No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Sunshine Health & Rehab

10410 East Ninth Avenue, Spokane, WA 99206 · For profit - Individual · 37 certified beds · (509) 926-3547 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (509) 926-3547 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0610) — cited Jun 2023
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • about 28% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8921 E Alki Ave Ste 1 · (877) 522-1275 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
10410 E 9th Ave · (509) 228-7092 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
9423 E Fourth Ave · (509) 928-2535 · Call to confirm hours
Park
105 N. Balfour · (509) 921-1000 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
10304 E 9th Ave · (509) 462-2939

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 5 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.3%1.3%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.8%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.3%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.7%13.4%12.0%better

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

71.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 538 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

71.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.3%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
63.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
1.44U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.60hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.67hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.17hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 63.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 351 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 1.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 99% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF71.0%CMS range 67.9–74.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.3%CMS range 7.7–11.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge63.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge49.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge52.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.5%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting99.5%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.4%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.0%CMS range 3.3–6.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.711.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

1.64
RN hours/ resident / day
0.70
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.65
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.99
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.84
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 37 beds and averages 32.3 residents a day — about 87% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.65 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.04 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.36 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 1.95 to 0.84 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

9
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-30)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-10-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that residents, families and visitors had access to grievance forms if they wanted to file a grievance anonymously. The facility also failed to ensure residents knew the process for filing grievances for 4 of 4 residents (Resident's 61,15, 66 and 51) reviewed for the grievance process in Resident Council. Additionally, staff were unaware of the location of grievance forms in the event a resident, family member or visitor requested a form. This failure placed the residents at risk for not being able to voice concerns and have their concerns resolved in a timely manner.Findings included . Review of a facility policy dated 10/2025 titled Resident/Family Grievance Policy a Procedure showed; the facility staff will make grievance forms available to residents, family members and friends. During a Resident Council meeting on 01/28/2026 at 10:42 AM, Resident's 61, 15, 66 and 51 each stated they were unaware of the grievance process to include how to file a grievance anonymously or where the forms were located.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 6 of 7 residents (Residents 44, 7, 64, 61, 20, and 49) were accurately assessed for activity preferences to mitigate the risk of boredom and enhance quality of life. Additionally, the facility failed to have a registered nurse ensure the activity assessments were timely and appropriately completed. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet psycho-social needs and a diminished quality of life.Findings included.Review of the Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 Manual dated 10/2019 Section F: Preferences for Customary Care and Routine Activities, showed, quality of life can be greatly enhanced when care respects the residents choices regarding activities that are important to them. Information directly from the resident or representative provides specific individualized daily activity planning. Resident 44Review of the resident's medical record showed they were admitted the facility with diagnoses which…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. Four medication errors were identified for 3 of 8 residents (Residents 31, 61 and 75) observed during 25 medication administration opportunities that resulted in an error rate of 16%. This failure placed residents at risk for not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medication and possible adverse side effects.Findings included. Review of the Instructions for use (IFU) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) revised 07/2023, stated to prime the insulin (a medication used to manage blood sugar levels in the blood) pen (a pre-filled disposable device containing insulin) with a new needle prior to each injection administration. Priming was meant to remove air from the needle and the cartridge that may collect during usages. In addition, the IFU stated to insert the needle into the skin, press plunger all the way down, and continue to hold the plunger and slowly count to five prior to removing the needle. These steps were to ensure the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed infection control measures, including Personal Protective Equipment [(PPE) protective garments and gear used to minimize exposure to hazards that can cause injury or illness], intended to mitigate the transmission of shingles (a viral infection that causes a painful, burning rash with blisters) were followed for transmission-based precautions [(TBP) additional precautions used with residents that are suspected or confirmed to have an infection] for 7 of 7 staff members (Staff L, M, N, O, P, Q, K); Additionally the facility failed to ensure medical supplies were maintained in a manner to prevent healthcare-associated infections by failing to remove expired sterile and non-sterile clinical supplies from 1 of 1 treatment storage rooms, reviewed for infection control. The facility's failure to remove expired medical supplies from the clinical environment placed the residents at an increased risk for communicable diseases…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that resident dignity was maintained for 2 of 3 residents (Resident's 32 and 58) reviewed for resident rights to privacy and a dignified existence. Residents 32 and 58 had their medical information discussed and were assessed in front of other residents and visitors while in the common area. This failure placed them at risk for embarrassment and lack of confidentiality related to their medical care. Findings included .Record review of an undated facility policy titled [Resident Rights showed; as a nursing home resident you have certain rights and protections under federal and state law.including the right to have your personal information kept private. Resident 32 Review of the resident's record showed they were admitted with diagnoses which included Parkinson's ( a movement disorder of the nervous system that worsen' s over time) and dementia. Review of the comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident was cognitively…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review, and validate the Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARR, an assessment to ensure individuals with serious mental illness [SMI] or intellectual/developmental disabilities [ID/DD] are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) were correct on admission or updated for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 64) reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed the residents at risk for not receiving the care and services appropriate for their needs.Findings included.Review of Resident 64's medical record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including a fracture of the lower spine, long term pain, depression (a mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest) and anxiety (a feeling of unease, worry, or fear about something that might happen in the future). The 01/16/2026 comprehensive assessment showed the resident's cognition was intact and they were able to make…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — isolated
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: A) establish a Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) policy for the inclusion/utilization of information from all resident care departments, including residents/resident representatives (RR) feedback/input data that would be used to identify high risk, problem prone areas or opportunities for improvement and, B) implement an effective QAPI program that incorporated a thorough collection/analysis of resident/RR feedback data and information from all departments/staff involved in 1 of 1 QAPI Program. This failure placed residents at an increased risk for unidentified complications, prompted corrective action towards high-risk/problem prone areas and unmet care needs.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, QAPI Policy and Procedure, dated January 2023 showed, the facility's QAPI committee programs purpose was to take a systematic, interdisciplinary, Comprehensive, data driven approach (refers to actions , decisions, or processes that are guided by data rather than personal experience, and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0868 — isolated
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) committee included the required members and met at least quarterly (once every quarter of the year or every three months) for 2 of 4 quarters (Q2 and Q3) reviewed for QAA. The failure to meet quarterly increased the facility's risk of unrecognized quality deficiencies, the facility's ability to effectively correct identified issues and ongoing unmet care needs regarding residents' quality of life.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Policy and Procedure, dated January 2023 showed, the facility's QAA committee would collect and obtain data from several areas including staff/resident input, critical incidents and patterns which would then be reviewed to .identify problems. Additionally, the policy stated the committee would conduct a meeting at least quarterly.Review of the facility's policy titled, QAA- Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Plan, dated January 2020 showed, the committee member would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary (relating to the conditions that affect hygiene and health) environment for 1 of 1 Laundry room (LR 1), reviewed for a functional environment. This failure placed residents and staff at an increased risk of cross-contamination (the harmful spread of diseases). Findings included.Observations of LR 1, accompanied by Staff R, Environmental/Maintenance Director, on 01/28/2026 from 2:05 PM to 2:44 PM showed:Washing machine (WM) number one was positioned next to a wall within LR 1, and behind the WM was a one foot (ft, a unit of measure) long by 1/2 ft wide puddle of water, directly underneath the machine, on the concrete floor. The water was noted to be coming from a metal plate attached to the bottom of the WM, with the leak somewhere inside the WM, dripping down to the bottom floor and wall (Staff R stated the WM's would sometime get clogged up with lint during the laundered cycle and water had been known to leak out before). The bottom of the white drywall (a name for a type of board, made from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 5) were fully informed of their care in language they could understand. This failure placed the resident at risk of poor understanding in their health care decisions and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Per the 04/20/2025 admission assessment, Resident 5's vision was severely impaired, and they did not use corrective lenses. Review of the 04/16/2025 care plan showed Resident 5 had a left eye prosthetic (medical device that replaces a missing body part) and was legally blind in their right eye. Review of the 05/06/2025 Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC; official document issued as a formal notice about termination or denial of coverage for specific healthcare services or items) showed it was signed by Resident 5. Per the form, if the resident wished to appeal the decision to end their skilled nursing facility services, they were required to do so by noon the following day, 05/07/2025, by calling a phone number listed on the form. In an interview on 06/11/2025 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-16 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice related to nursing assessments for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 1), reviewed for quality of care. This failure placed the resident at risk for injury and adverse outcomes. Findings included . Per the Washington State Board of Nursing Frequently Asked Questions (https://nursing.wa.gov/practicing-nurses/frequently-asked-questions#NA-FAQ) assessments requiring the use of the nursing process must be completed by an individual with a nursing license (licensed practical nurse or registered nurse). Per the facility's policy titled, Resident Fall Prevention Protocol, revised August 2024, showed nursing staff were to complete fall risk assessments following a fall, and were to assess the level of injury present. Review of the March 2025 progress notes for Resident 1 showed on 03/29/2025 the resident had a fall in their bathroom and had been assisted up into their wheelchair before the nurse assessed them for injury. Per the note, the resident had pain and swelling to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-29 · tag F0620 — widespread
    Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to not request or require residents to waive their rights to retain personal property including items of value to admit to the facility for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 23, 76, 184, and 185), reviewed for resident rights. This failure placed all residents at risk of inability to exercise their resident rights, unmet needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights revised February 2018, showed residents had the right to keep and use their personal belongings and property as long as it did not interfere with the rights, health, or safety of others. The facility was to protect resident property from theft. The policy further showed residents had the right to manage their own money, choose a trusted person to do so, or may deposit funds into a personal resident account (trust fund) with the facility. The facility must allow residents access to their bank accounts, cash, and other financial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to review policies and/or procedures yearly as required, perform hand hygiene when indicated, and store soiled laundry in a manner to prevent the spread of infection. In addition, the facility failed to implement, follow, and discontinue transmission-based precautions when indicated for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 23 and 135), reviewed for infection control. This failure placed all residents, staff, and visitors at risk of development of a multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO), communicable diseases, and diminished quality of life Findings included . POLICIES Review of the facility policy titled, Vaccination of Residents, showed the policy was revised November 2012. No documentation was found to show the policy had been reviewed yearly as required. Review of the facility policy titled, Influenza Vaccine, showed the policy was revised November 2012. No documentation was found to show the policy had been reviewed yearly as required.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-29 · tag F0882 — widespread
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Preventionist met the qualifications for experience, education, training and/or certification for the role to assume responsibility of the facility's Infection Prevention and Control Program for 1 of 1 sampled staff (Staff C), reviewed for infection preventionist qualifications. This failure placed all residents, staff, and visitors at risk of contracting communicable diseases, unmet infection control issues, and lack of oversite of the facility staff's infection control practices. Findings included . In an interview on 10/21/2024 at 9:03 AM, Staff A, Administrator, stated Staff C was the facility's infection preventionist. Documentation of Staff C's completion of specialized infection prevention and control training was requested at that time. No documentation was provided. Review of the 10/21/2024 staff list showed Staff C was identified as the facility's only infection prevention and control staff. In an interview on 10/24/2024 at 4:06 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing, stated Staff C was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0640 — pattern
    Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to routinely encode and transmit resident assessment data to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) within the required timeframe for 7 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 6, 7, 8, 25, 48, 50, and 53), reviewed for timeliness in encoding and transmission of Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool). This failure affected federal health information data gathering and placed residents at risk for inaccurate monitoring of the residents' progress over time, untimely comprehensive review of residents' health data/information, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Long Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual Version 1.18.11 revised October 2023, showed the RAI consisted of three basic components: the MDS, the Care Area Assessment (CAA) and the RAI utilization guidelines. The utilization of the three component of the RAI yields information about…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently provide bathing for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 28 and 234), reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). This failure placed residents at risk for poor personal hygiene, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Activities of Daily Living reviewed October 2024, showed the facility would ensure a resident's abilities in ADLs did not deteriorate unless deterioration was unavoidable. The policy further showed care, and services would be provided to include bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care. A resident who was unable to carry out ADLs would receive the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, personal and oral hygiene. <Resident 28> According to the comprehensive assessment, dated 10/05/2024, Resident 28 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, malnutrition and anxiety disorder. The assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to routinely implement a system with sufficient detail to enable an accurate reconciliation of all controlled drugs, including the facilities emergency medication supply in 1 of 1 sampled medication rooms (Victorian Rose) reviewed for medication storage. This failure placed the facility at increased risk for potential controlled substance drug diversion and detracted from the facility's ability to promptly identify drug diversion. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Medication Storage in the Facility reviewed January 2020, showed medication storage conditions were monitored on a monthly basis by the consultant pharmacist or the pharmacy designee. Controlled substances that required refrigeration were to be stored within a locked box, attached to the inside of the refrigerator. The policy further showed controlled substances were subject to special handling, storage, disposal and record keeping. Medications subject to abuse or diversion were to be stored in permanently affixed, double locked…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food safety for 1 of 1 facility kitchens, reviewed. This failure placed residents at risk for food borne illness and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the undated facility policy titled, Record of Food Temperatures showed the dietary department would check food temperatures on all items prepared by the dietary department, hot foods should be held at 135 degrees Fahrenheit (F), and potentially hazardous cold food kept at or below 41 degrees F. The policy instructed staff to measure and record food temperature on a temperature log every meal. Hot food temperature should be checked when placed on the steam table. Food that did not meet food code standard temperature were not to be served. Cold menu items were to be placed in an ice bath pan for holding until served. The policy instructed staff to clean, sanitize and calibrate the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to routinely provide education on benefits and potential side effects of vaccinations, offer pneumococcal (bacteria that could cause respiratory infections) and influenza (flu, contagious viral respiratory illness) vaccinations when indicated, and document in the resident's medical record accordingly for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 4, 52 and 78), reviewed for immunizations. These failures placed residents at risk of being unable to make informed decisions regarding immunizations, acquiring communicable diseases, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Vaccination of Residents revised November 2012, showed all residents would be offered vaccinations to aid in the prevention of infectious diseases. Residents and/or their representatives would be provided information and education regarding benefits and potential side effects of vaccinations. The policy further showed education provided would be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-29 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documented evidence of the required annual 12-hours of in-service training, which included dementia training for 5 of 5 nursing assistants (I, L, M, O, V ), reviewed for nursing assistant continuing education and abuse prevention for 2 of 5 staff (I, V), as required. This deficient practice placed the residents at risk of being cared for by inadequately trained staff, and unmet care needs. Findings included . According to the Facility Assessment Tool, dated 07/23/2024, the facility required in-service nurse assistants (NA) trainings must be at least 12 hours per year, and include dementia management and resident abuse prevention training. Sunshine Health Facilities, Inc. Employee Handbook, 2024, page 32, documented Many of the in-services offered to staff are required by state law. Participation in in-services are reflected in your performance evaluations and required as part of your employment. During an interview on 10/28/2024 at 2:37 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing, stated that the staff trainings for NA's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident was evaluated and assessed by the interdisciplinary team (IDT), a physician order was obtained, and care planned for safe self-administration of medications, as required for 1 of 4 sampled residents, (Resident 23), reviewed for resident rights. This failure placed residents at risk of medication errors, adverse side effects, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Preparation and General Guidelines for Self-Administration of Medications effective January 2020, showed residents who desired to self-administer medications were permitted to do so after the IDT determined it was safe for the resident and other residents of the facility and there was a provider's order to self-administer. An assessment would be completed of the resident's cognitive, physical and visual ability. The IDT would verify the resident's ability to self-administer medication by conducting a skills…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. Specifically, two medication errors were identified during 26 medication administration opportunities. This resulted in an error rate of 7.69 %. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving subtherapeutic effects of their medications, possible adverse side effects, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to progress notes dated 10/21/2024, Resident 141 was admitted to the facility that day with diagnoses that included Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD, a gastrointestinal disorder causing a backup of stomach contents back into the esophagus) and Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS, a bowel disorder characterized by abdominal pain, discomfort and bloating). The resident was alert and made their needs known. On 10/24/2024 at 8:38 AM, observed as Staff N, Registered Nurse, prepared and gave Resident 141 their medications. The resident was sitting up with a finished breakfast tray in front of them. Metoclopramide 5mg (an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0801 — isolated
    Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    F801 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to employ a dietician that had the licensure and/or certification to practice as a Registered Dietician in Washington State, as required for 1 of 1 staff (Staff U), reviewed for Registered Dietician qualifications. This failure placed all residents at risk for unmet nutritional needs and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Professional Licenses showed all professional licenses were tracked using an online human resources management system. The policy further showed if a license lapsed, the employee would be removed from the schedule and not allowed to work until resolved. Review of the Academy of Nutrition of Dietetics Scope of Practice for Registered Dietician Nutritionist revised 2024, showed RDNs operated within applicable federal and state laws and regulations and accreditation organization standards. When the practitioner and patient/client were located in different states, the practitioner must be licensed in the state where the patient/client is located…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement antibiotic protocols to ensure antibiotics were appropriately prescribed for 1 of 6 sampled residents (Resident 4), reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. This failure placed residents at risk of development of [NAME]-drug-resistant organisms (MDRO), adverse side effects, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Antibiotic Stewardship - Review and Surveillance of Antibiotic Use and Outcomes revised July 2016, showed antibiotic usage and outcome data would be collected, documented on the antibiotic surveillance tracking form, information used to guide decisions for improvement of individual resident antibiotic prescribing practices and facility wide antibiotic stewardship. The policy showed all clinical infections treated with antibiotics would undergo review by the infection preventionist or designee within 48 hours of antibiotic start to determine if continued therapy was justified. The policy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized care plan for 1 of 3 residents (1) reviewed who had unique environmental fall risk concerns. Specifically, Resident 1 was at risk for tripping over their lengthy oxygen tubing, and this was not identified and included in their fall prevention care plan. This failure placed Resident 1 and other residents at risk for avoidable falls, injury and decreased quality of life. Findings included . The facility Resident Fall Prevention Protocol reviewed/revised 01/2024 documented the facility used a systems approach to preventing falls that included hazard identification and risk, analysis of hazards and risks, planning and implementation of individualized interventions to reduce fall risk, evaluation and monitoring for effectiveness, and updating the plan of care as necessary. An admission assessment dated [DATE] documented Resident 1 had diagnoses including right tibia fracture (shin bone) and chronic obstructive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-06-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure orders for oxygen were implemented during a transportation to the facility for admission for 1 of 3 residents (1) reviewed. Specifically, Resident 1 did not wear oxygen when transported from the hospital to the facility. Shortly after arrival, the resident had low blood pressure and developed chest pain and was returned to the emergency department for evaluation. This failure put the resident at risk for decompensation and unintended deterioration of their health. Findings included . The 05/08/2024 admission assessment documented Resident 1 had diagnoses including COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, long-standing inflammation of the lungs that can cause difficulty breathing) and atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat). Resident 1 was cognitively intact and wore oxygen. During an interview on 06/05/2024 at 2:55 PM, Resident 1's family representative stated Resident 1 had fallen at home and had broken their right knee and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-26 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sample residents (Resident 1), admitted with impaired skin integrity, and at increased risk for continued skin breakdown, was consistently monitored to prevent development of pressure areas and worsening of identified areas. This failure caused a diminished quality of life for Resident 1 when they developed a pressure ulcer on their coccyx (tailbone area) and worsening of identified at risk areas on both heels. Findings included . Record review showed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of infection in the bone of their left ankle and foot, kidney disease and heart failure. Resident 1's admission assessment dated [DATE], showed the resident required assistance to reposition in bed, was at risk for pressure ulcer development, did not have a pressure ulcer and did not refuse care. A hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] stated Resident 1 was at high risk for skin breakdown and had an infection of their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that 4 dietary staff members (Staff K, L, M, and N) wore facial hair coverings while in the kitchen, as required. In addition, the facility failed to monitor the temperature and contents of 2 refrigerators that contained resident food. Failure to monitor refrigerator temperatures and contents for expired or spoiled food, and staff not wearing beard coverings in the kitchen placed all residents at risk for food-borne illness and contamination. Findings included . According to the Policy and Procedure Manual, 2019, titled Food safety and Sanitation, employees in the nutrition services department were required to wear beard nets, when facial hair was visible. According to the Policy and Procedure Manual, 2019, titled Food Brought in from Outside Sources and Personal Food Storage, foods brought in should be labeled with the resident's name and date the food was brought into the facility. In addition, the document showed that all refrigerators should have internal thermometers, and that designated facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement infection surveillance (an ongoing, systematic collection, analysis, and interpretation of data relating to infections to reduce spread of infections), for 6 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 20, 28, 238, 236, 3 and 21), who were reviewed for physician orders related to infections. These failures placed the residents and staff at risk for development of contagious disease. Findings included . On 06/07/2023 at 11:02 AM during an interview with Staff H, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), Infection Preventionist (IP), it was stated that they received and reviewed a list of residents taking antibiotics (medicines that fight infections caused by bacteria in humans) from the pharmacy each month. When reviewing the infection surveillance form with Staff H, they explained that they used McGreer's criteria (a data collection tool used to retrospectively [look back] to count true infections, and the appropriateness of antibiotic usage), as a method of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify an allegation as potential misappropriation of resident property, report the allegation to the State Survey Agency, and complete a thorough investigation as required for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 1), reviewed for personal property. This failure placed residents at risk for potential misappropriation of personal property and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. According to the 05/15/2023 admission assessment, Resident 1 required extensive staff assistance to perform most activities of daily living, and was able to make their needs known. During an initial interview on 06/04/2023 at 3:41 PM, Resident 1 stated that they reported to staff they were missing clothing items and money from the drawer in their room. In a follow-up interview on 06/07/2023 at 10:00 AM, Resident 1 further stated that on 05/31/2023, they reported to Staff C, Certified Occupational Therapy Assistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to act upon the pharmacist recommendation reports for 3 consecutive months, for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 10), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk of adverse medication effects and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . According to a 01/24/2023 admission assessment, Resident 10 had diagnoses which included schizophrenia (a serious mental disorder that impairs the person's ability to perceive reality), dementia, and anxiety. The pharmacist monthly medication review report to nursing for February 2023 showed that the resident was on antidepressant medications (to treat depression), a medication for neuropathy (nerve pain) and an antiplatelet medication (to decrease the risk of blood clots.) The report further showed a request by the pharmacist for supporting diagnoses to be added to the resident's record, as the resident did not have diagnoses of depression, neuropathy, or an increased risk of blood clots. A second pharmacy medication review for February 2023…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-06-16 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that direct care staffing information was accurate upon submission to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for Quarter 3 of 2024 (July 1, 2024 through September 30, 2024) reviewed for Payroll Based Journal (PBJ - mandatory reporting of staffing information based on payroll data) submission. This failure caused CMS to have inaccurate data related to facility staffing levels and had the potential to impact resident care and services. Findings included . Review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Reports (CASPER) PBJ Staffing Data Report showed the facility reported data for Quarter 3, 2024 at a level lower than required by mandated staffing levels. In an interview on 04/28/2025 at 3:43 PM Staff D, Payroll, verified the staff hours for Quarter 3, 2024. Staff D stated resident census data was pulled from the MDS (Minimum Data Set, a federally mandated process for clinical assessment of all resident in Medicaid- and Medicare-certified nursing homes) assessments, which were not current at the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
DIKES, CAROLIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR21%since 01/01/2007
DIKES, DAVIDIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE DIRECTOR21%since 01/01/2007
DIKES, NATHANIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR40%since 01/01/2007
RHOADS, PATRICKIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; CORPORATE DIRECTOR19%since 01/01/2007
DIKES, JENNIFERIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2007
RHOADS, SHERRIIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2007
ULRICH, WILLIAMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 11/04/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 13 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-1.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.1M
Related-party expense28% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 5%Medicare 58%Other / private 38%

This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 28% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$610per resident / day
operating cost
$18,539per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$598per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505411. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next