Heartwood Extended Healthcare
1649 East 72nd, Tacoma, WA 98404 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (253) 472-9027 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Jun 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
- it has 6 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (85) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $382,661 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-30)
- its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 4 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 1 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 19.3% | 14.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.5% | 5.5% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.8% | 1.0% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.5% | 1.6% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.5% | 17.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.7% | 2.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 32.7% | 17.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 11.5% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.6% | 93.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 8.7% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 24.3% | 22.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.5% | 15.1% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 4.4% | 1.3% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 63.9% | 82.0% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 23.8% | 19.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.8% | 13.4% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.07 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.84 | 1.52 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
38.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 79 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 45.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.15 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 12% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 38.0%CMS range 29.0–49.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | worse than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.3%CMS range 8.0–16.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 45.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 32.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 29.0% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 6.4% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 4.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 3.9–11.7 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.82 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 103.0 residents a day — about 86% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.96 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.78 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.39 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.13 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.84 to 0.63 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
85 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 69 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify fall trends, evaluate the effectiveness of previous fall prevention interventions and to implement progressive resident centered interventions for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 66) reviewed for falls. Resident 66, who had six falls in 10 weeks (two unwitnessed non-injury and four unwitnessed with injury), experienced harm when they fell, sustained a fracture of their right distal clavicle (collar bone) that required transfer to the emergency department for evaluation and treatment. This failure placed residents at risk of repeated falls and injuries. Findings included.Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 66 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included repeated falls, diabetes (too much sugar in blood), and dementia (decline in mental ability severe enough to interfere with daily life). Resident 66 was able to make needs known. Review of the minimum data set (MDS, an assessment tool), dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess and develop/implement a care plan (CP) for the management of chronic heart problems and failed to timely identify/assess/implement interventions for a related change in condition for 1 of 3 sampled Residents (Resident 51) reviewed for hospitalization. The facility also failed to consistently monitor and document bowel movements (BMs) and implement the bowel program when needed for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 16 and 66) reviewed for bowel management. Resident 51 experienced harm when they had a significant fluid volume overload (too much fluid in the body causing difficulty breathing, increased weight and swelling/edema) and a delay in respiratory interventions resulting in an emergency transfer to the hospital for respiratory failure. The failure placed residents at risk for further decline in their conditions, discomfort, and a diminished quality of life/quality of care. Findings included . Review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-27 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure an environment free of avoidable accidents/hazards for 1 of 7 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for mechanical lift transfers. The failure to assess and develop a safe care plan for the use of a mechanical lift device, ensure staff training and competency in the use of the Named Mechanical Lift system, utilize the mechanical lift according to the manufacturers recommendations, and conduct post-fall resident assessment and investigation procedures resulted in harm to Resident 1 when they were dropped to the floor during an improper mechanical lift transfer, sustained cuts and bruising to their head and body, experienced pain, and created intense sense of fear for Resident 1 surrounding further use of the mechanical lifts. The facility staff's lack of training, failure to observe posted WARNINGS, and improper use of the mechanical lifts as recommended by the manufacturer placed residents at risk for feelings of fear, further hazards,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided in accordance with professional standards of quality for 1 of 1 Residents (Resident 20) reviewed for re-hospitalization. The facility's failure to: recognize and assess risk factors that placed the resident at risk for decline or complications,; develop a person-centered care plan with interventions that met their specific care needs related to arterial ulcers (a wound developed from prolonged inadequate blood flow) caused by Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD-narrowing or blockage of the blood vessels that carry blood from the heart to the legs),; implement physician orders timely,; recognize, and report a change of condition to the vascular surgeon caused harm to Resident 20 who developed wet gangrene (death of body tissue due to lack of blood flow or bacterial infection) and a serious bone/systemic infection that resulted in amputation of part of their foot. Findings included . According to the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-10-25 · tag F0626 — isolatedPermit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to permit 1 of 6 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for hospitalization to return to the facility after a facility-initiated transfer to the emergency room (ER). The facility's failure to provide bed hold information in writing upon transfer to the hospital, provide appropriate discharge/transfer notice and rights to an appeal prior to the facility-initiated transfer and discharge, and failure to permit Resident 1 to return to the facility and resume residence after the ER visit caused physical and psychological harm to Resident 1 who experienced unnecessary pain, anxiety, fear, humiliation, and re-traumatization. Findings included . <Policy> Review of the facility's policy, Transfer or Discharge Documentation, revised December 2016, showed each resident would be permitted to remain in the facility and not be discharged or transferred unless it was necessary for the resident's welfare and their needs could not be met in the facility; transfer/discharge was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-25 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received effective pain management consistent with professional standards of practice and according to residents' goals/preferences for 7 of 11 residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, & 7) reviewed for pain. The facility's failure to re-evaluate Resident 1's pain after medication change and ensure they had an adequate supply of medication to administer their scheduled and PRN (as needed) pain medication caused harm when Resident 1 experienced unnecessary extreme pain and was transferred the emergency room (ER) for pain medication administration. The facilities failure to properly assess resident's pain, involve residents in development and modification of a person-centered pain care plan, notify residents of changes to their pain management plan, re-evaluate the effectiveness of changes made, identify and utilize person centered non-pharmacological interventions, consider adjunctive pain modalities, provide referrals to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-24 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — patternProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a process to maintain inventory of residents' personal belongings for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 1 and 2) reviewed for loss of personal property. This failure placed residents at risk for inability to safeguard personal property, inability to receive replacement/reimbursement for missing property, and increased the risk of theft, loss and misappropriation.Findings included. Review of a facility policy titled, Notice of Theft and Loss Control Policy, updated March 2025, showed that the facility made reasonable efforts to safeguard resident property and valuables, and that suspected theft or loss of resident property was timely and thoroughly investigated. The policy further showed that Personal Belonging Inventory was completed upon admission and updated as items were sent home and new items were brought in to the facility. Resident 1Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled nursing and physical and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation into a resident's allegations of neglect to determine if abuse or neglect had taken place for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 3) reviewed for investigations. This failure placed residents at risk for ongoing abuse and/or neglect, feelings of insecurity in the facility, unmet care needs, psychological harm, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed that Resident 3 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of quadriplegia (paralysis affecting arms, legs and torso). Further review of the EHR showed that Resident 3 was totally dependent on staff for mobility and all care needs. Resident 3 was alert and oriented and was able to communicate their needs to the staff. Review of a grievance form, dated 06/01/2026 at 07:45 AM, showed that Resident 3 reported that the previous midnight (06/01/2026 at 12:00 AM) two male nursing assistants agreed to reposition…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-06-02 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — patternProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate podiatrist services for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 1, 2, and 3) reviewed for foot care. This failure placed residents at risk of infection, pain, discomfort, and a diminished quality of life.Findings included. Resident 1Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include left-side hemiplegia/hemiparesis (weakness or inability to move one side of the body) following a stoke, lung cancer, and diabetes. Resident 1 required moderate to maximum assistance from staff for activities of daily living (ADLs - dressing, bathing, eating, toileting, grooming, etc.). In an interview on [DATE] at 2:30 PM a collateral contact (CC1) stated that Resident 1 had needed podiatrist care for long, thick, ingrown toenails the entire time they were a resident in the facility, and they did not think nurses provided toenail care. CC1 further stated that Resident 1 was complaining of discomfort and had sores on their feet. CC1 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespreadEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's menus were prepared in advance, followed, and reflected input received from the residents and resident group for 3 of 3 sampled days (03/25/2026, 03/26/2026, and 03/27/2026) when reviewed for kitchen. This failure placed residents at risk of dissatisfaction with kitchen services, reduction in food consumed, avoidable weight loss, a decline in clinical condition, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Observation and record review on 03/26/2026 at 11:23 AM showed the facility menu for the week with entries for breakfast, lunch, and dinner daily hung in the facility's cafeteria. Review showed beef tip au jus, rice, seasoned peas, wheat roll, margarine, and frosted marble cake were scheduled to be served for lunch on 03/26/2026. Observation showed a sticky note was placed over the lunch menu entry for 03/26/2026 with carrots written by hand. Observation showed similar sticky notes placed over the lunch for 03/25/2026 with No apples, change to pineapple and peaches over the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an infection control program that ensured the surveillance of possible communicable diseases was completed for 1 of 3 months (January 2026) and to ensure the proper handling and processing of soiled linens for 1 of 1 laundry rooms when reviewed for infection control. These failures placed the residents at risk for infections, poor clinical outcomes and a decreased quality of life. Findings included.TrackingReview of the infection control logs for the month of January 2026 showed no infectious organisms were identified and included on the log. Further review showed an entry for Resident 110 dated 01/30/2026 which showed it was not a multidrug resistant organism (MDRO) and did not require special infection control precautions. Review of Resident 110's electronic health record (EHR) showed a laboratory test dated 01/20/2026 which identified Escherichia coli ESBL positive organism [an MDRO] confirmed, contact precautions should be observed with this patient. During an interview on 03/27/2026 at 1:37 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-30 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — patternEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safety devices did not restrict residents' ability to move and the resident or resident representative consented to the use of restrictive safety devices for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 66, 105 and 51) reviewed for physical restraints. This failure placed the residents at risk of being unnecessarily restrained and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 51 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 51 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hospice (end of life care), depression, anxiety and vascular dementia (decline in thinking skills caused by conditions that block or reduce blood flow to the brain). Resident 51 was not able to communicate their needs. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS, a required assessment), dated 02/24/2026, showed Resident 51 was dependent on staff for completing activities of daily leaving (ADL). Review of the EHR showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-30 · tag F0628 — patternProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Nursing Home Transfer/Discharge Notices and bed hold notices at the time of transfer to the hospital for 4 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 5, 6, 66, and 110) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed while in the hospital, protection of resident's rights during transfer, and diminished quality of life. Findings included. Resident 5Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's (progressive disorder that destroys memory and thinking skills), depression, and atrial fibrillation (heart rhythm disorder where the upper chambers are out of sync with the lower chambers). Resident 5 was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] for injuries to their head. Review of the EHR showed Resident 5 did not have Nursing Home Transfer and Discharge Notice or bed hold notice for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-30 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately code the resident assessment for 6 of 20 sampled residents (Residents 11, 32, 51, 33, 10, and 105) reviewed for accuracy of assessments. Failure to accurately code Residents 11 and 32's use of blood thinning medication, Resident 51's use of side rails, Resident 33's use of a breathing device, Resident 10's dental status, and Resident 105's use of a safety device placed residents at risk of unmet care needs, inaccurate information in the electronic health record, and diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 11 Review of the electronic heath record (EHR) showed Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (paralysis or weakness on one side of the body due to tissue death in the brain), dementia (decline in thinking skills caused by conditions that block or reduce blood flow to the brain), high blood pressure and depression.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform and provide written information on the formulation of advanced directives for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 99 and 15) reviewed for advanced directives. This failure placed the residents at risk of unmet needs and lack of knowledge of their rights to formulate an advanced directive. Findings included.Resident 99Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 99 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of diabetes (when the body doesn't process sugars effectively) and foot wounds. The resident was able to make needs known. Review of Resident 99's EHR showed no documentation that the resident was provided with written information on or assistance with completing advanced directives (a legal form appointing a decision maker if the resident is no longer able to make decisions). Resident 15Review of the EHR showed Resident 15 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of end stage kidney disease and was receiving…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure personal property was protected for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 9) when reviewed for personal property. This failure placed residents at risk loss of property, compromised dignity, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 9 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included polyneuropathy (disease that effects multiple nerves in the body), diabetes (too much sugar in the blood) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 9 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 03/23/2026 at 11:29 PM, Resident 9 stated they were missing two pairs of jeans that were only worn once. Observation on 03/26/2026 at 10:36 AM showed Resident 9 reported to Staff H, Registered Nurse, the missing jeans. During an interview on 03/27/2026 at 11:56 AM, Resident 9 stated they had not been contacted regarding the missing jeans. Resident 9 stated the clothes they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 69 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate, investigate, and resolve a grievance for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Residents 9) reviewed for personal property and grievances. This failure placed the residents at risk for emotional distress and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 9 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included polyneuropathy (disease that effects multiple nerves in the body), diabetes (too much sugar in the blood) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 9 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 03/23/2026 at 11:29 PM, Resident 9 stated they were missing two pairs of jeans that were only worn once. Resident 9 stated they had not reported the missing clothing to any members of staff. Observation on 03/26/2026 at 10:36 AM showed Resident 9 reported to Staff H, Registered Nurse (RN), the missing jeans. Review of the EHR showed no documentation related to Resident 9's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure injuries of unknown sources were reported to the State Hotline for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 5) when reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed residents at risk for potential abuse/neglect and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 5 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Alzheimer's disease (loss of cognitive function), congestive heart failure (when the heart is unable to pump blood efficiently) and depression. Resident 5 was unable to make needs known. Review of the January 2026 accident and incident log showed an entry dated 01/19/2026 for a fall related to Resident 5 on 01/18/2026. The fall was logged as unwitnessed with Small bruises occurring in places generally vulnerable to trauma. The fall was said to be Reasonably related to the resident's condition. The action taken was medical treatment and was not reported to the State…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate the potential for abuse and/or neglect for 1 of 2 sample residents (Resident 9) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This failure placed Resident 9 at risk for psychosocial harm and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 9 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included polyneuropathy (a neurological condition occurring when multiple nerves are damaged), diabetes (too much sugar in the blood), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 9 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 03/23/2026 at 11:24 AM, Resident 9 stated they pressed their call light and after 15 minutes Collateral Contact went to the nurse's station to request assistance which took an additional 30 minutes. During an interview on 03/23/2026 at 11:28 AM, Collateral Contact (CC), stated they were unhappy with the care Resident 9 was receiving. CC stated they worked in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop comprehensive care plans for 2 of 20 sampled residents (Residents 10 and 1) reviewed for care plans. Failure to develop care plans that accurately reflected resident care needs related to dental issues placed residents at risk for not receiving needed care and services, negative outcomes, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 10 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 10 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include quadriplegia with incomplete damage to the neck (spinal cord damaged causing partial paralysis/partial or complete loss of muscle function and/or feeling to all four limbs and torso/trunk of the body), high blood pressure, and depression. Resident 10 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 03/24/2026 at 9:17 AM, Resident 10 stated they had a dental exam two or more months ago and were told they had broken upper teeth that needed to be pulled.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide and/or conduct quarterly care conferences in a timely manner to include the residents and/or their representative for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 87 and 99) when reviewed for care planning. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 87Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 87 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dependence on renal dialysis (the process of filtering blood to remove waste and excess fluids due to kidney failure), high blood pressure, and encephalopathy (the brain does not work properly, often causing confusion, altered mental state, or personality changes). Resident 87 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 03/24/2026 at 11:52 AM, Resident 87 stated they did not remember going to a care conference. Review of Resident 87's EHR showed a care conference document dated 11/17/2025 that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure providers orders were followed for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 66 and 71) when reviewed for pain and edema. This failure placed residents at risk of increased pain and a decreased quality of life.Findings included.Resident 71 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include heart failure, diabetes (high blood sugar), anxiety and traumatic brain injury. Resident 71 was able to communicate their needs. Observation on 03/24/2026 at 11:40 AM showed Resident 71 laid in bed with their feet severely swollen. Resident 71 stated their legs were swollen and they may have a wound on the back of their leg. Review of the EHR showed Resident 71 had an order for TED hose (constrictive socks used to promote blood flow) to both lower legs to be on for 12 hours, dated 11/28/2025. During an interview on 03/26/2026 at 11:43 AM, Resident 71 stated nobody had talked to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure that residents received their showers as scheduled and incontinent briefs for 2 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 9 and 1) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). This failure placed the residents at risk for compromised dignity, unmet needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings include. Resident 9Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 9 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included polyneuropathy (disease that effects multiple nerves in the body), diabetes (too much sugar in the blood) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 9 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 03/23/2026 at 11:46 AM, Resident 9 stated they were not receiving their showers consistently because there was only one shower aid. Review of the shower EHR showed Resident 9 received four showers in the past 30 days. During an interview on 03/25/20206 at 2:41 PM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with meal service for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 8) reviewed for position and mobility. This failure placed the resident at risk for weight loss, malnutrition, and diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (paralysis or weakness on one side of the body due to tissue death in the brain), parkinsonism (disorder characterized by tremors, slowness and rigidity), asthma and epilepsy (condition of recurrent, unprovoked seizures caused by abnormal electrical activity in the brain). Resident 8 was able to communicate their needs. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS, a required assessment) dated 01/01/2026 showed Resident 8 was dependent on staff for eating, oral care, hygiene, toileting, dressing and moving in and out of bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide prompt services to maintain vision for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 10) reviewed for communication sensory. This failure placed the resident at risk of unmet vision needs, continued visual impairment, decreased mood, and diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 10 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include quadriplegia with incomplete damage to the neck (spinal cord damaged causing partial paralysis/partial or complete loss of muscle function and/or feeling to all four limbs and torso/trunk of the body), high blood pressure, and depression. Resident 10 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 03/24/2026 at 9:01 AM, Resident 10 stated their vision had become blurry quite a while ago and the last time they saw an eye doctor was about six months ago and were told they needed glasses. Resident 10 stated staff were aware they needed glasses;…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative nursing programs were provided, thoroughly evaluated for effectiveness, carried out, and accurately documented for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Resident 10) reviewed for rehabilitation and restorative services, and/or position and mobility. This failure placed the resident at risk for worsening mobility, developing contractures (permanent tightening of muscle, tendons and skin, leading to deformity), and diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 10 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include quadriplegia with incomplete damage to the neck (spinal cord damaged causing partial paralysis/partial or complete loss of muscle function and/or feeling to all four limbs and torso/trunk of the body), high blood pressure, and depression. Resident 10 was able to make needs known. Observations on 03/24/2026 at 9:27 AM, 03/25/2026 at 9:01 AM, 03/26/2026 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care and services were provided according to professional standards of practice for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 106 and 12) when reviewed for respiratory care. Failure to provide oxygen (O2) per provider's order, notify provider when O2 saturation (Sats, measuring the percentage amount of O2 in the blood) were not within ordered parameters, clarify unclear O2 orders, and/or O2 use care planned placed residents at risk for negative outcomes, discomfort, unmet needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Resident 106 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 106 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dependence on renal dialysis (the process of filtering blood to remove waste and excess fluids due to kidney failure), anxiety disorder, and dorsalgia (a group of conditions that produce moderate to intense pain in the muscles, nerves, bones, joints, or other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pain management that met professional standard for 1 of 8 sampled residents (Resident 106) when reviewed for unnecessary medications and/or pain management. Failure to thoroughly complete pain assessments/evaluations and to address any need for non-pharmacological interventions (NPI, health interventions/approaches used instead of medication) with Resident 106, placed the resident at risk of having unmet pain needs, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 106 initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dependence on renal dialysis (the process of filtering blood to remove waste and excess fluids due to kidney failure), anxiety disorder, and dorsalgia (a group of condition that produce moderate to intense pain in the muscles, nerves, bones, joints, or other structures associated with the spinal column/back bone of the body). Resident 106 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure medication and treatments were securely stored for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 96) and 2 of 2 sampled treatment carts (Rose and Emerald Wings). These failures placed residents at risk for access to restricted medications and treatments, avoidable injury, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Medications at Bedside Observation and interview on 03/24/2026 at 9:49 AM showed Resident 96 sitting in their bed in the room, and next to them on the table was a saline laxative enema (water-based procedure that injects liquid directly into anus to induce bowel movements), two medicated inhalers, and a nasal spray. Resident 96 stated they were feeling constipated and would be using the enema that the facility had provided for them. During an interview on 03/27/2026 at 2:11 PM, Resident 96 stated they had not used the enema yet, but had it on standby. During an interview on 03/27/2026 at 2:34 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services (DNS), stated the expectation was for no medications at bedside, and Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide routine dental services for 2 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 1 and 10) reviewed for dental services. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet dental needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included .Resident 10 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 10 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include quadriplegia with incomplete damage to the neck (spinal cord damaged causing partial paralysis/partial or complete loss of muscle function and/or feeling to all four limbs and torso/trunk of the body), high blood pressure, and depression. Resident 10 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 03/24/2026, Resident 10 stated they had a dental exam two or more months ago and were told they had broken upper teeth that needed to be pulled. Resident 10 stated it took longer to chew their food because of it. Review of the dental visit form dated 08/11/2025 showed Resident 10…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to accurately assess and manage the diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF, a weakened heart condition, in which the heart doesn't pump blood as effectively as it should, and causes fluid build-up in the feet, arms, lungs and other organs) for 1 of 3 sample residents (Resident 2) reviewed for the management of CHF. This failure placed the resident at risk for fluid overload, respiratory complications, exacerbation of (worsening of) heart failure, kidney and liver damage, hospitalization, and sudden death. Findings included . Resident 2 admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including CHF and morbid obesity (severe obesity). The electronic health record showed that Resident 2 was alert and oriented, was their own decision-maker, and was able to make their needs known. Review of the hospital Discharge summary, dated [DATE], showed that Resident 2 admitted to the hospital, on 03/30/2025, with a chief complaint of shortness of breath. Resident 2…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide risks/benefits and obtain consent for the use of a psychotropic (affecting the mind) medication for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 72) when reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk of avoidable side effects, chemical restraint, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 72 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include fracture of the spine, quadriplegia (inability to move arms and legs), and depression. Resident 72 was able to make needs known. Review of the current provider orders, Feburary 2025, showed Resident 72 received an antidepressant medication. Review of the EHR showed Resident 72 had not been provided risks/benefits for the use of the antidepressant and had not given consent to receive the antidepressant. During an interview on 02/12/2025 at 1:03 PM, Staff K, Staff Development /Licensed Practical Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate, investigate, and resolve a grievance for 1 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 67) reviewed for personal property and grievances. This failure placed the residents at risk for emotional distress and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 67 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included contracture (reduction in movement) of the right hand, muscle weakness, congestive heart failure (condition that happens when your heart is unable to pump blood well enough to give your body a normal supply) and chronic kidney disease (condition where the kidneys are damaged and unable to filter blood). Resident 67 was able to make needs known. During an interview on 02/07/2025 at 11:55 PM, Resident 67 stated they were unhappy staff came into their room that morning and threw away multiple condiments purchased by a family member. Review of a progress noted, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct an assessment for the use of a low bed for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Residents 39) reviewed for use of physical restraints. This failure placed the resident at risk for injury, unmet needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include hemiplegia (complete loss of strength or paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (mild loss of strength in a leg, arm, or face). Resident 39 was assessed to be a fall risk and required the assistance of staff for mobility. Observation on 02/10/2025 at 11:09 AM and 02/11/2025 at 1:54 PM showed Resident 39 in their room lying on a bed that was lowered to the floor. Review of Resident 39's care plan showed an intervention place bed in low position initiated on 08/27/2022. During an interview on 01/28/2025 at 10:19 AM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and investigate allegations of abuse/neglect for 1 of 7 sampled residents (Resident 56) when reviewed for abuse/neglect. This failure placed the resident at risk of continued abuse/neglect and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse Investigation and Reporting, dated July 2017, showed all reports of resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident property, mistreatment and/or injuries of unknown source (abuse) shall be promptly reported to local, state and federal agencies (as defined by current regulations) and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings of abuse investigations will also be reported. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 08/08/2024, showed Resident 56 admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include muscle weakness, anxiety and depression. The MDS showed Resident 56 was able to make needs…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notification of the reason for hospital transfer to the resident or responsible party for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 291) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the resident at risk for not knowing rights regarding transfer and discharge from the facility and diminished protection from been inappropriately discharged . Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 291 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included polyneuropathy (nerve disorder that affects multiple nerves) and bipolar disorder (condition that causes extreme mood swings). Resident 291 was able to make needs known. Review of Resident 291's EHR showed a transfer to the hospital on [DATE]. The EHR did not show documentation a notice of transfer was provided to Resident 291 or their representative. During an interview on 02/13/2025 at 12:12 PM, Staff B, Director of Nursing Services, stated Resident 291…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written bed hold notice at the time of transfer to the hospital for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 291) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents at risk for lacking knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed while in the hospital and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 291 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included polyneuropathy (nerve disorder that affects multiple nerves) and bipolar disorder (condition that causes extreme mood swings). Resident 291 was able to make needs known. Review of Resident 291's EHR showed a hospitalization on 02/08/2025. The EHR did not show documentation or progress notes that a bed hold was offered to the resident. During an interview on 02/13/2025 at 12:16 PM, Staff R, Business Office Manager, stated the Resident 291 or their resident representative was not offered a bed hold. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete the comprehensive assessment for 3 of 21 sampled residents (Residents 79, 18, and 88) when reviewed for accuracy of comprehensive assessment. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving needed care, a decline in ability, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 79 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 79 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic ulcer of the left thigh and diabetes. Resident 79 was able to make needs known. Review of the admission minimum data set assessment (MDS), an assessment tool, dated 12/31/2024, showed Resident 79 had two pressure ulcers which were not present on admission. During an interview on 02/12/2025 at 12:56 PM, Staff K, Staff Development /Licensed Practical Nurse (SD/LPN), stated Resident 79 admitted to the facility with two pressure ulcers and did not acquire any while in the facility. Staff K stated Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed conduct timely care planning meetings with residents or responsible party for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Residents 31) reviewed for care planning. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet needs, care not provided as directed, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 31 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include respiratory failure (condition in which your blood doesn't have enough oxygen), paraplegia (paralysis or loss of ability to move legs) and depression. Resident 31 was able to make needs known and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. During an interview on 02/11/2025 at 11:21 AM, Resident 31 stated they did not recall having a recent care conference. Review of the EHR showed Resident 31 was last offered a care conference on 06/08/2024. During an interview on 02/12/2025 at 2:59 PM, Staff S, Social Service Director, stated they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0661 — isolatedEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the discharge summary was completed and included recapitulation (overview) of the residents stay, a final summary of the resident's status, and the resident and/or their representative signature for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 88) reviewed for discharge. This failure placed the resident at risk for unsafe discharge, complications and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of policy titled Discharge Summary and Plan, revised December 2016, showed 1. When the facility anticipates a resident's discharge [ .] a discharge summary and a post-discharge plan will be developed [ .]. Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 88 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include multiple sclerosis (disease in which the immune system eats away at the protecting covering of the nerves, resulting in damage in the communication between brain and the body), dementia (disease that affects memory,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the necessary interventions were in place to ensure correct positioning for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 17) when reviewed for positioning and mobility. The facility also failed to consistently monitor and document bowel movements and implement the bowel program as needed for 2 of 4 sampled residents (Residents 4 and 82) reviewed for bowel protocol. These failures placed the residents at risk for worsening conditions, discomfort, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Position/Mobility> Resident 17 Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS), a required assessment tool, dated 01/06/2025, showed Resident 17 admitted on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include heart and lung disease, diabetes, anxiety, depression, and muscle weakness. The electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 17 had a stroke, had a contracture (tightening or lose of movement) of muscle to the left ankle/foot, was able to make their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure care and services to ensure residents increased or maintained range of motion (ROM) were provided for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 67) reviewed for position, range of motion/mobility. This failure placed the residents at risk for worsening mobility, developing of contractures (permanent tightening of muscle, tendons and skin, leading to deformity), and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 67 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included contracture of the right hand (reduced range of motion), muscle weakness, congestive heart failure (condition that happens when your heart is unable to pump blood well enough to give your body a normal supply) and chronic kidney disease (condition where the kidneys are damaged and unable to filter blood). Resident 67 was able to make needs known. Observation and interview on 02/12/2025 at 9:29 AM showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident environments were free from accident hazards for 1 of 3 sampled shower rooms (200 Hall) and failed to ensure fall interventions were implemented for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 67) reviewed for accident hazards. These failures placed residents at risk of having access to dangerous items, repeated falls, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Observations on 02/07/2025, 02/11/2025, and 02/12/2025 showed the shower room on the 200 Hall was unlocked. Observation showed inside the shower room was an electric razor, disposable razors, and nail clippers. During an interview on 02/12/2025 at 12:33 PM, Staff P, Registered Nurse, stated electric razors, disposable razors, and nail clippers were locked in the medication cart as residents were not to have access to these items. Staff P stated the 200 Hall shower room door was unlocked and these items were unsecured within the shower room. During an interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the facility's Registered Dietician's (RD) recommendations were administered as ordered for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 31) and ensure fluid restrictions were followed for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 18 and 82) when reviewed for nutrition/hydration. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet nutritional needs, dehydration, medical complications, and continued weight loss. Findings included . Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 31 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include respiratory failure (condition in which your blood doesn't have enough oxygen or has too much carbon dioxide), paraplegia (paralysis or loss of ability to move legs) and depression. Resident 31 was able to make needs known and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living. Review of a quarterly nutrition note, dated 12/17/2024, from the RD showed Resident 31 had significant weight loss of 10%. RD…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have order and monitor oxygen services to meet professional standards for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 18) reviewed for respiratory services. This failure placed the resident at risk for oxygen toxicity, injury, infection and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of policy titled, Oxygen Administration, revised October 2010, showed 1. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure [ .] 2. Review the resident's care plan [ .]. Review of electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include end stage renal disease (condition where the kidney reaches advanced state of loss of function), acute respiratory failure (condition that results from inadequate gas exchange by the respiratory system), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung disease that blocks airflow and makes it difficult to breathe) and cirrhosis (scarring) of the liver.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff conducted pain assessments for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 9) who received an as necessary pain medication (oxycodone, a narcotic pain medication used to treat moderate to severe pain) when reviewed for pain management. This failure had the potential for the residents to not receive the necessary pain medication as ordered, a diminished quality of life and unmet needs. Findings included . Review of a document titled, Pain Assessment and Management, dated October 2022, showed the purpose of the procedures were to help the staff identify pain in the resident, and to develop interventions consistent with the residents that addressed the underlying causes of pain. The pain management program was based on facility-wide commitment to an appropriate assessment and treatment of pain, on professional standards of practice, and the comprehensive care plan. The facility staff were to assess the resident's pain and to use a consistent…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dialysis (a process to remove waste from blood) care consistent with professional standards for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 18) when reviewed for dialysis care. This failure placed the resident at risk for receiving substandard dialysis care, injury, infection and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the policy titled, Hemodialysis Access Care, revised September 2010, showed The general medical nurse should document in the resident's medical record every shift as follows: 1) Location of catheter 2) Conditions of dressing 3) If dialysis was done during the shift 4) Any part of report from dialysis nurse post-dialysis being given 5) Observations post-dialysis Review of electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include end stage renal disease (condition where the kidney reaches advanced state of loss of function), acute respiratory failure (condition that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an as needed or as the situation demands (PRN) psychotropic medication (drugs that affect the brain and central nervous system, that alter mood, thoughts, emotions and behavior) was limited to 14 days for 1 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 9) when reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure had the potential to place the resident at risk for increased medical complications and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Psychotropic Medication Use, dated July 2022, showed psychotropic medications were not to be prescribed or given on a PRN basis unless that medication was necessary to treat a diagnosed specific condition that was documented in the clinical record. Psychotropic orders were limited to 14 days and if psychotropic medications were prescribed and the attending provider believed that it was appropriate to extend the PRN order beyond 14 days a rationale was to be documented and the appropriateness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide routine dental services for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 18) when reviewed for dental services. Failure to provide routine dental services placed the resident at risk for infection, pain, decrease ability to eat and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 18 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include acute respiratory failure (condition that results from inadequate gas exchange by the respiratory system) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a lung disease that blocks airflow and makes it difficult to breathe). Resident 18 was able to make needs known. Observation and interview and on 02/07/2025 at 11:03 AM, showed Resident 18 with multiple broken teeth. Resident 18 stated, My teeth are broken, and the staff are not doing anything about it. Review of the care plan, dated 11/06/2024, showed Resident 18's broken teeth were not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to help prevent the transmission of communicable diseases. The facility failed to ensure staff: consistently applied Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) in accordance with the Enhanced Barrier Precautions/Transmission Based Precaution (EBP/TBP, implement precautions based on the means of transmission in order to prevent or control infection) signs posted outside of resident rooms for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 47) and consistently ensure respiratory care equipment (an aerosol machine and oxygen tubing) were stored in a clean and sanitary manner for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 18) when reviewed for infection control. These failures placed residents and staff at risk for contracting and/or spreading infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of a document titled, Personal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-29 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely refund charges paid (less what was owed to the facility) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 2) reviewed for misappropriation and personal funds. This failed practice placed the prior resident at risk of financial instability with their current housing placement and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 2> Review of Resident 2's electronic health record census showed they admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident 2 discharged to an Adult Family Home in the community on 11/22/2023. Review of Resident 2's Credit Statement, dated 11/01/2024, showed Resident 2 was due a credit in the amount of $4,363.44 on 11/05/2024, 11 months after they discharged (and still not issued). In an interview on 10/29/2024 at 12:09 PM, Staff E, Business Office Manager, stated Resident 2 discharged from the facility on 11/22/2023 with a zero balance but over-payments were made after Resident 2 discharged . Staff E was unable to locate documentation to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 sampled residents (Residents 6) with urinary catheters (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) and bowel incontinence received care and services consistent with professional standards of care. The failure to obtain physician orders for the use of a catheter, develop/implement a care plan (CP) for catheter care/monitoring and a personalized bowel program, placed the residents at risk for infections, skin breakdown, constipation, and diminished quality of care. Findings included . <Facility Policy> Review of the facility's Bowel (Lower Gastrointestinal Tract) Disorders-Clinical Protocol, revised September 2017, showed staff would assess residents with previously identified bowel disorders which should include reviewing documentation from any recent hospitalizations and/or diagnostic studies. Risk factors related to bowel dysfunction would be identified and monitored. Review of the facility's Catheter Care,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and homelike environment in 1 of 2 units (Rose unit-100 Hall and 300 Hall) and 1 of 3 shower rooms (300 Hall) for 3 sampled Residents (Resident 9, 36, & 52) plus 5 supplemental Residents (Residents 7, 13, 57, 60 & 77) reviewed for environment. The failure to ensure walls, wallpaper, privacy cubical curtains, doors/door handles, window coverings, resident rooms, shower equipment, linen cart covers, and wheelchairs were sanitary, clean, odor-free, and in good repair placed residents at risk for infections, accidents, injuries, medical complications, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . WHEELCHAIRS <Resident 52> Observations on 04/08/2024 at 11:10 AM, 04/09/2024 at 8:00 AM, and 04/10/2024 at 11:30 AM, and 04/11/2024 at 1:16 PM of Resident 52's wheelchair appeared to be unclean with dirt, dander and/or debris that resembled dried spilled food. <Resident 60> Observations on 04/08/2024 at 11:12 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 7 of 20 sampled residents (Residents 27, 88, 6, 9, 51, 69, and 72) whose minimum data sets (MDS, a required assessment tool) were reviewed. The failure to accurately assess the residents care needs directly affected the ability to develop a comprehensive care plan that met the residents care needs and placed them at risk for further unmet needs, inaccurate medical records, medical complications,and diminished quality of care/quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 27> During an interview on 04/08/2024 at 12:05 PM, Resident 27 stated they had fallen out of bed one time. Review of Resident 27's electronic health record (EHR) showed the resident readmitted to the facility on [DATE] and was able to make needs known. Review of the facility's incident reporting log dated November 2023 showed that Resident 27 had incidents of falls logged for falls on 11/17/2023 and 11/21/2023. Review of Resident 27's quarterly MDS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop, implement, and/or update person-centered comprehensive care plans (CP) and ensure the appropriate CP information for direct care staff carried over to the Kardex (bed-side CP direct care staff depend on to provide person-centered care) for 6 of 20 residents (Residents 55, 70, 13, 52, 6, and 69) reviewed for comprehensive CPs. These failures placed the residents at risk for poor clinical outcomes, lack of services, unmet care needs, medical complications, diminished quality of care/quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 55> Review of the 03/18/2024 admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-assessment tool) showed Resident 55 they admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnosis of depression. Review of the physicians' order (PO), dated 03/13/2024 showed Resident 55 was to receive an anti-depressant medication to treat their depression, starting on 03/14/2024. Review of Resident 55's comprehensive CP showed no care plan in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure services provided met professional standards of practice for anti-hypertensive medication administration, orthostatic vital signs, physician orders, insulin administration, injection site rotation for injections, weight monitoring, edema monitoring, and care of patients with heart failure for 9 of 20 sampled residents (Residents 70, 73, 47, 16, 51, 52, 6, 36, and 69) reviewed. These failures placed residents at risk of unmet needs, medical complications, injuries, and diminished quality of care/quality of life. Findings included . ANTI-HYPERTENSIVE MEDICATION PARAMETERS (Residents 16 & 69): POLICY Review of the facility's Standing Physician Orders, dated 09/01/2022, provided by the Medical Director to be used for the care of residents when needed, and unless otherwise specified. The document showed any of the orders could be implemented following an appropriate nursing assessment of the patient and initiation of a PO for physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0800 — patternProvide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide food that accommodated identified resident preferences for 4 of 20 Residents (Residents 3, 62, 301, and 91) reviewed for food preferences. This failure placed residents at risk for weight loss, malnutrition, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . During an interview on 04/08/2024 at 12:35 PM, Resident 22 stated they disliked tomatoes, but the facility still served them tomato soup. During an interview on 04/09/2024 at 10:18 AM, Resident 6 said, They asked me what I like and don't like, but then serve me what i don't like, so I have them take it back. During an interview on 04/09/2024 at 9:41 AM, Resident 72 stated sometimes preferences for food choices were not followed, they had a pineapple allergy and were served pineapple. Resident 72 said they didn't eat because they were concerned the pineapple may have touched other food. <BREAKFAST TRAY LINE> <Resident 3> Review of Resident 3's breakfast tray card showed one banana identified as a breakfast preference. Observation of the breakfast…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure preplanned menus were followed and the appropriate portion sizes were served according to the tray card for 3 of 20 Residents (Resident 75, 76, and 92) reviewed for dietary services. These failures placed residents at risk for decreased/increased caloric intake, nutritional deficits, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the preplanned breakfast menu for 04/11/2024 showed toast, scrambled eggs, ham, 2% milk, juice, and fruit. Observation of the breakfast tray line on 04/11/2024 at 7:25 AM showed Staff H, Cook, plated a donut, scrambled eggs, and a slice of ham for the general diet and low-fat milk was added to the tray. When asked about the preplanned menu, Staff H stated they ran out of bread and 2% milk so they decided to serve donuts and low-fat milk as the alternative. <Resident 75> Review of Resident 75's breakfast tray card showed double portions. Observation of the breakfast tray line on 04/11/2024 at 7:28 AM showed Staff H served Resident 75 one donut, one scoop of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure food was prepared and served according to in accordance with professional standards. These failures placed residents at risk of foodborne illness and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <FIRST KITCHEN OBSERVATION> An observation on 04/08/2024 at 10:19 AM showed three packages of partially thawed ground beef, an uncovered and unlabeled container of cheese sauce, and an open can of a Named Brand Energy drink on the prep table. During an interview on 04/08/2024 at 10:25 AM, Staff G, Dietary Manager (DM), stated the ground beef thawing on the counter, uncovered and unlabeled food and personal drinks on the counter did not meet expectations. <TEMPERATURES> An observation on 04/11/2024 at 7:50 AM, showed Staff H, Cook, added a large pitcher of hot water from the coffee maker to the oatmeal on the steam table. Observation showed no temperature was taken. An observation on 04/11/2024 at 8:11 AM showed Staff H take a tray of ham from the oven and put it on the steam table. Observation showed no temperature was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0847 — patternInform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include documentation of the Arbitration (a procedure used to settle a dispute using an independent person mutually agreed upon by both parties) Agreement to the resident and/or representative for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 81, 87, 73 and 66), reviewed for Arbitration Agreement. This failure placed the residents at risk of losing legal protections, forfeiture (loss or giving up of something) of the right to a jury or court, lack of understanding of the legal document signed, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of a facility's admission Agreement for Skilled Nursing Facilities, admission Agreement (AA)packet, dated May 2017, showed in section 9.1: Attachments / Arbitration Agreement: The Center offers the Resident Group [resident or resident representative] the option of signing an Arbitration Agreement. The Resident Group acknowledges receiving a copy of the Arbitration Agreement, being informed orally of the content of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0848 — patternProvide a neutral and fair arbitration process and agree to arbitrator and venue.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to include documentation of the Arbitration (a procedure used to settle a dispute using an independent person mutually agreed upon by both parties) Agreement to the resident and/or representative for 4 of 4 residents (Resident 81, 87, 73 and 66), reviewed for Arbitration Agreement. This failure placed the residents at risk of losing legal protections, forfeiture (loss or giving up of something) of the right to a jury or court, lack of understanding of the legal document signed, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of a facility document titled, admission Agreement for Skilled Nursing Facilities, dated May 2017 showed section 9.1: Attachments / Arbitration Agreement. The Center offers the Resident Group [resident or resident representative] the option of signing an Arbitration Agreement. The Resident Group acknowledges receiving a copy of the Arbitration Agreement, being informed orally of the content of the Arbitration Agreement…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program to prevent the transmission of communicable diseases and infections by completing the collection and analyzation of infection control data, identifying trends, and completing follow-up activities in response to those trends for 2 of 3 months (February and March 2024) reviewed for Infection Control. The facility also failed to implement isolation precautions for 1 of 2 wings (Rose wing) reviewed for transmission-based precautions. These failures placed residents and staff at risk for communicable diseases and infections, poor clinical outcomes, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Tracking and Trending> Review of the facility policy titled Infection Control, revised October 2018, showed the surveillance for infections would identify both individual cases and trends to guide appropriate interventions and prevent future infections based on current standards. It showed that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective Antibiotic Stewardship Program, to promote appropriate use of antibiotics, reduce the risk of unnecessary antibiotic use and decrease the development of adverse side effects and antibiotic resistance for 4 of 7 residents (Residents 69, 304, 56 and 305) reviewed for antibiotic stewardship. This failure placed residents at risk for potential adverse outcomes associated with the inappropriate and/or unnecessary use of antibiotics. Findings included . Resident 69 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 69 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnose of infected amputation stump. Review of the laboratory report dated 06/24/2023 showed the resident had a urinary tract infection (UTI) and identified e-choli (a bacteria) extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) which was resistant to multiple antibiotics (MDRO) and also identified proteus mirabilis (a bacteria) which was not resistant to antibiotics. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had access to their money during evenings and weekends for 1 of 37 sampled residents (Resident 36) reviewed for personal funds. This failure placed residents at risk for decreased autonomy (independence), dishonored residents rights, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . During an interview on 04/09/2024 at 12:56 PM, Resident 36 stated they did not have a lock box and had to keep funds in their room because they did not have access to personal funds after business hours. Review of Resident 36's financial Trial Balance statement, dated 04/08/2024, showed Resident 36 had a monthly deposit allowance of $45.36 and an available balance total of $407.18. During an interview on 04/10/2024 at 1:53 PM, Staff D, Business Office Manager, stated residents did not have access to personal funds after hours. During an interview on 04/12/2024 at 1:09 PM Staff A, Administrator, stated residents did not have access to personal funds after hours (due to a recent petty cash audit) like they should, which did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews the facility failed to protect the resident's right to personal privacy for 2 of 4 Residents (Resident 52 and 69) reviewed for dignity. The failure to provide privacy and maintain dignity during the provision of personal cares and wound treatment for Resident 52 and for Resident 69 placed the residents at risk for embarrassment, frustration, and undignified quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 52> During an observation on 04/09/2024 at 9:34 AM, Resident 52 was seated in their wheelchair facing the doorway. The door was not closed and the privacy curtain was not pulled to provide privacy during care. Staff T, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), was observed re-arranging Resident 52's shirt and exposed Resident 52's left breast which was observed from the hallway. In an interview on 04/09/2024 at 9:41 AM, Staff T stated they tried to shut the door, but the door did not have a doorknob and would not stay closed. Staff T stated they pulled the curtain but must not have pulled the curtain far enough to provide privacy. <Resident 69> During a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews, and record review the facility failed to timely identify (or should have identified) a significant change is status for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 6) reviewed for change of condition. The failure to conduct a Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) within 14 days of the determination of a resident's significant change in status placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs, diminished quality of care/quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 6> During an observation and interview on 04/09/2024 at 10:13 AM, Resident 6 was observed lying in their bed, the shades closed, and the room very dark. Resident 6 stated they were aware they had gained a considerable amount of weight which they contributed to their food choices, their loss of mobility and independence, their body altering leg amputation, pain, and lack of motivations/loss of interest in doing anything. Resident 6 stated before they came to this facility, they could walk, and they were continent of bladder. Resident 6 stated they disliked living in a nursing facility, felt like…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review the facility failed to conduct timely/routine care planning conferences with the resident and/or responsible party for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 63, 72 and 78) reviewed for care conferences. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet needs, not being involved and/or informed of their care plan (CP), and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 63> Review of the 03/20/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-assessment tool) showed Resident 63 readmitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnoses included a brain injury caused by lack of oxygen, and dysphasia (a condition that affects the ability to speak and/or understand spoken language). Resident 63 was usually able to make their needs known. In an interview on 04/08/2024 at 2:23 PM, Resident 63's Responsible Party stated they did not recall when an actual care conference was conducted or what their CP was. Review of Resident 63's electronic health record (EHR) on 04/09/2024 showed the last time a care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide the care and assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) they required to maintain good grooming, oral hygiene, and toileting for 2 of 6 Residents (Residents 52 and 69) plus 2 supplemental residents (Resident 60 and 7) reviewed for ADLs. These failures placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, poor oral health, skin impairment, medical complications, and diminished quality of life/quality of care. Findings included . <Resident 52> Review of the 03/12/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-assessment tool) showed Resident 52 was dependent on staff for eating, oral hygiene, toileting, personal hygiene, and transfers. Resident 52 was assessed to be always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Resident 52 received feeding through a stomach tube and had no dental problems. Review of Resident 52's [NAME] on 04/08/2024 showed Resident 52 required extensive toileting assistance by staff, staff were directed to turn and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observations, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were provided resident-centered activity programs that incorporated their interests, hobbies, and cultural preferences for 1 of 2 Residents (Resident 52) plus 3 supplemental Residents (Residents 60, 57, and 7) reviewed for activities. The failure to provide independent and/or community activities that met each resident's physical, mental, and psychosocial needs placed residents at risk for social isolation, boredom, decreased sense of security/identity/meaning, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 52> Review of the 03/12/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-assessment tool) showed Resident 52 was assessed to have adequate hearing, unclear speech, usually made themselves understood, and usually understood others. Resident 52 had moderate vision impairment without corrective lenses and diagnoses included brain injury from lack of oxygen, dementia, and anxiety. Resident 52 has no behaviors or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide an environment free of accidents/hazards for 3 of 9 residents (Residents 13, 66, and 27) and 2 of 2 smoking areas (on the property and on the street sidewalk-adjacent to the facility property) reviewed for accidents. The failure to re-assess Residents 13 and 66 after unsafe smoking incidents and provide adequate supervision and/or assistance for smoking safety compliance, equally enforce the facility smoking policy for all residents, visitors, and staff; ensure smoking receptacles were available for safe and sanitary collection of cigarette refuse; and ensure a re-assessment and care plan (CP) update occurred for Resident 27 after a fall. These failures placed the residents at risk for further accidents, smoking related injuries, unsanitary environment, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . SMOKING <POLICY> Review of the facility's admission Agreement Packet, Notice of Smoke-Free Center Policy, revised November…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure 2 of 3 residents (Residents 69 and 70) with urinary catheters (a flexible tube inserted into the bladder to drain urine) received care and services consistent with professional standards of care. The failure to ensure routine catheter care was provided, and the catheters were properly secured and positioned placed the residents at risk for infections, skin breakdown, discomfort, and diminished quality of care. Findings included . <Resident 69> Review of the 03/01/2024 Annual Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS-assessment tool) showed Resident 69 diagnoses included paraplegia, an amputation of the left lower leg, urine retention (condition where the bladder is unable to empty all the urine), and a multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO). Resident 69 required the use of a foley catheter and was dependent on staff for toileting care. Review of the elimination care plan (CP), revised 03/20/2024, showed: an intervention (revised…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure staff provided pain medication as ordered for 1 of 4 Residents (Resident 73) reviewed for pain. The failure administer a routinely scheduled anti-inflammatory analgesic (a medication to reduce swelling and pain) and accurately document the provision of acetaminophen (a mild analgesic that has potential for medical complications when taken in excess) in the clinical record placed the resident at risk for delay in care and services to treat their chronic pain condition, potential for acetaminophen toxicity, medical complications, and diminished quality of care/quality of life. Findings included . POLICY Review of the facility's Pain-Clinical Protocol policy, dated March 2020, showed the provider and staff would identify residents who had pain, conduct a pain assessment, and provide treatment to relieve pain. The pain management protocol showed staff would evaluate and report the residents use of scheduled medication and PRN (as needed) medication usage. If there were more than occasional analgesic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate hemodialysis (HD, a process in which blood is filtered of waste, toxins and fluid) services for 1 of 1 Residents (Resident 66) reviewed for dialysis. The facility failed to provide consistent monitoring of the dialysis documentation of communication, to the dialysis unit, to inform them of pertinent clinical information. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet care needs, medical complications, and diminished quality of care. Findings included . POLICY Review of the facility's Nursing Home Dialysis Transfer Agreement policy, dated 05/16/2013, showed the facility and the HD Center would provide each other with the necessary health information to ensure the residents received the care and services they required related to their kidney disease. The facility would ensure all appropriate medical, social, and administrative information regarding the resident would be communicated to the HD Center at the time of transfer. <Resident 66> Review of the 04/04/2024 Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS-assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Influenza and Pneumococcal vaccines for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 55 and 70) reviewed for vaccinations. This failure placed the residents at a higher risk for contracting influenza and pneumococcal infections, related complications, and a decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 55 Review of Resident 55's electronic health record (EHR) showed the resident admitted on [DATE]. A signed consent form was located in the medical record that listed influenza, and pneumococcal vaccines, there was no indication if the resident consented or declined the vaccines. Review of the administration record showed the vaccines had not been administered. Resident 70 Review of Resident 70's EHR showed the resident admitted on [DATE], a signed consent form which indicated the resident consented to the influenza vaccine was located in the medical record dated 08/04/2023. Also, a signed consent form for the pneumococcal vaccine was located, it did…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-12 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer and follow-up on the completion of COVID-19 immunizations for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 55 and 70) reviewed for vaccinations. This failure placed the residents at an increased risk for complications related to COVID-19 infection that could result in severe illness or death. Findings included . Review of Resident 55's electronic health record (EHR) showed the resident admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of heart disease, presence of a pacemaker and asthma. There was no record of the resident receiving the Covid-19 vaccine prior to admission. A signed consent form dated 03/14/2024 was located in the medical record that listed the Covid-19 vaccine, there was no indication if the resident consented or declined the vaccine. Further review showed no record of the residents Covid-19 vaccination status and that the vaccine had not been administered since admission. Review of Resident 70's EHR showed the resident admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-13 · tag F0660 — widespreadPlan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement an effective, personalized discharge plan for 6 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 1, 10, 11, 13, 14, & 15) reviewed for discharge planning. The facility failed to: ensure the discharge needs of each resident were identified,; the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) involved the resident/responsible party to develop a personalized discharge care plan based on each resident's needs, goals, & preferences,; provide timely referrals to the LCA for residents who desired to discharge to the community,; and ensure the Home Health Agency (HHA) was provided all required documents to start services and issued a preliminary start date. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs after discharge, potential for re-hospitalization, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . <POLICY> Review of the facility's policy, Discharge Process and Planning, revised December 2016, showed the IDT team would evaluate each resident for their discharge needs and develop an individualized post-discharge plan with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0661 — widespreadEnsure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents experienced a smooth transition during their discharge, received medications and post-discharge care and services timely for 6 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 1, 10, 11, 13, 14, & 15) reviewed for discharge planning. The facilities failure to: prepare a complete discharge summary that included a recapituation of the resdient's stay with all required components, a complete final summary of the resident's status, a reconciliation of all pre-discharge and post-discharge medications, and ensure a discharge plan of care was implemented, documented, and provided to the Resident and/or Responsible Party placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs, potential for re-hospitalization, and diminshed quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy, Preparing a Resident for Transfer or Discharge, revised December 2016, showed nursing services would: obtain POs for discharge including the recommended discharge care, services, and equipment the resident required; prepare the discharge summary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide or arrange for care and services consistent with accepted standards of quality for 3 of 6 sampled residents (Residents 2, 18, & 20) reviewed for change of condition and tube feeding. The facility's failure to develop and implement a care plan to meet resident specific care needs; identify, document, and timely notify the appropriate parties of a change of condition; timely implement Physician Orders (POs); and ensure documentation was accurate and complete placed the residents at risk of diminished quality of care, unmet care needs, and potential for significant medical complications. Findings included . Review of the facility's Acute Condition Changes-Clinical Protocol policy, revised March 2018, showed to assess and recognize a change in condition, the nurse would conduct and document a baseline assessment of the resident's vital signs, pain, neurological status, most recent labs, active diagnoses, and all current medications. Direct care staff would be trained in recognizing subtle but significant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-12-13 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure resident's medical records were complete, accurately documented, readily accessible, and systematically organized according to professional standards of practice for 5 of 5 residents (Residents 20, 1, 2, 11, & 14) reviewed for medical records. These failures placed the residents at risk for significant medication errors, unmet care needs, delayed response to changes of condition, and diminished quality of care/quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 20> Review of the hospital Discharge summary dated [DATE] showed Resident 20 was allergic to ceftriaxone (Rocephin). Review of the facility admission orders dated 10/24/2023 showed Resident 20's allergy was cephalexin (Keflex). Review of Resident 20's facility Nursing admission Evaluation dated 10/24/2023 showed Resident 20 was allergic to cephalexin, and the relevant history and diagnoses sections of the assessment were blank and not completed. In an interview on 11/29/2023 at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately inform the resident, physicians, and resident representative of a significant change of condition for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 20) reviewed for change of condition. This failure placed residents at risk of potential life-threatening clinical complications, psychosocial harm, and diminished quality of care/quality of life. Findings included . According to the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guideline on the Management of Patients with Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Executive Summary, dated March 21, 2017 (Volume 135, Issue 12), a comprehensive treatment plan to achieve intact skin and a functional foot included coordinated efforts with vascular medical specialists. To minimize further tissue loss, prompt recognition of foot infection through daily inspections was necessary especially for patients who had diabetes and peripheral neuropathy. Foot infections were to be suspected in patients with pain or tenderness to the area, redness or swelling around the wound, any…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure care and services were provided according to resident's needs, physician orders (POs), and professional standards of practice for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 2 & 18) reviewed for tube feeding. The facility's failure to: follow POs for tube feeding administration to ensure the resident received the ordered amount of formula, ensure POs were in place to monitor and document the frequency and volume of water flushes for medication administrations, ensure the total volume of formula was accurately documented to monitor daily intake of calorie needs, and ensure formula and water tubing/containers were properly labeled placed the residents at risk of potential illness, weight loss, altered nutritional status, and diminished quality of care/quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 2> In an interview on 11/29/2023 at 3:30 pm, Resident 2 stated their tube feeding was not started as ordered on 11/09/2023 and they reported it to the nurse on 11/10/2023. The nurse started their tube feeding and it ran…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-25 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and/or resident representative, written information that specified the facility's bed-hold policy, including the Washington State specific bed-hold periods, rights to return to the facility, and bed-hold facility rates before and at the time of transfer to the hospital for 6 of 6 residents (Residents 1, 4, 9, 10, 11, and 12) reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the residents and their representatives at risk of not being informed of their right to return and resume residence at the facility after hospitalization. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy,Bed-Holds and Returns, revised March 2017, showed prior to transfers or therapeutic leaves, the facility would provide written notification of the facility bed-hold and return policy to each resident/resident representative prior to transfers or therapeutic leaves. The notification would include the resident rights and limitations regarding bed-holds and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive care plan that addressed the risk for pressure injury for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for pressure injury. This failure placed the resident at risk for unmet needs, reoccurrence of a pressure injury, development of new pressure injuries, complications, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy and procedures titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered, revised December 2016 indicated that the interdisciplinary team, in conjunction with the resident and the resident's representative was expected to develop and implement a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident. The policy and procedures further showed care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. Review of Resident 1's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a required assessment tool) dated 06/13/2023 showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2026-03-30 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the daily nurse staffing data in a prominent place to include actual hours worked for 6 of 6 observed days during the survey period (03/23/2026 - 03/30/2026) reviewed for nurse staff posting. This failed practice prevented residents, family members and visitors from knowing the facility's actual number of available nursing staff. Findings included.Observations on 03/23/2026 at 10:00 AM showed the front entrance, receptionist desk, and lobby areas with no daily nurse staffing data posted. Observations on 03/24/2026 at 9:30 AM, 03/25/2026 at 8:50 AM, 03/26/2026 at 10:41 AM, 03/27/2026 at 9:07 AM, and 03/30/2026 at 8:33 AM showed the daily nurse staff data postings with no actual nursing staff hours documented, located on a window to the right of the staffing scheduler's office door, after walking through the front entrance and then taking a right towards the [NAME] Wing nurses' station. If a person were to take a left towards the Emerald Wing nurses' station, they would not have been able to view the daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · Ccited before2025-02-13 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to post the actual nursing staffing hours daily for 30 of 30 days when reviewed for nurse staff posting. This failure prevented the residents, family members, and visitors from exercising their rights to know the actual numbers of available nursing staff in the facility. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers, dated August 2022, showed the facility would post daily for each shift nurse staffing data, including the number of nursing personnel responsible for providing direct care to residents. The information recorded on the form would include the following: the name of the facility, the actual time worked during that shift for each category and type of nursing staff. Observation and record review on 02/13/2025 at 8:45 AM showed the nursing staff posting, located in the facility's main hallway area, was dated 02/13/2025, did not document the name of the facility, nor the actual adjustments were documented that reflected the nursing staff absences on each shift…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$382,661 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $89,440 — penalty dated 2026-03-30
- $153,010 — penalty dated 2024-03-27
- $107,955 — penalty dated 2023-12-13
- $32,256 — penalty dated 2023-10-25
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-06-27 for 30 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HEARTWOOD OPERATOR HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/01/2020 |
| HEARTWOOD REALTY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2020 |
| HEARTWOOD REALTY HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 04/01/2020 |
| PACIFIC NORTHWEST CONSULTING HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2020 |
| CH HEARTWOOD WASHINGTON HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 03/03/2025 |
| HEARTWOOD WASHINGTON CARE OPERATIONS HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | NO PERCENTAGE PROVIDED | since 04/01/2020 |
| STOUT, CHRISTINA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2020 |
| COUVE HEALTHCARE CONSULTING LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/16/2025 |
| HEARTWOOD EVERGREEN HEALTHCARE LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2020 |
| HEARTWOOD OPERATOR LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2020 |
| VERITAS HEALTH SOLUTIONS LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/18/2025 |
| HENRY, CATLIN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2020 |
| HERZKA, YISROEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2020 |
| KOPELOWITZ, SHAUL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2020 |
| LEMMA, WENDWESEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2020 |
| WISE, GINNETTE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2020 |
| YENOWITZ, YITZCHOK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/01/2020 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505326. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.