No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Willow Springs Care And Rehabilitation

4007 Tieton Drive, Yakima, WA 98908 · For profit - Corporation · 75 certified beds · (509) 966-4500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited May 2026Resident-funds citation (F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2026
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0569)
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (38) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
1/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
120 S 72nd Ave Ste 102 · (509) 902-8856 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
6600 W Nob Hill Blvd · (509) 966-3814 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Rosauers0.2 mi
410 S 72nd Ave · (509) 972-2327 · Call to confirm hours
Park
(509) 574-2435 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased15.9%14.2%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight14.2%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder3.9%1.0%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.2%1.6%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms30.1%17.7%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.1%2.6%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.4%17.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.0%12.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%93.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.1%4.3%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.1%22.5%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.7%15.1%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication3.8%1.3%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.4%82.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.7%19.9%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.7%13.4%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.951.331.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.631.521.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

60.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 131 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

60.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
7.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
57.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.41U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.23hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 57.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 64 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF60.8%CMS range 52.9–67.951.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF7.9%CMS range 4.9–13.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge57.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge67.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge65.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay2.3%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.5%CMS range 4.1–12.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.051.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.95
RN hours/ resident / day
0.61
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.59
Aide hours/ resident / day
4.15
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.88
RN hoursweekends
55.7%
Total nursing turnover
56.3%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 75 beds and averages 58.4 residents a day — about 78% occupied, or roughly 17 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.15 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.59 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.50 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.41 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.98 to 0.88 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-07-25)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-10)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

38 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2023-07-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's smoking location was away from a high traffic thoroughfare, dry grassy area, and had a receptacle for disposing of lit cigarettes and ashes for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 30) reviewed for smoking This failure placed all residents a risk for avoidable accidents, injuries, and the potential risk of fire. On 07/17/2023 At 2:10 PM, the facility was notified of an immediate jeopardy (IJ) at CFR 483.25 (d)(1)(2) F689, related to the facility's failure to ensure the resident had a safe smoking environment, and all residents remained free of fire risks. The facility removed the immediacy on 07/18/2023, with onsite verification from investigators, by providing a safe smoking location on the facility property and a cigarette receptacle for the resident to dispose of cigarettes and ashes. Additionally, the facility provided education to the resident and all staff of the location and the safe disposal practice. Findings…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-05-26 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from verbal and physical abuse for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 1) reviewed for abuse investigations. This failure placed residents at risk for further abuse, injury, and diminished quality of life.Findings included .Record review of the facility's policy titled, Abuse Prevention Program, dated 10/01/2021, showed that the residents had the right to be free from abuse and the facility would protect residents from abuse by anyone including other residents. Resident 1 Record review showed Resident 1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include multiple sclerosis (a potentially disabling disease of the brain and spinal cord) and depression. Record review of the 03/12/2026 comprehensive assessment showed that Resident 1 had moderate cognitive impairment and used a wheelchair for mobility. Record review of Resident 1's 03/09/2026 care plan showed they enjoyed socializing one-to-one with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-07-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) store Potentially Hazardous Food (PHF, food that requires time/temperature controlled to limit the growth of bacteria) that did not have the proper labels and dates for food safety tracking, 2) adequately disinfected food preparation areas to prevent cross contamination (harmful spread of diseases) for 1of 1 kitchen reviewed and 3) ensure the dishwasher sanitizer concentration was effective for sanitation for 1of 1 kitchen reviewed. These failures placed residents at an increased risk for food borne illnesses. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to 1) store Potentially Hazardous Food (PHF, food that requires time/temperature controlled to limit the growth of bacteria) that did not have the proper labels and dates for food safety tracking, 2) adequately disinfected food preparation areas to prevent cross contamination (harmful spread of diseases) for 1of 1 kitchen reviewed and 3) ensure the dishwasher…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-07-25 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, and sanitary environment for 2 of 2 shower rooms (Hall Two and Hall One), 2 of 3 resident bathrooms (Hall One) and 1 of 1 laundry room reviewed for a safe and sanitary environment. This failure placed residents at an increased risk for not feeling safe and secure with their environment and unmet care needs.Findings included… <Hall Two Shower Room>During an observation on 07/20/2025 at 10:18 AM, the shower room located on hall two showed three feet (a unit of measure) along the shower wall, a black slimy substance that extended upwards three inches (a unit of measure) onto the wall tiles. To the left side of the shower entrance, there were missing tiles on the corner exposing dry wall, measuring four by five inches. To the left of the sink, a deep gauge was observed on the wall measuring three inches with drywall exposed. Further to the left of the sink, another area showed a deep gauge measuring eight inches by one inch, also…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-25 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of significant changes in condition for 1 of 3 Residents (Resident 4), reviewed for falls. This failure placed the resident at risk for delayed medical interventions and treatment. Findings included . Review of the undated policy titled Change in Residents Condition or Status showed a significant change of condition was a decline in the residents' status that would not normally resolve itself without intervention from staff. The nurse would notify the residents attending Physician or on-call Physician when there had been a significant change in the resident's physical, emotional or mental condition. <Resident 4>Review of Resident 4's medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses to include heart failure and hypertension (high blood pressure, when the blood is pushing too hard against the artery walls). Review of the significant change assessment, dated 06/24/2025, showed the resident's cognition was intact and required the assistance of one- two staff members for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-25 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and validate the Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews ([PASARR], an assessment to ensure individuals with serious mental illness [SMI] or intellectual disabilities [ID] or related disorders [RD] are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) were corrected on admission, had the required level 2 referral sent if residents had a positive Level 1 PASARR nor corrected/updated resident PASARR as needed for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 11 and 16) reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the residents at risk for not receiving the care and services appropriate for their needs. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and validate the Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews ([PASARR], an assessment to ensure individuals with serious mental illness [SMI] or intellectual disabilities [ID] or related disorders [RD] are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) were corrected on admission, had the required Level 2 referral sent if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-09-10 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure funds were reimbursed to the State Office of Financial Recovery (OFR), within 30 days of a resident's discharge or death, for 4 of 4 residents (Residents 252, 253, 254, and 255), reviewed for personal funds. This failure placed the state department at risk for loss of funds and interest accumulated. Findings included . Review of the undated policy titled, Resident Trust Funds, showed within 30 days of death of the resident, the facility would return the resident's personal funds. If the resident received long-term care services paid by the department, the personal funds would be sent to the Office of Financial Recovery. <Resident 252> Review of Resident 252's medical record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] and passed away on 06/08/2024. The resident had $100.08 personal funds remaining in their trust account. Review of Resident 252's trust account showed the balance of $100.08 had not been returned to the Office of financial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-10 · tag F0645 — pattern
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review and validate the Preadmission Screening and Resident Reviews ([PASARR], an assessment to ensure individuals with serious mental illness [SMI] or intellectual/developmental disabilities [ID/DD] are not inappropriately placed in nursing homes for long term care) were corrected on admission, had the required level 2 referral sent if residents had a positive Level 1 PASARR nor corrected/updated resident PASARR as needed for 4 of 9 residents (Resident 21, 27, 47 and 49) reviewed for PASARR. This failure placed the residents at risk for not receiving the care and services appropriate for their needs. Findings included . Review of the Department of Social and Health Services, Dear Nursing Home Administrator Letter, guidance titled, Clarification to the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR or PASRR) Level 1 Screening Process, dated 07/06/2024, showed a positive level one PASARR screen (that would then require a referral for a level two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were discarded when expired for 2 of 3 medication carts (Team 1 and Team 3). The facility also failed to ensure consistent monitoring of temperature for the medication storage refrigerator located in the medication storage room. These failures placed residents at risk for receiving expired medication and/or experiencing compromised or ineffective medications and vaccines. Findings included . Review of the policy titled, Medication Storage in the Facility, dated 07/2021, showed outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications are immediately removed from inventory and disposed of according to facility procedures for medication disposal. The policy also showed medications, biologicals and vaccines were stored at their required temperatures. Additionally, vaccines stored in the medication refrigerator were to be monitored twice daily per the Center for Disease Control (CDC). Review of the CDC guidance titled, Vaccine Storage and Handling, dated 04/03/2024, showed to ensure safety of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff maintained components of an infection prevention control program to prevent the development and transmission of infections with, 1) hand hygiene for 4 of 8 staff (Staff P, G, H and O) reviewed during medication administration and entering/exiting isolation precautions (a process used to reduce the transmission of infectious bacteria and organisms in the healthcare setting), 2) implementing appropriate transmission based precautions (TBP, safeguards put in place to help prevent staff and residents from spreading infectious diseases) when providing care for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 33 and 34) reviewed for standard precautions, 3) cleaning/disinfecting of resident equipment and furniture for 3 of 4 types of equipment (chairs, sofa and mechanical sit-to-stand devices) and residents general/isolation precaution rooms with an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) registered disinfectant for 3 of 3 staff (Staff G, P, O) reviewed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-10 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue a written notice of bed hold (holding or reserving a resident's bed while the resident was absent from the facility) at the time of hospital transfer for 2 of 3 residents (Residents 7 and 9) reviewed for hospital transfers. This failure placed the residents at risk for lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed and any monetary charges associated with the bed hold while in the hospital. Findings included . Review of the policy titled, Bed Hold Policy Notification 2024, updated 01/11/2024, showed residents were able to retain their bed when they were discharged to the hospital or on a therapeutic leave. The resident and/or their representative must sign and return the Bed Hold Policy Notification 2024 form to the business office within 24 hours of receipt of the form if they chose to retain their bed. <Resident 7> Review of the medical record showed Resident 7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-10 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure culturally competent, trauma-informed care, related to assessing for trauma and identifying trigger-specific (a psychological stimulus that prompts recall of a previous traumatic event) interventions for residents with a history of trauma for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 14) reviewed for trauma informed care. This failed practice placed the resident at risk for unidentified triggers, re-traumatization and psychological harm. Findings included . Review of the facility's undated policy titled Trauma Informed Care Purpose, showed that social services staff were trained on screening, trauma assessment and how to identify triggers associated with re-traumatization. <Resident 14> Review of Resident 14's medical record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including insomnia (trouble sleeping) and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder [(PTSD) a mental health condition that's triggered by a terrifying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. Three medication errors were identified for 2 of 6 residents (Residents 21 and 43) observed during 25 medication administration opportunities that resulted in an error rate of 12%. The failed practice had the potential to place residents at risk for not receiving the full therapeutic effect of the medication and possible adverse side effects. Findings included . Review of the policy titled, Medication and Flexible Pass Time, dated 10/2023, showed nurses would follow the general guidelines for safe and accurate medication administration. Review of the Instructions for use (IFU) by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) revised 07/2023, stated to prime the insulin pen (a pre-filled disposable device containing insulin) with a new needle prior to each injection administration. To prime the insulin pen was to turn the dose knob to two units, hold pen and needle upright, tap pen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to send a copy of a notice of transfer/discharge to the representative of the Office of the State Long Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman (a person that advocates for residents in nursing homes) for 3 of 3 residents (Residents 2, 3, and 4) reviewed for notice of transfer/discharge. This failed practice placed the residents at risk for lack of access to an advocate that could inform them of their options and rights, and to ensure the resident advocacy agency was aware of the facility practices and activities related to a transfer or discharge. Findings included . Review of a policy titled, Admission, Transfer and Discharge - Facility Initiated Transfers and Discharges, undated, showed the facility would send a copy of the notice of transfers or discharges to a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman. <Resident 2> Review of the medical record showed Resident 2 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement an effective discharge planning process that addressed the resident's goals and needs, that involved the resident and the interdisciplinary team [(IDT) a group of healthcare professionals from different disciplines to help residents receive the care they need] for 1 of 3 residents (Resident 5) reviewed for discharge planning process. The failure to develop and implement a plan consistent with the resident's needs and expressed discharge goals, placed the resident at risk for decreased self-worth and dissatisfaction with their living situation. Findings included . <Resident 5> Review of the medical record showed Resident 5 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses including a stroke, diabetes (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood), and anxiety. The 05/14/2024 comprehensive assessment showed Resident 5 required moderate/maximum assistance of one staff member for activities of daily living. The assessment also showed Resident 5 had a moderately impaired cognition. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-07-22 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespread
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the food was palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for 7 of 7 residents (Residents 5, 38, 54, 32, 55, 46, and 27) interviewed about meal satisfaction during the Resident Council meeting, and 2 of 4 residents (Residents 49 and 30) reviewed for meal palatability. Additionally, Resident 49 was served eggs for breakfast routinely even though eggs were listed as a dislike. This failure placed the residents at risk for weight change, less than adequate nutritional intake, and dissatisfaction with meals. Findings included . Record review of the facility's policy titled, Food and Nutrition Services, dated 07/2023, showed that food and nutrition services staff will inspect food trays to ensure that the correct meal is provided to each resident, the food appears palatable and attractive, and it is served at a safe and appetizing temperature. <Meal Satisfaction> Record review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-22 · tag F0572 — pattern
    Give residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to periodically review resident rights with residents during their stay at the facility for 7 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 5, 27, 32, 38, 46, 54, and 55). This failure placed residents at risk of not understanding their rights and a reduced ability to self-advocate. Findings included . Record review of the facility's undated policy titled, admission Agreement - appendix D [facility name] Resident Rights, showed this policy did not address the review of resident rights. During an interview on 07/18/2023 at 9:09 AM, Representatives of the Resident Council (Residents 5, 27, 32, 38, 46, 54, and 55), stated that they were not aware of staff reviewing resident rights. During an interview on 07/19/2023 at 11:15 AM, Staff D, Activity Director, stated that they did not review resident rights at the Resident Council meetings. During an interview on 07/19/2023 at 11:35 AM, Staff A, Administrator, stated that the Social Services Director reviewed resident rights with residents. During an interview on 07/19/2023 at 11:44 AM, Staff E,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-22 · tag F0577 — pattern
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure current state survey results were available for 7 of 7 sampled residents (Residents 5, 27, 32, 38, 46, 54, and 55) to examine. This failure prevented residents, family members, and visitors from exercising their rights to examine these documents. Findings included . Record review of the facility's undated policy titled, admission Agreement - appendix D [facility name] Resident Rights, showed residents had the right to examine the most recent results of the facility's state survey or inspections. During an interview on 07/18/2023 at 9:09 AM, Resident Council Representatives (Residents 5, 27, 32, 38, 46, 54, and 55), stated that they did not know where state survey results were available to them to read. Observation on 07/19/2023 at 11:16 AM, showed a hard covered three-ring binder located outside of the business office. The most recent copy of state survey results in this binder was dated 03/30/2023. There were other state survey investigations, dated 05/18/2023 and 06/02/2023, that were not included in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-22 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document, periodically review, and revise Advanced Directives related to residents' wishes for 9 of 9 sampled residents (Residents 1, 7, 8, 21, 26, 30, 31, 44 and 213), reviewed for Advanced Directives. This failure prevented residents from having their health care decisions and preferences known in advance, and when they were unable to communicate this information. Findings included . Record review of the facility's undated policy titled, Advance directives (legal documents that provide instructions for medical care when a person is unable to communicate their own wishes) will be respected in accordance with state law and facility policy, showed: 1. A copy of residents' Advance Directives would be placed in their medical record. 2. The residents' decision to accept or decline an Advance Directives would be documented in the medical records. 3. The Interdisciplinary Team would conduct an annually review, with the resident, their Advance Directives. Record review of the 9 sampled residents' Electronic Health Records on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-22 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a clean and comfortable homelike environment for 7 of 10 resident rooms (rooms 2, 3, 4, 20, 32, 35 and 55), 3 of 3 shower rooms (Team 1 shower room, Team 2 shower/bath room and Team 3 shower room), and missing/damaged wood panel flooring were also observed in one of five hallways (Team 2 hallway) all reviewed for safe, comfortable, and sanitary environment, 2 of 5 hallways in resident care areas (Middle and Kitchen hallways) reviewed for comfortable sound levels. These failures placed residents at risk for a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident rooms An observation on 07/16/2023 at 2:10 PM, in room [ROOM NUMBER], showed a six-drawer dresser was missing the third drawer on the left side of the dresser. The drawer front face was off and in the corner of the room with missing particle/pressed board and sharp pieces were exposed. An observation on 07/16/2023 at 2:46 PM in room [ROOM NUMBER], showed gouges (grooves or holes) on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-22 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the coordination of care conferences for 3 of 4 residents (Residents 20, 30 and 44); and failed to update or revise care plan changes for fall interventions and resident preferences for 2 of 4 residents (1 and 30) reviewed for care plan timing and revision. This failure placed the residents at risk for unmet and unidentified care needs and decreased quality of life. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy, dated 07/2023, titled Care Conferences showed there were no procedure or processes for implementing the policy. The policy did not list the physician (or delegated Non-Physician Practitioner) as part of the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT), nor did it show how the physician would be involved. The policy listed the Nursing Assistant (NA) would be included only if applicable the policy showed no documentation how the facility would involve the resident or Resident Representative (RR). The policy further showed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-07-22 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate gradual dose reductions (GDR- stepwise tapering of a dose to determine if symptoms, conditions, or risks could be managed by a lower dose or if the dose or medication could be discontinued) or obtain a rationale from the physician or prescribing practitioner that a GDR was clinically contraindicated for 2 of 5 residents (Residents 12 and 25) reviewed for unnecessary medication; and the facility failed to ensure as-needed (PRN) psychotropic medications (medications capable of affecting the mind, emotions, and behavior) were limited to 14 days without providing a physician-documented rationale or duration for 1of 2 residents (Resident 7) reviewed for PRN psychotropic medication use. These failures placed residents at risk of being over medicated, medical complications related to the side effects, and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Record review of the facility's undated policy titled, Antipsychotic (a class of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications, biologicals, and testing supplies were labeled, dated, or discarded when expired for 1 of 1 medication room and 1 of 1 treatment cart reviewed for medication storage. These failures placed residents at risk of receiving compromised or ineffective medications. Findings included . Review of the facility's 07/2021 policy, titled Medication Storage in the facility showed, medications dispensed by the pharmacy will be kept in the container they were dispensed in with the pharmacy label. The policy further showed outdated medications will be disposed of according to the facility procedures for destroying medications. An observation on 07/20/2023 at 10:39 AM, with Staff K, Licensed Practical Nurse Care Manager in attendance, of the medication room showed: • 66- bottles of hand sanitizer, 4 fluid ounces (oz) each that expired on 03/2023. • 16 fluid oz bottle, half full bottle of hydrogen peroxide (a mild antiseptic used on the skin to prevent infection of minor cuts, scrapes, and burns) that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-07-22 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure implementation of infection prevention and control practices for for 1) hand hygiene was completed and gloves were changed by staff between soiled and clean tasks for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 40 and 59) observed for personal care, 2) hand hygiene that was not appropriately performed by 7 of 10 staff, observed during meal services, 3) failure to perform hand hygiene wound care for 1 of 2 residents (Resident 24) observed during a wound care procedure and, 4) failure to follow contact precautions for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 28) reviewed for compliance with Transmission Based Precautions. These failures placed the residents at risk for acquiring infectious diseases and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . <Soiled to Clean Task> Record review of the facility's policy titled, Catheter (a hollow, partially flexible tube that collects urine from the bladder and leads to a drainage bag) Care, dated 08/10/2023, showed that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-22 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience during two of two dining observations. On 07/16/2023, during the lunch service, the facility failed to provide meals to all residents at a table at the same time for 6 residents (Residents 33, 9, 15, 47, 31 and 1) who waited 10 minutes after Resident 42 and Resident 27 were served; and the facility failed to ensure 1 of 3 staff (Staff G) observed talked with the resident for whom they were providing assistance rather than conducting social conversations with other staff, Staff G fed Resident 33 without engaging the resident and had a conversation with Staff L, NA, that did not include the residents. On 07/19/2023 during dinner service, the facility failed to provide meals to all residents at a table at the same time for 4 o4 residents (Residents 5, 7, 32, and 55.) This failure placed residents at risk to feel diminished and disrespected. Findings included . Review of CMS §§483.10(a)-(b)(1)&(2) for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-22 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
    Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to protect the personal privacy for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 40, and 31) observed for urinary catheter (a hollow, partially flexible tube that collects urine from the bladder and leads to a drainage bag) care or incontinent care. This failure placed the resident at risk for loss of the right to personal privacy. Findings included . Record review of the facility's policy titled, Catheter Care (a process to clean a urinary catheter tube where it exits the body), dated 07/10/2023, showed that staff were to provide privacy, cover the resident with a sheet, exposing only the perineal (the area of the body between the anus and the genitals) area. Record review of the facility's undated resident admission Packet showed that the resident had the right to personal privacy that included personal care. Resident 40. Review of the resident's medical record showed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include obstructive uropathy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-22 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure three of the seven required components (identification, investigation, and reporting) in of the prevention of abuse and neglect policy were consistently implemented for 2 of 4 residents (Residents 26 and 213) reviewed for abuse/neglect. This failure prevented the facility from identifying the extent and nature of the occurrence, interview all individuals involved, and placed the residents at risk for unidentified abuse and/or neglect. Findings included . Review of the facility's policy, titled Abuse, Neglect, Mistreatment and Misappropriation of Resident Property, dated 09/21/2022, showed the facility would .identify and assess all possible incidents of abuse .Investigate and report any allegations of abuse . Resident 213. Review of the resident's Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed, the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include an infection in their urine, and alcoholism (any drinking of alcohol…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-22 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to issue a written transfer notice to a resident and/or legal representative and to the state Ombudsman for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 49 and 59) reviewed for hospitalizations. This failure placed residents at risk of not being informed of their condition, unmet care needs and a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Record review of the facility's policy titled, Transfer/Notification of Ombudsman, dated 07/2023, showed residents will be given written transfer information and reason for the transfer upon leaving the facility if they are able to understand the information. If hospitalized and they are unable to understand or family is not able to be reached, the admission Coordinator will visit the resident in the hospital the next day to review the reason for the discharge. The social service department will be responsible for notifying the state ombudsman office of all of the discharges and transfers out to include discharge to hospital .…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-22 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written bed-hold notice, at the time of transfer or within 24 hours of transfer to the hospital, for 2 of 3 Residents (Resident 49 and 59), reviewed for hospitalization. This failure placed the resident or their representative at risk for a lack of knowledge regarding their right to hold their bed while in the hospital. Findings included . Record review of the facility's policy titled, Bed-Holds and Returns, dated 07/2023, showed all resident will be given transfer / bed hold information upon leaving the facility if they are able to understand the information. If they are unable to understand or family is not able to be reached, the admission coordinator will visit the resident in the hospital the next day to review the hold policy. Record review of the facility's undated resident admission Packet showed for bed holds and readmission the facility will hold the resident's bed at no charge for up to 24 hours. Should the resident wish to have…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-22 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to accurately assess 3 of 5 residents (Residents 49, 17, and 20) whose Minimum Data Sets (MDS - an assessment tool) were reviewed. Failure to ensure accurate assessments related to Vision (Residents 49 and 17) and Communication (Resident 20), placed residents at risk for unidentified and/or unmet needs. Findings included . <Vision> Resident 49. Electronic Health Record (EHR) review showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Diabetes Mellitus (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time). Review of the 06/23/2023 Minimum Data Set comprehensive assessment showed the resident had adequate vision (sees fine detail, such as regular print in newspapers/books), did not have corrective lenses and had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the preference section of the MDS showed Resident 49 indicated it was somewhat important to have stuff to read. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-07-22 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to review the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR, a tool used to identify if a person may have an intellectual disability (ID) or related condition (RC), or a serious mental illness [SMI]) for accuracy upon admission for 1 of 6 residents (Resident 7) reviewed for PASARR services. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure a resident received a PASARR Level I ( an inital assessment to determine whether an individual might have (SMI) or (ID)) which was required prior to admission to the facility. This failure placed the residents at risk for unidentified mental health needs. Findings included . Resident 7. Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple serious mental health diagnoses to include dementia (impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), paranoid schizophrenia (a pattern of behavior where a person feels…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-22 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a Care Plan related to wearing a hearing aid for 1 of 1 sampled residents (Resident 14). This failure resulted in Resident 14 having unmet care needs and was at risk for a diminished quality of life. Findings included . Resident 14. Review of the 05/25/2023 comprehensive assessment showed that the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnosis including Anxiety and hemiparesis ( partial / complete loss of strength to one side of the body), and the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. Observation on 07/16/2023 at 9:14 AM, showed Resident 14 sat in their wheelchair watching television (TV). Resident 14 could not hear the surveyor during the survey screening process. When asked if they wore hearing aids, Resident 14 did not answer. Resident 14's roommate said Resident 14's hearing aid was at the nurse's station. Observation and interview on 07/17/2023 at 8:59 AM, showed Resident 14 was not wearing their hearing aid…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-22 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that 2 of 5 residents (Resident's 59 and 6) reviewed for dental care received goods and services to maintain their ability to perform oral care. The facility did not ensure the resident's oral care equipment was consistently set up for the residents to participate in this aspect of Activities of Daily Living (ADLs, activities related to personal care). This failure placed residents at risk for unmet care needs and a deterioration in their oral health status. Findings included . Resident 59. Review of the residents Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of a recent stroke (a condition in which the blood supply is cut off from the brain). As a result of the stroke the resident had left sided weakness and dysphagia (impaired ability to swallow). Review of Resident 59's most current comprehensive assessment, dated 07/05/2023, showed the resident was cognitively intact and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-22 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide a one-to-one individualized activity program for cognitive stimulation for 1 of 1 sampled resident (Resident 1). This failure placed Resident 1 at risk of decreased cognitive ability and diminished quality of life. Findings included . Record review of Resident 1's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE], showed Resident 1 had memory problems and their skills for making daily decisions was moderately impaired. Record review of Resident 1's Care Area Assessment, dated 07/21/2023, showed Resident 1 had cognitive loss. Record review of Resident 1's Care Plan, dated 08/02/2013, showed Resident 1 had impaired cognitive functioning related to a medical condition, and that the facility was to offer an ongoing structured activity program for intellectual stimulation. Observation on 07/16/2023 at 11:24 AM, showed Resident 1 sat in their wheelchair and watched television (TV). Observation on 07/17/2023 at 8:41 AM and at 10:00 AM, showed Resident 1 sat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to consistently follow physician ordered eating recommendations for 1 of 1 resident (Resident 59) reviewed for safe swallowing guidelines. This failure placed the resident at risk for choking, aspiration (a condition where food or liquids are breathed into the lungs), and an overall decline in their health status. Findings included . Resident 59. Review of the resident's Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] following a stroke (damage to the brain from an interruption in blood flow) and dysphagia (impaired ability to safely swallow). The EHR showed the resident had a gastrostomy tube (GT a tube inserted into the abdomen) placed on 06/23/2023 while at the hospital to maintain their hydration and nutritional status and their inability to safely swallow food and liquids. The most current comprehensive assessment, dated 07/05/2023, showed the resident was cognitively intact and required total…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-22 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and assistive devices to maintain their vision for 2 of 3 residents (Resident 49 and 59) reviewed for vision. Failure to assist residents to obtain vision services/devices, placed the residents at risk for decreased self-care, social interaction and participation in activities. Findings included . Resident 49. Electronic Health Record (EHR) review showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Diabetes Mellitus (a metabolic disorder in which the body has high sugar levels for prolonged periods of time). Review of the 06/23/2023 comprehensive assessment showed the resident had adequate vision (sees fine detail, such as regular print in newspapers/books) and moderate cognitive impairment. During an interview on 07/17/2023 at 8:54 AM, Resident 49 was in bed with the head of bed elevated. There were several facility handouts on the resident's overbed table in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-07-22 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure pharmacy recommendations were followed up on for 1 of 5 resident (Resident 25), reviewed for unnecessary medications. This failure placed the resident at risk of inaccurate dosing of medication, adverse side effects, and receiving a medication longer than medically necessary. Findings included . Review of the facility policy titled Medication Regimen Review (MRR) dated July 2021, showed the MRR involved reporting of findings with recommendations for improvement. Recommendations are acted upon and documented by the facility staff and/or the prescriber. Resident 25. Review of the resident's Electronic Health Record (EHR) showed, the resident admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses which included depression and psychotic disorder. Review of the comprehensive assessment, dated 06/23/2023, showed the resident's cognition was moderately impaired. Review of the pharmacy recommendation, dated 6/19/2023, showed the pharmacist…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2025-07-25 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the actual hours worked were documented on the daily nursing staff posting for 27 of 45 shifts reviewed for accuracy of posted nursing hours. This failure prevented residents, family members and visitors from knowing the actual hours worked by nursing staff. Findings included. Review of the facility's daily (days, evenings and nights) nurse staff posting forms from 07/01/2025 thorough 07/15/2025 showed on 27 of 45 shifts the posted nursing hours were not accurate and did not reflect the actual hours worked by nursing employees. During an interview on 07/24/2025, at 2:21 PM, Staff, I, Assistant Director of Nursing stated they were unaware that the daily nurse postings were not accurate, and their expectation was that the postings match the schedules of actual hours worked. Reference WAC 388-97-0020

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
HYATT FAMILY FACILITIES LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2006
HYATT, JEFFREYIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2006
HYATT, NORMANIndividual5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 02/01/2006
BERK, HEIDIIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 11/01/2012
REPP, REBECCAIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEEsince 10/13/2011
CLEVELAND, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2017

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.3M
Related-party expense15% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 64%Medicare 12%Other / private 23%

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$399per resident / day
operating cost
$12,141per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$399per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Washington Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Washington
$13,155/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$7,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 505367. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-07-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next