Emerald Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 26 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 93% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 82 beds and averages 74.0 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.98 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.50 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.30 on weekdays — 26% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.52 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 12 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-03-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide hot liquids at a safe drinking temperature for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for accident hazards. Resident 1 experienced harm in which they sustained burns on their right thigh from hot coffee. This failed practice placed the residents at risk for burn injuries, pain, and adverse health conditions.Findings included. Review of a policy titled, Free of Hazards/Supervision and Devices, dated 02/2025, showed the facility would ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent avoidable accidents and injuries. The facility would implement a systemic, interdisciplinary approach for identifying, evaluating, and mitigating risks, while maintaining resident safety, dignity, independence, and choice. Review of the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries guidance titled, Burn Injury Facts, dated 04/01/2009, showed scald burns occurred when skin comes in contact with hot liquids or steam. Water at a temperature of 155 degrees Fahrenheit [(F) a temperature…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-30 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that unless the facility had a full-time Registered Dietician (RD), that the Dietary Manager (Staff H, Dietary Manager (DM)) had the competencies and skill sets to carry out food and nutrition services for their resident population. This failure placed residents at risk of receiving dietary services from staff who had not completed an academic program in nutrition or dietetics accredited by an appropriate national accreditation organization. Findings included. During an interview on 01/25/2026 at 9:28 AM, Staff H stated they were the DM in training. Staff H stated they would hope to have their required certification by March 2026. During an interview on 01/29/2026 at 10:23 AM, Staff I, Kitchen Manager, stated they would assist the DM if they needed help. Staff I stated they were not the oversight of the DM and that they assumed the Registered Dietitian (RD) was the DMs' oversight. Staff I stated the RD worked two to three days a week and was a consultant for the facility. Staff I stated they themselves carried no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-30 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to discard expired foods in 1 of 1 walk in refrigerator, 1 of 1 stand-alone refrigerator, and 1 of 1 dry storage area used to store food items for the entire resident population, reviewed for safe and sanitary kitchen. Additionally, the facility failed to follow the thawing process of foods or consistently monitor cooked food temperatures prior to serving the food. This failed practice placed residents at risk for Food borne illness (caused by consuming foods that are contaminated with harmful pathogens [bacteria that reproduce rapidly once entered in the body and can damage tissues and cause illness]).Findings included.Review of a 02/2025 policy titled Thawing Frozen Food, showed ground beef could be thawed for one to two days and then once thawed, could be kept another one to two days (a total of four days from removing from a frozen state). The policy showed bacon or sausage could be kept up to seven days. Expired Foods During the initial tour of the kitchen on 01/25/2026 at 8:50 AM showed: Stand-alone…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement 4 of 8 components (identify, protect, report, and investigate), of their abuse/neglect policy/procedure for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 9, 35, and 40) reviewed for allegations of abuse/neglect. This failure placed the residents at risk for unrecognized abuse and unmet care needs. Findings included .Review of a 01/2026 policy titled Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, showed the facility would prohibit and prevent abuse, neglect, and.of residents. with ongoing oversight and supervision of staff to ensure policies were being implemented. Review of the grievance (a formal or informal complaint about care or living conditions) log, dated 07/01/2025 through 01/25/2026, showed allegations of abuse and/or neglect that had not been identified, reported, or investigated as allegations of abuse and/or neglect, nor were the resident's provided protection from further abuse and/or neglect. The logs showed: On 12/23/2025 a staff concern issue was logged for Resident 9 regarding lack of assistance/care was provided from Staff M,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report potential allegations of abuse and/or neglect to the State Agency (SA) for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 9, 35, and 40) reviewed for abuse/neglect. This failed practice placed the residents at risk for unidentified and ongoing abuse and/or neglect. Findings included. Resident 9 Review of the medical record showed Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (a progressive, fatal, neurogenerative disease that destroys motor neurons leading to loss of movement, speech, swallowing, and breathing capabilities though cognition stays intact.) The 11/17/2025 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 9's cognition was intact and required total assistance with bed mobility, transfers, dressing, toileting, feeding, and personal hygiene. During a concurrent observation and interview with Resident 9 on 01/26/2026 at 1:16 PM, showed them sitting upright in their bed, eyeglasses in place…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-30 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a complete and thorough investigation had been completed for reported allegations of abuse and/or neglect for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 9, 35, and 40) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The failure to conduct a thorough investigation including root cause, contributing factors, and identifying preventative measures to rule out abuse/neglect placed the residents at risk for further unmet care needs and psychosocial harm. Findings included. Resident 9 Review of the resident's medical record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) (a progressive, fatal, neurogenerative disease that destroys motor neurons leading to loss of movement, speech, swallowing, and breathing capabilities though cognition stays intact), depression, anxiety and chronic pain. The 11/17/2025 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 9's cognition was intact and required total assistance with bed mobility,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0646 — pattern
  Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) assessments were completed for residents following significant change in status or with newly evident or possible serious mental disorders for 3 of 7 residents (Resident 23, 59, and 31) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure resulted in a potential delay in access to Level 2 PASARR services and decreased quality of life. Findings included .Resident 31 Review of the resident's medical records showed they admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include heart failure and a stroke (when blood flow to the brain is interrupted from a blocked or burst of a blood vessel) with deficits to their right side. The 01/02/2026 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 31's cognition was severely impaired, had a diagnosis of dementia (the loss of cognitive functioning; thinking, remembering, and reasoning to such an extent that it interferes with a person's daily life and activities), and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-30 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — pattern
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a system to evaluate, and document demonstrated competencies (a series of knowledge, abilities, skills, experiences and behaviors, which leads to effective performance of staff regarding resident cares) and skill sets for 3 of 3 Licensed Nurses (Staff D,M and Q) reviewed for staff competencies. This deficient practice placed all residents at risk of receiving care from inadequately trained staff and unmet care needs.Findings included.Washington State Board of Nursing (an entity that regulates the competency and quality of nurses to protect the health and safety of the public) defined nurse competency in reference to [NAME] Administrative Code 246-840-210(5) titled, Continuing Competency .the ongoing ability of a nurse to maintain, updated, and demonstrate sufficient knowledge, skills, judgement, and qualifications to practice safely and ethically .Review of the Facility Assessment, updated January 2026, showed the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the call light and bedside table was within reach and easily accessible for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 13) reviewed for reasonable accommodations. This deficient practice prevented the resident from independently accessing personal items such as their bedside beverage, using the call light, and placed them at risk for unmet care needs.Findings included .Review of the medical record showed Resident 13 had diagnoses of anoxic brain injury (occurs when the brain received no oxygen), hemiplegia (paralysis) of the left side, and loss of vision to left eye. Review of the comprehensive assessment, dated 12/31/2025, showed Resident 13 had moderate cognitive impairment and was dependent on the assistance of one to two people for dressing, hygiene, incontinent care, bathing, and transfers using a mechanical lift.Review of Resident 13's care plan, on 01/29/2026, showed Resident 13 was blind in their left eye, had limited vision in their right eye, was able to use the call light appropriately, and their call light…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to review and validate the Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews (PASARR), (an assessment to ensure individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) or intellectual/developmental disabilities are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) were completed prior to admission and/or corrected or updated as required to reflect a Level 2 screening was completed for 2 of 7 residents, (Residents 4 and 9) reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed the residents at risk for not receiving the care and services appropriate for their needs.Findings included .Resident 4 Review of the medical record showed Resident 4 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia (a decline in mental abilities, characterized by the loss of memory, language, problem solving and other thinking skills), psychotic disturbance (a severe mental disruption that causes a person to lose touch with reality causing impaired thinking, emotions and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: Number of residents cited: Review of the resident's medical records showed they admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include hydronephrosis (one or both kidneys cannot drain from the kidney to the bladder) with obstruction from kidney stones (hard, pebble like pieces of material that form in the kidneys) and kidney disease. Review of the 01/02/2026 significant change comprehensive assessment showed Resident 31's cognition was severely impaired, required the use of an RC, and did not experience pain. Additional review of Resident 31's medical records showed they had been admitted to Hospice services on 01/02/2026 for a primary diagnosis of Cerebrovascular disease (conditions that affect blood flow to your brain). An observation and concurrent interview at 01/26/2026 at 5:21 PM, Resident 31 was observed lying in bed with their Resident Representative (RR) sitting in a chair at their bedside. The RC tubing and bag were hanging down to the left side of the bed and hanging on the bed frame. The RC bag had less than 100 milliliters (mL, a unit of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2026-03-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 8 rows in the source record cover these 5 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 88% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA