No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Rockwood South Hill

East 2903 25th Avenue, Spokane, WA 99223 · Non profit - Corporation · 45 certified beds · (509) 536-6650 Medicare only — no Medicaid

Call the home — (509) 536-6650 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citations — no harm found (F0607, F0609) — most recent Dec 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

2/5
CMS overall
2 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
123 E Indiana Ave · (866) 904-7721 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2820 N Astor St · (509) 343-3100 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
210 E North Foothills Dr · (509) 325-5611 · Call to confirm hours
Park
501 W Park Pl · (509) 981-5555 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
417 E Dalton Ave · (509) 867-9635

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased34.7%14.2%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.3%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.7%1.0%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.9%1.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%17.7%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.4%2.6%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened42.0%17.2%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication14.1%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine89.3%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.6%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control35.1%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table9.7%15.1%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication4.3%1.3%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine67.4%82.0%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission21.0%19.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit4.3%13.4%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.631.331.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.321.521.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

57.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.1%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
51.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.43U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.23hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 51.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF57.8%CMS range 46.2–69.851.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.1%CMS range 6.0–13.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge51.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge37.8%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge27.0%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified92.7%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge95.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 3.5–12.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.861.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.57
RN hours/ resident / day
0.36
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.89
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.83
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
1.11
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 45 beds and averages 34.6 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.83 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.89 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.06 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.76 to 1.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

13
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-23)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-09)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

46 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to date, cover and discard expired food in the dry storage areas and 1 of 3 refrigerators (refrigerator 1), dishwasher final rinse temperatures were not maintained as required for the dishwasher, and refrigerator and freezer temperatures were not maintained at the required ranges for 2 of 2 dining room refrigerators (DR refrigerator 1 and DR refrigerator 2). The facility further failed to complete hand hygiene when indicated during 2 meal services. Findings included .<Undated/expired/uncovered food> During an initial tour of the kitchen on 03/16/2026 at 9:00 AM, the dry storage area contained the following food items that were undated: 10-pound cans of beans, peaches, pineapples, and pears; cornbread mix; jalapeno peppers; box of dry gravy mix; and a box of opened powdered potatoes. The following foods were expired: marshmallow cream topping, a case of green peppercorns, scalloped potatoes, a bag of chopped peanuts, a bag of hazelnuts, and a bag of dry pasta. Observation of refrigerator 1 found two containers of lettuce that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive infection prevention program designed to reduce the risk of infections for 1 of 1 residents (Resident 40). These failures placed residents, staff and students at risk of acquiring infections and unintended health consequences.Findings included.<Annual Review of Infection Prevention and Control Policies> Infection Prevention and Control policies were not reviewed annually. During the Entrance Conference conducted on 03/16/2026 at 9:06 AM, policies regarding the Infection Prevention and Control program were requested. The following policies were provided in addition to others requested during the survey: -Infection Prevention and Control, revised 06/19/2024 -Immunizations-Influenza and Pneumococcal Vaccines, updated 11/08/2022 -Antibiotic Stewardship Policy, dated 09/01/2024 -TB Testing Policy and Procedure, revised 05/10/2023 -Powered Air Purifying Respirator Usage, approval date 11/03/2020 During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement bowel protocols for 3 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 3, 4 and 13) reviewed for constipation. This failure put the residents at risk of discomfort and more serious health consequences.Findings included.The facility policy titled, Constipation Management reviewed December 2024, documented staff were to check a resident's bowel record every shift and implement the following interventions if appropriate:1) Laxloaf (a medication made at the facility to treat constipation) daily as needed,2) Milk of Magnesia (MOM- used to treat occasional constipation) to be given on the evening shift of the second day with no bowel movement (BM) with results documented,3) Dulcolax suppository (stimulant laxative) to be given on night shift of the third day with no BM with results documented, and 4) notify the provider if no BM results by the fourth day.The policy instructed staff to document a bowel assessment, provider notification, and orders initiated.<Resident 3> The 06/04/2025 care plan for Resident 3 did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain a system of records for receipt and disposal of all controlled drugs (substances or medications that have a high potential for abuse, misuse and addiction) in sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation for 3 of 3 controlled medication emergency kits (e-kit) (e-kit 309, e-kit 314 & e-kit 315) reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed the residents at risk by the facility being unable to identify potential drug diversion.Findings included.Review of the policy titled Ordering and Receiving Controlled Medications dated January 2023 showed, controlled substances and medications classified as controlled substances were subject to special ordering, receipt, and record keeping requirements. Controlled medications were dispensed by the pharmacy in readily accountable quantities and containers designed for easy counting of contents. The medications were to be logged in a narcotic book with the following information: the resident's name, prescription number, medication name,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were addressed timely for 4 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 4, 13, 17 and 27) reviewed for pharmacy monthly medication reviews. This failure placed the residents at risk for medication side effects or unintended health consequences. Findings included.Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Monitoring: Medication Regimen Review and Reporting dated January 2024 showed medical records were reviewed to prevent, identify, report, and resolve medication-related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities. The consultant pharmacist was to review the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly to appropriately monitor the medication regimen and ensure the medications each resident received were clinically indicated. The findings were communicated to the director of nursing or designee and the medical director. The facility was to follow up on the recommendations to verify that appropriate action was taken. Recommendations were to be acted on within 30 calendar days. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to obtain informed consent for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 27) reviewed for resident rights. This failure resulted in position change alarms (a sensor pad the resident sits on that emits an audible alarm when the resident moves in certain ways) being implemented without consent from the resident and/or the resident representative.Findings included.A care plan dated 08/08/2025, showed Resident 27 was at risk for falls and instructed staff to ensure the bed was in the lowest position, a fall mat was at the bedside, appropriate non-skid footwear was worn, and position change alarms were to be used in the bed and chair.Review of Resident 27's medical record showed that prior to use, on 8/8/25, no consent that included potential risks versus benefits for the use of the position change alarms was obtained from the resident and/or their representative. According to the 02/02/2026 quarterly assessment, Resident 27 had diagnoses that included repeat falls and depression. The assessment further showed Resident 27…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) as care planned and needed for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 17 and 29), reviewed for ADLs. This failure contributed to Resident 17 not being provided with adaptive equipment and assistance at meals and Resident 29 not being provided basic hygiene. This failure placed residents at risk of hunger, lack of dignity and diminished quality of life.Findings included.<Resident 17> On 07/07/2025, the care plan documented Resident 17 required set up and clean up assistance at meals. Staff were instructed to add foam handles to the eating utensils. The 07/07/2025 nutrition care plan instructed staff to provide Resident 17 fluids in a Kennedy cup (a specialized durable plastic mug designed for people with tremors, arthritis, or limited mobility) with a straw, provide finger foods, encourage and remind the resident to eat their meal, and offer a meal supplement twice daily. On 01/05/2026 the care plan was updated for staff to provide 1:1 extensive assistance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions, develop treatment goals and notify the appropriate parties after a resident developed a pressure ulcer for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 25) reviewed for pressure ulcers. This failure placed the resident at risk for further deterioration of their skin, unintended health consequences and decreased quality of life.Findings included .Edsberg, L. E., Black, J. M., [NAME], M., [NAME], L., [NAME], L., & Sieggreen, M. (2016). Revised National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel Pressure Injury Staging System; Journal of Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, 43(6), 585-597 retrieved 10/21/2024 from https://npiap.com/page/PressureInjuryStages defined a stage 2 pressure injury as a partial-thickness skin loss, the wound bed is pink or red, moist and may also present as an intact or ruptured serum-filled blister.The 02/24/2026 quarterly assessment documented Resident 25 had diagnoses that included Parkinsons disease (a progressive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain oxygen equipment in a clean and sanitary manner for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents13 and 30) and failed to administer oxygen per provider orders for 1 of 3 sample residents (Resident 30), reviewed for respiratory care. This failure placed residents at risk of potential medical complications, potential respiratory infections, and diminished quality of life.Findings included.The facility provided an Oxygen Concentrator instruction guide that included care instructions for cleaning. The filter door and vents were to be inspected periodically and wiped with a dry or damp cloth every seven days and as needed to remove dust. <Resident 13> Review of the 05/15/2024 heart failure care plan showed Resident 13 received oxygen therapy and instructed staff to change the oxygen tubing per facility protocol. No documentation was found to show how the oxygen equipment was to be maintained. Review of providers orders showed an active 11/14/2024 order for Resident 13 to be administered oxygen to maintain their oxygen levels…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transcribe provider orders correctly and administer medications as intended by the provider for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 31), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk of adverse side effects and unnecessary medications. Findings included .According to the 01/19/2026 admission assessment, Resident 31 was admitted with diagnoses to include a mental health disorder. The resident was able to make their needs known.Review of the 01/05/2026 admission orders showed the resident took Seroquel (chemical substances that affect brain function, altering mood, thoughts, behavior, or perception to treat mental health conditions) 25 milligrams (mg) once a day.Resident 31's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for January 2026 and February 2026 showed an order was entered on 01/05/2026 for Seroquel 25 mg once a day, give .5 mg in the evening. The MAR showed the resident received a 1/2 tablet (12.5 mg) of Seroquel from 01/05/2026 through 02/09/2026 every evening.Review of a 02/09/2026 facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 36 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the requirements to protect resident rights in an arbitration agreement for 2 of 4 sample residents (Residents 13 and 14) reviewed for arbitration. This failure placed residents at risk of losing legal protection, forfeiture (loss or giving up of something) of the right to a jury or court, lack of understanding of the legal document signed, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the admission and Discharge report provided by the facility on 03/17/2026 included a handwritten statement across the top that documented all admissions signed arbitration agreements (a procedure used to settle a dispute using an independent person mutually agreed upon by both parties) upon campus move in. The report showed the skilled nursing facility had 147 admissions between 01/06/2025 and 03/16/2026.Review of campus residency agreement showed the facility operated as part of a continuing care community. As part of the community, residents were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a resident's call light system in a functional manner for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 25) reviewed for environmental concerns. This failure placed all facility residents at risk of potentially avoidable accidents, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life.Findings included.The 02/04/2026 quarterly assessment documented Resident 25 had diagnoses that included Parkinsons disease (a progressive disorder that affected movement), dementia, and weakness. Resident 25 required set up assistance to total assistance from staff to perform activities of daily living (ADLs). Resident 25 had severe cognitive impairment and was able to make their needs known. The 11/19/2020 care plan documented Resident 25 was at risk for falls related to Parkinsons, poor balance, dementia, vision impairments and a history of falls. Staff were instructed to keep Resident 25's call light in reach at all times and remind the resident to use their call light to request assistance.In an observation on 03/17/2026 at 2:19 PM, Resident 25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure wheelchairs were maintained in a clean manner for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 25 and 29) reviewed for physical environment. This failure placed residents at risk of potentially avoidable accidents, lack of dignity and diminished quality of life.Findings included .<Resident 25>The 02/24/2026 quarterly assessment documented Resident 25 had diagnoses that included Parkinsons disease (a progressive disorder that affected movement), dementia and weakness. The resident had severe cognitive impairments and required partial to total assistance with activities of daily living.The revised care plan dated 01/28/2026 documented Resident 25 was wheelchair bound and was dependent on staff for locomotion.In an observation on 03/16/2026 at 1:08 PM, Resident 25 was sitting in their wheelchair in their room. The wheelchair was unclean with food debris on the back of the wheelchair, sides and side bars, and the seat cushion. The right arm of the wheelchair was torn. Similar observations of the wheelchair being unclean with food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff performed the required hand hygiene and wore hair coverings during food preparation and meal service for 2 of 2 dining rooms observed. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the staff discarded expired foods, labeled food items, monitored the temperatures of foods being served, and were competent on preparation of thickened liquids. This failure placed the residents at risk for foodborne illnesses and aspiration (accidental inhalation of liquid into the lungs). Findings included . <North Dining Room> An observation of meal services in the North Dining Room on 12/03/2024 at 11:14 AM showed, Staff G, Nursing Assistant (NA), serving meals from the steam table for other staff to deliver to the residents in the North Dining Room. Staff G wore no hair covering throughout the entire meal service period observation. An unidentified aide was observed to touch the table where Resident 27 was seated at.The aide brought a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 15 and 19) reviewed for unnecessary medications and 1 supplemental resident (Resident 17). Failure to ensure complete informed consents for psychotropics (drugs that affect a person's mental state), placed the residents at risk of not having their needs met. Findings included . <Resident 15> Review of Resident 15's November 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed the staff administered Nuplazid (an antipsychotic) daily, Trazodone (an antidepressant) at bedtime, and citalopram (an antidepressant) daily. Review of 05/02/2023 consents for Trazodone and Nuplazid showed the staff did not identify the drug class categories the psychotropics belonged to. Additionally, the consent for Nuplazid did not show the symptoms the medication was prescribed for and instead showed, of psychosis. <Resident 17> Review of Resident 17's November 2024 MAR showed the staff administered citalopram daily, Nuplazid daily, buspirone (an antianxiety agent) twice a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-12-09 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow an established Antibiotic Stewardship Program (ASP) to promote the appropriate use of antibiotics (ABX) and reduce the risk of unnecessary ABX use for 2 of 2 months of infection control records reviewed. This failure increased resident risk for development of multidrug organisms (germs that are resistant to many ABX) and adverse outcomes associated with the inappropriate/unnecessary use of ABX. Findings included . Review of a 09/01/2024 policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship Policy showed its purpose was to develop ABX use protocols and a system to monitor their use. The policy showed the facility would assess residents for infections using the McGeer Criteria (a nationally recognized standard for defining infections), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, and their local health jurisdiction. The policy showed that when residents were placed on ABX empirically (the initial antibiotic selected in the absence of definitive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician and the resident representative of a change in condition experienced by 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 15) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk for delayed decisions for treatment by the legal representative and the physician/practitioner. Findings included . Review of an 08/08/2024 quarterly assessment showed Resident 15 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medically complex conditions, to include high blood pressure (BP) and arrhythmia (an irregular heartbeat). This assessment showed Resident 15 had severe cognitive impairment. The medical record showed Resident 15 had an appointed power of attorney (POA) for healthcare. According to the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NIH), a normal BP is less than 120 systolic (the top number in a BP reading) pressure and less than 80 diastolic (the lower number in a BP reading) pressure. The NIH defined a hypertensive crisis (a medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required beneficiary notices for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1 and 83) reviewed for required notices and associated choices related to Medicare services ending. This failure placed the residents at risk of not being fully informed of the potential cost of continued services. Findings included . Review of the Skilled Nursing Facility (SNF) Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) form showed it provided information to Medicare beneficiaries so that they could decide if they wished to continue receiving the skilled services that might not be paid for by Medicare and assume financial responsibility. The form was required when a resident had skilled benefit days remaining, was being discharged from Medicare Part A services, and continued living in the facility. <Resident 83> Review of a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) form showed Resident 83's last day of Medicare Part A services ended on 08/22/2024. The resident discharged from the facility on 09/04/2024. Record review showed no documentation the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their Abuse and Neglect Prohibition Policies and Procedures to include, not reporting or investigating elopement episodes and the discovery of a skin injury for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 30) reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed the resident at risk for repeated elopement and precluded the state agency (SA) from being aware of and investigating the circumstances surrounding the resident's elopements and skin injury. Findings included . Review of a 2019 facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation showed, the facility provided protections for the health, welfare and rights of each resident by developing and implementing written policies and procedures that prohibited and prevented abuse, neglect, exploitation and misappropriation of resident property. The policy showed the facility completed an immediate investigation when suspicion of or actual abuse, neglect or exploitation occurred. The policy showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medical record contained documentation of a transfer to the hospital, or that the receiving hospital had received information of the resident's condition, for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 24 and 22), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the resident at risk for a delay in treatment and unmet care needs. Findings included . Per the 10/31/2024 admission assessment, Resident 24 had diagnoses which included high blood pressure, heart failure and thrombocytopenia (abnormally low platelets in the blood). A 11/26/2024 progress note showed the resident was assessed, due to complaints of pain. Resident 24 was weak, lethargic and had a blood pressure of 76/52. The resident's family member was notified, and the resident was sent to the hospital. A review of Resident 24's record showed no order was obtained to send the resident to the hospital or that information had been communicated to the receiving hospital. A 12/04/2024…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman received written notification of a hospital transfer, for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 24 and 22), reviewed for hospitalization/discharge. This failure placed the resident at risk of not having access to additional advocacy services from the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Findings included . The 11/26/2024 discharge assessment documented Resident 24 was cognitively intact to make decisions regarding their care and had diagnoses which included heart failure, pneumonia (an infection that inflames air sacs in one or both lungs) and thrombocytopenia (abnormally low platelets in the blood). Review of Resident 24's record showed an 11/26/2024 nursing progress note which documented the resident had experienced pain, was lethargic and had a low blood pressure. Additional record review found no documentation that showed the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman had been notified of the resident's transfer to the hospital. A 12/04/2024 progress note showed the resident had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed-hold notice, a notice that informed the resident of their right to pay the facility to hold their room/bed while they were hospitalized , to the resident and/or their representative at the time of discharge, or within 24 hours of transfer to the hospital, for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 24 and 22), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk for a lack of knowledge regarding the right to a bed-hold, while they were hospitalized . Findings included Per the 10/31/2024 admission assessment, Resident 24 had diagnoses which included high blood pressure, heart failure, thrombocytopenia (abnormally low platelets in the blood), was cognitively intact and able to make decisions regarding their care. Review of Resident 24's record showed an 11/26/2024 nursing progress note which documented the resident had experienced pain, was lethargic and had a low blood pressure. The resident was assessed and was sent to the hospital for evaluation. Additional record review found no documentation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive person-centered care plans to address all aspects of care for 4 of 16 sampled residents (Resident 15, 19, 24 and 8) whose care plans were reviewed. Failure to address the individualized needs of each resident placed them at risk for inadequate care and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 15> Review of an 08/08/2024 quarterly assessment showed Resident 15 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medically complex conditions, to include high blood pressure (BP) and arrhythmia (an irregular heartbeat). Review of the November 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed the staff administered the medications amlodipine for high BP since 05/15/2024, hydrochlorothiazide for both high BP and edema (fluid retention) since 10/23/2024, and an as needed order for Hydralazine every six hours since 02/28/2024, if the staff assessed Resident 15's systolic (the top number in a BP reading) BP was greater…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a physician order for the treatment of elevated blood pressures for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 15) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk for a negative outcome from a high blood pressure. Findings included . Review of an 08/08/2024 quarterly assessment showed Resident 15 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medically complex conditions, to include high blood pressure (BP) and arrhythmia (an irregular heartbeat). Review of the November 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) showed an as needed order for Hydralazine every 6 hours since 02/28/2024, if the staff assessed Resident 15's systolic (the top number in a BP reading) BP was greater than 160. Review of Resident 15's medical record showed the staff obtained multiple readings with a systolic BP above 160 (10/04/2024, 10/06/2024, 10/08/2024, 10/24/2024, 10/25/2024, 10/26/2024, 11/05/2024, 11/09/2024, 11/12/2024, 11/24/2024, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide grooming for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 25), reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). This failure placed the resident at risk for not being groomed according to their preferences, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the 10/18/2024 quarterly assessment, Resident 25 was cognitively impaired and needed partial to moderate assistance from staff for ADL's, such as personal hygiene. Per the 04/11/2024 care plan, Resident 25 needed assistance with personal hygiene. Review of the personal hygiene task from 11/10/2024 through 12/13/2024 documented Resident 30 had their facial hair removed on 11/10/2024, 11/17/2024, 11/22/2024 and 12/08/2024 and had not refused cares. In an observation on 12/03/2024 at 9:11 AM, Resident 25 was sitting in their wheelchair and had hair on their chin that was approximately a centimeter long. Subsequent observations of Resident 25 with hair on their chin were made on 12/04/2024 at 07:38 AM, 10:25 AM, and 2:33 PM,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up on a resident's request to change their code status (level of intervention a resident chooses if their heart or breathing stops) for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 17) reviewed for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR, the act of performing chest compressions and providing breaths to mimic heartbeat and breathing). This failure placed Resident 17 at risk to have CPR initiated when their legal representative requested to change their code status to No CPR. Findings included . Review of a [DATE] quarterly assessment showed Resident 17 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with medically complex conditions. This assessment showed Resident 17 had severe cognitive impairment and the family participated in the completion of this assessment. Review of a [DATE] progress note showed the facility held a care conference for Resident 17. Present in the care conference were several members of the facility and the resident's family, to include their Power of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the staff implemented the bowel protocol for the management of constipation for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 14, 28, and 30) reviewed for unnecessary medications and monitor non-pressure injury and a fall with injury for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 30) reviewed for accidents. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet needs and complications from constipation and injuries. Findings included . According to the Bowel Protocol policy, dated 04/22/2019 (reviewed on 12/06/2024, staff was to initiate the following procedures on a regular basis for the resident to ensure adequate function and/or need for intervention: 1. Give Lax Loaf (type of laxative given by mouth) daily as needed 2. Give Milk of Magnesia (MOM, type of laxative given by mouth) on the evening of the second day if no bowel movement (BM). 3. Administer Dulcolax (Bisacodyl, a suppository laxative inserted rectally) on the night shift of the third day if no BM. <Resident 14> Per the 08/27/2024 quarterly assessment, Resident 14 had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess the need for restorative services (a program available in nursing homes that helps residents maintain any progress they've made during therapy treatments or enables them to function at their highest capacity), for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 7), reviewed for range of motion. This failure placed the resident at risk for a further decline in range of motion, due to limitations in their lower extremities and unmet care needs. Findings included . A 10/20/2024 significant change assessment documented Resident 7 had diagnoses including dementia and abnormalities of gait and mobility (the way a person walks and moves around). Per the assessment, the resident had impaired range of motion to their lower extremities, needed substantial to total assistance to complete activities of daily living (ADL), and received physical and occupational therapy. A 10/15/2024 physical therapy evaluation showed Resident 7 was hospitalized from [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision during a coughing episode for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 183) reviewed for supervision. This failure placed Resident 183 at risk for choking and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Per the 11/26/2024 admission assessment, Resident 183 had diagnoses including dementia and a stroke. The resident had severe cognitive impairments and needed total assistance with eating. The 11/20/2024 physician's order prescribed Resident 183 a mechanical soft diet (soft, easily chewable foods designed for people who have difficulty swallowing or chewing) with nectar thick liquids. The 12/03/2024 care plan documented Resident 183 had difficulties swallowing and received an altered textured diet and required one to one feeding assistance. The resident needed to sit upright to consume food and fluids and required small sips and to swallow between bites. The staff were instructed to remind the resident to tuck their chin to swallow. During an observation on 12/05/2024 at 11:20 AM, Staff U, Nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a system to ensure the availability of a physician to timely coordinate the procurement of controlled substances during afterhours for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 31) reviewed for closed records. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet needs at end of life. Findings included . Review of a 01/21/2021 contract between a physician services group and the facility showed that if the designated physician was unable to provide services due to illness, disability, vacation or any other reason, then the group designated a replacement group physician to provide the services. This policy also showed the Medical Director aided in arranging for continuous physician coverage for medical emergencies, developed procedures for emergency treatment of residents, and became the primary physician in the absence of the resident's primary physician unless the resident or physician designated the responsibility to other physicians. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sleep medications were consistently monitored for 1 of 5 sampled resident (Resident 183) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents at risk for potential adverse side effects and medical conditions. Findings included . Per the 11/26/2024 admission assessment, Resident 183 had diagnoses which included dementia and weakness. Review of the Active Order Report documented the physician prescribed a medication for sleep (Melatonin) on 11/20/2024 to be given every day at bedtime. The November 2024 and December 2024 medication administration records documented the resident received the Melatonin every night at bedtime. In an interview on 12/09/2024 at 11:47 AM, Staff K, Licensed Practical Nurse, stated residents who received Melatonin needed a sleep monitor to ensure the medication was effective. During an interview on 12/09/2024 at 12:23 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing, confirmed the resident should have had a sleep monitor in place to ensure the medication was effective. Reference (WAC):…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain temperatures to ensure medications were properly stored. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving compromised or ineffective medication. Findings included . During an observation of the medication room on 12/06/2024 at 10:40 AM, with Staff D, Registered Nurse, the refrigerator in the medication room contained a vial of Tubersol (medication injected under the skin to determine exposure to Tuberculosis) and respiratory synticial virus vaccines (vaccine used to treat a severe respiratory infection). Review of the refrigerator temperature logs for September 2024, October 2024 and November 2024 showed the temperatures were not monitored consistently as required. The temperatures were monitored 14 days in September, 16 days in October and 16 days in November. The medication room did not have a thermometer to monitor the temperature the medications were stored at. In an interview on 12/06/2024 at 11:03 AM, Staff B, Director of Nursing, stated the temperature of the refrigerator should have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolated
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nursing staff had the required qualifications (current Washington State Food Worker Cards) for 3 nursing staff (Staff N, AA, BB). This failed practice had the potential risk for unsafe food handling practices and placed all residents at risk for developing foodborne illness. Findings included . During an observation on 12/03/2024 at 11:14 AM, Staff G, Nursing Assistant, served meals from the steam table in the north dining room. Staff G wore no hair covering throughout the entire meal service observation. In an interview on 12/06/2024 at 10:54 AM, Staff Z, Cook, stated nursing assistants served food from the steam table when the dietary staff was unavailable. On 12/06/2024, a copy of dietary and nursing staff's current Washington State Food Worker cards were requested, and none were provided. Review of dietary cards on 12/09/2024 at 4:32 PM showed the following nursing assistants: Staff N (expired on 11/22/2024), Staff BB (expired on 10/09/2024), and Staff CC (no information). Reference WAC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 183) reviewed for unnecessary medications, received information on and were offered the recommended vaccinations for pneumonia based on the current recommendations from the Centers for Disease and Control Prevention.This failure placed the resident at risk for contracting pneumonia with its associated complications of infection. Findings included . Review of a 10/19/2022 facility policy titled Immunizations showed the facility offered the pneumococcal (a bacteria) series vaccines unless medically contraindicated, to all residents upon admission. The pneumococcal vaccine protected against the bacteria which could cause many illnesses, including pneumonia, meningitis (a serious infection that causes inflammation of the membranes that protect the brain and spinal cord), sepsis (a life-threatening medical emergency that occurs when the body has an extreme response to an infection), and ear and sinus infections. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-16 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect was reported to the State Survey Agency, as required, for residents residing on the South Hall (Resident 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Failure to report an allegation of neglect placed all residents at risk for mistreatment and poor quality of life. Findings included . Per the facility policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation dated 2019, Section V11. Reporting/Response states the facility was to report all alleged violations to the Administrator, State Agency, Adult Protective Services and all other required agencies within specified timeframe: Immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse. The Administrator will follow up with government agencies, during business hours, to confirm the initial report was received. A report from a collateral contact dated 10/02/2023 documented neglect had occurred for residents 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen and 1 of 2 dining rooms (South dining room). Failure to securely close opened bags of food to protect from exposure to contaminants, label foods with dates they were opened or discard dates, and discard expired food, placed all residents at risk for food-borne illness. Findings included . On 07/25/2023 at 9:00 AM, during a tour of the kitchen with Staff N, Executive Chef, the following observations were made: Produce Refrigerator: An opened gallon of Asian Sesame Dressing was nearly empty. There was no date that showed when it was opened or should have been discarded. It was past the labeled manufacturer expiration date. Dairy Refrigerator: An opened bag of Pizza Blend shredded cheese. There was no date that showed when it was opened or should have been discarded. The top was unsecured and was gaping open. Dry Storage Room: 1. One opened large bulk bag of dry milk. The top was rolled down and not secured with a clamp. There was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-08-03 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure monitoring of potential side effects related to the use of psychotropic medication (drug taken to exert an effect on the chemical makeup of the brain and nervous system) for 7 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 22, 31, 29, 15, 12, 18, and 1) reviewed for unnecessary medication use. The facility's failure to monitor side effects related to use of psychotropic medication placed the residents at risk for adverse side effects and medical complications. Findings included . <Resident 22> Review of 05/06/2023 admission assessment showed Resident 22 admitted to the facility in November of 2022, and had diagnoses which included anxiety and insomnia. Per review of the physician's orders, Resident 22 had orders for three different psychotropic medications used to treat anxiety, psychosis and insomnia Resident 22's care plan showed interventions were implemented on 11/15/2022 related to the use of psychotropic medications, and due to the risk for changes in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Reisdent 23), reviewed for environment. This failure placed Resident 23 at risk for possible illness from unclean equipment, a lack of dignity, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 23 had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions). A 07/13/2023 assessment showed Resident 23 was severely cognitively impaired, and required extensive to total assistance for activities of daily living. Review of a 05/04/2023 comprehensive care plan showed Resident 23 received finger foods to help maintain independence with eating, preferred to eat their meals in their room, and was at risk for falls. Care plan interventions were to use an air mattress with bolsters (a soft cushion that surrounded the edge of the bed to promote safety). On 07/27/2023 at 8:47 AM, Resident 23 was observed in their room lying on an air mattress. The air mattress was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a comprehensive assessment for a significant change in condition within 14 days as required for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for Hospice Services. This failure placed the resident at risk for decreased quality of care and implementing standard disease-related clinical interventions. Findings included . A review of the records showed Resident 1 was admitted on [DATE]. Further review showed comprehensive admission assessment was completed on 04/21/2023 with diagnoses including dementia and frequent pain. Resident 1 was placed on Hospice Services on 07/13/2023 which required the completion of a comprehensive assessment related to the significant change of Hospice Services placement. As of 08/02/2023 (day 20 after Hospice Services placement), the following three comprehensive assessments were noted in the record review: an entry assessment dated [DATE], an admission assessment dated [DATE], and an in progress comprehensive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY AMENDED Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services for 1 of 2 Sampled residents (Resident 34) reviewed for urinary tract care. This failure placed the resident at risk for delayed identification and interventions for changes in the medical conditions. Findings included . Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) records showed Resident 34 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of medical records showed Resident 34's diagnoses included Sepsis due to Enterococcus (the body's extreme response to an infection), Urinary tract infection, and retention of urine. Review of providers orders showed on 06/10/2023 an order by a urologist (medical doctor specializing in conditions that affect the urinary tract) to change the urine catheter every month. Review of the medication administration records and treatment administration records for July 2023 showed that the catheter was changed on 07/09/2023 and 07/10/2023. On 07/28/2023 at 10:48…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents consistently received interventions to prevent further falls for 1 of 3 sample residents (Resident 22), reviewed for falls. These failures placed the residents at risk for injury from falling. Findings included . According to the 05/06/2023 admission assessment, Resident 22 had cognitive impairment and anxiety. The assessment also showed they required physical assistance for activities of daily living such as transferring, bed mobility, and toilet use. Per the assessment, the resident was not steady to move from a seated to standing position, transfer between surfaces, or move on and off of the toilet, and was only able to stabilize during those activities with assistance. According to Resident 22's care plan, interventions dated 11/04/2022 included: bed in lowest position, call light within reach, pharmacy consult to evaluate medications, provide one-on-one activity if bedbound, therapy consult for strength and mobility, and an alarm on bed and chair. Intervention dated 05/03/2023: encourage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide dialysis services consistent with professional standards related to not monitoring fluid restriction, bruit and thrill (bruit is a sound which indicates flow of blood through the vessels, thrill is felt on the overlying skin as a vibration and also indicates blood flow) and no direction to staff on which arm was needed to obtain a blood pressure for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 5), reviewed for dialysis (a procedure that removes waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stopped working properly) services. This failure placed the residents for risk of medical condition complications and diminsihed quality of care. Findings included . The 06/26/2023 admission assessment showed Resident 5 had cognitive impairments, but was able to make their needs known, had medically complex conditions, and diagnoses which included kidney disease. In addition, the assessment showed the resident received dialysis. Review of the physician's orders showed Resident 5 went to dialysis on Tuesdays,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0710 — isolated
    Obtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician personally approved, in writing, a recommendation that an individual be admitted to the facility, for 2 of 3 (Residents 34 and 22) sampled residents reviewed for physician services. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . <RESIDENT 34> Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) records showed Resident 34 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of medical records and documents provided by the facility showed no indication that any physician approved, in writing, Resident 34's admission orders. In an interview on 08/02/2023 at 3:24 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing, confirmed that there was no written physician approval for Resident 34. <Resident 22> Review of MDS records showed Resident 22 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of medical records and documents provided by the facility showed no indication that any physician approved, in writing, Resident 22's admission…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0712 — isolated
    Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an initial comprehensive visit was done by physician after admission as required, for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 34), reviewed for physician visits. This failure placed the resident at risk for delayed identification and treatment of medical needs. Findings included . Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) records revealed Resident 34 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of provider visit showed that Resident 34 was seen on 04/24/2023 and 05/03/2023 by Staff G, Physician Assistant. Further review showed that the first visit by Staff H, Physician, was done on 06/01/2023. In an interview on 08/02/2023 at 11:00 AM, Staff G confirmed that there was no documentation that Staff H, Physician, visited Resident 34 before 06/01/2023 in the medical records. Reference: (WAC) 388-97-1260 (6)

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 1 medication rooms had the narcotic box affixed that was placed in the refrigerator, as required. This failure placed unintended access by others to drugs because they were not locked up and/or unmovable. Findings included . In an observation on 07/31/2023 at 8:12 AM, Staff F, Registered Nurse, provided access to the medication room to the surveyor. The refrigerator was locked, and there was no locked box that was permanently affixed inside the refrigerator as to prevent drug diversion. The refrigerator contained Ativan (medication used to treat anxiety), Haldol (medication used to treat agitation), Hydromorphone (medication used to treat pain), and Ativan/haloperidol suppositories (medication used to treat agitation). During an interview on 08/03/2023 at 1:28 PM Staff B, Director of Nursing, stated they were unaware they needed to have a locked narcotic box that was permanently affixed inside the refrigerator. Reference WAC: 388-97-1300(2), 2340

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene and glove changes were performed when providing care, for 1 of 2 (Resident 15) sampled residents for infection prevention and control. These failures placed the residents at risk for infections and a diminished quality of life. Findings included Review of Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) records showed Resident 15 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of Resident 15's medical records showed that Resident 15 had four urinary tract infections (12/14/2022, 03/02/2023, 04/21/2023, and 07/21/2023). Further review showed that bacteria causing the urinary tract infection included Enterococcus Faecalis and Escherichia coli (most common tested fecal bacteria) During an observation on 07/28/2023 at 10:47 AM, staff L, Nursing Assistant (NA) and staff M, NA, provided peri care (cleaning the private areas of a patient) to Resident 15. Resident 15 was standing during the care. Staff M did not change gloves and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
COLLETTE, STEPHENIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODYsince 11/09/2020
BAFUS, CHRISIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2016
BARBER, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
BLOCK, JONELLIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017
BORNHOFT, ELIZABETHIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2016
CONATY, PATRICIAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
DE IMUS, CARLOSIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 10/02/2024
DEMOTT, ANDREWIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2018
DENHOLM, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 05/01/2024
DROPPERS, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
ITSKOS, DEMITRIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 03/30/1981
JOHNSON, TOMIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
KOSZCZEWSKI, CATHERINEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
MIRANDA, SHEILAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2021
THOMAS, PATRICKIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 02/01/2025
WELLS, CHARLESIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2024
WETMORE, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2022
GORTON, ANDREWIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 02/13/2012
MAXWELL, JAMESIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2024
INPATIENT CONSULTANTS OF CALIFORNIA INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/09/2025
BISHOP, LEIGHIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
DEBOISE, DANIELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2015
LONG, DEBRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/27/1997

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$24.8M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-30.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 0%Medicare 10%Other / private 90%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$2,531per resident / day
operating cost
$76,947per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$1,934per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

CMS lists this home as Medicare-certified only — it is not Medicaid-certified, so it generally cannot accept Medicaid as payment for a long-term stay. That makes it one of roughly 545 homes nationally where a Medicaid-funded placement is not an option. If you expect to rely on Medicaid, ask the home directly before you tour, and see the Washington Medicaid page for homes that do.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505033. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next