Newcare

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 73.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 49 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 43 beds and averages 36.0 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.80 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.22 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.70 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.85 to 0.68 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 28% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

17 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 6 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-05-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure 1 Resident (R) (R28) of 1 resident received adequate supervision to prevent elopement. R28 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and assessed to be at risk for elopement. R28 had diagnoses of schizophrenia and mild cognitive impairment. R28 wore a wanderguard, but was allowed to sit outside the front of the building while supervised by staff inside the building. On 10/10/22, R28 was observed by a Dietary Manager still on facility grounds, but beyond the adjacent Assisted Living facility. On 11/2/22, R28 was observed walking down the driveway toward the road. On 11/7/22, R28 was found at an apartment complex three blocks from the facility. The facility was unaware R28 eloped until contacted by the police. The facility's failure to supervise a resident who was assessed as an elopement risk and eloped without the facility's knowledge created a finding of Immediate Jeopardy that began on 11/7/22. Surveyor notified Nursing Home Administrator…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-20 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, and record review, the facility did not develop and/or implement an individualized, comprehensive care plan for 4 residents (R) (R11, R16, R6, and R13) of 14 sampled residents. R11 smoked and received oxygen therapy. R11 also received diuretic medication and was on contact and droplet precautions. The facility did not develop a comprehensive care plan that included interventions related to smoking, the use of diuretic medication, or infection prevention precautions. R16 smoked and received oxygen therapy. The facility did not develop a comprehensive care plan that included interventions related to smoking. R6's activities of daily living (ADL) and nutritional care plans did not include recommended approaches for staff to use when R6 refused to eat meals in a Broda chair or the dining room.R13 had an order for a WanderGuard for safety. R13's plan of care did not indicate R13 had a WanderGuard or contain intervetions for safety.Findings include: The facility's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection. This practice had the potential to affect more than 4 of the 17 residents (R) residing in the facility. R11 was not initially placed on precautions when R11 developed signs and symptoms of a respiratory infection, including a fever, increased cough, and increased wheezing, and was not included on the facility's respiratory surveillance line list. In addition, staff did not follow transmission-based precautions while caring for R11.R13 tested positive for influenza A on 8/6/25. R13's symptoms resolved date was not included on the facility's respiratory surveillance line list.R29 tested positive for influenza A on 8/4/25. R29's symptoms resolved date was not included on the facility's respiratory surveillance line list.Staff did not follow influenza outbreak precautions by wearing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 4 sampled residents. On 5/23/25, staff witnessed R2 strike R1 in the chest with an open hand multiple times. The facility did not report the incidence of abuse to local law enforcement. Findings include: The facility's Resident Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation/Exploitation policy, dated 8/2024, indicates: .3. In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, the facility must: a. Ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation, or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation/exploitation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegations is made, if the event that causes the allegation involves abuse or results in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of abuse was thoroughly investigated for 1 resident (R) (R1) of 4 sampled residents. On 5/23/25, staff witnessed R2 strike R1 in the chest multiple times. Following the altercation, staff were not provided education to prevent further abuse among residents. Findings include: On 6/18/25, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including congestive heart failure, disorder of psychological development, diabetes, and anxiety. R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/3/25, included a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15 which indicated R1 had severe cognitive impairment. R1 had a legal Guardian for healthcare decisions. On 6/18/25, Surveyor reviewed R2's medical record. R2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, dementia with agitation, unspecified mood disorder, anxiety, and major depression.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-06-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — pattern
  Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure vaccinations were reviewed, offered, or administered for 4 residents (R) (R11, R16, R21, and R22) of 5 sampled residents. The facility did not offer R11, R16, R21, and R22 the Prevanr20® (PCV20) vaccine. Findings include: Abbreviations (www.cdc.gov): PCV13: 13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Prevnar13®) PCV15: 15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Vaxneuvance®) PCV20: 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (Prevnar 20®) PPSV23: 23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine (Pneumovax23®) The most recent Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations for pneumococcal vaccinations indicate: For adults 65 years or older who have only received PPSV23, the CDC recommends: Give 1 dose of PCV15 or PCV20. The PCV15 or PCV20 dose should be administered at least 1 year after the most recent PPSV23 vaccination. Regardless of if PCV15 or PCV20 is given, an additional dose of PPSV23 is not recommended since they already…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not report an allegation of sexual abuse to the State Agency (SA) for 2 residents (R) (R29 and R94) of 2 sampled residents. On 3/21/24, staff observed R29 seek out R94 after redirection and kiss R94 on the lips. The facility did not report the allegation of sexual abuse to the SA. Findings include: The facility's Resident Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation/Exploitation of Property Policy and Procedure, with a revision date 5/1/24, indicates: It is the policy of NEWCare, Inc. that residents be maintained in a safe, protective, and humane environment free from mistreatment, neglect, verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse .All possible attempts will be made to identify residents whose personal histories render them at risk of abusing other residents and when identified, care plans will include intervention strategies to prevent occurrences of abusive behavior. Allegations that abuse of any type has occurred will be handled as identified in the following procedure .Reporting: 1. The Nursing Home Administrator, Director…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure an allegation of sexual abuse was investigated for 2 residents (R) (R29 and R94) of 2 sampled residents. The facility did not investigate an allegation of sexual abuse involving R29 and R94. Findings include: The facility's Resident Abuse, Neglect, and Misappropriation/Exploitation of Property Policy and Procedure, with a revision date of 5/1/24, indicates: It is the policy of NEWCare, Inc. that residents be maintained in a safe, protective, and humane environment free from mistreatment, neglect, verbal, sexual, physical, and mental abuse .by staff as well as other residents throughout their stay in the facility .All possible attempts will be made to identify residents whose personal histories render them at risk of abusing other residents and when identified, care plans will include intervention strategies to prevent occurrences of abusive behavior. Allegations that abuse of any type has occurred will be handled as identified in the following procedure .Investigation of abuse allegation: An investigation by the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. On 6/18/24, Surveyor reviewed R29's medical record. R29 had diagnoses including unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, cognitive communication deficit, and adjustment disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct. R29's most recent MDS assessment, dated 4/10/24, documented a BIMS score of 1 out of 15 which indicated R29 had severe cognitive impairment. R29 had an activated Power of Attorney (POA) for medical decisions. A behavior care plan, initiated on 7/21/22 and updated on 3/19/24, stated R29 will not exhibit socially inappropriate/disruptive behavior through the next review period and indicated: R29 will often greet other residents by touching or rubbing their arm or leg in a friendly manner. R29 has become more affectionate toward male residents with no regard for personal privacy. Please redirect R29 when this is happening. R29 has also been lifting R29's top and exposing R29's self to male residents and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe and sanitary environment to prevent the transmission of communicable disease and infection for 2 residents (R) (R1 and R21) of 2 sampled residents. R1 and R21 resided in the same room. Signs posted outside R1 and R21's room indicated droplet precautions, airborne precautions, and contact precautions were in place. On 6/19/24, staff did not don the appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) prior to entering R1 and R21's room to complete cares. Findings include: The facility's Infection Prevention and Control Manual Transmission-Based Precautions indicates: - Contact Precautions: The purpose of contact precautions is to prevent transmission of infections that are spread by direct (e.g., person-to-person) or indirect contact with the resident or environment. Contact precautions require the use of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), including a gown and gloves upon entering the room or contacting the resident or…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and record review, the facility did not ensure the accurate administration of medication for 1 Resident (R) (R1) of 8 sampled residents. R1's medical record contained a physician's order to administer furosemide (used to remove excess fluid from the body) as needed based on R1's weight changes. The facility did not administer the medication as ordered by R1's physician. Findings include: On 2/7/24, Surveyor reviewed R1's medical record. R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction (also known as stroke), atrial fibrillation (an irregular and often rapid heart rate), hypertension (high blood pressure) and edema (swelling due to excess fluid accumulation in body tissues). R1's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/2/23, contained a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15 which indicated R1 had severe cognitive impairment. R1's medical record indicated R1's Power of Attorney for Healthcare (POAHC) was responsible for R1's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 7 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $78K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI