Spokane Veterans Home
222 East Fifth, Spokane, WA 99202 · Government - State · 100 certified beds · (509) 344-5770 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (35% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Feb 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 4 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 5 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 24.5% | 14.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.1% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 1.0% | 0.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.1% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.1% | 17.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.5% | 2.6% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.0% | 17.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 10.1% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 93.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.4% | 4.3% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 14.0% | 22.5% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.2% | 15.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.0% | 1.3% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 94.4% | 82.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 0.34 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.55 | 1.52 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.01 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 100 beds and averages 97.4 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 3 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.02 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.39 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.61 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.63 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.17 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.50 to 1.11 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 35% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 36 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2022-12-08 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 1) reviewed for medication administration received a provider ordered increased dose of their diuretic medication (rids the body of excess fluid). This resulted in harm as Resident 1's edema increased during the time they missed the ordered increase in medication and may have contributed to the need for emergency care due to complications from heart disease. Resident 1 developed increased lower leg edema (swelling), skin breakdown of their right calf, and increased shortness of breath, requiring further evaluation in the emergency department. This failure placed residents at risk for deterioration of their chronic health conditions, physical distress and discomfort, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Per the record which included the resident's current diagnoses list as of November 2022, Resident 1 had diagnoses including obesity, cardiomyopathy and heart failure (both diseases…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-20 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure narcotic medication was administered to the resident for which it had been prescribed, and not diverted from use, for 1 of 3 sample residents (Resident 1) reviewed for medication administration. This incident constituted a Past-Non-Compliance (the facility was not in compliance at the time the incident occurred; however, there was sufficient evidence that the facility corrected the non-compliance after it was identified). The facility immediately and thoroughly investigated, made appropriate notifications, took appropriate safety actions to ensure resident safety. Education of all nursing staff on the proper administration and documentation for narcotic medications was completed by 07/11/2025. The facility was notified of the past non-compliance on 02/20/2026.Findings included. Review of a facility investigation dated 06/29/2025 documented a clear pouch containing two pills was found on the floor at the second-floor nurse's station by Staff A, Administrator, on the morning of 06/26/2025 at 7:00 AM. The medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, safe and homelike environment for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 92, 58 and 35), reviewed for environment. Specifically, Resident 92's wall in their room was in disrepair and had a screw that protruded out of the wall, and Resident 58 and 32's walls were in disrepair. These failures placed all residents at risk for avoidable injuries and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 35> An observation on 03/18/2025 at 9:09 AM showed an approximately 2 feet by 2 feet section of peeled, scraped paint on the wall, right next to the Resident 35's bed. The curved paint scrapes appeared to be from the bed's upper rail scraping the wall, when it was swung up or down. Similar observations of the wall damage were made on 03/19/2025 at 2:06 PM, 03/20/2025 at 2:58 PM and 03/24/2025 at 9:45 AM. On these subsequent observations, a cloth band-aide was observed stuck to the wall, over one of the gouges. <Resident 58> An observation on 03/18/2025 at 9:43 AM showed gouges in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-03-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents or their representatives were provided the opportunity to participate in care planning for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 29 and 35) whose medical records were reviewed for care planning. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . A revised 04/2016 facility policy titled Resident/Family Participation - Assessment/Care Plans documented the facility invited each resident and their family members to participate in the development of the resident assessment and care planning conference. The policy instructed the Social Services Director (SSD) or designee to maintain records that showed their efforts to invite the resident and family to the care planning conference, including refusal of participation. The policy showed the facility scheduled care conferences shortly after admission, quarterly, and at discharge to ensure resident needs and preferences were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. Failure to ensure expired foods were discarded for 1 of 3 refrigerators, 1 of 1 dry storage areas, opened dates were placed on food items in the refrigerator and freezer, appropriate hair coverings were worn, and hand hygiene was performed when indicated. The facility further failed to ensure the kitchen was cleaned and dishwasher temperatures were maintained at the appropriate temperatures. These failures placed residents at risk for food-borne illnesses and food served from unsanitary conditions. Findings included . <Expired/undated food> During an initial tour of the kitchen on 03/17/2025 at 08:41 AM, the dry storage area revealed 12 containers of grits that had expired on 02/04/2025, an opened box of spice mix cake that had no open or expiration date, and five bottles of honey that had expired on 12/01/2024. The refrigerator in the main kitchen contained a stock of celery that was brown and wilted, and a box of mushrooms that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolatedHonor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to promote and facilitate resident self-determination by honoring resident choices and/or refusals for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 94), reviewed for choices. This failure placed residents at risk of being unable to exercise their rights, not having their choices honored, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the 02/02/2025 admission assessment, Resident 94 was cognitively intact and able to clearly verbalize their needs. Review of provider orders showed an active 01/27/2025 order for Resident 94 to utilize a wheelchair (WC) and bed position change alarms to alert staff for the need of assistance. The order instructed staff to remove the alarm if signs of distress were observed and report to the Resident Care Manager (RCM) so the position change alarm could be removed from the care plan as needed. Review of the 01/27/2025 risk for fall care plan showed Resident 94 utilized a fall mat on the right side of the bed, automatic locking WC brakes, a scoop mattress (mattress with defined lip or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address required documentation for advance directives for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 49) reviewed for Advance Directives. This failure placed the resident at risk of losing their right to have their preferences/decisions regarding end-of-life care followed. Findings included . Review of a 02/10/2025 assessment showed Resident 49 admitted to the facility on [DATE]. This assessment showed the staff identified Resident 49 had moderately impaired cognition and, along with the family and significant other, participated in the assessment and goal setting of care. Review of a 09/28/2023 facility admission agreement showed it was signed by Resident 49 and a staff. Under the subject of Power of Attorney, Yes and No questions were asked to help the facility identify if the resident had a healthcare Power of Attorney (POA), advance directives, if copy of the advance directives were provided to the facility, and if they desired information and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement care plan interventions for aspiration precautions (measures taken to prevent food, liquid, or other substances from entering the lungs instead of the stomach) for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 81), reviewed for hospitalization. In addition, the facility failed to follow care planned interventions when providing cares for Resident 91. This failure placed residents at risk of aspiration, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 81> According to the 02/17/2025 quarterly assessment, Resident 81 had diagnoses that included gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD, condition where stomach acid and contents back up into the throat) and diabetes. The assessment documented Resident 81 required a mechanically altered therapeutic diet, was cognitively intact and was able to clearly verbalize their needs. Review of the 10/31/2024 hospital discharge summary showed Resident 81 was to receive antibiotics for aspiration pneumonia (lung infection that occurred…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to identify, evaluate and analyze risks, and implement safety interventions to reduce risks and hazards for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 95 and 2), reviewed for substance use disorder (SUD). In addition, the facility failed to monitor for injury and add interventions to the care plan after a fall was sustained, and failed to ensure a position change alarm was in working order for 2 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 13 and 92), reviewed for falls. These failures placed residents at risk of leaving the facility without staff knowledge, potentially avoidable accidents, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . The facility policy titled, Fall Management dated 01/01/2025 documented residents were to be placed on alert charting for further monitoring after a fall occurred. The fall would be reviewed and interventions would be added to the care plan as indicated. <Resident 95> According to the 02/03/2025 admission assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received appropriate treatments and services to restore bladder continence to the extent possible for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 69) reviewed for bowel and bladder incontinence. Failure to comprehensively assess the causes of incontinence and provide treatments and services to restore bladder function, placed the resident at risk for continued decline in urinary function, skin issues, and embarrassment. Findings included . The 01/01/2024 facility policy titled Incontinent Care cumented the facility provided incontinence care to keep the residents clean, dry and free from skin irritations, and to reduce the risk of urinary tract infections. The policy documented the facility assessed all residents upon admission for voiding patterns and the residents potential to participate in a bladder retraining program (helped the resident to begin to hold more urine for longer periods of time overcome bladder problems that included urgency, frequency and incontinence). Once the staff identified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received doses of Ozempic, a medication used to control blood sugar levels, as ordered, and failed to notify the provider timely after the omissions for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 36), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk of complications secondary to high blood sugar levels, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to the 01/06/2025 quarterly assessment, Resident 36 had diagnoses that included diabetes and stroke. Resident 36 received hypoglycemic (blood sugar lowering) medication including insulin (medication that lowered blood sugar levels) injections. Resident 36 was cognitively intact and able to clearly verbalize their needs. The 08/16/2019 diabetes care plan instructed staff to administer diabetes medications per provider orders and monitor for signs and/or symptoms of high or low blood sugar levels. On 04/20/2024 a provider order was given for Resident 36 to be administered an Ozempic injection once weekly on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 36 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at palatable temperatures for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 12) reviewed and 1 of 1 meal test trays sampled.This failure put residents at risk of decreased enjoyment of their meals, and possible reduced dietary intake. Findings inculded . According to the Washington State Food Handlers Guide Website, the Washington State Department of Health Safety and Licensing Division recommended that all potentially hazardous foods be held at a temperature of 41°F or below in commercial refrigerators and freezers. This included meats, fish, poultry, eggs, dairy products, cooked vegetables, cooked rice and pasta, cut melons, and other perishable items. All frozen foods were to be stored at 0°F or below. Hot food items were to be held at a temperature of 140°F or above. The 03/10/2025 quarterly assessment documented Resident 12 had diagnoses that included obesity, high blood pressure and diabetes. The assessment further documented the resident was cognitively intact and was able to make their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-25 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that consents for psychotropic medications (drugs that affected behavior, mood, thoughts or perception) were completed accurately for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 43) reviewed for unnecessary medications. Specifically, some consents were not documented as late entries, and two consents were not completed before the medication was resumed. Failure to ensure clinical records were accurate placed residents at risk of not having their needs met. Findings included . A quarterly assessment, dated 01/20/2025, documented Resident 43 had diagnoses of Parkinsons Disease (an illness that affected the part of the brain that controlled movement), depression and anxiety. The assessment further showed that they were alert and made their needs known. Resident 43's Medication Administration Record for March 2025, showed they were taking the following psychotropic medications, that required documented consents: 1) Quetiapine (a medication that treated symptoms such as delusions, hallucinations or paranoia) daily in the evening 2)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were followed during meal service to include performing hand hygiene (HH) when indicated. In addition, staff did not follow Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) when indicated for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 91), reviewed for infection control. These failures placed the residents at risk for the spread of infections, illnesses and unintended health consequences. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Hand Washing/Hand Hygiene revised March 2024, showed hand hygiene was the primary means of preventing the spread of infections. The policy further showed staff should perform hand hygiene before and after direct contact with residents, after contact with a resident's intact skin, after contact with objects in the immediate vicinity of a resident, before and after assisting a resident with a meal. Review of the facility policy titled, Enhanced Barrier Precautions revised March 2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-22 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely follow-up for resident representative reported concerns (grievances) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for grievances. This failure placed the resident at risk of having unresolved grievances and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the policy titled, Washington State Veterans Home Grievances, effective 08/01/2024, showed that residents had a right to make formal or informal concerns or grievances orally or in writing, and the facility would make efforts to provide a reasonable timeframe the resident or representative could expect a completed review of the grievance. Once the investigation was completed the facility would respond back to the resident or representative with any findings and steps the facility would take to resolve the concern, and the resident or representative's response to the investigation would be recorded on the grievance form. In an interview on 10/22/2024 at 1:11 PM a representative for Resident 1 stated they had several concerns with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement standards of care to prevent elopement (leaving a facility without notice or supervision) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 2), reviewed for accidents/supervision. This failure placed the resident at risk of injury, becoming lost, and/or exposure to the elements. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, WanderGuards, effective 02/06/2019, showed WanderGuards would be placed on residents identified to have a history of wandering and exit seeking. WanderGuards would be tested routinely to ensure they were working and all doors with WanderGuard monitors were to be checked monthly by maintenance to ensure they were working properly. The policy did not list any direction to staff on how to respond when a WanderGuard alarm sounded, and/or additional actions to take when an alarm sounded but no residents were found at the door/area of alarm. Review of the 08/26/2024 quarterly assessment showed Resident 2 had a diagnosis of dementia, was severely cognitively impaired, and required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-24 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of a significant change in condition for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 4), reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed the resident at risk of receipt of inadequate care and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the June 2024 progress notes showed on the evening of 06/20/2024, Resident 4 was transferred to the hospital due to a fracture to their foot. There was no documentation showing Resident 4's representative was notified of the transfer. Additional review showed the resident returned to their former residence (instead of the facility) after their hospitalization on 06/21/2024, where the resident was found by their representative with injuries from falls that occurred while the resident was alone. In an interview on 06/27/2024 at 4:48 PM a representative for Resident 4 stated they were not notified of the resident's transfer to the hospital and were surprised to find the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow up with a physician's order to advance a catheter, and obtain an order to increase the oxygen rate, for 1 of 3 sampled residents (1) reviewed for neglect. This failure placed the resident at risk for potential deterioration in their medical condition and unmet care needs. Findings included . According to the 03/16/2022 admission assessment, Resident 1 had diagnoses which included benign prostatic hyperplasia (prostate gland enlargement that can cause difficulty with urination), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe) and was able to make their needs known. The assessment also documented the resident required supplemental oxygen. A progress note dated 08/01/2022, by the urology clinic, documented Resident 1's urinary catheter was positioned in their prostate and was not placed fully into the bladder. The clinic called the facility and instructed Staff B, Registered Nurse, to advance the catheter into the bladder. A progress note dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure catheter care was provided in a dignified manner for 1 of 1 sampled residents (31), reviewed for use and care of a urinary catheter (a flexible tube that passes through the urethra and into the bladder to drain urine). This failure placed the resident at risk for diminished quality of life. Findings included . Per review of the 01/19/2024 annual assessment, Resident 31 had diagnoses which included neurogenic bladder, (a condition in which one lacked bladder control due to a brain, spinal cord, or nerve problem), and utilized a urinary catheter. On 03/06/2024 at 12:54 PM, Resident 31 was observed with the urine collection bag of their catheter attached to the bed, not covered by a privacy bag. Staff J, Nursing Assistant emptied the urine into a container and the procedure was visualized from the doorway of Resident 31's room. Additional observations of the collection bag without a privacy bag were observed on 03/06/2024 at 12:54 PM, 03/07/2024 at 9:22 AM, 03/08/2024 at 8:50 AM, 03/11/2024 at 9:00 and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a discharge summary that included a recapitulation/synopsis of the resident's stay as required, for 1 of 1 sampled residents (94), reviewed for community discharge. This failure placed the resident at risk for having an incomplete medical record. Findings included . Per the admission assessment dated [DATE], Resident 94 had diagnoses which included urinary retention and aspiration pneumonia (when food or liquid is breathed into the airways or lungs, instead of being swallowed), had moderate cognitive impairments, and needed moderate to substantial assistance to complete activities of daily living. A record review showed Resident 94 was admitted to the facility for physical and occupational therapy, following deconditioning related to the above diagnoses. The resident discharged to home on [DATE]. A review of the discharge packet showed the resident was discharged with a referral to a wound care provider and included the list of prescribed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents with fluid balance concerns were monitored for 1 of 3 sampled residents (89) reviewed for fluid restrictions. This failure placed residents at risk for adverse health events and decreased quality of life. Findings included The facility provided policy Encouraging and Restriciting Fluids revised in 10/2010 documented guidelines which included to record fluid intake in milliliters (mls) as instructed by the physician. When placed on restricted fluids, remove the water pitcher and cup from the resident's room. If the resident refuses to have the pitcher removed, notify the supervisor and provider to discuss the risk and benefits of continuing versus discontinuing the restriction to honor the resident's preference. A review of the record documented Resident 89 had diagnoses including cirrhosis of the liver (scarring caused by many years of damage to the liver from various sources), ascites (fluid in the abdomen caused by cirrhosis) and general edema (too much fluid trapped in the body's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Registered Dietician (RD) had completed comprehensive nutritional assessments as required for 2 of 4 sampled residents (4, 83) reviewed for nutrition.This failure placed the residents at risk for unplanned weight loss and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 4> The 01/15/2024 quarterly assessment showed Resident 4 was able to make decisions regarding their care, was independent for eating, and had diagnoses which included depression, diabetes and stroke. On 03/08/2024 at 2:29 PM, Resident 4 was observed lying in bed watching television. When asked about the food, the resident stated lunch was good, and the food was all right. Review of the nutritional care plan last revised 08/24/2022 showed Resident 4 was identified as being at nutritional risk and instructed nursing staff to adhere to the resident's food preferences. In addition, the interventions stated the RD and dietary manager would update preferences…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received their scheduled medications on the mornings they had dialysis for 1 of 7 sampled residents (15) reviewed for medication administration. This failure put residents at risk for worsening of their chronic health conditions or unintended adverse events. Findings included . A quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident 15 had diagnoses including end-stage renal disease (ESRD) dependent on dialysis (a means of removing waste from the body when the kidneys no longer function) and atrial fibrillation (AFIB, irregular heartbeat) and Parkinson's disease (nerve cell damage in the brain that affects movement). The resident was cognitively intact and able to participate in their care. Resident 15 had the following provider orders: -06/24/2023 Multivitamin, one tablet daily for supplement -09/14/2023 Apixaban 5 milligrams (mg) twice daily for anticoagulant (prevents blood clots from forming) -09/14/2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure controlled medications (medications that have a high risk for abuse such as narcotics, anti-anxiety, hypnotic and hallucinogenics) stored in the medication refrigerators were secured in a permanently affixed container for 2 of 2 medication rooms reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed the facility at risk for potential diversion or misappropriation of narcotic medications. Findings included . On 03/13/2024 at 3:32 PM, in the second floor medication room, the medication refrigerator was inspected with Staff O, Registered Nurse (RN). The door of the refrigerator had a padlock and contained numerous medications that required refrigeration. The controlled medications (Ativan, an anti-anxiety medication and Marinol, an anti-nausea medication) were in an open plastic basket on a shelf in the refrigerator. On 03/14/2024 at 10:24 AM, the medication refrigerator in the first floor medication room was inspected with Staff P, RN. The door of the fridge had a padlock and contained numerous medications that required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — isolatedProvide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dietary staff had the required qualifications (current Food Worker Cards) for two of nine sampled dietary staff (L, M). This failure had the potential risk for unsafe food handling practices and placed all residents at risk for developing foodborne illness. Findings included . A review of the dietary cards on 3/13/2024 at 2:00pm showed no Washington State Food Workers card for Staff L, Food Service Worker, and a Washington State Food Workers card for Staff M, Food Service Worker that had expired on 3/7/2024. On 3/13/2024 at 3:00pm Staff K, Dietary Manager, provided a copy of a Washington State Food Workers card for Staff L with an effective date of 3/13/2024. When asked, Staff K stated Staff L had been working with an expired food handler's card and had just renewed it. In an interview on 03/14/2024 at 12:52 PM, Staff K stated they did not have a process for ensuring food handler cards were renewed prior to the expiration date but were working on getting a process into place. They stated a process for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served in a sanitary manner during 2 of 2 meal preparations observed. One staff member with a beard was not wearing a beard covering. This failure caused potential risk of contamination of food and exposure of all residents to food borne illness. Findings included . During an observation on 03/06/2024 at 10:49 AM, Staff Q, Cook, was preparing food for lunch service. They were noted to have a beard and were not wearing a beard covering. During an observation on 03/13/2024 at 10:59 AM, Staff Q was serving food for the lunch meal. They were noted to have a beard and were not wearing a beard covering. In an interview on 03/13/2024 at 11:32 AM, Staff Q was asked why they were not wearing a beard covering and they stated in the 5 years they had worked at the facility it had never been an issue and they usually kept their beard shorter. They also stated they didn't know if there were beard covers available. During an observation on 03/13/2024 at 11:35 AM Staff Q put a beard cover on over their beard and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure appropriate hand hygiene was performed during the meal service for 1 of 2 dining rooms, during wound care for 1 of 2 sampled residents (31) reviewed for wounds and during personal care for 1 of 1 sampled residents (36). These failures placed the residents at risk for infections and decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Dining Room> During a lunch observation of the second-floor dining room on 03/06/2024 at 11:59 AM, Staff T, Nursing Assistant, donned gloves, then pushed a resident up to the table and no hand hygiene was performed. Staff T then removed lids from their food items, left the dining room wearing the same pair of gloves, grabbed a straw and placed it into their drink, then removed gloves and performed hand hygiene. During the same lunch observation at 12:03 PM, Staff T donned gloves and assisted a resident with cutting up their meat. The resident's table mate attempted to grab their milk and put their hands on top of the container where fluids are consumed. Staff T did not remove the milk and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure equipment to allow residents to call for staff assistance was provided for 1 of 19 sampled residents (44) reviewed for resident call systems. This failure placed residents at risk of having unmet care needs, accidents, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Per the quarterly assessment dated [DATE], Resident 44 had diagnoses which included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breath), dementia, and falls. Resident 44 had moderate cognitive impairments, and needed partial to substantial assistance to complete activities of daily living. Review of Resident 44's care plan dated 06/08/2022, documented resident was at risk for falling. Staff were to ensure call light was within reach and to encourage the resident to use it as needed. During an observation on 03/06/2024 at 2:59 PM, Resident 31's call light was under their bed, not within their reach. Subsequent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 7 sample residents (Resident 4), reviewed for abuse, were treated with dignity and respect by all facility staff. This failure placed the resident at risk for feeling disrespected and having a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of a facility investigation report dated 12/11/2023 showed a verbal altercation occurred between Staff D, Nursing Assistant, Resident 4, and the resident's representative in the dining room on 12/08/2023. Per the report, Staff D was monitoring residents in the dining room and was providing verbal direction to Resident 4 and their representative regarding infection control procedures, which upset the resident, who then began yelling at Staff D. Per Staff D's written statement, Staff D became upset and also began yelling at Resident 4. Included in the investigation report were statements from staff and residents who witnessed the interaction which documented Staff D was yelling that they were in charge of the dining room while pointing their finger in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sample residents (Resident 1), reviewed for medication administration, received medications appropriately, in accordance with a valid physician's order. This failure resulted in a significant medication error which placed the resident at risk for discomfort and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of a facility investigation dated 12/07/2023 showed Resident 1 went to an appointment with an external provider in November 2023, and reported to facility on 12/05/2023 that their provider had changed one of their medication orders during their previous visit, which the resident was not yet receiving. Per the investigation, the provider had sent the new order directly to the pharmacy and had not notified the facility of the order change. Review of the November 2023 and December 2023 Medication Administration Records (MAR) showed Resident 1 received 2 tablets of Suboxone (medication that treats opioid addiction) 2-0.5 milligram (mg) every eight hours, from 11/10/2023 to 12/05/2023. Further review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-12 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sample residents (Resident 3), reviewed for abuse, were treated with dignity and respect by all facility staff. This failure placed the resident at risk for feeling disrespected, and having a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of a facility investigation report dated 09/02/2023 showed a verbal altercation occured between Staff D, Nursing Assistant, and Resident 3 in the resident's room that day. Per the report, Staff D was providing care to the resident and the resident was berating and cussing at the staff member, and the staff member in return cussed at the resident before leaving the room. Staff D immediately reported the incident to Staff C, Registered Nurse, who had the staff member leave the building for the duration of the investigation. The resident was monitored after the incident and stated they felt safe in the facility. On 09/12/2023 at 12:46 PM Resident 3 was observed sitting up in their wheelchair in the hallway outside their room laughing and joking with nearby…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to supervise a resident to prevent elopement (leaving a facility without notice or supervision) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 4), reviewed for accidents/supervision. This failure placed the resident at risk of injury, becoming lost, and/or exposure to the elements. Findings included . Review of the 05/15/2023 annual assessment showed Resident 4 had diagnoses of stroke (medical event where blood supply to the brain is interrupted or reduced) and aphasia (communication disorder resulting from damage to the brain), could not make themselves verbally understood, and was moderately cognitively impaired. Per the assessment the resident was independent with locomotion with the use of a wheelchair and had no wandering behaviors. Per Resident 4's elopement care plan, initiated 12/06/2022, they were only to be outside in the outdoor common areas when staff were aware they were outside, as the resident had refused a Wanderguard alarm (a device that alarms when in close proximity to a sensor placed on exit doors)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — patternTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure incidents of potential abuse/neglect were reported to the State Survey Agency within the required two-hour time frame for 5 of 6 sampled resident (37, 13, 49, 73, 47), reviewed for abuse. Failure to report allegations of abuse placed the residents at risk for further abuse. Findings included Residents 37 and 13 Review of a grievance form dated 11/16/2022 at 10:45 AM showed during a Resident Council meeting, Resident 37 stated staff needed trained to not argue with residents who had dementia. The grievance documented a follow-up interview was done with Resident 37 on 11/22/2022 by Staff C, Social Services, and during the interview, the resident expressed concern that a nursing assistant (NA) had yelled at Resident 13, Resident 37's roommate. Review of the facility investigation dated 11/23/2022, showed Resident 37 had alleged neglect to Resident 13 during the follow-up interview with Staff C, and included the dated, written statement that Resident 37 had provided at the time of the interview. The statement showed the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure investigations related to allegations of abuse/neglect were initiated, thorough, and completed timely for six of six sample residents (30, 73, 47, 49, 37, 13), reviewed for abuse. These failures placed the residents at risk for repeated incidents and potential abuse. Findings included Residents 13 and 37 Per the 09/07/2022 admission assessment, Resident 13 had diagnoses of dementia and Parkinson's disease, a progressive nerve disorder that caused unintended or uncontrolled movements. In addition, the assessment showed the resident needed extensive assistance of two staff to complete activities of daily living (ADLS), such as dressing and toileting. Per the 10/06/2022 admission assessment, Resident 37 was cognitively intact and able to make decisions regarding their care. On 11/28/2022 at 10:08 AM, Resident 37 was observed in their room sitting in their wheelchair. Resident 13 was lying in bed watching television. When asked if the staff treated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-12-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pharmacy monthly medication reviews were done for 4 of 5 sampled residents (53, 30, 47, 43), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents at risk for experiencing adverse medication side effects and unmet care needs. Findings included . The 10/10/2022 quarterly assessment for Resident 53 showed diagnoses which included diabetes, anxiety, and depression. In addition, the assessment showed the resident received insulin injections, antianxiety medication, and antidepressant medication daily. Review of the April 2022 through November 2022 pharmacy monthly medication reviews showed no reviews had been completed for April 2022, July 2022, and October 2022. Per the 08/29/2022 quarterly assessment, Resident 30 had diagnoses which included anxiety, depression and schizophrenia (a serious mental illness that affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave). The assessment further showed the resident received an antipsychotic (to treat schizophrenia), antidepressant, and antianxiety medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess the facility water system and implement measures to prevent the growth of Legionella (a bacteria that grows in water and causes lung infections) and other waterborne pathogens that were based on nationally accepted standards for 81 residents at risk for waterborne illnesses. This failure placed residents at risk for illness and decreased quality of life. Findings included . The 06/24/2021 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Developing a Water Management Program to Reduce Legionella Growth & Spread in Buildings Guide to Implementing Industry Standards showed that healthcare facilities where people with chronic medical problems or weakened immune systems were housed were at increased risk for Legionella. A water management program included key steps: -establishing a water management program team -describing the building water systems using text and flow diagrams -identifying areas where Legionella could grow and spread -decide where control measures should be applied and how to monitor -establish ways to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-08 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for 1 of 1 sampled residents (45), reviewed for environment. Specifically, the bedrail padding and fall mat were dirty, unsanitary, and in poor condition. This failure placed Resident 45 at risk for possible injury, illness from unclean equipment, a lack of dignity, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 45 had diagnoses including Huntington's disease (a terminal condition that causes parts of the brain to stop working properly over time, often causing uncontrolled body movements), and dementia. A 10/31/2022 assessment showed Resident 45 was moderately cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance for activities of daily living, coughed frequently, and lost food and fluids from their mouth when they ate or drank. The 02/27/2019 comprehensive care plan showed the resident was dependent on staff for meeting their emotional, physical and social needs, had significant uncontrolled body movements, was risk for skin tears and falls, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two of six sampled residents (49, 73), investigated for abuse were free from abuse, and protected from further abuse after staff were notified of the allegations. This failure resulted in a second allegation from a different resident about the same staff member, when that staff member was not removed from resident care. Additionally, those residents were not monitored for emotional harm following the allegations of abuse. These failures placed the residents at risk of unrecognized emotional harm and potential additional abuse. Findings included . Resident 49 According to a 08/01/2022 comprehensive assessment Resident 49 had severe visual impairment and no hearing loss. The document also showed that they were alert, oriented, and had no cognitive impairment. A progress note, dated 11/04/2022 at 3:05 PM, showed that on 10/31/2022, Staff L, Nursing Assistant (NA), reported that the resident requested to use the phone. (The note did not identify who this was reported to). Per the note Staff G, NA, had loudly said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of the hospital transfer of one sampled resident (21), reviewed for hospitalization, as required. This failure disallowed the resident additional advocacy per 42 CFR 483.15(c)(4)(ii)(D) from the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. Findings included . A 07/18/2022 comprehensive assessment showed that Resident 21 was cognitively intact, had frequent urinary tract infections, and required a urinary catheter (a tube inserted in the bladder to continuously drain urine into a bag.) A progress note on 09/01/2022 at 1:53 PM, showed that the resident's condition had deteriorated, and they were transferred to the hospital by ambulance. During an interview on 12/01/2022 at 3:54 PM, Staff A, Administrator, stated that they did not have a notification to the ombudsman's office for Resident 21. They had not realized that the requirement was for all discharges or transfers, not just facility-initiated discharges. Per Staff A, they thought they were following the required process, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure falls were thoroughly investigated, and/or fall prevention interventions specific to resident needs were identified and consistently implemented, for one of two sampled residents (30), reviewed for accidents. Failure to comprehensively evaluate possible root causes, and revise and implement interventions to meet the resident's needs, placed the resident at risk for continued falls. Findings included . Review of the 08/29/2022 quarterly assessment showed Resident 30 had diagnoses to include coronary artery disease (damage or disease in the heart's major blood vessels), high blood pressure, anxiety, depression, schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel and behave clearly), delusions (a belief or altered reality that is persistently held despite evidence or agreement to the contrary, generally in reference to a mental disorder), and atrial fibrillation (an irregular often rapid heart rate that commonly causes poor blood flow). Per the 08/23/2022 fall risk assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and notify the physician of the absence of urinary output, for one sampled resident (21), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed all residents at risk for lack of monitoring. Findings included . A 07/18/2022 comprehensive assessment showed that Resident 21 was cognitively intact, had frequent urinary tract infections (UTI's), and required a urinary catheter (a tube inserted in the bladder to continuously drain urine into a bag). A 09/01/2022 progress note, written that day at 1:53 PM, showed that the resident reported having felt unwell for several days. The note further showed that resident had no urinary output since the previous morning, according to the nursing assistant. The assigned nurse noted that the resident was sluggish, shaking more than usual and their abdoment was swollen and hard. The staff nurse flushed the urinary catheter (to determine if it was blocked), and the resident yelled out in pain. Staff E, Resident Care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP, a therapy that pumps air into the lungs through the nose or nose and mouth that keeps the airway open) respiratory equipment was cleaned and maintained according to professional standards for 1 of 4 sampled residents (1), reviewed for respiratory care. This failure placed Resident 1 and other residents that required CPAP therapy at risk for lung infections and deterioration of their health. Findings included . Resident 1's record showed they had diagnoses including obstructive sleep apnea (a decrease in airflow and upper airway collapse while breathing when asleep). A 09/19/2022 assessment showed the resident was cognitively intact, had increased shortness of breath when lying flat, and required oxygen therapy. The 03/14/2022 provider orders showed the resident was to use a CPAP machine (continuous positive airway pressure, a respiratory therapy that pumps air into the lungs to treat sleep apnea) per preprogrammed settings with 4 liters of supplemental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0700 — isolatedTry different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety by assessing the risk for entrapment, reviewing risks and benefits of bed rails (side rails), and obtaining informed consent prior to the use of them for one of two sampled residents (30), reviewed for accidents. These failures placed the residents at risk for injury and diminished quality of life. Findings included . The facility policy titled, Bed Safety dated December 2007, showed that staff shall obtain consent for the use of side rails from the resident or the resident's legal representative, prior to their use. On the policy it was handwritten by Staff B, Director of Nursing, that an assistive device assessment was needed, which included safety questions and interventions. Review of the Assistive Device Assessment form did not include the possibility of entrapment related to side rails. Review of the 08/29/2022 quarterly assesment showed that Resident 30 admitted in May 2020 with multiple mental health diagnoses, and had no restraints or bed rails. During an observation on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and record review, the licensed nursing staff failed to recognize significant changes in 1 of 1 sampled residents (11), reviewed for a change in condition. This placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included: Per the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment - a mandated process for clinical assessment of all residents in nursing homes - a significant change must be completed when two areas of decline are noted. A progress note dated 11/10/2022 at 12:39 PM showed that Resident 11 had significant weight loss related to their nutritional intake. Additionally, they added that the resident was making end-of-life statements to staff. On 06/04/2022, the resident's weight was 194 pounds, and on 12/07/2022 their weight was 174 pounds. This was a 10.31% loss in 6 months. According to the MDS parameters, this was considered to be a significant weight loss. A progress note dated 11/15/2022 at 11:40 AM showed that resident was not interested in doing things, and just wanted to sleep unbothered. The note also showed that resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete performance reviews at least once every 12 months, and provide in-service education based on the outcome of the reviews , as required, for one of five sampled staff (G), whose records were reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving care from inadequately trained staff. Findings included . During an interview on 12/08/2022 at 1:15 PM, Staff E, Resident Care Manager (RCM), stated that they were new to the role of RCM. They further explained they were in the process of doing Staff G's performance evaluation when the allegations of abuse came up. They were advised to put the evaluation on hold, as they were not sure what Staff G's role would be moving forward. Staff E stated that performance evaluations should be done yearly. They reported that they did not have the evaluations in their office, but they would find it for Staff G and provide the most recent copy. On 12/08/2022 at 2:12 PM, Staff E provided a copy of a performance evaluation done that same day for 2021 to 2022, and the next most recent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide behavioral health services related to depression, for one of five sampled residents (11), reviewed for behavioral and emotional health. This failure placed the resident at risk for worsening mental health, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Per the quarterly assessment dated [DATE], Resident 11 had diagnoses of Parkinson's disease (a disorder of the central nervous system that affects movement, often including tremors), diabetes (an inability of the body to produce insulin), and epilepsy (a disorder in which nerve cell activity in the brain is disturbed, causing seizures). The assessment also showed the resident had mild depression. Social Services Assessments dated 05/04/2022 and 07/22/2022 showed that the resident has diagnoses of depression and anxiety. The 07/21/2022 history and physical assessment showed the resident had depression which was chronic in nature, but also had a situational component when they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-12-08 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess if a resident's change of condition was the result of a progression of a medical condition or a side effect of the prescribed psychotropic medications, (medication that can affect the mind, emotions, and behaviors), for one of five sampled residents (43), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk of receiving unnecessary medication, unmet care needs, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Per the 10/10/2022 significant change assessment, Resident 43 had diagnoses which included dementia, a traumatic brain injury, and Huntington's disease, a hereditary condition where nerve cells in the brain break down causing movement, thinking and psychiatric disorders. In addition, the assessment showed the resident received psychotropic medication daily. Further review of the significant change assessment showed the assessment was completed due to changes in the following care areas: cognition, communication, activities of daily living, and antipsychotic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF VETE | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | 100% | since 11/21/2001 |
| GILBERT, SOLOMON | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 05/22/2023 |
| MURRAY, DANIEL | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY | — | since 11/16/2021 |
| PUENTE, DAVID | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2023 |
| WESTHOFF, TERRANCE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/01/2020 |
| MICHAELS, MARK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/13/2023 |
| MORAN, JULIE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 08/14/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 12 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505509. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-03-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.