Golden Age Manor

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

49.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 36 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 40.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 85 beds and averages 58.7 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.82 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.95 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.58 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.03 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.66 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2024-03-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 2 of 4 residents (R) reviewed for pressure injuries (PI) (R27 and R6) received care consistent with professional standards of practice to prevent the development of a new pressure injury and promote healing of existing PIs. R27 developed a stage II PI on 10/28/23. On 12/27/23, the PI reoccurred as a stage 3.The care plan for PI interventions was not updated since 12/4/2023. R27 was not repositioned as instructed on the PI care plan, nor had a support surface for a stage 3 PI. The PI reoccurred on 2/14/24, healed on 2/26/24 and reoccurred on 3/6/24 causing actual harm. R6 has a PI; repositioning was not done as indicated on the PI care plan to promote healing of R6's PI. This is evidenced by: Guidelines from the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP) 2016, Pressure Injury Prevention Points, accessed 07, March 2024, Prevention Points | National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (npiap.com), states in part: Turn and reposition…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interview, the facility did not store, prepare, distribute, serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This has the potential to affect all 62 residents. -Surveyor observed clean water pitchers not inverted on open shelf in kitchen. -Surveyor observed in the walk-in cooler an open bag of whipped topping, an open container of butter, and prepared cinnamon rolls in a baking pan without dates indicating when they were opened, prepared, or when they should be used by. -Surveyor observed in the walk-in freezer opened bags of potato wedges, vegetables, and berries all without dates of when they were opened. -Surveyor observed in the dry storage area opened packages of cookies, dried noodles, split peas, powdered pudding and gelatin mixes, all without dates indicating when they were opened or when they should be used by. Findings include: On 6/22/26 at 8:50 AM, during initial tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manager (DM) I, Surveyor observed clean pitchers on bottom shelf that were not inverted or covered. On a shelf below the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 5 of 62 residents residing in the facility. Improper hand hygiene was observed during personal cares for R4, R6, R13, R40. Staff did not disinfect mechanical lifts after use for R4, R13, and R40 observed transferring with a mechanical lift. Staff did not wear proper personal protective equipment (PPE) when caring for R30 who is on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP).Example1 The facility policy, titled Handwashing/Hand Hygiene, dated 2000, states: This facility considers hand hygiene the primary means to prevent the spread of healthcare-associated infections.1. Hand Hygiene is indicated:a. immediately before touching a resident;b. before performing an aseptic ask (for example.);c. after contact with blood, body fluids, or contaminated surfaces;d. after touching the resident's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-06-24 · tag F0882 — widespread
  Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Infection Preventionist (IP) is trained in the required specialized education for infection prevention and control. This has the potential to affect all 62 residents.-The facility failed to ensure Registered Nurse (RN) G, who is acting in the role of the facility's Infection Preventionist (IP), had completed specialized training in infection prevention and control.Findings include: On [DATE], Surveyor reviewed the documentation the facility had provided for proof of the IP's training and certification. Surveyor found a portion of the modules had certificates of completion from the Center for Disease Control (CDC) infection control program. The CDC training log stated expired for the certificate of IP final test indicating the test was not taken in the time allowed after completing the modules. The required IP course does not show the IP certification test was taken and passed. Surveyor requested missing documentation and proof of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0887 — widespread
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility did not maintain documentation of screening, education, offering, and current Coronavirus 19 (COVID) vaccination status to staff. This has the potential to affect all 62 residents.Findings include: The facility policy titled, Employee Infection and Vaccination Status, with a revised date of January 2024 states: 2. Employees are offered or provided with vaccinations per state or local agency policies/regulations. 3. Employees are provided with educational materials to make informed decisions for non-mandated vaccinations. If declined, a declination form is completed and placed in the employee's health record. 5. Documentation of vaccinations includes the signature of the licensed healthcare provider and the employee when being administered. Vaccinations that are declined by the employee are documented on the applicable declination form and placed in the employee's health record.On 06/23/26 at 10:10 AM, Surveyor asked RN G if the facility maintains staff documentation on screening, education, offering, and current vaccination status.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-06-24 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that the Advanced Directives information related to resuscitation status was clearly identified on residents' medical records to ensure their life-sustaining wishes would be honored. This occurred for 9 of 18 sampled residents (R) reviewed for Advanced Directives. (R31, R5, R9, R7, R2, R59, R4, R30, and R32) R31's physician order noted code status of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)/Do Not Intubate (DNI). R31's advance directive did not include R31's wishes for resuscitation, no DNR/DNI form was signed by R31 or R31's representative, and no documentation in R31's medical record regarding conversation with R31 regarding code status. R5's physician order noted code status of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR)/Do Not Intubate (DNI). R5's advance directive did not include R5's wishes for resuscitation, no DNR/DNI form was signed by R5 or R5's representative, and R5's medical record did not document any conversation being held with R5 regarding code status. R9's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-24 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that ensure that accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident, for 1 of 1 resident (R32) reviewed. R32 did not receive prescribed eye drops per physician order. Findings include: The facility policies, titled Administering Medications and Instillation of Eye Drops, both dated 2001, do not address reordering of medication or what to do when medication is not available. Per CFR S483.70 (f) the facility must provide routine and emergency drugs and biologicals to its residents or obtain them under an agreement as described. Per CFR S483.45(a) Procedures. A facility must provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident. R32 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has no plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-03-30 · tag F0646 — isolated
  Notify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not complete a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for significant change in a timely manner.-R1 was admitted to hospice. The MDS assessment for significant change was not completed within 14 days.Findings include:Facility Policy titled, Comprehensive Assessments, last revised [DATE], states: Comprehensive assessments are conducted in accordance with criteria and timeframes established in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) User Manual.The RAI User Manual states the Significant Change in Status Assessment (SCSA) must be completed by the end of the 14th calendar day following determination that a significant change has occurred.Surveyor reviewed R1's electronic health record. Last completed MDS assessment was completed on [DATE].R1 was admitted to hospice on [DATE]. A SCSA was started on [DATE] but was incomplete and never submitted. R1 expired on [DATE].On [DATE] at 2:50 PM, Surveyor interviewed Director of Nursing (DON) B. DON B stated the MDS assessments…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident receives adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 3 residents reviewed (R4).R4 had a fall during a 1-staff transfer with mechanical lift. Per care plan, R4 required 2-assist. Findings include:Facility policy titled, Falls and Fall Risk, Managing, last revised March 2018, reads in part: Unintentionally coming to rest on the ground, floor or other lower level, but not as a result of an overwhelming external force.The staff, with the input of the attending physician will implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factors of falls for each resident at risk or with a history of falls.Facility policy titled, Care Plans, Comprehensive-Centered, last revised March 2022, reads in part: A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-10 · tag F0801 — widespread
  Employ sufficient staff with the appropriate competencies and skills sets to carry out the functions of the food and nutrition service, including a qualified dietician.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility did not designate a person to serve as the director of food and nutrition services who had completed the minimum qualification requirements for the position. This practice could potentially affect all 60 residents residing in the facility. This is evidenced by: On 4/7/25 at 9:10 AM, Surveyor conducted initial tour of the kitchen with Dietary Manager (DM) D. Surveyor interviewed DM D and requested verification of DM D's qualifications. DM D directed Surveyor to the two certifications on her office wall. On 4/8/25, Surveyor was provided copies of the certifications. In review of the DM certification, Surveyor noted it is for a Food Protection Manager which is accredited by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI)-Conference for Food Protection (CFP). Completed 2023-8-10 and valid through 2028-8-10 from the Always Food Safe Company. On 4/9/2025 at 8:50 AM, Surveyor interviewed Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) A, as DM D was unavailable. Surveyor asked if the facility has a full-time dietician in house. NHA A indicated they do…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the safety of food handling in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The facility practices had the potential to affect all 60 residents. Foods stored in the walk-in-cooler were not labeled and dated and the Head [NAME] did not allow the thermometer probe to air dry after cleaning with isopropyl alcohol prior to inserting into foods items intended to be served to residents for lunch. This is evidenced by: The facility policies titled, Food Receiving and Storage revised December 2008, states in part, 7. All foods stored in the refrigerator or freezer will be covered, labeled and dates (use by date). The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Food Code states in part, 4-901.11 Equipment and Utensils, Air-Drying Required. After cleaning and SANITIZING, EQUIPMENT and UTENSILS: (A) Shall be air-dried or used after adequate draining as specified in the first paragraph of 40 CFR 180.940 Tolerance exemptions for active and inert ingredients for use in antimicrobial formulations (food-contact…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 4 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI