Tacoma Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 60 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 47.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 36 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 4% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 104.1 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 46 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.89 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.80 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.10 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-06 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement their Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy and procedures and to act timely to ensure residents were free from sexual abuse and mistreatment for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 1, 2 & 3) reviewed for abuse. This caused harm to Resident 1 when they experienced being inappropriately touched in a sexual manner without their consent. This failure placed residents at risk for sexual and physical abuse, psychological harm, feeling uncomfortable and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy entitled, Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, undated, defined sexual abuse as any type of non-consensual sexual contact with a resident. Review of the 12/26/2023 quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment, dated 12/26/2023, showed Resident 1 was alert and oriented, had no memory problems or behaviors, required assistance with toileting care/hygiene and was incontinent. Review of Resident 1's Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care plan, dated 10/18/2023, showed they required one person to help…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to use measured spoons when serving and provide foods listed on the menu for 2 of 2 sampled days (06/17/2026 and 06/22/2026) reviewed for kitchen. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving reduced portions, receiving inadequate nutrition, avoidable weight loss, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Observation on 06/17/2026 at 11:33 AM showed Staff M, Dietary Manager, was serving rice with a gray handled scoop, vegetable medley with a green handled scoop, and carrots (the alternative to the vegetable medley) with an unmeasured silver slotted spoon. Review of the menu for 06/17/2026 lunch showed a half cup of vegetable medley, a half cup of rice, and did not show carrots included as an alternate. Review showed that residents with soft and bite size, minced, and pureed diets received altered rice. Review showed chocolate cake with peanut butter was to be served for dessert. Observation on 06/17/2026 at 12:29 PM showed the facility served cinnamon apples (the previous day's lunch dessert) for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was safely stored and prepared and dishes were sanitarily washed when reviewed for kitchen. This failure placed residents at risk of consuming contaminated foods, foodborne illness, a decline in condition, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Observation on 06/16/2026 at 8:57 AM showed the dry storage area had a canned food rack with one dented can of mandarin oranges and two dented cans of apples. Observation on 06/16/2026 at 9:01 AM showed the kitchen handwashing sink had a trash can with a lid that was not operatable via foot. Observation showed the lid needed to be lifted by hand to dispose of used paper towels. Observation on 06/17/2026 at 11:17 AM showed the facility's walk-in freezer showed 10 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and freezer items such as small single serve ice cream and hot dogs buns were soft to the touch and not frozen. Observation on 06/17/2026 at 11:20 AM showed Staff M, Dietary Manager, completed hand hygiene and carried a used paper towel across to the kitchen to a trash can with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, the facility failed to ensure all planned and provided services were included in residents plans of care for 2 of 19 sampled residents (Residents 34 and 9) reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Failure to include Resident 34's denture use and Residents 34 and 9's oxygen use placed residents at risk of unprovided care, decline in clinical condition, and diminished quality of life. Findings included .Resident 34 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 34 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, lung disease that causes restricted airflow and breathing problems), diabetes (high blood sugar), and anxiety disorder. Resident 34 was able to make needs known. Review of the quarterly minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] showed Resident 34 received oxygen (O2) therapy and had broken or loosely fitting full or partial dentures. <Dentures> During an interview on 06/16/2026 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-22 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide oxygen therapy and hearing support in accordance with professional standards for 2 of 19 sampled residents (Residents 47 and 5) reviewed for quality of care. These failed practices placed the residents at risk for unmet needs and an inaccurate medical record. Findings included . Resident 5 Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 5 readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include anxiety disorder, personal history of other diseases of the respiratory system, and anemia (lack of healthy red blood cells to carry adequate oxygen to the body). Resident 5 was able to make needs known. Observations on 06/16/2026 at 12:07 PM and 06/17/2026 at 12:53 PM showed Resident 5 had an oxygen concentrator (medical device that provides supplemental oxygen) hooked to a nasal canula (devise used to deliver oxygen through a tube into the nose) in their room not in use. During an interview on 06/16/2026 at 12:07 PM,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-22 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure prompt dental services were provided for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 114) reviewed for dental services. This failure placed the resident at risk for continued dental problems and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 114 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include heart failure, diabetes (the body's inability to regulate blood sugar), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Resident 114 was able to make needs known. During an interview and observation on 06/16/2026 at 1:03 PM, Resident 114 stated they would like to have dentures because they had no teeth and staff were aware; however, they still had no dentures. Resident 114 had no upper or lower teeth and no visible dentures in their room. Review of the annual minimum data set assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] showed Resident 114 had no natural teeth or tooth fragments. Review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-06-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow infection control practices related to enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, infection control measures used in nursing homes to prevent the spread of resistant organisms) and hand hygiene for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 12) when reviewed for activities of daily living and catheter (thin flexible tube inserted into the body to withdraw urine). These failures placed the residents at risk of infection, preventable illness, and diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the electronic health record (EHR) showed Resident 12 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include heart failure, end of life care (hospice), and compression fracture in the lumbar (low back) area. Resident 12 was able to communicate needs. <Enhanced Barrier Precautions> Review of the care plan, initiated on 01/19/2026, showed Resident 12 was to have EBP (staff to wear gown and gloves [PPE, personal protective equipment] when…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY . Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse. Resident 1 experienced harm when staff failed to implement and comply with facility abuse prohibition and social media policies that violated their right to privacy and resulted in substantiated mental abuse. This failed practice also placed residents at risk for humiliation, resident-to-resident altercations, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation policy, undated, showed the facility would provide protections for the health, welfare, and rights of each resident by developing and implementing their abuse prohibition policy and procedures. The policy showed possible indicators of abuse included verbal abuse of a resident overheard, psychological abuse of a resident observed, and evidence or photographs/videos of a resident that are demeaning or humiliating in nature, regardless of whether…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-20 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure 3 of 5 staff (Staff E, R, and G) immdiately reported abusive violations to the State Agency (SA) and facility administration. This failure placed residents at risk for abuse, potential for harm, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility Inicident Report (IR) dated 06/18/2024, showed Staff C, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA), filmed two unauthorized videos of Resident 1 on their personal cellular device and posted the videos on a social media site. The first video showed Staff C lie to Resident 1 about another resident hitting them and encouraging Resident 1 to go beat the other resident up. In the video, Staff C used Resident 1's name and vulgar language. The second video showed Resident 1 lying on their bed, and Staff C asked Resident 1 how it felt to go viral. The IR conclusion substantiated abuse ocurred and that Staff E, CNA, and Staff F, CNA, failed to timely report the violations to the SA and facility administration. Review of the faciltiy IR witness statement by Staff E,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure 2 of 2 medication storage room refrigerators were secured (Medication Rooms Front and Back) when reviewed for medication storage. In addition, the facility failed to ensure diagnostic testing medication (PPD, purified protein derivative - a diagnostic skin test used to detect tuberculosis) were stored and dated properly. The facility failed to ensure the medication storage rooms were free of staff personal belongings, food, and drink. These failures had the potential for access to unsecured narcotics, an increased risk of drug diversion, and residents/staff to receive an expired diagnostic medication. Findings included . A document titled, Medication Storage, undated, showed that it was the facility's policy to ensure all medications housed on the premises would be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to the manufacture's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security. All drugs and biologicals…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-03-28 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
  Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident 45 Resident 45 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs), respiratory failure (when the lungs can't get enough oxygen into the blood) and muscle weakness. During an interview on 03/25/2024 at 11:03 AM, Resident 45 stated they continued to be served foods that were on their dislike list. Resident 45 gave the example that they did not like pork; however, they had been served ham and bacon. Observation and review of Resident 45's breakfast tray on 03/27/2024 at 8:31 AM showed a slice of wheat toast, yogurt, milk, cranberry juice, and scrambled eggs and the tray card showed Dislikes and listed Fish group, Pork Group, Peas, Vegetables, Milk, OJ and scrambled eggs. During an interview on 03/27/2024 at 10:54 AM, Resident 45 said, I got scrambled eggs again for breakfast. Not sure why they ask my preferences if they are not going to listen. It is frustrating. It…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$36,446 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $36,446 — penalty dated 2024-03-06

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 8 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 86% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA