Fircrest Nursing Facility
15230-15th Northeast, Seattle, WA 98155 · Government - State · 110 certified beds · (206) 361-3511 Medicaid only — no Medicare
On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (36) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 4 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.0% | 14.2% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.8% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.3% | 1.0% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.7% | 1.6% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.0% | 17.7% | 6.5% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 9.9% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.0% | 2.6% | 3.3% | check this* — see note marked star below the table |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 8.6% | 17.2% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 6.3% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.5% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 4.4% | 22.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 30.6% | 15.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.93 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.36 | 1.52 | 1.80 | better |
* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 86.1 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 24 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 9.32 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 7.38 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 50% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
36 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 26 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · E2025-11-07 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written bed hold notice at the time of transfer to the hospital for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 1, 2 & 86), and failed to provide a written transfer notice and notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (an advocate for residents of nursing homes who protect and promote resident rights under federal and state law and regulations) of the transfer, as required for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 2), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed while in the hospital, protection of resident rights during transfers, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Nursing Facility Bed Hold Policy, dated 04/11/2023, showed, In case of an emergency transfer to hospital or hospital admission, the guardian will be provided prompt notification of this policy and that the Ombudsman will be notified utilizing the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-07 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 4 of 18 residents (Residents 4, 12, 9 & 5), reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool). The failure to ensure resident assessments were completed accurately on the MDS regarding pressure ulcer (injury to the skin caused by prolonged pressure), antipsychotic (medications used to treat symptoms of psychotic [mental health condition characterized by a loss of touch with reality]) medication review, restraint (devices or methods that limit a resident's freedom of movement), and diagnosis placed the residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. According to the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents) Version 1.20.1, dated in October 2025, showed, .an accurate assessment requires collecting information from multiple sources, some of which are…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were stored and handled in accordance with professional standards of food safety for 1 of 2 kitchen walk-in refrigerators (Kitchen Main Preparation Walk-In Refrigerator), and 2 of 10 staff (Staff M & N), reviewed for food services. The failure to cover and label food items in the kitchen walk-in refrigerator and perform hand hygiene when assisting residents with their meals placed the residents at risk for food borne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages), cross contamination, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Facility Food Storage and Meal Preparation Policy, revised in December 2024 showed that the facility is committed to upholding safe food handling, storage, and consumption protocols for the meals provided to our clients and residents. Food Storage: Retain food in its original packaging until needed.If transferred, use food-safe containers, and clearly mark them with contents and date. The policy further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene and proper glove use were followed for 2 of 16 Staff (Staff N & K) and failed to ensure Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- precaution to protect residents from Multidrug-Resistant Organism [MDRO-a germ that is resistant to medications that treat infections]) practices were followed for 2 of 13 Staff (Staff O & I), reviewed for infection control. These failures placed the residents, staff, and visitors at an increased risk for infection and related complications.Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, dated March 2023 showed, the purpose was to avoid the spread of infection through cross-contamination. The policy further showed, Hand Hygiene performed before .applying gloves . and Hands hygiene performed after.handing [handling] contaminated objects.removing gloves. HAND HYGIENE/GLOVE USESTAFF NObservation on 11/03/2025 at 1:34 PM, showed Staff N, Attendant Counselor 1 (AC 1), was outside the laundry room with a double compartment cart in front…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-07 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an informed consent explaining the risks/benefits for psychotropic medication (alters mood, perception, and behavior) was completed prior to medication administration for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 5), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents and/or their representative at risk of not being fully informed of the risks and benefits before making decisions about medications prior to administration.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Use of Psychoactive Medications [used to control or manage challenging behaviors], revised on September 2021, showed, As appropriate, the client, parent and/or client representative, shall be provided with information on the psychoactive medications used or proposed in their individual case, and assisted in understanding the information supplied. Informed consent is required when psychoactive medications are used.Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a care plan for 2 of 18 residents (Residents 4 & 86), reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The failure to implement the care plans for tube feeding (a way to deliver liquid nutrition through a flexible tube into the body) and indwelling urinary catheter (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Individual Plan of Care Process Requirements, dated 12/10/2024, showed the process for Individual Plan of Care for residents included, Care Plan Development which establishes a course of action that moves a resident toward a specific goal utilizing individual resident strengths and interdisciplinary expertise; crafting the how of resident care. It further showed the process of Care Plan Implementation which included putting that course of action.into motion by staff knowledgeable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide respiratory care in accordance with accepted professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 83), reviewed for respiratory care. The failure to change the AIRVO 2 (a humidifier with an integrated flow generator that delivers warmed, humidified, high-flow air and/or oxygen) chamber placed the resident at risk for respiratory infections, and related complications.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Preparation and Administration of Medication and Treatment, dated July 2025, showed, To ensure the prompt and safe administration of medication and treatments ordered for clients.Review of a face sheet printed on 11/03/2025 showed that Resident 83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included tracheostomy (a surgical hole in the windpipe that helps with breathing) status.Review of Resident 83's November 2025 Treatment Administration Record (TAR) showed an order to Change Airvo…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed the resident at risk for serious harm and injury, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled, Detection and Prevention of Abuse, Neglect and Financial Exploitation, revised on January 2024, showed [name of facility]'s highest priority is to maintain the safety and well-being of all clients [residents].Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included profound intellectual disabilities (severe learning disabilities requiring extensive support and care in all areas of daily life).Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 07/25/2025 showed Resident 1 had severe cognitive impairment and required total care with activities of daily living.Review of Resident 1's comprehensive care plan printed on 08/14/2025 showed an intervention to provide 1:1 [one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure baseline care plan (initial instructions on necessary care until a comprehensive care plan is established) was accurate for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 2), reviewed for resident records. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of care.Findings included.Review of a face sheet printed on 08/14/2025 showed Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for respite care (short-term care).Review of a baseline care plan printed on 08/14/2025 showed Resident 2's Recreation (Activity) care plan had another resident's name in it. Further review of the baseline care plan showed, [other person's name] requires colostomy [a surgical opening for the large intestine through the abdomen for stool elimination] care. had been included in Resident 2's self-care deficit care plan.Review of the physician's progress note dated 07/24/2025 did not show Resident 1 had a colostomy.In an interview and joint record review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely reporting of an injury of unknown source to the State Agency for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse/neglect reporting. This failure placed the resident at risk for potential unidentified and ongoing abuse and lack of protection from abuse. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy subject titled, Detection and Prevention of Abuse and Neglect, dated 05/01/2019, showed, Guidance is provided by NF [Nursing Facility] Purple Book, DDA [Developmental Disabilities Administration] policy, state and federal regulation. Review of the facility's policy subject titled, Protection from Abuse: Mandatory Reporting, issued on 07/2024, showed All administration employees, contractors, volunteers, interns, and work-study students must report every incident of observed, reported, or suspected abuse, neglect, exploitation, and abandonment, as well as injuries of unknown origin. The policy further showed, Immediately meant there should be no delay between reporter awareness of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 26 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-06 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to follow the plan of care and provide adequate supervision for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1), reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed the residents at risk for further fall, injury, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Fall Protocol, revised on 01/23/2023, showed Falls require prompt response to determine cause, injury, and adherence to Care Plan (CP) or Individualized Habilitation Plan (IHP) expectations. The policy showed that if a client [resident] is unable to get up from a fall they will remain where they are until a nurse comes to assess them. The policy further showed that the Attendant Counselors (AC/Certified Nursing Assistant [CNA]) were responsible for following the resident's individualized plan of care as developed by the Interdisciplinary Team. Review of Resident 1's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan initiated on 01/12/2023, showed, Always stay [sic] [in front] of client when giving her a shower. Review of Resident 1's fall…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the residents' representatives (RR) about the residents' positive Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV-a germ that could easily spread and cause lung infections) test and treatments for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 1 & 2), reviewed for change in condition. This failure placed the residents and/or their representatives at risk of not being provided adequate information to make informed decisions about their medical condition. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, DSHS [Department of Social and Health Services]/DDA (Developmental Disabilities Administration) Policy 9.06 Health Services, Department of Health Surveillance and Reporting Guidelines for Disease Outbreaks ., showed that when the Primary Nurse is aware of any clients [residents] .with flu-like symptoms (or other contagious disease), the LN [licensed nurse] will report to the Resource Nurses or HCC [Health Care Coordinator] . The policy further stated that HCC or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-11-07 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the nurse staffing information postings were posted on daily basis at the beginning of each shift. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the nurse staffing information postings were in prominent locations readily accessible to residents and visitors for 5 of 5 units ([NAME], Hickory, Elm, Cherry, and Birch), reviewed for Nurse Staffing Information. These failures placed residents and visitors at risk for not being fully informed of current nurse staffing levels and resident census information. Findings included . [NAME] UNIT Observations on 10/30/2024 at 10:46 AM, on 10/31/2024 at 8:33 AM, on 11/01/2024 at 8:52 AM, on 11/04/2024 at 9:05 AM, and on 11/05/2024 at 11:52 AM, showed the [NAME] Unit's nurse staffing information was not posted in a prominent place readily accessible to residents and visitors. Further observation showed the nurse staffing information form was placed on a clipboard and the clipboard was placed in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 6 of 22 residents (Residents 348, 82, 45, 35, 97, & 12), reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool). The failure to ensure accurate assessments regarding capturing occurrences during the look-back period for anticoagulant (medication that helps to prevent blood clots from forming) use, tracheostomy (an opening into the trachea (windpipe) from outside the neck) care, timing of MDS sections completion, completion of a discharge assessment, placed the residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents) Version 1.19.1, dated October 2024, showed, .an accurate assessment requires collecting information from multiple sources, some of which are mandated by regulations. Those sources must include the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement comprehensive care plans for 5 of 22 residents (Residents 44, 88, 45, 24, & 77), reviewed for care planning. The failure to develop/implement care plans for antidepressant medication use, pressure ulcer (bed sore) care, antibiotic (medication to treat infection) use, refusal of care and use of antipsychotic medication (to treat symptoms of certain mental health disorders) placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled Roles and Responsibilities of Nursing Facility Interdisciplinary Team Members, dated 01/23/2023, indicated that a care plan is an individualized plan based on comprehensive assessment and professional recommendations. Further review of the policy showed that the care plan aims to promote the individual's highest level of functioning, with a focus on improvement where possible, maintenance of skills and abilities, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired medication was disposed of timely and a controlled substance (a drug or chemical that is regulated by the government because it can be addictive or harmful if misused) medication was handled and accounted appropriately for 1 of 3 medication carts ([NAME] Building), reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed the residents at risk for receiving compromised and/or ineffective medications and for potential diversion or misappropriation of controlled substance medication. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Preparation and Administration of Medications and Treatments, revised in 05/2024, showed that for medication in the original manufacturer's container (bottle), staff should check expiration dates of medication on manufacture's label .dispose of expired medications. Review of the facility's policy titled, Controlled Substance Medication Handling and Accountability, revised in 05/2023, showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were handled appropriately in accordance with professional standards of food safety for 2 of 3 refrigerators (Walk-in Produce/Milk Refrigerator and Walk-in Preparation Salad Refrigerator), 1 of 1 dry storage room (Commissary Dry Storage Room), and for 3 of 8 staff (Staff NN, OO & PP), reviewed for food services. The failure to date and discard food items past the use by/discard date, perform hand hygiene and handle kitchen equipment appropriately placed the residents at risk for food borne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages), cross contamination, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Facility Food Storage and Meal Preparation Policy, dated 04/08/2024, showed, Remove all expired food items and Any food that appears spoiled, contaminated, or past its use-by date must be discarded immediately. The policy showed, Note that the use of disposable gloves is not a substitute for proper hand washing. Hands must be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff were fit tested (a test protocol conducted to verify that a respirator provides the wearer with the expected protection) timely for N95 (a device/mask designed to protect the wearer against particles and help prevent the spread of germs) masks and used correctly for 2 of 6 staff (Staff EE & Staff FF), reviewed for infection control. In addition, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene practices and/or proper use of gloves were followed before, during, and after resident care for 5 of 14 staff (Staff Z, L, JJ, Q & R), failed to disinfect medical equipment for 2 of 2 staff (Staff II & U), and failed to ensure that infection control practices were implemented with storage of sharp containers for 3 of 3 medication rooms (Cherry, Birch & Hickory). These failures placed the residents, visitors, and staff at an increased risk for infection and related complications. Findings included . N95 MASK USE Review of the facility's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner that maintained and promoted dignity while assisting with a meal for 1 of 18 residents (Resident 29), reviewed for dining observation. This failure placed the resident at risk for a diminished self-worth and over all wellbeing. Findings included . Review of Resident 29's quarterly minimum data set (an assessment tool) dated 10/03/2024, showed that the resident had moderately impaired cognition. Review of Resident 29's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan, printed on 11/04/2024, directed staff to sit down at Resident 29's eye level when assisting with meals. Observation on 10/31/2024 at 12:04 PM, showed Resident 29 was seated upright in their wheelchair in the dining room with their lunch tray. Resident 29 was observed eating their lunch and dropped food. Further observation showed, Staff O, Attendant Counselor 1 assisted Resident 29 while standing over them. On 10/31/2024 at 12:33 PM, Staff O stated that Resident 29 was halfway through their lunch meal, and they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to inform residents and/or their representatives of risks and benefits before application of a restraint for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 41 & 12), reviewed for physical restraint. This failure placed the residents and/or their representatives at risk for not being fully informed before making decisions regarding their health care, alternative treatment options, and the right to refuse care. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Informed Consent, revised on 10/15/2024, showed that informed consent means agreement to proceed with a particular treatment or service based upon certain components including the name, relationship to the client, and signature of the person giving informed consent signifying that they do or do not grant consent. The Interdisciplinary Team (IDT- a group of health care professionals with various areas of expertise who work together toward the goals of their residents) shall obtain appropriate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure annual Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) was completed within 14 days from the Assessment Reference Date (ARD) for 1 of 22 residents (Resident 24), reviewed for comprehensive assessments. This failure placed the resident at risk for delayed and/or unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents), Version 1.19.1, revised in October 2024, showed that annual assessment is a comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed on an annual basis (at least every 366 days) and should be completed no later than 14 days from the ARD (ARD + [plus] 14 days). Review of the facility's policy titled, Roles and Responsibilities of Nursing Facility Interdisciplinary Team Members, with effective date of 01/23/2023, showed that the Heath Care Coordinator serves as the person designated for finalizing the MDS, ensure it was completed by the due date…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) was completed for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 35), reviewed for SCSA. This failure placed the resident at risk for delayed care planning, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents) Version 1.18.11, dated October 2023, showed that a SCSA is a comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed when determined that a resident meets the significant change guidelines for either major improvement or decline. The RAI manual showed a significant change is a major decline or improvement in a resident's status that impacts more than one area of the resident's health status. The RAI manual further showed emergence of unplanned weight loss problem (5% change in 30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services were consistently provided to increase Range of Motion (ROM) and/or to prevent decrease in ROM for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 12 & 81), reviewed for restorative services. This failure placed the residents at risk for a decline in ROM, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . RESIDENT 12 Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 07/28/2024, showed Resident 12 had limited ROM to their upper and lower extremities on both sides. Review of the comprehensive care plan printed on 11/01/2024, showed an intervention that Resident 12 was on a right-hand soft splint/Therapy Aide program, which showed the application of right soft hand splints 5x[times]/week. Review of the facility's document titled, Therapy Aide Documentation for the month of October 2024, showed Resident 12 was on a therapy program to apply right hand soft splint .5x/week. It further showed the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical supplies used for medication administration were stored properly for 2 of 3 medication rooms (Cherry and Hickory Buildings), reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed the residents at risk for ingestion or exposure to cleaning chemicals and potential negative outcomes. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Globally Harmonized System for Hazard Communication Written Hazard Communication Program, revised on 10/01/2024, showed that The Chemical Hazard Communication compliance program establishes systems to mitigate the risks of and properly handle hazardous chemicals and drugs by ensuring that employees know the hazards and identifies the chemicals and drugs with which they work. CHERRY BUILDING MEDICATION ROOM Joint observation and interview on 11/04/2024 at 11:12 AM with Staff L, Registered Nurse (RN) 2, showed an open box of tongue depressors [popsicle sticks used for mixing medications], an open box of plastic pill cups [shallow cups used to hold medications in a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services related to gastrostomy tube (G-tube - a medical device used to provide nutrients through a tube directly into the stomach) were followed for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 9), reviewed for tube feeding management. The failure to check for G-tube placement by visual inspection of aspirated stomach content prior to medication administration placed the resident at risk for medical complications and negative health outcomes. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Enteral Feeding [method of providing nutrition directly into the stomach when a person is unable to eat by mouth] Administration and Hang Time using Open/Close System via Gravity and Pump, revised in March 2024, showed that when staff accessed the feeding tube, they should check enteral tube for correct placement by aspiration [using a syringe to gently draw back on the G-tube to see if any gastric contents (fluid or air) can be aspirated]. Review of Resident 9's face sheet printed on 11/05/2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing were labeled and/or appropriately stored for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 4 & 80), reviewed for respiratory care. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and potential negative outcomes. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration and Safety Guidelines, revised in September 2023, showed, Change oxygen administration accessories (mask, tubing, humidifier [a device that adds moisture to the air], and concentrator filter) weekly and PRN [as needed]. The tubing's and the humidifier are dated. RESIDENT 4 Review of Resident 4's physician's order, dated 05/28/2024, showed an order for oxygen at two liters (a unit of measurement)/minute (flow rate of oxygen being delivered to a resident through a device like a nasal cannula [lightweight tube that splits into two prongs at one end and is inserted in the nostrils to deliver oxygen]) via nasal cannula with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure clinical records were complete and accurate for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 18), reviewed for resident medical records. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and medical complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Supporting End of Life Decisions in Residential Habilitation Centers, dated 06/15/2018, showed a definition for Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) that meant a portable medical order form that allows a person with a serious illness or frailty to summarize their wishes regarding life-sustaining treatment. It further showed that all direct care staff who work with the client must be shown the POLST and trained to implement it. Review of Resident 18's hard chart showed a POLST form dated 05/14/2024 showed Resident 18's code status (instructions to their medical team about what to do if they have no pulse and was not breathing) was Do Not Attempt Resuscitation (DNAR). Review of Resident 18's Electronic Health Record (EHR)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-11-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the pneumococcal vaccine (used to prevent pneumonia [a lung infection]) was offered for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 80) reviewed for immunizations and infection control. This failure placed residents at risk of acquiring, transmitting, and/or experiencing potentially avoidable complications from pneumococcal and disease. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Immunizations for Clients, reviewed in May 2023, showed that clients will be provided immunizations per the standardized recommendations of the local health department, CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] and Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). Review of the CDC online document for Pneumococcal Vaccine for Adults Aged (greater than or equal to) 19 Years: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), United States, 2023, dated 09/08/2023, showed In 2021, two new pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, . (PCV15 [vaccine…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely reporting of abuse allegation to the State Agency for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse/neglect reporting. This failure placed the resident at risk for potential unidentified and ongoing abuse and lack of protection from abuse. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy subject titled, Client Abuse Reporting Under Washington State Law, dated 01/01/2022 showed, the department must immediately report and process allegations of suspected abuse. Further review of the policy showed employees mandatory reporting responsibilities are not limited to the workplace, and always apply, including off-duty hours. Review of the facility's policy titled, Protection from Abuse: Mandatory Reporting, issued 07/2024, showed Immediately meant there should be no delay between reporter awareness of the incident/allegation and making the report. Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 1's clinical note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure necessary care and services was provided per professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1), and failed to prevent an unnecessary replacement of gastrojejunostomy tube (GJ tube, is a feeding tube that is placed through the stomach into the jejunum [small intestine] and that has dual ports to access both the stomach and the small intestine for administration of food, fluids, and medications) for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 2), reviewed for GJ tube replacement. These failures placed the residents at risk of unmet care needs, unnecessary surgical procedure, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life. Finding included RESIDENT 1 Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], showed Resident 1 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living (ADL). Review of the progress notes dated 09/28/2023 showed that during medication administration, Staff G, Registered Nurse, found that Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-07 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 5 of 29 residents (Residents 49, 51, 48, 54, and 42) reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS- an assessment tool) assessment. The failure to ensure accurate assessments regarding eating, diagnosis for catheter (a flexible tube placed into the bladder to drain urine) use, falls, and dental condition placed the residents at risk for unidentified or unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, Version 1.17.1, dated October 2019, showed the accuracy of an assessment means that the appropriate, qualified health professionals correctly document the resident's medical, functional, and psychosocial problems and identify resident strengths to maintain or improve medical status, functional abilities, and psychosocial status using the appropriate RAI (i.e., comprehensive, Quarterly, Annual, Significant Change in status). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods stored in the kitchen were discarded on or before use by date. In addition, the facility failed to ensure ready-to-eat food was handled appropriately in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 1 of 6 dining rooms. These failures placed the residents at risk for food borne illnesses (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages), cross contamination, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the undated policy titled, Food Storage, showed foods that are past the use by expiration date are to be disposed of unless stored Frozen. Review of the Fircrest Guideline for Keeping or Discarding Food Products, revised in 2021, showed foods prepared at Fircrest, potentially hazardous foods after cooking, leftovers if properly cooled and refrigerated, raw meat after thawing and pies should be discarded after 4 days. Review of the policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans for 1 of 19 residents (Resident 94) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Failure to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 94 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis that included intellectual disabilities. Review of Resident 94's Quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment (an assessment tool), dated 05/27/2023, showed the resident was cognitively impaired and had received an antipsychotic (a type of drug that treats certain types of mental health problems) drug. Review of Resident 94's physician order, dated 07/27/2023, showed the resident had an order for Risperidone (an antipsychotic drug that is used to treat mental illness) 0.25 milligram two times a day for unspecified impulse disorder. A review of the May 2023, June 2023, and July 2023 Medication Administration Records, showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents consistently received the appropriate treatment and services related to tube feeding (TF - a medical device used to provide nutrition through a tube directly to the stomach) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 21) reviewed for tube feeding. Failure to change the TF administration set, formula, and water flush bag placed Resident 21 at risk for adverse consequences and/or complications of feeding via TF. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Enteral [via the gastrointestinal] Feeding Administration and Hang Time using Open/Closed System via Gravity and Pump, last revised May 2023, directed the staff to change the formula and administration set every 24 to 48 hours for enteral formula administration using closed system by pump. The policy showed the administration set, and the top fill water bag should be changed every 24 hours. Resident 21 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain, clean and store respiratory (breathing) equipment properly for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 26) and 1 of 10 suction machines (a medical device used to remove mucus/saliva secretions/blood obstruction from a person's airway) (Elm's Suction Machine 2) reviewed for respiratory care. These failures placed residents at risk for infection and a decrease in health maintenance. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Oropharyngeal [mouth and throat] Suctioning, revised in April 2021, showed the requirement for facility staff was to detach the tonsil (suction) tip from the connecting tubing and place it in a clean towel or wrapper if it was to be reused within 24 hours; otherwise, discard it. The staff were directed to discard the tonsil tip after each use if secretions were thick or infected. <RESIDENT 26> Resident 26 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with risk of aspiration (inhaling food or liquid into the airway…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper hand hygiene practices were followed during stoma (an opening surgically created in the wall of the stomach that allows waste to leave the body) care for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 32) reviewed for tube feeding (a device that delivers liquid nutrition via tube through the stomach). This failure placed the resident at risk for facility acquired or healthcare-associated infections and related complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, revised in December 2020, showed that hand hygiene was to be performed before applying gloves and after removing gloves. Resident 32 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of gastrostomy (surgical procedure for inserting a tube through the abdomen wall into the stomach used for feeding) status. Review of Resident 32's August 2023 Medication Administration Record, showed an order to clean the gastrostomy tube stoma two times a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ownership Data Not Available |
The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
What families pay in WA
CMS lists this home as Medicaid-certified only — it can accept Medicaid for long-term care, but it is not Medicare-certified, so Medicare will not pay for a short rehabilitation (“skilled nursing”) stay here. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 50A260. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-11-07, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.