Crescent Health Care
505 North 40th Avenue, Yakima, WA 98908 · For profit - Corporation · 85 certified beds · (509) 248-4446 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2023
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0605, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568, F0569)
- it has 5 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (47) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $245,834 in federal fines (most recent 2026-03-11)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 2 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 2 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 2 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 20.7% | 14.2% | 15.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 4.6% | 5.5% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 5.3% | 1.0% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 3.0% | 1.6% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 3.1% | 17.7% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.6% | 0.1% | 0.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 2.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 32.2% | 17.2% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 9.2% | 12.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.6% | 93.8% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 10.0% | 4.3% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 22.3% | 22.5% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 24.3% | 15.1% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 7.1% | 1.3% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 81.2% | 82.0% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 20.9% | 19.9% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.6% | 13.4% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.31 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.91 | 1.52 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.0% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 69 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 31.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 35 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: not reported. This home filed no therapist hours at all in its payroll data for this quarter. That is a gap in what it reported, and we do not read it as an absence of therapy — the homes that file nothing here include ones that discharged hundreds of Medicare rehab patients in the very same period, who plainly received therapy from someone. Because we cannot tell a home that under-reports from one that genuinely provides little, this home is left out of the comparison above rather than scored at zero. Ask it directly how many therapist hours a rehab resident gets, and on which days.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.0%CMS range 48.5–67.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.0%CMS range 6.7–14.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 31.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 34.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 42.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 89.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 92.3% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.4%CMS range 4.4–14.5 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.09 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 51.6 residents a day — about 61% occupied, or roughly 33 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.21 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.74 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.75 to 0.54 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
47 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 32 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to identify and prevent an avoidable accident hazard in the resident's environment for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) that used both bed bolsters (a soft barrier along the edge of the bed that minimizes the risk of rolling off the bed) and required mechanical lift transfers. Resident 1 experienced harm when they slid out of the lift sling during two-staff assist transfer when the resident in the sling did not clear the top edge of the bolster there by lifting the lower left sling loop up off the lift hook due to no longer being taut and the loop disconnected from the lift. The fall resulted in pain, a forehead wound, and transfer to the hospital where they were diagnosed with an ankle fracture. This failure placed resident with mechanical lift transfers at risk for injury and a diminished quality of life. Findings included.Review of the medical record showed that Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision, immediately assess a resident after a fall, implement and evaluate care-plan interventions for efficacy, and ensure care-planned interventions were consistently followed to prevent an avoidable fall for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 54) reviewed for hospitalizations. Resident 54 who had moderately impaired cognition with a known history of falls prior to admission and was assessed at high risk for falls, experienced harm when they had an unwitnessed fall, were found face down on the floor with multiple lacerations, required transfer to the hospital for pain, and were diagnosed with multiple complex fractures (left humerus, hip, and left tibia) which required surgical intervention.Findings included .Review of the facility's policy titled Falls Clinical Protocol, dated 01/2022, showed the facility would identify and document residents' fall-risk factors and develop individualized, resident-centered fall-prevention plans that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-12-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to consistently assess skin and/or wounds or implement interventions to ensure the prevention and the worsening of facility-acquired pressure injuries (PI) for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 30) reviewed for PIs. Resident 30 experienced harm when they developed three avoidable PIs (right heel, left heel, and left calf) that were not present upon admission, and a decreased quality of life due to the pain. Findings included . Review of the National PI Advisory Panel's (NPIAP, the leading expert in PIs/wounds) guidelines and definitions, dated September 2016, defined PI stages as follows: Stage 1 PI has intact skin with a localized area of non-blanchable erythema (redness). Stage 2 PI is a partial thickness skin loss with exposed dermis (the top inner layers of skin). Stage 3 PI is a full thickness loss of skin, in which adipose (fat) tissue is visible in the ulcer. Slough (dead tissue) and or eschar (dried blood and tissue) may be visible,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2024-12-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure restorative therapy services including the consistent use of braces/splints were implemented timely to prevent avoidable reduction of range of motion (ROM) and mobility for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 27 and 20) reviewed for restorative therapy. Resident 27 experienced harm when they developed right and left-hand contractures (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue that leads to muscle stiffening and loss of range of motion of the effected body part). This failed practice placed other residents at risk for contractures, decreased mobility, and pain. Findings included . Record review of the facility policy titled, Rehabilitative Nursing Care, dated 01/2021, showed the facility had: .Nursing personnel who were trained in restorative nursing care. The facility will have an active program for restorative nursing which will be developed and coordinated through the resident's care plan. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and correct environmental hazards for assistive devices (wheelchair) and complete assessments for fall risks to reduce and/or eliminate falls for 3 of 4 residents (Resident 50, 25, and 48) reviewed for accident hazards. These failures placed the residents at risk for avoidable accidents and resulted in actual harm to Resident 50, when they experienced a fall from their wheelchair when the right brake failed to stay locked during a transfer from their wheelchair to their recliner, resulting in a fractured (broken) right wrist. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Falls - Clinical Protocol, dated 01/2020, showed the nursing staff will document risk factors for falling in the resident's record and discuss the resident's fall risk. <Resident 50> Review of the medical record showed Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including surgical amputation (loss or removal of a body part) of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide residents and representatives, information on how to report concerns, incidents and grievances for 4 of 6 residents (35,19, 33and 18) reviewed for grievances. The facility failed to establish a grievance policy that included prominent postings throughout the facility, right to file a grievance by written means or anonymously, the right to review the complaint in writing, and a reasonable time frame for review resolution of the concern. This failure potentially affects residents' quality of care and unresolved concerns. Findings included . Review of the 08/2025 Resident Grievances policy showed residents have a right to file a grievance and encourage them to speak with the charge nurse, and if they did not feel comfortable with the charge nurse to speak with Social Services or the Administrator. If a grievance cannot be solved by Social Services, then a formal grievance investigation can be requested, and the Director of Nursing and Administrator will be notified. A grievance can be filed by the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-12-05 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — patternRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure investigations were completed and/or thorough for 3 of 5 residents (Resident 40, 35 and 14) reviewed for investigations. This failure to initiate and complete thorough investigations placed residents at risk for unidentified accidents, abuse/neglect and serious injuries. Findings included . Review of the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, dated October 2015 (sixth edition), all incidents of abuse, neglect, abandonment, mistreatment, injuries of unknown source, personal and/or financial exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property must be thoroughly investigated. A thorough investigation was a systematic collection of a review of evidence/information that describes and explains an event or a series of events to determine what occurred and make necessary changes to a resident's plan of care and services to prevent recurrence. The investigation should include the who, what, when, why and how, of the incident and establish a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, comfortable environment was maintained for 2 of 3 shower rooms (East Hall and North Hall), reviewed for environment. This failure placed the residents at risk of an unpleasant, uncomfortable living environment, and safety hazards. Findings included. Review of the maintenance logbook for November 2025, and December 2025, showed no entries for repair of the East Hall shower room. East Hall Shower Room An observation on 12/02/2025 at 7:31AM, showed the East Hall shower room with three feet (ft-unit of measure) by four ft divider wall with multiple loose, cracked, chipped, and black/brown stained tiles on the shower floor that connected to the base of the divider wall. On the corner of the divider wall was a 12 inch (in-unit of measure) by 10 in corner section of the divider wall without tile that exposed a black/brown substance and yellow and white flaky wall debris that crumbled when touched. On the top of the edge of divider wall was a two in tile that was cracked in half with sharp…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote and protect the rights of each resident, including being treated with dignity and respect, for 2 of 2 dining experiences (breakfast meal on 12/02/2025 and lunch meal on 12/05/2025), and 2 of 5 residents (Residents 35 and 51) reviewed for dignity. This failure had the potential to result in emotional distress for failed to treat residents in a dignified manner and honor their rights. Findings included . Review of the facility policy dated 12/01/2024, titled, Person Centered Care Philosophy/Resident Rights, showed the facility will ensure that the resident can exercise his or her rights without interference, coercion, discrimination, or reprisal from the facility. Federal and state laws guarantee certain basic rights to all residents of the facility and include the right to a dignified existence, be free from abuse, participate in care planning and treatment, and be supported by the facility to exercise their rights. Resident 35…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolatedPrevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary psychotropic medications (drugs that affects how the brain works, and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings or behavior) when they did not monitor resident specific behaviors or consistently attempt non-pharmacological interventions (alternative treatment of a resident's symptoms that do not involve medications and directed toward understanding, preventing and relieving a resident's distress or loss of abilities) prior to psychotropic medication use for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 54) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. This failure placed residents at an increased risk for falls, experiencing medication-related adverse side effects, and unmet care needsFindings included .Review of the policy titled, Antipsychotic (a type of drug that balances chemicals in the brain to manage symptoms of psychosis [when someone loses touch with reality]) Medication use, dated 01/2021, showed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure allegations of abuse/neglect involving unwitnessed events with substantial injuries were reported to the State Agency (SA), as required for 1 of 4 residents (Residents 35), reviewed for accidents. The failure to report to the SA resulted in the facility's inability to recognize patterns of potential abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . Review of the Nursing Home Guidelines The Purple Book dated October 2015, sixth edition showed, Immediate reporting is required when there is reasonable cause to believe abuse, neglect, abandonment, mistreatment, personal and/or financial exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property has occurred. Substantial injuries of unknown source must be reported within 24 hours if, through the process of a thorough investigation, the injury is not considered reasonably related to a disease process or known sequence of events. Resident 35 Review of Resident 35's medical record showed the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that resident's received appropriate care and services for dialysis (a medical therapy that removes waste products, excess fluids, and toxins from the bloodstream) that were consistent with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 7) reviewed for dialysis. The facility did not provide ongoing monitoring or assessment of Resident 7's condition, including obtaining vital signs upon return to the facility after dialysis. The facility also failed to establish an effective, coordinated process for communication with the offsite dialysis center to promote continuity of care. In addition, the facility did not develop or implement an individualized care plan addressing the resident's dialysis needs, associated risks, and required post-dialysis monitoring. This failure placed the resident's at risk for unrecognized complications and adverse outcomes following dialysis. Findings included. Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including end-stage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide food that accommodated food preferences for 2 of 4 sample residents (Resident 9 and 51), reviewed for preferences. This failure placed the resident at risk for decreased dietary intake and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Resident 9 Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Lewy bodies dementia (a brain disorder that causes problems with thinking, movement and behaviors due to a buildup of protein clumps [Lewy bodies] in the brain that leads to memory loss and confusion) and heart disease. Review of the 10/07/2025 comprehensive assessment showed the resident was able to make their needs known and required assistance with using utensils to bring food to their mouth and to monitor swallowing once a meal was served. During an observation and concurrent interview on 12/02/2025 at 12:00 PM, Resident 9 was served chicken nuggets and French fries. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-12-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure foods were stored in a clean, dry and sanitary manner and in accordance with professional standards of cleanliness and food safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, 1 of 1 ice machine, and 1 of 1 dry storage room reviewed for food safety. This failure placed residents at risk for ingestion of contaminated food or beverages, cross contamination, and a potential food borne illness. Findings included .Review of the Washington State Retail Food Code dated, March 01, 2022, showed Food must be protected from contamination by storing food: In a clean, dry location, where it is not exposed to splash, dust, or other contamination. At least six inches (a unit of measure) above the floor. Food in packages and working containers may be stored less than six inches above the floor on case lot handling equipment. Kitchen During an observation and concurrent interview on 12/02/2025 at 6:21 AM, initial kitchen tour showed the kitchen ceiling had black dirt buildup on the pipes and ventilation fan. Further observation of the top of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-09 · tag F0568 — patternProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure quarterly (every three months) personal fund statements were provided to residents and/or resident representative (RR) for 3 of 5 sampled residents (Resident 20, 23, and 27) reviewed for personal fund accounts. This failure placed residents at risk of not having an accurate accounting of their personal funds held in trust by the facility. Findings included . <Resident 20> Review of the medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include Parkinson's disease (a brain disorder that causes unintended or uncontrollable movements, such as shaking, stiffness, and difficulty with balance and coordination). The 10/01/2024 comprehensive assessment showed the resident required extensive assistance of two staff members for activities of daily living (ADL's basic care needs) and had severely impaired cognition. During an interview on 12/03/2024 at 9:33 AM, the RR stated they had not received any statements regarding Resident 20's personal funds. <Resident 23> Review of the medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 32 citations
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — patternHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to have a system in place to promptly resolve grievances that were voiced in Resident Council (a formal meeting for facility residents to communicate preferences and concerns) for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 9) who expressed concerns about broken medical equipment that had been reported during the meeting and not resolved. Additionally, 4 of 4 residents (Residents 13, 4, 6 and 33) who regularly attended Resident Council were unaware of how to file a grievance (a formal complaint by a resident or resident representative [RR]) or who the facility Grievance Officer was. These failures placed residents at risk for overall dissatisfaction with their lives and unresolved concerns. Findings included . Record review of a facility policy titled Resident Grievance updated 09/2023 showed a grievance was defined as a complaint or concern that a resident had about care, services, or any other problem that may arise during their stay. The Grievance Officer is the Social Services Director. The Director of Nursing or the Administrator…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-09 · tag F0645 — patternPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, a process to determine if a potential nursing home resident had mental health/intellectual disability needs which required further assessment/treatment) assessment accurately reflected residents' mental health conditions for 2 of 5 residents (Resident 16 and 8) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed residents at risk for inappropriate nursing home placement and/or not receiving timely and necessary services to meet their mental health needs. Findings included . <Resident 16> Review of the resident's medical records showed they admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include a stroke (when the supply of blood to the brain is reduced or blocked completely, which prevents brain tissue from getting oxygen and nutrients) and depression (a mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest). The 10/23/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 16's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-09 · tag F0699 — patternProvide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was a trauma survivor received culturally competent, trauma-informed care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 12, 27, and 38) reviewed for trauma informed care. The facility failed to identify triggers (a stimulus that causes a reaction, often an emotional or physical response) regarding history of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD, a mental health that is triggered by a terrifying event) and interventions. This failure placed the residents at risk for unidentified triggers and re-traumatization. Findings included . <Resident 12> Review of the medical record showed Resident 12 was re-admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include end stage kidney disease with kidney dialysis (process of cleaning waste from the blood artificially), heart disease and failure, left above the knee amputation, and amputation of their penis due to gangrene (death of tissue due…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide routine and repair maintenance services for a safe and sanitary environment in 1 of 1 kitchen. This failure placed residents at risk for infection by not having cleanable and maintained surfaces. Findings included . <Floor under the Oven/ Oven top dust> An observation on 12/02/2024 at 9:20 AM, showed the kitchen floor under the oven's right leg support, had an uncleanable, broken, and missing area of rubberized concrete which measured 6 inches by 4 inches. During an observation on 12/02/2024 at 9:23 AM, showed the top of the oven had several stainless steel appliances and inserts used for the steam table that were piled on top of the dusty oven. <Leaky Faucets> An observation on 12/02/2024 at 9:30 AM, showed the clean sink area had a leaking water faucet. Additional observations on 12/05/2024 at 11:10 AM and 12/15/2024 at 11:15 AM, showed the water leak had increased to the second faucet. During an interview with Staff FF, Dietary Manager, stated they had previously reported the issue a week before to Staff I,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care that maintained a resident's dignity for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident 12) reviewed for dignity. This failure placed the resident not able to maintain their bowel continence (using the commode) status and only received one shower a week. These failures caused embarrassment for bowel incontinent accidents and lack of shower/cleanliness before going to appointments and family visits. This placed the resident at risk for decreased quality of life. Findings included . <Resident 12> Review of the medical record showed Resident 12 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a fracture of the right lower leg and no weight bearing to the right leg. Diagnoses include end stage kidney disease with kidney dialysis (process of cleaning waste from the blood artificially), heart disease and failure, left above the knee amputation, diabetes (disease that occurs when your blood sugar is too high), gangrene (death of tissue due to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolatedEnsure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to comprehensively assess and monitor the need of physical restraints (posey (a brand of roll bolsters, an alternative to bed side rails to help protect alert patients from rolling out of the bed) for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 30 and 39) reviewed for physical restraints. In addition, the facility failed to obtain consents in the language the resident was able to read/understand, to document ongoing re-evaluation for the need of the restraint, and to ensure a least restrictive intervention were attempted prior to the use of the restraint. This failed practice placed residents at risk for a diminished quality of life, freedom of movement in their bed, and skin breakdown. Findings included . <Resident 30> Review of the resident's medical record showed they admitted with diagnoses to include a mood disorder (a group of mental conditions that affect a person's general emotional state) and heart failure. The 10/22/2024 comprehensive assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a significant change assessment had been completed for 2 of 4 residents (Resident 9 and 30) reviewed for hospice and end of life care. This failed practice placed the residents at risk for unmet care needs due to their imminent decline and/or improvement in health. Findings included . Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual (helps nursing home staff in gathering definitive information on a resident's strengths and needs, which must be addressed in an individualized care plan), dated October 2024, showed it was a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS, a federal agency that administers health programs for seniors and people with disabilities) requirement to complete a significant change assessment (SCA) every time the hospice benefit had been selected and was also required if the resident came off of the hospice benefit. Additionally, the RAI manual showed a SCA should be completed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I form (a screening tool used to determine if a resident requires further evaluation for serious mental illness or intellectual disability), was updated when the resident was newly diagnosed with mental health concerns for 1 of 5 residents (Resident 7) reviewed for PASARR accuracy. This failed practice placed the resident at risk for health and/or emotional decline related to the lack of a professional evaluation to determine if further mental health interventions were required. Findings included . <Resident 7> Review of the resident's medical records showed the resident admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include depression (a mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness and loss of interest) and blindness. Review of Resident 7's July 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR), showed an order on 07/17/2024 for Ativan (a brand of medication used to treat anxiety [a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident care plans (CPs) were reviewed, revised, and accurately reflected resident care needs for 2 of 5 sampled residents (Residents 38 and 39) whose CPs were reviewed for accuracy. These failures placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and psychosocial interventions to maintain current preferences. Findings included . <Resident 38> Review of the medical record showed the resident had been at the facility for over one year with diagnoses to include dementia (cognitive impairment) with behaviors, history of hip fractures with falls and anxiety. The 11/15/2024 comprehensive assessment showed the resident was cognitively impaired but able to determine their needs and express them clearly. Resident 38 used a wheelchair for mobility. The 11/15/2024 quarterly assessment showed the resident did not demonstrate any mood to resistive behaviors. Additionally, the quarterly assessment showed no impairment of vision or hearing.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary care and services to ensure Restorative Aide (RA) Nursing programs were consistently provided for 3 of 5 residents (Resident's 21, 39, and 9) reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs, basic tasks people perform regularly to care for themselves). This failure placed residents at risk for avoidable decline in function and a diminished ability to reach their highest practicable level of well being. Findings included . Record review of a facility policy titled Rehabilitation Nursing Care revised 10/21 showed; The facility Rehabilitative Nursing Program was designed to assist each resident to achieve and maintain an optimal level of self care and independence. Through the resident care plan the goals of rehabilitation are reinforced. <Resident 21> Review of the residents medical record showed they were admitted to the facility with diagnoses including, dementia (a disease that effects brain function such as memory and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide meaningful and engaging activities for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 38), that do not participate in activities. Resident 38 did not participate in activities designed for someone who could not see well and had difficulty hearing which was relevant to their mental state. This placed the resident at risk of decreased interactions with people, a decreased meaning to their life, and a decreased mental well-being. Findings included . <Resident 38> Review of the medical record showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cataracts (opacity of the lens of the eyes), dementia (cognitive impairment), and multiple falls with fracture. The 11/15/2024 quarterly assessment showed for Preferences for Daily and Routine activities showed reading books and newspaper was not important to the resident. Resident 38 could make their needs known and used a wheelchair to wheel themselves around the facility. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice regarding ongoing skin assessments for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 37 and 8) reviewed for skin impairment. Additionally, the facility failed to follow physicians' orders to obtain specialized services timely for 2 of 5 Residents (Resident 9 and 20) reviewed for Range of motion (ROM). The facility's failure to provide the care and services required related to non-pressure skin issues and specialized services placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or avoidable decline, delay in treatment, pain/discomfort, and unmet care needs. Findings included . Review of the 01/2021 Urostomy Care procedure showed the purposes were to promote cleanliness and to protect the peristomal skin (skin around the stoma) where the urostomy (surgically constructed opening in the bladder/urinary tract allowing urine to flow through an opening outside the body) is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's bathroom had safe and functional Durable Medical Equipment (DME, medically necessary equipment used by people with a medical condition, disability, or injury) for 1 of 3 sampled residents (Resident 9) reviewed for accident hazards. This failure placed the resident at risk for falls, injuries, and decreased independence. Findings included . <Resident 9> Review of the resident's medical record showed the resident admitted with diagnoses to include lower back pain and anxiety (a feeling of worry, nervousness, or unease, typically about an imminent event or something with an uncertain outcome). The 09/11/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 9's cognition was moderately impaired and they had not experienced any falls since admission. An observation and concurrent interview on 12/03/2024 at 9:53 AM, showed Resident 9 sitting in their wheelchair, self-propelling in their room. Observation of Resident 9's bathroom, showed a toilet seat riser (a portable toilet seat that provides…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of unnecessary psychotropic medications (any medication capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 7 and 16) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility failed to consistently develop, monitor, and implement individualized targeted behaviors and ensure as needed (PRN) psychotropic medications were limited to 14-days or had a documented rationale for the extended use. Additionally, the facility failed to consistently obtain informed consent for the use of psychotropic medications. These failures placed residents at an increased risk for experiencing medication-related adverse side effects, and a decreased independence for making their own informed decisions. Findings included . <Resident 7> Review of the resident's medical records showed they admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include depression (a mood disorder that causes persistent feelings of sadness and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide access of an interpreter for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 1) reviewed for communication. This failure resulted in miscommunications between the resident, family and facility staff placing Resident 1 at risk for frustration and unmet care needs. Findings included . The undated facility policy Crescent Health Care Auxiliary Aids and Services for Persons with Disabilities showed for persons who are deaf or hard of hearing and who use sign language as their primary means of communication, the social services staff will provide white boards and pens for effective communication with residents. Persons who are deaf may request family members or friend as interpreters however, family members or friends will not be used as interpreters unless specifically requested by that individual and after and offer of an interpreter at no charge to the resident. <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed the resident had diagnoses including deafness (complete hearing loss), heart disease, diabetes (when blood sugar is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to assess a change in condition in a timely manner for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for quality of care. This failure caused delay in treatment when they complained of abdominal pain. These failures placed Resident 1 at risk for unmanaged pain. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1with diagnoses including deaf-nonspeaking, urinary retention with urinary catheter, chronic Urinary Tract Infections (UTI), pain in right hip and knee, heart failure and kidney failure. The resident was alert and oriented used sign language, writing on a white board with an erasable marker for communication. Review of the comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed Resident 1 had a urinary catheter and required oxygen. The resident required assistance of one staff member with Activities of Daily Living. <Urinary Catheter> During an interview on 09/05/2024 at 9:10 AM, Resident 1 stated on 08/25/2024 Staff F, Nursing Assistant…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a cleanable and sanitary environment for 3 of 10 resident rooms (rooms [ROOM NUMBER]) the tiles were worn with cracks between the tiles that were not cleanable. There was a black sticky substance between the tiles on the flooring. This failure placed staff and residents at an increased risk for infectious diseases and non-functional resident environment related to uncleanable flooring surfaces. Findings included . <room [ROOM NUMBER]> During an observation on 09/05/2024 at 10:20 AM, the flooring in room [ROOM NUMBER] located on the right side of the resident's bed showed a five feet (ft-unit of measure) by four ft area of white tile that was discolored to a blackish-brown color. There were several areas of black sticky substance between the square floor tiles. The under flooring was showing through the seams of the tiles. There were multiple indentations in the flooring that were uncleanable. During an interview on 09/05/2024 at 10:30 AM, Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free of abuse when Staff D, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) utilized verbal abuse and intimidation during cares for 3 of 4 residents (Resident 1, 2, and 3) reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for unrecognized emotional harm, mental anguish, and the potential for additional abuse. Findings included . <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of bacterial pneumonia (an infection in the lungs caused by bacteria), chronic respiratory failure (a condition in which the blood does not have enough oxygen), anxiety (feelings of fear or uneasiness), and supplemental oxygen dependence (delivery of concentrated oxygen from a device to aide breathing). Review of the comprehensive assessment, dated 12/04/2023, showed Resident 1 was cognitively intact and required the assistance of one person for dressing, transfers, personal hygiene,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-28 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse to the State Agency for 1 of 4 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. This deficient practice placed residents at risk for unidentified and potential ongoing abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . According to the Nursing Home Guidelines, The Purple Book, dated October 2015 (sixth edition), a nursing home employee (or other mandated reporter) is required to make a report if they had reasonable cause to believe abuse, neglect, abandonment, mistreatment, personal and/or financial exploitation, or misappropriation of resident property has occurred. It also showed, Federal law requires the facility to report all allegations of abuse or neglect. <Resident 1> Review of the medical record showed Resident 1 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of bacterial pneumonia (an infection in the lungs caused by bacteria), chronic respiratory failure (a condition in which the blood does not have enough…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-31 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document in the medical record any discussions regarding Advanced Directives (AD), including incorporation into the care planning process, for 4 of 5 residents (Residents 12, 28, 50 and 46) reviewed for AD. This failure placed the residents at risk of losing their right to have their preferences/decisions followed regarding end-of-life care. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Resident Self Determination Policies, dated 05/2006, showed at the time of admission, the facility will provide information concerning (i) an adult individual's right to make decisions concerning medical care, including the right to accept or refuse medical treatment or surgical treatment and the right to give advance directives; (ii) the facility's policy relating to implementation of these rights. Additionally, the facility would document in each resident's medical record whether or not the resident had executed an AD. Review of State Operations Manual,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0569 — isolatedNotify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the conveyance of funds in a resident trust fund account occurred within 30 days following their death, for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 69), reviewed for conveyance of resident funds. This failure placed the state department at risk for loss of funds and interest accumulated. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated policy titled, Conveyance of Funds Upon a Resident's Death/Discharge, showed within 30 days of the death of the resident, the facility would return the deceased resident's personal funds .if the resident was on Medicaid, the funds would be returned to the Office of Financial recovery. <Resident 69> Review of Resident 69's medical record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] and passed away on [DATE]. The resident had $11.02 personal funds remaining in their facility held trust account. Review of Resident 69's trust fund account showed the balance of $11.02 had not been returned to the Office of Financial…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure privacy was provided during toileting for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 45 and 50) reviewed for personal privacy. This failure placed the residents at risk for embarrassment and a lack of dignified care. Findings included . <Resident 45> Review of the medical record showed Resident 45 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anxiety, depression, and a history of falls. The comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident required supervision of one staff member for transfers and toileting. The assessment also showed the resident was cognitively intact. During an interview on 10/24/2023 at 9:52 AM, Resident 45 stated they did not have privacy when using the restroom and were unable to independently shut the door to the restroom when they used the toilet. Resident 45 further stated there was an incident of a resident that wandered in their room while getting dressed a week ago. Resident 45 stated that it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect when staff failed to provide a wheelchair in good working condition for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 50) reviewed for neglect. This failed practice put Resident 50 at risk for further accidents secondary to the facility not acting to repair the brakes on the resident's wheelchair that were not working. Findings included . Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse and Neglect - Clinical Protocol, dated 01/2020, showed the definition of neglect was failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness. Further review showed the facility management and staff will institute measures to address the needs of residents and minimize the possibility of abuse and neglect. <Resident 50> Review of the medical record showed Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including surgical amputation (loss or removal of a body part)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-31 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect was reported to the State Agency as required for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 50) reviewed for neglect. Failure to report allegations of neglect placed residents at risk for additional neglect. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Abuse and Neglect - Clinical Protocol, dated 01/2020, showed the definition of neglect as failure to provide goods and services necessary to avoid physical harm, mental anguish, or mental illness. Review of the Nursing Home Guidelines titled, The Purple Book, dated October 2015, showed the facility must ensure that all alleged violations involving mistreatment, neglect, or abuse .are reported immediately to the administrator of the facility and to other officials in accordance with State law .including to the State survey and certification agency. <Resident 50> Review of the medical record showed Resident 50 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide written bed hold information prior to transfers to an acute care hospital for 2 of 4 residents (Resident 42 and 9) reviewed for hospital discharge. This failure placed the residents at risk for lack of knowledge of the right to hold their bed while in the hospital. Findings included . <Resident 42> Review of Resident 42's medical record showed they were admitted to the facility with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other brain functions). Review of the most recent comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance from staff for activities of daily living (daily activities such as mobility. dressing, personal hygiene and grooming). Review of Resident 42's progress notes showed they were sent to the hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of urinary tract infection and sepsis (an infection in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop a base line care plan within 48 hours of admission to include resident specific initial goals and treatment plans for 1 of 3 newly admitted residents (Resident 28) reviewed for base line care plan. This failure placed the resident at risk for a lack of continuity of care and unmet care needs. Findings included . <Resident 28> Review of Resident 28's medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included, left leg fractures, Parkinson's (a progressive disease that damages nerves) and anxiety. The most recent comprehensive assessment dated [DATE] showed the resident was cognitively impaired and required extensive assistance from two staff for bed mobility, transfers, personal hygiene and grooming. Review of Resident 28's initial care plan dated 08/19/2023 showed that it did not have the required components for a 48 hour baseline care plan which included, medications, dietary orders, and goals of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate pain control for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 48) reviewed for pain. This failure resulted in Resident 48 experiencing severe pain during an indwelling catheter (a hollow tube inserted into the bladder through the penis to drain urine) exchange (procedure to replace previous indwelling catheter with a new one). This failure to recognize and implement pain interventions to minimize pain for Resident 48 caused inadequate pain control and a diminished quality of life when their pain was unrelieved during the indwelling catheter exchange. Findings included . <Resident 48> Review of the medical record showed Resident 48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD [a lung disease that causes difficult breathing]), urinary retention (inability to pass urine) with an indwelling catheter, and palliative care (specialized care for serious illnesses). The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-31 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 4 residents (Resident 28), reviewed for unnecessary medications, had an adequate indication for use of a psychotropic medication (a class of medication that affects brain activity of mental functioning and behavior) based on clinical rationale. Additionally, the facility failed to provide sufficient monitoring for adverse side effects (ASE, unwanted, undesirable effects that are possibly related to medication) with the use of an antipsychotic medication (a class of psychotropic medication with a high risk for ASE). This failure placed Resident 28 at risk for a deterioration in their mental and physical health status. Findings included . Record review of an Alzheimer's Society August 2021 article titled Antipsychotics and other drug approaches in dementia care showed .the decision to use an antipsychoic drug for dementia care should be taken very seriously, benefits may impact the person's health and quality of life…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. Two medication errors were identified for 2 of 11 residents (Residents 50 and 37) observed during 25 medication administration opportunities, that resulted in an error rate of 8%. Errors in medication administration had the potential to place residents at risk for not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medication and possible adverse side effects. Findings included . Review of the Instructions for use an insulin pen, by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, (USFDA) dated 11/2018, showed to keep the needle in the skin for at least 10 seconds, and keep the push button pressed all the way in until the needle has been pulled out of the skin. This process is to ensure the full dosage was provided. In addition, the Instructions for use stated to prime the insulin pen before each injection. Priming is meant to remove air from the needle and cartridge that may collect during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure one of one medication storage room (South Hall), one of one medication storage refrigerator, and one of three medication carts (North Hall) were free from expired medications. This failed practice placed the residents at risk for receiving expired medication and/or experiencing compromised or ineffective medications. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled, Storage of Medications, revised 09/2022, showed the facility shall not use discontinued or outdated medications and all medications should be returned to the dispensing pharmacy or destroyed. During an observation on 10/26/2023 at 12:46 PM, the following expired medications were found : < Intravenous ([IV] medications administered into a vein) medication cart located in medication storage room> Two vials of Lidocaine 1% (numbing medication). Expired 07/2023 Two syringes of Heparin 500 units (used to prevent blood clots). Expired 08/2021 and 04/2022 One syringe of Heparin 50 units Expired 06/2023 One intravenous (IV) bag 500…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-10-09 · tag F0882 — widespreadDesignate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the designated Infection Preventionist (IP) met the qualifications for experience, education, and training or certification for the role to assume responsibility for the facility's Infection Prevention Control Program (IPCP). This failure placed residents, family members, and staff at risk of contracting communicable diseases. Findings included . Record review of the facility's undated policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, showed that .at least one Health Care Provider (HCP) would be assigned and trained as the Infection Preventionist to provide on-site management of the Infection Prevention and Control Program. During an interview on 10/03/2023 at 12:30 PM, Staff A, Administrator, stated that they did not currently have an IP and that Staff B, Director of Nurses (DON), was taking on that role. Staff A further stated Staff B had not received the certified IP training. During an interview on 10/03/2023 at 2:05 PM, Staff B, stated that there was no one certified for the IP position, and they were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement their Respiratory Protection Program (RPP) to ensure resident and staff safety by not completing annual respiratory mask fit testing (a test conducted to verify that a respirator is both comfortable and provides the wearer with the expected protection) for 16 of 78 staff reviewed for annual fit testing and annual respiratory training. This failed practice put all residents at risk for developing communicable diseases and infections. Findings included . Record review of the February 2022 guidance from the Washington State Department of Health titled, Respiratory Protection Program for Long-Term Care Facilities, showed the program included a medical evaluation to determine whether it was safe for employees to use respirators, completion of respirator training before the first use of a respirator, and respirator fit testing initially and annually thereafter. Review of the facility's undated RPP policy, showed employees were required to receive respirator mask fit testing to ensure proper size and fit, and training…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$245,834 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $19,135 — penalty dated 2026-03-11
- $52,767 — penalty dated 2025-12-05
- $116,471 — penalty dated 2024-12-09
- $57,461 — penalty dated 2023-10-09
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-09 for 12 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HARRINGTON, MOLLY | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; W-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE | 100% | since 02/01/2006 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 2 rows in the source record cover these 1 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in WA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505085. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-12-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.