Yakima Valley School

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 112 beds and averages 47.3 residents a day — about 42% occupied, or roughly 65 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 16.60 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 2.13 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 13.74 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 7 of 11 staff (Staff M, O, Q, D, F, J, and H) immediately (not later than two hours after the allegation was made) reported allegations of abuse to the facility administration and State Agency (SA) and to implement timely interentions to protect 2 of 2 residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3) reviewed for abuse reporting. This failure placed the residents at risk for continued abuse, potential for harm, and diminished quality of life and constituted an immediate jeopardy (IJ). On 08/29/2024 the facility was notified of the noncompliance identified at the level of an IJ in F-Tag 609, 42 CFR §483.12(c)(1) Reporting of Alleged Violations, for failure to ensure staff reported alleged abuse immediately to both the facility Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) and Stage Agency (SA) abuse hotline that resulted in a delay of up to 17 days to remove the alleged perpetrators from direct resident care. The facility removed the immediacy on 08/30/2024 with an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure supervision for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for dental sedation. The failure to follow post sedation safety protocol resulted in Resident 1 to have an unwitnessed fall that caused a 10-centimeter (cm) laceration mid forehead that required 11 staples at the hospital. Findings included.Record review of facility's policy titled, Level of Supervision (LOS) 1.08, dated 10/2024, showed that a LOS would be assigned to provide an appropriate degree of supervision for each resident. Direct care staff would check the LOS assigned in the resident's record daily. Definition for LOS 3 was supervision must be positioned in a manner to protect the resident from or deter danger. Enhanced staffing [was] required.Record review of facility's policy titled, Nursing Standard Operating Procedure IV.A.17 Sedation, dated 02/2024, showed that after receiving sedation, the Attendant Counselor (AC, a nursing assistant) would maintain close observation of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care, the assessed level of supervision and assistance were consistently provided to prevent an avoidable accident for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for falls with injury. Resident 1 experienced harm when they were left unsupervised, had an unwitnessed fall or contact with a firm surface and developed a hematoma (a localized collection of clotted blood that pools outside of the blood vessels, similar to a bruise) to the right eye. Findings included . Record review of facility's policy titled, Level of Supervision (LOS) 1.08, dated 10/2024, showed that a LOS would be assigned to provide an appropriate degree of supervision for each resident. Direct care staff will check the LOS assigned in the resident's record daily. Definition for LOS 3 was supervision must be positioned in a manner to protect the resident from or deter (prevent) danger. Enhanced staffing [was] required. <Resident 1> Record review showed Resident 1 was a long-term resident of the facility with a diagnosis that included severe…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from physical abuse for 2 of 2 cognitively impaired residents (Resident 1 and Resident 3) reviewed for allegations of abuse. This failure resulted in physical harm when Resident 1 who had severe cognitive impairment, dependence on staff, and was unable to express discomfort, was kicked in the face. Resident 1 experienced psychosocial harm, applying the reasonable person concept when Resident 1 had a change in sleep behaviors and eating patterns and seemed more withdrawn. This failure placed the residents at risk for further abuse, injury, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the State Operations Manual (SOM), Psychosocial Outcome Severity Guide dated 10/24/2022, showed when a resident's reaction to a deficient practice (such as physical abuse) were markedly incongruent (or different) with the level of reaction a reasonable person in the resident's position would have to the physical abuse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0566 — isolated
  1) Protect residents from being forced to work at the nursing home, or 2) let residents work if they want to.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who had expressed the need/desire to work, had previously worked and agreed to the work arrangements, was given the choice to perform voluntary services at the facility for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 44) reviewed for resident rights. This failure placed the resident at risk of confusion/frustration with facility staff and an increased risk of behaviors regarding their choice/arrangement to work.Finding included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, revised January 2025, showed the facility resident had the right to participate in the development of their plan of care and they would be .permitted successive degrees of freedom of movement and opportunities/responsibility for self-management and independent decision making. Review of Resident 44's medical record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Autistic Disorder (a condition related to the brains development…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were given the opportunity to formulate advanced directives (AD, a legal document in which an individual person specifies what actions should be taken for their health care and/or finances in the event they were no longer are able to make decisions for themselves because of illness or incapacity) nor notify a resident of their right to formulate an AD when the resident was able to make the decision regarding their rights for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 44) reviewed for AD. This failure denied the resident the right to make an informed decision regarding formulation of an AD and placed residents at risk for losing the right to have their preferences and choices honored regarding emergent/end-of-life care.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Resident Rights, revised January 2025, showed the facility resident had the right .to participate in the development of the plan for services and medical treatment, including the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 38) reviewed for abuse/neglect. This failure placed the residents at risk of experiencing fear, intimidation, mental anguish, and emotional distress. Findings included . Resident 38 Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included severe intellectual disabilities (condition that involves limitations on intelligence, learning and everyday abilities to live independently), osteoarthritis (changes in bone shape and cartilage that causes inflammation which results in pain in joints, stiffness and loss of mobility), obsessive compulsive disorder (a pattern of unwanted thoughts and fears known as obsessions that lead to repetitive behaviors called compulsive acts that interfere with daily living). The 03/11/2026 quarterly nursing assessment showed the resident was unable to communicate verbally but…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse policy regarding identifying, reporting, and investigating potential allegations of abuse for 1of 1 sampled residents (Resident 38), reviewed for abuse. This failure to recognize abuse, to timely report allegations of potential abuse, and to conduct timely and thorough investigations based all residents in the facility at risk for abuse. Findings included. Review of the 07/2024 policy 15.3, Protection from Abuse: Mandatory Reporting, showed when identifying abuse or a reasonable cause of good faith intent of the circumstances presented to report to Residential Care Services for adults to the Complaint Resolution Unit (CRU) as mandated for incidents of abuse and supervisor/ administration of the facility that provides services to these residents/clients involved. The scope of the policy 15.3 showed that the policy was to be given to all contractors, volunteers, employees, interns, residential service providers on the requirements of mandatory reporting requirements.Review of the 12/2024 number 2.02…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nurses consistently documented the condition of a pressure injury (PI, localized damage to the skin as well as underlying soft tissue that occurs due to sustained pressure, often over bony areas) that included an initial wound assessment and periodic follow up assessments for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 15) reviewed for PI. In addition, the facility failed to open a plan of care that included specific interventions to promote healing of the PI. This failure placed Resident 15 at risk of delayed healing having unevaluated changes to their pressure injury to inform the provider for assessment and treatment orders. Findings included. Record review of the facility's policy titled, Pressure Sore-Decubitus Ulcer (PI) care and prevention dated 08/29/2025, showed the purpose of the policy was to prevent and treat further pressure injuries, the licensed nurse (LN) was responsible to document the condition of the wound including stage, size,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program that ensured, A) the Legionella (a waterborne bacteria that can cause a severe respiratory disease) Water Management Program (WMP) identification and monitoring of control measures within acceptable ranges and what ways to intervene when control measures were not met for 1 of 1 WMP, reviewed for infection control and B) the facility staff implemented the cleaning/disinfecting of the general environmental surfaces and resident rooms with an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) registered disinfectant 3 of 4 staff (Staff AA, CC, BB), reviewed for environmental cleaning/disinfection. This failure increased risk for exposure to cross contamination (harmful spread of diseases) and transmission of infectious diseases.Findings included .Review of the facility's WMP, dated March 2026, showed where control measures should be applied and required to be monitored for the facility's seven sets of cottages (a small house that a limited number of residents reside…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to ensure consistent one to one supervision for 2 of 4 residents (Resident 2, Resident 1) reviewed for accidents, when Resident 2 experienced a superficial scalp laceration of unknown origin and Resident 1 was left on the toilet for an unknown about of time without staff supervision at the door. This failure placed the residents at risk for accidents, injuries and diminished quality of life.Findings included Record review of the facility's policy titled, Level of Supervision, LOS, dated 10/07/2024, showed that a LOS was assigned to provide an appropriate degree of supervision for each resident to promote the free exercise of a resident's rights while also ensuring the safety of residents and staff. LOS level 4 was one-to-one supervision allowing as much social space as possible. Supervision must be positioned in a manner to prevent danger or harm to self or others.Resident 2Record review showed Resident 2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include autistic disorder (a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR, a screening required to be completed prior to admission to a nursing home that looked for indicators that one may have a mental disorder or intellectual disability) were completed for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 4), reviewed for PASRR's. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving inadequate mental health interventions, an increase in avoidable behaviors, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Record review of facility's policy titled, Admissions 1.08, dated 08/2025, showed that a PASRR Level 1 form would be completed prior to a resident's admission to the facility. Record review of facility's policy titled, Residential Habilitation Center Admissions, 17.01.02, dated 08/2024, showed that before a resident's admission for nursing facility services, the facility must ensure the Level 1 PASRR was complete and accurate. Resident 4 Record review of Resident 4's medical…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-06 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — pattern
  Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that physical restraints (any manual method, physical or mechanical device, equipment or material, attached or adjacent to the residents body, that cannot be removed by the resident and restricts the resident's freedom of movement) were implemented in a safe manner, had the required resident specific medical symptoms (which warranted the use of physical restraints) identified, medical provider orders for the use of the specific type of physical restraint were obtained, nor that least restrictive measures were utilized to treat a resident's medical symptoms for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 20, 3 and 15), reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed residents at an increased risk for injury, a loss of their freedom of movement and adverse mental health effects regarding their well-being, independence and self-direction. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Use of Restrictive Procedures, revised December 2024, showed that a medical professional would place an order for medically…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-06-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there were optimal nursing staff in order to provide appropriate supervision and individualized care needed based on the acuity (the level of severity of residents' illnesses, physical, mental, cognitive limitations, and conditions) level of care required for 6 of 10 residents (Residents 2, 6, 23, 10, 15, and 17) reviewed for staffing. This failed practice placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, not receiving care planned interventions, and negative outcomes. Findings included . Review of a policy dated 10/2024, titled Level of Supervision (LOS), showed that a LOS was to be assigned to each resident to provide an appropriate degree of supervision to protect their rights, keep them safe, and to staff to the maximum extent reasonable. The LOS showed: • LOS 1- staff should have general knowledge of where residents are and what they are doing. • LOS 2- staff were to have knowledge of where the residents were at, at all times, who they were with, and what they were doing. • LOS 3- staff supervision…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

What families pay in WA