No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Martha And Mary Health Service

19160 Front Street Northeast, Poulsbo, WA 98370 · Non profit - Corporation · 135 certified beds · (360) 779-7500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (360) 779-7500 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0604, F0609) — most recent Apr 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (36% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
19379 7th Ave NE · (360) 394-1000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
325 NE Hostmark St · (360) 779-6849 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
18882 Front St NE · (888) 728-0837 · Call to confirm hours
Park
19265 Front St NE · (360) 779-3901 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.3%14.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.3%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms40.2%17.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.5%0.1%0.1%worse
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.1%2.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened13.0%17.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.9%12.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.5%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control26.5%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.8%15.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.0%1.3%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine87.7%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.4%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.8%13.4%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.861.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.311.521.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

55.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 121 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

55.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
76.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.08hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 76.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 69 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF55.4%CMS range 46.9–64.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.1%CMS range 6.5–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge76.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge75.4%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge72.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.8%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.5–10.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.821.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.11
RN hours/ resident / day
0.62
LPN hours/ resident / day
3.04
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.77
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.74
RN hoursweekends
35.9%
Total nursing turnover
22.6%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 135 beds and averages 110.9 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.77 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.11 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.04 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.05 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.06 on weekdays — 20% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.26 to 0.74 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-13)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-16)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor and document a controlled fall timely for 1 of 3 (Resident 1) residents reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed residents at risk of delayed medical intervention and pain.Findings included.Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of heart disease and arthritis. The annual Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 02/25/2026, showed Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment.Resident 1's fall risk care plan, dated 02/24/2025, showed Resident 1 was at high risk of falls and had limited physical mobility.On 05/07/2026 at 1:01 PM, Collateral Contact 1 (CC1), said they had visited Resident 1 on Monday, 04/27/2026. CC1 said during the visit Resident 1 complained that their wrist hurt and they had sore foot. CC1 said Resident 1's roommate said Resident 1 had fallen. CC1 said the staff had not contacted them and they had to bring it to the attention of the nurse. CC1 said they were very concerned they were not contacted about the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the state agency timely for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse. This failure placed residents at risk of abuse, fear and delayed investigation.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect Protocol, revised July 2024, showed that the following definitions of abuse are sexual abuse is defined as but is not limited to, sexual coercion or sexual assault, and an incident or suspected incident of resident abuse be reported immediately, but not later than two hours after allegation is made if the events involve abuse.Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment, an assessment tool, dated 12/23/2025, showed Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene.Resident 1's progress notes dated 03/07/2026, showed Resident 1 verbalized to an aide that a person inserted a finger into their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate the bowel protocol and accurately document bowel protocol interventions for 4 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 12, 8, 58 & 63) reviewed for bowel care. The failure to initiate and document bowel care, placed residents at risk for pain/discomfort, unmet care needs and other potentially negative health outcomes.Findings included . Review of facility policy titled, Bowel Management, dated January 2024, documented, If no BM [bowel movement] for 3 days or more, offer Bowel meds of resident choice listed below, along with non- pharmacological Interventions . MiraLAX 17gm [grams] in 4 – 8oz [ounce] of fluid, applesauce or pudding, PO [by mouth] QD [everyday] / PRN [as needed] no BM x 2 days. May be repeated two consecutive days Bisacodyl 5mg PO, 1 tablet PO Q 24 hours, PRN no BM x 2 days, if client does not prefer MiraLAX. May be repeated two consecutive days. Bisacodyl, 10mg PR, every 24 hrs., PRN for constipation. Fleets Enema (Mineral Oil) once…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fluid intake was accurately monitored, documented, and assessed for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 16 & 4) reviewed with a fluid restriction. The failure to accurately record fluid intake and to calculate the 24-hour fluid intake total, precluded staff from determining if residents was adherent with or were exceeding the fluid restriction. This placed residents at risk for fluid volume overload, fluid and electrolyte imbalances, unidentified education needs and other medical complications. Findings included .Review of the facility's Fluid Restriction policy, revised 01/2025, showed a fluid restriction order would include the total amount of the fluid restriction per day, and identify how the fluid would be distributed between dietary department and nursing. If a resident was non-adherent or refused the fluid restriction, staff would identify and document why, educate the resident on the risks and benefits of non-adherence and notify the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation of records and evidence of real time analysis of their infection control program for 2 of 6 months (December 2025 and January 2026) reviewed for monthly line listings, monthly maps and/or monthly summaries for the facility's surveillance program. These failures could prevent the facility from identifying trends and implementing interventions that would prevent residents from acquiring facility related infections.Findings included.The facility's policy titled Infection Surveillance. dated 11/2025, documented Monthly time periods will be used for capturing and reporting data. Line charts will be used to show data comparisons over time and will be monitored for trends. On 02/12/2026 at 1:15 PM, Staff I, Infection Preventionists (IP)/Registered Nurse (RN), when asked if she had a line listing for December 2025, said no. Staff I said, she had been behind in December and decided to keep up with January and February because they were currently happening.On 02/13/2026 at 8:45 AM, Staff I, IP/RN, said she had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident choice related to frequency and type of bathing and access to fluids of choice for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 4, 38 & 6) reviewed for choices. The failure to promote and facilitate resident self-determination by offering and honoring residents' choices related to bathing type and frequency and access to beverages of choice, placed residents at risk for poor hygiene, dehydration, feelings of powerlessness, and diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of the facility's Promoting Resident Self Determination policy, revised 11/2024, showed it was the facility's practice to protect and promote resident rights by promoting and facilitating resident self-determination through support of resident choice. The facility would ensure that each resident had the opportunity to exercise autonomy regarding those things that were important in their life such as preferences. Each resident had the right to choose aspects of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable and homelike environment on 1 of 2 shower rooms ([NAME] Unit). The failure to ensure the floor was clean and in good repair and the vinyl wall panels were free of damage (cracks, missing pieces etc) placed resident at risk for a diminished quality of life and resulted in a less than homelike environment. Findings included . On 02/10/2026 at 10:16 AM, Resident 38 wanted to discuss the The state of the shower room. They stated, there are cracks in the floor that are filled with caulking, the walls are damaged, tiles are cracked and/or missing. It needs to be fixed. It is a mess. I suggested they stop using the shower room because it needs work badly. On 02/10/2026 2:19 PM, observation of the shower room outside the double doors to the [NAME] Unit revealed the following:The shower room flooring consisted of a seamless resinous (epoxy) surface. The flooring demonstrated extensive discoloration, surface wear, and areas of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans (CPs) were reviewed, revised, and accurately reflected residents' care needs for 3 of 24 residents (Residents 4, 16 & 38) whose care plans were reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs and diminished quality of life.Findings included .Resident 4Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review showed an order, dated 07/31/2025, for a 1500 milliliter (ml) per day fluid restriction secondary to hyponatremia (low sodium). A nutrition CP, revised 02/09/2026, documented the resident was on a 1500 ml per day fluid restriction. The care plan did not identify the goal of the fluid restriction, identify how the fluid would be allotted between the dietary department and nursing; instruct staff what action, if any, should be taken if the resident was non-adherent with the restriction (e.g., patient education, risk versus benefits, Physician notification etc.),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure bathing services were provided as scheduled, or reoffered if refused, for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 14) reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. This failure placed residents at risk for poor hygiene, skin breakdown, reduced dignity and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the facility's Promoting Resident Self Determination policy, revised 11/2025, documented Each resident has the right to choose aspects of their daily routine (including sleeping, eating, bathing and waking times), consistent with their interests, assessments, and plans of care. In the event a resident refuses care or treatment, the refusal is to be documented and the care/treatment reoffered.Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of dementia. The Annual Minimum Data Set, (an assessment tool), dated 12/29/2025, documented Resident 14 was moderately cognitively impaired and had no rejections of care. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered within ordered parameters for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 3) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving medications outside of ordered parameters and a decreased quality of life.Findings included.Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment), dated 12/23/2025, Resident 3's skills for daily decision making were moderately impaired.Resident 3 had an order, dated 02/17/2025, for Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen (pain medication) to be given every four hours as needed for moderate to severe pain with a pain score of 6-10 (the numbers were based on a numeric rating scale for pain assessment, where 0 represent no pain and 10 represents the worst pain imaginable)Review of Resident 3's Medication Administration Record (MAR) from 01/01/2026 through 01/31/2026, documented the Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen had been administered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-13 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5%, by having an error rate of 8%, with 2 of 25 medication administration errors for observed opportunities. This failure placed residents at risk of medication complications, misuse of medications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.MEDICATION NOT GIVEN AS ORDEREDOn 02/11/2026 at 9:37 AM, Staff E, Registered Nurse, said that Resident 13 had just finished their breakfast and she would be giving ferrous sulfate, a medication ordered to be taken with breakfast.On 02/11/2026 at 9:51 AM, Resident 13 was observed to be given the ferrous sulfate, along with pantoprazole.Review of the order for Pantoprazole, dated 11/18/2025, included to take the medication with an empty stomach approximately 30 minutes to 1 hour before meal. On 02/12/2026 at 11:13 AM, Staff E, said the pantoprazole should have been give on an empty stomach, not after breakfast. On 02/12/2026 at 11:35 AM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services (DNS), when asked about Staff E giving ferrous…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for a surgical wound for 1 of 3 (Resident 1) residents reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed residents at risk for clinical complications, infections and discomfort. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 1's Hospital's Skilled Nursing Facility Transfer Orders, dated 02/15/2025, showed the resident had a C2-T10 PSF, T4 Corpectomy (surgical procedure on the spine) on 02/06/2025. The orders showed discharge instructions to the SNF [skilled nursing facility] to remove the staples in the incisionthree weeks postop (post-surgery) unless there were any concerns about the incision and then call the surgeon. Review of Resident 1's electronic medical record on 05/13/2025, showed no documentation the staples were removed from the resident's incision and/or the surgeon was contacted. Resident 1's discharge orders, dated 03/03/2025, showed the resident had a follow up appointment with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with toileting and bed mobility for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed residents at risk for skin breakdown, poor hygiene and pain. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cancer and pressure ulcers (injury to skin and underlying tissue resulting from prolonged pressure). Resident 1's admission screening and history evaluation, dated 04/03/2025, showed the resident was cognitively intact, needed assistance from staff with bed mobility, totally dependent for toileting and had acute and chronic pain. Resident 1's care plan, dated 04/03/2025, showed the resident was a 1 PA [person assist] with bed mobility and a 1-2 PA with maximum assist using bed pan for bowel movements. The care plan showed the resident had impairments to the skin integrity in the perineal area (sensitive skin between the anus and the genitals), lower extremities, coccyx…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans (CPs) were reviewed, revised, and accurately reflected residents' care needs for 6 of 25 sampled residents (Residents 73, 99, 81, 8, 11 and 91) whose care plans were reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 73 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) showed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, diagnoses of dementia with agitation, and anxiety and depressive disorders. Resident 73 required treatment with antidepressant, antianxiety, and antipsychotic medications during the assessment period. A psychotropic drug use CP, revised 10/25/2024, showed the resident received clonazepam (an anxiolytic medication) and Seroquel (an antipsychotic medication) for anxiety. Staff were directed to monitor behaviors and document them on the behavior flowsheet. The CP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-16 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to comprehensively assess residents for the use of bed rails/mobility bars for 4 of 5 residents (Residents 11, 51, 40,and 91) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed residents at risk for potential injury, potential restraint, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy, titled Proper Use of Side Rails, revised 09/2024, documented side rails will not be offered to residents on admission. A full assessment will be completed and informed consent obtained prior to authorizing the use of side rails. 1) Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed Resident 11 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident 11 had diagnoses of depression (decreased pleasure or interest), anxiety (increased stress), and post-traumatic stress disorder (traumatic event that triggers thoughts/distress/anxiety). The Significant Change Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], showed Resident 11 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-16 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use nonpharmacological interventions (NPI, nonmedicated methods of achieving an outcome) prior to the use of as needed (PRN) pain medications for 4 of 8 sampled residents (Residents 11, 24, 78 and 355) when reviewed for unnecessary medications and pain. This failure placed residents at risk of avoidable side effects, taking unneeded medications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia and chronic pain. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 10/17/2024, showed the resident required partial to setup assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) and was cognitively intact. A review of Resident 78's Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed an order for oxycodone 5 milligram (mg, a unit of measurement for weight in the metric system) every 4 hours as needed for chronic pain and an order for acetaminophen 325 mg tablet, to give…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . AMENDED 01/02/2024 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 7 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 11, 73, 78, 27, 62, 22, and 82) reviewed for unnecessary medications were free from unnecessary psychotropic (affect mind, emotions and/or behaviors) medications. Facility staff failed to fully complete the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS, an assessment used to determine the severity of abnormal movements in a patient's body) for residents using antipsychotic (a class of drugs used to treat mental health conditions characterized by psychosis) medication. The facility also failed to identify, monitor, and document observed target behaviors and non-pharmacological interventions. These failures placed residents at an increased risk for experiencing medication-related adverse side effects, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Psychotropic Drugs Utilization, dated 12/2024, documented, A. Movement disorder evaluation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, infection control precaution of wearing gown and gloves during high contact activities during resident care) had precaution signage implemented correctly for 5 out of 14 residents (Residents 19, 576, 59, 24, and 155) reviewed for EBP, that infection control precautions were followed for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 54 and 91) sampled for observation of infection control practices, the antibiotic surveillance was accurate and complete, the Legionella Water Management Program identified and monitored internal areas of risk, and to store and clean continuous positive airway pressure machines (CPAP, device that uses mild air pressure to keep breathing airways open while you sleep) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 51) reviewed for CPAP. This failure placed residents at risk for spread of infection, health complications, unidentified care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were provided accurate information regarding the risks and benefits associated with proposed drug therapies for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 11 & 73) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The failure to accurately identify medication/drug class and associated adverse side effects (ASEs) detracted from residents' ability to make informed decisions about proposed drug therapies, and placed them at risk for making treatment decisions based on inaccurate information. Findings included . Review of the facility's Psychotropic Drug Utilization policy, dated 12/2024, showed a psychotropic drug was defined as any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental process and behavior. In the event a psychoactive medication was ordered, licensed staff would obtain informed consent for the use of the medication prior to initiating therapy. 1) Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain an assessment, orders, consent, and develop a care plan for the use of potential restraints for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 91) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed residents at risk for potential injury, potential restraint, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 91 readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 09/19/2024, showed Resident 91 was dependent with mobility abilities, was rarely/never understood, and was moderately impaired for daily decision making. On 12/10/2024 at 2:49 PM, Resident 91 was observed in bed with body pillows (longer than standard pillows) on both sides of their bed positioned under the fitted sheet. Review of Resident 91's Electronic Health Record showed no assessment, consent, orders, or care plan documentation for the body pillows. On 12/11/2024 at 8:45 AM, Resident 91 was observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set Assessments (MDS), assessment tool, were accurate for 2 of 25 sampled residents (Residents 54 and 11). This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed Resident 54 was admitted on [DATE]. Resident 54 had diagnoses of retention of urine and neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder (problem with bladder control). Resident 54 had a suprapubic catheter (small tube that drains urine from bladder by an incision through the abdomen). Resident 54's Annual MDS, dated [DATE], documented they had an indwelling catheter (including suprapubic catheter and nephrostomy tube) and for urinary continence that they were always incontinent (no episodes of continent voiding). Further review of the MDS showed that for urinary continence another option that was available but was not selected was, Not rated, resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessment accurately reflected the resident's mental health diagnoses and Level II PASRR evaluations were timely referred and completed for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 73) reviewed for PASRRs. The failure to ensure Level I PASRRs were accurately completed, and residents were timely referred for Level II PASRR evaluations, placed residents at risk for inappropriate placement, and not receiving timely and necessary mental health services to meet their mental health needs. Findings included . Resident 73 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Annual Minimum Data Set Assessment, dated 09/25/2024, showed the resident was severely cognitively impaired, and had diagnoses of non-Alzheimer's dementia (a brain disorder that gradually destroys memory and thinking skills, and eventually the ability to perform basic tasks) with agitation, and anxiety (a common reaction to stress that can cause…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review, revise and implement a comprehensive plan of care to included resident specific information for 5 of 25 sampled residents (Residents 59, 78, 91, 11 & 51) reviewed for care plans. The failure to establish care plans that were individualized, accurately reflected assessed care needs and provided direction to staff, placed residents at risk to receive inappropriate and inadequate care to meet their individualized needs. Findings included . 1) Resident 59 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of sleep apnea (a sleep disorder characterized by repeated pauses in breathing during sleep). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 11/06/2024, showed the resident required supervision to substantial assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) and was cognitively intact. Resident 59's altered respiratory status/difficulty breathing care plan, dated 05/16/2022, listed the resident had a continuous positive airway…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for 3 of 25 sampled residents (Residents 73, 51 and 40) reviewed for professional standards. Facility staff failed to timely transcribe and timely carry out physician orders, and/or clarify confusing or incomplete orders. Additionally, staff failed to ensure medications were secure, as nurses left the medication cart unlocked when unattended and/or left medication at a residents' bedside without an order to do so, or a self-medication assessment being completed. These failures placed residents at risk for medication errors, complications of treatments, and other potential negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Failure to Clarify Incomplete Orders> 1) Resident 73 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) showed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, a diagnosis of heart failure and required the use of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with bathing for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 90) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The failed practice placed residents at risk for a decline in care and quality of life. Findings included . Resident 90 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 09/04/2024, documented the resident had severe cognitive impairment and required supervision for ADLs. A review of the Point of Care (nursing assistant task documentation) response history for 30 days, the 'Shower Book' and the 'Marina Daily Shower' sheets documented Resident 90 only received a shower on 11/17/2024, 12/02/2024, and 12/08/2024. A review of Resident 90's care plan, dated 11/29/202,3 listed a problem of ADL self-care performance deficit . and an intervention of if unable to perform shower, offer bed bath. On 12/12/2024 at 2:26 PM, Staff E, Unit Manager/Licensed Practical Nurse, said Resident 90 did not receive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement care and services in accordance with accepted professional standards for 3 of 6 residents (Residents 82, 11, and 99) reviewed for quality of care related to bowel management and hospice services. This failure placed the residents at risk for discomfort and complications related to constipation and risk for substandard care related to lack of coordination with hospice (provides end of life orders/interventions). Findings included . <Bowel management> Facility Bowel Management Policy, dated 2024, said the licensed nurse was to check the bowel record each day. If there was no BM (bowel movement) or small BM, the nurse would implement non-pharmacological interventions. If no BM for three days or more, pharmocological interventions would also be offered. It was the responsibility of the nurse to complete documentation and to notify the medical provider if interventions were ineffective. 1) Resident 82 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pressure relieving device was working correctly for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 81) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure placed residents at risk for delayed healing and further skin impairment. Findings included . Resident 81 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Guillain-Barre Syndrome (a condition in which the immune system attacks the nerves) and malnutrition (lack of sufficient nutrients in the body). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 09/23/2024 showed Resident 81 was moderately cognitively impaired, needed extensive assist for activities of daily living, and had one or more unhealed pressure ulcers. On 12/09/2024 at 10:18 AM and 3:30 PM, Resident 81 was observed lying in bed. A pressure relieving mattress was in place with a setting of 5 (1-softest setting through 5-firmest setting). On 12/10/2024 at 10:30AM, on 12/11/2024 at 9:27 AM and 10:57AM, and on 12/12/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-16 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen (O2), continuous positive airway pressure services (CPAP, an external device that provides a fixed pressure to keep breathing airways open while you sleep), and breathing treatments via nebulizer (a machine that turns liquid medicine into a mist that can be inhaled) were provided in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 73, 51 and 81) reviewed for respiratory care. The failure of staff to document the amount of O2 administered, to ensure O2 orders included checking and replacing of humidifier bottles, and CPAP orders included the prescribed pressure settings, type of mask to be used (e.g. nasal pillows, nasal mask, full face mask), direction to check and refill the humidifier reservoir, and identification of the solution to be used (e.g. distilled water), placed residents at risk for ineffective assisted ventilation and unmet respiratory needs. Findings included . Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-16 · tag F0773 — isolated
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promptly notify the ordering provider of laboratory results that fell outside of clinical reference ranges for 1 of 5 sample residents (Resident 73) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk for delayed treatment and potential negative outcomes. Findings included . Review of the facility's, Provider Notification - Labs policy, dated 12/2024, showed the facility must promptly notify the attending provider of lab results that fall outside of clinical reference ranges. Delayed notification may contribute to delayed changes to the treatment plan. Promptly meant that results would be relayed with little or no delay to the ordering physician, or in accordance with facility policy regarding which labs require immediate versus non- immediate notification. Lab results requiring non-immediate provider notification could be placed in the providers folder for review upon next visit. 1) Resident 73 was admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 3 staff members (Staff A, B and C) used personal protective equipment (PPE) in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines when caring for residents with known COVID 19 (an infectious virus causing respiratory illness that may cause difficulty breathing and could lead to severe impairment or death) infections. This failure placed residents and staff at risk for contracting and spreading COVID 19. Findings included . A 03/18/2024 CDC update titled, Interim Infection Prevention and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic, showed when health care personnel enter the room of a patient with suspected or confirmed COVID 19, they should use a N95 respirator (a mask that filters 95% of airborne particles), gown, gloves, and eye protection. When a N95 respirator was used during the care of a resident with a COVID 19 infection, they should be removed and discarded after the resident care encounter and a new one should be donned. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident choices regarding bathing frequency were honored for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 33, 100, 73 and 19) reviewed for choices related to bathing. The facility's failure to accommodate resident preferences related to frequency of bathing placed residents at risk for feelings of un-cleanliness, powerlessness, decreased self-worth, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1)On 10/23/2023 at 3:58 PM, Resident 33 said they were supposed to be showered weekly on Mondays but felt facility staff did not consistently do so. Review of resident 33's comprehensive care plan showed their desired bathing frequency was not identified. Resident 33's September and October 2023 bathing records showed from 09/01/2023 through 10/25/2023, the resident was offered/provided bathing on three (09/11/2023, 09/25/2023 and 10/02/2023) of eight opportunities. On 10/27/2023 at 12:15 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing (DNS), said it was the expectation that residents' bathing preferences be honored and acknowledged Resident 33's had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-27 · tag F0636 — pattern
    Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident admission and annual Minimum Data Sets (MDS, an assessment tool) were completed within the required timeframes for 8 of 11 sampled residents (Residents 1, 37, 26, 49, 43, 75, 33 & 94) reviewed for resident assessments. Failure to complete admission and annual assessments within the required timeframes, placed residents at risk for a delay in identification of care needs and/or unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI, a manual that directs staff on requirements for completion of MDS's) showed annual assessments must be completed no later than the assessment reference date (ARD) plus14 calendar days and admission assessments must be completed no later than the admission date plus13 days. 1) Resident 1's electronic health record (EHR) showed an annual MDS had an ARD of 08/10/2023. Review of the annual MDS completion date showed it was not completed until 10/08/2023, 59 days after the ARD. On 10/26/2023 at 1:44 PM, Staff E, MDS Director, said Resident 1's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-27 · tag F0638 — pattern
    Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident quarterly Minimum Data Sets (MDS, an assessment tool) were completed within 14 days of the assessment reference date (ARD) as required for 9 of 11 residents (Residents 1, 37, 26, 49, 43, 75, 33, 90 & 94) reviewed for resident assessments. Failure to timely complete resident quarterly assessments, placed residents at risk for a delay in identification of care needs and/or unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI, a manual that directs staff on requirements for completion of MDS's), showed quarterly assessments must be completed no later than the ARD plus 14 calendar days. 1) Resident 1's electronic health record (EHR) showed a quarterly MDS had an ARD of 05/10/2023. Review of the quarterly MDS completion date showed it was not completed until 07/16/2023, 69 days after the ARD. On 10/26/2023 at 1:44 PM, Staff E, MDS Director, said Resident 1's 05/10/2023 quarterly MDS assessment was completed late. 2) Resident 37's EHR showed a quarterly MDS had an ARD of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) to include trimming residents' fingernails and toenails and providing assistance with eating for 3 of 4 dependent residents (Residents 100, 19 & 97) reviewed for ADL's. The failure to provide assistance with eating and nail care to dependent residents, placed them at risk for decreased intake, weight loss, poor hygiene, embarrassment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Assistance with Eating> 1) Review of Resident 100's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 09/05/2023, showed the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance with eating and personal hygiene. Resident 100's ADL care plan, revised 10/23/2023, showed the resident required one-person extensive assistance with meals. On 10/23/2023 at 11:58 AM, Staff N, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) delivered Resident 100's lunch tray, positioned her in bed and exited the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and services as ordered for 4 of 7 residents (Residents 93, 31, 97 and 51) reviewed for bowel management. The failure to provide bowel care in accordance with the facility's bowel protocol and/or physician's orders placed residents at risk for constipation, pain/discomfort and other potential negative health outcomes. Findings included . The facility's Bowel Management Protocol, dated May 2018, documented that if a resident had had not produced a bowel movement after two days, nursing staff would initiate the bowel management protocol. On day three staff would offer Miralax (laxative) or bisacodyl (laxative) and these could be repeated the following day. If no bowel movement was produced on day four, staff would offer a bisacodyl suppository. If no bowel movement, on day five staff would offer an enema. 1) Resident 31 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The annual Minimum Data Set, (MDS, an assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received respiratory care in accordance with professional standards of practice and physicians' orders for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 97 & 100) reviewed for respiratory care. The facility's failure to ensure nebulizer (an electrically powered machine that turns liquid medication into a mist so that it can be breathed directly into the lungs) tubing and masks were cleaned and periodically changed, and a residents' peripheral oxygen saturation were monitored, as ordered to determine if administration of supplemental oxygen was indicated, placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet respiratory needs and potential negative outcomes. Findings included . 1) Resident 97's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 08/10/2023, showed the resident had no respiratory related diagnoses but required supplemental oxygen during the assessment period. Resident 97's physician's orders, dated 02/17/2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-27 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to assess resident care needs, and to provide and supervise that care as evidenced by the failure to complete resident assessments within required time frames for 8 of 11 residents (Residents 1, 37, 26, 49, 43, 75, 33 & 94) reviewed, to honor resident preferences related to bathing frequency for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 33, 100, 73 and 19) reviewed for choices, and to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for 3 of 4 dependent residents (Residents 100, 19 & 97) reviewed for ADLs. These failures placed residents at risk for poor hygiene, unidentified and unmet care needs, feelings of powerlessness, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident Assessments> On 10/26/2023 at 1:52 PM, when asked what was preventing the facility from completing resident assessments within the required time frames, Staff E, MDS (Minimum Data Set) Director, said it was staffing. Staff E explained the facility had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-10-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled and dated when opened in 3 of 3 nourishment refrigerators (Bay Unit, Hydration Station, and [NAME] Unit). This failure placed residents at risk for cross-contamination and food borne illness. Findings included . <Bay Unit Refrigerator> On 10/23/2023 at 11:35 AM, the Bay Unit refrigerator, in the corner of Bay Dining Hall, was observed with an undated, unlabeled, and partially filled glass jar of Smuckers jelly, and 2 liter bottles of Sprite and Root Beer. At 11:35 AM, Staff J, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), stated, This all should have been dated here. <Hydration Station Refrigerator> On 10/27/2023 at 09:33 AM, the Hydration Station small refrigerator, was observed with an undated, unlabeled, and partially consumed glass jar of Smuckers jelly, and a jar of sweet chili sauce. In the same refrigerator unit, was an undated, and unlabeled small, orange, plastic container with unidentifiable contents of food. At 9:35 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control principles were followed related to management of urinary drainage bags, proper use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE), appropriate infection control measures during COVID-19 (a disease which can be very contagious and spreads quickly and capable of progressing to severe symptoms including death) testing, and following transmission-based precautions (TBP) for COVID-19 virus for 4 of 8 sampled residents (97, 102, 10 & 311) reviewed for infection control measures related to urinary drainage bags, PPE, COVID-19 testing and TBP. These failures placed residents at risk for contracting COVID-19 and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Facility policy entitled COVID-19 Interim Guidelines for Collecting and Handling of Clinical Specimens for COVID-19, revised 10/23/2023, showed nurses should test one resident at a time. Nurses should wash their hands or use hand sanitizer before and/or after securing a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure visibly dirty/soiled bed linen was removed and clean linen provided for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 97) reviewed for environment. This failure placed the resident at risk of feeling unclean, undignified, for potential infections and diminished self-worth. Findings included . A progress note, dated 10/18/2023 at 12:14 PM, documented Resident 97 had a new open area to their left ear. On 10/23/2023 at 2:08 PM, Resident 97 was observed in a left side-lying position in bed, with the left side of their head/face laying directly on the mattress without a pillow. Multiple dime and quarter sized brownish/red stains were noted on the fitted sheet clustered around Resident 97's head. Additionally, two large dry brown stains were observed on the right top side of the fitted sheet and continued off the edge of the mattress towards the floor. On 10/24/2023 at 9:54 AM and 11:18 AM, and 10/25/2023 at 12:22 PM, Resident 97's soiled bedding had not been changed. The cluster of dime and quarter sized reddish brown stains were still…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plans (CPs) were reviewed, revised and accurately reflected resident care needs for 3 of 25 sampled residents (Resident 97, 73, and 100) reviewed for care plans. This placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 97's activities of daily living CP, revised 10/09/2023, showed the resident received a mechanical soft diet with thin liquids. Resident 97's chewing and swallowing difficulty CP, revised 10/19/2023, showed staff were to provide a mechanical soft diet with thickened liquids. Physician orders for Resident 97 showed an order, dated 02/20/2023, for a mechanical soft diet with thin liquids. Resident 97's activities of daily living CP, revised 10/09/2023, showed the resident had the following restorative programs (nursing interventions that promote the residents' ability to adapt and adjust to living as independently and safely as possible): 1) Active range of motion (ROM) utilizing motorized therapeutic cycle on level one for 15…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-27 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for 2 of 25 sampled residents (Residents 97 & 100) reviewed. The failure to follow and/or clarify physicians' orders when indicated and to only sign for those tasks completed, placed residents at risk for medication errors and unmet care needs. Findings included . 1) Resident 97's physician orders showed an order, dated 02/20/2023, for oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) every six hours, as needed, for pain. Resident 97's October 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed the resident was medicated with oxycodone on 10/02/2023 at 5:28 PM and 10/04/2023 at 4:06 PM for a pain level of zero. Resident 97's physician orders showed an order, dated 10/15/2023, to administer oxycodone liquid concentrate every two hours, as needed, for pain or difficulty breathing and directed staff to notify hospice after two doses. Resident 97's October 2023 MAR showed the resident was medicated with oxycodone on 10/16/2023 at 9:15 PM and 10/23/2023 at 9:19 AM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with indwelling urinary catheters (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder through the urethra that drains into a bag) were assessed for catheter removal as soon as possible, had a documented justification for ongoing catheter use if removal was contraindicated, or were referred to urology for evaluation in the absence of a documented justification. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure catheter care and management was provided in a manner that minimized the risk for complications and catheter related urinary tract infections for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 97) reviewed for urinary catheters. These failures placed residents at risk for catheter associated urinary tract infections and other potential negative health complications/outcomes. Findings included . Per the Centers for Disease Control Guideline for Prevention of Catheter-associated Urinary Tract Infections 2009, catheter tubing must be placed in a manner…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adaptive equipment with meals, for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 100) reviewed and who required assistance. Failure to provide adaptive equipment placed residents at risk for decreased independence with self-feeding, poor meal intake, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 100's activities of daily living care plan, revised 10/23/2023, showed staff were directed to provide light-weight silverware with built up handles (makes silverware easier to grasp) for all meals. On 10/23/2023 at 11:58 AM, Staff N, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) delivered Resident 100's lunch tray, positioned her in bed and exited the room. Observation of the tray showed Resident 100 was not provided silverware with built-up handles as they were assessed to require. At 12:52 PM, Resident 100 said there were attachments for the silverware in her top drawer of her bedside table that staff were to apply to the handles of her silverware. She indicated they were effective in improving her ability to handle…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to designate a member of their inter-disciplinary team (IDT) who would be responsible for working with hospice representatives to ensure effective coordination of care between the facility and hospice staff, for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 97) reviewed for hospice services. Additionally, the facility failed to obtain a copy of the resident's hospice plan of care, which identified what services were to be provided, and which delineated hospice/facility responsibilities. These failures detracted from establishing a system by which consistent communication between the facility and hospice staff occurred and placed the residents at risk for not for receiving necessary care and services. Findings included . Review of the facility's hospice program policy, revised July 2017, showed the facility would designate a member from their IDT to coordinate care with the hospice provider. The designee would be responsible for obtaining the most recent hospice plan of care and the names and contact information for hospice personnel involved…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-27 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer the pneumococcal vaccine to 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 93) reviewed for pneumonia vaccinations. This failure placed residents at risk for developing pneumonia with potential negative outcomes. Findings included . Resident 93 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses, including dementia and congestive heart failure. The quarterly Minimum Data Set, an assessment tool, dated 07/13/2023, documented the resident was severely cognitively impaired. The facility's Pneumococcal Vaccine policy, revised 07/2017, documented, Before receiving a pneumococcal vaccine, the resident or legal representative shall receive information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the pneumococcal vaccine. Provision of such education shall be documented in the resident's medical record. Resident 93's electronic health record (EHR) did not document the resident's pneumococcal vaccine status. The EHR did not document…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
LADENBURG, LYNETTEIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 10/31/2016
VERNON-COLE, CHRISTOPHERIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/25/2017
KOERNER, EDWARDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/23/2024
OCONER, ELLENIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/01/2016
SHARMAN, DONALDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2021

CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-10.3%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 4%Other / private 27%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$407per resident / day
operating cost
$12,366per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$369per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505474. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-13, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next