No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Kin On Health Care Center

4416 South Brandon Street, Seattle, WA 98118 · Non profit - Corporation · 100 certified beds · (206) 721-3630 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0609, F0610) — most recent Apr 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$19,468 in federal fines1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $19,468 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-11)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
5316 Rainier Ave S · (206) 721-5600 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5405 Rainier Ave S · (206) 722-8882 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5205 39th Ave S · (916) 717-2673 · Call to confirm hours
Park
5234 37th Ave S · (206) 684-4075 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 4 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased20.4%14.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight12.2%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.6%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%1.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms2.2%17.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.5%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened18.5%17.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication2.7%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.0%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.0%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.2%22.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table14.4%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine76.2%82.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.9%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit14.0%13.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.351.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.281.521.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 55 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

33.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.05hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 9% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF33.0%CMS range 22.2–42.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.4%CMS range 5.6–15.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified81.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened4.8%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.901.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.37
RN hours/ resident / day
0.46
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.73
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.56
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.06
RN hoursweekends
35.3%
Total nursing turnover
48.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 91.0 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.56 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.37 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.73 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.99 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.79 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.50 to 1.06 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

11
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-05-27)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-26)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide safe water temperatures and ensure adequate supervision and/or assistance to prevent accidents for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 1 & 2), reviewed for accident hazards. Resident 1 experienced serious injury when unsafe hot water temperature was provided to them sustaining second-degree burns (damage to both the outer and inner layers of the skin) requiring treatment. Resident 2 was at risk of harm when they were observed accessing unsafe hot water temperatures in the nurse's lounge. These failures placed the residents at risk of further injuries, related complications, and a diminished quality of life. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified, and the facility was notified of the noncompliance on 05/14/2025. The IJ was determined to have begun on 05/11/2025, when the facility failed to provide Resident 1 with safe water temperatures resulting in second degree burns and failed to provide supervision for ambulatory residents (Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the plan of care to use a gait belt (a safety device used to assist residents with mobility issues) for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1), reviewed for accident hazards. Resident 1 experienced harm when they fractured their left clavicle (a break in the bone that connects the breastbone to the shoulder blade) and experienced pain when staff members transferred the resident without the use of a gait belt. The failure to follow plan of care when assisting with transfers placed residents at risk for avoidable injury, unsafe transfers, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review the facility's policy, titled Use of Gait Belt, revised on 05/30/2024 showed it was the facility's policy to use gait belts with residents that cannot independently ambulate or transfer for the purpose of safety. The policy showed that each employee would be given a gait belt during orientation, receive education on the proper use of gait belts, and that each…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-05-27 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure wheelchairs were cleaned for 13 of 16 residents (Residents 81, 73, 71, 70, 12, 37, 45, 47, 41, 22, 9, 76 & 27), reviewed for comfortable/safe equipment use. This failure placed the residents at risk for unsafe equipment and a diminished quality of life.Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Cleaning and Disinfection of Resident-Care Equipment, reviewed on 02/20/2026, showed, Resident care equipment can be a source of indirect transmission of pathogens. Reusable resident-care equipment will be cleaned and disinfected in accordance with current CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] recommendations in order to break the chain of infection . Direct staff are responsible for cleaning single-resident equipment when visibly soiled, and according to routine schedule (where applicable) . most equipment may be cleaned/disinfected in the areas in which the equipment is used . RESIDENT 81Observations on 05/21/2026 at 12:51 PM and on 05/22/2026 at 12:29 PM, showed Resident 81's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-27 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) assistance were consistently provided for 5 of 9 residents (Residents 12, 15, 35, 37 & 81), reviewed for dining. The failure to provide residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with meals placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, poor nutrition, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), revised on 03/20/2026 showed, Care and services will be provided for the following activities of daily living .eating to include meals . The policy further showed, A resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition . RESIDENT 12Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 05/07/2026 showed Resident 12 had impaired cognition and was dependent with eating. Review of the ADL/self-care deficit care plan printed on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-27 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the sanitizing solution concentration within the manufacturer recommended parts per million (ppm) for 1 of 2 kitchen's sanitizing buckets (Red Bucket for the Three Compartment Sink), reviewed for food services. This failure placed residents at risk for foodborne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages), cross contamination, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Manual Warewashing-3 [three] Compartment Sink, revised on 12/15/2025, showed, To prevent the spread of bacteria [tiny germs] that may cause food borne illness, this facility washes, rinses and sanitizes pots, pans and other utensils using a 3 compartment sink in accordance with current standards for food safety. The policy further showed, Sanitizing solutions shall be tested by a test kit or other device that accurately measures the concentration in MG/L [milligrams per liter [unit of measurement].Review of the facility's policy titled, Dishwasher Temperature,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-27 · tag F0646 — isolated
    Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a new Level I PASARR (or PASRR-an assessment used to identify people [residents] with Serious Mental Illness [SMI], intellectual disabilities, or related conditions) after a significant change in status and failed to notify the PASARR Coordinator for 3 of 6 residents (Residents 10, 47 & 8), reviewed for PASARR. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included. Review of the Level I PASRR form revised in June 2025 showed, In the event the resident experiences a significant change in condition.the NF [Nursing Facility] must complete a new PASRR Level 1 and make referrals to the appropriate entities. RESIDENT 10 Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) look up page showed Resident 10 had a Significant Change Assessment (SCSA) dated 04/02/2026. Review of the Hospice Notification of admission dated 03/26/2026 showed Resident 10 had metastatic (spread to other parts…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 2 of 7 residents (Residents 47 & 10), reviewed for comprehensive care plans. The failure to develop a care plan for diabetes mellitus (a disease where the body cannot properly regulate blood sugar levels), use of insulin (a hormone that helps regulate blood sugar levels) and hospice care (comfort care for individuals with terminal illness or with six months or less life expectancy) placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, revised on 04/24/2026, showed, It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs and ALL services that are identified in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and revise comprehensive care plans for 2 of 6 residents (Residents 61 & 10), reviewed for care planning. The failure to review and revise care plans for nutrition and discontinuation of psychotropic (mind-altering) medications placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, revised on 04/24/2026, showed, The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly MDS [Minimum Data Set-an assessment tool]. RESIDENT 61Review of Resident 61's nutrition care plan, revised on 01/15/2025, showed interventions for dysphagia (difficulty swallowing)-aspiration (something entering the airway or lungs) precautions, which included sit in upright position during eating; feed in small sips/bite; Stop for awhile and report to LN [Licensed Nurse] if cough during eating; use…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 61), reviewed for accident/hazards. The failure to ensure aspiration precautions (safety measures designed to prevent food, liquids, or saliva from entering the airway and lungs) were implemented, placed the resident at risk for accidents, injury, and other negative outcomes.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Accidents and Supervision, revised on 03/20/2026, showed, Each resident will receive adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents, which includes Implementing interventions to reduce hazard(s) and risk(s).Review of Resident 61's quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool), dated 04/16/2026, showed that Resident 61 had a diagnosis of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).Review of Resident 61's nutrition care plan, revised on 01/15/2025, showed interventions for dysphagia aspiration (something entering the airway or lungs) precautions, which included sit in upright position during eating; feed in small…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications had a record of receipt with sufficient detail to allow for reconciliation and/or have disposal methods that involved a secure and safe method for 1 of 3 medication carts (Station 1 Medication Cart 3), reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed the facility at risk for potential loss/misappropriation, drug diversion, and negative outcomes.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Controlled Substance Administration & Accountability, revised on 02/26/2026, showed Two licensed staff must witness any disposal or destruction of a controlled substance and document on the Drug Disposition Record, Controlled Drug Record, or via the automated dispensing system.Review of a narcotic book page showed an area to be filled out when a controlled medication was transferred, the quantity remaining at the time of transfer, the book, page, staff initials, and date the transfer occurred. The page showed another area for Disposition [removal or transfer] of Unused Medication, and an area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-27 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adverse side effects of an antidepressant (medication to treat depression [persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest]) were monitored for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 63), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk for negative outcomes, related complications, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, High Risk Medications, revised on 04/09/2026, showed, .high risk medications can include.psychotropics [mind-altering medications].that can bear a heightened risk. The policy further showed, The resident's plan of care shall alert staff to monitor for adverse consequences of any high-risk medications given.Residents and/or representatives will be educated on the use and risks/benefits of high-risk medications, including adverse effects. Review of the facility's policy titled, Use of Psychotropic Medication(s), revised on 04/21/2026, showed, Psychotropic medications are to be used only.to treat a resident's specific, diagnosed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were secured for 1 of 4 medication carts (Station 2 Medication Cart 1), reviewed for medication administration. This failure placed residents at risk for unintended access to medications and biologicals, and negative outcomes.Findings included.Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Storage, revised on 02/26/2026, showed, All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments (i.e., medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, medication rooms) under proper temperature controls. The policy showed, Only authorized personnel will have access to the keys to locked compartments. The policy further showed, During medication pass, medications must be under the direct observation of the person administering medications or locked in the medication storage area/cart.Observation on 05/21/2026 at 8:27 AM showed Staff I, Registered Nurse, opened Station 2 Medication Cart 1 without a key. An additional observation at 8:43 AM showed Staff I opened Station 2 Medication Cart 1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 41 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Transmission Based Precautions (TBP- measures put in place to prevent spread of infection by staff wearing Personal Protective Equipment [PPE-use of gown, gloves, mask and/or face shield/goggles] before entering a resident's room or environment) practices were followed for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 99), and failed to follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP- protocols to protect residents from multidrug-resistant organisms [a germ that is resistant to medications that treat infections]) practices were followed by 1 of 3 staff (Staff T), reviewed for infection control. These failures placed the residents, visitors, and staff at an increased risk for infection, related complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Transmission-Based (Isolation) Precautions, revised on 02/20/2026, showed, The facility will use standard approaches, as defined by the CDC [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention], for transmission-based precautions: airborne…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-04 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure injuries of unknown source and abuse allegations were thoroughly investigated for 4 of 5 residents (Residents 1, 2, 3 & 4), reviewed for abuse investigations. This failure placed the residents at risk for repeated incidents, unidentified abuse, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, Sixth Edition, dated October 2015, showed that injuries of unknown source meant any injury sustained by a resident where the source of the injury was Not observed directly by a staff person . The resident is not able to report/inform how the injury occurred .Injuries of unknown source may be either superficial or substantial in nature. It showed, Substantial injuries require more than first aid and may require close assessment and monitoring by nursing or medical staff. They also include injuries occurring in areas not generally vulnerable to trauma .Substantial injuries of unknown source, even if they do not appear to be due to abuse or neglect, must be reported to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-04 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician reviewed the total program of care including treatment and medications and completed progress notes timely for 38 of 38 residents (Residents 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 & 42), reviewed for physician progress notes. This failure had the potential to place the residents at risk for a delay in treatment, unmet medical care needs, and lack of physician oversight. Findings included . Review of the complaint hotline form dated 03/05/2025, showed the facility submitted to the state agency that there are concerns in regard to the Medical Director [Staff D] and his medical duties. Review of the incident investigation dated 03/04/2025, showed that Staff D saw around 40 residents [Residents 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41 & 42] here at the facility and was also the Medical Director.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report significant injury of unknown origin for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 3) reviewed for abuse investigations. The facility's failure to report large bruises of unknown origin on the resident's chest and torso, placed the residents at risk for repeated incidents and unidentified abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . Review of the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, dated October 2015 (sixth edition) showed, The facility must ensure that all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, or abuse, including injuries of unknown source .are reported to the administrator of the facility and to other officials in accordance with State law through established procedures (including to the State survey and certification agency). It showed that Injuries of unknown source means any injury sustained by a resident where the source of the injury was .not observed by a staff person .the resident is not able to report/inform how the injury occurred. It further showed that substantial injuries (including bruises occurring…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to provide care and services in a manner that maintained and promoted dignity before entering resident rooms for 4 of 11 rooms (Rooms 121, 122, 126 & 119), reviewed for dignity. This failure placed the residents at risk for a diminished self-worth and over-all well-being. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, revised on 10/17/2024, showed the resident has a right to be treated with respect and dignity. room [ROOM NUMBER] Multiple observations on 02/20/2025 at 8:55 AM, at 9:01 AM, at 9:11 AM, and at 9:20 AM, showed Staff R, Licensed Practical Nurse, entered room [ROOM NUMBER] without knocking or identifying themselves to the residents prior to entering. room [ROOM NUMBER] Multiple observations on 02/20/2025 at 8:56 AM, at 12:22 PM, and at 12:46 PM, showed Staff R entered room [ROOM NUMBER] without knocking or identifying themselves to the residents prior to entering. room [ROOM NUMBER] Observations…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the survey result binder included the recertification and complaint survey results that resulted in citations for 2 of 3 years (2022 & 2024), reviewed for availability of survey reports. In addition, the facility failed to post notice of the availability of survey reports in areas of the facility that are prominent and accessible to the public. These failures prevented residents, residents' representatives and visitors from exercising their right to review past survey results and the facility's plan of corrections. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Availability of Survey Results, revised on 02/25/2025, showed, The facility will maintain reports of any surveys, certifications, and complaint investigations made respecting the facility during the 3 preceding years, and any plan of correction in effect with respect to the facility. This information will be available for any individual to review upon request. The policy further showed, Signs identifying the availability and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement care plans for 7 of 8 residents (Residents 43, 78, 1, 9, 80, 3 & 85), reviewed for care planning. The failure to develop person-centered care plans for use of bed rails placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, revised on 02/17/2025, showed, It is the policy of this facility to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident .that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing .and all services that are identified in the resident's comprehensive assessment and meet professional standards of quality. The policy further showed that comprehensive care plan will be developed within seven days after the completion of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) assessment. Review of the facility's policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to revise comprehensive care plans for 4 of 18 residents (Residents 76, 1, 492 & 58), reviewed for care plan revision. The failure to revise care plans for residents with diagnosis of dementia (loss of memory, language, problem-solving and other thinking abilities that are severe enough to interfere with daily life), missing/broken denture and discharge planning placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, revised on 02/17/2025, showed, The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team [IDT-therapy, nursing, social services] after each comprehensive and quarterly MDS [Minimum Data Set- an assessment tool] assessment. Review of the facility's policy titled, Discharge Planning Process, revised on 02/17/2025, showed that subsequent assessment information and discharge goals would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to comprehensively assess residents for the use of bed rails for 7 of 8 residents (Residents 1, 9, 80, 3, 43, 78 & 85) reviewed for bed rails. This failure placed residents at risk for potential injury, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Proper Use of Bed Rails, revised on 02/24/2025, showed, It is the policy of this facility to utilize a person-centered approach when determining the use of bed rails .Examples of bed rails include, but are not limited to side rails, bed side rails, safety rails, grab bars and assist bars [enabler] .The resident assessment must include an evaluation of the alternatives that were attempted prior to the installation or use of a bed rail and how these alternativeness failed to meet the resident's assessed needs .The resident assessment must also assess the resident's risk from using bed rails . the medical record should include evidence…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-26 · tag F0732 — pattern
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the daily nurse staffing form was accurately completed with actual hours worked after the start of each shift for 5 of 7 days (02/19/2025, 02/20/25, 02/21/2025, 02/24/2025 & 02/26/2025), reviewed for sufficient and competent staffing. This failure placed the residents and residents' representatives at risk of not being fully informed of the current staffing levels. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Nurse Staffing Posting Information, revised on 02/25/2025, showed that the nurse staffing form will be posted daily and will include the total number and the actual hours worked by licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. It further showed that, The information shall reflect staff absences on that shift due to call-outs and illness. After the start of each shift, actual hours will be updated to reflect such. An observation on 02/18/2025 at 10:01 AM, showed posted signage at Nursing Station 2 that listed nursing staff shift hours as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy services were provided per professional standards of practice for 4 of 9 residents (Residents 39, 14, 49 & 6), reviewed for medication management. The failure to clarify physician's order, document medication, and properly identify residents prior to medication administration placed the residents at risk for medication errors, negative outcomes, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration, revised on 02/24/2025, showed that Medications are administered .as ordered by the physician and in accordance with professional standards of practice .identify resident by photo in the MAR (medication administration record). The policy further showed to ensure that the six rights of medication administration were followed: right resident, right drug, right dosage, right route, right time, right documentation and to sign the MAR after administration of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure refrigerator temperatures were monitored for safe storage of vaccines (biological preparation that provides immunity to a particular disease) were followed for 1 of 1 medication room refrigerator (Station 2 Medication Room Refrigerator), and failed to ensure expired medical supplies and/or biologicals (diverse group of medicines made from natural sources) were removed or discarded in accordance with current accepted professional standards for 1 of 1 clean utility room (Station 2 Clean Utility Room), reviewed for medication storage and labeling. These failures placed the residents at risk for receiving compromised and ineffective medications and medical supplies. Findings included . According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website titled, Vaccine Storage and Handling, dated [DATE], showed, To ensure the safety of vaccines, the storage unit minimum and maximum temperatures should be checked and recorded at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the sanitizing solution/agent was at the correct concentration used to ensure proper sanitation of food preparation surfaces in accordance with professional standards for 1 of 1 kitchen, reviewed for food safety. This failure placed the residents at risk for food borne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages) and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Food Safety Requirements, revised on 01/24/2025, showed that all equipment used in the handling of food shall be cleaned and sanitized, and handle in a manner to prevent contamination. The policy further showed, staff shall follow facility procedures for dishwashing and cleaning fixed cooking equipment. The facility procedure showed that staff clean/wipe with detergent solution, rinsed with hot water, wipe with sanitizing solution, and air dry. Review of the undated online document titled, Washington State Food Worker Manual, showed, Sanitizer solution stops working overtime.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report a communicable disease (infectious disease that can spread through direct or indirect contact) outbreak (two or more cases of a highly contagious disease) for 1 of 1 outbreak, and failed to ensure proper infection control practices were followed during resident care and medication administration for 2 of 12 residents (Resident 65 & 6), reviewed for infection control. In addition, the facility failed to ensure Transmission Based Precautions (TBP- additional infection control measures used when standard precautions are not enough to prevent the spread of an infection) practices were followed for 2 of 7 residents (Residents 11 & 57). These failures placed the residents, staff, and visitors at an increased risk of infection and related complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Communicable Disease (Infection Control Reporting) Policy, revised on 02/25/2025, showed it was the facility policy to timely report possible incidents of communicable disease or infections to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to initiate and resolve a grievance for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for grievances. The failure to initiate, investigate, and resolve grievances for missing personal item placed the resident at risk for feelings of frustration, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident and Family Grievances, revised on 07/08/2024, showed, The Grievance Official is responsible for overseeing the grievance process; receiving and tracking grievances through to their conclusion; leading any necessary investigations by the facility; maintaining the confidentiality of all information associated with grievances; issuing written grievance decisions to the resident; and coordinating with state and federal agencies as necessary in light of specific allegations .The Grievance Official will take steps to resolve the grievance, and record information about the grievance, and those actions, on the grievance form. Review of the Quarterly Minimum Data Set (an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure injuries of unknown source and falls were thoroughly investigated for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 81 & 65), reviewed for abuse investigations. This failure placed the residents at risk for repeated incidents, unidentified abuse, and inappropriate corrective actions. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Incidents and Accidents, revised on 02/25/2025, showed, It is the policy of this facility for staff to utilize Point Click Care (Risk Management System) to report, investigate, and review any accidents or incidents that occur or allegedly occur, on facility property and may involve or allegedly involve a resident. The policy showed the purpose of incident reporting included assuring that appropriate and immediate interventions were implemented, corrective actions were taken to prevent recurrences, improve the management of resident care, conducting root cause analysis, and meeting regulatory requirements for analysis and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 2 of 18 residents (Residents 1 & 57), reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool). The failure to ensure accurate assessments of the MDS Section L (Oral/Dental Status) and Section N (Medications) placed the residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. According to the Long-Term Care Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual, (a guide directing staff on how to accurately assess the status of residents) Version 1.19.1, dated October 2024, showed, .an accurate assessment requires collecting information from multiple sources, some of which are mandated by regulations. Those sources must include the resident and direct care staff on all shifts, and should also include the resident's medical record, physician, and family, guardian and/or other legally authorized representative, or significant other as appropriate or acceptable. It is important to note here…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR- an assessment used to identify people referred to nursing facilities with Serious Mental Illness (SMI), intellectual disabilities (ID); or related conditions are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) form was accurate and sent out for a Level II PASARR referral for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 58), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk for not receiving the care and services appropriate for their needs. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Assessment - Coordination with PASARR Program, revised on 02/21/2025, showed the Social Services Director (SSD) or designee was responsible for keeping track of each resident's PASARR screening status, and referring to the appropriate authority. Resident 58 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 58's face sheet printed on 02/26/2025 showed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate staff supervision and/or assistance was provided during meals for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 65) and failed to ensure bed rails/enablers were secured for 1 of 5 residents (Residents 3), reviewed for accident hazards. These failures placed the residents at risk for choking episodes, aspiration (when food or liquid enters the airways or lungs), accidents, injury, and other negative outcomes. Findings included . RESIDENT 65 Review of Resident 65's nutrition care plan, initiated on 11/23/2023, showed an intervention for one to one [1 on 1] supervision assist for aspiration precautions. Review of Resident 65's February 2025 physician order summary report, printed on 02/24/2025, showed a physician order for regular diet with 1 to 1 supervision assist. Further review showed another physician order for aspiration precaution: strict 1 to 1 feeding assist, check for pocketing. Sit fully upright for all PO [by mouth]. Remain fully…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure monthly pharmacy recommendations were followed up on for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 76), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk for receiving unnecessary medications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Regimen Review, revised on 02/24/2025, showed, Facility Staff shall act upon all recommendations according to procedures for addressing medication Regimen Review irregularities. Review of Resident 76's admission record printed on 02/25/2025 showed that they readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the facility provided Pharmacy Drug Medication Review binder showed a document titled, Current Resident listing for [facility's name] with Medication Regimen Review activity between 01/01/2025 and 01/13/2025 had Resident 76 listed on the document. Further review showed no documentation of a pharmacy recommendation for Resident 76. In an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure allegations of financial exploitation was thoroughly investigated for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1), reviewed for abuse investigations. This failure placed the resident at risk for repeated incidents, unidentified financial exploitation, and inappropriate corrective actions. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, date implemented on 09/07/2023 showed, An immediate investigation is warranted when suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, or reports of abuse, neglect or exploitation occur. Review of the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, revised in 2015, showed that all alleged incidents of abuse, neglect, abandonment, mistreatment, injuries of unknown source, personal and/or financial exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property must be thoroughly investigated. Review of the significant change in status Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 11/26/2024 showed Resident 1 had intact cognition. In an interview on 12/12/2024 at 11:23 AM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services consistent with professional standards of practice related to managing signs and symptoms and/or treatment of urinary tract infection (UTI-bladder infection) for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 2), reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed the resident at risk of unmet care needs, medical complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship Program, implemented on 05/23/2023, showed, The facility uses the (CDC's [Centers for Disease Control and Prevention] NHSN [National Healthcare Safety Network] Surveillance Definitions, updated McGeer criteria, or other surveillance tool) to define infections. Review of the facility's undated document titled, Revised McGeer Criteria [used for retrospectively counting true infections] for Infection Surveillance Checklist, showed that a new or marked increase in urine frequency and a laboratory result of an organism equal or more than100,000 colony forming units (cfu-a unit that is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure possible allegations of abuse were investigated for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 1, 2, 3 & 4), reviewed for abuse investigations. This failure placed the residents at risk for unidentified abuse, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, dated 09/07/2023, showed physical marks such as bruises or physical injury of a resident of unknown source were possible indicators of abuse. The policy also showed that an immediate investigation would be warranted when suspicion of abuse occurred. The policy further showed an investigation would be completed and have thorough documentation. RESIDENT 1 Record review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), dated 07/18/2024, showed Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] AND had moderately impaired cognition. Review of Resident 1's nursing progress note dated 07/25/2024 showed that a nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet professional standards of practice to ensure 5 of 6 licensed staff (Staff O, DD, EE, FF & N) observed for medication administration follow medication administration practices regarding crushing medications, Insulin (a medication to manage blood sugar) administration, Lidocaine patch (pain medication) application, clarifying physician orders and signing off medications. These failures placed the residents at risk for possible medication errors, potential negative outcomes, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Insulin Pen [individual pre-filled device to deliver Insulin], revised on 01/02/2024, showed Insulin pens will be primed [removing air bubbles from the needle] prior to each use to avoid collection of air in the Insulin reservoir. Review of the facility's policy titled, Medication Administration, revised on 01/02/2024, showed a policy to compare medication source [bubble pack, vial, etc.] with MAR [Medication Administration Record] to verify…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-03 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5 Percent (%). The failure to properly administer 4 of 26 medications for 4 of 8 residents (Residents 34, 52, 59 & 69), observed during medication pass resulted in a medication error rate of 15.38%. This failure placed the residents at risk for not receiving the correct dose or receiving less than the intended therapeutic effects of physician ordered medication. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy tilted, Medication Administration, revised on 01/02/2024, showed a policy to compare medication source (bubble pack, vial, etc.) with MAR [Medication Administration Record] to verify resident name, form, dose, route, and time. Additionally, the policy provided example of medications that should not be crushed, which included slow-release (also known as extended release [ER]) medications. RESIDENT 34 Observation on 12/29/2023 at 8:28 AM, showed Staff O, Registered Nurse (RN), was crushing Metoprolol ER (medication to treat high blood pressure) to give to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure expired laboratory/medical supplies were discarded for 1 of 2 medication storage room (Station 2 Medication Room), reviewed for medication storage and labeling. This failure placed the residents at risk for receiving compromised medical supplies, possible infections, and adverse consequences. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage, revised on 01/03/2024, showed the pharmacy and all medication rooms are routinely inspected by the consultant pharmacist for discontinued, outdated, defective, or deteriorated medications with worn, illegible or missing labels. Joint observation and interview on 12/29/2023 at 8:07 AM with Staff L, Registered Nurse, showed the Station 2 Medication Room had the following expired laboratory and medical supplies: - One BD Vacutainer Trace Element Serum (a brand of blood collection tube) with an expiration date of 12/31/2018. - One BD Vacutainer Trace Element Serum with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were handled appropriately in accordance with professional standards of food safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, 1 of 1 dining room, and 1 of 2 station units (Station 1 Unit), reviewed for food services. The failure to label and date food items and perform hand hygiene prior/after serving food placed the residents at risk for food borne illness (caused by the ingestion of contaminated food or beverages), cross contamination, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Food safety Requirements, revised on 01/02/2024, showed that practices to maintain safe refrigerated storage included labeling, dating, and monitoring refrigerated food, including, but not limited to leftovers, so it is used by its use-by date, or frozen (where applicable)/discarded. It also showed that foods and beverages shall be distributed and served to residents in a manner to prevent contamination and maintain food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene practices and proper glove use were followed during glove changes for 1 of 2 staff (Staff V), failed to clean and disinfect resident-care equipment after use for 1 of 1 resident room (room [ROOM NUMBER]), and failed to ensure clean linens were transported properly. These failures placed the residents at risk for facility acquired or healthcare-associated infections, and related complications. Findings included . HAND HYGEINE Review of the facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, implemented on 05/23/2023, showed that hand hygiene shall be performed in accordance with the facility's established hand hygiene procedures. Review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene reviewed/revised on 12/29/2023, directed staff to perform hand hygiene prior to donning (put on) gloves, and immediately after removing gloves. The policy also directed staff to rub hands together, when using alcohol hand…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-03 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident and/or their designated representative were notified before administering a psychotropic (mind altering) medication for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 95), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident and/or their representative at risk of not being fully informed of the risks and benefits before making decisions about their medication. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Use of Psychotropic Medication, reviewed on 01/02/2024, showed that Residents and/or representatives shall be educated on the risks and benefits of psychotropic drug use. Resident 95 readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 95's December 2023 Medication Administration Record showed that Olanzapine (an antipsychotic, a type of psychotropic medication used to treat certain mental/mood disorders) was prescribed and given to Resident 95 starting on 12/23/2023. Review of Resident 95's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure advance directives (healthcare directives) were offered to residents and/or their representatives for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 5, 6 & 1), reviewed for advance directives. This failure placed the residents and/or their representatives at risk for losing their right to have their preferences and choices honored regarding emergent and end-of-life care situations. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Residents' Rights Regarding Treatment and Advance Directives, revised in [DATE], showed that on admission, the facility will determine if the resident has executed an advance directive, and if not, determine whether the resident would like to formulate an advance directive. The facility will provide the resident or resident representative information, in a manner that is easy to understand, about the right to refuse medical or surgical treatment and formulate an advance directive. Upon admission, should the resident have an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-03 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written transfer/discharge notice to the residents/representatives and to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (an advocacy group for residents in a nursing home) describing the reason for transfers for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 27, 72 & 95), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk for not having an opportunity to make informed decision about transfers/discharge and access to an advocate who informed residents about options and residents rights. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer and Discharge [including discharge Against Medical Advice], revised on 12/29/2023, showed that the transfer/discharge notice will be provided to the resident and resident's representative in a language and manner they can understand. The policy also showed that the notice must be provided to the resident, resident's representative if appropriate, and the Long-Term Care Ombudsman as soon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-03 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written summary of the baseline care plan to the residents and/or their representatives for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 248, 249 & 198), reviewed for baseline care plan. This failure resulted in the residents not being informed of their initial plan for delivery of care services and placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Baseline Care Plan, revised on 12/29/2023, showed a written summary of the baseline care plan shall be provided to the resident and/or their representative in a language that the resident and/or resident representative can understand. Staff responsible to provide the written summary shall obtain a signature from the resident and representative to verify that the summary was provided, and a copy shall be saved for medical records. RESIDENT 248 Resident 248 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 248's clinical record, showed no documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for 1 of 23 residents (Resident 32), reviewed for care planning. The failure to identify the resident's preferred spoken language placed the resident at risk for communication difficulty, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, revised on 12/29/2023, showed the comprehensive care plan will describe at a minimum Resident specific interventions that reflect the resident's needs and preferences and align with the resident's cultural identity, as indicated. If the resident is non-English speaking, the facility will identify how communication will occur with the resident. The care plan will identify the language spoken and tools used to communicate. Resident 32 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Date Set (an assessment tool) dated 10/31/2023, showed Resident 32's preferred language was Cantonese…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care plan interventions were revised for 2 of 2 residents (Residents 23 & 36), reviewed for care planning. This failure placed the residents at risk for skin breakdown, unmet care needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Comprehensive Care Plans, revised on 12/29/2023 showed, The comprehensive care plan will be reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each comprehensive and quarterly MDS [Minimum Data Set] assessment. RESIDENT 23 Resident 23 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included vascular dementia (problems with thought processes caused by brain damage from impaired blood flow). Review of the significant change in status MDS dated [DATE] showed Resident 23 was dependent with eating. Review of the activities of daily living eating care task from 12/04/2023 to 01/02/2024, showed staff provided Resident 23 with total dependence-full…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide turning and repositioning per plan of care for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 10), reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL). This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs, skin impairment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Activities of Daily Living, revised on 01/02/2024, showed that a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living will receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral hygiene. Resident 10 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 11/29/2023, showed Resident 10 had severely impaired cognition, functional limitation to both upper extremities (arms/hands), and required total assistance with rolling from back to left and right side on the bed. Further review of the quarterly MDS showed Resident 10 was on a turning…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 25), reviewed for accidents. The failure to provide necessary supervision placed the resident at risk for accidents, injury, and other negative outcomes. Findings included . Resident 25 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) dated 09/11/2023 showed Resident 25 required extensive assistance with toileting. Review of the susceptibility to hazard care plan intervention revised on 10/14/2022, showed when resident uses toilet/commode don't leave resident alone. Additionally, the fall risk care plan revised on 12/22/2022, showed nursing staff will .check for safety and not leave resident unattended in her room or when using the toilet. Observation on 12/26/2023 at 1:02 PM, showed Resident 25 was self-propelling their wheelchair into the bathroom located in the tub/shower room on Station 1. A sign on the door to the tub/shower…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-03 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with urinary catheters (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) received appropriate care and services for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 82 & 73), reviewed for urinary catheter. The failure to ensure urinary catheter was off the floor placed the residents at risk for infections and related complications. Findings included . RESIDENT 82 Resident 82 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included urine retention (difficulty urinating and completely emptying the bladder). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 11/28/2023 showed Resident 82 had an indwelling foley/urinary catheter. Review of the Urinary Elimination Care Plan intervention, revised on 06/19/2023, showed to secure the urinary catheter to facilitate urine flow and to always keep the bag off the floor. Observation on 12/26/2023 at 11:19 AM, showed Resident 82's catheter bag was hooked on the metal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-03 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain, label, and properly store nebulizer machine (breathing treatment) tubing, oxygen and/or suction machine (a medical device used to remove mucus/saliva secretions/blood obstruction from a person's airway) cannula/tubing for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 65, 85 & 10), reviewed for respiratory care. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, respiratory infections, and related complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, revised 01/02/2024, showed to change oxygen tubing and mask/cannula (nasal cannula -a device used to deliver supplemental oxygen) weekly and as needed if it becomes soiled or contaminated and to keep delivery devices covered in a plastic bag when not in use. Review of the facility's policy titled, Nebulizer Therapy, revised on 01/02/2024, showed staff was to Disassemble parts after each treatment. Rinse the nebulizer cup and mouthpiece with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-03 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed nurses had the appropriate competencies, skills set and proficiencies to administer medications for 3 of 5 nursing staff (Staff N, Staff O & Staff P), reviewed for competent nurse staffing. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, potential medication errors, and adverse medication outcomes. Findings included . Review of facility's policy titled, Facility Assessment, dated February 2023, showed that based on the assessment of resident characteristics, the facility will determine what care/services and staff competencies are required to meet the needs of the residents. STAFF N Staff N, Registered Nurse (RN), was hired on 09/22/2023. Review of the undated employee record showed the facility did not complete the medication administration competency skills assessment for Staff N. Observation and interview on 12/29/2023 at 12:52 PM, showed Staff N, RN, prepared to give Resident 69's Geri Care Artificial Tears with ingredients: Glycerin 0.2%, Hypromellose 0.2% (chemical make-up…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring was in place for psychotropic (mind altering) medication management for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 23), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs, adverse side effects, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Use of Psychotropic Medication, revised on 01/02/2024, showed that the effects of the psychotropic medications on a resident's physical, mental and psychological well-being will be evaluated on an ongoing basis, such as upon physician evaluation, during the pharmacist's monthly medication regimen review, during Minimum Data Set (an assessment tool) review, and in accordance with nurse assessments, and medication monitoring parameters consistent with clinical standards of practice. Resident 23 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the January 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed an order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-03 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided education about COVID-19 (a highly transmissible infectious virus that causes respiratory illness and in severe cases can cause difficulty breathing and could result in impairment or death) vaccinations for 3 of 5 residents (Resident 5, 83 and 94), reviewed for COVID-19 immunizations. The failure to educate residents regarding the risks, benefits, and the potential side effects of COVID-19 vaccinations placed the residents at risk for having insufficient information to make informed decisions. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, COVID-19 Vaccination implemented on 05/23/2023, showed that prior to offering the COVID-19 vaccine, residents, or the residents' representative will be educated regarding the risks, benefits and potential side effects associated with the vaccine in a form and manner that can be accessed and understood. RESIDENT 5 Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$19,468 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • $11,190 — penalty dated 2025-08-11
  • $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-05-20
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-17 for 38 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
CHEUNG, CLARAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2016
CHOU, CHRISTINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2013
DONG, GARRETIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2012
ENG, DENNISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
KONG, KONNIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
KWAN, NELLAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
LEE, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2011
LEE, ELSAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
LEE, KING YIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
LEONG, STELLAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2007
LEUNG, ROSAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2013
SU, DENNISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2020
SUN, CLEMENTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
SUN, LO YUIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/1990
SUN, SARAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
TSAO, SHERWINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2016
WANG, JIAKUNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
WING, MARCELLAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2014
WONG, HANNAHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2011
WONG, JANETIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
WONG, RENAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2025
YEE, WARREN DINIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2015
ZHU, WENDYIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2018
HSIEH, TSE-TSINIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2022
KIN ON HEALTH CARE CENTEROrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/18/1995
LEMANUA, LEMAPUIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/30/2025
SADANG, JUDELYNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/20/2025
SYMONS, CHERILYNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/09/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 34 rows in the source record cover these 28 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$14.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+4.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 85%Medicare 4%Other / private 11%

About 85% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$415per resident / day
operating cost
$12,611per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$435per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505453. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-05-27, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next