No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Caroline Kline Galland Home

7500 Seward Park Avenue South, Seattle, WA 98118 · Non profit - Corporation · 205 certified beds · (206) 725-8800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (206) 725-8800 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Mar 2026Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (35) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8444 Rainier Ave S · (206) 722-8444 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
4219 S Othello St · (206) 620-2400 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
7631 Rainier Ave S · (206) 588-2357 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Atlantic City Park Seattle · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
4837 S Fontanelle St · (206) 339-1280

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased17.2%14.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.0%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms93.8%17.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.4%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.4%17.2%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication4.3%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.5%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.1%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control24.6%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table13.9%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%1.3%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine83.0%82.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.6%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit7.7%13.4%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.401.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.691.521.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 553 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

65.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
7.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
66.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.18hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 66.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 256 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 56% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF65.9%CMS range 60.6–69.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF7.5%CMS range 6.1–9.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge66.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge55.1%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge57.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified93.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting88.2%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 5.4–10.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.851.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.30
RN hours/ resident / day
0.69
LPN hours/ resident / day
4.23
Aide hours/ resident / day
6.21
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.04
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 205 beds and averages 193.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.21 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.30 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.23 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.47 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.52 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.40 to 1.04 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-04)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-21)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

35 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 25 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2026-05-28 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to electronically submit complete and accurate direct care staffing information to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS - a federal agency managing health care programs and health insurance standards) for Quarter 4 (October 1, 2025 to December 31, 2025) reviewed for Payroll Based Journal (PBJ - mandatory reporting of staffing information based on payroll data) submission. This failure affected the accuracy of Nursing Home (NH) staffing level data collected by CMS and had the potential to impact the provision of resident care and services.Findings included.Review of the facility's 02/06/2026 CMS PBJ - Upload Data File confirmation page showed the data file was sent by the facility to CMS on 02/06/2026 at 12:50 PM. The confirmation page showed the submission was received and would be checked for errors within 24 hours. The confirmation page provided a reminder that the facility should check back for a system generated PBJ Final File Validation Report within 24 hours to verify the quarterly PBJ data was reflected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-04 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure resident concerns were dealt with timely, verbal grievances were identified as such, resident rights were promoted periodically as required, and residents were provided the opportunity to make a grievance anonymously for 1 of 1 Resident Council groups reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet needs, frustration, untimely resolution of grievances, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.<Policy>According to the facility policy titled, Resident and Family Grievances, dated 2026, a resident or family member may voice a grievance to staff. The policy showed the Administrator was the Grievance Official. The policy showed verbal or written complaints were acceptable forms of communicating grievances. The policy showed resident grievances could be communicated to any staff and the grievance would be documented on a grievance form and communicated with the grievance official.<Resident Council>Review of the facility's September 2025 through February 2026 Resident Council minute notes showed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-04 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately assess 4 of 4 residents (Residents 59, 68, 123, & 186) reviewed for restraints. Failure to ensure resident assessments were completed accurately on the Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life.Findings included.<Resident 59>According to the 11/20/2025 Quarterly MDS Resident 59 had no memory impairment. The MDS showed Resident 59 had diagnoses of autoimmune disorder and depression. The MDS showed no restraints used for Resident 59.During observations on 02/27/2026 at 11:37 AM and 03/03/2026 at 1:19 PM showed Resident 59 with a seat belt latched, holding them in their wheelchair.<Resident 68>According to the 02/02/2026 Quarterly MDS Resident 68 had no memory impairment. The MDS showed Resident 68 had diagnoses of spinal stenosis at the cervical region (narrowing of the spinal canal causing pain, numbness, and weakness), anxiety and depression. The MDS showed no restraints used for Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview the facility failed to conduct resident and/or resident representative involved care conferences within seven days of each quarterly assessment for 4 of 7 residents (Residents 54, 68, 36, & 123) and failed to ensure resident Care Plans (CP) were updated as needed for 3 of 7 residents (Residents 190, 123 & 4) reviewed for care planning. These failures placed residents at risk for inconsistent and/or inadequate care and treatment, unmet care needs, unnecessary care, frustration, other negative health outcomes, and a diminished quality of care. Findings included .<Facility Policy>Review of the facility's 01/2025 policy titled, Care Plan Conference, showed residents and/or their representatives would be offered a care conference at the time of care plan review or as needed.Review of the facility's 04/2025 policy titled, Care Plans- Comprehensive Person-Centered showed that the facility would revise CPs as information about the resident's condition changed and would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure the following: appropriate delegation of nursing tasks to non licensed staff; preparation and administration of insulin in accordance with manufacturer instructions; clarification and following of physician orders; and accurate documentation of nursing tasks for 5 of 35 sampled residents (Residents 218, 7, 8, 205, and 206) and 3 supplemental residents (Residents 225, 226, and 171). These failures placed residents at risk for medication errors, delayed treatment, and adverse outcomes.Findings included .<Improper Delegation of Nursing Tasks> <Resident 225> Review of Resident 225's June 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed a 06/25/2025 physician order to start a chemotherapy drug (strong medication to damage cancer cells and prevent its growth) once a day on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday each week. Review of Resident 225's June and July 2025 MAR showed the following staff administered the chemotherapy drug:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided meaningful, life enriching activities for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 213, 215, 217, & 212) reviewed for activities. This failure placed residents at risk for boredom and a diminished quality of life. Findings included <Facility Policy>According to the facility's December 2025 Activity Policy and Procedure, upon admission to the facility, residents would be asked if they wanted to engage in activity while on the rehabilitation or not, and ask what the resident's interest were. The policy showed when residents moved from the Transitional Care unit to a Long Term Care unit, facility staff would complete an initial activity assessment, after which a Care Plan (CP) would be developed. The policy showed staff would document activity participation, goals, and interventions in the CP, quarterly activity notes, quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) preference reviews, and as needed. The policy showed when a resident exercised their right to refuse to participate, it would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain provider orders, complete safety assessments, and obtain consents for the use of seatbelts for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 59, 68, 123, & 186) reviewed for the use of physical restraints. This failure placed the residents at risk of injury, unmet needs, and diminished quality of life.Findings included.<Policy>According to the facility policy titled, Restraint Free Environment, dated 04/2025, the facility was responsible for the appropriateness of the determination to use a physical restraint. The policy defined a seat belt in a chair, that prevented the resident from rising, was a physical restraint. The policy showed before a resident was physically restrained, the facility would determine the presence of a specific medical symptom that would require the use of the restraint. The policy showed the facility would document how the restraint would treat the medical symptom(s), the length of time the restraint was anticipated to be used, who may apply the restraint, the time and frequency the restraint…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-04 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided the portion size they were assessed to require for 2 (Residents 7 & 17) of 36 sample residents reviewed and 4 supplementary residents (Residents 224, 22, 202, and 223). This failure placed residents at risk for hunger and weight loss. Findings included. <Facility Policy>According to the facility's revised 02/2026 Nutrition Assessment Policy, within 14 days of admission, the facility would complete a nutritional assessment and implement nutritional interventions as needed with the purpose of restoring or optimizing the resident's nutritional health. <Tray Line/Meal Service>Review of the schedule menu for 03/02/2026 showed the regular entree served that lunch was penne pasta with [NAME] sauce. The menu showed residents who required a mechanically soft altered texture entree would be provided with a mechanically softened version of the same meal. The menu did not show what size portion to provide.Observation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure meals were prepared in sanitary conditions for 1 of 1 main kitchens reviewed, failed to ensure food was reheated in unit kitchens on 2 of 5 units (100 East unit and 200 East unit), and failed to reheat lunch meals for 1 of 2 (Resident 213) resident's that required feeding assistance. These failures placed residents at risk for eating contaminated or unsafe food, foodborne illnesses and food not palatable according to resident's preferences.Findings included .According to the facility's 02/15/2023 Food Safety Requirements policy, food safety practices would be followed throughout the facility, including employee hygienic practices. The policy showed staff would wash their hands according to facility practices and when previously cooked foods were reheated, staff must ensure a temperature of 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F) was reached.<Food temperature> According to a 02/22/2026 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool), Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to allow 3 (Residents 8, 186, & 123) of 6 residents reviewed for choices, the right to make choices regarding important daily routines including accommodating preferences for the frequency and/or type of bathing and food choices. The facility's failure to accommodate resident choice placed these residents at risk for a diminished quality of life.Findings included .<Bathing> <Resident 8> According to the 12/14/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 8 was cognitively intact with clear speech, able to make self-understood, and understood others. This MDS showed Resident 8 was dependent on staff for shower/bathing needs. According to the revised 12/10/2025 Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Care Plan (CP) Resident 8 required one-person substantial assistance from staff with a weekly shower. In an interview on 02/26/2026 at 10:47 AM, Resident 8 stated the facility staff did not give them a choice how often to shower.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 25 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate a fall for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident 190) reviewed for accidents. Facility failure to complete thorough investigations placed residents at risk for further accidents, negative health outcomes, and poor quality of life.Findings included.<Policy>According to the facility policy titled, Fall Policy dated 04/2025, the facility would complete a thorough investigation after each incidence of a resident falling.According to the undated facility neurological assessment protocol, neurological assessments should be implemented immediately in the event of unwitnessed fall or if resident hits their head. Neurologic assessment protocol states that neurological assessments should be completed every 15 minutes for the first hour, every 30 minutes for two hours, every two hours for four hours, then every shift for two days.<Resident 190>According to the 07/11/2025 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a process to determine if a potential nursing home resident had mental health/intellectual disability needs which required further assessment/treatment) assessment was accurate to reflect the residents' mental health conditions for 2 of 6 residents (Resident 190 & 52) reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health needs.Findings included.<Policy>Review of the facility's 11/2025 PASRR policy showed the facility would refer any resident who exhibited a newly evident mental disorder or related condition to the state mental health authority for a Level II resident review.<Resident 190> According to the 07/11/2025 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS – an assessment tool) Resident 190 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Vascular Dementia (a degenerative brain disease), Traumatic Brain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to assist residents with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs - personal hygiene, grooming, bathing,) for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 6 & 217) reviewed who were assessed to be dependent on staff for ADLs including oral care, nail care, and bathing. The failure to provide ADL assistance to dependent residents as required left residents at risk for poor hygiene, diminished feelings of self-worth, and other negative health outcomes.Findings included.<Facility Policy>The facility's Activity of Daily Living policy, revised 04/2025, showed the facility would provide the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal, and oral hygiene to the resident who was unable to carry out ADLs independently.<Resident 6> According to the 12/23/2026 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 6 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnosis of cancer, heart failure, and urinary retention. The MDS showed Resident 6…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were monitored and received the treatment they were assessed to require for 2 of 3 (Residents 3 & 7) residents for edema (swelling) management and blood pressure monitoring. The failure to monitor and implement interventions for edema management and blood pressure management placed residents at risk for decline in medical status, quality of life related to unmet care needs and discomfort. Findings included .<Facility Policy>According to the facility's undated Resident handbook and Family guide, Notification of Changes section in the manual showed the facility would immediately inform the resident, consult with their provider and notify the resident representative whenever there was a significant change in the Resident's physical, mental or psychosocial status, that is, a deterioration in health, mental, or psychosocial status in either life threatening conditions or clinical complications.<Resident 3> According to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services for catheter care for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 54) reviewed for Urinary Catheters (a tube inserted to drain the bladder). This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, diminished quality of life, and poor health outcomes.Findings included.<Facility Policy>According to the undated facility policy titled, Indwelling Catheter Care and Maintenance, the facility would perform routine monitoring of indwelling catheters to ensure that residents receive appropriate catheter care and maintain dignity when indwelling catheters are in use.<Resident 54>According to the 11/28/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 54 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Multiple Sclerosis (a degenerative brain disease), Neurogenic Bladder (loss of bladder control), and Functional Quadriplegia (paralysis). The MDS showed Resident 54 had an indwelling catheter.Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: provide medically related social services to attain and/or maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of residents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 190) reviewed for nutrition; assist residents in obtaining resolution regarding refusals of treatment and care for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 190) reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed residents at risk of unmet social service needs, negative health outcomes, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .<Policy>According to the facility policy titled, Resident Rights Regarding Treatment and Advanced Directives, revised 2025, the facility would document refusals in the resident's health record, the reason for the refusals, provider/ Interdisciplinary Team (IDT - Social Services, Nursing, Therapy if therapy services are being provided, Dietary, and Activities) notification of the refusal, and resident education of the risks associated with the refusals of care.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 190) reviewed for nutrition, received necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice to treat broken or missing teeth and oral/dental pain. This failure placed all other residents at risk for lack of dental services, unmet care needs, negative health outcomes, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.<Policy> According to the undated facility policy titled Dental Services the facility required staff to assess residents' dental status as part of routine nursing and MDS assessments and make appropriate referrals to facility providers or dental providers.<Resident 190>According to the 07/11/2025 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 190 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The MDS showed Resident 190 had obvious or likely cavities or broken teeth, and mouth or facial pain. The MDS showed Resident 190 had a diagnosis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: ensure staff followed contact precautions (a type of isolation precaution used to prevent the spread of infections transmitted by direct or indirect contact) for 2 (2 East unit and 1 East unit) of 4 units reviewed for contact precautions; ensure staff used appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE - disposable barriers such as gloves, eyewear and gowns used to prevent exposure to infectious materials) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 68) and 2 supplemental residents (4 & 142) reviewed for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - an infection control intervention designed to reduce the transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms in long-term care settings); and ensure staff used appropriate Hand Hygiene (Staff P & BBB) during wound and catheter care. These failures placed residents and staff at risk for exposure to and development of contagious, communicable infectious diseases.Findings included .<Facility Policy>Review of the facility's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program that included implementation of the Antibiotic (ABO) Stewardship Program to promote appropriate use of ABOs and reduce the risk of unnecessary ABO use for 2 (Resident 10 & 68) of 5 residents reviewed for ABO use. This failure placed residents at risk for potential adverse outcomes associated with the inappropriate and/or unnecessary use of ABOs.Findings included.<Facility Policy>Review of the facility's Infection Surveillance, Antimicrobial Stewardship, and Reporting policy, revised 12/30/2025, showed the infection preventionist would survey community or hospital acquired infections and facility acquired infections on an ongoing basis through bedside observation, clinical chart review and reports, laboratory reports, resident and staff interviews, email communications, and by other means. This policy showed ABO medications would be monitored for appropriate use. The policy showed staff…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system by which residents received required written notices at the time of transfer/discharge, or as soon as practicable for 3 (Residents 133, 17, & 142) of 6 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Failure to ensure written notification was provided to the resident and/or the resident's representative, in a language and manner they understood, placed residents at risk for not having an opportunity to make informed decisions about transfers/discharges. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's undated Transferor Discharge policy, for residents transferring/discharging emergently, notice of the transfer would be provided in writing to the resident or their representative as soon as practicable. The policy showed this notice would include contact information for the Long-Term Care Ombudsman. <Resident 133> Review of Resident 133's 05/29/2024 and 08/09/2024 Discharge Minimum Data Sets (MDS - an assessment tool) showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a process to determine if a potential nursing home resident had mental health/intellectual disability needs which required further assessment/treatment) assessment was accurate to reflect the resident's mental health condition and refer the residents to the appropriate state authority for Level II evaluation and determination for 5 of 9 (Resident 159, 27, 48, 169, & 115) residents reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed residents at risk for inappropriate nursing home placement and /or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health needs. Findings included . <Resident 159> According to an 08/12/2024 Significant Change Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 159 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including an anxiety disorder and depression which required the use of psychotropic medications during the assessment period. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-11-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 residents (Resident 159, 142, & 45) reviewed for unnecessary medications were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications and monitored for behaviors. Failure to discontinue as needed psychotropic medications after 14 days and to identify/monitor target behaviors for as needed antipsychotic medications placed residents at risk to receive unnecessary psychotropic medications and experience adverse side effects. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the Psychoactive Medication Program policy revised March 2024, showed as needed psychotropic drugs would be used only if the medication was necessary to treat a specific, diagnosed condition that was documented in the clinical record, and for a limited duration of 14 days. The policy showed the facility would document nonpharmacological interventions and target behavior monitoring for each resident on psychotropic medications. <Resident 159> According to an 11/02/2024 Quarterly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement an effective Infection Control Program for 4 of 5 units (Units 300 East, 300 North, 300 South, & 100 East) The failure to: ensure facility staff sanitized glucometers (a blood sugar monitoring device); ensure food and drinks were handled in accordance with infection control standards when being distributed on the unit; ensure staff used Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) when required for residents with infectious diseases; perform hand hygiene as required; use appropriate infection control standards during incontinence care and wound care (Residents 156 & 119); and ensure resident rooms were free from staff property; placed residents at risk for exposure to infectious materials, communicable diseases, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's revised 09/06/2024 Infection Control Manual, an effective Infection Control Program required the cooperation of all staff, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided care and services in a dignified manner for 7 (Residents 106, 12, 144, 123, 45, 123, & 156) of 36 sample residents reviewed. The failure to: provide dignified toileting assistance (Residents 106, 12, & 144), ensure staff sat when feeding residents (Resident 45), provide bodily privacy when transporting residents to and from the shower room (Resident 123), and ensure catheter bags (bags that collect urine from tubing placed in the body to assist with urinary drainage) were covered to obscure their contents (Resident 156) placed residents at risk for undignified care and a diminished sense of self-worth. Findings included . <Policy> According to the facility's undated General Rights policy, all residents had a right to a dignified existence, self-determination, and access to services inside the facility. The policy showed facility staff would treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each in a manner that would promote maintenance or enhancement of their quality of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to develop and/or implement comprehensive Care Plans (CPs) for 7 (Residents 88, 83, 81, 119, 115, 159, & 429) of 36 sample residents whose CPs were reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, in appropriate care, and frustration. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's reviewed January 2024 Care Plans - Comprehensive Person Centered policy showed the facility would develop a comprehensive, person-centered CP to address each resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs . <Resident 88> According to the 09/13/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 88 was assessed with a severe memory impairment. The MDS showed Resident 88 depended on staff assistance to move in bed, was at risk for developing pressure ulcers and used a pressure reducing device on their bed. The MDS showed Resident 88 was rarely/never understood and rarely/never understood others in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Care Plans (CPs) were updated as needed to reflect changes in resident's care needs for 5 (Residents 45, 83, 156, 106, 169) of 36 sample residents whose CPs were reviewed and failed to provide care conferences as required for 2 (Residents 134 & 17) of 36 sample residents whose CPs were reviewed. The failure to update CPs with changes in residents' health status placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, unnecessary care, and frustration. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's January 2024 Care plans - Comprehensive person centered policy, CPs would be revised as information about the residents and the residents' conditions change. <CP Revision> <Resident 45> According to a 10/03/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 45 had minimal difficulty with hearing while using a hearing appliance, had no wandering behaviors, and was assessed to be dependent on staff for transfers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were clarified for 2 of 36 sampled residents reviewed (Residents 88 & 144), and failed to ensure medications were administered timely for 1 of 5 sample residents (Resident 432) observed during medication pass. These failures placed residents at risk for ineffective treatments, inappropriate medications, and delayed treatment. Findings included . <Clarifying Orders> <Resident 88> According to the 09/13/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set, Resident 88 was assessed to have a severe memory impairment, and diagnoses including anxiety and depression. The MDS showed Resident 88 took an antidepressant medication. Review of the November 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed Resident 88 had a 07/31/2019 physician's order for an antidepressant medication, give 1 tablet once a day for depression/anxiety. In an interview on 11/21/2024 at 10:48 AM, Staff B (Director of Nursing) reviewed Resident 88's antidepressant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) related to toileting, cleanliness, and grooming for 2 (Residents 106 & 119) of 7 sample residents reviewed for ADLs. The failure to provide residents who were dependent on staff assistance the toileting, dressing, and shaving assistance they required placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene, long facial hair, embarrassment, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's undated Activities of Daily Livings policy, the facility would provide ADLs in accordance with residents' comprehensive assessment, Care Plan (CP), and resident preferences to ensure residents' ADL abilities did not diminish unless a decline in function was unavoidable. <Toileting> <Resident 106> According to a 09/26/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 106 was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene. The MDS showed Resident 106…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure activity programs met the needs of each resident for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 106 & 142) reviewed for activities. Failure to provide meaningful activities left residents at risk for boredom, frustration, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Policy> According to a facility policy titled, Activity Policy and Procedures, revised 08/2018, showed staff would provide meaningful activities to residents to address their physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The policy showed activities would be offered in a variety of formats, various times of day, and each day of the week taking into consideration each individual's abilities, needs, and preferences. The policy showed activity staff would document residents' attendance in activities in the residents health records under a progress note. The policy showed residents would receive assistance needed to participate in activities such as staff escort to/from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 3 of 36 sampled residents (Residents 429, 142, & 169) reviewed for care and services, received the necessary care and services they required in accordance with professional standards of practice. The facility failed to monitor resident's hypo/hyperglycemia (high and low blood sugar levels) symptoms and follow bowel management protocols that placed residents at risk for delays in treatment, potential decline in health, and other negative health outcomes. <Facility Policy> According to the facility's undated, Principals and Practices Glycemic Management in Diabetic Residents policy, the licensed nurse would identify signs and symptoms of hypo/hyperglycemia, respond promptly in providing appropriate interventions to restore the resident's blood sugar level, prevent reoccurrences of hypo/hyperglycemia, and prevent complications. The policy showed the Care Plan (CP) would establish measurable goals for the resolution for the problem,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide Restorative Nursing Program (RNP), rehabilitative treatment/services and to follow the physician orders for 3 of 5 residents (Residents 27, 134, & 144) reviewed for limited Range of Motion (ROM) and mobility to ensure the residents maintained and/or improved their highest level of functioning. This failure placed residents at risk of further decline in ROM, loss of function, and/or permanent immobility. Findings included . <Resident 27> According to a 09/06/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 27 had limited ROM to both arms and legs. Resident 27 required total assistance from staff with personal hygiene, bed mobility, transfers, dressing, and toileting. The MDS showed Resident 27 had no rejection of care during the assessment period. Review of Resident 27's November 2024 physician orders directed staff to apply a palm protector to Resident 27's right hand contracture and keep the palm protector on at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-21 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 (Resident 45 & 169) of 5 sampled residents, reviewed for vaccinations, were up to date on the current recommendations from the Center for Disease and Control and Prevention (CDC) related to pneumococcal vaccinations. This failure placed residents at risk for contracting pneumonia, with their associated complications of infection. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's revised 09/06/2024 Resident Vaccination Program policy, all newly admitted residents would be assessed for eligibility for the pneumonia vaccine. The policy showed residents would be educated about the benefits of the vaccine and the appropriate pneumonia vaccine would be offered. <Resident 45> According to a 10/3/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was up to date with their Pneumococcal vaccinations. Review of Resident 45's records showed two historical entries under the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure expired medication and medical supplies were disposed timley for 4 of 4 medication rooms (East 2A, East 2B, North, & East 1) reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving medications with decreased or no potency, and use of medical supplies with compromised integrity. Findings included . <East 1 Medication Room> Observation on 08/02/2023 at 1:20 PM showed two boxes of safety needles expired on 05/31/2020, two boxes of lancets (equipment used to check blood sugar) expired on 12/07/2020, a box of disposable viral test kits expired 09/14/2022, and a bottle of local anesthetic expired 12/2022. These items were dispersed throughout the room. In an interview on 08/02/2023 at 1:35 PM, Staff H (Charge Nurse) stated the expired supplies should be removed from the medication room prior to the items expiring. <East 3 Medication Room> Observation on 08/02/2023 at 1:00 PM showed two urinary catheters (a tube to assist in bladder emptying) expired on 12/28/2022, extension tubing intended for urinary catheters…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident safety from accidents and hazards for 3 of 4 (Residents 149, 27 & 104) residents reviewed for falls. The failure to determine the basic factors that caused resident falls and implement interventions related to the identified cause, placed residents at risk for further falls, significant injuries, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 149> The 05/02/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed Resident 149 was admitted for a fall with pelvic fractures. Resident 149 was assessed to have memory impairment, difficulty making decisions, inattention, disorganized thinking, and worsening behaviors impacting their personal safety. Resident 149 was assessed with moderately impaired vision (not able to see newspaper headings but can identify objects). Review of the 01/04/2023 Fall Risk Care Plan (CP) showed Resident 149 was at increased risk of falls related to decreased functional mobility, weakness, and poor balance. The 01/04/2023 fall CP interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure indwelling urinary catheter (a tube to empty the bladder) care met infection control standards for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 12) reviewed for catheters. The failure to 1) review the risks and benefits of placing the catheter bag on the floor per Resident 12's preference, 2) update the care plan and 3) implement interventions to prevent contamination and Urinary Tract Infections (UTI), placed Resident 12 at risk for continued UTIs, sepsis (a blood infection) and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The undated policy titled Indwelling Catheter Care and Maintenance, directed staff to perform routine maintenance and continued monitoring of residents with indwelling catheters and to ensure that residents received appropriate catheter care. The policy showed if a resident's preference went against infection control policies, it was important to prioritize the safety and well-being of the resident and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
ALHADEFF, JEANIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/18/2008
ALLMO, JACKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/18/2008
BENOLIEL, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/18/2008
BRIDGE, MARCIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2019
COHEN, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/18/2008
DIAMENT, TREAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
DUBEY, LYNNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/17/2012
FAIN, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/01/2017
FISHER, IRENEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/17/2012
FRIEDMAN, ELIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
KANE, MARKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/18/2008
MARTIN, ALVINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/18/2008
MIREL, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 12/01/2017
MORGAN, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/18/2008
PIHA, JEFFIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2019
QUINT, BRIANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/18/2008
RIFKIN, JAYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/15/2015
ROSEN, DOUGLASIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/18/2008
SHAPIRO, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2019
SIMON, ROBERTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/17/2012
STEINMAN, ALLANIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/18/2008
SULMAN, BARBARAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/18/2008
WIVIOTT, DOUGIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/15/2015
ZANA, ELANAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
AN, CHRISTINEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2010
BERG, SONJAIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/01/2025
COHEN, JEFFREYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2006
GROSCOST, TRACYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/04/2014
RYAN, RACHELLEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/02/2013
SHERIDAN, ERINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2021
CONSOLIDATED BILLING SERVICES INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2007
OPTIMUS SENIOR HEALTH CONSULTANTS PLLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2022
BABADZHANOVA, LILIYAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/22/2016
LIN, JAMESIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 50 rows in the source record cover these 34 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$51.1M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.6M
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 46%Medicare 12%Other / private 42%

This home reported $2.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$744per resident / day
operating cost
$22,614per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$731per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505442. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next