and nursing aides had the appropriate competencies/skill sets to provide nursing services that included appropriate transmission-based precaution (TBP) identification, staff correctly identifying which residents were on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP) and failed to implement correct usage of personal protective equipment (PPE) for residents on EBPs. The facility also failed to implement policies for orientation of agency/contracted staff, provide updated trainings for EBPs, ensure licensed staff were trained and competent in the management and monitoring of central venous catheters (centrally inserted access to veins), and to provide oversight of the Restorative Nursing Program (RNP). These failures placed residents at risk for facility acquired or healthcare-associated infections, related complications, unmet care needs and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Infection Control> Review of the facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions, undated, described that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0837 — widespreadEstablish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the governing body acted with disregard to the well-being of the residents of the facility by not ensuring adequate oversight and monitoring of appointed Administration and/or Directors of Nursing to ensure clinical systems were in place and followed and staffing levels were appropriate for the care required by the residents admitted to their facility. The governing body failed to ensure the facility was staffed sufficiently to meet the needs of the residents, so they received showers and other activities of daily living (ADLs) such as grooming and nailcare timely, that restorative programs were completed, and meals were delivered timely and accurately and that residents could access their personal funds. The governing body failed to ensure staff were adequately trained and had proper oversight for infection control practices, intravenous therapy and restorative nursing. The governing body's failure to provide oversight and support to ensure all policies and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-06 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespreadHave a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program self-identified deficiencies and failed to develop/implement effective plans of action to sustain plan of corrections for previous deficiencies. Failure to have an effectively functioning QAPI program that consistently self-identified deficient practices led to repeated deficiencies, a pattern of deficiencies, widespread deficiencies, and a pattern of actual harm that placed residents at repeated risk for unmet needs that could negatively impact their safety, quality of life and quality of care. Findings included . On 02/06/2025 at 10:05 AM, in a joint interview with Staff A, Administrator and Staff B, Director of Nursing Services, when asked if they had reviewed the [NAME] report (a report with previously cited deficiencies) to identify any repeat deficiencies that needed to be addressed, Staff A, Administrator, said no, they had only been in the facility since January 13th 2025, so was unable to speak to last year's survey. Staff A said she had not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to operationalize an effective Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) in accordance with facility policy, state, federal and or local infection control guidelines, regulations and practices when the facility failed to follow standard precautions (common sense practices to prevent the spread of infection in healthcare), enhanced barrier precautions (a set of infection control measures that use gowns and gloves to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) and transmission based precautions (used when someone has confirmed or suspected infections) related to lack of prompt isolation and use of precautions when several residents and staff had vomiting and diarrhea and a suspected gastrointestinal outbreak. The facility also failed to ensure the consitent hand hygiene, personal protective equipment (PPE) use and or cross contamination (the unintentional transfer of harmful bacteria, viruses, or allergens from one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address, respond to and/or resolve concerns and/or suggestions brought forward by the resident council (RC) for 3 of 3 months (October, November and December 2024) of RC minutes reviewed. These failures resulted in the same unresolved/unaddressed concerns being brought forward for consecutive months without resolution, and resulted in RC members feeling frustrated, unheard and powerless to affect the care they receive and/or their environment. Findings included . Review of the facility's Resident Council policy, dated 2024, showed the purpose of RC was to provide a forum for residents and families to have input in the operation of the facility; to discuss concerns and make suggestions for improvement; and consensus building and improving communication between residents and staff. The council was encouraged to elect a president to act as a liaison and facilitate communication between the RC and the designated staff person chosen by the RC. A Resident Council Response Form would be utilized to track issues and their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — patternHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with personal funds/resident trust accounts had ready access to their accounts during evenings and weekends for 12 of 12 residents reviewed for person funds accounts. This failure placed residents at risk of not having access to their accounts during non-banking hours, a decreased sense of autonomy and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly minimum data set, an assessment tool, dated 01/08/2025 documented the resident was cognitively intact. On 01/23/2025 at 9:33 AM, Resident 4 said they could not withdraw money from their account on the weekends. On 01/28/2025 at 12:24 PM, Staff K, Business Office Manager said residents could not withdraw money from their accounts after hours or on the weekends until a couple of weeks ago. Now if a resident wants to withdraw money the nurse will contact the administrator, and she will come in and help the residents make a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure quarterly personal fund statements were provided to residents with personal fund accounts for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 4, 32, and 5) reviewed for personal fund accounts. This failure placed residents at risk of not having an accurate accounting of their personal funds held in trust by the facility. Findings included . Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly minimum data set, an assessment tool, dated 01/08/2025 documented the resident was cognitively intact. On 01/23/2025 at 9:33 AM, Resident 4 said they did not receive statements from their personal funds account, and would like a statement every month. On 01/28/2025 at 12:24 PM, Staff K, Business Office Manager said they were not sure if the residents received their statements before they started working in October 2024, but they would be receiving them now. Staff K showed a printed pile of statements sitting on the desk and said they would be distributing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean and comfortable homelike environment for 4 of 4 Wings (A Wing, B Wing, C Wing and D Wing) observed. The failure to ensure doorways were free from gouges, blue decorative coverings over resident doors were secured to doors, light fixtures and resident medical equipment and shower rooms were clean and in good condition, left residents at risk for a diminished quality of life and a less than homelike environment. Findings included . On 01/22/2025 at 10:14 AM and 01/30/2025 at 10:02 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER]'s overhead light was out. On 01/28/2025 at 12:18 PM, the overhead light in front of Nurses station had 10 dead bugs. room [ROOM NUMBER]'s door blue decorative covering was peeling off the door and there were multiple gouges ranging from 3 & ½ inch to and 1-inch gouges in the paint exposing wood beneath. On A Wing, the last overhead light at the emergency exit was broken and a section was missing out of the light covering. room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a system in place that ensured grievances were initiated, logged, timely addressed, and resolved in response to residents' verbal conveyance of concerns during Resident Council for 3 of 3 months (October, November and December 2024) of resident council minutes reviewed. The failure to identify the initiate, log, investigate and timely resolve reported complaints/concerns, and inform residents of the findings and actions taken to correct the issues, placed residents at risk of feelings of frustration, unimportance, diminished self-worth, and quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's Resident and Family Grievance policy, dated 2024, showed the Grievance Officer was responsible for overseeing the grievance process; receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusion; leading any necessary investigations by the facility; maintaining confidentiality; and issuing written grievance decisions to residents. A resident or family member could voice a grievances in the following forums: a) Verbal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — patternEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain assessments, orders, consent, and/or develop a care plan for the use of potential restraints for 4 of 5 residents (Resident 4, 1, 65, and 6) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed residents at risk for potential injury, potential restraint, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy, titled, Proper Use of Bed Rails, undated, showed the facility was to assess the resident's risk from using bed rails, risk of entrapment, and risk of potential restraint. The policy listed alternatives that were to be attempted prior to installing or using bed rails. 1) Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool), dated 01/08/2025, documented the resident was cognitively intact. On 01/27/2025 at 7:29 AM, Resident 4 was sitting up in bed watching TV and their bed was against the wall. On 02/03/2025 at 2:21 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written transfer/discharge notice to the resident and/or their representative for 5 of 6 sampled resident (Residents 4, 11, 42, 57 & 58), failed to provide the Ombudsman notification for 6 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 3, 4, 11, 42, 57 & 58), and failed to update a resident representative for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 11) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the resident and/or their representative at risk for not having an opportunity to make informed decisions about transfers/discharges. Findings included . The facility policy titled, Transfer and Discharge, dated 2023, documented the facility's transfer/discharge notice would be provided to the resident and the resident's representative in a language and manner in which they could understand. The notice would include all of the following at the time it is provided that facility would maintain evidence that the notice was sent to the Ombudsman.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written bed hold notices at the time of transfer to the hospital for 4 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 4, 11, 42 & 57) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed while in the hospital. Findings included . The facility policy, titled, Bed hold Notice Upon Transfer, dated 2023, documented, 1. Before a resident is transferred to the house or goes on therapeutic leave, the facility will provide to the resident and/or the resident representative written information that specifies . 2. In the event of an emergency transfer of a resident, the facility will provide within 24 hours written notice of the facility's bed hold policies, as stipulated in the State's plan . 5. The facility will keep a signed and dated copy of the bed-hold notice information given to the resident and/or resident representative in the resident's file. 1) Resident 4 was admitted to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS) were complete and accurate for 9 of 23 sampled residents (Residents 27, 11, 12, 42, 1, 65, 16, 32 & 57). This failure placed the residents at risk of unmet and unidentified care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the October 2024 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI, a manual that provides instruction on how to accurately code a MDS assessment) showed the following criteria must be met to code restorative services on the MDS: a) Measurable and objective interventions must be documented in the care plan. b) Evidence of periodic evaluation by the licensed nurse must be present in the resident's medical record, which should include reassessment of progress, goal, and duration/frequency of the program(s). c) Range of motion (ROM) exercise programs must be individualized to the resident's needs, planned, monitored, evaluated and documented in the resident's medical record. 1)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise a comprehensive plan of care to include resident specific interventions for 7 of 23 sampled residents (Residents 65, 4, 6, 11, 27, 12 and 61) reviewed for care plans. The failure to establish care plans that were individualized, accurately reflected assessed care needs and provided direction to staff, placed residents at risk to receive inappropriate and inadequate care to meet their individualized needs. Findings included . 1) Resident 65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting left non-dominant side. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS/an assessment tool), dated 12/30/2024, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. On 01/27/2025 at 7:34 AM, Resident 65 was in bed and appeared asleep. The bed was observed against the wall and window. On 02/03/2025 at 2:23 PM, Resident 65 was sitting up in bed watching TV. Their bed was observed against the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans were consistently reviewed and revised to meet residents' current needs for 7 of 23 sampled residents (Residents 65, 27, 58, 51, 7, 18 & 32) reviewed for care plans. This failure to revise care plans placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . 1) Resident 65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side. The quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and was on a pain medication regimen and the resident reported they had not had pain or hurting in the last 5 days. A review of Resident 65's care plan listed a focused intervention initiated on 09/27/2024 that said they have a history of chronic sores in their mouth making it painful to chew their food and they have an oral suspension for pain control. On 01/30/2025 at 12:42 PM Staff B, Director of Nursing (DNS), said I don't see that Resident 65 is on an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4) Resident 55 had an order for lisinipril (blood pressure medication) daily, with direction to hold the medication for a systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than 100 or a pulse (P) less than 60. Review of the January 2025 MARs showed on the following dates facility nurses failed to hold the medication as ordered: - 01/13/2025- SBP 98; P 58 - 01/18/2025- P 58 A 01/09/2025 order for hydrochlorothiazide (hctz, a diuretic) daily, with direction to hold the medication for a SBP less than 100 or P less than 60. Review of the January 2025 MARs showed on the following dates facility nurses failed to hold the medication as ordered: - 01/09/2025- SBP 98; P 43 - 01/13/2025- SBP 97; P 58 - 01/18/2025- P 58 On 02/03/2025 at 2:18 PM, Staff C, Resident Care Manager (RCM), said on the above referenced occasions facility nurses administered the hctz and lisinipril outside of the physician ordered parameters, when the medications should have been held. 5) Resident 42 had a 01/05/2025 order for oxygen (O2) at two liters per minute…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for 3 of 8 residents (Residents 124, 32 and 27) reviewed for ADLs. The failure to assist dependent residents with oral care, shaving and meals, placed residents at risk for decreased nutritional intake, weight loss, poor hygiene, feelings of embarrassment, diminished self-worth and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 124 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. An Admit/Readmit Assessment, dated 01/24/2025, documented the resident required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. During a meeting with the Resident Council on 01/30/2025 at 10:00 AM, Resident 124 stated, I have not had my teeth brushed since I got here [7 days]. They reported a toothbrush was requested from staff on multiple occasions but had not been provided. On 01/30/2025 at 11:46 AM, Resident 124 opened their drawers and showed that there was not a toothbrush or toothpaste present in their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bowel management interventions were implemented for 3 of 8 residents (Residents 32, 65 & 3) reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed residents at risk for discomfort, further complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The facilities bowel protocol policy, undated, had the following instructions: FOR PATIENTS WITH CONSTIPATION; 1. lf no bowel movement (BM) within 72hrs, may give MOM (Mild of Magnesia, a laxative) 30cc (cubic centimeter) po (by mouth). 2. lf no results after MOM 30cc, may give Miralax (a laxative) 17gm (grams) po qd (daily) prn (as needed) or . 3. May add Bisacodyl (a laxative) 5mg (milligrams) i to ii (1 to 2) tablets po qd or suppository, NTE (not to exceed) 30mg in a 24hr period 4. May add Fleets (bowel stimulant) enema prn if constipation persists. 1) Resident 32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 1/8/2025, showed Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide restorative services at the frequency residents were assessed to require for 5 of 6 sample residents (1, 42, 61, 69, and 32) reviewed with restorative nursing programs (RNPs). These failures placed residents at risk for decrease in Range of Motion (ROM/movement of a joint through the range of motion with no effort from the patient), increased dependance on staff for care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facilty's undated Restorative Nursing Documentation policy, showed the need for restorative nursing services would be documented in the medical record, and indicated on the resident's plan of care. Documentation would include: The problem, need, or strength that was being addressed. A measurable goal with target date. The specific interventions/treatments to be provided. The frequency and duration of interventions/treatments. Restorative aide documentation would include the treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0694 — patternProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICC line, is a long, thin tube that's inserted through a vein in your arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart.), were assessed, maintained and monitored in accordance with professional standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 55 & 12) reviewed for intravenous (IV) therapy. The failure to ensure IV orders included: the type and location of IV access, the method of delivery, the infusion rate and duration, monitoring of the insertion site, flush orders, changes of needleless injection caps, and initial and weekly external catheter measurements, placed residents at risk for loss of vascular access, infection, and other potential complications and negative outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's undated Care and Maintenance of Central Venous Catheter policy, showed nurses would: a) Document the indication for use, insertion date, and type of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — patternEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure freedom from unnecessary medications for 4 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 1, 32, 27, and 42) when reviewed for unnecessary medications. The failure to assess, monitor, and evaluate the need for medications ongoing use, and administration of medications without clinical indication resulted in residents receiving unnecessary medications and placed them at risk of experiencing avoidable adverse side affects to medications, and other potential negative health outcomes. Findings included . 1) Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a cerebral infarction (stroke/a condition where blood flow to the brain is interrupted, causing brain tissue to die) affecting their right dominant side. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS, an assesment tool) dated 01/02/2025, documented the resident was cognitively intact and they reported no pain or hurting at any time in the previous five days. A review of the electronic medical record (EHR) showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents receiving psychotropic (used for treating mental health conditions) medications had specific target behaviors identified for there use, behavior and adverse side effect monitoring were in place, non-pharmacological (non-medication) interventions were identified and documented, informed consent was obtained prior to administering the medication, and resident specific care plans and interventions were developed and implemented for 4 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 12, 27, 3, & 40) reviewed for unnecessary medications. These failures detracted from staffs' ability to monitor the effectiveness and need for continued use of psychotropic medications and placed residents at risk of medication complications, unidentified adverse effects, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 12 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication storage room and medication carts were free from expired medication for 1 of 1 medication rooms (A and B Medication Nursing Station Room) and 2 of 2 medication storage carts (C Wing Cart & B Wing Cart) reviewed for medication storage and labeling. The facility failed to ensure that medications of different routes were safely stored in medication carts, that medication was appropriately labeled, that medication was not stored with possible items of contamination, and that controlled substances were appropriately stored, recorded, and wasted in a timely manner. The facility also failed to ensure that medication was stored inside the medication carts or with nursing present, for 1 of 3 medication carts (A Wing Cart) reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving expired medications, taking unattended medication, cross contamination, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <A and B Medication Nursing Station Room> During an observation and interview on 01/24/2025…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — patternEnsure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were prescribed therapeutic diets (as ordered by a physician or a dietician) received the correct foods/drinks that would fulfill the unique properties of each diet. This failure placed residents at risk for nutritional compromise and related negative health outcomes. On 01/28/2025 at 12:08 PM, staff began to plate the noon meal. The main meal consisted of roasted pork, cooked spinach, stuffing with apples, rolls, and pumpkin pie. Alternatives to the main meal were cold sandwiches, grilled cheese sandwiches, salads, and chicken noodle or tomato soup. Each plate was dished up the same way with the same food, unless the ticket said there was an allergy or a dislike. At 12:18 PM, a plate of food was placed on a tray with a ticket that said 'controlled carbohydrates.' Another plate of food was set on a tray with a ticket that said 'low calorie.' At 12:19 PM, Staff W, Cook, said the only therapeutic diet they served was Renal (for residents with kidney issues). They did not know what the other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-06 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's binding arbitration agreements (legal document that required the use of a third party to resolve disputes) included necessary wording of resident rights, and failed to explain to residents what a binding arbitration agreement was in a manner to allow them to understand, for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 53 and 18) reviewed for binding arbitration agreements. This failure placed residents at risk for legal complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The facility's blank Arbitration Agreement was reviewed on 01/27/2025 and found to be missing wording that: 1. The resident or their representative had the right to communicate with federal, state, or local officials such as federal or state surveyors, other federal or state health department employees and representative of the State Long Term Care Ombudsman 2. That a neutral arbitrator would be agreed upon by both parties 3. That the selection of a venue…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-02-06 · tag F0868 — patternHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee that included the Infection Preventionist (IP) and the Medical Director or his/her designee, to conduct required Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) and QAA activities. This failure detracted from the effectiveness of the QAA committee and placed residents at risk for quality deficiencies, adverse events, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . On 02/06/2025 at 10:05 AM, in a joint interview with Staff A, Administrator and Staff B, Director of Nursing Services, Staff A reviewed the QAPI/QAA required attendees for the past year of QAPI/QAA meetings. QAPI meeting attendance sheet documented: May 24th, 2024: No IP in attendance. August 29th, 2024: No IP or Medical Director in attendance. September 11th, 2024: No IP or Medical Director in attendance. December 20th, 2024: No IP in attendance. Staff A, Administrator, said they had only been in the facility since January 13th, 2025, so was unable to speak to last year's QAPI/QAA attendees.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide privacy for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for dignity. This failure placed residents at risk for feelings of embarrassment, diminished self-worth, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The quarterly minimum data set, an assessment tool, dated 01/2/2025 documented the resident was cognitively intact and needed substantial to maximal assistance with showers and bathing. On 01/23/2025 at 10:23 AM, Resident 1 was observed being transported down the hallway in a shower chair with blankets draped over their abdomen only, exposing their left side and buttocks. On 01/23/2025 at 10:45 AM, Staff X, Certified Nursing Assistant, was asked about transporting Resident 1 down the hallway after their shower and Staff X said she did not see their bottom exposed. On 01/30/2025 at 12:32 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing said her expectation was that residents be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer and/or honor bathing choices for 3 of 8 residents (Residents 124, 42 and 51) reviewed for choices. The failure to promote and facilitate resident choice related to type and frequency of bathing, placed residents at risk for poor hygiene, feelings of powerlessness, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 124 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In an interview on 02/05/2025 at 1:08 PM, the resident said staff had informed them that their shower days were Wednesdays and Saturdays, but reported staff didn't always show up. Resident 12 said they had only been provided one shower since admission. An activities of daily living (ADL) care plan, initiated 01/24/2025, documented Resident 124 required extensive assistance bathing, and would be showered on Wednesdays and Saturdays on evening shift. Review of the January and February 2025 bathing records showed there was no documentation to show the resident had been offered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the transfer of funds, from a resident trust account, was completed within 30 days following their discharge for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 177) reviewed for resident trust. This failure placed the resident and/or their representatives at risk for loss of funds and the interest accumulated. Findings included . A review of the electronic medical record showed Resident 177 deceased on [DATE] and a review of their account showed it contained a balance of $314.35. On [DATE] at 12:24 PM, Staff K, Business Office Manager confirmed Resident 177's account had not been closed within 30 days. On [DATE] at 12:43 PM, Staff A, Administrator said she was aware that Resident 177's account had not been closed and they had contacted the Department of Social and Health Services to close out the account properly. She said the expectation was that the accounts be closed within 30 days moving forward. Reference WAC 388-97-0340 .
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure residents' medical information was maintained in a manner to ensure privacy and confidentiality when staff failed to properly secure medical records for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 60) reviewed for privacy and confidentiality. These failures placed residents at risk for loss of confidential medical information and a diminished quality of life. Finding included . On 01/29/2025 at 2:03 PM, D Wing Medication cart had a laptop open and unsecured, displaying Resident 60's personal medical information. Seven feet away stood Staff L, Infection Preventionist, who was talking to contractor staff. Staff L then walked away a minute later. At 2:05 PM, Staff D, Resident Care Manager (RCM), walked past the open computer. At 2:07 PM, Staff M, Lead Restorative Nursing Assistant (RNA) walked past the open compute with a resident. At 2:08 PM, Staff N, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), walked past open computer. At 2:09 PM, Staff M, Lead RNA and Staff N, CNA walked by open computer. At 2:14 PM, Staff D, RCM, observed the open…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the documentation during transfer or discharge of the residents was complete with appropriate information provided to the receiving health care institution or provider, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed (Resident 11) for closed records. This failure placed residents at risk of unidentified and unmet medical needs, and a diminished qualify of life. Findings included . Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD, a mental health condition triggered by an extremely stressful or terrifying event), depression, and anxiety. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed Resident 11 was transferred and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. The EHR showed it was a facility initiated discharge, as the facility called the police to transfer Resident 11 to the hospital for inappropriate behaviors. Review of the EHR showed the facility was missing documentation. The facility did not have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASRR) were complete and accurate for 2 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 11 & 12) reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed the residents at risk of unmet and unidentified care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD, a mental health condition triggered by an extremely stressful or terrifying event), depression, and anxiety. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed Resident 11 had a Level II PASRR uploaded in their record, dated 03/03/2023, and a Level I PASRR, dated 05/02/2024. Resident 11's Level II PASRR was completed in 2023 and only addressed their diagnosis of PTSD. Resident 11's Level I PASRR, completed 05/02/2024 prior to their admission, only had PTSD selected. Resident 11's diagnosis list was updated on admission, 05/02/2024, with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) Resident 61 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the 11/24/2024 Quarterly MDS showed the resident was cognitively intact, and identified that being around animals such as pets, keeping up on the news, and getting fresh air when the weather was nice were somewhat important to them, while listening to music they liked was Very important. On 01/22/2025 at 9:40 AM, 01/23/2025 at 10:19 AM, 01/27/2025 at 02/03/2025 at 9:57 AM and 10:26 AM, and 02/05/2025 at 10:57 AM, Resident 61 was observed lying in bed without their television on or music playing. An activity care plan, revised 11/12/2024, documented the following goals: will have opportunities to watch TV or listen to music and will socialize in a one-to-one setting with a volunteer/visitor/activity staff two to three times a week. The care plan did not address getting fresh air or being around animals. Review of the Kardex showed under Activities it was documented one to one visits with family, one to one visits with staff and watching television.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Podiatry (the treatment of feet and their ailments) care and services were provided for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 27) reviewed for foot care. This failure placed the resident at risk for further skin impairment, discomfort, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 61 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the 11/24/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), showed the resident was cognitively intact, and required substantial to maximal assistance with hygiene and lower body care. On 01/23/2025 at 9:40 AM, Resident 61's toenails were observed to long, yellow, thick and untrimmed. The second through fourth digits on the right foot and first, third and fifth digits on the left foot were starting to curve around the end of the resident's toes. At 10:35 AM, Resident 61 said that staff had not offered or provided toenail care since admission. The resident indicated they went to a podiatrist…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to consistently implement fall prevention interventions for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 27) reviewed for falls. This failure placed residents at risk of falling, injury, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia and anxiety. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 01/11/2025, showed Resident 27 had severe cognitive impairment, was receiving psychotropic medication (used for treating mental health conditions, can increase risk of falls), required staff assistance for using the restroom, and had a history of falls. Review of the Electronic Health Record showed that Resident 27's most recent fall was on 10/11/2024, which resulted in a broken nose. Review of Resident 27's fall and nutrition care plans, listed interventions that included: -Fall mat to the right side of bed to prevent injury -Keep call-light and things of interest within…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with indwelling catheters (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder through the urethra to drain urine) without a documented justification for use, were assessed for catheter removal as soon as possible, that catheter tubing properly positioned and secured to prevent trauma, and urology referrals were made when ordered for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 42) reviewed for urinary catheters. These failures placed residents at risk for unnecessary catheterization, urinary tract infections, decreased bladder tone, urethral erosion and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 42 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), showed the resident was cognitively intact, had an indwelling urinary catheter but no diagnoses of neurogenic bladder, obstructive uropathy, urinary retention or kidney disease. An alteration in elimination related to indwelling…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) Resident 42 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the 01/12/2025 Quarterly MDS showed the resident was cognitively intact, had a diagnosis of lung disease and required supplemental oxygen during the assessment period. Review of Resident 42's orders showed a 01/05/2025 order for O2 at 2 Liters/minute (how much oxygen flowed in per minute) via NC to maintain O2 saturation (SpO2) above 90%. On 01/22/2025 at 10:05 AM, Resident 42 was lying in bed receiving 02 at 1.5L/min via NC. The O2 tubing and humidifier bottle were undated, and the humidifier bottle was empty. On 01/23/2025 at 10:36 AM, Resident 42 was in bed receiving O2 via NC at 4L/min. The humidifier bottle and O2 tubing had been replaced and were dated 01/22/2025. 01/23/2025 at 11:40 AM, Staff L, Infection Preventionist, observed Resident 42 and confirmed they were receiving O2 via NC at 4L/min. Review of the January 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed the nurse signed that they administered Resident 42 O2 at 2L/min as ordered. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, plan, and implement interventions for the individual needs of 1 of 2 residents (Resident 57) reviewed for dialysis. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, rehospitalizations, and further medical complications. Findings included . The facility's Dialysis Policy, undated, stated the following, Residents receiving hemodialysis have a Plan of Care (POC) specific to meet their needs, which is developed by [facility] in conjunction with the dialysis center providing hemodialysis. It said the facility was responsible for completing/sending; and receiving back, the Dialysis Transfer Form which contained information about vitals, weights, medications, psychosocial changes/needs, and labs. In addition, the policy said the facility would provide ongoing monitoring and as needed interventions for the dialysis access site. Resident 57 initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], was hospitalized on [DATE], and was readmitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-06 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow up on pharmacy recommendations for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 65) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk for medical complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses including diabetes (a chronic metabolic disorder characterized by high blood sugar levels). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 12/30/2024, documented the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. A review of the monthly pharmacy review (MMR) for Resident 65, dated 11/30/2024, showed the physician agreed with the pharmacist's recommendation to discontinue the blood sugar checks four times a day. The physician ordered Resident 65's blood sugar to be checked weekly and an A1C (a blood test that measures the average blood sugar level over the previous 2-3 months) in three months. The MMR was signed by the physician on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of 5% or greater, with an error rate of 16% with errors observed for 2 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 69 and 1) reviewed for medication administration observation. This failure placed residents at risk for medical device complications, delay in medication, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy, titled Medication Administration via Enteral Tube, undated, showed staff were to administer each medication separately, not combined, and not add to a formula feed. The feeding tube was to be flushed with 15 milliliters (ml) of water after each medication. For medications substituted with pill form, they should have been crushed and mixed with water. 1) Resident 69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had a feeding tube (gastric tube, G-tube). Resident 69 had four medications to be given: 1. A liquid Multivitamin 15 ml via G-tube AM 2. A stool…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 10 sampled residents (Resident 12 & 51) received foods that accommodated the residents' preferences and allergies. This failure placed residents at risk for meal dissatisfaction, allergic reaction, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 01/23/2025 at 10:03AM, Resident 12 said they did not like the food, it often gets stuck going down. Resident 12 said they did not like milk or apple juice but continual get it on the meal tray. Resident 12's ordered diet was CCHO (Controlled Carbohydrate Diet), Regular texture, thin liquids. The electronic health records (EHR) documented Resident 12 disliked the following foods/beverages: Cottage cheese, milk, Acidic foods, apple juice, seafood, fish, wild rice, pickles, and onions. The EHR documented Resident 12 was lactose intolerant. On 01/31/2025 at 8:16 AM, Resident 12 was laying in bed, with breakfast meal tray…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolatedImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) for three of three months (October 2024, November 2024 and December 2023) reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for adverse outcomes associated with inappropriate and/or unnecessary use of antibiotics, including for Multi Drug Resistant Organisms (MDRO: germs that are resistant to many antibiotics), and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . On 02/05/2025 at 2:09 PM, when asked which residents should be included in the Antibiotic Line Listing (a list that tracks antibiotic use, patterns, or infection cases to track trends and identify inappropriate use of antibiotics) Staff L, Infection Preventionist, said any resident who was on antibiotics should be on the Antibiotic Line Listing. When Staff L was made aware that Resident 32, who had been taking antibiotics since 10/2023 but was not found on the 10/2024, 11/2024, or 12/2024 Antibiotic Line Listing, Staff L said she did not track indefinite antibiotics (antibiotics that are prescribed for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation of staff COVID 19 (an infectious respiratory disease caused by a virus) vaccination status. This failure placed residents at risk of contracting COVID 19, medical complications and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . On 01/28/2025 at 9:16 AM, when asked if there was documentation of staffs COVID-19 vaccination status, Staff L, Infection Preventionist (IP) and Registered Nurse said it's was not a requirement, it was not part their hiring process and it was not being done. On 01/29/2025 at 2:07 PM, when clarifying that keeping documentation of staff COVID-19 vaccination was a requirement Staff L, IP, said, I was told that it was not a requirement, that it is not mandated. I was keeping a record when it was a mandated requirement. Staff L said, I don't yet have a staff list of vaccination status. No associated WAC .
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff followed the facility policy for safe use of dryers for 1 of 2 dryers (dryer 2) and the facility failed to provide the necessary monitoring and supervision for 3 of 4 residents (Resident 1, 3 and 4) with wandering behaviors reviewed for accidents, hazards, and supervision. These failures contributed to a fire in dryer 2 and Resident 1 eloping from the facility and placed resident at risk for injury and a diminished quality of care. Findings included . <Dryer Use> Review of the facility policy, titled laundry, dated 06/01/2024, showed laundry will be removed from washers and dryers promptly and will not be left in the machines overnight Review of counseling/disciplinary/termination notice for Laundry Attendant, Staff G, dated 10/07/2024 showed Staff G has been counseled on the lint traps not being clean out or documented that they'd been clean out and documented, you must clean out the lint traps every three hours and at the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure safe food preparation by documenting food temperatures for 1 of 1 kitchen. This failure placed residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings included . Review of the facility policy, titled Record of Food Temperatures, undated, included the following: - Food temperatures will be checked on all items prepared in the dietary department - Hot foods will be held at 135 degrees Fahrenheit or greater - Measure and record the temperatures for each food product and milk at all meals. Record temperature on temperature log On 11/27/2024 at 11:55 AM, Kitchen Staff, Staff F, was asked if they were responsible for taking food temperatures. Staff F said yes she completed food temperatures but doesn't write the temperatures down but can remember them and said temperature logs should be in the kitchen somewhere. At 12:05 PM, the Dietary Manager, Staff E, acknowledged during review of the food temperature logs that food temperatures drop after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accurate acquiring and receiving off all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of 3 of 4 residents (Resident 3, 5 and 6) reviewed for medications and pharmacy services. Failure to ensure ordered medications were received from the pharmacy placed residents at risk for pain and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 3> Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including vascular dementia (brain damage from impaired blood flow), osteoarthritis (bone inflammation) and pain. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS/an assessment tool), dated [DATE], the resident was cognitively impaired and received scheduled pain medication, as needed pain medication for pain and antipsychotic medications (medications that treat psychosis symptoms such as delusions, hallucinations or paranoia). Resident 3's physicians order, dated [DATE], showed an order for oxycodone (narcotic pain medication to treat pain)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-16 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review the facility failed to notify the resident's Power of Attorney (POA) of a change in condition for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 10) reviewed for notification of changes. This failure placed residents at risk for not having the opportunity to have family notified of changes in condition and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The facility policy titled, Notification of Changes, undated, showed the facility must inform the resident, consult with the resident's physician and/or notify the resident's family member or legal representative when there is a change requiring such notification .Circumstances requiring notification include .Significant change in the resident's physical, mental or psychological condition such as deterioration in health, mental or psychosocial status .Competent individuals .The facility must still contact the resident's physician and notify resident's representative . Resident 10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-16 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide condom catheter care for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 6) reviewed for condom catheter care. Findings included . Resident 6 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), Sepsis (life threatening response to infection) and diabetes. The resident had a history of a Penile Skin Graft and an Orchiectomy (surgical procedure where one or more testicles are removed). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 04/17/2024, showed the resident had no internal or external catheter or pressure ulcers. Review of the facility policy, titled Condom Catheter Care Policy, undated, showed it is the policy of this facility to ensure that condom catheters are applied appropriately, cared for and removed consistent with current standards of practice. Caring for these devices includes proper sizing and observation of the skin to ensure that signs of breakdown are not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0622 — isolatedNot transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure transfer discharge documentation was completed including physician's order and necessity for transfer for facility-initiated transfer/discharge for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for transfer/discharge. This failure placed residents at risk for un-met care needs and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of facility policy, undated, titled Transfer and Discharge (including AMA [Against Medical Advice], showed for non-emergency transfers or discharges initiated by the facility, they would document the reasons for the transfer or discharge in the resident's medical record, and in the case of necessity for the resident's welfare and when the resident's needs could not be met in the facility, they would document the specific resident needs that could not be met and what attempts the facility made to meet the those needs. They would document any danger to the health or safety of the resident or other resident or other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — patternHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure policies to promote smoking safety were established in accordance with state and local laws for 3 of 3 (Residents 1, 7 & 8) sampled residents reviewed for smoking. These failures placed residents, staff, and visitors at risk for ignition of combustible material. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Non-Smoking/Tobacco and Marijuana Free Notice and Agreement, undated, showed smoking cigarettes, marijuana, and the use of any/all tobacco products as well as electronic cigarettes and vaping devices anywhere on the premises by residents was strictly prohibited. All residents admitted after 10/15/2021 were to smoke off facility premises under direct supervision of family, guardian, power of attorney (POA) or an individual acting as responsible party. All smoking materials were to be held outside by family, guardian, POA or the responsible party. <Resident 1> Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an allegation of financial exploitation was reported timely for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for abuse. This failure placed residents at risk for abuse, neglect and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety, and major depressive disorder. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 01/10/2024, showed the resident was cognitively impaired, did not exhibit behaviors, and was frequently incontinent of bladder and bowel during the look back/review period. Review of the facility accident and incident log, dated 1/3/2024 through 3/31/2024 showed no documentation of an unusual incident or event related to misappropriation of resident funds. Review of a Social Services progress note for Resident 2, dated 03/28/2024, showed Staff C, Social Services Director (SSD), submitted a report to a state agency related to a potential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolatedProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and implement interventions to address dementia care needs for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 4) reviewed for dementia care. This failure placed residents at risk for diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy, titled Dementia Care, dated 2023, documented care and services will be person-centered .individualized, non-pharmacological approaches to care will be utilized, to include meaningful activities .if needed, the environment will be modified to accommodate individual resident care needs . <Resident Information> <Resident 4> Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with psychotic disturbance and anxiety disorder. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 02/13/2024, showed the resident was cognitively impaired, exhibited physical behaviors towards others during the look back/review period and exhibited wandering behaviors. <Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — patternHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident choices related to frequency of bathing for 3 of 7 residents (Residents 5, 64 & 37) reviewed for choices related to bathing. This failure placed residents at risk for feelings of un-cleanliness, powerlessness and diminished a quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 5 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the 12/26/2023 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) showed the resident was cognitively intact and choices related to bathing were very important. On 03/05/2024 at 10:31 AM, Resident 5 said they did not get to choose their bathing frequency and stated, [staff] assign you one shower per week. My doctor called and questioned them about bathing because I was having such itching problems only being bathed once per week. Now I am supposed to get two per week. Review of Resident 5's bathing flowsheet for February and March 2024 showed the resident was to be bathed twice weekly on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable and homelike environment in 1 of 1 dining rooms (Main Dining) review for homelike environment, 2 of 10 resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER] & 15) observed for cleanliness and 1 of 9 resident rooms observed for odors. This failure placed residents at risk of feeling unclean, undignified, and diminished self-worth and/or quality of life. Findings included . <Dining> Observation of the lunch meal in the main dining room on 03/04/2024, showed the dining room tables had no tablecloths or centerpieces. Staff served all 18 residents in the dining room their meals on cafeteria style trays, rather than placing residents' plates and beverages directly on the table. Similar observations were made on 03/06/2024 at 1:47 PM and on 03/08/2024 at 12:03 PM. On 03/08/2024 at 2:12 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing, said it was the expectation that staff remove resident meals from the trays and place them directly on the tables in the dining room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 5 of 24 residents (Residents 56, 90, 292, 12 & 64) reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, were completed accurately to reflect the resident's condition. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet needs. Findings included . 1) Resident 56 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The admission MDS, dated [DATE], the resident had a diagnosis of anxiety disorder and did not receive antipsychotic medications. Review of October 2023 Medication Administration Records (MARs) showed the resident received the antipsychotic medication, Abilify, as an added medication to treat depression. In an interview on 03/06/2024 at 1:50 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services (DNS), confirmed the 10/10/2023 MDS did not, but should have reflected the use of an antipsychotic. According to the 01/14/2024 Quarterly MDS, the resident had no falls since admission/entry or reentry or the prior assessment. In an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-11 · tag F0644 — patternCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level 2 comprehensive evaluations (the process to determine what types of mental health services are required after a Level 1 PASRR determined services were necessary) were obtained and/or implemented and incorporated into the Care Plan (CP) for 5 of 6 residents (Residents 12, 11, 56, 5 & 47) reviewed for PASRRs. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving necessary mental health care and services. Findings included . 1) Resident 12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to a Level 1 PASRR, dated 09/11/2023, Resident 12 had a Serious Mental Illness (SMI) of schizophrenic disorder and Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome (PTSD). A second PASRR Level 1, dated 10/27/2023, showed facility staff identified the resident with mood disorder, anxiety disorders, and an Intellectual Disability and referred for a Level 2 evaluation. Record review on 03/08/2024 showed no indication a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-11 · tag F0655 — patternCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents and/or their representatives with a summary of the baseline care plan for 3 of 3 residents (90, 66 & 292) reviewed for newly admitted residents. Failure to provide baseline care plans placed residents at risk to be uninformed of their healthcare goals, treatments, and services. Findings included . 1) Resident 90 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and according to the 02/13/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) had multiple medically complex diagnoses including cancer, sepsis and malnutrition. In an interview on 03/05/2024 at 8:15 AM, the resident said he did not recall receiving a copy of the baseline care plan. Record review showed no indication the resident and/or representative received a written summary of the baseline care plan he/she was able to understand. 2) Resident 66 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] following a hospitalization. In an interview on 03/05/2024 at 10:03 AM, Resident 66 indicated they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review the facility failed to review and revise care plans for 6 of 24 residents (Residents 56, 12, 66, 21, 5 & 37) reviewed for care plans. The failure to review and revise care plans, by the interdisciplinary team, after each assessment, placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 56 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple medically and psychologically complex diagnoses. Care Plan (CP) documents showed Resident 12 had an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Self-Care-Performance deficit related to anxiety. Resident 56's Pre-admission Screening Record Review (PASRR) Level 2, dated 12/18/2023, documented the resident had experienced both sexual and personal trauma. Review of the CP documents showed no indication of these issues. The 12/18/2023 PASRR Level 2 made recommendations for Resident 12 to have Mental Health (MH) Counseling and psychiatry medication management, which was not reflected in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for 8 of 24 residents (Residents 84, 11, 56, 90, 79, 21, 5 & 8) reviewed. The failure of nursing staff to obtain, follow or clarify physicians' orders when indicated, and to document for only those tasks completed, placed residents at risk for medication errors, delayed treatment, and other adverse outcomes. Findings included . 1) Review of Resident 84's physician's orders showed orders for Cozaar and metoprolol (blood pressure medications) with instruction to hold the medication if the Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) was less than 110. Review of the March 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed on 03/01/2024 and 03/06/2024 the SBP was less than 110, but nursing staff administered both the Cozaar and metoprolol instead of holding the medications as ordered. Observation of medication pass on 03/07/2024 at 8:01 AM, showed Staff I, Licensed Practical Nurse, administer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain residents' highest practicable level of well-being for 4 of 7 residents (Residents 21, 5, 37 & 47) reviewed for bowel management and 1 of 1 resident (Resident 5) reviewed for a fluid restriction. The failure to initiate bowel care in accordance with physician's orders and to accurately document, total, and assess fluid intake placed residents at risk for fluid volume overload, pain/discomfort, and other health complications. Findings included . <Bowel Management> Review of the facility's For Patients with Constipation policy, dated 11/05/2023, showed if a resident went 72 hours (3 days) without a bowel movement (BM), the nurse may administer the following: a) If 72 hours without a BM may administer Milk of Magnesia (MOM) 30 milliliters. b) If no results after MOM, may administer Miralax 17 grams. c) May administer bisacodyl one to two tabs or a suppository. d) May administer a Fleets enema if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accurate acquiring and receiving off all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of 3 of 4 residents (Resident 292, 90 & 79) reviewed. Failure to ensure ordered medications were received from the pharmacy placed residents at risk for pain and nutritional deficit. Findings included . 1) Resident 292 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, the resident was cognitively intact, assessed with medically complex conditions and received as needed pain medication for pain that occasionally interfered with therapy and day to day activities. The resident rated their pain as a 5 on a scale of 1-10. Observation during medication pass on 03/05/2024 at 8:14 AM showed Resident 292 requested an as needed (PRN) narcotic pain medication. Resident 292 said he hadn't received the pain medication since 03/03/2024 and the Tylenol being administered in it's place was not effective.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — patternImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 4 of 5 residents (Resident 11, 56, 21 & 34) reviewed for unnecessary medications were free from unnecessary psychotropic (affect mind, emotions and/or behaviors) medications related to the failure to: adequately monitor, ensure adequate indications for use, or identify non-pharmacological (non-drug) interventions for behaviors. These failures placed residents at risk to receive unnecessary medications and/or adverse side effects. Findings included . 1) Resident 11 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident's Medicare five day/ admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated 01/20/2024, showed the resident had an anxiety disorder, but no depression. The associated Care Area Assessment (CAA) documented the resident received routine Zoloft (an antidepressant) for depression. Review of Resident 11's February and March 2024 Medication Administration Records (MARs) showed staff monitored for adverse side effects of the Zoloft but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 percent when 2 of 4 nurses (Staff E and G) failed to properly administer 4 of 30 medications for 3 of 9 sampled residents (Resident 69, 292 & 53) observed during medication pass resulting in a medication error rate of 13.3 percent. These failures placed residents at risk to not receive the therapeutic effects of medications prescribed by the physician. Findings included . 1) Observation of medication pass on 03/06/2024 at 12:06 PM showed Staff E, Registered Nurse (RN), prepare a Lispro insulin KwickPen (Diabetic Medication) for administration to Resident 69. Staff E failed to prime the insulin pen prior to dialing up the 4 units of insulin ordered for Resident 69. According to manufacturer directions, prior to insulin injections, the pen should be primed before each injection and directs, Priming your Pen means removing the air from the Needle and Cartridge that may collect during normal use and ensures that the Pen is working correctly. If you do not prime before…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure insulin was dated when opened, drugs and biologicals were removed when expired, medications were stored at proper temperatures, and medication carts and rooms were secured, in accordance with currently accepted professional standards in 2 of 4 medication carts and 1 of 2 medication rooms reviewed. The facility failed to ensure medications were secured in locked storage for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 90 and 56) observed with medications in their rooms. This placed residents at risk to receive expired medications and biologicals. Findings included . UNSECURED MEDICATIONS D wing Medication Cart Observations on 03/05/24 at 8:59 AM showed the D Wing Medication cart was observed unlocked. Staff [NAME] Licensed Practical Nurse(LPN) came out of room [ROOM NUMBER] grabbed something out of the cart and went back into room [ROOM NUMBER] leaving the D wing Medication Cart unlocked again. Unlocked A/B Hall Medication Room Observations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — patternProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt dental services were provided for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 66, 5 & 21) reviewed for dental services. This failure placed residents at risk for difficulty chewing, pain discomfort due to unmet dental needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 66 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the 01/18/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, and the 02/13/2024 Medicare 5 Day MDS Resident 66 was identified Resident 66 complained of difficulty or discomfort with chewing. In an interview on 03/05/2024 at 9:51 AM, Resident 66 stated he had problems chewing and needed dentures. Observation at this time showed the resident had tooth stubs/broken carious teeth on both the top and bottom gumline. In an interview on 03/07/2024 at 3:19 PM, Resident 66 stated he had difficulty chewing food secondary to his broken/missing teeth. He stated he wanted to see a dentist. Record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-11 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to provide appetizing and palatable food to residents. This failure placed residents at risk for weight loss, inadequate nutrition and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . RESIDENT INTERVIEWS 1. On 03/04/2024 at 11:50 AM, Resident 47 said the food was cold and did not taste good. 2. On 03/04/2024 at 12:10 PM, Resident 46 said the food was cold by the time it got to them and it was not savory like the instant potatoes. 3. On 03/04/2024 at 12:20 PM, Resident 90 said the food was cold and not good. 4. On 03/04/2024 at 1:31 PM, Resident 56 said the food didn't look good or taste appetizing, and was cold sometimes. Resident 56 also said it didn't look good and sometimes they couldn't tell what it was. 5. On 03/05/2024 at 9:59 AM, Resident 66 said the food was over cooked; they had fried eggs, but the egg was hard cooked. 6. On 03/05/2024 at 11:07 AM, Resident 64 said the food was cold when they got it. RESIDENT COUNCIL MINUTES November 2023 minutes documented, Room services food cold and milk warm.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided meal service according to the facility's posted meal service schedule for 2 of 2 (Lunch meals on 03/04/2024 and 03/06/2024) reviewed for meal service. These failures placed residents at risk for not receiving their meals as scheduled, medical complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Facility posted mealtimes as followed: Breakfast: 7:30 AM-8:30 AM, Lunch: 11:30 AM-12:30 PM and Dinner 4:30 PM-5:30 PM On 03/04/2024 at 12:41 PM, B Wing staff started passing out meal trays, 11 minutes after the end of mealtime. At 12:46 PM, D Wing meal cart arrived on the hall, 16 minutes after the end of mealtime. On 03/06/2024 at 12:24 PM, Staff A, Administrator, came into the kitchen inquiring why lunch meal was behind schedule and then left the kitchen. At 12:37 PM, Staff A, returned to the kitchen, again inquiring about the meal being behind schedule. At 12:52 PM, kitchen staff started plating residents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen followed proper safe food preparation/storage for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety. The facility failed to discard rusted and dented dry food storage cans, identify expiration dates on dry food storage cans, maintain temperature logs for 3 of 3 refrigerators/freezers, and maintain walk in freezer in appropriate working conditions. These failures contributed to an unsanitary kitchen environment and placed residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings included . <Food Storage> On 03/04/2024 at 9:19 AM, during Initial Kitchen tour observation, 4 6-pound cans of stewed tomatoes were observed to be covered in rust (on the top of the can). Two of 4 stewed tomatoes cans were observed with large dents on the top and side of the cans. None of the stewed tomatoes had expiration dates. At 9:36 AM, when asked about the expiration dates on the stewed tomatoes, Staff T, Cook, said the cans were in the box and the expiration date was on the box. Staff T said the cans were removed from the box.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infections control standards were followed related to use of required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) with residents on Transmission Based Precautions (TBP), use of barriers and sanitization of glucometers, prevention of cross-contamination during administration of eye drops and handling of laundry to prevent spread of infection. These failures paced residents at risk of spreading and/or contracting infectious diseases. Findings included . LAUNDRY SERVICES On [DATE] at 1:43 PM, the door between the dirty laundry staging room (Room where contaminated linen is brought to be separated) and the main laundry area was propped open. Additionally, observation of the exhaust vent showed it was heavily soiled with brown stringy debris and was non-operational. On [DATE] at 1:48 PM, Staff Z, Environmental Services Director, said the door between the dirty laundry staging room and the main laundry area should remain closed except when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a manner that promoted resident dignity for 3 of 18 residents (Residents 11, 57 & 9) observed in the dining room. The facility also failed to respect and value residents' private space by knocking and/or announcing themselves prior to entering a resident's room for 4 of 9 rooms (Rooms 32, 33, 29 & 31) reviewed for dignity. These failures placed residents at risk for being treated with a lack of dignity and respect and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Dinning Observation> 1) Resident 57 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the 02/09/2024 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) showed the resident had severe cognitive impairment and a diagnoses including dementia. On 03/04/2024 at 11:27 AM, during lunch meal service, Staff V, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), danced up to Resident 57's wheelchair and stated, hey girl and continued to dance. An 'improving mental health and enhancing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address the required documentation for advanced directives (AD) for 1 of 2 residents (67) reviewed for AD. This failure placed residents at risk of losing their right to have their preferences/decisions regarding end-of-life care followed. Findings included . Resident 67 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes, hypertension, lower extremity ulcers and congestive heart failure. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 02/05/2024, indicated the resident had moderately impaired cognition. A review of Resident 67's electronic health records showed no documentation of an AD. A record review of Resident 67's care plan showed no documentation of an AD. A review of the Care Conference notes on 08/15/2023, said the resident did not want to fill out advance care directives at that time. On 03/07/2024 at 8:40 AM Staff D, Social Services Director, said they should have followed up again with Resident 67 and asked them…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advanced Beneficiary Notices (ABN: a notification that provides an estimated cost of continuing services which may no longer be covered by Medicare. Beneficiaries may choose to continue the services but may be financially liable) was completed as required for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 59) reviewed for Beneficiary Notification. This failure placed residents at risk of not being allowed to make informed choices about further treatment or services as required by the Medicare Program and of not being informed of their appeal rights prior to the end of Medicare covered services. Findings included . Review of Resident 59's SNF ABN, completed on 03/11/2024, showed, Question 1: Was an SNF ABN, form CMS-10055 provided to the resident? was left blank. This form did not show a check mark for any of the three available options. On 03/11/2024 at 2:48 PM, Staff A, Administrator (with Staff C, Chief Executive Officer, present for interview), said they could not find the SNF ABN for Resident 59…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate, log, promptly respond to and resolve grievances for 2 of 6 residents (Residents 21 & 46) reviewed for missing property. The failure to initiate, log, and promptly address resident grievances prevented staff from identifying care trends and ensuring resident concerns were timely and effectively addressed. This placed residents at risk of feelings of frustration, unimportance, decreased self-worth and quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated Resident and Family Grievances policy, showed the facility would make prompt efforts to resolve grievances. Staff members taking a grievance would record the nature and specifics of the grievance on the designated grievance form or assist the resident or family member to complete the form and forward it to the grievance official as soon as practicable. The grievance official would take steps to resolve the grievance, and record information about the grievance, and actions taken, on the grievance form. Prompt efforts included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or the resident's representative a written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy, at the time of transfer or within 24 hours, for 2 of 6 residents (Residents 66 & 56) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents and their representatives at risk of not being informed of their right to, and the cost of, holding the resident's bed while hospitalized . Findings included . According to the facility policy on Bed Hold Notice Upon Transfer (undated): 1. Before a resident is transferred to the hospital or goes on therapeutic leave, the facility will provide to the resident and/or the resident representative written information that specifies: a. The duration of the state bed-hold policy, if any, during which the resident is permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility. bathe reserve bed payment policy in the state plan policy, if any. cither facility policies regarding bed-hold periods to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessments accurately reflected residents' mental health conditions for 2 of 6 residents (Residents 11 & 21) reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed residents at risk for inappropriate placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health needs. Findings included . 1) Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 01/20/2024, the resident had multiple diagnoses which including anxiety disorder but no indication of depression. Resident 11's January Medication Administration Records (MARs), showed the resident was admitted to the facility with orders for the antidepressant, Zoloft, but with no associated diagnosis. A provider note, dated 01/30/2024, documented the resident was taking the Zoloft to treat depression. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) did not show…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for 2 of 6 residents (Residents 66 & 50) reviewed for ADL care for dependent residents. This failure to provide dependent residents with nail care and overall grooming placed them at risk for poor hygiene, embarrassment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 66 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and according to the 02/13/2024 Medicare 5 Day Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, Resident 66 was identified with diagnoses including acute respiratory failure, peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, and multiple chronic ulcers of the lower extremity. This MDS also indicated the resident had bilateral lower extremity range of motion impairment. On 03/04/2024 at 2:20 PM and 03/05/2024 at 10:03 AM, Resident 66 was observed with long, jagged fingernails with dark brown debris under the nails. In an interview on 03/05/2024 at 10:03 AM, Resident 66…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow pressure ulcer orders and prevention measures for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 50) reviewed for pressure injuries. This failure placed residents at risk for new and worsening pressure injuries, pain, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The annual Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 02/15/2024, documented Resident 50 was cognitively intact. Resident 50 admitted to the facility with one Stage 4 pressure ulcer on their sacrum (tail bone) and three unstageable pressure ulcers located on left and right heels. A physician's order, dated 11/08/2023, documented: Wound Care: Sacral [triangular area at base of spine) wound Cleanse with wound cleanser Pack with 1/4 strength Dakins (diluted bleach water) soaked gauze Cover with sacral foam dressing Change daily and PRN every day and evening shift every Mon, Wed, Fri for wound care related to PRESSURE ULCER OF SACRAL…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide necessary foot care and treatment in accordance with professional standards, including provision of nail care for 2 of 6 residents (Resident 12 & 666) reviewed for nail care. This failure to provide timely foot/nail care, placed residents at risk for decreased quality of life and negative health outcomes. Findings included . 1) Resident 12 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The 12/16/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS), documented the resident had care needs related to high blood pressure, infection, and cerebral palsy (a disorder that affects a person's ability to move and maintain balance and posture). Care plan documents, dated 09/12/2023, showed Resident 12 had an Activities of Daily Living (ADL) /Mobility Self-Care Performance Deficit related to decreased activity tolerance and generalized weakness. Interventions included check nails every shift. Trim & clean PRN. Report any changes to the case manager.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident supervision, thorough accident investigations to determine the circumstances of resident accidents and implementation of measures to prevent reoccurrence for 1 of 8 residents (Resident 56) reviewed for accidents. These failures placed residents at risk for avoidable accidents and injury. Findings included . Resident 56 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple medically and psychologically complex diagnoses, including diabetes and depression. In an interview on 03/04/2024 at 1:39 PM , Resident 56 stated, I fell three times, that's why I have the walker, I got dizzy and fell. I have seizures . the walker is helpful. Care Plan (CP) documents, dated 01/09/2024, showed Resident 56 was identified as high risk for falls related to often refuses to wear proper foot wear .seizures, overactive bladder. Interventions included a four wheeled walker (FWW) for stability with ambulation, call light within reach, medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-11 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 4 residents (Resident 5) reviewed for respiratory care, were provided such care, in accordance with professional standards of practice. Failure of the facility to maintain and monitor oxygen equipment, obtain the prescribed pressure settings and care and maintenance orders for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP/an external device that provides a fixed pressure to keep breathing airways open while you sleep) therapy, placed residents at risk for ineffective assisted ventilation and unmet respiratory needs. Findings included . According to the undated facility policy for Oxygen Administration: a. Follow manufacturer recommendations for the frequency of cleaning equipment filters. b. Change oxygen tubing and mask/cannula weekly and as needed if it becomes soiled or contaminated. c. Change humidifier bottle when empty, every 72 hours or per facility policy, or as recommended by the manufacturer. Use only sterile water for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-11 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolatedHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Registered Nurse (RN) coverage for at least 8 hours for 1 of 30 days reviewed for staffing. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . A record review of the staffing pattern from 01/28/2024 through 03/03/2024 showed on 02/04/2024 there was no RN working during all 3 shifts. A record review of the daily staff posting showed there were no RNs working the day, evening, or night shift on 02/04/2024. On 03/11/2024 at 10:57 AM, Staff A, Administrator, said while looking at the staffing pattern there were no RNs working on 02/04/2024. At 11:37 AM Staff B, Director of Nursing Services, said while looking at the daily staff posting for 02/04/2024, it was a Sunday and there were no RNs working that day. WAC 388-97-1080(3)(a) .
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to fully inform in advance 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 2) reviewed for the use of a ankle wander guard alarm (sounds alarm when an at-risk wanderer approaches a monitored door ). This failure placed residents at risk for not knowing treatment risks, benefits, options, and alternatives. Findings included . Resident 2 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including high blood pressure, pneumonia, and hip fracture. The Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 10/01/2023, showed Resident 2 had moderate cognitive impairment and no wandering behaviors. On 10/12/2023 at 3:00 PM, Resident 2 was observed resting in his bed with a wander guard attached to his left ankle. Review of resident 2's medical record on 10/12/2023 showed no consent documentation for the use of the wander guard. On 10/18/2023 at 2:30 PM, Staff A, Director of Nursing Services, said the facility obtained the consent after the concern was brought to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0624 — isolatedPrepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe discharge for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for discharges. This failure led to Resident 1 utilizing emergency services on the day of discharge, re-hospitalization and placed residents at risk for psychosocial distress and medical complications. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of chronic respiratory failure, diabetes, and heart failure. The resident discharged from the nursing facility on 09/22/2023 to an Adult Family Home (AFH) in the community. On 10/18/2023 at 8:53 AM, a collateral contact (CC1), stated the resident arrived in the emergency room on the day of discharge from the nursing facility, 09/22/2023. CC 1 said the resident was discharged from the nursing facility to the AFH without oxygen services or medications. CC1 said hospital staff set up oxygen services, the AFH provider arranged medications, and the resident was discharged back to the AFH the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered care plan to address the use of a wander guard (sounds alarm when an at-risk wanderer approaches a monitored door) and potential elopement for 1 of 9 sampled residents (Resident 2) reviewed for care planning. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving inappropriate and inadequate care to meet their individualized safety needs. Findings included . Resident 2 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including high blood pressure, pneumonia, and hip fracture. The Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 10/01/2023, showed Resident 2 had moderate cognitive impairment and no wandering behaviors. Resident 2's September 2023 nurse progress notes showed Resident 2 had elopement behaviors and wore a functioning wander guard alarm on his left ankle. The notes showed prior to Resident 2's re-admission he had made several attempts to leave the building and facility grounds. On 10/12/2023 at 3:00…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$235,475 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $20,415 — penalty dated 2026-06-02
- $12,425 — penalty dated 2025-12-05
- $117,108 — penalty dated 2024-12-26
- $85,527 — penalty dated 2024-07-16
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-09-27 for 9 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-23 for 8 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| FROST, STEVEN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2020 |
| LINDAHL, JEFFREY | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2019 |
| LINDAHL, KIRKMAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2019 |
| LINDAHL, SCOTT | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2019 |
| FOUNDATION RESOURCE CENTER LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2020 |
| ANDERSON, BRANDT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/02/2022 |
| BERIHUN, ACHASHMAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2020 |
| BRACY, MCKENNZIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2020 |
| DE ORO, BRIANNA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/24/2025 |
| JOHNSON, CHATEAU | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/30/2024 |
| MAINA, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/27/2025 |
| NWANKWO, CHUKWUEMEKA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/01/2025 |
| ZWAHLEN, JAY | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 01/01/2024 |
| WA1WEST LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 02/01/2020 |
| LINDAHL, DAVID | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $565K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505254. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.