Brewster Village

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 44 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 30.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 39 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.22 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 27% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 15% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 204 beds and averages 122.3 residents a day — about 60% occupied, or roughly 82 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 5.10 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 3.21 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.65 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 5.28 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.74 to 1.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 37% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents was provided for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 3 sampled residents.On 2/11/26 at approximately 6:00 AM, R1 had an unwitnessed fall in R1's room and was sent to the emergency room (ER) at approximately 7:00 AM. X-ray results revealed a worsened left humerus fracture, an L1 spinal compression fracture, and a scalp hematoma. On 2/27/26, R1 had surgery to repair the left humerus fracture. The facility's investigation indicated the fall occurred because R1's call light was not in reach and R1 self-transferred to the bathroom. (This example is being cited at past non-compliance.) Findings include:The facility's Fall policy, revised 3/2026, indicates: The focus of care as it relates to falls is to maximize the resident's autonomy, dignity, and self-esteem while trying to reduce falls and injury related to them .fall interventions should be implemented and monitored.On 3/19/26, Surveyor reviewed R1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection. This practice had the potential to affect all 122 residents residing in the facility. The facility's Legionella water management program did not include a building assessment to identify potential areas of concern where Legionella could develop. R4 was on enhanced barrier precautions (EBP). Staff did not wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) during cares for R4.Findings include: The facility's Water Management Program to Reduce Legionella Growth policy and procedure indicates: Facility risk assessment has identified that potential risk areas would include building water supply system, hot water loop system, fire, and building humidification system . Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance for Developing a Water Management Program to Reduce Legionella Growth and Spread in Buildings, dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not report an allegation of neglect to the State Agency (SA) for 1 resident (R) (R24) of 1 sampled resident.R24 reported an allegation of neglect by Van Driver (VD)-E on 3/13/26. R24 stated VD-E did not use a seatbelt or tie-downs during transport to secure R24's wheelchair in the van. VD-E made an abrupt stop which caused R24 to slide in the wheelchair and suffer rib, back, and lower extremity pain and bruising. The facility did not report the allegation of neglect to the SA.Findings include:The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Prohibition policy, revised 7/2025, indicates: At [NAME] Village, each villager has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property. Villagers must not be subjected to abuse by anyone or mistreatment by anyone, including but not limited to, facility team members, other villagers, consultants, volunteers, team members of other agencies serving the villager, family members or legal guardians,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-15 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of neglect was investigated for 1 resident (R) (R24) of 1 sampled resident.R24 reported an allegation of neglect by Van Driver (VD)-E on 3/13/26. R24 stated VD-E did not use a seatbelt or tie-downs during transport to secure R24's wheelchair in the van. VD-E made an abrupt stop which caused R24 to slide in the wheelchair and suffer rib, back, and lower extremity pain and bruising. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the allegation of neglect.Findings include:The facility's Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation Prohibition policy, revised 7/2025, indicates: At [NAME] Village, each villager has the right to be free from abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of property. Villagers must not be subjected to abuse by anyone or mistreatment by anyone, including but not limited to, facility team members, other villagers, consultants, volunteers, team members of other agencies serving the villager, family members or legal guardians,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the resident environment remained as free of accident hazards as possible for 1 resident (R) (R24) of 7 sampled residents.R24 reported that Van Driver (VD)-E did not use tie-downs or a seatbelt to secure R24's wheelchair in the van during transport on 3/13/26. VD-E made an abrupt stop which caused R24 to slide in the wheelchair and resulted in rib, back, and lower extremity pain and bruising to R24's knee. Findings include:The facility's [NAME] Village Van Use (Non-Emergent Transportation) policy, revised 3/2026, indicates: To assign responsibility and coordinate use of the van .Department Leaders, Health Information Associates, and Van Drivers .2. For safety reasons .Non-certified staff are not to boost, hoist, lift, or transfer villagers. In the event there is a questionable issue during transportation, the driver is to call the Building Supervisor. Staff and villagers are required to always use seat belts. If for any reason a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-15 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of 2 residents (R) (R138 and R143) of 24 sampled residents.R138 had melatonin at the bedside. R138 did not have a self-administration of medication assessment or a physician order that indicated R138 could safely and accurately self-administer medication or keep medication at the bedside. R143 had four 21 milligram (mg) nicotine patches, an Incruse Ellipta 62.5 microgram (mcg) dry powder inhaler, and a Breo Ellipta 100 mcg/25 mcg dry powder inhaler at the bedside. R143 did not have a self-administration of medication assessment or a physician order that indicated R143 could safely and accurately self-administer medication or keep medication at the bedside.Findings Include:The facility's undated Self-Administration of Medications by Residents policy indicates: Residents who desire to self-administer medications are permitted to do so if the facility's Interdisciplinary Team…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-15 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff and resident interview and record review, the facility did not ensure grievances were documented, thoroughly investigated, and resolved for 2 residents (R) (R4 and R5) of 6 sampled residents.On 7/24/25, R4 and R5 reported rough care by staff during an investigation for a facility-reported incident that occurred on 7/23/25. The facility did not document the concerns a grievances, thoroughly investigate the concerns, or provide resolution for R4 and R5.Findings include:The facility's Grievance Policy and Procedure, revised 1/2024, indicates: The purpose of the grievance policy is to ensure the facility makes prompt efforts to resolve grievances .The intent of the grievance process is to support each villager's right to voice grievances ( .those about treatment, care .or violation of rights) and to assure that after receiving a complaint/grievance, the facility actively seeks a resolution .The facility will promote the grievance process throughout the organization. This includes .Educating all those…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0552 — isolated
  Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident and staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R99) of 1 sampled resident was able to be informed of and participate in medical treatment/medical decisions in a language R99 could understand. R99's primary language was Spanish. R99 indicated a preference for staff to use interpreter services to ensure R99 could communicate medical treatment needs. Interpreter services were not consistently provided. In addition, R99's care plan did not address R99's language barrier. Findings include: The facility's undated Communication with Sensory Impaired Villagers policy indicates: .Interpreters and auxiliary aids will be provided at no cost to the villager. Villagers requiring an interpreter or an auxiliary aid should indicate to our staff that these services are required .Upon admission or as the need arises, the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator or the Social Worker shall assess the need for special communication provisions to sensory-impaired…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility did not ensure call lights were within reach for 3 residents (R) (R80, R83, and R93) of 4 sampled residents. During multiple observations between 1/6/25 and 1/8/25, R80 did not have a call light within reach. On 1/8/25, R83 was observed without a call light within reach. On 1/6/25, R93 was observed without a call light within reach. Findings include: The facility did not have a policy on ensuring call lights were within reach of residents. 1. From 1/6/25 to 1/8/25, Surveyor reviewed R83's medical record. R83 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including vascular dementia, generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, and encounter for palliative care. R83's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 10/29/24, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 8 out of 15 which indicated R83 had moderately impaired cognition. R83's activities of daily living (ADL) care plan contained an intervention (dated 3/8/23) that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure a physician was notified of a change in condition for 1 resident (R) (R56) of 7 sampled residents. R56's physician was not notified of skin wounds until 7 days after the wounds were discovered. Findings include: The facility's Notification of Change in Condition/Treatment policy, dated 2/2024, indicates: .Significant changes in the villager's physical, mental, or psychosocial status, or accidents/other incidents shall be reported to the Physician/Nurse Practitioner by the Licensed Nurse .the date, time, and who was notified shall be documented in the villager's medical record . On 1/6/25, Surveyor reviewed R56's medical record. R56 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including urinary tract infection (UTI), neurocognitive disorder with Lewy bodies (a form of progressive dementia that affects a person's ability to think, reason, and process information), dementia, type 2 diabetes, and erythema intertrigo (a type of skin…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 resident (R) (R10) of 3 sampled residents received the necessary care and treatment for oxygen therapy. R10 had a physician order for 2-6 liters per minute (LPM) of oxygen and used oxygen continuously. R10 did not have a care plan for oxygen use. In addition, R10's oxygen tubing was not changed after R10 was diagnosed with pneumonia. Findings include: The facility's undated Changing of Disposable Respiratory Supplies policy indicates: Nasal cannula and oxygen tubing: Change when device becomes soiled, discolored, stiff or every 3 months. Discard if resident recently had a respiratory infection. From 1/6/25 to 1/8/25, Surveyor reviewed R10's medical record. R10 had diagnoses including congestive heart failure (CHF), dementia, and pneumonia. R10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 2/2/24, had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 2 out of 15 which indicated R10 had severe cognitive impairment. R10 had a physician order, dated 10/23/24, for 2-6 LPM of oxygen via nasal cannula.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI