Washington Soldiers Home

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 97 beds and averages 89.2 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.27 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.77 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.79 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.47 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-08-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address identified risk factors for the development of pressure ulcers and implement preventative interventions timely for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 3) reviewed for pressure related wounds. Resident 3 experienced harm when they developed two facility acquired pressure injuries after identified pressure prevention strategies, air mattress and heel protection boots, were not implemented timely as recommended. This failure placed residents at risk of development for pressure injury, medical complications, and diminished quality of life.Findings included . The National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP) describes/defines a suspected deep tissue injury as: Intact or non-intact skin with localized area of persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, purple discoloration due to damage of underlying soft tissue. This injury can result from prolonged pressure and may either resolve or develop into further tissue loss. Review of the facility's policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-08-29 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure podiatry (the treatment of feet and their ailments) care and services were provided timely to avoid podiatric complications in residents with diabetes (elevated blood sugar) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 39) reviewed for foot care. Resident 39 experienced harm when they developed an avoidable foot wound and pain due to wearing ill-fitting shoes that prevented the resident from participating in therapy resulting in a decrease in strength from baseline and a slight functional decline when there was a delay in scheduling a podiatric shoe fitting. This failure placed residents at risk of discomfort, reduced ambulation and reduced participation in activities of daily life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 39 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included quadriplegia (medical condition characterized by the complete or partial loss of motor function in all four limbs [arms and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ddisputed · IDR2026-05-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure freedom from abuse, during a resident-to-resident altercation, for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for resident abuse. This failure placed the residents at risk for injury, psychological harm, diminished feelings of safety and security, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included. Review of the electronic health record on 05/19/2026 showed that Resident 2 admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had diagnoses to include dementia/cognitive decline, stroke with left-sided weakness. Resident 2 was able to make need known, and required minimal to moderate assistance with activities of daily living. Review of the facility incident report dated 05/06/2026 showed that Resident 2 was in the dining room and had moved another resident's (Resident 1) name plate to a different location in the dining room as a joke. When Resident 1 entered the dining room, they sat at the new assigned seat, but staff tried to advocate for Resident 1 and told…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have psychotropic medication (medications that affect a person's mental state) informed consents accurately completed prior to administering the medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 8) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. This failure placed the resident and/or their legal representatives at risk for lack of knowledge to make an informed decision regarding the use of the medications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 8 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and was able to make needs known. The quarterly minimum data set (MDS, assessment tool) dated 08/06/2025 showed Resident 8 had diagnoses to include schizoaffective disorder (a mental health condition that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly), bipolar disorder (episodes of mood swings ranging from depressive lows to manic highs), anxiety disorder, depression, psychotic disorder (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal privacy was protected for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 50) when reviewed for resident rights. This failure placed the resident at risk for embarrassment, a violation of their privacy, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 50 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included high blood pressure, diabetes (too much sugar in the blood) and dementia (a decline in mental ability that interferes with daily life). Resident 50 was able to make needs known. Observation on 08/22/2025 at 9:27 AM showed a Monitoring in Progress sign on the exterior of Resident 50's room door. Review of Resident 50's EHR showed no documentation of consent to the recording device in their room. During an interview on 08/25/2025 at 10:57 AM, Staff J, Registered Nurse/Resident Care Manager (RN/RCM), stated Resident 50's roommate used an [NAME] (a smart device…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary and homelike environment for 1 of 4 halls (100 hall) when reviewed for environment. Failure to ensure Resident 19's wheelchair left armrest was in good repair placed the resident at risk for unsanitary conditions and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Review of the electronic health records (EHR) showed the Resident 19 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include stroke (blood supply to a part of the brain is suddenly cut off), hemiplegia (total or partial inability to move one side of the body) affecting the right side of the body, and utilized a wheelchair for mobility. Resident 19 was able to make needs known. Multiple observations on 08/21/2025 at 12:27 PM, 08/22/2025 at 12:48 PM, 08/25/2025 at 10:03 AM, 08/26/2025 at 10:56 AM, and 08/27/2025 at 12:54 PM showed Resident 19's wheelchair left armrest's black vinyl covering missing/torn off towards the back of the armrest with exposed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written bed hold notice at the time of transfer to the hospital for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 93 and 5) when reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk for lacking knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed while in the hospital and diminished quality of life.Findings included . Resident 93 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 93 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic pain, anxiety (emotional state characterized by feelings of fear or worry) and diabetes (too much sugar in the blood). Resident 50 was able to make needs known. Review of Resident 93's EHR showed hospitalization on 06/01/2025 and there was no documentation the resident or resident representative was provided with written copies of the bed hold notice or transfer form. During an interview on 08/26/2025 at 1:30 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services (DNS), stated residents were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool) accurately reflected the status for 3 of 19 sampled residents (Residents 6, 5, and 1) when reviewed for accuracy of assessments. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, inaccurate medical record information, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Resident 1 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (paralysis that affects only one side of the body after blood flow to the brain was interrupted), heart failure, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing food or liquids) and dementia (thinking and social symptoms that interferes with daily functioning). Resident 1 was able to communicate their needs. During an observation and interview on 08/21/2025 at 12:24 PM, Resident 1 sat on their bed with an uneaten lunch tray in front of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to screen for mental health services on admission for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident 30) when reviewed for Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASSAR, a mental health services screening tool). This failure placed the resident at risk for lack of mental health support, increase in adverse behaviors, decrease in mood, and diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the electronic health record showed Resident 30 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include anxiety disorder, diabetes, and chronic kidney disease. The resident was able to make needs known. Review of the PASSAR level one, dated 05/09/2025, showed the Resident 30 required a level two PASSAR assessment. Review of the care plan, initiated 04/18/2025, showed Resident 30 had a level one PASSAR and a level two PASSAR was requested on 05/09/2025. During an interview on 08/27/2025 at 11:51 AM, Staff M, Social Worker, stated residents who admitted from the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure license nurses followed orders for applying a splint (device used to immobilize or stabilize a joint or protected body part) and prevalon boots (boots used to relieve pressure on heels) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1) when reviewed for positioning. This failure placed the resident at risk for worsening mobility, medical complications, and diminished quality of life.Finding Included.Review of the EHR showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (paralysis that affects only one side of the body after blood flow to the brain was interrupted), heart failure, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing food or liquids) and dementia (thinking and social symptoms that interfered with daily functioning). Resident 1 was able to communicate their needs. Observation on 08/21/2025 at 11:28 AM showed Resident 1 laid in bed with no boots or splint on.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and services to increase and/or prevent further decline for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 39) reviewed for limited range of motion (ROM). This failure placed residents at risk for a functional decline, increased dependence on staff, and diminished quality of life.Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 39 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included quadriplegia (medical condition characterized by the complete or partial loss of motor function in all four limbs [arms and legs]), diabetes (too much sugar in the blood), and kidney disease (impaired kidney function). Resident 39 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 08/21/2025 at 10:01 AM, Resident 39 stated they had not participated in restorative because they had been waiting for wider shoes to be ordered. Resident 39 stated they felt increased weakness in their legs and could not recall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor and accurately document fluid restrictions or failed to follow up on a speech therapy referral for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 2 and 3) when reviewed for nutrition and/or dialysis.These failures placed residents at potential risk for medical complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 2 Review of the electronic health records (EHR) showed Resident 2 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include kidney failure with dependence on dialysis (the process of removing waste products and excess fluid from the blood due to kidney failure), diabetes (too much sugar in the blood), and heart failure. Resident 2 was able to make needs known. During an interview and observation on 08/25/2025 at 1:01 PM, Resident 2 stated they used to be on a fluid restriction but was no longer on a fluid restriction. There was a sign on the wall that showed, No Water Pitcher Fluid Restriction and Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$10,358 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-08-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 11 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA