No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Parkside Care

308 West Emma, Union Gap, WA 98903 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 88 certified beds · (509) 248-1985 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Mar 2026Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0568, F0569, F0570)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$205,277 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0568, F0569, F0570)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (63) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $205,277 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-23)
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 1 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1211 Ahtanum Ridge Drive
Pharmacy
Costco1.2 mi
2310 Longfibre Rd · (509) 454-5242 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
2425 Longfibre Rd · (509) 317-7630 · Call to confirm hours
Park
3607 4th St · (509) 225-3524 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3412 S 1st St · (509) 833-8851

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 1 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 2 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.3%14.2%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.2%5.5%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder2.3%1.0%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection5.4%1.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms5.9%17.7%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.6%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication37.8%12.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine98.0%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.0%4.3%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.4%22.5%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table25.0%15.1%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.4%1.3%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.2%19.9%22.6%typical
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit21.5%13.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.971.331.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.151.521.80worse

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 110 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

38.0%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
29.4%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.30U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 29.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 34 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 49% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF38.0%CMS range 30.7–45.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024worse than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 7.2–14.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge29.4%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge38.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge29.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge79.3%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.6–10.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.991.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.72
RN hours/ resident / day
0.80
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.36
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.88
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.45
RN hoursweekends
Total nursing turnover
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 52.2 residents a day — about 59% occupied, or roughly 36 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.88 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.72 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.36 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.83 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-23)
20
at the previous standard inspection (2025-02-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

63 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 49 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · L2024-10-21 · tag F0837 — widespread
    Establish a governing body that is legally responsible for establishing and implementing policies for managing and operating the facility and appoints a properly licensed administrator responsible for managing the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the Governing Body failed to ensure financial systems were in place to pay facility vendors who supplied essential care, services and/or necessary supplies for the residents. The facility staff had to resort to utilizing their own funds for the vendor payments which placed the residents at risk of not having necessary supplies,care and services, and potential psychological harm and distress due to the fear of becoming displaced in the event the facility was unable to meet their basic and immediate care needs.The lack of a reliable financial system was determined to be an immediate jeopardy. On 10/15/2024, the facility was notified of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) at F837 §483.70(d)(1), Governing Body, when the Governing Body failed to have processes in place to ensure bills were paid in a timely manner. This resulted in vendors denying necessary goods and services for residents or refusing to provide needed services without up front means of payment, leading to unsustainable…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify hazards and risks to ensure the Resident's environment remained free of accident hazards and the Resident received adequate supervision 1 of 3 residents (37) reviewed for falls. Resident 37, who had severely impaired cognition, required maximum assistance for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and identified as a high fall risk, experienced harm when four of 14 falls occurred in the facility within a timeframe of less than a month; two of the falls resulted in injury that required hospital intervention. Findings included. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify hazards and risks to ensure the resident's environment remained free of accident hazards and the resident received adequate supervision 1 of 3 residents (37) reviewed for falls. Resident 37, who had severely impaired cognition, required maximum assistance for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and identified as a high fall risk,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2025-12-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide thorough skin assessments to develop pressure offloading interventions and notify the provider timely of change in skin condition for treatment to prevent the worsening of pressure injuries (PI, localized damage to the skin and underlying soft tissue usually over a bony prominence) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for pressure injuries. Resident 1 experienced harm when their coccyx (tailbone) had a Stage 1 PI (intact skin with localized area of non-blanchable redness [red color does not change when area pressed]) present on admission that worsened to a Stage 3 PI (full-thickness loss of skin, in which fat is visible in the wound) and progressed to an unstageable PI (wound bed not visible with full-thickness skin and tissue loss) requiring wound debridement (removal of dead skin and tissue) by a wound care specialist and hospital evaluation. This failure placed the resident at risk for additional PIs and wound infection. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent an avoidable accident by ensuring the care plan regarding transfers was followed for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accidents. The failure to safely transfer Resident 1 using two-person assist resulted in actual harm when Resident 1 sustained a skin tear to their lower left extremity [leg (LLE)] requiring evaluation and intervention by the local emergency room (ER), and later required antibiotic (medications that treat infections caused by bacteria) therapy when the skin tear became infected. Findings included . Review of the facility policy Safe Resident Handling/Transfers, last revised in March 2023, showed staff members were expected to maintain compliance with safe handling/transfer practices and all transfers were to be performed according to the residents' individual care plan. <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of chronic kidney…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure, A) staff prepared, distributed and served resident food in accordance with professional standards of practice along with the maintenance of a sanitary (relating to the conditions that affect hygiene and health) kitchen environment for 1 of 1 kitchen, reviewed for food safety requirements and, B) resident foods brought in from outside sources were stored, labeled and dated with opened by and expiration dates for 1 of 1 resident refrigerator located in the kitchen, review for food safety. This failure placed residents at an increased risk for cross contamination (the harmful spread of diseases) of food borne illnesses.Findings included. Review of the facility's policy titled, Food: Safe Handling for Foods from Visitors/Residents, revised August 2025, showed resident would be assisted in properly storing and safely consuming foods brought into the facility by residents and/or visitors. The policy showed that food item would be stored…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide meal services in a dignified manner for 4 of 4 residents (23, 31,33 and 18) reviewed for dignity related to Residents (23, 31,33 and 18) waited an hour for lunch to be served. This failure placed the residents frustrated and embarrassed. Findings included . During an observation on 03/17/2026 at 11:45 AM, Residents (23, 31, 33 and 18) were seated at their tables and required assistance with meals in the main dining room. There were two tables that residents required extensive assistance and cueing. Other residents that sat in the main dining room were either setup assistance or independent with eating their meals. The lunch meal was served to residents on trays from the steam table located in the main dining room at 12:45 PM, (one hour after lunch trays were served to rooms in the 100 hall). The dining room was served their meals after hall 100 which was delayed. During an interview on 03/17/2026 at 12:18 PM, Staff T, Regional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with activities of daily living (ADL's) related to shower/bathing for 5 of 6 residents (Residents 6, 44, 24, 31, and 18) reviewed for ADL care. This failure placed the residents at an increased risk for poor hygiene, skin breakdown, an undignified existence, infection, and pain. Findings included . Resident 6 Review of the resident's medical records showed they admitted with diagnoses to include Multiple Sclerosis (a disease that disrupts the communication between the brain and the rest of the body that leads to fatigue, vision problems, and muscle weakness) and diabetes (increased sugar in the blood). The 12/08/2025 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 6's cognition was intact and was dependent on staff assistance for their showering and bathing needs. During an interview on 03/18/2026 at 8:42 AM, Resident 6 stated the facility only had one staff person that did showers. Resident 6 stated they were scheduled for two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and address nutritional needs for 4 of 5 residents (Residents 5, 10, 18 and 33) reviewed for nutrition. This failure placed the residents at risk for medical complications, nutritional weight loss, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 5 Review of the medical record showed the resident readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include end stage kidney disease with dialysis (a treatment that filters fluid and waste from your blood when your kidney are failing), dental caries (cavities), missing teeth, diabetes type 2 (a chronic condition where the body does not use insulin effectively), malnutrition (poor nutrition due poor diet intake) and heart disease. Review of Resident 5's 02/17/2026 comprehensive assessment showed the resident required setup only with their meals. Resident 5 had some cognitive and hearing loss but was able to make their needs known. Resident 5's 03/05/2026 care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-23 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there were enough competent nursing staff to provide care and services for 6 of 9 residents (Residents 37, 6, 24, 31, 18, and 44) as evidenced by failures related to Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) and prevention of accidents. This failure placed residents at risk of not having their needs met and potential/actual negative outcomes to their physical and mental health. Findings included. Review of the 02/25/2026 document titled Facility Assessment showed the facility had an average census of 48 residents. The assessment showed the facilities staffing plan was eight Nursing Assistants (NA) for day shift, seven NAs for evening shift, and four NAs for night shift per their census, and the resident population and their care needs and would be adjusted as needed. Review of the 02/15/2026 through 03/17/2026 (31 days), Staffing Pattern (a document that showed actual nursing staff on duty), completed by the facility, showed 29 of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough grievance process for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 3) reviewed for grievances. This failed practice placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included. Review of the 01/27/2023 policy titled Grievances, showed to read the grievance immediately when received and determine if the grievance is an allegation of .misappropriation of resident property, and exploitation., and if so, to take immediate action to prevent further potential violations. The policy showed the Grievance Officer/Executive Director/Designee Responsibilities would follow up with the Resident or the RR to ensure satisfaction with the outcome of the investigation. Review of the Resident's medical records showed they admitted with diagnoses to include a right leg, below the knee amputation (the surgical removal of all or part of a limb), diabetes (when the sugar in the blood is too high), and asthma (a lung condition that makes it difficult to breathe). The 12/28/2025 and the 02/06/2026 comprehensive assessments showed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal abuse for 1 of 3 resident's (Resident 64) reviewed for abuse/neglect. This failure placed residents at risk of experiencing fear, intimidation and mental anguish.Findings included.Review of a policy titled, Abuse Prevention and Reporting: Resident Mistreatment, Neglect, Abuse, Including Injuries of Unknown source, and Misappropriation of Resident Property, revised 08/2025, showed verbal abuse/mental abuse included the use of oral, written, or gestured communication or sounds, to residents within hearing distance, regardless of age, ability to comprehend, or disability that would demean or humiliate. Examples of verbal abuse included threatening residents, depriving a resident of care or withholding a resident from contact with family and friends. Review of the medical record showed Resident 64 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including right foot/ankle osteomyelitis (a serious bone infection),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their abuse/neglect prohibition policy for identification of verbal abuse for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 64) reviewed for abuse. This failure placed residents at risk of unidentified abuse/neglect, potential for continued exposure to abuse and psychological harm. Findings included. Review of the policy titled, Abuse Prevention and Reporting: Resident Mistreatment, Neglect, Abuse, Including Injuries of Unknown source, and Misappropriation of Resident Property, revised 08/2025, showed residents had the right to be free from abuse/neglect and staff were prohibited from using verbal abuse. The facility would provide immediate safety for a resident upon identification of potential abuse/neglect by staff and protect from retaliation. Resident 64 Review of the medical record showed Resident 64 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including right foot/ankle osteomyelitis (a serious bone infection), multiple sclerosis (a disease that damages the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0627 — isolated
    Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a patient-centered discharge plan by the interdisciplinary team for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 37) reviewed for discharge planning. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet discharge care needs. Finding included. Resident 37 Review of the resident's medical records showed the resident admitted with diagnoses to include a surgical repair of their right ulna (long bone in the forearm that runs from the elbow to the wrist), had a history of falling, and dementia (a group of symptoms that cause a loss of cognitive functioning). The 01/29/2026 comprehensive admission assessment showed Resident 37's cognition was severely impaired and used a wheelchair (w/c) for mobility. The assessment showed the Resident required substantial to maximum staff assistance for all their activities of daily living. During a telephone interview on 03/17/2026 at 3:59 PM, Resident 37's Representative (RR) stated they were in the process of looking for another facility that would accept Resident 37. The RR stated they were continuously…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue a written notice of bed hold (holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident was absent from the facility) for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 6), or provide a written notice of a hospital transfer or discharge to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman (a representative who helps residents in long-term care facilities, such as nursing homes and assisted living, understand and exercise their rights) for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 6 and 62) reviewed for hospitalization and discharge. This failure placed the residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed and any monetary charges associated with the bed hold and lack of discharge needs. Findings included. Review of a 04/2025 policy titled Bed-Hold showed the facility was required to provide a written notice of their bed-hold rights and the policy would be given to the Resident or the Resident's Representative (RR) upon transferring to the hospital or for a therapeutic leave. Review of a 04/2025 policy titled Notice of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 49 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR-an assessment used to identify people referred to nursing facilities with Serious Mental Illness [SMI], Intellectual Disabilities [ID]; or Related Conditions [RC] are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long-term care) Level I form was completed after a 30-day exempt hospital discharge (EHD-an expected stay to be less than 30 days at a nursing home) for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 1 and 10) reviewed for PASRR. This failure placed residents at risk for inappropriate nursing home placement, and/or not receiving necessary services for mental health needs.Findings included. Review of policy titled, PASRR Requirements, dated 04/2023, showed the facility would review all PASRR's for accuracy and would immediately complete a new PASRR Level I form and notify the PASRR evaluators. Additionally, when a resident was admitted on an EHD, the facility would notify the PASRR evaluators prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the nature/terms of entering into a binding arbitration agreement (an alternative means of settling disputes without a jury by trial) were explained to residents in a form and manner in which they could understand for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 64) reviewed for arbitration. This failure placed the residents at risk for a lack of understanding concerning the legal contract that had been signed/entered into and being fully informed regarding the resident's choice in the event of a dispute with the facility.Findings included.Review of the medical record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including a right foot/ankle bone infection, Multiple Sclerosis (MS, a chronic disease where an individual's own immune system attacks the protective covering of the brain and spinal cord nerve fibers which can lead to communication issues between the brain and the rest of the body). The 03/11/2026 admission assessment showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0895 — isolated
    Have a Compliance and Ethics Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement, maintain, and enforce an effective compliance/ethics program that utilized monitoring/auditing systems designed to be effective in preventing/detecting criminal, civil, and administrative violations of the Social Security Act S 1819 (Title 42 United States Code 1395i-3, a set of laws that identifies the requirements for and assuring the quality of care in skilled nursing facilities) to promote residents quality of care for 2 of 2 staff (Staff A and Staff W) reviewed for compliance and ethics. This failure placed residents at an increased risk of negative outcomes related to care and services provided by the facility.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention and Reporting: Resident Mistreatment, Neglect, Abuse, Including Injuries of Unknown Source, and Misappropriation of Resident Property, revised August 2025, showed residents had the right to be free from abuse/neglect, and facility staff were prohibited from using verbal/mental abuse. Verbal/mental abuse included threatening a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-23 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a safe, functional and sanitary (relating to the conditions that affect hygiene and health) Laundry room environment for 1 of 2 washing machines (WM1) and 1 of 1 drainage system (DS1), reviewed for environmental conditions. This failure placed residents and staff at an increased risk of cross-contamination (the harmful spread of diseases).Findings included.Observations of the Laundry room on 03/18/2026 at 5:11 PM showed: The facility had two washing machines and WM1 had a one foot (ft, a unit of measure) by one ft puddle of water underneath the back end of WM1, on the concrete floor, which was in the process of drying. The water was coming from a pipe supplying water to WM1 and was slowly dripping down the back left side of WM1's metal plate, which was wet to the touch. The water had been dripping down to the bottom of the washing machine and then to the ground. The ground beneath the washing machine had a white soap-like substance that had formed a white dried up two ft by three ft ring, which extended underneath…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive person-centered care plan was followed related to transfer guidelines for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for implementation of the care plan. This failure placed the resident at risk for injury and unmet care needs. Findings included. Resident 1 Review of the resident's medical record showed they were admitted with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis (a chronic condition that damages the nervous system causing muscle weakness), epilepsy (a brain disorder which results in seizures) and osteoporosis (a disease that weakens bones). Review of the comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident was cognitively intact and required total staff assistance to perform activities of daily living (basic tasks such as eating, grooming, mobility, transfers and personal hygiene) related to their chronic weakness. Review of Resident 1's care plan dated 09/25/2025 showed they were unable to bear weight or stand and had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper sanitization and food handling practices in accordance with standards of practice for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety. The failure to maintain a clean/sanitary kitchen and complete Hand Hygiene (HH, washing or sanitizing hands) as required, placed residents at risk for foodborne illnesses. Findings included . Review of the policy titled, Food Safety Requirements, revised 01/2024, showed food safety practices would be followed throughout the entire food handling process. All equipment used for food handling would be cleaned, sanitized and handlined to prevent contamination. Clean dishes would be kept separate from dirty dishes. The policy also showed staff were to follow safe hygienic practices to prevent contamination of foods by washing hands and change gloves appropriately. Review of the policy titled, Handwashing Guidelines for Dietary Employees, revised 03/2023, showed employees were to perform handwashing to prevent the spread of bacteria that may cause foodborne illness. Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-02-07 · tag F0851 — widespread
    Electronically submit to CMS complete and accurate direct care staffing information, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditable data.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that direct care staffing information was electronically submitted to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for 1 of 3 quartersof 2024 reviewed for Payroll Based Journal (PBJ a mandatory report for staffing based on payroll data submission). This failure caused CMS to have inaccuraterelated to Nursing home staffing levels and the potential impact on care and services provided by direct care staff. Findings included . Record review of the Certification and Survey Provider Enhanced Report (CASPER) showed the facility had failed to report PBJ data for the 4th Quarter July 1, 2024 to September 30, 2024. During an interview on 02/07/2025 at 3:50 PM, Staff A, Administrator, stated they were unaware that the PBJ data had not been submitted as required and would look into it. Reference WAC 388-97-109(1)(2)(3)

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure management staff only attended Resident Council meetings (a group at the facility comprised of and ran by residents) with a specific invitation to attend. This failure resulted in 2 of 4 residents (Resident's 11 and 35) expressed discomfort with voicing their concerns in the presence of management staff during their Resident Council meeting. This failure placed residents who attended Resident Council meetings at risk for discomfort and fear of reprisal (an act of retaliation) if bringing up issues that concerned them. Findings included . On 02/05/2025 at 9:30 AM a Resident Council meeting was held with surveyors per the long-term care survey process for nursing homes. Four facility residents participated in the meeting (Residents 20, 35, 23 and 11) and there were no staff present at the meeting. During a concurrent interview on 02/05/2025 at 9:36 AM, Resident 11 stated they felt uncomfortable speaking up in their usual Resident Council meetings because Staff A, Administrator, and Staff K, Resident Care Manager always…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accurately assess 2 of 5 residents (Residents 1 and 26), reviewed for Minimum Data Set (MDS, a standardized assessment tool used in long-term care facilities that assesses functional, medical, psychosocial, and cognitive status) accuracy. The failure to ensure accurate assessments regarding end-of-life care to guide the development of the comprehensive care plan placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the resident's medical record showed they admitted with diagnoses of spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy (a severe form of cerebral palsy where all four limbs (arms and legs) are effected by excessive muscle stiffness), dementia (a group of symptoms affecting memory, thinking and social abilities), major depressive disorder (a mental health condition that causes a persistently low or depressed mood and a loss of interest in activities that once brought joy), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD - a mental health condition that can develop after…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents ' Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews ([PASARR], an assessment to ensure individuals with serious mental illness [SMI] or intellectual/developmental disabilities [ID/DD] were not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) were accurately completed prior to admission and updated when new SMIs were identified and had the required Level II (a comprehensive evaluation by the appropriate state-designated authority) referral if residents had a positive Level I (a pre-screening evaluation for identifying SMI/ID/DD) PASARR for 4 of 9 residents (Residents 12, 42, 14 and 48) reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed the residents at risk of not receiving the mental health care and services appropriate for their needs. Findings Included . Review of the facility's undated policy titled Coordination with PASRR [newly titled PASARR] Program, showed all applicants to the facility would have a Level I PASAAR for SMI, ID/DD,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-02-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure staff followed accepted standards of clinical practice for 6 of 7 residents (Residents 16, 26, and 34) reviewed for end of life care( EOL, six months or less to live) and 3 of 6 residents (Resident's 12, 35 and 48) reviewed for Post Traumatic Stresss Disorder (PTSD, a mental health condition where someone continues to experience intense negative feelings and memories from a tramatic life event). All six residents were identified based on information provided on the Matrix (a form provided to the facility to be completed at the beginning of a Standard Re-Certification Survey to identify resident care categories) form. Residents 16, 26, and 34's medical records did not have supporting documentation to support the resident required EOL care nor were there diagnoses given by a physician. Additionally, Resident's 12 and 35 had no supporting documentation for the new diagnosis of PTSD and Resident 48 had no physician order or supporting documentaion…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement components of their infection prevention and control precautions for hand hygiene and glove change for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 14 and 48) reviewed during wound care treatment, and utilizing appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE, clothing and equipment that is worn and used to provide protection against hazardous substances or environments) and the sanitation of blood glucose testing (a blood test that measures the level of sugar in your blood) equipment for 2 of 2 Licensed Nurses (Staff BB and Staff CC) reviewed for medication administration. These failures placed residents at an increased risk for exposure to cross contamination (harmful spread of diseases) and transmission of infectious diseases. Findings included . <Medication Administration> An observation of a medication pass on 02/06/2025 at 2:46 PM, showed Staff BB, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN), administered blood glucose testing to Resident 46. Staff BB placed their supplies on a clean barrier, applied gloves, cleansed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident 17) reviewed for resident rights, was treated with respect and dignity. The facility developed the resident's care plan with inaccurate information which labeled the resident in a negative manner. The inaccurate information had the potential to create an environment that did not promote Resident 17's quality of life. Additionally, the facility did not identify appropriate interventions based on Resident 17's individualized care needs to ensure their right to a dignified existence. Findings included . <Resident 17> Review of Resident 17's medical record showed they were admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included, deafness (inability to hear), diabetes (a condition in which the body has trouble processing blood sugar), end stage renal disease (the kidneys no longer work) with dialysis (a procedure that removes excess fluid and waste from the body when the kidneys no longer work) and Post Traumatic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to fully inform the Resident Representative (RR) of benefits, options and treatment alternatives to receive hospice services (a program that gives special care to people who are near the end of life offering physical, emotional, social, and spiritual support for residents and their family) when a resident experienced a significant change in medical condition and placed on end-of life care (medical and supportive services provided for individuals nearing the end of their life due to a terminal illness or advanced age) for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for resident rights. This failure prevented the resident and their representative from making an informed decision regarding their treatment alternatives. Findings included . Review of the policy titled, Providing End of Life Care, revised 10/23/2024, showed the facility would provide the needed care and services to end of life care residents in accordance with the resident ' s preferences, goals and professional standards of practice. In addition, the end-of-life care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure the physical environment accommodated the individualized needs of 2 of 2 residents (Residents 32 and 12) reviewed for accommodation of needs. The failure to make needed adjustments to the resident's living space, placed the residents at risk for frustration, lack of desired independence, and injury. Findings included . <Resident 32> Review of the resident's medical record showed they admitted with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease (a movement disorder of the nervous system that worsens over time). The 11/08/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 32's cognition was intact and was very important for them to choose what clothes to wear and to care for their personal belongings. The assessment also showed Resident 32 used a wheelchair (w/c) and a walker and required staff supervision for personal hygiene and mobility. An observation on 02/03/2025 at 9:48 AM, showed Resident 32 was independently self-propelling their w/c into their room. Resident 32's bed was the furthest away from the entry way…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pooled resident funds had separate accounting with separate statements maintained showing deposits and withdrawals for 3 of 5 resident ' s (Resident 12, 40 and 43) reviewed for personal funds. This failure placed residents at risk of not having an accurate accounting of their personal funds held in trust. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Resident Personal Funds, dated 12/11/2024, showed the facility deposits the resident's personal funds of more than $50 in an interest-bearing account (or accounts) separate from any of the facility's operating accounts, and that credits all interest earned on resident's funds to that account. (In pooled accounts, there must be separate accounting for each resident's share.) <Resident 12> Review of the residents medical record showed they admitted with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases that cause persistent airflow obstruction and breathing problems). The 12/02/2024 comprehensive assessment showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a warm and comfortable, homelike environment for 6 of 12 residents (Residents 35, 42, 16, 13, 31, and 41) reviewed for heat and adaptive equipment maintenance. This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs, discomfort, and a non-homelike environment. Findings included . <Equipment> <Resident 35> Review of the resident 's medical records showed they admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include diabetes and chronic pain. The 11/22/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 35 's cognition was intact and required staff supervision/touching assistance for personal hygiene. An observation on 02/02/2025 at 10:23 AM, showed Resident 35 sitting up in their wheelchair (w/c) at their bedside. Resident 35 ' s bed had padded mobility rails (used to prevent injury from unpredictable movements) to the sides of their bed. The outer pad material of the rails had missing areas that exposed the inner white mesh like material…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete care conferences for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for resident/resident representative participation in care conferences. The failure to complete care conferences and allow resident participation in planning their care placed residents at risk for unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Interdisciplinary Care Conference Policy, dated 05/2023, showed the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT- a group of health care professionals with various areas of expertise who work together toward the goal of their residents) would hold a face-to-face care conference 72 hours after admission, 14 days after admission, quarterly (every three months), and with any significant changes in condition. <Resident 1> Review of the resident's medical record showed they admitted with diagnoses of spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy (a severe form of cerebral palsy where all four limbs (arms and legs) are affected by excessive muscle stiffness) and dementia (a group of symptoms affecting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative therapy services (a personalized training program to help people maintain or regain their ability to do every day tasks, like walking, dressing, and eating) were consistently implemented to prevent avoidable reduction of range of motion (ROM, how far you can move a joint in any direction) for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 35), reviewed for restorative therapy and limited ROM. This failure placed the resident at risk for loss of ROM, deconditioning, and loss of independence. Findings included . <Resident 35> Review of the resident ' s medical record showed they admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include diabetes (elevated sugar in the blood) and low back pain. The 11/22/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 35 had intact cognition, could eat independently, and required supervision/touching assistance of one staff member for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. The assessment additionally showed the resident received no specialized therapy or restorative programs. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis (the kidneys no longer function and require a mechanical process to remove waste and excess fluids from the blood stream) services met professional standards of care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 17), reviewed for dialysis. The facility did not have an effective or coordinated process for communication between the facility and the offsite dialysis center for continuity of care. This failure placed residents receiving dialysis at risk for complications and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of a policy titled Care Planning and Special Needs Dialysis dated April 2024 showed, The care plan will reflect coordination between the facility and the dialysis provider. Document, monitor pre/post dialysis weights and vital signs. Nursing staff will provide a report to the dialysis provider regarding the resident's condition each dialysis treatment. If no report is recieved upon return from dialysis, nursing staff will call provder to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 residents (Resident 17) received cultural, competent, trauma informed care in accordance with professional standards, reviewed for trauma care. The facility failed to implement identified care plan interventions related to Resident 17's Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a mental health condition that develops after an extremely traumatic event). This failure placed Resident 17 at risk for re-experiencing past trauma. Findings included . <Resident 17> Review of the resident's record showed they were admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included, deafness, PTSD, diabetes (elevate blood sugar levels) and end stage kidney disease (the kidneys are no longer functioning) with dialysis (a process in which removes waste and excess fluid from the blood). Review of the comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed the Resident 17 was cognitively intact. Further review showed the resident experienced feeling down and had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary psychotropic medications (medications capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 12 and 42) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to consistently develop, monitor, and document specific person-centered targeted behaviors, interventions, and adverse side effects of medication. Additionally, they failed to assess for abnormal involuntary movements with the Assessment Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS, a scale that assesses the presence and severity of abnormal movements of the face, limbs, and body in patients with tardive dyskinesia [abnormal and uncontrollable movements caused by antipsychotic medications] prior to starting a psychotropic medication and periodically thereafter). The deficient practice placed residents at an increased risk for experiencing medication-related adverse side effects, receiving medications they no longer needed, and increased behaviors due to inadequate dosing of medication. Findings included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications and wound supplies were discarded when expired and labeled correctly for 1 of 1 medication storage rooms and 1 of 1 treatment storage rooms. This failure placed residents at risk for receiving expired medication and/or experiencing compromised or ineffective medications and treatments. Findings included . Review of the facility's 12/2023 policy, titled Medication Storage showed, all medication rooms were routinely inspected for discontinued, outdated, defective, or deteriorated medications with worn, illegible, or missing labels and would be destroyed. <Medication storage room> An observation on [DATE] at 3:55 Accompanied by Staff S, Registered Nurse, the medication room showed: Two - glucagon (an emergency medication used to treat severe low blood sugar) injection pens 1 milligram (mg-unit of measure) each that expired on 01/2025. One- 16 - ounce (oz-unit of measure) bottle of lactulose (a medication used to treat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-07 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement key components of their immunization program regarding the pneumococcal vaccine (a vaccine that protects against pneumococcal infections that can lead pneumonia and blood infections) by not ensuring residents were thoroughly screened for the pneumococcal vaccination status on admission and were administered the pneumococcal vaccines as required per current Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Advisory Committee on Immunization practices guidance for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 2 and 21) reviewed for immunizations. This failure placed residents at risk of exposure to contagious diseases and an increased the risk for respiratory complications. Findings included . Review of the 05/01/2017 policy, titled Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations, showed upon admission residents would be given information regarding the immunizations risks and benefits, obtain history of previous immunizations, and obtain consent from the resident or the Resident Representative if an immunization needed to be given.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and sanitary environment for 2 of 2 storage rooms reviewed for environment. This failure placed residents at risk of injury and potential illness from unsanitary equipment storage. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Environmental Quality, revised 05/2023, showed the facility would maintain and provide a safe and sanitary environment by utilizing preventive maintenance schedules for the building and equipment to maintain a safe environment. <Storage Room> An observation on 02/02/2025 at 10:48 AM, showed the labeled storage room door ajar and unlocked. Inside the storage room was a wall to the left with an electrical panel, multiple electrical wires exposed. The floor had three-foot-tall computer network equipment system with an open computer laptop on top of the system. On the floor was two large spools of wire, a white board leaned up against the wall, and an easel. The back wall directly behind the computer network system had painted open wood shelving. The shelving had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-21 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility Administration failed to effectively, efficiently, and in accordance with acceptable standards of practice, manage its resources to ensure continued services were secured for the facility. This failure placed the residents at risk for disruptions in care and services. Findings included . Review of a job description titled, Administrator, undated and unsigned, showed the Administrator was responsible for directing the overall operation of the facility in accordance with current state and federal regulations. Additionally, the Administrator was responsible for leading budget development with department heads, and in conjunction with the Business Office Manager, leads weekly or bi-monthly budget compliance meetings to ensure financial goals were met. The Administrator was responsible for reviewing and interpreting monthly financial statements and provides that information to the governing board. The Administrator was responsible for establishing a culture of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-21 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and update the Facility Assessment [(FA) - an evaluation that determines the resources required to meet each resident's care and services needs] with substantial modifications for vendor services, did not include input from a member of the governing body, medical director, and residents and/or their representatives when developing the FA, and was inaccurate regarding the provision of compliance and ethics training. These failures placed the residents at risk of unidentified and/or unmet care and services. Findings included . Record review of the FA dated 08/01/2024, showed the FA would demonstrate a good faith effort by the facility to evaluate necessary resources for resident care during daily operations and emergencies. The FA included care and services related to the types of disease conditions, physical and behavioral health needs, and any other pertinent conditions consistent with resident assessments. The FA included necessary resources, but not limited to, providing staff training and education, policies and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-10-21 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have an effective Quality Assurance/Performance Improvement (QAPI) Committee that self-identified deficient practices which led to a pattern of widespread deficiency systems issues within the facility related to the Administration, Governing Body, compliance and ethics, Facility Assessment and financial instability. The failure to utilize the facility's QAPI procedures to sustain compliance with regulations for the facility, placed residents at risk for unsafe conditions, a delay in necessary care and services, and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Review of a policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI), revised 10/19/2023, showed The QAPI plan would have a process to identify and correct quality deficiencies, including analyzing causes of a systemic deficiency; develop and implement corrective action plans; commitment for quality assessment, improvement and accountability by the Governing Body; and a process to ensure care and services meet accepted quality standards. Refer to Code…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-21 · tag F0895 — widespread
    Have a Compliance and Ethics Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to design, implement, maintain, and enforce a compliance and ethics program aimed at preventing and identifying criminal, civil, and administrative violations of the Social Security Act § 1819 (a set of laws that identifies the requirements for and assuring the quality of care in skilled nursing facilities), and promoting quality of care. This failure placed the residents at risk of negative outcomes related to care and services provided by the facility. Findings included . Review of the undated policy titled, Process for Handling the Compliance Hotline, showed the facility had a Compliance Hotline for reporting concerns to the Chief Compliance Officer or designee (may be a third-party vendor) for compliance and ethics related to facility business practices and policies. Review of the undated policy titled, Compliance and Ethics Reporting, showed the facility implemented and publicized a reporting system for anyone to report violations that ensures the integrity of the reported concern. The policy also showed there was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-21 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to return the balance of funds to the Office of Financial Recovery [(OFR) responsible for the recovery of financial, medical, social services, and food assistance overpayments from the Department of Social and Health Services clients] for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 1, 2, 3 and 4) reviewed for conveyance of personal funds. This failure placed the state department of risk for loss of funds and interest accumulated. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Resident Personal Funds, revised 06/12/2024, showed upon discharge, eviction, or death of a resident that had personal funds held by the facility in a trust account, would convey those funds within 30 days to the resident, or in case of death, the individual or probate district administering the resident's estate, in accordance with state law. <Resident 1> Review of Resident 1's medical record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] and expired on 08/20/2024. Resident 1's trust account…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-21 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide behavioral health services for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 5) reviewed for behavioral health services. The failure to provide behavioral health services placed Resident 5 and other residents at risk for not receiving necessary services to meet their mental health needs. Findings included . Review of the policy titled, Behavioral Health Services, revised 12/01/2022, showed the facility would ensure the residents received necessary behavioral health services. <Resident 5> Record review of Resident 5's medical record showed they had diagnoses including bipolar disorder (a mental illness that causes unusual shifts in a person's mood, energy, activity level, and concentration), anxiety, depression and history of substance abuse. The 10/08/2024 comprehensive assessment showed the resident had a moderate cognitive impairment and was able to make their needs known. The assessment also showed Resident 5 felt depressed, hopeless, and felt bad about themselves nearly every day during the assessment period. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to effectively implement infection control interventions intended to mitigate and contain infestations of bed bugs (small insects that feed on blood) for 4 of 6 Sampled residents (Residents 1, 2, 3, and 4) reviewed for infection control and communicable disease outbreaks. This deficient practice placed all residents at risk for the spread and development of a bed bug infestation with the potential for impaired skin integrity and physical discomfort. Findings included . Review of the facility's incident log showed two incidents of bed bugs identified on 03/31/2024. Review of the facility's investigations, dated 04/02/2024, showed the bed bug infestation was identified in room [ROOM NUMBER] affecting Resident 1 and Resident 2. The investigation summary showed Resident 1 and Resident 2 were moved into an isolation room, all clothing and linen were washed and dried twice with high heat, and other personal belongings were placed in plastic bags…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-12 · tag F0802 — failed to prepare enough nourishing food — widespread
    Provide sufficient support personnel to safely and effectively carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to employ sufficient and qualified staff that were adequately trained and supervised to prepare/provide and safely carry out the functions of meal preparation (food temperatures, portion sizes, and recipes) and kitchen sanitation practices (dishwasher maintenance and sanitizing buckets) for 5 of 6 kitchen staff (Staff R, S, Q, T, and U), reviewed for food service. These failures placed the residents at risk for improperly prepared meals, less than palatable meals, and risk for food borne illnesses. Findings included . <Food temperatures> Review of the State Operations Manual, Appendix PP, last revised 02/03/2023 (F812) §483.60(i)(1)-(2), showed final cooking temperatures as the following: • Poultry and stuffed foods - 165 degrees Fahrenheit (F, unit of measurement); • Ground meat, ground fish, and eggs - at least 155 degrees F; • Fish and other non-ground meats - 145 degrees F; • Fresh, frozen, or canned fruits and vegetables should be cooked to a hot holding temperature of 135 degrees F to prevent the growth of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-12 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide meals that were flavorful, palatable, attractive, and served at an appetizing temperature for 12 of 12 residents (Residents 4, 249, 11, 15, 5, 43, 16, 20, 2, 21, 22, and 32) reviewed for food. This failure placed the residents at risk for a diminished dining experience, dissatisfaction with meals, and a less than adequate nutritional intake leading to weight loss. Findings included . <Resident 4> Review of the medical record showed Resident 4 was admitted the facility on 12/11/2023. The 12/14/2023 comprehensive assessment showed that Resident 4 had an intact cognition (a term for the mental processes that take place in the brain, including thinking, attention, language, learning, memory, and perception). During an interview on 01/10/2024 at 1:44 PM, Resident 4 stated the food was horrible. They stated some days the facility runs out of food .they run out of everything all of the time. Resident 4 stated the meals were not balanced,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen followed proper sanitation and food handling practices for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety. The failure to handle and prepare food in a sanitary manner, obtain and record food temperatures, refrigerator and freezer temperatures, and dishwasher water temperatures, test and record sanitation solution levels, and monitor and follow a cleaning schedule for the kitchen placed all residents at risk for food borne illness. Findings included . <Food Handling and Preparation> An observation on 01/07/2024 at 10:56 AM, showed Staff R, Cook, wearing a glove on their left hand and placed a slice of white bread on the unsanitized stainless-steel countertop They proceeded to spread egg salad on the bread with their non-gloved hand and placed a slice of bread on top of the egg salad with their non-gloved hand. Staff R removed their left-hand glove and obtained a box of plastic wrap from a shelf, then wrapped the sandwich in the plastic wrap. Staff R did not perform hand hygiene at any time during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to support the resident right to voice concerns nor have timely follow up regarding grievances for 8 of 8 residents (Resident 13, 21, 32, 37, 38, 39, 41 and 42) reviewed for grievances. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet dietary needs, care needs and resolution of voiced concerns. Findings included . A review of the facility's 03/14/2023 policy titled, Resident and Family Grievances showed that it was the right for each resident and family member to voice grievances and there will be prompt efforts to resolve those complaints/grievances. A review of the facility's June 2023 policy Resident Council Meetings showed the activities staff were to be a liaison between the food and resident council and the facility. <Grievances> Review of six months of Resident council meeting minutes showed grievances related to food and missing clothing. On June 8, 2023, Residents 37 and 38 they would like a variety of salad dressings for their salads. The food complaints were passed on the Dietary Manager (DM). • On July 6, 2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently offer substantial nutritional snacks in the evening for 5 of 5 residents (Residents 4, 21, 22, 32, and 200) reviewed for evening snacks. This failure placed the residents at risk for hunger and unmet nutritional needs. Findings included . Review of an undated facility provided document titled, Meal Delivery Times, showed meals were served at 7:30 AM, 11:30 AM, and 4:30 PM (15 hours between the evening meal and breakfast meal). Record review of the facility provided documents titled Eve Shift Assignments, dated 12/01/2023 through 01/08/2024, showed the nursing assistants (NA) were assigned to passing the nutrition and/or snack cart on 23 of 39 evening shifts. <Resident 4> Review of the electronic medical record showed Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The 12/14/2023 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 4 had an intact cognition (a term for the mental processes that take place in the brain, including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 18) were implemented related to hand hygiene and glove changes between dirty and clean tasks (after touching the resident and/or the resident's environment) and 2 of 2 staff (Staff DD and EE) observed for infection control during meal tray delivery. These failures placed the residents at an increased risk for exposure to cross-contamination (harmful spread of diseases) and transmission of infectious diseases. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Hand Hygiene, showed that all staff were to perform proper hand hygiene to prevent the spread of infections to other personal, residents and visitors. When performing hand washing, facility staff were to .apply soap or Alcohol Based Hand rub, rub hands together vigorously for at least 20 seconds covering all surfaces of the hands and fingers . Additionally, facility staff were to perform hand hygiene…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the facility failed maintain safe operating conditions for washing machine used for laundry of residents' personal care items and kitchen laundry for 1 of 3 washing machines (Washer 1) reviewed for laundry equipment. This failure placed the residents at risk for ineffective cleaning of laundry and cross contamination of infectious diseases. Findings included . <Laundry> During an observation and interview on 01/09/2024 at 1:30 PM, Staff O, Laundry Aide, stated that the rust located within the top loader stand-alone washer had been there for months. The washer had been used for residents' personal laundry and laundering of kitchen cloths. Washer 1 was observed with significant rust when opened the top loader. Under the lid on left side of the lid was a five inch by five inches by five-inch triangular shaped area that had significant dark rust color with rust flakes along where the bleach was poured in the reservoir. The rust discoloration was in the barrel of the washer where clothing was also placed for washing. Additionally, observations showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect for 2 of 2 residents (Resident 11 and 15) reviewed for care and services. This failure placed the residents at risk for embarrassment and low self-esteem. Findings included . Review of a facility policy titled, Resident Rights, revised May 2023, showed the resident had the right to be treated with respect and dignity, and to make choices about aspects of their life that were significant to them. <Resident 11> Review of the medical record showed Resident 11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cancer, depression, and anxiety. The 12/28/2023 comprehensive assessment showed the resident required partial to substantial assistance of one to two staff members with their activities of daily living (ADL), including showering and personal care. The assessment also showed the resident had an intact cognition. A concurrent observation and interview on 01/07/2024 at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0568 — isolated
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents, or their representatives, were provided with quarterly personal fund statements for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 37) reviewed for trust accounts. This failure placed the residents at risk of not having an accurate accounting of their personal funds held in trust accounts by the facility and financial exploitation. Findings included . <Resident 37> Review of Resident 37's medical record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), weakness, and depression. The 11/04/2023 comprehensive assessment showed the resident had a severely impaired cognition. During an interview on 01/07/2024 at 1:53 PM, Resident 37's representative (RR) stated the facility held money in a trust account for Resident 37 for small purchases such as a haircut. The RR stated they did not know how much money was in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0570 — isolated
    Assure the security of all personal funds of residents deposited with the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an active surety bond (a written agreement wherein the facility and their insurance company agree to compensate the resident for any loss of resident funds that the facility holds, safeguards, manages, and accounts for) covered an amount greater than or equal to the value of resident funds deposited in the facility's resident trust account. This failure placed 31 of 48 residents, who had trust accounts with the facility, at risk to be unable to recover their money in the event of loss of funds from their account. Findings included . Review of the facility's Trial Balance report, dated 01/10/2024, showed 31 residents had trust accounts with the facility. The total balance of the facility resident trust accounts was $8,564.64. During an interview on 01/10/2024, Staff I, Business Office Manager, stated the Administrator had requested a copy of the surety bond in October of 2023 but had not received it yet. Staff I did not know the amount of the surety bond. During an interview on 01/12/2024 at 8:05 AM, Staff A,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a safe, homelike environment for 9 of 12 residents (Residents 29, 7, 37, 6, 11, 22, 32, 28, and 25) reviewed for homelike environment. This failure placed the residents at risk for compromised dignity and a less than homelike living environment. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Resident Rights, revised May 2023, showed the residents have the right to a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. <Resident 29> Review of the medical record showed Resident 29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (impaired memory loss, thinking ability, judgement, and forgetfulness, that impairs daily functioning), depression, and heart failure. The 10/31/2023 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 29 required set up/supervision assistance of one staff member for activities of daily living (ADLs). The assessment also showed the resident had a moderately impaired…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the plan of care for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 5), reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). The failure to follow the plan of care intervention for transfers placed the resident at risk for injury. Findings included . Record review of an in-service training provided to staff, dated 10/03/2023, showed that transfers should be done after reviewing the [NAME] (a quick reference guide for nursing staff directives to care for the resident per the plan of care). The training showed that a Hoyer lift (a mechanical lift that allows a person to be lifted with minimum of physical effort) transfer were to be conducted by two people. Further review of the training showed that Staff M, Nursing Assistant (NA) and Staff L, NA, did not sign the in-service training sheet. Record review of the plan of care, dated 12/05/2018, showed that Resident 5 was a two person assist for transfers with the use of a Hoyer lift. Review of the medical record showed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents who were trauma survivors received culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 18) reviewed for mood and behavior. The facility failed to assess and monitor, a resident with a traumatic history and diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD, a disorder that develops when a person has experienced or witnessed a scary, shocking, terrifying, or dangerous event) for potential triggers that may cause re-traumatization. This failure placed the resident at risk for unidentified triggers and re-traumatization. Findings included . <Resident 18> Review of the resident's medical record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including PTSD. The 10/14/2023 comprehensive assessment showed the resident had a severely impaired cognition and were unable to make their needs known. Review of the trauma informed care assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affect brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) for 1 of 5 residents (Residents 20) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to monitor individualized targeted behaviors, ensure as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications were limited to 14-days or had a documented rationale for the extended use of the PRN psychotropic, nor consistently attempted non-pharmacological interventions (alternative treatment of a resident's symptoms that do not involve medications and directed toward understanding, preventing and relieving a resident's distress or loss of abilities) prior to psychotropic medication administration. These failures placed residents at an increased risk for experiencing medication-related adverse side effects, and unmet care needs. Finding included . Review of the facility's policy titled, Use of Psychotropic Medication, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide prompt routine dental services for 1 of 2 resident (Resident 16) reviewed for dental services. The failure to address Resident 16's concerns around dental care needs and placed Resident 16 at increased risk for dental impairment/nutritional needs. Findings included . <Resident 16> Review of the medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of insulin dependent diabetes (your body does not make enough insulin or cannot use it well as it should), end stage kidney disease with dialysis (a procedure that removes waste products and excess fluid from the blood when a resident's kidneys stopped working properly and multiple other medical diagnoses. The 12/07/2023 resident assessment showed the resident had no missing teeth or dental issues. The resident was alert and able to make needs known. During an interview on 01/07/2024 at 10:29 AM, the resident stated their back teeth needed to be looked at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the proper disposal of trash for 1 of 1 dumpster (Dumpster 1) reviewed for outdoor refuse storage. The failure to ensure Dumpster 1 was covered with a lid placed the facility at risk of attracting bugs, rodents, and an unsanitary environment. Findings included . Review of an undated facility policy titled, Disposal of Garbage and Refuse, showed refuse containers and dumpsters kept outside the facility would be designed and constructed to have tightly fitting lids, doors, or covers. Containers and dumpsters would be kept covered when not being loaded. An observation on 01/07/2024 at 8:25 AM, showed dumpster 1 located outside, behind the facility. The lid to one side of the dumpster was open and trash bags were visible. An observation on 01/08/2024 at 1:23 PM, showed the same dumpster with one lid open and exposed trash bags. An observation on 01/12/2024 at 7:49 AM, showed dumpster 1 with both lids open. During an interview on 01/12/2024 at 8:24 AM, Staff Y, Dietary Manager, stated the dumpster needed to remain closed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY <Resident 44> Review of the resident's medical records showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including fusion of the lower spine bones, UTI, and kidney stones. Review of the resident's comprehensive assessment, dated 12/24/2023, showed the resident had a moderately impaired cognition, was able to make their needs known to nursing staff, and required substantial to maximal assistance of one to two staff members for toileting hygiene (actions performed daily tasks like perineal care [cleaning of the private areas of the body], and management of an indwelling urinary catheter [IUC, a tube that drains urine from the bladder] or adjustment of clothes after going to the bathroom). Additionally, the comprehensive assessment showed the resident had an IUC and had been receiving antibiotics. Review of Resident 44's Physician's orders for Antibiotics from 08/16/2023 through 01/11/2024 showed: • From 08/18/2023 through 08/25/2023 and 11/15/2023 through 11/20/2023 Ciprofloxacin (a type of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$205,277 in federal fines across 4 penalties.

  • $78,750 — penalty dated 2026-03-23
  • $11,362 — penalty dated 2025-11-18
  • $9,242 — penalty dated 2024-09-09
  • $105,923 — penalty dated 2024-09-09

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
Ownership Data Not Available

The source lists no ownership percentage for any party here — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$7.3M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.1M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 74%Medicare 12%Other / private 14%

About 74% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$398per resident / day
operating cost
$12,105per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$401per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505401. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next