No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

North Bend Post Acute

219 Cedar Avenue South, North Bend, WA 98045 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 64 certified beds · (425) 888-2129 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (425) 888-2129 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Oct 2023Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)4 actual-harm citations$206,072 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Oct 2023
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 4 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (104) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $206,072 in federal fines (most recent 2023-12-12)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
209 Main Ave S · (425) 831-2380 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
248 Bendigo Blvd S · (425) 888-1672 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1229 NW 8th St · (425) 882-2040 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased2.7%14.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.2%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.7%1.0%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.9%17.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened3.3%17.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.5%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine94.8%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers9.9%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.8%22.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table11.8%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine50.0%82.0%79.4%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.591.331.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.911.521.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

25.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

25.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.07hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 52% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF25.2%CMS range 16.0–41.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 8.2–16.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge38.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.1%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay3.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened11.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.041.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.38
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.25
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.58
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.22
RN hoursweekends
42.0%
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 64 beds and averages 60.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.58 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.38 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.44 to 0.22 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

21
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-03-05)
34
at the previous standard inspection (2023-12-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

104 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 90 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 resident (Resident 43) reviewed for bowel management, 1 of 1 resident (Resident 4) reviewed for Diabetes (unstable blood sugar levels) management, and 1 of 4 residents (Residents 41) reviewed for non-pressure skin management received necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for quality of care. Resident 43 experienced harm when they were administered a daily laxative incongruent with prescribing provider order, did not receive antidiarrheal medications for prolonged diarrhea, did not have a stool sample obtained for laboratory evaluation or specialized diet initiated per standing orders which resulted in daily watery stools with increased, persistent discomfort and abdominal pain that required the use of a narcotic pain medication. The failure to recognize, accurately assess, provide ongoing monitoring for prolonged diarrhea with abdominal pain, unstable blood sugar levels, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-10-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently implement care planned safety interventions for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1 & 9) who exhibited aggressive behaviors to ensure the care planned behaviors did not escalate to verbal, physical or psychological abuse for 4 of 4 residents (Resident 7, 12, 2, 10), and the facility failed to protect 3 of 3 residents (Resident 6, 7, & 8) from potential abuse when they did not immediately remove (Staff E) from providing care to all residents after allegations of abuse and neglected were reported. These failures resulted in harm for Resident 8 who sustained an acute knee injury that required hospitalization and an increase in pain medications after being roughly handled by Staff E and harm to Resident 2 after being slapped by Resident 1. These failures placed all residents at risk for verbal, physical, and psychological abuse. Findings included . Review of the facility Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation policy, dated 04/27/2023, showed the facility would make all efforts to ensure all residents were protected from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the level of supervision necessary to prevent accidents for resident-to-resident altercations and falls for 4 of 4 (Residents 1, 3, 9, 15) residents reviewed for accidents, hazards, and supervision. The lack of supervision and implementation of safety measures to prevent resident-to-resident altercations allowed Resident 1 and Resident 9 to initiate verbal and physical altercations with multiple residents and caused physical harm to one resident (Resident 2) when they were slapped in the forearm. The facility failed to provide supervision and implement interventions for Resident 3, identified as a high fall risk, who experienced multiple potentially avoidable falls with harm when they sustained injuries to include a nasal bone fracture, an eyebrow laceration, and a hospital evaluation for head injury, and placed other residents at risk for potential verbal and physical abuse, serious injury, pain, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility Accidents and Supervision policy, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-10-04 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident's who were trauma survivors received culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice by not identifying, monitoring, or treating past experiences of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD - a disorder that develop when a person had experienced or witnessed a scary, shocking, terrifying, or dangerous event) for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 13, 12, & 14) reviewed for mood and behavior. These failures caused psychological harm to Resident 13 who was re-triggered and traumatized by facility staff and placed other residents with a trauma history at risk for unidentified triggers, re-traumatization, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . According to the undated facility Trauma Informed Care policy, the facility would provide care and services using approaches that were culturally competent, account for experiences and preferences, and address the needs of trauma…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-06-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Care Plans (CPs) were comprehensive, resident-specific and/or implemented for 4 of 17 residents (Residents 3, 54, 6, & 58) whose CPs were reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and frustration. Findings included . <Facility Policy>According to the facility's 2025 Care Planning - Resident Participation policy, the care planning process would include assessment of the resident's strengths and needs. The policy showed the CP would incorporate the resident's personal and cultural preferences, and be person-centered.<Resident 3>According to the 05/08/2026 Significant Change Minimum Data Set, Resident 3 was cognitively intact and independent with mobility and personal care. The MDS showed Resident 3 had diagnoses including a viral blood borne disease, an ileostomy (a surgical hole to allow the passing of digestive waste bypassing the large intestine), and puncture wounds on their lower back and pelvis. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) provided at least eight hours of direct care supervision per day for 5 of 31 days reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for delay in resident assessments, identification of changes in condition, provision of care and services outside the scope of practice of the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility's Daily Nurse Staff Documentation showed on five days (02/02/2025, 02/08/2025, 02/09/2025, 02/15/2025, and 02/16/2025 - on Saturdays and Sundays) from 01/27/2025 through 02/26/2025 there was no RN on site for eight hours as required by federal regulations. In an interview on 03/04/2025 at 11:21 AM, Staff I (Staffing Coordinator) stated they were responsible for scheduling daily nursing staff. Staff I stated when staff called out, they were responsible for finding a substitute. Staff I stated they started with in-house staffing resources who were off on that day. Staff I stated call outs were most common on the weekends. In an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure and designate a qualified staff person to serve as the Infection Preventionist (IP) and that the IP physically worked onsite in the facility at least part time hours as determined by the Facility Assessment. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet infection control issues and prevented a lack of over site of the facility staff's infection control practices. Findings included . Upon entrance to the facility on [DATE] Staff B (Director of Nursing) stated Staff D (Registered Nurse) was the facility's IP. Staff B provided Staff D's Certificate of Training from the Centers for Disease Control Nursing Home Infection Preventionist Training Course of 19.3 hours completed on 12/14/2020. In an interview on 03/04/2025 at 9:00 AM, Staff B stated Staff D was working as an IP offsite. Staff B stated Staff D did not work physically in the facility at least 20 hours a week according to the facility census, they came to the facility sometimes and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate and resolve grievances identified through a resident council meeting or provide a grievance log entry for 3 (Residents 14, 39, & 24) of 4 sample residents reviewed and 1 (Resident 35) supplemental resident, reviewed for grievances. The failure to thoroughly investigate a grievance and either resolve the resident grievance timely or provide an explanation the grievance could not be resolved placed residents at risk for frustration and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 2025 Resident and Family Grievances policy, the facility would make prompt efforts to resolve resident or family grievances. The facility would acknowledge a complaint or grievance and actively work towards a resolution. <Resident Council Minutes> The 12/30/2024 Resident Council Minutes included an Old Business section that included a resident concern regarding the ceiling in room North 3. A resident asked when it would be fixed. These Minutes' New Business section showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-05 · tag F0655 — pattern
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide baseline Care Plans (CP) to 6 (Residents 23, 25, 7, 58, 40 & 55) of 17 residents reviewed. The failure to provide the resident and/or their representative with a summary of their baseline CP placed residents and/or their representatives at risk for not being informed of their initial plan for delivery of care and services, and placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's 2024 Baseline Care Plan policy showed the baseline CP would be developed within 48 hours of the resident's admission and include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident. The policy showed a written summary of the baseline CP would be provided to the resident and/or their representative in a manner and language they could understand. <Resident 23> According to a 09/10/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 23 admitted to the facility on [DATE] after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received and/or participated in care conferences for 3 (Residents 23, 58, & 20) of 17 residents reviewed and failed to ensure Care Plans (CP) were updated and/or revised to reflect person-centered care for 5 (Residents 7, 25, 53, 8, & 58) of 17 sample residents. These failures left residents at risk for unmet care needs, inappropriate care, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 2024 Care Planning - Resident Participation policy, the facility would discuss the resident's plan of care with the resident and/or representative at regularly scheduled care conferences. The facility would obtain a signature from the resident and/or representative after discussion or viewing the CP. According to the facility's 2025 Comprehensive Care Plans policy, the facility would develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered CP for each resident that included measurable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) related to cleanliness and grooming for 6 (Residents 8, 22, 41, 37, 27, & 55) of 17 sample residents reviewed for ADLs. Facility failure to provide residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with shaving, bathing, and nail care placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene, unwanted long facial hair, embarrassment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 08/2024 ADLs policy, a resident who was unable to carry out ADLs would receive the necessary services to maintain good grooming, personal and oral hygiene. <Resident 8> According to the 12/25/2024 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 8 had impairment to their right arm and both legs, was assessed as cognitively impaired, and required one person assistance with personal hygiene. The MDS showed Resident 8 had no behavior of rejecting care during the assessment period. Observations on 02/26/2025 at 10:48 AM and on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 4 of 9 (Residents 49, 14, 7, & 25) residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers (PU - injury to the skin and underlying tissue due to prolonged pressure), received necessary care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, and prevent new ulcers from developing. Failure to timely monitor, assess, implement wound provider recommendations, and preventative skin measures placed all resident's at risk for deterioration in skin condition(s), pain, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the 2024 facility Pressure Injury Prevention and Management policy, showed the facility would use a systematic approach for PU prevention and management. This included prompt assessment and treatment of the PU, interventions to stabilize, reduce or remove underlying risk factors, monitoring the impact of the interventions, and modifying the interventions as necessary. The policy showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-05 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure planned breakout menus were followed during meal service and 5 (Resident 53, 25, 30, 40, & 20) residents with specialized diets were provided meals that were in alignment with their prescribed diets. These failures placed residents at risk for less than adequate nutritional intake, consuming meal portion sizes and calories other than as planned by a Registered Dietician (RD), and unmet nutritional needs. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's 2023 Menus and Adequate Nutrition policy showed menus were developed and prepared to meet residents choices including their nutritional, religious, cultural, and ethnic needs. This policy showed menus would be followed as posted and the facility would ensure the menus met the nutritional needs of residents. Review of the facility's 02/28/2025 Week 3 breakout menu showed the facility was serving Panko crusted fish with zucchini and tomatoes for lunch. This menu showed residents on large portion diets would receive 1 and ½ pieces of the fish.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to serve foods that were appetizing in appearance, palatable, and served at the proper temperature. Observations of meal services, a facility test tray, and interviews with 4 (Residents 25, 23, 12 & 45) sample residents identified concerns about the taste, temperature, and palatability of the food served by the facility. These failures placed residents at risk for less than adequate nutritional intake and dissatisfaction with meals. Findings included . <Resident 25> In an interview on 02/26/2025 at 1:41 PM, Resident 25 stated the food was, almost always cold. Resident 25 stated once in a while it was warm. <Resident 23> In an interview on 02/27/2025 at 11:28 AM, Resident 23 stated the food was not cooked well and reported the food was cold when it is delivered. <Resident 12> In an interview on 02/26/2025 at 10:18 AM, Resident 12 stated the food was not appetizing and reported it was, hit or miss if they got the requested alternatives. Resident 12 stated the toast was either too hard to eat or hardly toasted and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 90 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-05 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program that included developing an Antibiotic (ABO) Stewardship Program to promote appropriate use of ABOs and reduce the risk of unnecessary ABO use for 1 sample (Resident 8) and 1 supplemental (Resident 35) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary ABOs. This failure placed residents at risk for potential adverse outcomes, associated with the inappropriate/unnecessary use of ABOs. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the 2024 facility ABO Stewardship Program policy ABOs would be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's ABO Stewardship Program and in conjunction with the facility's general policy for Medication Utilization and Prescribing. The purpose of this program was to optimize the treatment of infections while reducing the adverse events associated with ABOs. This policy stated nursing staff would monitor the initiation of antibiotics on residents and conduct an ABO timeout within 48-72 of antibiotic therapy, to monitor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner that maintained and promoted dignity while assisting with meals for 3 of 13 residents (Resident 27, 112, & 57), reviewed for dining observations. This failure placed residents at risk for a diminished self-worth and over-all well-being. Findings included . <Resident 27> Observations during dining services on 02/28/2025 at 12:39 PM showed staff assisting Resident 27 to the dining room for lunch. The staff member stated to the resident, I'll get you a new bib. The staff member was referring to a clothing protector worn during meals. <Resident 112> Observations during dining services on 02/28/2025 at 12:48 PM showed Resident 112 sitting at a table in the dining room waiting for lunch with two other residents at the table. Staff placed Resident 112's lunch tray down in front of the resident and went back to the cart to continue passing trays. Resident 112 started reaching for the lid covering their food, so staff returned to the table and pulled the tray away from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system by which residents/representatives received required written notices at the time of transfer/discharge, or as soon as practicable for 4 of 5 residents (Residents 9, 1, 41, & 37) reviewed for hospitalizations. Failure to ensure written notification to the resident and/or the resident's representative of the reasons for the discharge in writing and in a language and manner they understood, placed residents at risk for a discharge that was not in alignment with the resident's stated goals for care and preferences. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to an undated facility, Transfer and Discharge . policy, the facility's transfer/discharge notice would be provided to the resident and the resident's representative in a language and manner in which they could understand. The form would include the specific reason and basis for the transfer or discharge, effective date, and would include information on how to obtain an appeal form.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or the resident's representative with a written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy, at the time of transfer or within 24 hours, for 3 of 5 sample residents (Resident 9, 1, & 37) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents and their representatives at risk of not being informed of their right to, and the cost of, holding the resident's bed while hospitalized that was necessary for decision-making. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to an undated facility, Bed Hold Prior to Transfer policy, it was the policy of the facility to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident representative regarding bed hold policies prior to transferring a resident to the hospital. <Resident 9> Review of Resident 9's 11/07/2024 Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE], with their return anticipated. Record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Minimum Data Set (MDS -an assessment tool) accurately reflected the status for 4 (Resident 25, 53, 1, & 41) of 17 residents reviewed for accuracy of assessments. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 25> According to an 11/27/2025 admission MDS, Resident 25 had no broken natural teeth. Review of a 11/20/2024 Admit Assessment form showed Resident 25 had their own teeth and included a question asking if the resident had broken teeth, this question was left blank by staff. In an interview on 02/26/2025 at 1:37 PM, Resident 25 stated they had some broken teeth and indicated staff never asked them about their teeth. In an observation at this time Resident 25 showed broken front upper and lower teeth and stated they were broken prior to admission to the facility. In an interview and observation on 02/28/2025 at 11:20 AM, Staff E (Licensed Practical Nurse)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a process to determine if a potential nursing home resident had mental health/intellectual disability needs which required further assessment/treatment) assessment was accurate to reflect the residents' mental health conditions for 3 of 6 (Resident 23, 1 & 27) residents and 1 supplemental resident (Resident 53) reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed residents at risk for inappropriate nursing home placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health needs. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of a 2024 facility, Resident Assessment - Coordination with PASRR Program policy showed the social services director would be responsible for keeping track of each resident's PASRR screening status, and referring to the appropriate authority. <Resident 23> According to a 12/06/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 23 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop the care plans for 3 of 17 sampled residents (Resident 53, 58, & 25) reviewed for care planning. This failure placed the residents at risk for inadequate care, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 2025 Comprehensive Care Plans policy, the facility would develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered Care Plan (CP) for each resident that included measurable objectives and timeframes. <Resident 53> According to a 01/31/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 53 required set up assistance from staff for eating and was on a therapeutic diet. This MDS showed Resident 53 was at risk for developing pressure ulcers. Review of a revised 11/02/2024 nutrition CP showed Resident 53 had the potential for altered nutrition with an identified goal that the resident would maintain adequate nutritional status as evidenced by stable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to clarify diagnoses on physician's orders and to monitor and document resident's behaviors while on antipsychotic medications for 3 (Residents 8, 25, & 61) of 17 sample residents reviewed. These failures left residents at risk for unmet care needs, inappropriate care interventions, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Resident 8> According to the 12/25/2024 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 8 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medically complex conditions including non-Alzheimer's dementia (group of cognitive disorders that cause memory loss and confusion), depression, and anxiety. The MDS showed Resident 8 received antipsychotic and antidepressant medications every day during assessment period. The MDS showed Resident 8 had no behavior of rejecting care during the assessment period. Observations on 02/27/2025 at 11:29 AM, on 02/28/2025 at 9:24 AM, and on 03/03/2025 at 11:32 AM showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a discharge planning process to effectively transition residents to a community setting for 2 residents (Resident 23 & 60) of 17 residents reviewed for discharge planning. This failure placed the residents at risk for an unsafe discharge and diminished quality of life. Findings included <Facility Policy> According to an undated facility, Transfer and Discharge . policy, for anticipated transfers or discharges, a physician's order would be obtained for the transfer or discharge along with instructions or precautions for ongoing care. <Resident 23> According to a 12/06/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 23 admitted to the facility on [DATE], had clear speech, was understood, and could understood others. This MDS showed Resident 23 had a surgical wound and received surgical wound care during the assessment period. In an interview on 02/27/2025 at 11:23 AM, Resident 23 stated they were frustrated they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to monitor and identify changes in a resident's skin condition timely for 1 (Resident 25) of 7 sampled residents reviewed for skin conditions. These failures placed residents at risk for complications, worsening conditions, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 25> According to an 11/27/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 25 had clear speech, was understood, able to understand others, and had no memory impairment. This MDS showed staff assessed Resident 25 was at risk for developing pressure ulcers/injuries and had pressure ulcers on admission. During observations of wound care on 03/03/2025 at 11:25 AM with Staff K (Licensed Practical Nurse), Resident 25 reminded the nurse about the rash they had under their right-side abdominal fold and their right armpit. Staff K observed the areas which showed large areas of red, inflamed skin with some drainage noted to the areas. Staff K stated they would go get the powder they were using to the skin areas and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a restorative program was provided for 2 of 5 (Residents 41 & 23) sample residents reviewed for restorative nursing services. These failures placed residents at risk for a decline in Range of Motion (ROM), a reduction in mobility, increased dependence on staff, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 41> According to the 01/29/2025 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 41 had medical conditions including a stroke (brain injury) resulting in paralysis (loss of function) to one half of their body and required one-person extensive assistance with personal hygiene. The MDS showed Resident 41 was assessed as cognitively impaired and did not reject care during the assessment period. Review of a 02/29/2025 revised ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self-care deficit Care Plan (CP) showed Resident 41 had right sided weakness due to a stroke. Staff were instructed to apply a splint on the resident's right hand daily as tolerated and to report any skin issues related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-05 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide social services interventions for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The failure to initiate further assessment and appropriate interventions when the resident answered positively to a self-harm question, placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and non addressed mental health concerns. Findings included . <Resident 1> According to the 11/27/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE], had no memory impairment, and had a diagnosis of depression. The MDS showed Resident 1 received antidepressant and antianxiety medications on seven of seven days during the assessment period. The 11/27/2024 MDS included a PHQ - 9 (an assessment for screening the severity of depression) of Resident 1's mood which identified the presence of multiple symptoms of depression. The section titled, Thoughts that you would be better off dead, or of hurting yourself in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0851 — isolated
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to submit complete and accurate direct care staffing information to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS- a federal agency managing health care programs and health insurance standards) for Quarter 1 (January 1, 2024 through March 31, 2024) reviewed for Payroll Based Journal (PBJ- mandatory reporting of staffing information based on payroll data) submission. This failure effected the accuracy of Nursing Home (NH) staffing level data collected by CMS and had the potential to impact provisions of resident care and services. Findings included . <CMS- Electronic Staffing Data Submission PBJ> Review of the June 2022, CMS Long-Term Care Facility PBJ Policy Manual, showed long term care facilities were required to electronically submit direct care staffing information based on payroll and auditable data. The data, when combined with census information can be used to not only report on the level of staff in each nursing home, but reports staff turnover and tenure, that can impact the quality of care delivered at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1) a system by which the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO, an advocacy group for individuals residing in nursing homes) received required resident discharge/transfer information, and 2) a system by which residents or their representative(s) were notified of the transfer or discharge for 6 (Residents 1, 4, 5, 8, 14, & 19) of 6 residents reviewed for hospitalization. Failure to ensure required notification was provided, prevented the LTCO the opportunity to educate residents and advocate for them regarding the discharge process. Findings included . <Facility policy> The facility's transfer/discharge notice will be provided to the resident and the resident's representative in a language and manner in which they can understand. the facility will provide a notice of transfer and the facility's bed hold policy to the resident and representative. <Resident 5> According to a 10/10/2023 Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0625 — widespread
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or the resident's representative a written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy, at the time of transfer or within 24 hours, for 6 (Residents 1, 4, 5, 8, 14, & 19) of 9 residents reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents and their representatives at risk of not being informed of their right to, and the cost of, holding the resident's bed while hospitalized . Findings included . <Facility policy> At the time of transfer for hospitalization, the facility will provide to the resident and/or the resident representative written notice which specified the duration of the bed-hold policy and addressed information explaining the return of the resident to the next available bed. <Resident 5> Review of Resident 5's 08/10/2023 Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE], with their return anticipated. Resident Record (RR) review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-12 · tag F0801 — widespread
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) engage a full-time Registered Dietician (RD) and 2) provide a dietary manager with the appropriate competencies to manage and supervise the facilities kitchen. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet dietary and nutritional needs. Findings included . In an interview on 12/05/2023 at 11:30 AM Staff S (RD) stated they worked at the facility on a part time basis. Staff S stated they worked in the facility on Tuesdays. Review of timesheets for dietary staff showed monthly documentation of Staff S's hours at the facility. Staff S worked 41 hours for the June payroll cycle, 31.5 hours for the September cycle, and 32 hours for the November cycle. There were no documented hours for the July, August, or October payroll cycles. In an interview on 12/11/2023 at 1:50 PM Staff T (Dietary Manager) stated they did not complete the training required that would allow them to work as a Dietary Manager without a full-time RD at that time. Staff T stated they were in the process of enrolling. In an interview on 12/12/2023 at 12:41…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-12-12 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide an adequate number of dietary staff. The failure to provide the kitchen with adequate dietary staff left residents at risk for less than palatable meals, improperly prepared meals, foodborne illness, late food service, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Assessment> According to the 11/10/2023 Facility Assessment (FA - a document developed and maintained by nursing homes that assessed the resident population and their care needs, the condition of the building, risks and threats to the building such as unique environmental risks etc., and the resources the facility would require to manage resident needs and safety including staff and equipment) the facility management assessed the nutritional needs of the resident population to require a Registered Dietician (RD), a Dietary Manager, three cooks, and three dietary aides. <Kitchen Staffing> Observation on 12/5/2023 at 8:55 AM showed three staff working in the kitchen. Staff U (Business Office Manager) stated they could be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was stored, prepared, and distributed in a sanitary manner. The failure to ensure food was stored correctly, surfaces were sanitized, food was prepared in an area free of potential contaminants, food waste was disposed in a fashion to prevent attracting pests, and food was transported in a fashion to prevent exposure to airborne pathogens left residents at risk for foodborne illness, food contamination, less than palatable food, and other negative outcomes. Findings included . <Food Storage> Observation of the kitchen's food storage on 12/05/2023 at 8:59 AM showed an opened box of cream of wheat on a shelf by the range. The box was not labeled to indicate when it was opened. Several boxes of cream of wheat were observed on a shelf in the dry storage area. Four of the boxes did not have a label indicating when they were delivered. Five cans of red salsa and six cans of marinara sauce were also observed to have no label indicating when they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe, comfortable and homelike environment on 2 of 2 units (north and south units), 1 of 1 dining rooms, 1 of 1 resident lounge/ Television (TV) area, and 1 of 1 kitchens. The failure to ensure resident rooms and halls were free of wall gouges and electrical repair, furniture and walls in the dining room and resident lounge were not peeling or gouged, and that essential equipment remained in good repair placed residents at risk for a less than homelike environment and other negative outcomes. Findings included . <Disposable Table Ware> Observation on 12/05/2023 at 1:02 PM during lunch service showed all residents in the dining room being served their meals in Styrofoam containers. Residents were served lunch with plastic utensils instead of silverware. In an interview on 12/05/2023 at 9:19 AM, Resident 44 stated, the food could use some help. The resident stated lately they were being served meals in Styrofoam containers with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Care Plans (CPs) were reviewed and revised as needed, for 8 of 16 (Residents 1, 31, 46, 19, 17, 5, 8, & 21) sample residents whose CPs were reviewed. Failure to ensure CPs were revised to reflect residents needs for care left residents at risk for unmet care needs, the provision of unneeded care, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included <Facility Policy> The 2022 Care Plan Revision Upon Status Change facility policy showed resident's comprehensive CPs would be reviewed and revised as necessary. This policy showed the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) coordinator along with the interdisciplinary team would discuss the resident's condition and collaborate on intervention options. The CP would be modified by the MDS coordinator or other designated staff, and these modifications would be communicated to the direct care staff. <Resident 1> According to the 09/12/2023 Quarterly MDS, Resident 1 used a feeding tube for up to 50% of their nutritional intake. The MDS showed Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-12 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 nursing assistants (Staff Z, AA, & BB) with an active Nursing Assistant Registered (NAR) license met the training and competency evaluation requirements under the Nurse Aide Training or Competency Evaluation Program (NATCEP) within four months from their date of hire. This failure placed residents' safety at risk and predisposed residents to receive care from staff with incomplete nurse aide credentials. Findings included . <Staff Z> Record review of the facility's active staff list showed Staff Z (NAR) was hired on 08/01/2023 and should complete their training on 12/01/2023 per the updated 10/13/2023 Basic Training and Certification Deadline Changes for Long-Term Care (LTC) Workers related to Covid-19 (a respiratory infection categorized as a global outbreak) in order to continue working for the facility. Review of the daily staff assignment sheets from 11/07/2023 - 12/07/2023, showed Staff Z worked for the facility without meeting their training and competency requirements on 12/02/2023, 12/03/2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-12-12 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system that provided annual nurse aide reviews for 2 of 2 Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs - Staff CC & DD) whose personnel files were reviewed for CNA performance evaluations. Failure to complete a performance review of every nurse aide at least once every 12 months, and provide regular in-service education based on the outcome of these reviews, placed residents at risk for receiving care from underqualified nursing staff and unmet care needs. Findings included . <Staff CC> Review of Staff CC's personnel file on 12/12/2023 showed the staff was hired on 03/30/2022 and would need their annual performance evaluation reviewed and completed on 03/30/2023. The facility was not able to provide any documentation to support Staff CC received an annual performance review from the facility as required. <Staff DD> Review of Staff DD's personnel file on 12/12/2023 showed the staff was hired on 05/01/2021 and would need their annual performance evaluation reviewed and completed on 05/01/2022 and 05/01/2023. The facility was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    <Resident 26> According to the 09/22/2023 Quarterly MDS Resident 26 had diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD - an irreversible kidney condition) and a nerve condition that made voiding urine more difficult. Record review showed Resident 26 had a 09/28/2023 Physician's Order (PO) restricting the resident to 1000 Milliliters (ML) of fluid a day. The PO showed the facility's dietary department was responsible for 600 ML daily and nursing would give 125 ML three times a day. Review of the November 2023 MAR showed there were two places for nurses to document how much fluid Resident 26 was provided on night shift. On the first night shift column on 28 of 30 days nurses documented Resident 26 received 950 ML. On the second night shift column on 28 of 30 days nurses documented Resident 26 received 125 ML of fluid. In an interview on 12/12/2023 at 10:11 AM Staff B stated it was important to accurately document how much fluid was provided to a resident on a fluid restriction. Staff B stated Resident 26 was provided fluids according to their fluid restriction. Staff B stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain infection control practices that provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases. 1) The facility failed to ensure staff used Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for 1 of 7 (Residents 43) residents reviewed for Transmission Based Precautions (TBP). 2) The facility failed to perform Hand Hygiene (HH) during resident care and during dining service for 5 (Resident 43, 8, 19, 28, 31) of 7 residents observed. 3) The facility failed to assess and monitor measures to prevent the growth of Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens in the building water systems. These failures placed residents at risk for the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections. Finding included . <Facility Policy> The facility's 10/01/2023 TBP policy showed that the facility staff would apply TBPs to residents who were known or suspected to be infected or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program that included developing an antibiotic stewardship program to promote appropriate use of Antibiotics (ABOs) and reduce the risk of unnecessary ABO use for 2 of 3 (Residents 17 & 14) residents reviewed for unnecessary ABOs. This failure placed residents at risk for potential adverse outcomes, associated with the inappropriate/unnecessary use of ABO's. <Facility Policy> The facility's 10/01/2023 Antibiotic Stewardship Program policy showed the purpose for their ABO stewardship program was to optimize the treatment of infection's while reducing the adverse events associated with ABO use. This policy showed that when an ABO was ordered, the Infection Preventionist (IP) would review for appropriateness, monitor response to the ABO, and would determine if the ABO is still indicated or adjustments should have been made. This policy showed that nursing staff would monitor the initiation of ABOs for residents and conduct an ABO time-out within 48-72 hours of ABO…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-12 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform residents of the risks and benefits associated with psychotropic medication therapy (medications that affected the mind, emotions, and behavior), for 3 (Residents 31, 19, & 17) of 5 residents reviewed and gave 1 (Resident 19) a psychotropic medication despite Resident 19 declining to consent for the medication. These failures detracted from the residents' ability to exercise their right to make informed treatment decisions and prevented residents from exercising their right to decline treatment. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of a 09/04/2023 Use of Psychotropic Medication facility policy showed residents and/or their representatives would be educated on the risks and benefits of psychotropic drug use, as well as alternative treatments and non-pharmacological interventions. <Resident 31> According to the 10/23/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 31 had memory impairment and complex medical diagnoses including depression. The MDS showed Resident 31 was administered an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to initiate and complete a thorough grievance investigation for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 31, & 8) reviewed for missing property. The facility failed to ensure there was a summary statement coming from the resident themselves regarding their lost property and how the event would affect their quality of life if left unresolved. These failures placed residents at risk for frustration and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's undated Resident and Family Grievances policy showed the Grievance Official was responsible for overseeing the grievance process. The policy outlined responsibilities including receiving and tracking of grievances and issuing written grievance decisions to the resident. <Resident 31> According to the 10/23/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 31 had clear speech, usually understood conversations. Resident 31 made their own decisions. Resident 31 was able to hear adequately with the use of their hearing aid.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-12 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA), including Care Area Assessments, were completed within 14 days for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 8) reviewed for a decline in mental status, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), and mobility. Failure to identify Resident 8's change in status and to complete a SCSA placed the resident at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs. Findings included . According to the October 2023 Resident Assessment Instrument Manual (a manual that directs staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents) a SCSA is a comprehensive assessment that must be completed when the interdisciplinary team has determined that a resident meets the significant change guidelines for either major improvement or decline. Review of the guidelines showed, a SCSA is appropriate if there is a determination a significant change in a resident's condition from their baseline had occurred and the resident's condition is not expected to return to baseline within two weeks. <Resident 8> According to an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Sets (MDS - an assessment tool) were completed and accurate for 2 (Residents 19 & 46) of 16 sample residents. Facility failure to complete accurate MDS assessments prevented the facility from transmitting accurate and complete information to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services for facility quality ratings, and left residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet needs. <Resident 19> According to a 10/30/2023 Quarterly MDS, Resident 19 was assessed to have no memory impairment and had adequate hearing. This assessment showed Resident 19 had clear speech, was understood by others, and could understand others in conversation. According to this assessment, Resident 19 had no acute change to their mental status. Review of Section F (Preferences for Customary Routine and Activities) of the 10/30/2023 Quarterly MDS showed staff marked 0 indicating the interview for Resident 19's daily preferences should not be complete because the resident was rarely/never understood. The following assessment which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a process to determine if a potential nursing home resident had mental health/intellectual disability needs which required further assessment/treatment) assessment was obtained and/or accurate to reflect the residents' mental health conditions for 2 of 5 (Resident 31 & 5) residents reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed residents at risk for inappropriate nursing home placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health needs. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's undated Resident Assessment - Coordination with PASRR Program showed the Social Services Director (SSD) was responsible for keeping track of each resident's PASRR screening status. The policy outlined any resident who exhibited a significant change and/or a newly evident or possible Serious Mental Illness (SMI) would be referred promptly to the state mental health for resident review. <Level 1 PASRR Guidance> According to the revised 09/2018 Level 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to sign only for tasks completed for 1 (Residents 1), clarify Physician's Orders (POs) for 6 (Residents 51, 26, 5, 31, 43, & 14), and follow POs for 1 (Resident 14) of 16 sample residents reviewed. These failures left residents at risk for unmet care needs, inappropriate care interventions, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Signing Only for Tasks Completed> <Resident 1> According to the 09/12/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed Resident 1 had multiple medically complex diagnoses and received up to half their nutrition via a feeding tube. Resident 1's POs included a 03/07/2023 for the resident to be fed via a feeding tube. The order showed nurses should provide 1440 milliliters (MLs) of artificial nutrition. In an interview on 12/11/2023 at 10:36 AM Staff Q (Resident Care Manager) stated Resident 1 currently received their nutrition orally, not via a feeding tube. Staff Q stated since the resident's feeding tube malfunctioned for the second time on 09/23/2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensures residents who were dependent on facility staff for assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) received the assistance they were assessed to require for 6 of 11 residents (Residents 26, 51, 31, 4, 14, & 41) reviewed for ADLs. The failure to provide necessary assistance with bathing (Residents 26, 51, 14, & 41), grooming (Residents 31), and nail care (Resident 4) left residents at risk unmet care needs, odors, and a diminished sense of self-worth. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 2022 ADL policy, the facility would assess each resident's need for ADL assistance including bathing and grooming. The policy showed the facility would develop and implement individualized Care Plans (CP) to address residents' ADL needs. <Resident 26> According to the 9/22/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool), Resident 26 had medically complex conditions including respiratory failure, irreversible…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-12 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and care that maintained their ability to hear adequately and effectively for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 31) reviewed for treatment and services to maintain hearing. Failure to ensure residents' hearing deficits were addressed accordingly placed residents at risk for frustrations, decline in communication, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's undated Hearing and Vision Services policy showed the facility would utilize the comprehensive assessment process to identify and assess a resident's hearing ability to provide person-centered care including ongoing monitoring of the resident's sensory problems. The policy outlined employees would assist the resident with the use of their devices/adaptive equipment needed to maintain hearing and should refer any identified need for hearing services/appliances to social services. <Resident 31> According to the 10/23/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to assess and implement wound treatment orders and care interventions for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 14) with pressure ulcers. This failure placed residents at risk for development and/or worsening of wounds, infection, and medical complications. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the October 2022 Pressure Injury Prevention and Management facility policy showed licensed nurses would conduct a full body skin assessment on all residents upon admission/readmission, weekly, and after any newly identified pressure injury. <Resident 14> According to the 11/15/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), Resident 14 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after receiving a surgical toe amputation. Resident 14 was assessed to make their own decisions. Resident 14 admitted to the facility with medically complex diagnoses including a right lower leg skin infection, heart failure, and end stage kidney disease. Review of the 08/09/2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and initiate an intervention to prevent recurrence for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 41) reviewed for accidents. This failure placed residents at risk for avoidable incidents, injury, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the October 2022 facility policy titled Fall Risk Assessment showed the facility would provide an environment that is free from accident hazards and provides supervision and assistive devices to each resident to prevent avoidable accidents. <Resident 41> According to the 11/02/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) Resident 41 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 41 made their own decisions. Resident 41 had medically complex conditions to include anemia, anxiety, depression, and low thyroid function. Review of the 05/02/2023 Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care Plan (CP) showed Resident 41 required assistance of one staff member for toileting and transfers due to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with Foley Catheters (FC - a tube placed in the bladder to drain urine) received appropriate care and services for 1 of 3 (Resident 43) residents reviewed for indwelling FCs. This failure to obtain and follow Physician Orders (PO) for FCs and FC care, placed residents at risk for infection and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The facility's 2022 Indwelling Catheter Use and Removal policy showed the facility would provide appropriate care for the catheter in accordance with professional standards of practice. <Resident 43> According to the 10/22/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) Resident 43 showed no memory/cognitive impairment and was assessed to require extensive physical assistance from staff for bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and personal hygiene. This MDS indicated Resident 43 did not exhibit rejection of care during the assessment period. This assessment showed Resident 43 had an indwelling FC. The 10/20/2023 Urinary Care Plan (CP)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain and monitor resident's weights for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 1 & 23) reviewed for nutrition and failed to follow dietary orders for 1 of 4 (Resident 41) residents reviewed. The failure to collect weights as ordered and per the facility policy and to serve residents diets outside of Physician Orders (PO) left residents at risk for unplanned weight changes, risk for aspiration, fluid overload, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 2022 Weight Monitoring policy, the facility would ensure all residents maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status. The policy identified weight as a useful indicator of nutritional status. The policy identified a significant weight gain as five percent (%) change in one month, 7.5 % change in three months, or 10 % change in six months. This policy showed the physician would be notified of any significant weight change. <Resident 1>…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility regarding dialysis (a procedure to clean and filter the body's waste products) treatment and services for 1 of 1 (Resident 26) residents reviewed for dialysis care. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, unidentified medical complications, and adverse health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 2023 Hemodialysis (a type of dialysis treatment done in a clinic) policy the facility would coordinate with the dialysis center to ensure the resident's treatments needs were met. The policy directed nurses to ensure there was ongoing communication between the nursing home and dialysis staff. <Dialysis Contract> Review of the Dialysis contract provided on 12/05/2023 showed the contract was between a sister facility and a dialysis center located in another county. A second contract was provided via email between Resident 26's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the appropriate competencies and skill sets to provide nursing care and related services that assured resident safety and attained or maintained their highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being as identified by resident assessments and according to individual plans of care, in consideration of the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population, and in accordance with the facility assessment. The facility failed to provide education and training that pertained to the current resident population for 2 of 2 Licensed Practical Nurses (LPNs - Staff EE & FF) whose annual in-service training and education records were reviewed for competency. Failure of nursing staff to demonstrate knowledge, skills, abilities, behaviors, or other characteristics necessary perform job-related functions safely and successfully resulted in deficiencies demonstrating a lack of competent resident care by the facility's nursing staff. Findings included . According to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — isolated
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain eight hours of Registered Nurse (RN) coverage to directly supervise resident care for 2 of 30 days (11/23/2023 and 11/26/2023) reviewed for staffing. This failure placed residents at risk for a delay in identification, response to changes in medical conditions, and provision of care and services by an RN, inadequate assessments, and unmet needs. Findings included . The Staffing Pattern form provided by Staff A (Administrator) on 12/05/2023 showed staffing review dates from 11/04/2023 through 12/04/2023 and identified the facility's actual number of direct-care nursing staff working each shift (Days, Evenings, and Nights). The document showed the facility did not have at least eight consecutive hours of RN coverage a day, seven days a week during: The week of 11/19/2023 - 11/25/2023 on 11/23/2023; and the week of 11/26/203 - 12/02/2023 on 11/26/2023 as required In an interview on 12/11/2023 at 8:02 AM, Staff B (Director of Nursing) stated they were aware that there were RN staffing issues identified during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic medications were only used when the medication was necessary and the PRN use was limited according the prescribing guidelines for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 31) and failed to complete an Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) assessment for 1 of 5 (Resident 41) residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use. This failure placed the residents at risk for receiving unnecessary medications with potentially harmful and unwarranted adverse side effects. Findings included . <PRN Use> <Facility Policy> According to the facility's revised 09/04/2023 Use of Psychotropic Medication policy, PRN orders for all psychotropic drugs were used for a limited duration (i.e. 14 days). The policy instructed the attending physician that if they believed it was appropriate for the PRN order to be extended beyond 14 days, they would document their rationale in the resident's medical record and indicate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    <Resident 43> In an observation and interview on 12/08/2023 at 8:46 AM, Staff O (LPN) prepared 30 milliliters (ml) of a liquid laxative for Resident 43. The order directed staff to administer 17 grams of the laxative daily. Staff O was unable to explain how they measured 17 grams to be 30 ml. Staff O stated the order was inaccurate. Staff O stated the normal dose for the prescribed laxative was 30 ml and that is why they prepared 30 ml for Resident 43. In an observation and interview on 12/08/2023 at 8:50 AM Staff B (Director of Nursing) assessed the physician orders and the bottle of the laxative. Staff B then directed Staff O to give 30 ml of the laxative, stating you give 30 ml of this laxative. The surveyor stopped Staff B prior to the medication being administered, and asked how 30 ml was equivalent to 17 grams, Staff B stated 30 ml was not equivalent to 17 grams and stated they would hold the medication. Staff B stated the physician order was inaccurate and needed to be corrected. REFERENCE: WAC 388-97-1060(3)(k)(ii). Based on observation, interview, and record review the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to serve foods that were palatable and served at the proper temperature. Observation of meal preparation and interviews with 4 sample residents (Residents 41, 5, 27, & 21) identified concerns with the temperature, and overall palatability of food served by the facility. Failure by the facility to ensure meals were at the proper temperature and palatable when served, placed residents at risk for less than adequate nutritional intake and dissatisfaction with meals. Findings included . <Meal Tickets> Observation on 12/08/2023 at 10:13 AM showed Staff T (Dietary Manager) writing dietary orders on tray tickets. Staff T stated the facility recently switched computer systems and now dietary orders no longer transferred to the tray tickets. Staff T stated they knew all the residents' dietary orders, so they were able to add the necessary information. In an interview on 12/11/2023 at 1:50 PM Staff T stated they depended on nursing to communicate when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-12 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 sample residents (Resident 4) reviewed for choices received food that accommodated the resident's choices, preferences, and intolerances. Failure of the facility placed residents at risk of dissatisfaction with food, unnecessary weight loss, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 4> According to the 10/07/2023 Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 4 had clear speech and was cognitively intact. Resident 4 had multiple complex medical diagnoses including uncontrolled blood sugar (BS) levels in the body and was administered an injectable medication during the assessment period to manage their condition. In an interview on 12/05/2023 at 9:59 AM, Resident 4 stated they watched what they ate because their BS levels were unpredictable, sometimes too high, and sometimes very low. Resident 4 stated they did not like certain foods including most breads and high sugar desserts because of their sugar content. Resident 4 stated staff received their food choices…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-12-12 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure specialized rehabilitative services were provided as determined by the Physician's Order (PO) for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 5 & 8) reviewed for rehabilitation with skilled therapy services. This failure prevented residents from attaining, maintaining, or restoring their highest practicable level of physical, mental, functional, and psycho-social well-being. Findings included . <Resident 5> According to a 10/10/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 5 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including a traumatic spinal cord injury that resulted to the loss of muscle function in both their legs. The MDS showed Resident 5 had intact memory and was able to understand and be understood by others. In an interview on 12/06/2023 at 10:43 AM, Resident 5 stated they used to work with the staff in doing exercises and indicated the last time they were provided assistance with this was a week before. Review of Resident 5's POs showed a 10/20/2023 order for PT [Physical therapy]/OT…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — widespread
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure abuse policies and procedures were implemented by failing to identify and investigate allegations of abuse and neglect, and protect residents from potential abuse for 8 of 15 residents (Resident 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 13, & 15) reviewed for incidents, and failed to conduct background screening for 2 of 3 agency staff (Agency Staff O, & E) reviewed for screening. These failures placed residents at risk for unidentified abuse and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, revised 07/01/2023, showed the facility would designate an Abuse Prevention Coordinator in the facility who was responsible for reporting alleged or suspected abuse and neglect to the state survey agency. The facility would provide ongoing oversight and supervision of staff to ensure abuse policies were implemented. Additionally, potential employees would be screened for a history of abuse and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to have sufficient staff to provide and supervise care as evidenced by information provided by 4 residents (Resident 5, 21, 17, & 16) interviewed, 1 family interview, 4 staff interviews, and observations. The facility had insufficient number of administrative and nursing staff to provide care and services for residents in the areas of supervision, behavior management, wound management, staffing coordination, central supply, infection control and antibiotic stewardship. Findings included . <Resident Interviews> <Resident 5> In an interview on 08/30/2023 at 2:17 PM Resident 5 stated call light response depended on who was working, at times it could take one to two hours for staff to respond to the call light, and it happened usually once a week. Resident 5 stated during meal service you can't get anyone to respond but eventually they will come or change of shift, can't get anyone to answer the light, and would request to be put into bed at 4:30 PM because if not, they would end up stuck in their chair until staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to post the daily nurse staffing information including the total number of and actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift and the number of current residents residing in the facility. The failure to post required nurse staffing information daily and failure to retain the daily posted documents for a minimum of 18 months placed residents at risk for inadequate staffing and deterred the facility from ensuring adequate staff each shift. Findings included . Observation on 09/26/2023 at 11:06 AM showed the daily nurse staffing hours posted at the nurse's station at a standing person's eye level. The posted document was dated 08/08/2023. In an observation and interview on 09/26/2023 at 11:14 AM, Staff C (Operations Manager) observed the posted hours and confirmed the date on the sheet showed 08/08/2023. Staff C stated they were not aware of the requirement and did not know who was supposed to post the nursing hours. REFERENCE: WAC 388-97-1620(2)(b)(i).

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-04 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility administration failed to obtain and use resources to manage the facility effectively and efficiently to maintain substantial compliance with federal regulatory requirements. The Administration failed 1) to ensure residents were free from abuse and neglect, 2) to investigate incidents of abuse and neglect, 3) to maintain a safe and supervised environment for vulnerable residents, 4) to provide prevention, scare and services for pressure ulcers, 5) to identify and treat resident pain, 6) to identify and provide culturally competent trauma informed care to trauma survivors, 7) to ensure residents were free from unnecessary antipsychotic medications, 8) to provide sufficient staff to meet resident care needs, 9) to ensure staff was competent to perform resident care and nursing tasks, 10) to review, update, and implement a Facility Assessment (FA) that met the needs of the resident population, 11) to implement a transfer agreement with a local hospital, 12) to develop, implement, and monitor a Quality Assurance and Process Improvement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-04 · tag F0837 — widespread
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Governing Body failed to establish, implement, policies and practices for the nursing home's operations and management. The failure to monitor and support the continuity of management responsibilities during turnover of required positions placed the facility in non-compliance in seventeen areas of resident care and placed residents at risk for incompetent care, unmet needs, injury, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Adequate and Qualified Workforce> The Governing Body failed to employ or designate qualified individuals into required positions including Infection Control Preventionist, Social Services, Administrator Designee, and Staff Development Nurse. This failure resulted in widespread failure to meet identified resident care needs. <Administration> The Governing Body appointed one of its members to be the Interim Administrator and failed to oversee the requirement for Administrators to be onsite, full-time, to oversee and direct daily operations of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-04 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to review and update the Facility Assessment (FA) as necessary, at least annually. The failure to complete an annual review deterred the facility from identifying and implementing programs requiring revision and delegation of tasks of critical staff open positions placing residents at risk for unmet needs and inadequate care. Findings included . In an interview on 09/26/2023 at 3:56 PM, Staff B provided documents including a draft of the FA worksheet. Staff B stated they did not have a copy of the current FA and would need to ask for it. Staff B returned with a 08/08/2022 FA and stated the corporate resource person emailed it to them. In an interview on 09/29/2023 at 11:05 AM, Staff A (Interim Administrator) stated they became the Interim Administrator in June 2023 and Staff B started as the Operations Manager in June 2023. Staff A stated Staff B did not have a copy of the current FA and was asked to create a new FA. Staff A stated the last FA was reviewed 08/08/2023 and was past the required annual review. REFERENCE: WAC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-04 · tag F0843 — widespread
    Have an agreement with at least one or more hospitals certified by Medicare or Medicaid to make sure residents can be moved quickly to the hospital when they need medical care.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a written transfer agreement with at least one area hospital approved for participation with Medicare/Medicaid programs. This failure placed all residents at risk for delayed transfer and potential lack of access to care, services, and the hospital in the event of an emergency. Findings included . In an interview on 09/26/2023 at 11:14 AM, Staff C (Operations Manager) was asked to provide the facility transfer agreement. Staff C was unable to provide a transfer agreement with a local hospital or another facility. In an interview on 09/27/2023 at 11:21 AM, Staff A (Administrator) confirmed the facility did not have a transfer agreement with a local hospital. REFERENCE: WAC 388-97-1620(6)(a).

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain an ongoing, effective, comprehensive, data-driven Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that focused on the full range of care and services provided by the facility that included clinical care, quality of life and resident choice. The facility failed to demonstrate evidence of an ongoing QAPI program that was completed on at least a quarterly basis, was documented, included systems and reports demonstrating systematic identification, reporting, investigation, analysis, and prevention of adverse events; and documentation demonstrating the development, implementation, and evaluation of corrective actions or performance improvement activities. Findings included . A review of the facility 2022-2023 QAPI binder showed one QAPI meeting was held on 04/13/2023 and one meeting held on 10/28/2022. There were no QAPI meetings held in Quarter 1 or Quarter 3 of 2023. On 09/26/2023 at 3:56 PM Staff B provided an 08/22/2023 QAPI agenda and meeting notes. There were no identified participants in the notes.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-04 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to designate a qualified Infection Preventionist (IP) to oversee the facility's infection prevention and control program. The failure to designate a qualified staff to facilitate an effective infection control program including monitoring for, assessing, implementing transmission-based precautions, and acting on resident infections upon occurrence and failure to ensure antibiotics were used appropriately, placed all residents at risk for infections, inappropriate treatment, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . In an interview on 09/26/2023 at 1:50 PM, Staff C (Operations Manager) stated the facility does not have an infection control preventionist and the position was posted for hire. In an interview on 09/27/2023 at 4:15 PM, Staff C was asked which staff was monitoring resident infections and antibiotic use. Staff C stated there was no staff designated to provide oversight of new infections or new orders for antibiotics. Staff C stated there were no monthly reports to provide showing infection surveillance or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-10-04 · tag F0940 — failed to train staff — widespread
    Develop, implement, and/or maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff members.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop, implement, and maintain an effective training program for all new and existing staff consistent with their expected roles and based on the Facility Assessment. The failure to provide mandated annual training for 2 of 2 staff (Staff K Licensed Practical Nurse and Staff J Certified Nursing Assistant) employed over one year at the facility placed residents at risk of receiving care from untrained staff. Findings included . Review of the 09/26/2023 staff list with date of hire showed Staff J was a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) hired on 05/04/2022. The staff list showed Staff K was a Licensed Practical Nurse hired on 05/06/2022. Review of the daily staff schedule for 09/01/2023 thru 09/25/2023 showed Staff J worked 13/26 days and Staff K worked 20/26 days. In an interview on 09/26/2023 at 4:42 PM, Staff C (Operations Manager) reviewed the staff files for Staff J and Staff K and confirmed there were no annual training documents in the files. Staff C stated the staff development nurse left and no annual training…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure alleged abuse or neglect the facility was aware of or witnessed, was thoroughly investigated for 4 of 15 residents (Residents 1, 2, 9, & 18 ) reviewed for abuse and neglect, and failed to log, report, and thoroughly investigate two falls for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 3) reviewed for falls. These failures placed all residents at risk for unidentified abuse and/or neglect and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation, dated 04/27/2023, showed all alleged violations (a situation or occurrence that is observed or reported by staff, resident, visitor, or others) of abuse or neglect would be reported to the administrator, state agency, and all required agencies within the required timeframe's. An immediate investigation was warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect, or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occurred. The facility would make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 (Residents 16, 3, 17 ) residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (PU, injury to the skin and underlying tissue due to prolonged pressure), received necessary care and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, and prevent new ulcers from developing. Failure to timely monitor, assess, and implement preventative skin measures placed all resident's at risk for deterioration in skin condition, pain, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the undated facility, Pressure Injury Prevention and Management policy, showed the facility would utilize a systematic approach for pressure injury prevention and management, including prompt assessment and treatment; intervening to stabilize, reduce or remove the underlying risk factors; monitoring the impact of the interventions; and modifying interventions as needed. Licensed Nurses would perform a pressure injury risk assessment, after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-04 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff was competent and had the skill sets to care for residents' needs as identified through assessment and described in the care plan. The facility failed to ensure nursing staff competency for 5 of 5 Staff (Staff F RN-Registered Nurse, Staff G NA-Nurse Aide, Staff H LPN- Licensed Practical Nurse, Staff J NA, Staff K LPN) Nurse Aides (NA) demonstrated competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for resident needs as described in the residents' care plan. The failure to evaluate nurse competency for 3 of 3 nurses and 2 of 2 NAs placed residents at risk for unmet needs, unsafe care, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . The 2022 Facility Assessment FA with a review date of 08/08/2022 showed the facility identified Staff Competencies required in basic ADL [Activities of Daily Living] care, safety and other emergencies, care for residents with contracture, communication, resident rights and facility responsibilities, abuse prevention, infection control, culture change, identification of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-04 · tag F0729 — pattern
    Verify that a nurse aide has been trained; and if they haven't worked as a nurse aide for 2 years, receive retraining.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to verify nursing assistants met competency evaluation requirements before allowing an individual to serve as a nurse aide. The failure to verify 2 of 2 staff (Staff G and J) for nursing aide competency on the State Agency registry placed residents at risk for incompetent care, unmet needs, and possible injury during care. Findings included . Review of the 09/26/2023 staff list with date of hire showed Staff G was a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) hired on 08/08/2023. The staff list showed Staff J was a CNA hired on 05/04/2023. Review of the 09/26/2023 daily nurse schedule showed Staff G and Staff J were both scheduled to work on 09/26/2023. Review of the daily staff schedule for 09/01/2023 thru 09/25/2023 showed Staff G worked 11 days and Staff J worked 13 days. In an interview on 09/26/2023 at 3:47 PM, Staff C (Operations Manager) stated the staff development nurse left employment and no State Registry verification documents could be located at the facility or at the corporate office. In an interview 09/27/2023 at 4:42 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-04 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to adequately monitor target behaviors, implement non-pharmacological interventions and assess the interventions effectiveness before increasing psychotropic medications for 3 of 3 residents (Resident 1, 15, & 9) reviewed for accidents and supervision. These failures placed residents at risk for unnecessary psychotropic medications, injuries from falls, unmet needs, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . According to the undated facility, Use of Psychotropic Medication, policy showed residents were not given psychotropic drugs unless the medication was necessary to treat a specific condition, as diagnosed and documented in the residents medical record, and the medication was beneficial to the resident, as demonstrated by monitoring and documenting the resident's response to the medication. For psychotropic medications that were initiated after admission to the facility, documentation would include the specific condition as diagnosed by the physician, and would only be initiated after medical,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-04 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement a system to ensure 1 of 2 (Staff J) Nursing Aides (NA) received required training for continued competency that is no less than 12 hours per year. The failure to have a system in place to provide mandatory training in dementia management, abuse prevention, and other areas of resident special needs placed residents at risk for abuse, neglect, emotional distress, and physical injury. Findings included . In an interview and record review on 09/26/2023 at 4:42 PM, Staff C (Operations Manager) reviewed the personnel file for Staff J and found no training documents of any training received after Staff J's hire date on 05/04/2022. Staff C stated there are change of shift meetings with all staff scheduled to work where abuse prevention is discussed, but there is no staff sign sheet or tracking methods to ensure staff received training. Staff C stated since there was not a staff development nurse, there is no one tracking NA continuing education or providing annual training on the mandatory topics or the topics related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards of food service safety. Facility failure to ensure cold foods were stored appropriately; ensure adequate separation of clean and dirty processes; ensure sanitizing solution was tested and replaced as required; and ensure kitchen fans were clean left residents at risk for less than palatable food and foodborne illness. Findings included . Facility Policies According to the facility's revised April 2019 Food Preparation and Service Policy the area for cleaning dishes should be separate from the food service line in order to ensure a sanitary food service; work surfaces should be cleaned and sanitized according to food code guidelines. According to the facility's 2001 Sanitization Policy, revised 2008, Quaternary Ammonium Compound (quat) sanitizer must be used at a concentration of 150-200 ppm (parts per million), and that the solution must be replaced at least once per shift and when the solution is visibly soiled or cloudy.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement plan to ensure repeated and/or systemic deficiencies were analyzed and corrected. The facility failed to conduct a thorough analysis of quality assurance data, develop interventions, analyze interventions, and determine if the desired improvement was achieved/sustained. These failures placed all residents at risk for deficiencies in quality of care, quality of life, and resident safety. Findings include . Facility policy According to the facility's February 2020 Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program policy, the objective of the QAPI program was to provide a means to establish and implement performance improvement projects to correct identified negative or problematic indicators. The policy showed the QAPI plan should describe the process for identifying and correcting quality deficiencies. The policy showed the QAPI committee should meet monthly to review reports, evaluate data, monitor QAPI-related activities, and adjust the plan. The QAPI…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases, including Covid-19 (a highly transmissible infectious virus that causes respiratory illness and in severe cases can cause difficulty breathing and could result in impairment or death) and other infections during a global pandemic. The facility failed to report a Covid 19 outbreak (1 Resident with Covid 19 acquired at the facility) to the required entity and respond to the Covid 19 outbreak in accordance with the Local Health Jurisdiction (LHJ) recommendations; to discontinue Transmission Based Precautions (TBP) in accordance of the LHJ or Centers for Disease Control (CDC) recommendations for 1 of 1 (Resident 111); to implement and adhere to Aerosol Generating Procedures (AGP) for 4 of 4 Residents (27, 4, 53 & 3); to ensure staff used Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and performed hand hygiene (HH) as required to prevent the spread…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-08-12 · tag F0887 — widespread
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement policies and procedures to ensure residents' and staff who refused to take the COVID-19 vaccine were informed of the risks and benefits of not receiving the vaccine, had the ability to ask and have questions answered. and failed to implement a system to document that information. This failure prevented residents and staff from making an informed decision with all needed information about receiving or declining the COVID-19 vaccine, including the risks and benefits. Findings included . Review of an undated facility Covid-19 Vaccine Mandate Policy and Procedure showed all staff must be fully vaccinated against Covid-19 by October 18, 2021, and any staff member not vaccinated must submit an exemption form for official review. Unvaccinated and exempted staff must wear an N-95 respirator while in the facility, test more frequently (3 times per week) and would receive more regular infection control training regarding social distancing and handwashing. The Covid-19 policy did not address the procedure for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide care and services that ensured privacy in a manner that maintained and promoted resident rights and resident dignity for 4 (Residents 37, 50, 111 & 43) of 18 sample residents. Facility failure to provide a dignified dining experience, ensure personal privacy was maintained, safeguard personal belongings, or determine a resident's capacity to make decisions placed residents at risk for undesired medical care, feelings of institutionalization, embarrassment, frustration, disrespect, and diminished self-worth. Findings included . Resident 37 According to the 07/04/2022 Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool) Resident 37 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was assessed to be severely cognitively impaired. The MDS showed Resident 37 had diagnoses including Dementia and Stroke. A 09/28/2021 nursing Medicare meeting note showed Resident 37 had encephalopathy (a disease of brain function causing confusion and an altered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate injuries and accidents for 4 (Residents 55, 43, 50, & 37) of 10 sample residents and 2 supplemental residents (Residents 56 & 30). Failure to thoroughly investigate incidents, detracted from the facility's ability to prevent repeated incidents, injuries, and potential abuse/neglect. Findings included . Facility Policy According to the facility's Abuse Investigating and Reporting policy revised July 2017, All reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state, and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported. Resident 55 According to the 07/31/2022 Quarterly MDS Resident 55 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including a history of falls, obesity, tremor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-12 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately assess 5 (Residents 43, 52, 27, 57 & 9) of 18 sample residents and 1 (Resident 24) supplemental resident reviewed for accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool). Failure to ensure accurate assessments placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet needs. Findings included . Resident 43 Review of the 07/14/2022 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS an assessment tool) showed Resident 43 admitted to the facility on [DATE], was cognitively intact, and had diagnoses including bipolar disorder, fractures, multiple traumas, and required aftercare following an orthopedic (bone) surgery. The MDS assessed the resident to have no verbal behaviors (threatening, cursing, screaming) directed towards others but did reject care four to six days of the lookback period. The MDS identified Resident 43's behavior worsened since the previous assessment. Review of the previous MDS, a 04/13/2022 Medicare 5-Day assessment, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-12 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessments accurately reflected resident's condition for 4 of 5 residents (Residents 37, 30, 43 & 52) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The failure to ensure PASRR assessments were accurate placed residents at risk for inappropriate placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health care needs. Findings included . Resident 30 According to the 06/24/2022 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS an assessment tool), Resident 30 had severe cognitive impairment with multiple medically complex diagnoses including Traumatic Brain Injury, Alzheimer's Disease, anxiety disorder, and depression. This MDS showed Resident 30 received antipsychotic (AP) and antidepressant (AD) medications daily. Review of a 06/22/2022 Level 1 PASRR for Resident 30 showed staff identified the resident with serious mental illness indicators that included a mood disorder, anxiety, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing services were provided within professional standards of nursing for 7 (Residents 45, 43, 37, 50, 30, 27 & 9) of 18 sample residents reviewed. Failure to assess and acquire an order for adaptive eqiuipment (Resident 45), clarify physician's orders (POs - Residents 45 & 43), provide bowel care according to the facility's bowel protocol (Residents 37 & 50), administer medications as ordered (Residents 30, 27 &9), clarify intravenous (IV) orders (Resident 43) left residents at risk for unmet care needs and diminished qaulity of life. Findings included . Scoop Mattress Resident 45 According to the 07/15/2022 Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool) Resident 45 had diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease, Stroke, vertigo, a history of falling and Non-Alzheimer's Dementia. The MDS showed Resident 45 did not have Shortness of Breath (SOB). The MDS showed Resident 45 showed signs of pain daily including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-12 · tag F0660 — pattern
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge (DC) planning process for 1 of 1 resident (Residents 158) reviewed for discharges from a complaint investigation and 4 supplemental residents (Residents 160, 159, 20 & 4). The failure to identify discharge needs, establish wound care services, and document referrals to local contact agencies when DC to the community for Residents 158 & 160 placed these residents at risk for unmet needs and rehospitalization. The failure to ensure a DC care plan (CP) was developed in collaboration with the resident and/or the resident representative and perform/document regular re-evaluation of resident's DC plan for Residents 20, 4, & 159 placed them at risk for emotional distress and unnecessary institutionalization. Findings included . Resident 158 The 05/25/2022 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) showed no DC plan was developed for Resident 158 to return to the community. The 05/25/2022 Care Area Assessment (CAA, a care planning tool) showed no planning for Resident 158 to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 2 (Residents 111 & 13) of 4 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (PUs) received the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice and/or had appropriate and timely interventions in place based on individual risks, to promote healing of existing pressure injuries and prevent new pressure injuries from developing. These failures left residents at risk for avoidable PUs, extended healing duration and discomfort. Findings included . The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) Pressure Injury (Ulcer) definition and stages include: A pressure injury is localized damage to the skin and/or underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence or related to a medical or other device. The injury can present as intact skin or an open ulcer and may be painful. The injury occurs as a result of intense and/or prolonged pressure or pressure in combination with shear (shifting, dragging). The tolerance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-12 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 3 (Resident 11, 111 & 38) of 7 residents reviewed for nutrition maintained acceptable parameters of nutritional status. Failure to ensure consistent, timely weights, identify significant weight changes, and notify interested parties placed the residents at risk for delayed identification of interventions for continued weight loss. Findings included . Review of a 12/27/2021 facility Weight Assessment and Intervention policy, showed nursing staff would obtain weights on admission, daily for the first three days after admission, and at least bi-monthly thereafter. This policy indicated any weight change of five pounds (lbs) for residents that weigh 100 lbs or greater and 3 lbs for residents who weigh less than 100 lbs since the last weight assessment would be reweighed the next day for confirmation. If the weight loss was verified, nursing would contact the Registered Dietician (RD) and provider. The policy stated weights would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient and competent nursing staff to provide and supervise care as evidenced by 7 resident interviews and 4 staff interviews. The facility had insufficient staff to provide supervision to ensure residents received assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) including showers and restorative services, received supervision to prevent accidents/hazards, received timely call light response in accordance with established clinical standards, care plans, and preferences. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and negative outcomes. Findings included . The Facility Assessment (FA), undated, showed required nursing staff was based on patient census and level of care needs using the nationally established standards on the CMS (Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services) Five-Star Rating. The FA showed the facility established a staffing plan to meet the regulation (of Washington State) of 3.4 nursing hours per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-12 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure nursing staff (nurses and nurse aides) had the appropriate competencies and skills sets to provide nursing and related services to assure resident safety and attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, as determined by resident assessments and individual care plans (CP) and considering the number, acuity and diagnoses of the facility's resident population, and in accordance with the facility assessment. The failure to assess staffs' competency on hire, failure to provide orientation to agency staff and failure to verify nursing staff licensure and certification placed residents at risk for unsafe, substandard quality of care and unmet needs. Findings included . Abuse & Neglect Training In an interview on 08/11/2022 at 9:55 AM, Staff II (Receptionist/Nurse Aide in Training) stated they worked at the facility since 2018. Staff II stated they did not know what a mandated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medication regimens were free of unnecessary medications for 7 (Residents 24, 43, 52, 37, 45, 57 & 30) of 8 residents reviewed. Failure to ensure residents were free from unnecessary medications, had behavior monitoring, provided informed consent, and completed Gradual Dose Reductions (GDR) left residents at risk for unnecessary medications and negative health outcomes. Findings included . Facility Policy According to the facility's undated Antipsychotic Medication Use Policy residents should only receive antipsychotic (AP) medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and effective. The policy stated informed consent must be obtained and the physician notified if a resident or their representative did not consent to a medication. The policy stated diagnosis of a specific condition/diagnosis for which an AP medication was required in order to provide AP medications. The policy stated diagnoses…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-08-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program that included developing an antibiotic (ABO) stewardship program to promote appropriate use of antibiotics, failed to analyze and complete monthly surveillance effectively for 6 of 6 months (February 2022-July 2022) reviewed, and reduce the risk of unnecessary antibiotic use for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 43, 99 & 20) reviewed for unnecessary antibiotics, and failed to have an effective Infection Control Committee to meet regularly and analyze/review Antibiotic usage in the facility. This failure placed residents at risk for potential adverse outcomes associated with the inappropriate/unnecessary use of antibiotics and an increased risk for multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO: microscopic organisms that are resistant to many antibiotics). Findings included . Review of a 12/2016 facility Antibiotic Stewardship- Review and Surveillance of Antibiotic Use and Outcomes policy showed ABO usage and outcome data would be collected and documented using a facility- approved ABO…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-12 · tag F0885 — failed to notify residents/families about COVID-19 — pattern
    Report COVID19 data to residents and families.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide notification of COVID-19 infections for 2 (Residents 50 & 45) of 3 residents and/or representatives reviewed for notification. COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by a novel virus with respiratory illness symptoms including cough, fever, new or worsening malaise, headache, or new dizziness, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, loss of taste or smell, and in severe cases difficulty breathing that could result in severe impairment or death. This failure placed the Residents and their Representatives at risk of not being fully informed of COVID-19 activity in the facility. This deficiency occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings included . Review of the 05/2020 Coronavirus Disease (Covid-19) Reporting Facility Data to Residents and Families policy showed residents and families would be notified for a single confirmed case of Covid-19 no later than 5:00 PM the next day after the positive Covid case was confirmed. Review of resident records showed an 08/02/2022 progress note that residents and/or resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-08-12 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — pattern
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure employees, including contracted staff, were tested for COVID-19 (a highly transmissible infectious virus that causes respiratory illness and in severe cases can cause difficulty breathing that could result in impairment or death) according to the frequency recommended by the Local Health Jurisdiction (LHJ) and required based on the county positivity rate during a COVID-19 outbreak for staff COVID-19 testing. The facility failed to ensure COVID-19 testing was documented as completed and/or the results of that testing was documented in the residents' records for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 30, 43, 38 & 111) reviewed for documentation of COVID-19 testing. Additionally, the facility failed to conduct COVID-19 testing while maintaining proper infection control measures to reduce the potential for the spread of COVID-19, during a facility COVID-19 outbreak. This failure placed residents, staff, and visitors at risk for transmission of COVID-19 in the facility. Findings included . Review of an undated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain and/or offer to assist to formulate Advanced Directives (AD) and/or Power of Attorney (POA) documentation for 4 (Residents 9, 37, 11 & 20) of 18 residents reviewed. This failure left residents at risk for losing the right to have their preferences and choices honored with regard to emergent and end-of-life care. Findings included . According to facility's December 2016 Advance Directives policy an AD is a written instruction, such as a living will or Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) for health care, recognized by State law, relating to the provisions of health care when an individual is incapacitated. The policy stated information about whether or not the resident had executed an AD should be displayed prominently in the medical record and the plan of care for each resident, and would be consistent with their documented treatment preferences and/or AD. The facility's undated admission Agreement included an AD Acknowledgment form that had five…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Care Plans (CPs) were implemented and updated for 4 (Residents 45, 30, 57 & 55) of 18 sample residents reviewed. Failure to implement and individualize CPs, and failure to include residents in their care planning process left residents at risk for unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 45 According to the 07/15/2022 Significant Change MDS (Minimum Data Set - an assessment tool) Resident 45 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Alzheimer's Disease and Non-Alzheimer's Dementia. The MDS showed Resident 45 was severely cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance with most care. According to the 01/28/2022 Admissions MDS Resident 45 was assessed to have Alzheimer's Disease and Non-Alzheimer's Dementia at the time of admission. Review of Resident 45's Comprehensive Care Plan (CP) showed an 08/08/2022 Resident has impaired cognitive function/impaired thought…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff to meet their Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) needs, were consistently provided necessary assistance for 3 (Residents 45, 24 & 52) 18 sample residents reviewed. Failure to provide assistance to residents who were dependent on staff for nail care (Resident 45 & 24), dressing (Resident 24), bathing (Resident 52), and oral hygiene (Residents 52) placed residents at risk for unmet needs, poor hygiene, embarrassment, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to an undated facility ADL, Supporting policy, the residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently would receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene. This policy stated interventions to improve or minimize a resident's functional abilities will be in accordance with the resident's assessed needs, preferences, stated goals and recognized standards of practice. Resident 24 According to the 06/11/2022 Annual MDS (Minimum Data Set - an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide restorative nursing services to 3 (Residents 20, 43 & 55) of 18 sample residents. Facility failure to . left residents at risk for . and . Findings included . According to the 07/2017 facility's Restorative Nursing Services policy, Restorative goals and objectives should be individualized and resident-centered, and outlined in the resident's plan of care. Resident 20 According to the 05/17/2022 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS an assessment tool) Resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Stroke, Dementia, and Ileus (a blockage of the intestines). The MDS showed Resident 20 did not walk in their room or in the hallway during the lookback period, had a functional limitation to their Range of Motion (ROM) in one leg and used a wheelchair for mobility. The MDS showed Resident 20 received Occupational Therapy (OT) from 03/22/2022 through 04/26/2022 and did not receive Restorative Services. The 04/26/2022 OT…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident environment was free from hazards for 2 (Residents 50 & 52) of 18 sample residents and failed to ensure 1 of 2 shower rooms remained secure when not in use. These failures left residents at risk for accidents and injury. Findings included . Resident 50 The 07/22/2022 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) showed Resident 50 had a diagnosis of dementia. Resident 50 was assessed to required extensive assistance from one staff person with transfers and mobility using a wheelchair. The MDS showed Resident 50 had wandering behaviors that affected other residents and had two prior falls. A 03/09/2022 Care Plan (CP) showed Resident 50 was a wanderer, aimlessly wandering, goes into other resident rooms, gets into beds not assigned to them related to lack of safety awareness and impaired memory. Staff interventions included distracting the resident from wandering by providing diversion, activities, food,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: provide medically related social services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 (Resident 20 & 43) of 18 residents reviewed; determine why residents demonstrated a pattern of refusals for care and services for 2 (Residents 43 & 30) of 18 sample residents reviewed; and failed to document and resolve for residents who had grievances about missing items for 2 (Residents 111 & 43) of 18 sample residents reviewed. These failures placed the residents at risk for frustration, diminished quality of life, and unmet or unidentified care needs. Findings Included . Facility Policy According to the facility's revised October 2010 Social Services policy, the Director of Social Services was responsible for assisting in meeting the social and emotional needs of the residents and maintaining a record system for social service data. The policy showed the Director of Social Services was responsible for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent (%). During observations of 25 opportunities for error, 2 of 2 licensed nurses made 2 errors and 1 Medication Tech (MT) made 1 error which amounted to a total error rate of 12%. This placed residents at risk for side effects and/or reduced medication effectiveness due to improper administration. Findings included . The April 2021 facility policy for Administering Medications, showed staff should check the label three times to verify the right medication and the right dosage. This policy directed staff to check the expiration/beyond use date on the medication label prior to administering. Resident 27 On 08/10/2022 at 8:20 AM, Staff S (Licensed Practical Nurse), was observed to dispense 20 mg (milligrams) of an Over The Counter (OTC) antacid and administer to Resident 27. Review of Resident 27's Physician Orders (PO) read Omeprazole-Soduim Bicarbonate Packet 40-160 mg, a prescription antacid medication. On 08/11/2022 at 10:19 AM, when asked if the correct…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were secured and dated when opened, and expired medications and biologicals were disposed of timely in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 3 medication carts, and 1 of 1 medication rooms reviewed, and leaving medication in residents' rooms. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving expired medications, medication errors, and non-assessed, self-administration of medications by residents. Findings included . According to the facility's revised April 2019 Storage of Medications policy, nursing staff was responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. This policy stated drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in locked compartments and any discontinued or outdated drugs or biologicals were returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. Medications at Bedside Resident 43 Observation on 08/08/2022 at 10:35 AM showed Resident 43 with a small medicine cup full of pills (their morning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-08-12 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt dental services were provided for 2 (Resident 39 & 24) of 4 sample residents and 1 supplemental resident (Resident 43) reviewed for dental services. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet dental needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of an undated facility Dental Services policy showed routine, and emergency dental services were available to meet the resident's oral health services in accordance with the resident's assessment and plan of care. Resident 39 According to the 07/08/2022 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 39 had diagnoses including Stroke, a Seizure Disorder and a pervasive developmental disorder, and required extensive assistance with personal hygiene. The MDS showed Resident 39 had an obvious or likely cavity or broken natural teeth. Observation on 08/08/2022 at 5:26 AM showed several of Resident 39's teeth were blackened, rotten and broken.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-08-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure resident's records were complete, accurate, and readily accessible for 10 (Residents 11, 24, 30, 8, 52, 37, 50, 30, 43 & 56) of 18 residents whose records were reviewed. The failure to monitor, identify and correct missed documentation by nurse aides in areas of Activities of Daily Living (ADL), nutritional intake, and the failure to obtain records from outside providers detracted the nurses from monitoring resident care and identifying/implementing interventions for resident needs, which left residents at risk for inaccurate assessments, poor coordination of care and unmet needs. Findings included . Nutritional Intake Resident 11 Review of Resident 11's June 2022 nutritional intake documentation showed, staff failed to document the resident's meal intake for 22 of the 90 meals provided. July 2022 records showed 32 of the 93 meals were not documented and August 2022 nutritional intake records showed 22 of the 33 meals had no documentation of Resident 11's meal intake. Resident 24 Review of Resident 24's June 2022…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Bcited before2023-12-12 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the posted daily nurse staffing information included the total number and actual hours worked by registered and licensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift for 21 of 30 days (11/16/2023 - 12/07/2023) reviewed for posted nurse staffing information. The failure to post a complete and accurate form on a daily basis that showed the nursing staff working prevented the residents, family members, and visitors from exercising their rights to know the actual numbers of available nursing staff in the facility. Findings included . Review of the facility's daily direct-care nursing staff postings provided by Staff J (Regional Nurse) on 12/08/2023 showed the postings from 11/16/2023 through 12/07/2023 was incomplete and did not meet the regulatory requirement to indicate the total number of staff and the actual hours worked. In an interview on 12/11/2023 at 6:42 AM, Staff J stated it was important for the daily nursing staff posting to be complete and accurate so that residents and their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$206,072 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $143,754 — penalty dated 2023-12-12
  • $62,318 — penalty dated 2023-10-04
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-12 for 10 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
FOUNDATION HEALTHCARE SERVICES LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 05/01/2021
FROST, STEVENIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2021
LINDAHL, JEFFREYIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
LINDAHL, KIRKMANIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
LINDAHL, SCOTTIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
FOUNDATION RESOURCE CENTER LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/08/2025
ANDERSON, BRANDTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/01/2019
DE ORO, BRIANNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/24/2025
DE ORO, THOMASIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/24/2024
HINGA, MARJORIEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/24/2023
KUMARI, MONIKAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021
NESTERENKO, OKSANAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
PADUA, SARAHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2024
ZWAHLEN, JAYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
WA3WEST, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 05/05/2021
LINDAHL, DAVIDIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$397K
Related-party expense4% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 73%Medicare 15%Other / private 12%

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $397K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$444per resident / day
operating cost
$13,511per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$388per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505339. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next