Congregational Home, Inc.

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 263 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 121 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.72 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 35% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 59.6 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 6.36 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.18 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 4.30 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 5.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 6.55 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.37 to 0.73 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure residents at risk for pressure injuries, and with pressure injuries, were comprehensively assessed for the development of an individualized plan of care with interventions to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new pressure injuries from forming. This was observed with 1 (R34) of 3 residents reviewed with pressure injuries and at risk for the development of pressure injuries. *R34 was assessed at high risk for the development of pressure injuries. Despite this, the facility did not initiate a turning or repositioning schedule for R34. On 11/7/23, R34 was noted to have developed a suspected deep tissue injury to the right heel. The facility did not individualize R34's care plan related to their pressure injury, conduct weekly wound assessments consistently or discuss risks versus benefits related to repositioning with R34 or R34's representative. Findings include: R34 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled: 61Number of residents cited:Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility did not ensure food was prepared, and served, in a sanitary manner. This was observed with the dish machine and the facility's 3 compartment sink which has the potential to affect all 61 Residents that reside at the facility.* The facility did not ensure the facility kitchen dish machine was functioning to sanitize dishware.*The facility did not ensure proper procedure for sanitization of dishes involving the 3-compartment sink.Findings include:The facility's Dish Machine policy and procedure dated 1/24/25 documents: . Dietary Supervisor will routinely log Dish Machine Temperatures to assure proper sanitizing of dishes in the Dish Machine Temp Log.1.Staff will monitor dish machine temperatures throughout the dishwashing process.2.Staff will record dish machine temperatures for the wash and rinse cycles at each meal.3.Staff will be trained to report any problem with the dish machine or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0636 — pattern
  Assess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled:8 of 12Number of residents cited:Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure admission and annual comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed in the timeframe prescribed in the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual for 8 (R38, R47, R48, R49, R53, R66, R79, and R91) of 12 residents reviewed for late MDS assessments.*R38's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] was in progress and had not been completed at the time of survey, 7/30/2025.*R47's Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] was in progress and had not been completed at the time of survey, 7/30/2025.*R48's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] was in progress and had not been completed at the time of survey, 7/30/2025.*R49's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] was in progress and had not been completed at the time of survey, 7/30/2025.*R53's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] was in progress and had not been completed at the time of survey,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-31 · tag F0640 — pattern
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled:6 of 12Number of residents cited:Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure admission, quarterly, and discharge Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed and transmitted in the timeframe prescribed in the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual for 6 (R24, R47, R61, R79, R81, and R88) of 12 residents reviewed for late MDS assessments.*R24's Discharge Return Not Anticipated MDS assessment dated [DATE] was not completed or transmitted by the specified timeframe.*R47's Annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] was not transmitted by the specified timeframe.*R61's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] was not transmitted by the specified timeframe.*R79's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] was not transmitted by the specified timeframe.*R81's Discharge Return Anticipated MDS assessment dated [DATE] was not completed or transmitted by the specified timeframe.*R88's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] was not transmitted by…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-31 · tag F0638 — isolated
  Assure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled:2 of 12Number of residents cited:Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were completed in the timeframe prescribed in the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual for 2 (R61 and R88) of 12 residents reviewed for late MDS assessments.*R61's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] was completed after the specified timeframe.*R88's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] was in progress and not completed by 7/4/2025 as specified in the RAI 3.0 User's Manual.Findings include:The Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) 3.0 User's Manual dated 10/2024 documents: The Quarterly assessment is an OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) non-comprehensive assessment for a resident that must be completed at least every 92 days following the previous OBRA assessment of any type. The MDS completion date (item Z0500B) must be no later than 14 days after the ARD (Assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Number of residents sampled:4Number of residents cited:1Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure each resident received adequate supervision and assistance to prevent accidents for 1 (R35) of 4 Residents reviewed for falls.*On 5/28/25, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-N rolled R35 away from CNA-N during incontinence cares and R35 rolled off the bed and onto the floor. Findings Include:The facility's Safe Resident Handling, policy and procedure modified 8/21/19 documents: .F. If only one person assisting Resident should be rolled towards caregiver vs away from them. Call for extra assist as needed.R35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (Irregular, rapid heart rate that causes poor blood flow), Hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid), Essential Hypertension (chronic condition of persistently high blood pressure), Chronic Kidney Disease (progressive damage and loss of function in the kidneys), Chronic Respiratory Failure (long-term…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 (R1) of 1 allegations of neglect were reported to the State Survey Agency within the required reporting timeframe. On 11/25/24, R1 and R1's spouse (Spouse-N) filed a grievance with Social Worker (SW)-D regarding a care concern that occurred on 11/22/25. The grievance was investigated, and the written results and plan were given to R1, and Spouse-N. On 11/28/24, Spouse-N sent an email to SW-D, during the Thanksgiving holiday weekend, stating that R1 and Spouse-N believes that the incident that occurred on 11/22/24 was neglectful and abusive. Facility staff did not report the allegation of neglect to the State Agency until 12/2/24, when SW-D returned from the holiday weekend. Findings include: The facility's policy dated 11/26/24, titled, Abuse, documents, in part: [Name of facility] prohibits mistreatment of residents including: . Neglect . Residents (and resident representatives) will be educated regarding their rights specific to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that 1 (R1) of 1 residents reviewed with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion. R1 informed surveyor that R1 does not always receive help from facility staff to complete stretches/range of motion (ROM) exercises 2 times a day as indicated in R1's Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) [NAME]. Facility staff do not document when stretches/ROM exercises are completed. R1 has a diagnosis of Multiple sclerosis with spasticity. R1 does not have a care plan with measurable goals and interventions related to spasticity and ROM. Findings include: The facility policy dated 2/22/24, entitled, ROM and/or Mobility, documents: Purpose/policy statement: Policy explanation and compliance guidelines: it is the policy of the [name of facility] to promote independence and quality of life by maintaining or improving a resident's quality of life. Policy: 1.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure that 1 (R2) of 2 residents reviewed received adequate supervision and asssitive devices to prevent accidents. * R2 suffered falls that were not thoroughly investigated, with fall interventions and revisions to the fall care plan post fall review & IDT (interdisciplinary team) not implemented. Findings include: The facility's policy titled, Falls and modified 4/3/23 under Policy documents To follow the intent of HFS 132 and Federal regulations F323 sic (F689) Congregational Home will provide an environment that is free from hazards over which the facility has control and will provide appropriate supervision to each resident to prevent avoidable falls. Under Procedure documents 10. The Charge Nurse caring for the resident that has fallen will complete the following forms: * Skilled Nursing Fall Incident Form A note from appropriate licensed and direct care staff providing care to the resident prior to fall and any witnesses if…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility did not ensure that food was prepared, distributed, and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 serving kitchens. *Cook-J was observed preparing food for residents while not wearing a beard hair restraint. *Server- L was observed walking around the kitchen in areas where food is prepared for residents while not wearing a beard hair restraint. *Server-K was observed grabbing ready to eat food with gloved hands, after touching non-sanitized food surfaces, and placing the ready to eat food on plates for residents to eat. This deficient practice has the potential to affect 61 of 61 residents who eat and receive their meals from the main serving kitchen. Findings include: 1. Hair Restraints The facility's policy did not have a last revision date, and titled: Employee Sanitary Practices documents, Policy: All employees will: 1. Wear hair restraints (hairnet, hat, and/or beard restraint) to prevent hair from contacting exposed food. On 04/29/2024 at 09:06 AM, during the initial…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review and interviews, the facility did not ensure that 1 (R59) of 15 residents reviewed had an individualized comprehensive plan of care. *R59 has bed canes on his bed and has a foley catheter. R59 did not have a comprehensive plan of care with individualized interventions to address the use of bed canes or a foley catheter. Findings Include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's Comprehensive Care Plan policy and procedure dated effective 3/15/18 and noted the following applicable documentation to R59 not having care plans in place for R59's foley catheter and the use of bed canes: .Policy: To develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each Resident, consistent with Resident rights that include measurable outcomes and timeframes to meet a Resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. Goal: Promote care for a Resident that will attain or maintain the Resident's highest practicable physical, mental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 60 rows in the source record cover these 30 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI