No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Washington Veteran Home-Retsil

1141 Beach Drive, Pt Orchard, WA 98366 · Government - State · 240 certified beds · (360) 895-4700 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (360) 895-4700 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0605, F0609, F0610) — most recent May 2026Resident-funds citations (F0567, F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0744, F0758)1 actual-harm citation$23,920 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567, F0569)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $23,920 in federal fines (most recent 2025-07-02)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
205 Bethel Ave · (360) 602-2806 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Grocery
1434 Olney Ave SE · (360) 895-0613 · Call to confirm hours
Park
985 Retsil Rd SE · (360) 337-5350 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 3 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.7%14.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.9%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.0%1.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms11.4%17.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.8%2.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened20.9%17.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.7%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.9%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.0%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.5%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table7.8%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.9%1.3%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine70.0%82.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission15.7%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.4%13.4%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.021.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.941.521.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.3%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFsnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.91
RN hours/ resident / day
0.51
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.47
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.88
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.72
RN hoursweekends
45.1%
Total nursing turnover
26.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 240 beds and averages 231.6 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.91 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.47 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.55 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.02 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.72 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 45% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-11)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2025-04-28)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

59 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow manufacturer's guidelines during the use of a mechanical lift and the lift sling for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1, 5) reviewed for falls. The facility failed to assess, evaluate the root cause, and implement fall prevention interventions specific to resident needs for 4 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4) reviewed for accidents. In addition, the facility failed to follow manufacturer instructions for routine, documented inspection of the mechanical lift slings. Resident 1 experienced harm when they sustained a hip fracture when transferred with a mechanical lift and sling in a manner inconsistent with the manufacturer instructions. These failures placed all residents that required mechanical lift transfer at risk for avoidable falls, physical injuries, functional decline, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Mechanical lift sling> <Resident 1> Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-11 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents with personal funds accounts had access to their accounts after business hours and on the weekends for 7 of 10 sampled residents (Resident 121, 135,15, 3, 232, 4 & 14) reviewed for personal funds accounts. This failure placed residents at risk of not having access to their accounts during non-banking hours, a decreased sense of autonomy and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.On 05/05/2026 at 12:34 PM, Resident 121 said I can get money whenever I want except Saturday and Sunday. The doors were locked on the weekends.On 05/04/2026 at 3:08 PM, Resident 135 said they were told they could withdraw money on the weekend and get up to $100 by going to the front desk, but no one's ever there on the weekend so you really can't and during the week you could only withdraw money before 3 pm.On 05/04/2026 at 10:53 AM, Resident 15 said they could withdraw their money only during normal business hours because there was no one in the administrative area to withdraw money at night. Resident 15 said, they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-11 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a system that ensured copies of advanced directives (written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care) were requested from residents who indicated they had one, and/or to provide information and assistance to residents who expressed an interest in formulating one for 6 of 6 residents (Resident 105, 121, 135, 148, 10 & 232) reviewed for advanced directives. These failures placed residents at risk of not having their healthcare choices honored and/or detracted from residents' ability to have their healthcare preferences known. Findings included .Resident 105Resident 105 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's admission agreement showed they had a durable power of attorney (DPOA) for healthcare but had not provided a copy to the facility.Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed there was not a copy of Resident 105's DPOA for healthcare, nor was there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-11 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — pattern
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications (any drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) included adverse side effects and target behaviors were thoroughly documented and monitored, that as needed psychotropic medications limited to 14 days was reassessed, and Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS, a standardized, clinician-administered assessment designed to observe, quantify, and track involuntary movements in patients, especially those taking long-term antipsychotic medications) testing was completed within required timeframes for 4 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 19, 2, 121 & 13) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk of unnecessary medication usage, increase in side effects without interventions, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 19 Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia without behavioral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to have sufficient staff to ensure residents received timely call light responses during mealtimes. This failure placed residents at risk for accidents, injuries and diminished quality of life.Findings included .Staff InterviewsObservation and interview on 05/11/2026 at 11:01 AM, showed no Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) on the A hall. Five residents were observed in their rooms. Staff G, LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse), stated during mealtimes CNA's were assisting with feeding residents in the dining room and on the hall. Staff G stated they were responsible for responding to call lights for the duration of the mealtimes (approximately an hour). Staff G stated a resident who required two staff for care during that time were told they would need to wait until mealtime was over.During an interview on 05/11/2026 at 1:03 PM, Staff S, CNA, stated I leave my hall at 11:35 AM to assist with dining in the dining room, that leaves one CNA on the hall to pass trays and then they come to assist with feeding in the dining room. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain proper refrigerator, freezer and dishwasher temperatures logs for 1 of 1 kitchen and 4 of 4 serveries (AC, ABCD, EG, EFGH serveries) and prevent contamination during meal preparation services for 1 of 1 serveries (AC) reviewed for food service safety. The failure to maintain documented refrigerator/freezer and dishwasher temperature logs and prevent cross contamination placed residents at risk of foodborne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages), unsanitary conditions, and diminished quality of life. Findings included .Cross contaminationOn 05/06/2026 at 12:00 PM, Staff J, Lead Food Services worker, started plating lunch meals in the AC servery with gloves on. Staff J reviewed the resident's meal card tickets, that were wrapped in a plastic sleeve, before they grabbed a plate warmer and a plate. Staff J placed the hot food required by meal type on the plate and then placed the meal card on the tray and then retrieved the required items like pea salad cup, ambrosia cup or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal privacy was protected for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 25 and 75) reviewed for resident rights. This failure placed the residents at risk for embarrassment, a violation of their privacy, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Resident 25Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 25 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic pain, diabetes (too much sugar in the blood) and hypokalemia (low potassium). Resident 28 was able to make needs known.Observation on 05/04/2026 at 11:01 AM, showed Resident 25 had an [NAME] (electronic virtual assistant device) on their bedside table. Review of Resident 25's EHR showed no documentation of consent to the recording device in their room.Review of the Care Plan showed no documentation related to the [NAME].Resident 75Review of the EHR showed Resident 75 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to initiate a grievance for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 215) reviewed for missing personal property. This failure placed the resident at risk of unmet needs, personal loss and a diminished quality of life. Findings included. Review of the facility policy titled Missing Items, effective date 04/03/2025, showed the process for reporting and handling residents' missing property, including money was when a resident and/or resident's representative brought to the attention of a staff member a concern that money or a personal possession is missing the staff member to whom the loss was reported should check areas the item may have been misplaced. If the item could not be located, the staff member to whom the concern was reported was instructed to complete a grievance on the same day. Resident 215 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 02/03/2026, documented Resident 215 was moderately…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify allegations of abuse or neglect for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 11 and 98) reviewed for abuse. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and repeated potential abuse, neglect, or mistreatment, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse and Neglect-Resident Abuse Prevention, revised December 18, 2024, showed, NEGLECT: A pattern of conduct or inaction by a person or entity with a duty of care that fails to provide the goods and services that maintain physical or mental health of a vulnerable adult, or that fails to avoid or prevent physical or mental harm or pain to a vulnerable adult. In a Washington State Veterans Home, neglect also means a failure to provide a resident with the goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness. All incidents of alleged or suspected abuse, neglect, personal and/or financial exploitation, abandonment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure minimum data set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected residents' health status and/or care needs for 1 of 34 sample residents (Resident 13) reviewed. The failure to accurately code resident active diagnoses, placed residents at risk for unidentified and unmet psychosocial and/or behavioral care needs. Findings included . Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual (RAI, a manual that directs staff on how to accurately assess and code the status of residents) version 1.20.1, dated October 2025, once a diagnosis is identified, it must be determined if the diagnosis is active. Active diagnoses are diagnoses that have been documented in the last 60 days and have a direct relationship to the resident's current functional, cognitive, or mood or behavior status, medical treatments, nursing monitoring, or risk of death during the 7-day look back period. Nursing Monitoring includes clinical monitoring by a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop, implement and/or ensure residents' comprehensive care plans accurately reflected care needs for 3 of 34 sampled residents (Resident 19, 13 & 4) reviewed for care plans. These failures placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs, medical complications and a diminished quality of life.Findings included .Resident 19 Resident 19 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbances and terminal anxiety (the specific type of dementia cannot be clearly identified, despite the presence of cognitive decline and memory loss), Bipolar disorder (a mental health condition characterized by significant mood swings, including manic (or hypomanic) episodes and depressive episodes), and generalized anxiety (intense, excessive and persistent worry or fear). The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 48 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for 1 of 3 residents (Residents 4) reviewed for limited range of motion. Facility nurses demonstrated a pattern of falsely documenting the application of bilateral wrist splints, that were not applied. This failure resulted in a resident losing trust in assigned nursing staff and placed residents at risk of contracture formation/progression, loss of independence and/or increased dependence on staff and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Resident 4 Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review showed a provider order, dated 09/17/2024, that directed staff to assist with the application of Resident 4's bilateral wrist splints every morning and to assist with the removal of the wrist splints at bedtime.On 05/04/2026 at 2:08 PM, 05/06/2026 at 10:48 AM and 05/07/2026 at 11:58 AM, Resident 4 was observed without wrist splints in place.On 05/07/2026…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinent care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 11) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) for dependent residents. This failure placed dependent residents at risk for skin breakdown, poor hygiene and diminished quality of life.Findings included .Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 11 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included overactive bladder, depression (mood disorder), chronic right heart failure and hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting right side (partial loss of strength and near complete loss of voluntary movement). Resident 11 was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene.During an interview on 05/04/2026 at 12:02 PM, Resident 11 stated they were often left in a soiled (feces and urine) brief for long periods of time during mealtimes when they became a Hoyer transfer requiring two staff. Resident 11 stated they had developed sore areas that were painful. Resident 11 stated they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide bowel care in accordance with the facility's bowel protocol for 3 of 8 residents (Resident 3, 8 & 29) reviewed for bowel management. This failure placed residents at risk for nausea/vomiting, abdominal pain/discomfort, decreased appetite, and other negative health outcomes associated with untreated constipation.Findings included . Resident 3 Resident 3 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the Quarterly minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 02/11/2026, showed the resident was cognitively intact. On 05/05/2026 at 10:47 AM, Resident 3 said he had been struggling with constipation. Review of the April 2026 bowel record showed Resident 3 went from 04/15/2026 - 04/21/2026 (7 days), without a bowel movement (BM). Record review showed Resident 3 had the following as needed bowel care orders:a) Miralax as needed, for no BM for 48 hours, dated 02/25/2022.b) Milk of Magnesia once daily as needed for constipation, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-11 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Residents 11) was consistently offered/received services to maintain or prevent declines in mobility when reviewed for range of motion (ROM). This failure placed the residents at risk of decreased motion, mobility and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 11 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included overactive bladder, depression (mood disorder), chronic right heart failure and hemiplegia and hemiparesis affecting their right side (partial loss of strength and near complete loss of voluntary movement). Resident 11 was able to make their needs known.During an interview on 05/04/2026 at 12:14 PM, Resident 11 stated they recently requested to start participating in restorative or physical therapy due to declining mobility. Resident 11 stated in the past they had medical issues that interfered with their ability to participate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-11 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs, non-medication interventions) were attempted prior to the administration of as needed (PRN) pain medications for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 2 & 121) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk of unnecessary medication usage and a diminished quality of life. Resident 2 Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool) dated 05/01/2026, documented Resident 2 was severely cognitively impaired and was able to make needs known. A physician's order, dated 03/23/2021, documented, Pain Non-Pharmacological Codes: 1) Remove to calmer space 2) Ambulate resident 3) Refer to nurses note 4) Read material/coloring 5) Return to room [ROOM NUMBER]) Toileting 7) Provide food/snack 8) Give fluids 9) Change position 10) Adjust room temp 11) Back rub 12) 1 on 1 Conversation 13) Send to activities 14) Other were to be attempted prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly assess resident risk for elopement and provide the level of supervision required to prevent residents from eloping (exiting the facility without the required supervision) for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accidents. This failure placed residents at risk for inadequate supervision, elopement and potential of life-threatening situations. Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled, Missing Resident, dated 08/23/2024, showed the facility would identify residents at risk for elopement and they would be monitored to ensure their safety. Review of the facility policy titled, Wandering, Unsafe Resident, Revised August 2014, showed the facility would identify residents at risk for wandering/elopement, assess for correctable risk factors, and assess residents at risk for appropriateness of the use of a wander guard (specialized, wearable-based security solution to protect residents with cognitive deficits from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate allegations of abuse/neglect/mistreatment for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 3) reviewed for allegations of abuse/neglect. Failure to thoroughly investigate the allegations of abuse/neglect placed the residents at risk for continued mistreatment, unmet needs, and diminished quality of life.Findings included .According to the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, dated October 2015 (sixth edition), all incidents of abuse, neglect, abandonment, mistreatment, injuries of unknown source, personal and/or financial exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property must be thoroughly investigated. A thorough investigation is a systematic collection of review/evidence/information that describes and explains an event or a series of events to determine what occurred and make necessary changes to resident's plan of care and services to prevent reoccurrence. The investigation should include the who, what, when, where, why and how, of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the level of supervision required to prevent residents from eloping (exiting the facility without the required supervision) or attempting to exit the facility for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 1 and 2) reviewed for accidents and failed to timely correct the wander guard system in place. These failures placed residents at risk of significant injury and a decreased quality of life.Review of the facility policy titled, Missing Resident/Elopement, dated 09/22/2023, showed that residents would be identified for risk of wandering and/or elopement and those at risk would be monitored and staff were to take necessary precautions to ensure resident safety. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set, (MDS) an assessment tool, dated 05/05/2025, showed Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment, required the partial/ moderate assistance with the use of a manual wheelchair, and a wander/elopement…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-28 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess Minimum Data Sets (MDS, an assessment tool) for 5 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 41, 42, 108, 74 &75) reviewed. The failure to ensure complete and accurate assessments regarding appropriate diagnoses, communication, nutrition and mobility placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument Manual (RAI, a manual that directs staff on how to accurately assess and code the MDS), dated [DATE], showed staff should attempt to conduct a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, used to assess cognitive status in elderly patients) on all residents unless the resident was rarely/never understood; could not respond verbally, in writing, or by using another method; or an interpreter was needed but not available. Staff should not complete the Staff Assessment for Mental Status [SAMS] if the resident's interview should have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-28 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASRR) were complete and accurate for 4 of 7 sampled residents (Resident 69, 129, 150 & 78) reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed the residents at risk of unmet and unidentified care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included major depressive disorder (a mental disorder characterized by persistent feelings of sadness, loss of interest or pleasure in activities, and other symptoms that significantly impair daily functioning), anxiety disorder (a group of mental health conditions characterized by excessive and persistent worry or fear that can interfere with daily life), and unspecified psychosis (a diagnosis used when someone experiences symptoms like hallucinations or delusions). The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 03/13/2025, documented Resident 69 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were administered Covid vaccinations in a timely manner, informed consent was obtained (review risk/benefits), and/or physicians orders were followed for 6 of 35 sampled residents (Residents 78, 75, 167, 204, 132 & 108). These failures placed residents at risk of contracting disease, not understanding services consented for, and medical complications. Findings included . 1) Resident 78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 78's vaccination consents showed consent was obtained on 08/19/2024 for the Covid vaccination. Review of Resident 78's immunization lists, showed the Covid vaccination was last administered on 01/18/2024. No immunization was found after consent on 08/19/2024. On 04/25/2025 at 8:25 AM, Staff Q, Infection Preventionist (IP), looked in the electronic health record (EHR) and said there was not documentation for Resident 78 that the risk/benefits for Covid vaccination was reviewed. Regarding the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-28 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were screened on admission and/or during influenza season for influenza and/or pneumococcal vaccination and failed to obtain informed consent for vaccination for 5 of 5 residents (Residents 78, 75, 167, 204 & 132) reviewed for immunizations. This failure placed residents at risk of contracting disease, increased complications, not understanding services consented for, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 78's vaccination consents showed consent was obtained on 08/19/2024 for the influenza vaccination. Review of Resident 78's immunization lists, showed the influenza vaccination was administered on 10/10/2024. On 04/25/2025 at 8:25 AM, Staff Q, Infection Preventionist (IP), looked in the electronic health record (EHR) and said there was not documentation the risk/benefits for influenza vaccination was reviewed. 2) Resident 75 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner that promoted dignity for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 184) reviewed for dining services and 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 74) reviewed for urinary catheter (thin tube to remove urine). The facility failed to honor resident rights related to privacy of personal mail and/or medical appointments for 2 of 4 residents (Resident 166 & 132) when reviewed for resident rights. These failures placed residents at risk for feelings of diminished self-worth, embarrassment and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Dignity During Dining Services> On 04/23/2025 at 12:38 PM, the E/G Unit Dining room started plating food for residents sitting in the dining area. At 1:04 PM, Resident 184 was brought to the dining room by a staff member and seated at their assigned table. Staff D, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), immediately told Staff E, Food Services Worker (FSW) and Staff F, FSW, Residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0569 — isolated
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were transferred to the resident's representative or the resident's estate within 30 days of death or discharge, for 2 of 2 discharged residents (Resident 259 & 260) reviewed for trust accounts. This failure placed the residents and/or their representatives at risk for loss of funds and the interest accumulated. Findings included . 1) Review of Resident 259's Death in Facility Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 11/25/2024, showed the resident was discharged from the facility on 11/25/2024. Resident 259's trust account ledger, showed the resident had a trust balance of $83 on 11/25/2024. The check sent to the resident's representative/estate for $83, was dated 02/04/2025, 70 days after the resident discharged . On 04/28/2025 at 11:04 AM, Staff S, Fiscal Analyst 1, confirmed the facility failed to convey Resident 259's trust balance within 30 days as required. 2) Review of Resident 260's Death in Facility MDS, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate, investigate, and resolve a grievance for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 63) reviewed for grievances. This failure placed the residents at risk for emotional distress and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record, showed Resident 63 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included insomnia (difficulty falling and or staying asleep). Resident 63 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 04/21/2025 at 10:21 AM, Resident 63 stated they were upset that staff said they were no longer able to use their essential oils due to the strong smell. Resident 63 stated a member of nursing staff made a complaint about the smell. Review of a progress note, dated 04/02/2025 at 12:22 PM, showed Staff N, Social Services, informed Resident 63 that they could no longer use their diffuser (a scent producing item) in the facility. Resident 63 expressed their discontent and was provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete care plans for 2 of 35 sampled residents (Resident 41 & 2) reviewed for care planning. The failure to ensure complete and accurate care plans regarding appropriate diagnoses, mobility and restorative programs, placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 41 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 03/24/2025, documented Resident 41 was cognitively intact, was able to make their needs known and was diagnosed with a traumatic brain injury (a disruption in the normal function of the brain caused by an external force, such as a blow or jolt to the head), no diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease or dementia (a general term for the decline in mental abilities that affects memory, thinking, and reasoning, leading to difficulties with daily tasks). A physician's note, dated 01/31/2024, documented…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 166) reviewed for ADLs. Failure to provide oral care for Resident 166, who was dependent on staff for oral care, placed the resident at risk for unmet needs, poor hygiene and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record showed Resident 166 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of diabetes (too much sugar in the blood), obstructive and reflux uropathy (functional hindrance of urine flow) and depression. Resident 166 was dependent on staff for most activities of daily living. During an interview on 04/22/2025 at 10:32 AM, Resident 166 said staff were inconsistent with providing assistance with oral care. Review of Resident 166's care plan, dated 04/24/2024, showed they received oral care in the morning, after meals, and at bedtime, with substantial dependent assistance. During an interview on 04/24/2025 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure quality of care for bowel management for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 60) reviewed for bowel management, and services for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 132) reviewed for edema. These failures placed residents at risk of medical complications, delay in care and services, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Bowel Management> Review of the facility's document titled, Bowel Care Protocol, dated 02/01/2018, showed the night nurse would review bowel records and compile a list of residents who had not had a bowel movement for three days. The list would be passed on to the day shift nurse, who would initiate the bowel protocol as follows: a) Administer Polyethylene Glycol (laxative) at the beginning of day shift on day four. b) Administer Bisacodyl Suppository at the beginning of day shift on day five. c) Administer a Mineral oil enema at the beginning of day shift on day six. Note: If there were no results from the above…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2) Resident 27 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Bipolar disorder (a mental health condition characterized by significant shifts in mood, energy, and activity levels, ranging from periods of intense happiness or irritability (mania or hypomania) to periods of deep sadness or hopelessness (depression)), depression (a common mental health condition characterized by a persistent low mood, loss of interest or pleasure in activities, and other symptoms that can significantly interfere with daily life) and anxiety (a normal human emotion characterized by feelings of unease, worry, or fear, often about something that is about to happen or could happen in the future). Resident 27 required substantial assistance with most activities of daily living. Resident 27's provider's orders showed an order dated 03/20/2025, for hydrocodone-acetaminophen 5-325 milligrams two every six hours as needed for severe pain. Review of the MAR dated April 2025 from 04/01/2025 - 04/24/2025 showed the ordered, as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Gradual Dose Reduction (GRD, progressively minimizes a patient's medication levels over time) was completed for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 78) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The failure to complete a GDR placed residents at risk for overuse of psychotropic (mind altering) medication, health complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 78 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated 02/04/2025, documented Resident 78 was moderately cognitively impaired. The Quarterly MDS documented a GDR had been completed on 06/13/2024 and documented as clinically contraindicated by the physician. The electronic health record (EHR) provided no supporting documentation a GDR had been completed on 06/13/2024 for any psychotropic medications. Resident 78 was prescribed Sertraline (an antidepressant) 10 milligrams (mg) twice a day for depression starting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain locked medication carts for 2 of 11 medication storage carts (Cart D and Cart G) when reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed the residents at risk for missing medications, medication discrepancies and impaired quality of life. Findings included . During an observation on 04/24/2025 at 9:08 AM, Medication Cart D was left unlocked, as Staff R, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was on the other side of the cart working with a resident and after that was walking away to the nurse's station. During an interview on 04/24/2025 at 9:18 AM, Staff R, stated the medication cart should have been locked. On 04/21/2025 at 3:27 PM, Staff T, LPN, on G Hall (dementia unit) was standing at the medication cart speaking to a resident and then escorted the resident to his room. Observation of medication left unlocked. Three other residents were standing and or sitting within 10 feet of the medication cart. At 3:29 PM, Staff T returned to the medication cart. When asked to open the medication, Staff T opened the cart without…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store, prepare and serve food to residents in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food service safety. The failure to maintain documented dishwasher temperatures, to throw out expired/moldy foods and maintain sanitary conditions placed residents at risk of foodborne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages), unsanitary conditions, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Dishwasher temperatures> Review of dishwasher temperature logs for January 2025 showed: Main dining room (MDR)- no temperatures were recorded. AC 1 Hall dining room (AC)- no temperatures were recorded. ABCD Hall dining room (ABCD)- some temperatures were recorded, but not consistently. EFGH Hall dining room (EFGH)- no temperatures were recorded. EG 1 Hall dining room (EG)- no temperatures were recorded. Review of dishwasher temperature logs for February 2025 showed: Main dining room (MDR)- no temperatures were recorded. AC 1 Hall dining room (AC)- no temperatures were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff-maintained infection control practices by donning and doffing their Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for 1 of 1 COVID (G2 Hall) unit and to correctly carry out hand hygiene by staff when reviewed for infection control. The facility also failed to perform urinary catheter (thin tube to remove urine) care per standards of practice for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 26 & 135) reviewed for catheter care observation. This failure placed residents at risk for the spread of infection and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Donning and Doffing of PPE on G2 Unit with COVID Positive Residents> On 04/23/2025 at 2:22 PM, observed a cart with different types of N95 (a respiratory protective device designed to achieve a very close facial fit and very efficient filtration of airborne particles) masks on a cart outside the closed double doors to the G2 Unit where COVID positive residents are located. A review of the sign…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-14 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report to the state agency and log allegations of abuse/mistreatment by staff on the reporting log within five working days for 8 of 14 residents (1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 10, 14, & 15) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This failure placed residents at risk for repeated incidents, unmet care needs and unidentified abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . Facility policy, Abuse and Neglect, dated 12/01/2022, documented all alleged or suspected incidents of abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property will be reported and investigated in accordance with State and Federal rules. <Resident 1 & 14> Resident 1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS/an assessment tool) dated 01/09/2025, showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with intact cognition. Resident 14's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed Resident 14 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with severely impaired cognition. Progress notes, dated 11/22/2024, documented Resident 14 wandered into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-14 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation for 2 of 14 residents (3 & 7) reviewed for accidents. Facility failure to complete investigations placed residents at risk for ongoing neglect and abuse, unmet needs, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Facility policy, Abuse and Neglect, dated 12/01/2022, documents all incidents of alleged or suspected abused, neglect, personal and/or misappropriation of property and reported and investigated in accordance with State and Federal rules. <Resident 7> Resident 7's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS/an assessment tool), dated 02/28/2025, showed Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with severely impaired cognition. Progress notes, dated 12/06/2024, documented an unknown resident shouted at and nearly hit Resident 7. The incident required staff intervention to separate the 2 residents. Progress notes, dated 02/18/2025, documented there was a resident to resident physical altercation between…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure interventions were consistently implemented and monitored for effectiveness for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accidents and hazards. This failure placed residents at risk for falls, injury and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including dementia, post-traumatic stress disorder (a mental condition caused by experiencing a traumatic event), and blindness. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], documented Resident 1 has severe cognitive impairment and is dependent on staff with activities of daily living. The care plan, revised on 11/20/2024, documented Resident 1 was at risk for falls due to impulsivity and poor safety judgement, fierce determination to be independent, and decreased mobility. Care plan documented staff would toilet the resident every waking hour, place items within reach, invite to activities, and keep the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-20 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor the efficacy for use of an indwelling urinary catheter (a small flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (1), reviewed for catheter use. This failure placed the residents at increased risk of a catheter associated urinary tract infections, pain, and urethral trauma. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, post-traumatic stress disorder (a mental condition caused by experiencing a traumatic event), and blindness. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated , 10/14/2024, documented Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff with activities of daily living. The care plan, dated 10/16/2024, documents Resident 1 had an indwelling foley catheter due to an enlarged prostate, bladder neck obstruction (a blockage of urine flow), and a neurogenic bladder (nerve damage to the muscles and nerves of the bladder). The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activities of daily living (ADLs) were consistently provided for residents dependent on staff to perform oral care for 1 of 3 residents (1) reviewed for ADL care for dependent residents. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet care needs, poor oral hygiene, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy/procedure titled Mouth Care, revised 02/2018, showed oral care was to be provided to clean and freshen the mouth and to prevent oral infection. The procedure spelled out the steps to perform oral care and directed staff to document the care provided and if the resident refused. If the resident refused, staff were to document interventions provided and report to their supervisor. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 03/21/2024, documented Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment with non-traumatic brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient qualified nursing staff were available to provide care and services as evidenced by information provided in Resident/Surveyor interviews for 7 residents (Residents 84, 389, 14, 6, 41, 184 & 67) interviewed, and 9 staff (Staff Q, R, J, K, L, M, N, O & P) interviewed. The facility had insufficient staff to ensure residents received assistance with restorative services, meal tray delivery times, and Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) including showers and shaving. Additionally, the aides from the Restorative Nursing Program (RNP) department were removed from restorative nursing duties to cover direct care staff absences resulting in the RNPs not being done for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 48, 97 & 102) reviewed for RNP. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident Interviews/Observations> On 04/15/2024 at 10:55 AM, Resident 84 stated, I would prefer to be shaved daily. When asked if the aides or nurses have helped…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-22 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer and/or honor bathing choices for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 97, 102 & 125) reviewed for choices. The failure to promote and facilitate resident self-determination by offering and honoring residents' choices related to bathing frequency, placed residents at risk for poor hygiene, feelings of powerlessness, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 97 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the 04/09/2024 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS, an assessment tool), showed the resident had moderate cognitive impairment, no behaviors or rejection of care, and choices about bathing were, very important. On 04/16/2024 at 11:32 AM, Resident 97 indicated he was not provided a choice about how frequently he would be bathed. He said the facility just tells you that you get one and they don't ask about what the resident wants and stated, I would prefer three a week. I think that's fair since I was used to bathing daily. My…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate 3 of 4 allegations of abuse, neglect and/or misappropriation for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 97 and 105) whose investigation were reviewed. The failure to establish a timeline of events, ensure all staff who were present, involved and/or had knowledge of alleged incidents were reviewed, and to implement identified interventions to prevent reoccurrence, placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or continued abuse, neglect, and/or misappropriation of their property. Findings included . Resident 97 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. On 04/16/2024 at 11:35 AM, the resident said a little over a month ago, there was an incident with a prior roommate. The roommate allegedly came over to Resident 97's side of the room and threatened to shoot him. Resident 97 said they notified staff, and the roommate was moved to a different room. The facility's incident/accident reporting log showed the following entries for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-22 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure a resident's ability to participate in activities of daily living did not diminish for 3 of 3 residents (Resident 97, 102 & 48) reviewed for rehabilitation and restorative services. The failure to provide restorative programs at the frequency residents were assessed to require, placed residents at risk for avoidable decline in activities of daily living (ADL), and increased dependence on facility staff to meet their ADL needs. Findings included . 1) Resident 102 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the 02/08/2024 quarterly MDS, showed the resident was cognitively intact, had limited range of motion to one lower extremity and to both upper extremities, but received no restorative services during the assessment period. A restorative nursing care plan, revised 02/09/2024, directed staff to provide Resident 102's restorative ambulation program six times a week. Review of Resident 102's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to maintain the highest practicable level of well-being for 5 of 7 residents (Residents 239, 91, 155, 175 & 82) reviewed for bowel management and 1 of 1 resident (Resident 125) reviewed for a fluid restriction. The failure to initiate bowel care in accordance with physicians' orders and to accurately document, total, and assess fluid intake, placed residents at risk for fluid and electrolyte imbalances, nausea/vomiting, pain/discomfort and other health complications related to untreated constipation. Findings included . Review of the facility's Bowel Regimen, dated 11/03/2023, showed the following direction to nursing staff: a) If a resident goes 72 hours without a bowel movement (BM), administer Miralax 17 grams; b) If no results within 12 hours of Miralax administration, administer Milk of Magnesia (MOM) 30 ml; c) If no results six hours after administration of MOM, administer a bisacodyl suppository…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were safe from falls for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 171) reviewed for accidents and hazards. This failure placed residents at risk for fall related injury and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 171 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of dementia. Review of Resident 171's fall care plan showed the resident had falls on: 11/22/2023 (6:20 AM) 11/22/2023 (2:10 PM) 11/23/2023 (8:30 AM) 03/29/2024 (5:16 AM) 04/09/2024 (12:45 PM) 04/15/2024 (11:45 AM). Review of the medical record showed a safe assessment for a recliner chair, dated 04/05/2023, and no additional assessments were located. Review of an unwitnessed incident report, dated 03/29/2024, showed Resident 171 was found on the floor between the bed and recliner chair after rolling out of bed. Review of the care plan intervention dated 04/01/2024 showed bilateral assist bed handles on bed for sense of security and to help…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated when opened when required and expired drugs and biologicals were discarded in accordance with currently accepted professional standards of practice for 2 of 4 medication carts (G2 & G1) and 2 of 3 medication rooms (G2/H2 & A2/B2) reviewed. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured in locked storage for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 116 and 125) observed with medications at bedside. This placed residents at risk for accidentally taking another resident's medication and/or receiving expired/outdated medications and biologicals. Findings included . >Medication Rooms< <G2/H2> On 04/18/2024, at 5:57 AM, Staff Z, Registered Nurse (RN) 3, confirmed there was an opened and undated multiuse vial of tubersol (used to complete Tuberculosis testing) in the G2/H2 medication room refrigerator. Staff Z said the tubersol needed to be discarded because it was not dated when opened, and was only good for 28 days after opening. <A2/B2> On 04/18/2024 at 6:24 AM a bottle of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food at appetizing temperatures when reviewed for kitchen services. This failure placed residents at risk of lowered nutritional intake, potential weight loss, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Dining Room Service> On 04/17/2024 at 11:57 AM the start of tray line service for the lunch meal was observed. None of the items on the steam table had the temperatures taken prior to being served. Further observation showed that a stack of plates was next to the plate warmer and were not being warmed within the plate holder. At 12:24 PM, Staff EE, Lead Food Service Worker was observed plating food for each hallway using only the top insulator. At 12:53 PM, Staff EE, said they usually took the temperature of all food prior to service however they were in a rush and thought a different staff member had taken the temperatures. Staff EE said the facility did not use the bottom plate insulator because the top keeps the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-22 · tag F0849 — pattern
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and maintain a current hospice Plan of Care (POC) in collaboration with hospice, which identified what services were to be provided, and which delineated hospice versus facility responsibilities for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 137, 118, 37 & 87) reviewed for hospice. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving necessary care and services and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The facility's hospice contract titled, Hospice Services Agreement, dated 2017, under article 4.2 stated, hospice shall deliver to facility the following information: (a) the most recent individualized Hospice Plan of Care for each Hospice Patient. 1) Resident 137 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnoses including Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes uncontrollable movements), Lewy Body Dementia (a disease with abnormal deposits of protein in the brain), and a UTI (urinary tract infection). The Quarterly Assessment MDS…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in a respectful and dignified manner for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 87) reviewed for dignity. This failure placed residents at risk for being treated with a lack of dignity and respect and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . The facility's admissions packet, undated, documented, You have the right to be treated with respect and dignity. Resident 87 admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including hemiplegia (stroke that caused left sided weakness) affecting resident's left nondominant side, depression (mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness), and polyneuropathy (malfunction of many peripheral nerves throughout the body). The significant change Minimum Data Sets (MDS), a comprehensive assessment tool, dated 03/29/2024, documented Resident 87 was referred to hospice (end of life care). Resident 87 required maximum assistance with most activities of daily…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review the facility failed to accurately assess 1 of 2 sample residents (Resident 137) reviewed for change of condition. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving adequate and/or appropriate care and services. Findings included . Resident 137 was admitted on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes uncontrollable movements), Lewy Body Dementia (a disease with abnormal deposits of protein in the brain), and a UTI (urinary tract infection). The Quarterly Assessment MDS (Minimum Data Set), an assessment tool, dated 02/28/2024, indicated the resident was cognitively intact and was independent to needing supervision with ADLs (Activities of Daily Living). The medical record showed Resident 137 was admitted to hospice on 03/20/2024. A review of the Significant Change in Status Assessment MDS, dated [DATE], showed Resident 137 was not receiving hospice care. On 04/19/2024 at 8:32 AM Staff V, MDS Coordinator, said that hospice care should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans (CPs) were reviewed, revised, and accurately reflected residents' care needs for 4 of 52 sample residents (Residents 116, 97, 239 & 87) whose care plans were reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 239 readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the 04/10/2024 readmission skin assessment showed Resident 239 had a double lumen Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC/ a long, thin tube that's inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart) to the left upper arm. Review of Resident 239's comprehensive care plan, revised 04/11/2024, showed the type and location of the resident's venous access device and care instructions were not care planned. On 04/22/2024 at 8:23 AM, Staff B, Director of Nursing, said Resident 239's care plan should identify the type, location, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for 4 of 30 sample residents (Residents 239, 97, 116, 125) reviewed. Facility nurses' failure to obtain, accurately transcribe, follow, and clarify physician's orders when indicated, and to only sign for tasks that were completed, placed residents at risk for medication errors, delays in treatment, unmet care needs and potential negative outcomes. Findings included . 1) Resident 239 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the resident's physician's orders showed a 11/16/2022 order directing nurses to hold the resident's dose of metoprolol, carvedilol, atenolol and propranolol (blood pressure medications) for a systolic blood pressure (SBP) less than a 100, a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) less than 60 or a pulse less than 60. Review of the February and March 2024 Medication Administration Record showed on the following dates the resident's 8:00 AM metoprolol was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure urinary catheter (a tube inserted into the bladder which drains urine into a collection bag outside the body) tubing and drainage bags were covered, appropriately positioned off the floor, below the level of the bladder, and in a manner to ensure unobstructed urine flow for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 164 & 116) reviewed for urinary catheter use. These failures placed residents at risk for catheter associated urinary tract infections, bladder pain and other medically related consequences. Findings included . 1) Resident 164 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the 02/08/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, showed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, a diagnosis of obstructive uropathy and required the use of a indwelling urinary catheter. A catheter care plan, revised 02/20/2024, showed Resident 164 had a suprapubic catheter (a hollow flexible tube that is used to drain urine from the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-22 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure intravenous (IV) access devices were assessed, maintained and monitored in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Residents 239) reviewed for IV therapy. The facility failed to ensure Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC/ a long, thin tube that's inserted through a vein in the arm and passed through to the larger veins near the heart) orders included direction to perform weekly PICC dressing changes, replace needleless injection caps, assess, and record external length upon admission/insertion and then weekly and as needed. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff were trained and competent in the use of dial-a-flow infusion sets. These failures placed residents at risk for loss of vascular access, infection, IV medication errors and other potential negative outcomes. Findings included . Resident 239 readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of their current physician's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide consistent behavior monitoring for the use of psychotropic medications (affecting the mind) for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 175 and 82) reviewed for unnecessary medications and psychotropic medication side effects. Failure to develop target behaviors, adequately monitor the behaviors and interventions for effectiveness, and monitor changes in orthostatic blood pressures, placed the residents at risk for incorrect dose and duration of psychotropic medications, unwanted side effects, medical complications, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . 1) Resident 175's quarterly minimum data set (MDS), a required assessment tool, dated 03/28/2024, showed Resident 175 was diagnoses including (a neurocognitive disorder). It further showed Resident 175 received an antipsychotic medication on a routine basis. A provider's order dated 03/27/2024 showed that Resident 175 was prescribed an antipsychotic medication to be provided once…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility staff failed to notify a provider when moderate and severe medication interactions were alerted on new medication orders for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for medications. This failure placed residents at risk for adverse impact on physical health and well-being and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 02/02/2024, documented Resident 1 was cognitively intact and required supervision to maximum assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLS). An order note, dated 02/21/2024 at 12:51 PM, documented a severe drug interaction between omeprazole (medication often give for acid reflux) and clopidogrel (medication used to help prevent blood clots) potentially causing an increased risk of a cardiovascular event. Review of Resident 1's medical record did not show documentation that a physician was notified of the severe…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-09 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain and provide a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for homelike environment. This failure placed residents at risk for a diminished quality of life. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 07/27/2023, documented Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment, behaviors that interfered with care and was visually impaired. On 10/23/2023 at 2:27 PM, Collateral Contact (CC 1) said they had an ongoing concern regarding Resident 1's care. CC 1 said they frequently found the room smelled of urine and was messy with bagged, dirty laundry left on the floor. CC 1 said staff were to clean Resident 1's room when he was out for meals but they did not feel that was happening. On 11/07/2023 at 1:39 PM, Resident 1's room was observed with substantial debris on the floor which resembled food, pieces of papers and spilled liquid.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bathing and nail care was provided on a consistent basis for 1 of 5 residents sampled residents (Resident 1) dependent on staff assistance for activities of daily living (ADLs). This failure placed residents at risk for poor hygiene, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 07/27/2023, documented Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment, behaviors that interfered with care, was visually impaired and required extensive assistance for staff to complete bathing and personal hygiene activities. Resident 1's care plan, initiated 11/22/2019, documented Resident 1 was to receive a weekly shower on Mondays and nail care was to be completed on shower days. The Point of Care (POC) response history for the task of bathing was reviewed for 09/28/2023 to 11/07/2023 and showed that Resident 1 received 2 showers. The POC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-14 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents who experienced dementia-related sleep disorders and Sundown syndrome (late day/evening increase in behaviors) received care and services to attain the highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being when it did not identify and implement individualized, person-centered interventions, document the results of those interventions and consistently implement the care plan over time and across shifts for 3 of 4 residents reviewed for dementia care. These failures placed residents at risk for risk for unmet needs for non-medication interventions when behaviors increased, unnecessary medication and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . RESIDENT 1 Resident 1 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia, anxiety and insomnia. August 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) documented Resident 1 received anti-anxiety medication in the morning and afternoon for targeted symptoms of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$23,920 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $23,920 — penalty dated 2025-07-02
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-06-14 for 3 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF VETEOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 03/01/2007
GILBERT, SOLOMONIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 05/22/2023
MURRAY, DANIELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/16/2021
PUENTE, DAVIDIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 02/01/2023
FANG, AARONIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/07/2024
LYSOBEY, MATTHEWIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/20/2023
WESTHOFF, TERRANCEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 10 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$32.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 26%Medicare 1%Other / private 72%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$528per resident / day
operating cost
$16,039per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$498per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505517. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next