No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Lakeland Health Care Ctr

1922 Cty Rd Nn, Elkhorn, WI 53121 · Government - County · 90 certified beds · (262) 741-3600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuseBehavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0744)2 immediate-jeopardy citations1 immediate-jeopardy citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)$84,168 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (5/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (31% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Sep 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (21) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $84,168 in federal fines (most recent 2023-11-21)
  • its payroll-based staffing score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 5 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the staffing score rests on the facility's own payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★★ 5/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
201 E Morrissey Dr · (262) 723-3100 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
939 N Wisconsin St · (262) 723-5055 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
58 W Market St · (262) 723-2996 · Call to confirm hours
Park
417 N Broad St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
319 N Broad St · (262) 723-7440

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 3 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased18.4%16.1%15.4%worse
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.1%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%2.1%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection4.5%2.7%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.0%5.7%6.5%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.1%3.3%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened22.1%18.4%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.5%16.9%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.8%5.0%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control25.5%24.6%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.7%15.8%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%82.2%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission30.9%23.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.2%15.5%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.051.661.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.732.291.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

43.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 122 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

43.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
46.3%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.17U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.09hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
<0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 46.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 67 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 15% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 10% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF43.7%CMS range 37.0–52.651.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.9%CMS range 8.6–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge46.3%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge32.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.6%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.6%CMS range 3.2–10.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.651.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.75
RN hours/ resident / day
0.66
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.55
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.96
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.36
RN hoursweekends
31.1%
Total nursing turnover
16.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 90 beds and averages 80.9 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.96 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.55 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.32 on weekdays — 29% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.91 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 31% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

1
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-01-26)
6
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents were free from physical and verbal abuse for 1 (R1) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse.R1, who is diagnosed with dementia, started displaying aggressive behaviors and being resistive to cares within the first 2 weeks of being admitted to the facility. The facility did not develop or implement a behavior care plan with resident specific interventions to help guide staff in how to care for R1. On 8/11/25, R1 was being cared for by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA)-C and Registered Nurse (RN)-D. R1 was agitated, aggressive and resistive to cares. CNA-C was working to calm R1. RN-D entered R1's room and was yelling at R1 to let them take care of R1. While R1 was sitting at the edge of R1's bed, RN-D grabbed R1's legs and threw them in R1's bed, making R1 lay down in bed. RN-D then grabbed R1's blanket and used the blanket to hold R1's shoulders down. While holding R1's shoulders down on the bed, RN-D was shaking R1's shoulders and was yelling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent 5 (R3, R4, R6, R1, and R5) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse to be free from sexual abuse from R2. The facility failed to prevent 3 (R4, R1, and R8) of 6 residents reviewed to be free from sexual or physical abuse from R7. R2 had an identified history of inappropriate sexual behaviors with peers and staff. The facility did not have effective interventions in place to prevent sexual abuse of peers. When sexual abuse of peers did occur, the interventions were not revised, new interventions were not put in place, and monitoring was not increased; R2 continued to sexually abuse his peers. R2 attempted to enter R3's room multiple times uninvited (6/27/23, 8/8/23.) On 8/8/23, R2 entered R3's room while she was undressed. The facility did not assess R3 for any psychosocial harm or mental anguish after the sexual abuse. R4 was approached by R2 on 9/26/23, 10/19/23, 10/20/23 or 10/21/23, and was told sexual comments or propositions and was touched…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2023-11-21 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not provide appropriate treatment and services for 2 (R2 and R7) of 2 resident reviewed with a diagnosis of dementia with behavioral symptoms to allow them to attain or maintain his or her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. R2 was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of dementia with behaviors. Shortly after admission, R2 started exhibiting behavior symptoms included wandering into female peers' rooms and making sexual comments, propositioning and gesturing to staff and peers. The R2 was seen by psych services to assist with behavior concerns and pharmacological interventions which were not effective. R2's care plan was not person centered and did not address R2's sexual and wandering behaviors exhibited towards others resulting in sexual abuse of 5 female peers. After the abuse, R2's care plan interventions were not reviewed and/or revised when documented interventions were not effective. R7 was admitted to the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-09-02 · tag F0744 — failed to care for residents with dementia — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with dementia.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure residents with dementia received the appropriate treatment and services to attain their highest practical physical, mental and psychological well-being for 1 (R1) of 1 resident reviewed with dementia.*R1 has a diagnosis of dementia. R1 started displaying aggressive behaviors and being resistive to cares within the first 2 weeks of being admitted to the facility. The facility did not develop or implement a behavior care plan with resident specific interventions to help guide staff in how to care for R1. The facility did not document that R1's Medical Doctor (MD) was made aware of R1's increase in aggressive and resistive care behaviors. On 8/9/25 at 4:18 AM, an early Saturday morning, R1 continued with behaviors and Registered Nurse (RN)-D documented that R1's MD was contacted by fax to inform R1's MD of R1's behavior and to receive further orders. R1's MD did not acknowledge the fax communication on 8/9 or 8/10/25 and facility staff did not follow…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility did not maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to reduce the transmission of disease and infection for 1 of 1 (R1) resident reviewed for catheter care.R1's catheter collection bag was observed during to be attached to a garbage receptacle and the bottom of the collection bag was observed resting directly on the floor.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Infection Prevention and Control Program, dated last reviewed, 8/25, documents: BACKGROUND: The intent of this program is to ensure that the Infection Prevention and Control Program prevents, recognizes, and controls, to the extent possible, the onset and spread of infection within the skilled nursing facility. This program serves to: Provide a system for preventing, identifying, reporting and controlling infections for all residents, staff, visitors and contract staff. Provide surveillance and investigation to prevent, to the extent possible, the onset and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure that 1 (R1) of 1 allegations of potential abuse/neglect were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made.*On 6/23/2025, R1 received medication that was not prescribed to R1, which resulted in R1 going to the emergency room. Facility staff did not report the incident in a timely manner and did not report the potential neglect/abuse to the administrator and/or law enforcement. Findings include:The facility's policy dated 9/2024 and titled Freedom from Abuse, Neglect & Exploitation documents: Procedure: Internal Reporting: a. Employees, and contracted employees will receive orientation and education on the facility abuse policy and reporting requirements. Staff must always report any abuse or suspicion of abuse immediately to the Administrator and Director of Nursing.R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that include Heart Failure, Renal Insufficiency, Dementia and Paroxysmal Atrial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility did not ensure 2 (R3 & R1) of 3 residents were free of significant medication errors.* On 6/30/25, R3 received R2's medication which consisted of Hydralazine 50 mg (milligrams) and Ropinirole 0.5 mg.* On 6/23/25, R1 received another resident's medication.Findings include:The facility's policy titled, Medication Administration Guidelines and last revised 7/2025 under Purpose documents Compliance with current professional standards of practice, Lakeland Health Care Center maintains a medication administration process to safely prepare, administer and store resident medication. Under Procedure for Safety documents 1. Resident will be identified prior to medication administration by asking the resident their name. Whether the resident can state their name or not, the residents' phone in PCC (pointclickcare) will be used to verify the correct resident. Under Medication Pass guidelines documents .5. Follow the 6 rights of medication administration: Right Resident,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility did not ensure each resident is treated with dignity and respect that promoted maintenance or enhancement of quality of life. This occurred for 2 (R30 and R55) of 10 Residents reviewed for dignity. *On 8/29/24, Surveyor observed R30 and R55 being fed breakfast at the same time by Recreation Therapy Leader (RTL)-E who was standing during the entire meal. Further, RTL-E was referring to R30 by a nickname Bob-O that is not documented in the care plan as an approved nickname. Findings Include: The facility's policy and procedure Assisting Residents With Meals last revised 3/2024 documents: Purpose .The facility will ensure that Residents that need assistance with meals will receive assistance for the consumption of a meal. Meals are to be an enjoyable experience for Residents. A Resident's dignity and preference should be incorporated into each meal. Procedure Assisting Residents in the dining room will be done by staff who are trained in feeding Residents. 4. Feed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did ensure 1( R61) out of 18 residents were free from neglect. R61 needed extensive assistance from staff to use the toilet and to transfer on and off the toilet. When R61 would become fatigued, often in the evening, staff would use an EZ stand to transfer R61 on and off the toilet. On 12/24/24, 2nd shift staff member left R61 attached to the sling for the EZ stand, seated on the toilet at approximately 9:30 p.m The 2nd shift CNA left the facility at the end of her shift without providing cares to R61 and transferring R61 back to bed. A night shift nurse found R61,at approximately 12:45 a.m., still seated on the toilet and was visibly upset. R61 is unable to make her needs known and has a diagnosis of dementia. This is evidenced by: Policy Review: Freedom from Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation origination date : 04/2013. Last revision: 02/2024 Definitions: Neglect is defined as the indifference or disregard for resident care, comfort, or safety, result in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and staff interviews, the facility did not ensure that 2 allegations of abuse involving 5 Residents (R32, R12, R62, R27, and R39) were reported immediately to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A and the State Survey Agency. *On 2/3/24, and 2/4/24, Registered Nurse (RN)-Q documented R32 was verbally abusing R12, R62, and R27 and did not report this to NHA-A. *On 6/10/24, R39 reported an allegation of mistreatment by a CNA on 6/9/24. The allegation was not reported to NHA-A until 6/17/24. The facility's policy entitled, Freedom From Abuse, Neglect and Exploitation, last revised 2/2024 documents: BACKGROUND . Residents will not be subjected to abuse by anyone, including but not limited to, facility staff, other Residents, consultants or volunteers, staff of other agencies serving the Resident, family members or legal guardians, friends or other individuals. G. Reporting and Response Components Abuse Policy Requirements: It is the policy of the facility that abuse allegations are reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility did not implement fall prevention interventions to prevent falls and did not consult with a physician post fall 2 (R72, R32) of 9 residents reviewed for accidents. *R72 sustained an injury of unknown origin to their scalp that was not properly assessed or reported to physician until 3 days later. * R32 sustained an unwitnessed fall from the toilet due to being unsupervised in the bathroom. R32's comprehensive care plan indicates that they are not to be left alone on the toilet. Findings include: Surveyor reviewed the facility's policy and procedure entitled, Fall Prevention Program, last revised 4/2024 which documents: . Background The facility must ensure that the Resident environment remains free of accident hazards as is possible and each Resident receives adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent falls and/or accidents. Goal The goal is to create a systems approach by which the facility identifies Residents at risk for falls, evaluates the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility did not provide adequate nutritional support to 1 (R72) of 4 residents reviewed for Nutrition. *R72 had physician's orders in place to monitor weights twice weekly. The facility did not consistently monitor R72's weight in accordance with physician orders. R72 sustained a 7.6 pound weight loss from 5/22/24-6/1/24 with no physician notification documented until 6/5/24. Findings include: 1.) R72 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of cognitive communication deficit, congestive heart failure and intracerebral hemorrhage. R72's Quarterly MDS (Minimum Data Set) date of 7/31/24 indicates a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Score of 05. This score indicates R72's mental capacity severely impacts their daily decision making and communication. On 8/27/24, Surveyor reviewed R72's medical record including physicians orders, weights from admission on [DATE] to 8/27/24 and comprehensive care plan. Surveyor noted R72's documented weight…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility did not ensure the cleaning and disinfecting of R30's glucometer after each use. Facility Glucometers are being disinfected with a 70% isopropyl alcohol wipe daily rather than with a disinfectant bleach wipe in order to kill bloo- bourne pathogens. *On 8/29/24 Surveyor observed LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse)-M administer blood glucose testing for R30. RN-G did not clean and disinfect R30's Glucometer with a disinfectant wipe which kills blood borne pathogens. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 1 of 1 residents reviewed for blood glucose monitoring. Findings include: On 8/29/24, at 8:50 AM, Surveyor observed the medication administration task on the facility's 200 unit. Surveyor observed R30 in their bedroom. R30 had completed approximately 50 % of their breakfast at this time. Surveyor observed LPN-M approach R30 and proceed to check R30's blood glucose level. Surveyor noted LPN-M donning gloves, taking glucometer from plastic bag then conducting blood sampling of R30's blood for glucose testing. LPN-M completed R30's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring all alleged violations involving resident-to-resident abuse, were reported immediately, (but not later than 2 hours if the allegation involves abuse or result in serious bodily injury or not later than 24 hours if the events do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury) to the Administrator and to the State Agency for 6 of 6 allegations of abuse involving 5 residents, R7, R8, R4, R2, and R1. In addition, the facility did not report the results of all investigations, within 5 working days of the incident to the state agency. * On 7/28/23, 8/21/23, 9/10/23, 9/21/23, R7 was documented to have been involved in a resident-to-resident physical altercation that was not reported to the state agency. On 9/23/23, R7 was documented to have been involved in a resident-to-resident sexual abuse allegation with R4 that was not reported to the State Agency. * On 10/20/23, R2 was documented to have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 7 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2023-11-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility did not ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, mistreatment, or resident to resident altercations were thoroughly investigated for 6 out of 6 reportable incidents reviewed involving 5 residents (R7, R4, R8, R1 and R2.) On 7/28/23 and 9/10/23, R7 and R4 were involved in resident-to-resident physical altercations. On 7/28/23, R7 was pushing R4's wheelchair. R4's feet were dragging, and she was yelling out in pain. On 9/10/23, R7 was squeezing R4's shoulders so hard that she was yelling out in pain. Per facility policy and federal regulation allegations of abuse are to be reported to the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA)-A. NHA-A and DON-B were not made aware of these allegations of abuse. There were no interviews completed and no investigation done into the abuse allegations. On 8/21/23, R7 and R8 were involved in a resident-to-resident physical altercation. R7 slapped a cup out of R8's hand. (NHA)-A was made aware of this incident. There were no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility did not ensure that residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for 1 of 3 (R1) residents reviewed. * On 7/18/23, R1 was observed to have maggots in his incontinence brief and on his person. The facility did not complete an investigation as to when he was last seen and received ADL's (Activity of Daily Living) or why he was found with maggots on his person. There was no evidence the facility assessed other resident's wounds for evidence of worms, maggots or parasites and no evidence the facility completed additional pest control. Findings include: R1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He was placed on Hospice care 6/28/23 and passed away 7/26/23. R1 was admitted with multiple pressure injuries, including a stage 4 on the sacrum. Wounds were followed by the facility wound care nurse and outside wound care. No concerns were identified with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview the Facility did not serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. The thermometer was not sanitized between food items during the breakfast meal on 6/6/23 observed in the two serving kitchens on Unit A. This has the potential to affect 30 Residents residing on the A unit. Findings include: The Food Safety Guidelines for Holding and Serving policy and procedure last revised 2/2016 under procedure includes Check internal food temperatures with food thermometer prior to service. Sanitize the food thermometer after each use. On 6/5/23 at 12:24 p.m. Surveyor observed a food truck arrive to the kitchen area located by the low numbers of the A unit. At 12:27 p.m. RC (Relief Cook)-D place food containers into the steamer from the food truck, wash his hands using a paper towel to shut off the water, placed gloves on, and started to plate up the Resident's lunch meal. Surveyor did not observe RC-D take food temperatures prior serving. On 6/5/23 at 12:41 p.m. Surveyor asked RC-D why he didn't take food temperatures prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the Facility did not ensure that Residents at risk for pressure injuries received necessary treatment and services to prevent the development of pressure injuries for 1 (R64) of 5 Residents reviewed for pressure injuries. * On 6/5 and 6/6/23, R64 was observed in bed without the heels being offloaded per plan of care initiated on 7/22/22 and revised on 3/22/23. Findings include: The Wound Prevention and Treatment Program last revised 2/2023 under 2. The Wound Prevention and Treatment Program shall include: documents F. Standard repositioning with cares and rounds for those residents unable to reposition themselves, which will include floating of heels, or other interventions as indicated by care plan. R64's diagnoses includes Parkinson's Disease, hypertension, anxiety disease, and vascular dementia. R64 has a history of pressure injuries. The potential for pressure ulcer care plan initiated 7/22/22 and revised 3/22/23 includes an intervention of Elevate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not provide supervision to prevent accidents for 1 (R8) of 7 residents reviewed for accidents. *R8's call light was not observed clipped to R8's clothing per R8's care plan. *R8 had a fall on 02/03/2023. The facility did not thoroughly investigate the fall in order to implement an appropriate intervention. Findings include: R8 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including non-traumatic brain dysfunction and Alzheimer's disease with late onset. R8's most recent quarterly Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS), dated [DATE], documented R8 had a BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) of 8, indicating R8 had cognitive impairment; R8 required one staff limited assist with activities of daily living; and R8 had one fall since admission or prior assessment. R8's admission MDS CAA (Care Area Assessment) worksheet, dated 11/14/22, documented [Resident Name] has a history of falls prior to admission. The last fall did result in a right hip…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-07 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility did not promptly refer a resident to the dentist for 1 (R65) of 1 Residents reviewed for dental services. On 3/23/23 R65's family member informed Facility staff R65 has a loose tooth and requested R65 be seen by a dentist. R65 is not scheduled to be seen by a dentist until 6/8/23. Findings include: The Dental Service policy & procedure last revised 9/2022 under Purpose documents, Every resident admitted to [Facility's name] is to have an oral examination completed within six months following admission, unless an oral examination has been performed within six months prior to admission. The dental examination form is kept in the resident's clinical record in the consult section. Subsequent oral health care is arranged for and provided to the resident as needed. All consenting residents will have dental exams performed annually by the consulting dentist. The exams will be done in the clinic. For urgent dental needs, clinic coordinator will arrange…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the Facility did not have an effective infection control program for 3 (R64, R38, & R33) of 4 Residents observed during personal cares. * R64, R38, & R33 were observed to not have appropriate hand hygiene during personal care observations. * The mechanical lift was not disinfected after being used for R38, who is on enhanced barrier precautions. Findings include: The Handwashing policy and procedure last revised 7/2022 under purpose documents Consistent and proper use of hand washing techniques will be practiced to protect both the residents and employees from the spread of infection. Under indications includes Decontaminate hands immediately after removing gloves and prior to putting on another glove(s) between each single task. 1. On 6/5/23 at 9:50 a.m. Surveyor observed R64 sitting on the toilet with a mechanical lift in front of R64 with CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant)-G. CNA-G removed her gloves and placed new gloves on. CNA-G did not wash or cleanse her hands prior to placing new gloves on. CNA-G informed Surveyor R64 lays…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$84,168 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $84,168 — penalty dated 2023-11-21

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
COUNTY OF WALWORTHOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF100%since 07/19/2006
JOHNSON, DENISEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 02/24/2020
MONROE, KENNETHIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 01/01/2017

CMS files one row per role, so the 6 rows in the source record cover these 3 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

1 organizational owner listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-21.2%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 61%Medicare 6%Other / private 33%

A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$435per resident / day
operating cost
$13,239per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$359per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in WI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Wisconsin Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Wisconsin
$10,646/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,319/mo
Nursing home (private)
$6,540/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 525625. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-26, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next