Panorama City Conv & Rehab Ctr

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 176 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 69.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 116 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 155 beds and averages 116.0 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 39 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.07 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.91 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.22 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.43 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.04 to 0.61 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-01-27 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor medical devices to prevent pressure related injuries for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 3 and 7) when reviewed for pressure injuries. Resident 3 experienced harm when they developed avoidable pressure ulcers to both heels and their left calf, related to lack of monitoring of a medical device (E-Z boot - plastic splint designed to stabilize the foot and ankle, preventing rotation and contracture with a soft, fleece-lined interior, non-skid base, and hook-and-loop velcro closure - also called a podus Boot). This failure placed residents at further risk for avoidable pressure injuries. Findings included. Review of the facility policy titled Management of Braces and Splints last reviewed 01/06/2026, showed Braces and splints shall be used only with appropriate clinical justification, proper authorization, and ongoing monitoring to prevent complications such as (including but not limited too) skin breakdown. It further showed Orders must…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the two staff person assistance and use of a gait belt for transfers as required according to the plan of care for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for falls. Resident 1 experienced harm when they fell and sustained a head laceration when staff transferred them without a second staff person to assist and properly support resident with a gait belt. This failure placed residents at risk for falls with injury, pain and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease and kidney disease. The quarterly minimum data set (MDS) an assessment tool, dated 02/26/2025, documented Resident 1 has moderately impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADLs). The Care Directive, dated 08/13/2024, documented Resident 1 required a sit-to-stand (a device which mechanically assists a resident to stand)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from avoidable accidents during a resident transfer for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accidents. Resident 1 experienced harm when facility staff did not follow the resident's individualized care plan fpr safe transfers and the resident sustained a fracture requiring hospitalization. This failure placed residents at risk for injury and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's policy Mechanical Lift Usage, revised 05/08/2017, showed residents that require maximum to total assistance with transfers were not to be lifted without the aid of a mechanical lift. Those residents who did not bear weight or were unable to hold on to the lift bar were to be lifted with Hoyer lifts (lifts that utilize a sling and lift the resident's entire body). The specific lift used by the resident would be written on the resident's care plan and nursing care directives.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dishwasher was cleaning dishes at required temperatures for 1 of 1 kitchen dishwashers reviewed under kitchen task. This failure created the potential to expose residents to unsanitary conditions and increased risk of foodborne illness. Findings included .On 01/26/2026 at 9:55 AM, during a kitchen observation, review of the Food Services Department Daily Dish Machine Temerature Log documented, Wash Cycle must reach a temperature of 150-160 degrees Fahrenheit. Rinse Cycle must reach a temperature of no less than 180 degrees. Please report temperature outside of the required range to your Supervisor immediately. The flowing days were listed outside the required temperature ranges:01/05/2026 PM Wash 145 degrees01/10/2026 AM Rinse 179 degrees01/11/2026 AM Rinse 172 degrees01/12/2026 AM Rinse 179 degrees01/13/2026 PM Rinse 145 degrees01/14/2026 PM Rinse 145 degrees01/18/2026 AM Rinse 179 degrees01/18/2026 PM Rinse 145 degrees01/19/2026 PM Rinse 145 degrees01/20/2026 AM Wash 142 degrees01/20/2026 PM Rinse 145…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-27 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective Antibiotic Stewardship Program, to promote appropriate use of antibiotics, reduce the risk of unnecessary antibiotic use and decrease the development of adverse side effects and antibiotic resistance for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 3, 5 and 130) when reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. This failure placed residents at risk for potential adverse outcomes associated with the inappropriate and/or unnecessary use of antibiotics. Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship last reviewed 01/5/2026, showed The facility practices the core elements of antibiotic stewardship, outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and prevention. The nurse will utilize McGeer constitutional infection criteria protocol to determine if it is necessary to treat with antibiotics and notify the provider of the results of diagnostics to ensure the resident is taking the appropriate antibiotic or if the antibiotic needs to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications (any drug that alters the brain affecting mood, behavior, perception and thought processes) were regularly monitored and documented on and gradual dose reduction (GRD, psychotropic medication decrease) had adequate indication for noncompletion for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 40 & 85) reviewed for unnecessary medication. This failure placed residents at risk of unnecessary medication usage and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Resident 40 Resident 40 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented Resident 40 was severely cognitively impaired. A physician's order, dated 11/22/2025, for Trazadone (antidepressant) 12.5 milligrams was prescribed for insomnia. A physician's order, dated 01/15/2026, for Trazadone (antidepressant) was increased to 25 milligrams daily for insomnia. The electronic health records (EHR) showed no documentation of side…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 49) when reviewed for bowel management. This failure placed the residents at risk for medical complications, poor clinical outcomes and a decreased quality of life. Findings included.Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 49 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia (a group of symptoms that effects memory) and adult failure to thrive. The resident was able to make needs known.During an interview on 01/23/2026 at 10:06 AM, Resident 49 stated they were given medicine to soften their stools and staff didn't tell them what they were getting. Resident 49 stated they had been having loose stools every day and did not want the medicine.Review of the EHR showed Resident 49 had been documented as having 14 soft stools and eight loose stools over the prior 24 days. Review showed the resident had two extra-large…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse and injuries of unknown origin timely to the State Agency for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 1 & 2) reviewed for abuse and injuries of unknown origin. This failure placed residents at risk for repeated incidents, unmet care needs and unidentified abuse and/or neglect. Findings included .<Resident 1>Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral vascular accident (A stroke) and neurological disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 05/18/2025, documented Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff with some activities of daily living (ADLs).Progress notes, dated 06/13/2025, documented during a physician's examination, Resident 1 was found with healing fractures of the right second, third, fourth, and fifth ribs. No source of the injury was identified in the progress notes.The facility investigation, dated 06/13/2025, was blank.The facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation to rule out abuse or injuries of unknown origin for 2 of 3 residents (1 & 3) reviewed for abuse or injuries of unknown origin. Failure to conduct a thorough investigation placed the residents at risk for unidentified abuse or neglect, poor clinical outcomes and a decreased quality of life. Findings included .<Resident 1>Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral vascular accident (A stroke) and neurological disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 05/18/2025, documented Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff with some activities of daily living (ADLs).Right shoulder dislocationThe facility investigation, dated 05/14/2025, documented Resident 1 was found to have an anterior subluxation of the glenohumeral joint (a dislocation of the shoulder). Resident 1 required surgery for the injury. The investigation did not reveal a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident assessments accurately reflected their health status and/or care needs for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 1) whose Minimum Data Sets (MDS, an assessment tool) were reviewed. The failure to accurately assess residents with a pressure ulcer (PU, a wound which develops due to prolonged pressure to the body) placed residents at risk for pain and discomfort, diminished quality of life and unidentified and/or unmet care needs. Findings included . Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a left hip fracture. The admission MDS, dated [DATE], showed Resident 1 was admitted without a PU. Hospital Discharge notes, dated 09/19/2024, documented Resident 1 sustained a PU to the hip from a wrap dressing applied to the resident's hips while hospitalized . Skin Evaluation form, dated 09/19/2024, documented Resident 1 had a PU to the hip. On 01/17/2025 at 3:31 PM, Staff C, licensed practical nurse and MDS coordinator, said Resident 1 was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review, revise and implement a comprehensive plan of care to include resident specific information for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 1) reviewed for care plans. The failure to establish care plans that were individualized, accurately reflected assessed care needs and provided direction to staff, placed residents at risk to receive inappropriate and inadequate care to meet their individualized needs. Findings included . Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a left hip fracture. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 09/25/2024, showed Resident 1 was dependent on staff with some activities of daily living. Skin Evaluation form, dated 09/19/2024, documented an assessment of Resident 1's skin, identifying the resident with a pressure ulcer (PU) to the hip. According to Skin Evaluation Forms on 09/24/2024 and 10/03/2024, Resident 1 continued to have a PU to the hip. The care plan, dated 09/19/2024, document…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-15 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure person centered side effect and target behavior monitoring was identified for psychotropic medications (drug taken to exert an effect on the chemical makeup of the brain and nervous system) for 4 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 74, 46, 42 & 3) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications, adverse side effects, falls, injury and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The facility policy entitled Psychoactive Medication, revised 04/07/2024, documented, POLICY: Specific behaviors are identified for each resident that affect the resident's quality of life. 9. Side effects must be listed on the Medication Treatment Record (TAR) for each group of medications. Side effects are documented daily on the MAR . 10. Care Pal must be developed around the behaviors the resident is currently exhibiting. Identify only the behaviors that can realistically be changed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-15 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure food products were labeled with a prepared or use by date, staff performed hand hygiene and glove changes during meal preparation and service, and that the high temperature (Hi-temp.) dishwasher washer met the minimum wash and rinse temperatures required for proper cleaning and sanitization of resident dishware and utensils. This failure placed residents at risk for food borne illnesses. Findings included . <Hi-Temperature Dishwasher Temperature Log> Observation of the facility's Hi-temp. dishwasher on 10/15/2024 at 7:39 AM, showed there was a laminated sign and a dishwasher temperature log where staff were to record the wash and rinse cycle temperatures of the dishwasher three times a day. The October 2024 dishwasher temperature log showed for proper sanitization of dishware/ utensils, the wash cycle must reach 150 - 160 degrees, and the rinse cycle needed to reach 180 degrees Fahrenheit (df). The log contained instruction to staff to PLEASE report temperatures out of the required range to your…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$42,904 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $31,714 — penalty dated 2026-01-27
• $11,190 — penalty dated 2025-05-12

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 25 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA