No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Washington Care Center

2821 South Walden Street, Seattle, WA 98144 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 165 certified beds · (206) 725-2800 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (206) 725-2800 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2024Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 actual-harm citations$52,007 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2024
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $52,007 in federal fines (most recent 2025-09-18)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
3820 Rainier Ave S Ste L · (206) 731-7500 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
3639 Martin Luther King Jr Way S Ste P1 · (206) 695-1976 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3219 Martin Luther King Jr Way S · (206) 687-7641 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Cheasty Blvd S &, S Della St · (206) 684-4075 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.3%14.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.1%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.2%1.0%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%1.6%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.6%17.7%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury5.1%2.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.7%17.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.1%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine86.3%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.5%4.3%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.5%22.5%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.4%15.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.6%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.8%82.0%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission19.6%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.3%13.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.101.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.791.521.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

32.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 115 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

32.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
62.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.13U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.06hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 62.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.13 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 10% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF32.0%CMS range 24.0–41.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.5%CMS range 6.3–12.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge62.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge48.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge51.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified90.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.2%CMS range 4.2–12.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.981.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.84
RN hours/ resident / day
0.76
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.06
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.67
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.83
RN hoursweekends
41.1%
Total nursing turnover
39.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 165 beds and averages 131.8 residents a day — about 80% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.67 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.84 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.24 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.84 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

12
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-12-16)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-21)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

59 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received assessed level of supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed. Resident 1 experienced harm when they fell out of a mechanical lift without the assessed two caregiver assistance, landed on the floor, and sustained a traumatic brain injury (TBI), with multiple areas of bleeding in the brain, upper neck fracture and facial fractures. This failure placed other resident at risk that required assistance of two care givers and a mechanical lift for their Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 02/06/2025, Resident 1 required total assistance from staff with all ADLs including Hoyer (mechanical lift) transfers.The Quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], showed Resident 1 was able to make their needs known, could communicate with staff, and had significant cognitive impairment.The Kardex Policy, dated 12/2003,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident received assessed level of supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed. Resident 1 experienced harm when they rolled off the bed when they were repositioned without the assessed two caregiver assistance, landed on the floor, and sustained three fractures to their hip, knee, and back, and required an increase in pain medications. This failure placed other resident at risk that required assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). The facility's Abuse Prohibition and Prevention policy updated November 2016, showed the facility complied with Federal and State Requirements by training, protecting, and preventing abuse and neglect.According to the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 05/09/2025, the assessment showed Resident 1 required substantial/maximal assistance with bathing and bed mobility. Diagnosis included Paraplegia (paralysis of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2024-05-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from sexual abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for sexual assault. This failed practice resulted in psychological harm, applying the reasonable person approach, for Resident 1 who experienced an attempted sexual act by another resident (Resident 2) and resulted in Resident 1 being transferred to a hospital emergency room (ER) for evaluation. This failed practice placed all residents at risk for the potential of sexual abuse, psychological harm, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Abuse and Neglect- Clinical Protocol, revised 03/2018, showed sexual abuse was defined as a nonconsensual sexual contact of any type with a resident. The policy showed the nurse would assess the resident and document related findings, such as; injury and pain assessment, and report findings to the physician. The physician would evaluate or refer the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-16 · tag F0628 — pattern
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete the appropriate transfer notifications for 7 of 7 residents (Residents 1, 5, 11, 8, 23, 4, & 105) reviewed for hospitalization. The failure to offer bed holds (Residents 1, 5, 11, 8, 23, & 4), provide a written transfer notice (Residents 1, 5, 11, 8, 23, 4, & 105), and notify the State Long Term Care Ombudsman (LTCO) timely of resident discharges (Residents 1, 8 & 23) placed residents at risk for a disruption in their continuity of care, an undesired room change upon readmission, and not having the opportunity to make informed decisions about their transfer/discharge rights, and inappropriate transfers.Findings included .<Policy>According to a facility policy titled Bed Hold, dated 05/2025, the facility would inform the resident or the resident's representative of a bed hold within 24 hours of being transferred.According to a facility policy titled Transfer and Discharge, dated 05/2025, the facility would provide the resident or resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-12-16 · tag F0847 — pattern
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives were informed of the nature and implications of entering into a binding Arbitration (a procedure used to settle a dispute using an independent person mutually agreed upon by both parties) Agreement (AA) for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 1, 33, & 101) reviewed for arbitration. The facility failed to ensure the arbitration agreement was signed and accepted by the residents and/or their Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA) for financial affairs as required. These failures placed residents at risk of lacking understanding of the legal document signed, forfeiture (loss or giving up of something) of their right to a jury or court trial, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 1>According to the 11/23/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 1 had intact memory, and was able to make decisions.Review of Resident 1's AA showed the contract was signed by the resident on 05/22/2025 but Resident 1 did not check the column indicating if they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide care and services in a manner that maintained residents rights for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 23 and 25) and 1 supplementary resident (Resident 7) reviewed for consents and unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk of diminished self-worth and overall well-being.Findings included.<Policy>According to the September 2017 Residents Rights policy, residents are informed about their federal and state rights upon admission and annually during their stay, including the resident's right to refuse any particular service so long as such refusal is documented in the resident's medical record.<Resident 23> According to 10/03/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS -an assessment tool) Resident 23 had severe memory impairment. The MDS showed Resident 23 had a diagnosis of dementia. Review of Resident 23's health records showed a 03/15/2019 advance directive with a healthcare Power of Attorney (POA) appointed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-12-16 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents and/or their representatives received written information of their right to accept or refuse treatment by formulating an Advance Directive (AD) for 2 (Resident 23 and 105) of 6 sampled residents. This failure placed residents at risk of being denied their right to make health care decisions and preventing them from exercising their right to refuse care.Findings included.<Policy>According to the August 2010 AD policy, residents would be informed of their right to make healthcare decisions including the right to refuse treatments and to prepare an AD. Staff were to obtain written acknowledgements of the receipt of such information in residents' medical record.<Resident 23> According to the 05/01/2025 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS – an assessment tool) Resident 23 had severe memory impairment. The MDS showed Resident 23 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review showed 03/15/2019 AD paperwork with a designated Power of Attorney…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure walls, heaters and baseboard in resident rooms were maintained in a safe, clean and homelike condition for 6 of 13 residents (Resident 113, 99, 25, 9, 61 & 23) , failed to ensure privacy curtains were maintained in a clean sanitary condition (Residents 113 & 9) and failed to ensure resident rooms were personalized (Resident 23). These failures left residents at risk for a less than homelike environment and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy>According to the facility's July 2015 Homelike Environment policy, resident rooms would be personalized and organized in a manner that promotes independence through a homelike environment.<Resident 113> Observations on 12/12/2025 at 12:44 PM, 12/15/2025 at 9:46 AM and on 12/16/2025 at 12:09 PM, a privacy curtain in Resident 113's room, separating their room door and bed, was soiled with several small and large sized spots and splashes that were brown and red in color. <Resident 99> Observations on 12/12/2025 at 12:44 PM, 12/15/2025 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR - a process to determine if a potential nursing home resident had mental health/intellectual disability needs which required further assessment/treatment) assessment was accurate to reflect the mental health conditions for 4 of 5 residents (Resident 5, 6, 11, & 23) reviewed for PASRR/Unnecessary Medications. This failure placed residents at risk for inappropriate nursing home placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health needs.Findings included.<Policy>According to the facility's revised 01/01/2025 PASARR Process Policy and Procedure policy, facility would ensure all residents had a PASRR screening prior to admission and would keep a copy in the resident's record. The policy showed the facility's Social Services staff were responsible for ongoing maintenance of accurate PASRR screenings, and PASRR screening would be updated as needed to reflect changes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure Care Plans (CPs) were updated and/or revised as needed for 4 (Residents 10, 79, 23, & 5) of 25 sample residents reviewed. Failure to ensure CPs were updated to reflect current care needs left residents at risk for unmet care needs, delay in treatments, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy>On 12/16/2025, the facility administrator did not provide Care Planning policy and stated it was Standard of Practice. <Resident 10> According to the 11/23/2025 change of condition Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 10 was on end-of-life care services. The MDS showed Resident 10 had pressure areas on their heel and back areas. Review of the revised 11/24/2025 impairment to skin integrity CP showed interventions included hospice services for end-of-life care. The CP did not include staff interventions to address refusals of wound care treatments. Review of Resident 10's progress notes showed Resident 10 refused wound care treatments and/or wound skin assessments on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure: Physician's Orders (POs) were clarified and followed for 4 (Residents 11, 25, 120, & 23) of 25 sample residents; nurses did not document nonpharmacological interventions for pain medications for 1 (Resident 23); staff did not follow the oxygen orders, the facility Bowel Movement (BM) protocol and pain medication parameters as ordered for 1 (Resident 11); and devices in place without physician order for 1 (Resident 120) of 25 sample residents. These failures placed residents at risk for medication errors, delayed treatment, Resident Rights, adverse outcomes and diminished quality of life. Findings included .<Facility Policy> According to the facility's updated February 2025 Elopement/Wandering policy, if the facility used a monitoring system the facility would obtain a physician's order for use of the device prior to application and after consent was received.According to the facility's updated May 2025 Bowel Protocol, if a resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to offer and provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL) for 2 of 7 residents (Residents 23 & 79) reviewed who were dependent on staff for daily cares/ADLs. The failure to provide assistance with ADLs placed residents at risk for poor hygiene, diminished feeling of self-worth, and a decreased quality of life.Findings included .<Policy>Facility did not provide ADL policy.<Resident 23> According to the 10/03/2025 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS – an assessment tool) Resident 23 required staff assistance with ADLs. The MDS showed Resident 23 was frequently incontinent of urine and always incontinent of bowels. Review of Resident 23's 05/06/2025 ADL Care Plan (CP) showed they were dependent on staff for bathing, dressing, oral hygiene, and required a mechanical lift with two staff to transfer them out of bed. Review of Resident 23's health records showed an assigned bathing schedule for every Monday and Friday. September 2025 Point of Care (POC- nurse aide documentation) documentation showed Resident 23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the residents' environment was free of accident hazards by implementing their system for screening and storing hazardous toxic chemicals in 1 of 4 soiled utility rooms (2 [NAME] Soiled Utility Room) and 1 of 4 clean utility rooms (2 East Clean Utility Room), and 1 of 4 linen rooms (2 [NAME] Clean Linen Room) reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk of injury.Findings included.<Policy>According to the facility policy titled, Storage Areas, Environmental Services, revised February 2021, the facility would ensure housekeeping storage would be maintained in a safe manner.According to a facility policy titled, Medication Storage, dated 01/2023, medications would only be accessible to authorized staff.<2 [NAME] Soiled Utility Room>Observation, record review, and interview on 12/10/2026 at 9:03 AM showed 2 [NAME] Soiled Utility Room door not closed/locked. The soiled utility room had a bottle of shower cleaning chemical, one can of stainless-steel cleaner, and one container for Sani wipes filled with a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 46 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to appropriately use Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in accordance with Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP - infection control measures used to reduce the spread of multidrug-resistant organisms) for 2 supplemental residents (Residents 28 & 10) who required EBP reviewed for infection control. These failures placed residents at risk for the development and transmission of communicable diseases and an unclean environment.Findings included . <Facility Policy>According to the facility's March 2025 Transmission-Based Precautions policy, EBP required the use of gowns and gloves by care providers during high-contact resident care activities. <Resident 28> Observation on 12/12/2025 at 10:47 AM showed Resident 28's room had an EBP sign posted outside their door. The signage showed staff must clean their hands before entering the room, and wear gloves and gowns for high-contact resident care activities including dressing and transferring residents, providing hygiene and care of a urinary catheter (tubing to assist with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement an Antibiotic (ABO) Stewardship program to promote appropriate use of ABO and reduce the risk of unnecessary ABO use for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 8 & 4) reviewed for unnecessary antibiotics. This failure placed residents at risk for potential adverse outcomes associated with the inappropriate/unnecessary use of ABOs and placed residents at a greater risk of developing ABO resistance.Findings included.<Policy>According to the facility policy titled, ABO Stewardship Program, dated March 2018, the facility would ensure residents met the McGeers criteria (a tool used for infection surveillance activities and management of ABO usage) for ABO usage. The policy showed the facility would use standard evaluations and communication tools for residents with suspected infections, utilize Antibiogram reports, and implement ABO time outs. <Resident 8>Review of Resident 8's health records showed they received an ABO from 01/23/2025 until 02/02/2025 for a urinary tract infection. Resident 8's records also showed they received…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain infection control practices necessary to provide a safe and sanitary environment and prevent transmission of communicable diseases by having Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) available to staff for 12 of 19 residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10,11, &12) observed requiring Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) with specific diagnoses including wounds and indwelling medical devices. The facility failed to ensure alcohol-based hand sanitizer dispensers were properly functioning for 25 of 46 rooms (Rooms 202, 203, 204, 209,211, 208, 215, 216, & 218; and outside rooms 219, 250, 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 263, 264, 265, 266, 267, 268,270, 273, & 274) observed inside and along the hallway outside occupied resident rooms. These failures placed residents at risk for acquiring and developing communicable diseases, medical complications from infection, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the Enhanced Barrier Precautions-F880, facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-21 · tag F0552 — pattern
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided informed consent for treatments (ensuring an explanation of the risks and benefits was provided) for 3 of 5 (Residents 113, 21, & 17) residents whose medication regimen was reviewed. The failure to provide informed consent placed residents at risk for unwanted adverse side effects, unwanted treatment, and loss of autonomy. Findings included . <Resident 113> According to the 07/18/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 113 had diagnoses including depression and anxiety. The MDS showed Resident 113 received antidepressant and antianxiety medications. Review of the physician's orders showed a 04/26/2024 order for an antidepressant to be administered to Resident 113 at bedtime for insomnia. Record review showed no evidence the risks and benefits of the antidepressant medication were explained to Resident 113. There was no evidence Resident 113 consented to the medication prior to treatment. In an interview on 08/20/2024 at 4:50 PM Staff C (Regional Director of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-21 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the facility maintained a homelike environment for 2 of 4 units, and 1 of 1 entry way. The failure to ensure resident rooms were free of wall scrapes, stained doors and walls, damaged flooring, damaged closet doors, missing/damaged ceiling tiles, and dirty privacy curtains, and the failure to ensure the entry way was in good condition, placed residents at risk for a less than homelike environment, frustration, and a diminished sense of self-worth. Findings included . <100 Unit > Observations of the first-floor shower room door on 08/14/2024 at 1:27 PM showed multiple tan colored smears and marks on the outside visible from the hallway. In an interview on 08/21/2024 at 11:27 AM, Staff X (Maintenance Director) looked at the shower room door, stated it looked dirty and should be cleaned up and painted. Observations of the shared bathroom in room [ROOM NUMBER] on 08/15/2024 at 8:52 AM showed dried brown raised debris areas on the wall to the right of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-21 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system by which residents received required written notices at the time of transfer/discharge, or as soon as practicable for 5 (Residents 127, 34, 113, 55, & 96) of 7 residents reviewed for hospitalizations. Failure to provide written notification to the resident and/or the resident's representative of the reasons for the discharge in writing and in a language and manner they understood, placed residents at risk for a discharge that was not in alignment with the resident's stated goals for care and preferences. Findings included . <Resident 127> Review of Resident 127's 06/18/2024 Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE], with their return anticipated. Record review showed no documentation staff provided written notification to Resident 127 and/or the resident's representative regarding their discharge as required. <Resident 34> Review of Resident 34's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-21 · tag F0644 — pattern
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level II comprehensive evaluations were obtained for 3 (Residents 134, 85, & 113) of 7 sampled residents reviewed for PASRR evaluations. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving necessary mental health care and services. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the undated PASRR Completion facility policy showed the designated staff would make sure the PASRR was completed on all potential residents. This policy showed if the referral indicated the resident had a serious mental illness or intellectual disability, the PASRR would be completed prior to admission. <Resident 134> According to the 07/07/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 134 had no cognitive impairment and had diagnoses of anxiety disorder and a chronic mental illness that caused extreme mood swings. This MDS showed Resident 134 was not considered by the state level II PASRR…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-21 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    <Resident 113> According to the 07/18/2024 Quarterly MDS, Resident 113 had medically complex conditions including anxiety, depression, and opioid dependence. The MDS showed Resident 113 took antipsychotic, and antidepressant medications. Review of the physician's orders showed Resident 113 currently took two antidepressant medications and an antipsychotic medication from 03/28/2024 until discontinued on 07/25/2024. The indication for the antipsychotic medication was for auditory hallucinations. Review of the comprehensive Care Plan (CP) showed Resident 113 had a Target Behavior due to Psychosis CP. This CP included a goal for staff to assist Resident 113 with daily episodes of psychosis. Review of the 03/13/2024 Level I PASRR indicated Resident 113 had a mood disorder and an anxiety disorder. This Level I PASRR did not show Resident 113 had a psychosis diagnosis, or otherwise address Resident 113's auditory hallucinations. The form showed Resident 113 exhibited serious functional limitations in the past six months prior to completion of the form related to a serious mental illness.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY < Resident 55> According to the 06/21/2024 Quarterly MDS, Resident 55 had significant weight loss in the last six months and was not on prescribed weight loss regimen. The MDS showed Resident 55 required maximal assistance from staff with oral hygiene, eating, and toileting needs. Review of Resident 55's record showed Resident 55's weight on 01/04/2024 was 260 pounds and on 05/28/2024 was down to 221 pounds, representing a weight loss of 39 pounds in four months. Review of Resident 55's CP showed no documentation related to weight loss or any interventions for staff to follow. In an interview on 08/20/2024 at 2:17 PM, Staff H (Dietitian) stated they were aware of Resident 55's significant weight loss. Staff H stated Resident 55's CP should be updated accordingly. <Resident 99> According to the 07/01/2024 Quarterly MDS, Resident 99 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and had no memory impairment. Review of Resident 99's August 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed Resident 99 received an antibiotic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADL), related to cleanliness and grooming for 7 (Residents 21,55, 99, 134, 10, 150, & 71) of 10 sample residents reviewed for ADLs. Facility failure to provide residents who were dependent on staff for assistance with oral care, showers, getting out of bed, dressing, shaving, and nail care, placed the residents at risk for poor hygiene, greasy hair, long facial hair, embarrassment and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's revised March 2018 ADLs policy, residents would be provided with the care, treatment, and services needed to ensure they maintain or improve their ability to carry out their own ADLs. Residents unable to carry out their own ADLs, would be provided the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene. <Resident 21> According to the 05/14/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 (Resident 55) of 5 residents reviewed for Pressure Ulcers (PU's) received the necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, and prevent new ulcers from developing. Failure of the facility to consistently complete weekly skin assessments, assess skin integrity to identify PUs timely, ensure air mattress settings were appropriate according to resident's weight, repositioning in bed, update the Care Plan (CP) with Resident 55's refusals, and to follow the CP, placed Resident 55 at risk to develop a new PU, and diminished quality of life Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's revised April 2018 Pressure Ulcer/Skin Breakdown protocol, the facility would assess residents upon admission and thereafter, to identify if the residents had existing PU's or other skin conditions and would document the risk factors for developing PUs in resident's record. The protocol showed the provider would assess and order wound treatments,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review facility failed to maintain and environment that was free from accident hazards. The failure to: ensure appropriate supervision and storage of smoking materials for 1 of 2 sample residents (Resident 113) and 5 supplemental (Residents 135, 117, 54, 43, & 22) residents who smoked; failed to secure chemicals in 2 of 4 clean utility rooms; and failed to secure sharps in 1 of 4 clean utility rooms, placed residents at risk for smoking related injuries, accident hazards, and diminished safety. Findings included . <Smoking> <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's Smoking Policy revised June 2023 showed residents would be evaluated on admission to determine if they were a smoker or non-smoker. The evaluation would determine the resident's ability to smoke safely with or without supervision. This policy showed both independent smokers and residents assessed to require smoking supervision would not be permitted to keep cigarettes or other smoking materials in their possession. All smoking materials were to be locked with the activities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-21 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to establish and maintain infection control practices that provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases. The facility failed to: 1) perform Hand Hygiene (HH) during resident care and during dining service; 2) ensure staff used Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for residents reviewed for Transmission Based Precautions (TBP); 3) identify and initiate Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for residents who required EBP precautions; 4) ensure staff disposed of contaminated gloves before entering the hallway. These failures placed residents at risk for the development and transmission of communicable diseases and related complications. Findings included . <Facility Policies> According to a facility's revised 06/08/2022 Infection Prevention and Control Program (IPCP) policy, the IPCP would utilize a system for prevention, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or the resident's representative a written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy, at the time of transfer or within 24 hours, for 4 of 7 sample residents (Resident 127, 34, 55, & 96) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents and/or their representatives at risk of not being informed of their right to, or the cost of, holding the resident's bed while hospitalized that was necessary for decision-making. Findings included . <Resident 127 > In an interview on 08/15/2024 at 1:57 PM, Resident 127 stated they were previously sent to the hospital for stomach issues and blood loss. Review of Resident 127's 06/18/2024 Discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed the resident was transferred to an acute care hospital on [DATE], with their return anticipated. Record review showed no documentation or other indication the facility provided Resident 127 or their resident representative written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    <Signing For Tasks Not Completed> <Resident 10> Observations on 08/15/2024 at 8:58 AM showed Resident 10 with a pain medication patch on the top of their right ankle. This patch had a handwritten date of, 8/14. On 08/16/2024 at 8:42 AM, this same patch remained on Resident 10's right ankle. Review of August 2024 MAR showed orders for a pain medication patch to be applied to Resident 10 two times a day and gave an area for staff to document the patch was put on at 8:00 AM and removed each night at 8:00 PM. This MAR showed staff documented the patch was applied on 08/14/2024 and removed on 08/14/2024 but was still observed on Resident 10 two days later. In an interview and observation on 08/16/2024 at 9:01 AM, Staff Z (Licensed Practical Nurse) confirmed the pain medication patch was from two days prior, removed the patch, and stated, we should not have missed removing the patch. <Resident 85> According to the 07/04/2024 Quarterly MDS, Resident 85 had clear speech, intact memory, and had diagnoses including hypertension, history of pressure ulcers, chronic pain, and muscle weakness.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided with a program of individualized activities for 2 of 5 (Residents 95 & 150) residents reviewed for activities. These failures left residents at risk for boredom and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's revised June 2018 Activity Programs policy, the purpose of the activity program was to support residents' wellbeing with independent and group activities. The policy showed activity programs were designed for maximum individual participation. <Resident 95> According to the 06/06/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 95 was assessed with a slightly impaired mood and diagnoses including anxiety and depression. The MDS showed all activity preferences were very important to Resident 95. The MDS showed Resident 95 was dependent on staff to get out of bed. Record review showed a 09/19/2023 Activities Care Plan (CP) developed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice to attain or maintain their highest practicable level of well-being for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 60 & 85) reviewed. The facility failed to ensure Resident 60 was provided pain management, services for loose stools, or follow the Care Plan (CP) for 1 of 1 residents for edema (swelling caused by too much fluid trapped in the body tissue). These failures placed the residents at increased risk of worsening conditions, discomfort, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Pain Management> <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's undated Wound Care policy showed the policy included guidelines for preparation of wound care, reviewing the resident's CP to determine any special needs of the resident including administering pain medication prior to wound care. Review of the facility's Skin Breakdown-Clinical Protocol policy revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 2 of 4 residents (Residents 21 & 71) reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence, received the care and services necessary to maintain and avoid loss of bowel and bladder functions. This failure placed the residents at risk for continued decline in bowel and bladder function, skin issues, and feelings of frustration and embarrassment. Findings included . <Resident 21> According to the 05/14/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 21 had impaired memory. The MDS showed Resident 21 required one person assistance with personal hygiene and had no rejection of care behavior during the assessment period. The MDS showed Resident 21 was occasionally incontinent of bowel and bladder. Observations on 08/15/2024 at 11:29 AM showed Resident 21 was lying in bed. Resident 21's room had a strong urine odor. Observation on 08/16/2024 at 10:24 AM showed Resident 21 out of their bed with their clothes wet with urine. Resident 21 went to the bathroom, changed their clothes and sat in a chair…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-21 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medications were stored, labeled, and dated when opened and/or discarded when expired for 4 of 4 medication carts (100 Hall Cart 1, 200 Hall Cart 1, 200 Hall Cart 2, & 300 Hall Cart 1) and 2 of 2 medication rooms (Unit 200 East & Unit 200 West) observed. The failure to ensure unneeded medications and medical supplies were returned to the pharmacy or discarded when expired, medication refrigerators were monitored for appropriate temperatures, and medications were labeled for individual use placed residents at risk for ineffective treatment, expired medications, and contaminated medications Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's revised November 2020 Storage of Medications Policy, drugs and biologicals must be appropriately stored, including being locked and kept at the correct temperature. This policy showed nursing staff were responsible to ensure medication storage areas were clean. The policy showed discontinued, outdated, and deteriorated medications should be disposed of or returned to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide cares and services consistent with professional standards of practice to promote the healing of existing pressure ulcers. Failure to provide the dietary supplement, Impact Advanced Recovery Oral Liquid, that 1 (Resident 1) of 8 residents reviewed for dietary supplements as ordered, left Resident 1 at risk for a decline in wound healing and weight loss. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled nursing care related to wound care and infection of the sacrum (lowest 5 bones of the spine). Physician Orders (PO) showed Impact Advanced Recovery Oral Liquid (IAROL- nutritional supplement for wound healing) was ordered on 08/22/2023 and to be given one time a day, for 62 days, to aid in wound healing. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) dated 08/28/2023, showed Resident 1 admitted with bone infections of the lower vertebra (back bones), the tailbone, and an unstageable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-06-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain clean, sanitary surfaces and equipment in the kitchen and care floor utility rooms in accordance with standards for food service safety. The failure to 1) maintain a clean/sanitized kitchen, 2) maintain clean/sanitized ice machines, 3) maintain clean/sanitized microwaves, and 4) monitor/maintain resident refrigerator temperatures, placed residents at risk for cross-contamination, food-borne illnesses, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Kitchen Sanitation> Initial kitchen observation on 06/08/2023 at 8:50 AM showed four metal kitchen racks holding clean pots, pans, bowls, and warming pans. The racks had multiple areas of rust and were layered with dust and had dust webs hanging from the upper shelves over the clean cookware. The dust on the underside of the rack was removed with a swipe of a bare hand. The ledge on the wall behind the racks of clean cookware had a thick layer of dark dust that could be removed with a finger swipe. The corners of the floors had food debris and crumbs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-14 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure conveyance (the act of legally transferring property from one entity to another) of a resident's trust funds, including a final accounting of those funds within 30 days of discharge for 2 of 2 discharged residents (Residents 602 & 603) reviewed for trust accounts. This failure prevented the residents from having access to their funds after leaving the facility. Findings included . Review of the 06/07/2023 facility trust fund balance sheet showed Resident 602 had a balance of $75.39. Resident 603 had a balance of $600.59. In an interview on 06/09/2023 at 2:28 PM, Staff BBB (Business Office Assistant) stated Resident 602 discharged [DATE] and Resident 603 discharged on 05/06/2022. In an interview on 06/09/2023 at 2:32 PM, Staff AAA (Business Office Manager) confirmed Resident 602 and Resident 603 discharged and both had money in their trust fund. Staff AAA stated it was important to refund money because it belongs to the resident to use for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a safe, clean, and comfortable environment was provided. Facility failure to: maintain a clean and homelike environment on 3 of 4 units (the 2 East Unit & the 100 Unit); ensure handrails were secure for 2 of 4 units (the 100 Unit & the 300 Unit); ensure residents were able to secure their property for 1 of 29 sample residents (Resident 113), left residents at risk for a less then homelike environment, and missing property. Findings included . <Resident Rooms> Observation on 06/08/2023 at 8:58 AM showed 2 boxes of incontinence supplies left on the floor on the bed 2 side of room [ROOM NUMBER]. The top dresser drawer on the bed 2 side was crooked and did not close fully. Observation on 06/08/2023 at 2:17 PM showed Resident 23's half of room [ROOM NUMBER] was cluttered and un-homelike. The wall behind Resident 23's bed was observed with 18 spots where the drywall was repaired but not repainted, including an 18-inch-high patch of wall…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-14 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 9 (Residents 13, 91, 10, 68, 137, 58, 42, 76 & 98) of 29 residents' Minimum Data Sets (MDS- an assessment tool) were completed accurately to reflect the residents' condition. This failure placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet needs. Findings included . <Resident 13> According to the 03/23/2023 quarterly MDS, Resident 13's primary language was Cantonese. The MDS showed Resident 13 completed a Brief Interview for Mental Status Assessment (BIMS - an assessment of memory and orientation to time) and was unable to answer any of the questions. In an interview on 06/13/2023 at 12:09 PM, Staff CC (Social Services) stated they were unable to determine from the assessment if Resident 13 answered the BIMS questions with the assistance of an interpreter or not. Staff CC stated it was noted in the record as of July 2022 that Resident 13 was unable to complete a BIMS assessment and that instead staff should assess Resident 13's memory/time orientation status. Staff CC stated they were unaware of any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-14 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure: Care Plans (CPs) were implemented and revised as needed for 10 of 32 sample residents (Residents 10, 136, 137, 48, 84, 95, 58, 113, 74, & 132 ) and care planning conferences were conducted as required for 1 of 8 sample residents (Resident 23). These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Care Planning Conferences> <Resident 23> The 05/23/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed Resident 23's preferences for choice of clothing, taking care of their belongings, choosing between a bath and shower, bed time, private phone use, and having a place to secure their things were very important to them. The MDS showed Resident 23 had medically complex diagnoses including dementia, malnutrition, anxiety, and kidney issues requiring hemodialysis (a treatment to filter wastes and water from the blood). In an interview on 06/08/2023 at 2:16 PM, Resident 23 stated they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to rotate injection sites for 1 (Resident 76) of 32 sampled residents, monitor for adverse side effects for 1 (Resident 98) of 32 sampled residents, follow Physician Orders (POs) for 2 (Residents 68 & 41) of 32 sampled Residents, clarifying POs for 3 (Residents 68, 48 & 42) of 32 sampled residents, signing for tasks not completed for 1 (Resident 68) of 32 sampled residents, and providing treatment without a PO for 1 (Resident 58) of 32 sampled residents. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, adverse side effects of medications going unnoticed by nursing staff, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Injection Sites> <Resident 76> Review of a 05/08/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) showed Resident 76 had a diagnosis of diabetes (a blood sugar disorder). Review of Resident 76's June 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed Resident 76 received an injection of a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were dependent on staff to meet their Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) needs, were consistently provided necessary assistance for 7 (Residents 68, 84, 41, 42, 76, 11 & 132) of 12 sample residents reviewed. Failure to provide assistance to residents who were dependent on staff for bathing, oral care, nail care, assistance to get out of bed, and dressing placed residents at risk for unmet needs, poor hygiene, embarrassment, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 68> According to a 05/18/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 68 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including a stroke and required physical assistance from staff for bed mobility, transfers, and personal hygiene, and was totally dependent on staff for bathing. This MDS showed staff assessed Resident 68 to be cognitively intact and had no rejection of care during the assessment period. According to a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure activity programs met the needs of each resident for 5 of 8 residents (Residents 23, 48, 74, 132 & 61) reviewed for activities. Failure to provide residents with meaningful activities left residents at risk for boredom, frustration, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> According to the facility's 06/2018 Activity Evaluation policy, activities were assessed in order to promote the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of residents. Assessments were conducted at least quarterly and with any change that could affect resident participation. <Resident 23> The 05/15/2023 Activity Participation Review showed Resident 23's favorite activities, special accomplishments, and/or new interests included reading a lot of books, watching TV/Movies, Coloring, Crochet[ing], and utilizing [their electronic] tablet . According to the 05/23/2023 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review the facility failed to ensure 4 of 5 (Residents 13, 48, 42, & 113) residents reviewed for positioning, Range of Motion (ROM), and mobility, and 1 supplemental resident (Resident 84) received the care and services they were assessed to require. These failures placed residents at risk for decline in ROM, increased dependence on staff, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 13> According to the 03/23/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 13 had diagnoses including stroke, left-sided immobility, loss of speech, and used a wheelchair. The MDS showed Resident 13 was totally dependent on staff assistance for bed mobility and transfers. The 07/31/2019 Requires assistance with ADLs [Activities of Daily Living] . Care Plan (CP) included a 07/31/2023 intervention for left arm trough (a scooped arm rest that provided additional support for a person whose arm was immobilized). The 11/06/2020 Limited Physical Mobility . CP…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the facility was free of accident hazards for 4 of 9 residents (Residents 91, 95, 113 & 66) reviewed for accidents and 3 supplemental residents (553, 74 & 61). The failure to ensure mattresses were installed correctly (Residents 91, 113 & 66), wheelchair brakes were not used when not required by the resident (Residents 553, 95 & 61), and resident bedsides were free of hazards (Resident 74) left residents at risk for accidents, injuries, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Resident Beds and Mattresses> <Resident 91> According to the 04/18/2023 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 91 had severe memory/time orientation impairment, required extensive assistance with bed mobility and transfers. The MDS showed Resident 91 had diagnoses including non-traumatic brain dysfunction, dementia, and left hip pain. The 05/01/2023 Falls Risk Assessment showed Resident 91 fell while a resident and took medications that increased their risk of falls. The assessment showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-14 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure proper consistency and nutritional value was maintained to meet the nutritional needs for 21 residents prescribed a ground (crushed/ minced) and/or pureed (pudding-like) textured diet. The failure to follow the written recipe did not ensure the proper consistency or flavor of food served and placed the residents at risk for a diminished dining experience, and inadequate nutritional intake potentially leading to malnutrition and weight loss. Additionally, the facility failed to provide food that was palatable, attractive, and an appetizing temperature for 2 of 10 resident (Residents 125 & 66) reviewed for food and nutrition services. This failure placed residents at risk for a diminished dining experience, less than adequate nutritional intake, and potential weight loss. Findings included . <Food Meets Nutritional Needs> Review of the 06/08/2023 Diet Type Report showed seven residents were prescribed a pureed texture diet. The report showed 14 residents were prescribed a ground texture diet. A total of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-14 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that accommodated residents' food preferences and/or intolerances, provide options of similar nutrient value or provide opportunity to residents to request a different meal choice for 5 of 16 sampled residents (Residents 68, 137, 48, 11 & 23) and 1 supplemental resident (Resident 67) reviewed for food choices. The failure to 1) offer residents choices of foods served to them at meals, 2) provide food that followed the residents' personal likes/dislikes, 3) offer substitutions when residents were served foods they did not like and/or 4) offer replacements or supplements when meals were not eaten, placed residents at risk for malnutrition, weight loss and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policies> The revised 7/2017 Resident Food Preference facility policy showed the food services department would 1) identify resident food preferences within 24 hours of admission, 2) interview the resident directly to determine current food preferences, 3) document food and eating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to consistently implement hand hygiene during care for 4 of 4 units (2 East, 2 West, and 3rd Floor), ensure staff used required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE - gowns, gloves, or masks) appropriately while providing care for a resident under isolation precautions for 1 of 1 resident(Resident 55) requiring isolation and ensure shared resident equipment was clean on 1 of 4 units (2 West). These failures placed the residents at risk for exposure to infectious diseases. Finding included . <Hand Hygiene> The facility's 08/2019 Hand Hygiene policy showed staff were expected to perform hand hygiene before and after direct contact with residents, after contact with objects in the immediate vicinity of the residents, before and after handling food, and before and after assisting a resident with meals. Observation on 06/08/2023 at 11:54 AM showed Staff FF (Certified Nursing Assistant - CNA) entered room [ROOM NUMBER] and moved the over-bed table in front of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to allow 4 (Residents 68, 48, 66, & 125) of 8 residents reviewed for choices, the right to make choices regarding important daily routines and health care, including accommodating preferences for the frequency and/or type of bathing, ability to access the community at leisure, and have access to water pitchers. The facility's failure to accommodate resident choice placed these residents at risk for a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Bathing> <Resident 68> According to a 05/18/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 68 was cognitively intact with clear speech, able to make self-understood, and understands others. This MDS showed it was very important for Resident 68 to choose between a tub bath, shower, bed bath, or sponge bath and was assessed to be totally dependent on staff for bathing. According to a 05/11/2023 Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Care Plan (CP) Resident 68 required assistance with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were hospitalized emergently were offered a bed hold (the opportunity to pay for the bed the resident currently occupied while out of the facility in order to ensure their bed/room was available when ready to return) for 2 of 7 residents (Resident 121 & 58) reviewed for hospitalization. Failure to offer bed holds placed residents at risk for unwanted, avoidable room changes upon readmission, and frustration. Findings included . <Resident 121> According to the 05/10/2023 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 121 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute hospital. The MDS showed Resident 121 had medically complex diagnoses including Diabetes Mellitus (difficulty controlling blood sugar), a bone infection, and a chronic ulcer (non-healing skin wound) of the left heel and midfoot. In an interview on 06/08/2023 at 10:18 AM Resident 121 stated they were hospitalized a couple of times since first…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) assessments accurately reflected residents' mental health conditions for 2 of 5 (Resident 137 & 58) residents reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed residents at risk for inappropriate placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health needs. Findings included . <Resident 137> According to the 03/27/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 137 had multiple medically complex diagnoses including anxiety and required the use of an antianxiety and antidepressant medication. Review of March, April, and May 2023 Medication Administration Records showed Resident 137 was receiving a medication for depression. Review of a 05/26/2023 Level 1 PASRR showed staff identified Resident 137's only Serious Mental Illness (SMI) indicator was an anxiety disorder. Staff did not identify Resident 137 had depression and required the use of medications. In an interview on 06/14/2023 at 12:34 PM, Staff M (Social Service…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop person-centered comprehensive Care Plans (CPs) for 4 (Residents 68, 58, 76, & 98) of 32 residents whose CPs were reviewed. Facility failure to develop individualized, comprehensive CPs left residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . <Resident 68> According to a 05/18/2023 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 68 had multiple complex medical diagnoses including heart failure. In an interview on 06/08/2023 at 12:17 PM, Resident 68 stated, I have plenty of trouble with my teeth and indicated they had some broken teeth. The resident stated they were not able to hear others very well. On 06/10/2023 at 9:28 AM Resident 68 stated they were unable to read their daily newsletter because their glasses were not too helpful. Review of a 05/16/2023 Care Conference assessment showed staff identified Resident 68 had poor dental status with chipped teeth, poor hearing status, with no hearing aids, and was hard of hearing, A 05/18/2023 Activities admission progress note showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure communication needs were met for 3 of 11 residents (Residents 91, 13 & 74) reviewed for alternative communication. Failure to ensure care planned communication interventions were implemented left residents at risk for unmet needs, frustration, social isolation, and a diminished sense of well-being. Findings included . <Resident 13> According to the 03/23/2023 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) Resident 13 was assessed with no speech. Resident 13 was assessed to rarely/never understand or be understood in conversation. The MDS showed Resident 13's vision was highly impaired and they did not use corrective lenses. Resident 13's 11/02/2022 Care Area Assessment (CAA) worksheet showed Resident 13 was at risk for having unmet needs related to their language and speech difficulties. The CAA showed Resident 13 did not understand English. The 07/31/2019 Communication Deficit . Care Plan (CP) showed Resident 13 was able to nod and smile when spoken to. The CP included interventions to maximize…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: ensure newly identified skin issues, were assessed, and treated as required for 3 of 10 residents reviewed for skin conditions (Resident 13, 58, & 132); provide treatment residents were assessed to require for 2 of 29 sample residents (Residents 91 & 121); reposition the resident according to the Care Plan (CP) for 1 of 10 residents (Resident 95). These failures placed residents at risk for avoidable or worsening skin issues, and other negative health outcomes. Findings included . <Skin Impairments> <Resident 13> According to the facility's 2018 Pressure Ulcers [PU]/Skin Breakdown - Clinical Protocol for a wound, nurses completed a full assessment of the wound including location, stage (assessment of severity), length, width and depth, presence of exudate (drainage) or necrotic (dead) tissue. The policy showed the physician should help identify the factors that contributed to the wound development, clarify any relevant medical issues, and order pertinent treatments such as pressure reducing approaches,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a licensed pharmacist's monthly Medication Regimen Reviews (MRRs) were added to resident records and recommendations were reviewed and incorporated for 3 of 5 (Resident 58, 76, & 98) residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk for delays in necessary medication changes and at risk of receiving medications without required pharmacist oversight. <Facility Policy> According to a January 2023 MRR and Reporting facility policy, the MRR consisted of a review of residents' medical records in order to prevent, identify, report, and resolve medication related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities. This policy indicated the facility's consultant pharmacist would review the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly. MRR recommendations and findings would be documented and acted upon by the nursing care center and/or physician. A record of the consultant pharmacist's observations and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents remained free of unnecessary psychotropic medications for 2 (Residents 48 & 58) of 5 sample residents whose medications were reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. Failure to identify the adequate indications for use/extended use, identify triggers or specific behaviors, document behaviors, attempt Gradual Dose Reductions (GDR) or implement non-pharmaceutical interventions before administering medication, and failure to obtain informed consent prior to administration of Anti-Psychotic (AP) medications placed residents at risk of receiving unnecessary psychotropic medications, experiencing medication-related adverse side effects (ASE), and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The revised [DATE] Antipsychotic Medication Use facility policy showed the need to continue PRN (as needed) orders for psychotropic medications beyond 14 days required the practitioner to document the rationale…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure: (1) medications were labeled with pharmacy labels to include the resident's name, cautionary instructions, and expiration dates when applicable, (2) expired medications were disposed of timely for 2 of 4 (2 [NAME] Medication Cart A and B) medication carts and 1 of 2 (2 [NAME] Medication Room) medication rooms reviewed for medication labelling and storage, and (3) medications were secured for 1 of 1 (Resident 68) residents observed with medications at bedside. These failures placed residents at risk for medication errors, receiving compromised medications with decreased or no potency, and inadvertent self-administration of medications by residents. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The 2007 Medication Storage facility policy showed medications should be stored properly, and staff should follow manufacturer's or pharmacist's recommendations to support safe and effective drug administration. The policy instructed the pharmacist to dispense medications in containers that met state and federal labeling requirements.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt dental services were provided for 1 of 9 (Resident 113) residents reviewed for dental care. This failure placed Resident 113 and all other residents at risk for unmet dental needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Facility Policy> The revised 12/2013 Dental Examination/Assessment facility policy showed each resident would undergo a dental assessment prior to or within 90 days of admission. The policy showed dental examinations were conducted either by the resident's personal dentist or by the facility consultant dentist. The policy outlined, upon completion of dental examination, residents in need of dental care services would be promptly referred to a dentist, and records of dental care provided were made part of the resident's medical records. <Resident 113> According to the 10/30/2022 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool), Resident 113 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-14 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish an infection prevention and control program that included developing an antibiotic stewardship program to promote appropriate use of Antibiotics (ABO's) and reduce the risk of unnecessary ABO use for 2 of 3 (Residents 452 & 58) residents reviewed for unnecessary ABO's.This failure placed residents at risk for potential adverse outcomes, associated with the inappropriate / unnecessary use of ABO's. Finding included . <Facility Policy> The facility's 12/2016 Antibiotic Stewardship policy showed the purpose for their ABO stewardship program was to monitor the use of ABOs in their residents. This policy showed the facility expected, when a Culture and Sensitivity (C&S) was ordered, that those results and current clinical situation would be communicated with the facility provider as soon as available to determine if ABO therapy should be continued, modified, or discontinued. <Resident 452> Review of Resident 452's physician orders showed that an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident 48) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications reviewed for vaccinations, received information on the current recommendations from the Center for Disease and Control and Prevention (CDC) related to Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccinations, and failed to ensure residents were offered the recommended vaccinations. This failure placed residents at risk for contracting Influenza and pneumonia, with its associated complications of infection. Findings included . According to the revised October 2019 Pneumococcal Vaccine policy, prior to or upon admission, residents would be assessed for eligibility to receive the pneumococcal vaccine series, and when indicated, would be offered the vaccine series within 30 days of admission to the facility unless medically contraindicated or the resident had already been vaccinated. Assessments of pneumococcal vaccination status would be conducted within 5 working days of the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-14 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: (1) assess the compatibility of the mattress used and/or purchased separately from the bed frame for unsafe gaps, and (2) conduct routine inspections of all bed frames and mattresses as part of a regular maintenance program for 2 of 2 (Resident 113 & 66) resident beds reviewed for accident hazards. These failures placed residents at risk for injury, entrapment, or death. Findings included . <Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Document> The 03/10/2006 FDA document entitled, Hospital Bed System Dimensional and Assessment Guidance to Reduce Entrapment, identified seven potential zones of entrapment: Zone 1- Within the Rail, Zone 2- Under the Rail, Between the Rail Supports or Next to a Single Rail Support, Zone 3- Between the Rail and the Mattress, Zone 4- Under the Rail at the Ends of the Rail, Zone 5- Between Split Bed Rails, Zone 6- Between the End of the Rail and the Side Edge of the Head or Foot Board, and Zone 7- Between the Head or Foot Board and the End of the Mattress. The document showed facilities…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$52,007 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

  • $12,438 — penalty dated 2025-09-18
  • $10,358 — penalty dated 2025-08-07
  • $29,211 — penalty dated 2024-05-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WCC OPERATOR HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 04/01/2020
CH HEARTWOOD WASHINGTON HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2020
HEARTWOOD WASHINGTON CARE OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 04/01/2020
COUVE HEALTHCARE CONSULTING LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/03/2025
VERITAS HEALTH SOLUTIONS LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/04/2025
WCC EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2020
WCC OPERATOR LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2020
AMADEI GATTI, CARLAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2020
DOEPKE, TAMIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2020
HERZKA, YISROELIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2020
KOPELOWITZ, SHAULIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2020
YENOWITZ, YITZCHOKIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2020

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$20.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-5.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.3M
Related-party expense11% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 75%Medicare 5%Other / private 20%

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$390per resident / day
operating cost
$11,841per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$370per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505017. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-16, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next