Josephine Caring Community

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 157 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 54.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 109 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 160 beds and averages 115.6 residents a day — about 72% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.97 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.82 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.04 on weekdays — 24% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.55 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 30% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-07-15 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to consistently and accurately obtain weights, recognize significant weight loss, and provide consistent assistance with eating and cueing for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 33) reviewed for nutrition. Resident 33 experienced a significant 14.6% weight loss from 05/27/2024 to 07/10/2024. This failure placed the resident at risk for further decline in their weight, unintended consequences of poor nutrition, and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Nutritional Management, dated 12/27/2023, showed that weekly weights would be obtained on new admissions for 4 weeks. After assessing the weight accuracy, the Licensed Nurse or Nursing Assistant would record the weight in the resident's electronic medical record under vital signs. Re-weighs were required for any unplanned 3-pound (lb) variance from week to week. Resident 33 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included protein calorie…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-22 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident choices/preferences regarding their bathing schedule were honored for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 2, 3, and 4) reviewed for choices. These failures placed the residents at risk for decreased cleanliness, increased risk of infection and diminished quality of life. Findings included .<RESIDENT 2>Resident 2 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis to include a stroke with right side hemiplegia (paralysis to one side of the body) and hemiparesis (a condition that causes weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body). Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) assessment, dated 12/08/2025, documented the resident was moderately impaired in decision making skills, dependent with showers/bathing and shower transfers. Review of Resident 2's Preference care plan, with a target date of 03/05/2026, documented the resident preferred to take a shower two times a week before breakfast.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure quality of care and services was provided for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 1 and 2) reviewed for skin, positioning, and assistance with meals. These failures placed residents at risk of medical complications and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .<RESIDENT 1>Resident 1 re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Parkinson's Disease (a disorder of the nervous system affecting movement), Cerebellar ataxia (damage to the brain causing poor coordination and balance problems), Dementia (affects memory), and Muscle Weakness. Review of quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-an assessment tool) assessment, dated 12/23/2025, the resident had no cognitive impairment. In a joint interview on 01/21/2026 at 12:37 PM, with Resident 1 and (Collateral Contact) CC1, Resident 1 stated they had talked to CC1 on 01/18/2026 and reported the rash to her toes and feet had worsened and was painful. Resident 1 stated that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interview the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in accordance with the state and federal laws appropriately for 1 of 2 (Rehab Unit) Medication Storage Rooms. The facility failed to ensure Schedule II-V (Substances with high potential for abuse which may lead to severe psychological or physical dependence) controlled medications were in separate locked, permanently affixed compartments not accessible to others. These failures left controlled substances unattended with potential of unauthorized access to drugs that should have been securely stored.Findings included . In an observation and interview on 09/10/2025 at 9:50 AM, Staff H, Registered Nurse/Case Manager opened the refrigerator in the Medication Room in the Rehab Unit, inside the refrigerator was a locked metal box not permanently affixed to the refrigerator. They took the locked box out of the refrigerator and Staff H opened it with a key. Observed in the box were 2 unopened bottles of Lorazepam (Scheduled IV medication that treats anxiety) oral liquid and 1 unopened…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-09-15 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a system was in place in which residents' records were complete, accurate, accessible, and systematically organized for 5 of 11 residents (Residents 5, 8, 74, 78, and 100) reviewed for accurate and complete medical records. The facility failed to ensure the medical records reflected the physician visit documentation for 3 of 6 residents (Residents 5, 78, and 100), failed to include dialysis provider notes for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 74), failed to ensure accurate documentation for advanced directives for one of one resident (Resident 8). This failure placed residents at risk for medical complications, unmet care needs, and diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the facility policy titled, Medical Records, revised date 12/06/2024 stated the medical records department will maintain the records on each resident as complete, accurately documented, readily accessible and systematically organized.Review of the facility policy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to coordinate with the preadmission screening and resident review program (PASARR) for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 8) reviewed for PASARR coordination. Resident 8 required a level II evaluation (in depth evaluation of a resident by the state designated authority) for a serious mental disorder which was not completed which placed residents at risk for unmet behavioral care needs. Findings Included.Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], discharged to the hospital on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 8's diagnoses included Parkinson's disease, depression and dementia with psychotic features (hallucinations or delusions). Review of Resident 8's PASARR Level I (screening tool for possible serious mental illness) dated 01/10/2025 documented they required a level II evaluation. Review of Resident 8's PASARR Level II invalidation statement dated 03/06/2025 documented a level II evaluation could not be completed as they were…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans were updated for 1 of 1 residents (7) reviewed for Hospice services and 1 of 1 residents (100) reviewed for dental services. This failure placed residents at risk for decreased quality of care. Findings included .<DENTAL> Review of Resident 100's care plan dated 07/09/2024 documented they had no natural teeth. The goal was Resident 100 would have no signs or symptoms of improper fit of their dentures. Interventions included assisting Resident 100 with cleaning their dentures and monitor for any oral discomfort. Review of Resident 100's progress notes documented: - On 01/09/2025 Resident 100 met with social services and reported their bottom dentures did not fit properly. -On 01/30/2025 Resident 100 was placed on alert charting related to irritation on their gums. Resident 100 reported their gums were hurting. -On 03/22/2025 Resident 100 was placed on alert for an ulcer to their lower gum and complained of sore spots on their…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure professional standards were met for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 38) reviewed for oxygen, and 1 of 3 residents (Resident 13) reviewed for diabetic (disease that affects the blood sugar levels in blood) management. The facility failed to follow physician's orders for oxygen administration and failed to ensure appropriate monitoring for diabetes was completed based on national standards. These failures placed the residents at risk for adverse outcomes, medication errors, complications, and unmet needs. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Oxygen Safety, reviewed 12/09/2024, documented the licensed nurse will verify the order and adjust the oxygen flow rate as determined by the physician. Oxygen was administered by a licensed nurse under the order from the attending physician. Review of the American Diabetes Association website on 09/15/2025, documented the national standards for monitoring a hemoglobin A1c (type of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and provide pain management to adequately control residents pain for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 63) reviewed for pain management. This failure put residents at risk of uncontrolled pain and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Pain Management, revised 01/22/20205 stated all resident would receive appropriate assessment and management for pain. Appropriate measures for pain control would be documented, then implemented according to a resident's plan of care. when a resident has pain, a pain assessment would be completed. Case Managers and the Minimum Data Set (MDS - an assessment tool) nurse will assess that the residents pain medication and management are effective, and update for further interventions and notifications. Resident 63 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include osteoporosis, dementia, and muscle weakness. The Quarterly MDS dated [DATE] documented that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify, assess, and address potential signs and/or symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 28), reviewed for mood and behavior. This failure placed residents at risk of re-traumatization, unmet behavioral health needs, and diminished quality of life.Findings included .According to the website www.mayoclinic.org Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) was a mental health condition that could develop after witnessing or being part of an extremely stressful or terrifying event. Symptoms could include flashbacks (feelings that the traumatic event was occurring again), nightmares (repeated disturbing dreams), intrusive thoughts, severe anxiety, avoidance (not wanting to think or talk about a traumatic event), changes in mood or thinking and physical and emotional reactions. These symptoms last more than one month, cause major problems in social or work situations and affect how well a person gets…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-15 · tag F0712 — isolated
  Ensure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure timely physician visits (once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission) were completed for 4 of 7 residents (5, 49, 79 and 84) reviewed for physician visits. This failure placed residents at risk of being denied face-to-face contact with a physician, comprehensive reviews and physician assessments of their health and well-being. Findings included .According to CMS (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid); The residents must be seen by a physician at least once every 30 days for the first 90 days after admission, and at least once every 60 days thereafter. After the initial physician visit in SNFs (Skilled Nursing Facility), where States allow their use, a NPP (Nurse Practitioner) may make every other required visit. A physician visit is considered timely if it occurs not later than 10 days after the date the visit was required.Review of the facility policy titled, Physician Visits reviewed and revised on 12/06/2024, showed it was the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 43 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA